TrueBeedrill same

TrueBeedrill sammeeee

TrueBeedrill :)

TrueBeedrill *J* A *M* I *L* T *O* N

lol

LOL TRUE!!!

*same

Actually it's not the same argument. The argument has been reframed and today has nothing to do with the system the founders tried to make. The British actually retook the country and now use it as an extension of their empire. The founders were against empire all together. Do you hear anyone questioning the American Empire today? Everything has changed and the oligarchs have retaken the country and the people are to ignorant to know the difference.

Brian Bailey Federalist are Democrats, Democratic-Republicans are Republicans

A consolidated government...more efficient? Hahaha. What government is efficient at anything other than consolidating power to itself?

I'm dying

jesusthroughmary "Thomas, that's the problem. They see Burr as a less extreme you. You need to change course, a key endorsement might redeem you."

BlueBird858 "Who did you have in mind?"

OhhKarma don't laugh. you must to work on the same staff

Whaaaaat it might be nice it might be nice to get Hamilton on your side

Yes!

HE WAS A ROTHCHILDS FRONT MAN DO FINANCIAL HISTORY HE WAS A TRAITOR T JEFFERSON JUST COULDNT PROVE IT🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸

+Jessica Marrero Very glad to be able to help a non-traditional student!

Mr. Beat's Social Studies Channel Great to hear, my friend!

It all makes sense now! You’re a public servant! That’s rich

***** I share your disdain for our current political culture... There aren't many true Jeffersonians left in the halls of government - that's for sure!

The ordinary jackass holds a lot of blame as well. Typical people want "freedom for me, not for thee", and will vote themselves free crap. They don't pay attention to stuff that doesn't effect them. It is impossible to keep up.

One also has to take into account that from the end of the War Between the States and the WW1 the State Militias were basically dissolved into a Federalised U.S. armed forces taking all but a whimper of power from the people and states and morphing right back into the same sort of faction we fought against in the Revolution. States forced to remain in a union by bayonet. When that happens "the apathy of citizens" holds little if any value. At that point all you have left is another Rome awaiting it's Nero.

These are wise words, enterprising men quote em, don't act surprised you guys, cos I wrote em ;D

Owwww, but Hamilton forgets his plan would have the government assume state debts.

To learn about Hamilton you could just listen to the music

Stream Fall OWH,BUT HAMILTON FORGES HIS PLAN WOULD HAVE THE GOVERNMENT ASSUME STAEDTLER DEBT PLACE YOUR BETS TO WHO THAT BE IF IT'S THE VERY SEAT OF GOVERNMENT WHERE HAMILTON SITS.

NOT TRUE!

@Kara Webber IN VIRGINIA, WE PLANT SEEDS IN THE GROUND. WE CREATE, YOU JUST WANNA MOVE OUR MONEY AROUND. THIS FINANCIAL PLAN IS AN OUTRAGEOUS DEMAND, AND IT'S TOO MANY D**N PAGES FOR ANYONE TO UNDERSTAND!

@@sorrynotsorry6 stand with me in the land of the free, and pray to god we never see Hamilton's candidacy. Look, when Britain taxed our tea we got frisky. Imagine what's gonna happen when you try to tax our whiskey

@@Emma-iv6ug Thank you secretary Jefferson. Secretary Hamilton, your response.

me too

+Mlp Melody Strokes Manage to have a goddAMN AFFAIR AND GET HIS SON KILLED AND GET SHOT IN A DUEL AND GOSH DANGIT MAKE US SO DANG EMOTIONAL DURING WHO LIVES WHO DIES WHO TELLS YOUR STORY

Ya i looked up thomas jefferson hamilton musical

+Mlp Melody Strokes go on and on grow into more of a phenomenon...

Didn't even cross my mind. You know, because I'm listening to the video.

Does anyone even know anything about Hamilton or how central banks screw all americans?

+Jagga Yeah, students have it so much easier than we had it and I doubt many of them recognize that. I'm glad you found this helpful!

That's for sure about KZfaq. My college professors finally started integrating it in my second to last year of college (2013). It was a great benefit. Keep up the great work of integrating technology with education. It makes it much more real and fun!

Mr. Beat's Social Studies Channel STORY TIME! Great hook with the money... and gotta love that teacher pay! Haha

Mr. Beat's Social Studies Channel GREAT STUFF! I definitely will use this!

