Thomas Jefferson: The Art of Power | Jon Meacham | Talks at Google

  Рет қаралды 85,163

Talks at Google

Talks at Google

11 жыл бұрын

Pulitzer Prize--winning author Jon Meacham returns to the Googleplex for a talk about "Thomas Jefferson: the Art of Power."
You can find Jon's books on Google Play: goo.gl/5lDWk
From the publisher: Thomas Jefferson hated confrontation, and yet his understanding of power and of human nature enabled him to move men and to marshal ideas, to learn from his mistakes, and to prevail. Passionate about many things-women, his family, books, science, architecture, gardens, friends, Monticello, and Paris-Jefferson loved America most, and he strove over and over again, despite fierce opposition, to realize his vision: the creation, survival, and success of popular government in America. Jon Meacham lets us see Jefferson's world as Jefferson himself saw it, and to appreciate how Jefferson found the means to endure and win in the face of rife partisan division, economic uncertainty, and external threat. Drawing on archives in the United States, England, and France, as well as unpublished Jefferson presidential papers, Meacham presents Jefferson as the most successful political leader of the early republic, and perhaps in all of American history.
The father of the ideal of individual liberty, of the Louisiana Purchase, of the Lewis and Clark expedition, and of the settling of the West, Jefferson recognized that the genius of humanity-and the genius of the new nation-lay in the possibility of progress, of discovering the undiscovered and seeking the unknown. From the writing of the Declaration of Independence to elegant dinners in Paris and in the President's House; from political maneuverings in the boardinghouses and legislative halls of Philadelphia and New York to the infant capital on the Potomac; from his complicated life at Monticello, his breathtaking house and plantation in Virginia, to the creation of the University of Virginia, Jefferson was central to the age. Here too is the personal Jefferson, a man of appetite, sensuality, and passion.
The Jefferson story resonates today not least because he led his nation through ferocious partisanship and cultural warfare amid economic change and external threats, and also because he embodies an eternal drama, the struggle of the leadership of a nation to achieve greatness in a difficult and confounding world.

Пікірлер: 80
@rockstarr9000
@rockstarr9000 11 жыл бұрын
I went to college with Jon. He is as brilliant now as he was then.
@CC-jl7jz
@CC-jl7jz Жыл бұрын
And a woke idiot.
@margotadair1007
@margotadair1007 Жыл бұрын
Someone with JM’s knowledge of the past (of past presidents’ lives) should be an adviser to any sitting president. His knowledge of how past presidents dealt with issues is so on point. I like his commentary on Jefferson’s belief that civic engagement in politics should be met with compromise is important for the continuation of our republic. Meacham’s mention of G Washington’s letter to both Hamilton and Jefferson about their cutthroat dealings with each other endangered the new republic’s survival and making the country vulnerable to foreign enemies is so applicable to todays’ politics. Of how some elected leaders now see enemies of decades ago as not an enemy (i.e. Russia, North Kore, Nazism) and how Congress is at an impasse regarding governance for the entire country and focusing on partisan politics and the politization of government agencies is so scary and discouraging.
@JustinUrban1
@JustinUrban1 5 жыл бұрын
What we are missing now is more intellectuals like Jon. Now people only listen to KZfaq Political and Conspiracy theorists.
@gls600
@gls600 7 жыл бұрын
What I love about Jefferson is the willingness he showed to set aside dogma in order to accomplish the purchase French Louisiana. Today it seems that politicians would rather see the country fall apart rather than compromise on positions that stem from their world view.
@montello33
@montello33 6 жыл бұрын
And the US got a hell of a deal and 10 cents an acre as they say.
@garywilliams1935
@garywilliams1935 3 жыл бұрын
We need a revolution, of the French variety.
@USCPSC-uz6yl
@USCPSC-uz6yl 8 жыл бұрын
I got the book yesterday and it's very informative and interesting. Jefferson is probably one of my favorite Presidents.
@karanpatel1452
@karanpatel1452 5 жыл бұрын
The dude who raped his slaves?
@ednakelley814
@ednakelley814 4 жыл бұрын
@@karanpatel1452 Because when you find fault and sin in someone that negates everything else they ever did right?
@nstix2009xitsn
@nstix2009xitsn 4 жыл бұрын
@@karanpatel1452 You're a racist liar. "Giving Thomas Jefferson the Business: The Sally Hemings Hoax." nicholasstixuncensored.blogspot.com/2019/07/giving-thomas-jefferson-business-sally.html
@Heraclitean
@Heraclitean 11 жыл бұрын
I envy people like Meacham, who can answer the question, "Does there need to be yet another book about Jefferson?" with an unproblematic, unhesitating "Yes, and I shall write it."
@dejure9178
@dejure9178 5 жыл бұрын
Here is a non-fringe commentary on this book. Well-written, insightful biography that belongs in the recent pantheon of excellent biographies written on a number of Founders: Adams and Hamilton come to mind.
