What does AC Frequency adjustment really do in TIG welding? Sit back, relax, and listen to This Old Tony go completely off the rails.
Пікірлер: 611
@weldingtipsandtricks7 жыл бұрын
Very thought provoking video. Great job
@ThisOldTony7 жыл бұрын
Thanks Jody, always good to have you popping by.
@baranarslan86046 жыл бұрын
You might be getting these results because of square waves. It may change with saw profile or sine waves. Because in some electric motor changing frequency for example increasing it increases the speed of the motor so we can say increasing sine frequency increases the power. But i guess in square wave its much more about duty cycle. But i am not sure since i am not an EE but ME.
@bentlikeitsmaker6 жыл бұрын
yea agreed im more thinking it would also depend on tungsten prep as well so maby a different combination with a bit different ac balance thats the thing with these new machines so many different combos as i sit here considering an everlast unit
@nicholaskruft31896 жыл бұрын
I have a feeling 200a on most if not all welders does not mean 200a rms, and therefore the actual power delivered is not the same between DC and the highest frequency setting on the welder. Apples to oranges. Welds looked prettier than mine though, maybe I need to involve AC and maybe some helium with my normal lift start routine
@bigrockets4 жыл бұрын
@@nicholaskruft3189 I think you are right on the money here Nicholas. the useable or functional part of ANY sine wave is its 70.7% of peak to peak voltage, or its RMS (ROOT MEAN SQUARE) value. The rms value of is a function of arc voltage and current, one is dependentvon the other. For example lets forget about amps right now. lets look ai it in terms of voltage. If we have an AC wave with a peak to peak value of 200 VAC , at rms the voltage value is 141 VAC not 200. The rms value is what everything downstream from the tungston is "seeing", not 200 volts. Ohms law says the amps (I) = e/r . r being resistance in ohms. This would be all the resistance from the metal, the tungston, any microscopic dust particles, and impurities.1.1 ohms would be good resistance in an established plasma arc. dropping e to its real world rms value of 154 VAC / 1.1 ohms value of r yeilds 140 amps not 200 at the arc. However this seems to be skewed a bit much by 60 amps? Seems to me the welder maufacturers would look at this and compensate for it, unless my math and ohms law is suddenly haywire? perhaps my math is? just thinking out loud here is all folks. lol!!
@philchadwick94705 жыл бұрын
It all depends on the age of the aluminium, if it's over 40 it won't be able to hear the higher frequencies, so the higher the frequency the less it will notice.
@amanofmanyparts91204 жыл бұрын
It won't be doing too well with the lower frequencies - under 50Hz! Boom. Tish.
@chaztiz88392 жыл бұрын
I resent that at 60 I don't even know what you are talking about,,, go brandon
@MyJp1983 Жыл бұрын
Do me a favor - don't ever change, stay just the way you are
@PracticalEngineeringChannel7 жыл бұрын
TIG with TOT should be a series
@toddsmash5 жыл бұрын
Hey This Old Tony, tangent thing I wasn't sure you knew: I noticed your cracked nail in the video. Get some CA Glue, put a droplet on you nail and then put a tissue (facial) on the drop. Let it dry. Remove excess tissue and then get your wife's nail file or one of those lathe files you've mentioned and sand the patch smooth. It's kinda like fixing fibre glass. Source: my Mum was a nail technician for more than forty years and I suck at hammers.
@HenryPiffpaff4 жыл бұрын
Is that why your name is toddsmash?
@OlTrailDog Жыл бұрын
Interesting. I noticed a compulsive nail biter who undoubtedly stinks like spit all the time.
@toddsmash Жыл бұрын
@@HenryPiffpaff Sorry for the very very late reply. Unfortunately I am one of the clumsiest people I know.
@sarchlalaith883611 ай бұрын
@@toddsmash Pro tip, forget the tissue since you scrape most of it off, instead, put only fractionally more ca than you need and sprinkle baking powder on top {or bi carb} It'll make the ca super hard and then file down, it'll be a long while before that nail breaks again {source helicopter technicians use this to temp repair damaged blades}
@toddsmash11 ай бұрын
@@sarchlalaith8836 never heard of that one but I'll try it next. Thanks mate!
