Three most common flaws in Logical Reasoning

  Рет қаралды 14,885

Strategy Prep

Strategy Prep

5 жыл бұрын

Sign up for a free 7-day trial of the Demon:
www.lsatdemon.com/demon/start
Get access to all our lesson videos in LSAT Demon:
www.lsatdemon.com

Пікірлер: 13
@noora3211
@noora3211 Жыл бұрын
i really wish i could attend his classes in person
@vv5179
@vv5179 4 жыл бұрын
A Correlation verb is stationary, it is not affecting the who/what in the premise, it is just in there, hanging out in the sentence. A Causation verb took is taking action (or took action) the who/what IS doing something, there is movement.
@JinnLLC
@JinnLLC Жыл бұрын
What I have learned here is order of wording and exactly how information is displayed can change how that information is perceived.
@jatinder_716
@jatinder_716 3 жыл бұрын
Your videos are very helpful sir
@FortressMT
@FortressMT 6 ай бұрын
Very helpful. Ty.
@sciencefordreamers2115
@sciencefordreamers2115 Жыл бұрын
Very cool teacher!
@hzLooster
@hzLooster 3 жыл бұрын
I get that in the car situation, the necessary is being confused for the sufficient, and that’s the answer we should look out for. But would another answer to look for be: the sufficient is being confused for the necessary?
@Trynottoblink
@Trynottoblink 2 жыл бұрын
Yes, because confusing sufficient with necessary entails confusing necessary with sufficient, and vice versa. So for a flaw question the correct answer could be either one.
@jatinder_716
@jatinder_716 3 жыл бұрын
Sir,if we can get your lectures live?? We can't reach out to anyone and i found this channel ,so could you help us out?😥
@briannap7575
@briannap7575 2 жыл бұрын
He teaches through lsat demon (it’s a website) and has a podcast thinking lsat!
@jatinder_716
@jatinder_716 3 жыл бұрын
Plzz ,if you can teach by picking up a question as an example ,it will be more easy !!
@willjensen5595
@willjensen5595 Ай бұрын
So smoking increasing the likelihood of one having cancer by 5% is a CAUSAL claim. Yet, the claim that "people who smoke are more likely to get lung cancer" is CORRELATIVE. It seems to me the only difference between these is the quantification of these likelihoods. I can't imagine that it is a statement having numbers or not as being the deciding factor here. So what am I missing?
LSAT Flaw questions (unhappy life)
11:25
Strategy Prep
Рет қаралды 10 М.
LSAT | Logical Reasoning | Inference vs. strengthen (eat horse)
20:40
THEY made a RAINBOW M&M 🤩😳 LeoNata family #shorts
00:49
LeoNata Family
Рет қаралды 39 МЛН
THE POLICE TAKES ME! feat @PANDAGIRLOFFICIAL #shorts
00:31
PANDA BOI
Рет қаралды 25 МЛН
A clash of kindness and indifference #shorts
00:17
Fabiosa Best Lifehacks
Рет қаралды 77 МЛН
Вечный ДВИГАТЕЛЬ!⚙️ #shorts
00:27
Гараж 54
Рет қаралды 14 МЛН
Flaws - Logical Reasoning and Logic Games are the same
17:22
Strategy Prep
Рет қаралды 16 М.
Necessary Assumptions vs. Sufficient Assumptions (golf)
31:44
Strategy Prep
Рет қаралды 29 М.
Two biggest LSAT mistakes on test day
19:44
Strategy Prep
Рет қаралды 17 М.
LSAT | Conditional statements (trash cans)
22:20
Strategy Prep
Рет қаралды 16 М.
Famous Flaws | LSAT Logical Reasoning
24:50
LSAT Lab
Рет қаралды 55 М.
LSAT | Destroy the argument
15:57
Strategy Prep
Рет қаралды 34 М.
Get faster on the LSAT
11:30
Strategy Prep
Рет қаралды 21 М.
Must Be True | LSAT Logical Reasoning
26:51
LSAT Lab
Рет қаралды 51 М.
LSAT | Logical Reasoning review (Metro rider)
29:34
Strategy Prep
Рет қаралды 7 М.
Weaken | LSAT Logical Reasoning
27:42
LSAT Lab
Рет қаралды 33 М.
THEY made a RAINBOW M&M 🤩😳 LeoNata family #shorts
00:49
LeoNata Family
Рет қаралды 39 МЛН