Heck yeah!

taylor 915 I think so

You payed your debts because you don't pay for labour!

didn't majority farmers not even have the wealth to own slaves

@@harmanjotsingh4230 Doesn't matter. This is how liberal white women display their allegiance to the church of wokeness. The funniest day in the world is going to be when , after shitting all over everything to do with the USA for decades, and contributing MIGHTILY to the division and instability that finally topples the country, OP, as well as scores of millions of people just like her finally begin to understand the level of overt racism that will exist now that China is the untouchable global hegemon again. Not only do the Çhin ese greatly dislike .... "African people's," but they're going to exact revenge for a period of time they refer to as the "century of humiliation," for which they view the west as solely to blame for... The blacks will be enslaved all over again, and people like her will count themselves lucky if they're able to just toil in silent fear and regret for the world they helped create... The one silver lining is that THEN her wokeness will finally be cured

@@pepesilvia3490 looks like that century of humiliation has begun some time ago with the marxist blm

+ClaymoreLinx The war in Iraq against the tyrant Saddam is a splendid example of Jeffersonian policy. Also the war in Kosovo. Then you have the first amendment too.

+Momchil92 Jeffersonian policies were isolationist. Don't compare the Iraq war to him.

TroopSwordSkits To the contrary, he believed in spreading the revolution and encouraging it elsewhere. He wanted the US to help France during their revolution, he went to war against the Ottomans in Africa. He liked to stay out when monarchies fought each other but this is not isolationism. It's the blissful state of derivation of joy from the mutual self-destruction of your ideological enemies. Don't forget that the US was in a way already isolated by virtue of being both far away from Europe as well as for its being the only republic at the time.

Mom you need to check your history, and chill92. No one knows how TJ would act in this day and age. Don't claim to know more than you do, it's immature.

Ive two words for the fed...Aaron Burr !

for now anyways lol

Hamilton sought power. People who seek power tend to be the ones who get it, so eventually most of his desired measures won out, yeah, even if it took more than 100 years for all of his goals to be realized (with the Federal Reserve and whatnot). People who oppose centralized institutions of power, like the Jeffersonians, tend to get involved in centralized institutions of power much less frequently... It's really quite inevitable.

Spoiler: Hamilton was shot down like the traitor he was.... Thanks Mr. Burr

lol thx i wasn't paying attention

Unfortunately

And that the federal reserve is not backed by gold ....

not sure if that is relevent, Andrew Jackson got ride of Hamilton's model, so anything that happened after Jackson removed the federal bank, Hamilton had nothing to do with.

@@josephcox3091 ok thank you for telling me

Joseph Cox Actual Jefferson himself got rid of the Hamilton model the moment he brought in his own guy Albert Galliatin.

@@TNTITAN I don't think your correct, the Hamiltonian Bank system was referred to as the First and Second Bank of the United States, there were two, Hamilton created the first, James Madison charted the second during his presidency after the first's charter was not renewed in 18011 during his presidency, and modeled the second after the first 5 years later during his second term, and James Madison's presidency came after Thomas Jefferson, so it was Actually Andrew Jackson that dismantled the Hamiltonian model by dismantling the second Hamiltonian bank called the Second Bank of the United States with his "Bank Wars". Thomas Jefferson although he disagreed could did not dismantle the bank, the charter actually ended during Madison's first term and then made the second bank during his second term based off the Hamiltonian system.

GLAD TO HEAR IT! :D

hehe im not

Hamilton feared Civil War. He was right about that. Jefferson knew slavery was like "holding a wolf by the ear", yet he did nothing to move Virginia away from it.

+Lexi McNoogut Thanks! :D Glad I could help you learn something and have a little fun doing it!

katiefershadybaby Thank you on all counts! :D

Tom Richey You are welcome :)

He's married

Filipinogenetics Glad I could help you! I was planning on waiting until I could do something more elaborate for this topic, but this seems to be hitting the spot for a lot of people.

Ahaha I've been sleeping in and missing my U.S. History college course and on this was on the powerpoint notes, so this video really helped me out since I learn topics for every course better on KZfaq aha

hysuka2 Glad I could help you! XD

Mark-It-8-Dude this guy is a biased idiot Republican Trump supporter who believes in revisionist history smh.