@tomstr217 жыл бұрын
You know it's TOT's video when you hit the like button before it even starts! Thanks Tony
@harperwillis54477 жыл бұрын
The skin effect actually does appear at pretty low frequencies [1]. The skin effect at 200 Hz is as low as 4-5 mm in a plasma. With square waves there will be higher harmonics and the depth will be even smaller. Higher frequency will cause power to concentrate in the outside of the arc cone. That extra heat on the outside will dissipate a lot more before getting into the metal, and indirectly widen the arc very slightly as heat on the outside will generate a little extra plasma from the surrounding cool gas. Say you're running at 2000 Hz with a square wave and your overall skin depth is 1 mm. If the arc is 4 mm wide, the power in the center is 20x lower than the power on the very edge of the arc. At that point it might as well be off. At 200 Hz the difference will probably be closer to ~20%, but that's still a huge difference and the overall heat into the weld will be reduced a lot as well. Since power is concentrated on the outside of the cone it doesn't have an insulating later between it and outside air and it radiates faster. The reason skin effect is usually neglected at low frequencies is that the overall power dissipation doesn't change much until higher frequencies, and wires are much thinner than a GTAW arc. Electrical engineers don't care much if a wire has 10% more resistance than expected, but when you're welding a 10% change in settings can be a big problem.
@slep50397 жыл бұрын
Two videos in as many days? I must be dreaming.
@2lefThumbs7 жыл бұрын
Ceazar Carr or it could be vacation time in Italy, and the kids are playing gokarts under the wife's supervision :)
@geraldgepes7 жыл бұрын
2LeftThumbs meanwhile all inbound shipments from Europe are late and the shops floor is immaculate.
@verdatum7 жыл бұрын
I was about to comment the same thing. Pace yourself, Tony!
@RexusKing7 жыл бұрын
When did he say he lives in Italy !? I assume he grew up in USA, then moved to Italy?
@patricelebrasseur56497 жыл бұрын
i always tought he was living in norway or sweden, he even have a pile of firewood
@NoVanity13 жыл бұрын
I do a lot of pipe welding with an extended land bevel which is similar to the grooves you welded in. I always go high frequency on the root to prevent the puddle from spilling outside the bevel, then I go low frequency on my fill and cover pass.
@sl1200mk027 жыл бұрын
the machine is most likely not producing a perfect square wave, there is a slight ramp in the cycle switch, the slower frequency allows for a longer time at max amperage while the higher frequency spends more of the overall duty cycle in the transition between positive and negative
@sl1200mk027 жыл бұрын
at least that's how I remember it from vo-tech welding program back in the early 90s
@ZakKarimjee7 жыл бұрын
Cory Allison this seems very likely to me too, especially given the large voltages involved the ramp times will be high. I guess the plasma also has some capacitance which will add to that.
@slep50397 жыл бұрын
I was thinking the same thing
@MandolinMan00017 жыл бұрын
Got there before me!
@Arnthorg7 жыл бұрын
time to get the o'l smelloscope into the equation
@MandolinMan00017 жыл бұрын
Hey Tony! Electronic Engineer here - I think your statement at 8:35 ish might be off. I doubt it's a square wave. Probably more of a trapezoid shaped wave, with a set rise time based on the voltage you're running, humidity, quality of grounding and so on. That rise time will be the same at 20Hz and 200Hz. And probaly takes a few milliseconds. Therefore at higher frequencies instead of hitting the flat at the top of the trapezoid, it's either sloping up halfway, before sloping down again, or just spending less time at the top, so the integral yields less energy to the work. Great video as usual!
@allenomak7 жыл бұрын
Fellow electrical engineer here. Since the output of the welder is a (somewhat) square wave, is it possible that the higher frequency over-tones of the wave may play a role? Can the skin effect and other inductive losses come into play in higher frequencies that the fundamental frequency?