@victorcross5949
@victorcross5949 3 жыл бұрын
I've just finished reading it; it is very good.
@wildbudda
@wildbudda 6 жыл бұрын
He's great. Wow, what a tough crowd though! No one is laughing at his jokes which are pretty funny!
@davysteak
@davysteak 8 ай бұрын
They didn't understand the references. STEM heads are lacking in the liberal arts.
@forrestpowell12
@forrestpowell12 11 жыл бұрын
I read the remainder of the book this week while having a cough/fever. Absolutely displayed accuratemy to the mind and long life. It researched heavily into numerous Jeffersonian images that I couldn't believe we're found, especially his fascination in balloons under his administration.
@Satyr_Art_Studio
@Satyr_Art_Studio 11 жыл бұрын
49:15 This is a valuable point made here, and it touches on an important aspect of Google's current attempts at tuning and revising it's services; Google is currently practicing customizing search results, both in Google Search as well as in KZfaq. Consequently individuals are being presented with self-reinforcing query results and denied alternate POV to evaluate. My wife & I already experience VASTLY different search results. We surprise each other with them daily. It's VERY disturbing.
@HEALInformatics
@HEALInformatics 4 жыл бұрын
Meacham is not some basement blogger: "A former Executive Editor and Executive Vice President at Random House, he is a contributing writer to The New York Times Book Review, a contributing editor to Time magazine, and a former Editor-in-Chief of Newsweek. He is the author of several books. He won the 2009 Pulitzer Prize for Biography or Autobiography for American Lion: Andrew Jackson in the White House. He holds the Carolyn T. and Robert M. Rogers Endowed Chair in American Presidency at Vanderbilt University." -WP
@nstix2009xitsn
@nstix2009xitsn 4 жыл бұрын
Jeffersonian American He's no "basement blogger," he's a high-class hoaxer, as attested to by his fraudulent Pulitzer. "Giving Thomas Jefferson the Business: The Sally Hemings Hoax." nicholasstixuncensored.blogspot.com/2019/07/giving-thomas-jefferson-business-sally.html
@writethisthat3613
@writethisthat3613 3 жыл бұрын
fantastic, I really enjoyed this
@wcgreennyc
@wcgreennyc 11 жыл бұрын
To say that "The War between Eng. & Am. was from 1764 to1812" is to say that Great Britain was at war with the world. King & Parliament treated the world with the same pomposity that it treated the United States. American reactions were no different than, say French, Prussian, Indian, Chinese, etc., etc., etc.
@blackstar101kesha
@blackstar101kesha 7 жыл бұрын
"We did it for SEO"
@HundreadD
@HundreadD 3 жыл бұрын
That comment about Twitter was more than prescient
@FCSchaefer
@FCSchaefer 10 жыл бұрын
Meacham's book is a great work on a great man, unfairly maligned in this too politically correct age.
@LaplacianFourier
@LaplacianFourier Ай бұрын
God damn right! We are all enjoying the fruits of his labor while smearing feces on his legacy. Jefferson was wrong about humans, we deserve kings and masters.
@firstlady...
@firstlady... 4 жыл бұрын
When Jon Meacham speaks, you need to get your dictionary out!
@shotgun111180
@shotgun111180 6 жыл бұрын
jefferson is the best!!
@shotgun111180
@shotgun111180 6 жыл бұрын
I know right... just ask Burr!
@ednakelley814
@ednakelley814 4 жыл бұрын
@Walter King You're evaluating 18th century policies through 20th century mindset. Context. Most of these men, Washington included were all white supremacist by it's literal definition. They truly felt that the black man was not their equal. Lincoln even felt this way and he was an abolitionist! I'm not saying that it right but that was the wide belief in their time period, not ours. Context is important in the study of history!! Although Hamilton may not have owned slaves, his hands aren't dirty. Even Alexander Hamilton's grandson said that his grandfather would buy and sell slaves for other people acting as their Representative. Point being is we can find dirt anyone. Are we now going down a road of political correctness where if someone is connected to slavery then that negates any and all contribution they had historically in founding this country? This 20th century mindset that if someone had a slave then their opinion or work on anything is void is a detriment to history. Again, context.
@bunnybird9342
@bunnybird9342 3 ай бұрын
@@ednakelley814 literally no person ever is 100% good or 100% bad. You are allowed to respect and admire certain people but do not glorify or idolize anyone. There was so much anti-intellectualism going on on both sides of this discussion. He who is without sin cast the first stone.
@ednakelley814
@ednakelley814 3 ай бұрын
@@bunnybird9342 That's the problem. Anything postitive said about anyone (all have sin as your cited) is labeld as "glorified".