There is an instinct to trace political evolution backward from now rather than to start at the beginning. That’s how notions like Conservatism being innately about small government and Liberalism a big one arise. The associations were reversed in fact at the Founding. The Hamiltonian Federalists represented a kind of Classical Conservatism which saw a strong national government as essential to preserving order. The Jeffersonian Republicans espoused a rigorous Classical Liberalism which perceived it to be an oppressive tool of the elite. As liberal teachings had informed the American Revolution, both camps were influenced by them. They reached consensus on recognizing natural rights, constraining government power, abandoning hereditary titles of nobility as well as the separation of church and state. The Hamiltonians, however, maintained conservative attitudes on central banking, protectionism, restricting immigration and property requirements for the vote. The Jeffersonians championed the liberal ideals of laissez-faire, free trade, open immigration and extending political suffrage to the common man. A nationalist versus internationalist divide emerged which shaped a lot of their disagreements. Perhaps the fiercest ensued when looming conflict around England and France aggravated tensions. Contrary to conventional wisdom, the federal over state position was used for conservative purposes when Federalists passed the Alien and Sedition Acts. Efforts to thwart radicalism that involved putting foreigners under scrutiny. And the anti-federalist stance, albeit complicated by later battles, was applied for liberal ends when Republicans retaliated with the Kentucky and Virginia Resolutions. Decrying them as violations of civil liberties, they asserted that the states could declare federal laws that they deemed unconstitutional void. A big deal in an age of centralized empires. Though the sectional question of slavery shook up the political landscape in a variety of ways, those concepts carried on in essence as the guiding orthodoxies for the modern Republican and Democratic leaderships. But the distinction has been obscured in memory. Take two icons for limited government types who embodied the competing intellectual traditions. Hamiltonianism in the Republican Calvin Coolidge and Jeffersonianism in the Democrat Grover Cleveland. Cleveland vetoed an immigration bill which featured a literacy test as a barrier in 1897 while Coolidge signed into law such a proposal in 1924. Cleveland ran on reducing tariffs while Coolidge kept tariff rates high. Cleveland opposed national banks while Coolidge let the Federal Reserve be. Cleveland set in motion the landmark antitrust lawsuit known as the Sugar Trust Case while Coolidge ended a string of administrations that had launched many of them. Cleveland put into place the Interstate Commerce Commission to protect consumers by overseeing trade while Coolidge appointed to it and the subsequent Federal Trade Commission hands-off commissioners to facilitate economic growth. It is their shared commitment to individualism, low taxes, sound money, balanced budgets and fiscal restraint that attracts the overlapping fans. Increasing demand for government intervention ignited during the Progressive Era blurred the line between the old-fashioned conservatives and liberals weary of it. Their ideas, regardless of the historical rivalry, now tend to get lumped together in the conservative category and pit against Progressivism. It also treated as one thing, usually under the name Liberalism, despite the initial disharmony there as well. The Republican Theodore Roosevelt and Democrat Woodrow Wilson were the first progressive presidents from their parties. Though it was their successors who coined the terms Progressive Conservatism and Progressive Liberalism for their ideologies, each described himself with the pair of labels. Both differed from their classical counterparts with respect to the scope of government, but there are parallels in how they contrasted each other. Comparing Roosevelt and Wilson helps in differentiating between them. Roosevelt akin to Coolidge signed off on measures to curb immigration which included a literacy test in 1903 while Wilson like Cleveland before him rejected legislation of that sort in 1917. As expressed in his 1902 State of the Union Address, Roosevelt advocated protectionism. Wilson, on the other hand, favored free trade. A goal propounded in his Fourteen Points. Both pursued economic regulation. But though dubbed the Trustbuster, Roosevelt was not hostile to monopolies on principle. Approving of what he called good trusts like U.S. Steel. Wilson pushed for the Clayton Antitrust Act in a bid to level the playing field by breaking them all up. The argument between nationalism and internationalism gained a new dimension with their foreign policy opinions. TR believed in the superiority of Anglo-Saxon societies and, as affirmed by his Roosevelt Corollary to the Monroe Doctrine, their duty to police the world. Conversely, Wilson claimed that no nation was fit to sit in judgement of another. His ultimate aim was global governance through the League of Nations. Much like