Sign up for a free 7-day trial of the Demon: www.lsatdemon.com/demon/start Get access to all our lesson videos in LSAT Demon: www.lsatdemon.com
Пікірлер: 13
@noora3211 Жыл бұрын
i really wish i could attend his classes in person
@vv51794 жыл бұрын
A Correlation verb is stationary, it is not affecting the who/what in the premise, it is just in there, hanging out in the sentence. A Causation verb took is taking action (or took action) the who/what IS doing something, there is movement.
@JinnLLC Жыл бұрын
What I have learned here is order of wording and exactly how information is displayed can change how that information is perceived.
@jatinder_7163 жыл бұрын
Your videos are very helpful sir
@FortressMT6 ай бұрын
Very helpful. Ty.
@sciencefordreamers2115 Жыл бұрын
Very cool teacher!
@hzLooster3 жыл бұрын
I get that in the car situation, the necessary is being confused for the sufficient, and that’s the answer we should look out for. But would another answer to look for be: the sufficient is being confused for the necessary?
@Trynottoblink2 жыл бұрын
Yes, because confusing sufficient with necessary entails confusing necessary with sufficient, and vice versa. So for a flaw question the correct answer could be either one.
@jatinder_7163 жыл бұрын
Sir,if we can get your lectures live?? We can't reach out to anyone and i found this channel ,so could you help us out?😥
@briannap75752 жыл бұрын
He teaches through lsat demon (it’s a website) and has a podcast thinking lsat!
@jatinder_7163 жыл бұрын
Plzz ,if you can teach by picking up a question as an example ,it will be more easy !!
@willjensen5595Ай бұрын
So smoking increasing the likelihood of one having cancer by 5% is a CAUSAL claim. Yet, the claim that "people who smoke are more likely to get lung cancer" is CORRELATIVE. It seems to me the only difference between these is the quantification of these likelihoods. I can't imagine that it is a statement having numbers or not as being the deciding factor here. So what am I missing?