@bunnybird9342
@bunnybird9342 3 ай бұрын
@@ednakelley814 there are idiots on both sides. On one side, we have people who straight-up glorify these people and treat them like they are mythical god figures. But on the other side, there are anti-intellectuals who want to disregard everything. This is what happened with all of the controversies surrounding memorials after George Floyd's death in 2020. I do agree that there are people who are evil and therefore don't deserve any respect (such as Confederates and conquistadors), but some things went too far.
@davysteak
@davysteak 8 ай бұрын
Over their heads.
@thinkingman2
@thinkingman2 11 жыл бұрын
I always thought that Jefferson stalled on slavery so that he would not lose his African sister-in-law lover who reminded him of his dead wife who he loved more than anything.
@buckrogers8661
@buckrogers8661 8 жыл бұрын
I'm a little confused about what party he belonged to . I'm reading John Adams biography the author David McCullough he refers to Jefferson as Republican .can someone enlighten me on the subject?
@autumnleaves8
@autumnleaves8 7 жыл бұрын
His party was called the Democratic-Republican Party so either name is somewhat accurate.
@NotLoganHighestPrimate
@NotLoganHighestPrimate 7 жыл бұрын
He started the Republican party as it was the first peaceful transfer of political power from the Federalists to the Jeffersonian Republicans/Democratic-Republicans or just simply, Republicans. "By 1792, opposition to the policies of the Federalist Party was growing. Led by Secretary of State Thomas Jefferson (1743-1826), critics of the Federalists banded together to form the Republican Party . They were also called Democratic-Republicans or Jeffersonian Republicans."
@theexile6605
@theexile6605 8 жыл бұрын
I'm just glad he didn't title the book, "Jefferson and the Art of Naval Power." Ha. "We don't need a blue water navy, we just need gunboats!" Brilliant. How come Meacham always titles his books with the word "power?" Is it like O'Reilly and the word "killing" every time?
@eliziskin6021
@eliziskin6021 8 жыл бұрын
You know when a conception of history is immature, when you hear what should or shouldn't have been done. Or assuming what a person of the past think about the present.
@zsedcftglkjh
@zsedcftglkjh 8 жыл бұрын
+Eli Ziskin Amen. I get this every week in my Masters history class. The professor says "it is important for us not to impose our 21st sensibilities on the past" right before he calls Abraham Lincoln a modern day communist or the tent revivals of the great awakenings equivalent to modern day rock concerts. So damn lazy.
@SemperFidelis0229
@SemperFidelis0229 10 жыл бұрын
I notice you used many big words in your original comment, which I'm sure you didn't even know the meanings of, and then, in your second one, you simplified your vocabulary... Both of your comments are wrong, I just found the difference between the two interesting.
@SemperFidelis0229
@SemperFidelis0229 10 жыл бұрын
How does that connect with me having no life, exactly? lol
@rebeccasmith9536
@rebeccasmith9536 10 жыл бұрын
Washington , D. C. (Don't Care is what D.C. stands for, concerning Americans!
@mevenstien
@mevenstien Ай бұрын
Ther dilemma of our time is the same as its been for the last hundred years .why are coroporations allowed to exert influence upon our government in any way, shape, or form? Why is the Federal Reserve Bank here,why is the Federal Reserve Bank setting the value of our money ,why is the Federal Reserve Bank lending us our own money at interest? Yes there are more issues but these two issues unresolved are destroying America and have been for over a hundred years now. 🇺🇸 U.S. Constitution article1 section 8 is the cornerstone of protection for U.S. citizens . The Constitution was not defended and we lost it. It must be restored.
@nickharris2120
@nickharris2120 7 жыл бұрын
read Meacham's new book.. the Art of the Fop
@TimMillernapavalleyfilmworks
@TimMillernapavalleyfilmworks 3 жыл бұрын
yawn, i tried reading art of power. I usually try to stay with clay jenkinson. Jefferson hour 👍
@Highlyskeptical
@Highlyskeptical 10 жыл бұрын
I think Google should promote the following 2 things to utterly change the world forever for the average Joe; 1. Automated Quality of Life Use automation and software with renewable sustainable energy and materials to provide a minimum comfortable quality of life for all active citizens (voting, know issues, understands how civilization works and how/why we got here) providing food, water, shelter, electricity, internet, transportation, and anything else necessary for a healthy society so that we have a "passion-based economy", where citizens use their precious minutes on Earth pursuing passions and maybe (but not necessarily) making money (new robot software program, new music/art, etc). A birthright of every human to escape the trap of lost time to acquire basic resources, a fate we've suffered from before caveman times to the 40 hour/week lost time until 65 if lucky today. 2. Indeterminate Life Spans Use biotech to make organs/all body parts except the brain(bladders/heart tissue done now) and relengthen telomeres to substantially prolong existence, giving active citizens the choice of how long they want to pursue their passions. Would require a "1 person chooses to cease to exist/1 person is born" mentality or colonizing new planets to avoid starvation from exponential growth. "I like the dreams of the future better than the history of the past." Thomas Jefferson
@ninxoon30
@ninxoon30 10 жыл бұрын
OH please. U would have a drink with Jefferson because you wrote a book about him. And why write a book about Jeff and not say, Washington or Hamilton? Well, aside from countless bios of this formidable founding fathers, there is the 'good looks factor'. Sure Hamilton is better looking than Jeff, but honestly--Ham looks like a girly pretty guy-- Jeff is more rugged and manly. Not to mention, Jefferson is Mr. Controversial. A great subject for a book. He preached abolition yet he owned slaves. (not to mention slept with Sally and produced a brood) He quoted the bible several times yet he was agnostic or at least deity. Personally, I am looking forward to read the book, I hope your wrote more about the relationship between Ham and Jeff--via Washington. H & J would bicker over attention for Washington like two mistresses and W would always have to please each one separately. Lovely.