Classical Liberalism, Progressive Conservatism is largely overlooked in these discussions. Observing them can illuminate trends which go back to the First Party System. Conditions created by the Second Industrial Revolution prompted the re-examination of accepted conservative and liberal precepts. Elements of both parties became convinced that government action was needed to remedy escalating unrest. Especially after the rise of the Populist Movement which fought for agrarian and industrial labor interests. The Populists coalesced into the People’s Party until rallying to the Democrat William Jennings Bryan to defy the rich and aid the poor. Republicans such as Roosevelt concluded that reform was necessary to prevent the country from descending into chaos. The key difference was that Bryan’s party selected him as its presidential candidate three times while Roosevelt’s gave him the vice presidency because it was thought that he couldn’t rock the boat there. Only taking office by chance after the assassination of William McKinley. And a greater number of delegates lent their support to the moderate William Howard Taft instead when he attempted to go for a third term. Admirers of Cleveland left to form the National Democratic Party when Bryan came out on top in 1896. Likewise, Roosevelt and his followers walked out to organize the original Progressive Party after Taft received the nomination in 1912. Each split benefited the other major party and they quickly declined. Internal debates persisted, but precedents were set. Though Bryan never won, Wilson acted on several of his causes. And Franklin Roosevelt actually endorsed Wilson, not Teddy, in 1912. He built on his prototypical administrative state with the New Deal. An agenda of then unmatched government activism. In keeping with Warren G. Harding and Coolidge’s Post-Wilson Return to Normalcy, Republicans led by Robert Taft worked at rolling it back. The election of Dwight Eisenhower marked a truce. His philosophy of Dynamic Conservatism made peace with the New Deal zeitgeist, but he sought to rein in any excesses. The further turns within the Democratic and Republican parties are clear-cut. The New Left and New Right adopted by George McGovern and Ronald Reagan both challenged the popular assumptions of their day. Focusing on social issues and government control. The Third Way and Compassionate Conservatism advanced by Bill Clinton and George W. Bush both moved toward the center. Reflecting upon the free market and social justice. Each establishment now confronts a populist wave. Democratic Socialism and National Conservatism are embraced by those that Bernie Sanders and Donald Trump have emboldened. Fed up with the ruling class, both aspire to tilt the balance of power. Granted, each from early on housed factions that spanned the political spectrum. Of note are those epitomized by the Democrat John C. Calhoun and Republican Horace Greeley. Calhoun defended the status quo for Southern planters while Greeley promoted Utopian Socialism. The two served as prominent party figures up until they, alongside other dissidents, were faced with critical disputes which drove them apart. Calhoun set up the Nullifier Party after a bitter falling-out with Andrew Jackson due to him standing by the federal government in a mounting crisis with South Carolina over the Tariff of 1828. Greeley ran as the Liberal Republican Party nominee against Ulysses S. Grant in the election of 1872 in protest of scandals in his administration tied to big business. But not even allying with their partisan adversaries, the Nullifiers with the Whigs and the Liberal Republicans with the Democrats, was enough to defeat Jackson or Grant. Most of their members soon dispersed among them both. Friction lingered between right-leaning Republican and left-leaning Democratic national parties and the left-wing Republicans and right-wing Democrats holding considerable sway at the state level with whom they compromised. The La Follette Wisconsin Republican and Talmadge Georgia Democratic machines were examples which came to blows with the Coolidge Campaign and FDR Administration. More infrastructure development coupled with gradual modernization led to the regions converging economically and culturally. That resulted in Republicans and Democrats amassing vast majorities of conservatives and liberals. Broadly speaking, along small town and big city lines. Both have indeed changed with time, quibbled over details and contained shifting coalitions. But their values remain fundamentally rooted in Hamiltonian pro-business conservative nationalism and Jeffersonian anti-elitist liberal internationalism.

You're gonna need congressional approval and you don't have the votes

It's a work in progress - should be available on the unit page on my website but I only display finished products on my PowerPoints page.

Gotcha. I use what you have posted. I'll use what I've been using for JvH. My kids love you, btw. I'm not just a thief. But your powerpoints give me ideas that I'd never had and then I tweak them to fit my own sense of humor. And kids think we're related. "Miss, he your brother?" I hear at the end when your picture comes up.