@finalfrontier001
@finalfrontier001 9 жыл бұрын
America never had absolutism
@dennislurvey3235
@dennislurvey3235 4 жыл бұрын
Meacham is such a cool head, but too cool at times. He doesn't say anything newsworthy, the quiet part out loud. He glossed over that Jefferson was an atheist and that he was obsessive compulsive. He was so cautious to not say anything slanderous he almost didn't say anything at all.
@Pandajerk86
@Pandajerk86 11 жыл бұрын
Jefferson wouldn't have loved Google that's some bullshit
@bdm1000
@bdm1000 Жыл бұрын
Jon Meacham is an excellent writer and presenter and could have been a wonderful historian. His depiction of Jefferson is a smear in my opinion (as much as could be depicted of such a great man). In a way most Jefferson scholars modify Jefferson one way or another, but you're always closer to the real Jefferson actually studying primary source material written by Jefferson or the people who knew him, but that does not seem to be how Meacham forms his OPINIONS. No one should walk away from a history lecture believing everything told was fact (or even most of what was told).
@CC-jl7jz
@CC-jl7jz Жыл бұрын
Meacham is WOKE!
@thewimpyburger
@thewimpyburger 11 жыл бұрын
first.. sorry
@davj1586
@davj1586 Жыл бұрын
Poor guy willfully chooses to exclude the heritage of faith Jefferson believed
@robdow6348
@robdow6348 Жыл бұрын
Defining Jefferson by slavery is a rather weak argument. Unless Jon thinks the civil war should have occurred…before we’re a full formed republic. Jon lost me in the climate change virtue signaling. My belief is climate change agenda is morphed from the demise of communism.
@CC-jl7jz
@CC-jl7jz Жыл бұрын
I agree.
@mogem
@mogem 11 жыл бұрын
How was this guy able to make a speech about an immensely important character so damn boring? Is his writing as bad?
@carolbennett1427
@carolbennett1427 2 жыл бұрын
Turns out I think meacham is a sell out. I find him a shallow person
@CC-jl7jz
@CC-jl7jz Жыл бұрын
He sold out to the Marxist Democrats not realizing he means nothing to them. He's just a useful tool.
Jon Meacham Interview: The Power of History in Shaping the Present
1:33:17
Video Replay: Jon Meacham on Andrew Jackson
1:06:47
National Constitution Center
Рет қаралды 54 М.
Пранк пошел не по плану…🥲
00:59
Саша Квашеная
Рет қаралды 5 МЛН
KINDNESS ALWAYS COME BACK
00:59
dednahype
Рет қаралды 168 МЛН
What it feels like cleaning up after a toddler.
00:40
Daniel LaBelle
Рет қаралды 75 МЛН
Jon Meacham - Thomas Jefferson: The Art of Power
1:15:50
Helmke Library
Рет қаралды 15 М.
AHD  Jon Meacham on Thomas Jefferson
56:10
Abraham Lincoln Book Shop, Inc.
Рет қаралды 8 М.
Thinking, Fast and Slow | Daniel Kahneman | Talks at Google
1:02:27
Talks at Google
Рет қаралды 2 МЛН
Jon Meacham: "Thomas Jefferson - The Art of Power"
49:06
Hauenstein Center
Рет қаралды 20 М.
Daniel Goleman on Focus: The Secret to High Performance and Fulfilment
1:18:17
Intelligence Squared
Рет қаралды 7 МЛН
A Lens on Present Day America: Abraham Lincoln and the Struggle for Democracy
1:03:14
Pinnacle Point: Jon Meacham
1:02:16
WatchPNFP
Рет қаралды 7 М.
Part -1| Steve Jobs by Walter Isaacson Audiobook | Niladri's Audiobook
1:16:55
Niladri's Audiobooks
Рет қаралды 52 М.
Пранк пошел не по плану…🥲
00:59
Саша Квашеная
Рет қаралды 5 МЛН