@MandolinMan00017 жыл бұрын
Interesting theory, although I have a feeling that because the tip of the electrode is held just over the grounded work and sparks fly (!) There must be some amount of capacitance which would account for the delay in charging up over the cycle. The plasma gap and the voltage difference effectively create a RC circuit? You could be right though, L might rear its head.
@StripeyType7 жыл бұрын
Probably also ringing like a carillon on Christmas.
@EvenTheDogAgrees7 жыл бұрын
Not an electrical engineer here, so I may be way off, but here's another take on it that may also play a role in what's being observed: let's assume a perfect square or sine wave where the only difference is the frequency. At the lower frequency, electrons have more time between wave reversals to travel through the material. Therefore they travel further, causing more heat. The higher the frequency, the less far they travel before having to turn back. At the upper limit, infinite frequency, they don't move at all (at least, not as a result of the AC wave). Could this play a role in explaining why at higher frequencies you need to raise the current to get the same heat?
@ikbendusan7 жыл бұрын
maybe it's because it's warming the metal for 5 ms at a time at 200 Hz and 50 ms at a time at 20 Hz; 200 Hz gives a more stable temperature, 20 Hz makes a bigger puddle
@soulsolutions39995 жыл бұрын
Tony, I am new to Tig welding, don't even have a tig welder but want to start. I am so appreciative of your documentation because you have managed to explain AC frequency to a chef! Damn bro, I love your style. Keep up the good work
@SmartShocks7 жыл бұрын
Hi Tony. In my work as a EE my experience has been that the skin effect at the frequencies you speak of is negligible. While I am no expert I believe that it is indeed the cone width that is controlling the energy density of the plasma and thereby producing a wider or more narrow weld bead. The reason the two cones looked the same in your video, regardless of the discharge frequency used, is because you are looking at the photons emitted when the electrons supplied by the welder recombine with the argon ions. However, I don't think that those photons are actually representative of the energy flow/density within the plasma beam. What you need in order to see energy flow in the plasma beam is a camera that can see electrons, or better yet heat. If you don't have either try googling "energy density in AC discharge induced plasma flows". The results of that search should have a few such heat pictures of plasma beams. What you will see is that inner cones (that can't be visually isolated based only on the light they give off) do change and that as a result the heat signature of the plasma flow changes drastically as well. The smoking gun in your experiments was not what the plasma flow looked like on the camera, but rather the characteristics of those little pits in the base metal. They were more spread out in the case of the lower frequency sample. That's because those multiple "cathode sites" formed based on the energy density of the beam. They are the tell tail sign of where the beam was the hottest, and how close or far apart they are seams to correlate well with the frequency of the plasma discharge that produced them. I have no idea if I am correct or not, so please consider my theory as just another possible explanation. Ohh, and please keep making videos! I love them, and they are very uplifting whenever I enter a bout of depression. I watch them, and then struggle out to the shop to build something and then I start to feel better. So thanks for that gift!!!!
@pretendingpro4 жыл бұрын
I think the skin effect does come into play here. Look at the design of induction motor rotors. The shape of the shunt bars make a big difference in speed-torque-curves due to the skin effect. An Overview: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Squirrel-cage_rotor
@Blake-jl8lh3 жыл бұрын
@@pretendingpro at such low frequency it wont make much of a difference.
@boots78593 жыл бұрын
I would agree, strictly speaking the skin effect at such low freq is negligible. Total power going into the weld is some product of Hertz, Volt-Amps, and travel speed. I would bet that using a piece 1/2 - 1/4 the thickness, a nice weld could be made at 200hz with a faster travel speed. Its all a trade-off, like everything in life.
@mem-ed8zt7 жыл бұрын
Tony you spoil us with frequent videos
@maidenrulz737 жыл бұрын
Unlike everyone else commenting....I have no idea what you (or they) are talking about....but it held my attention for 13:13
@buildmotion14267 жыл бұрын
You're an epic teacher Tony. I've had trouble with aluminum boxes. I'll give this a try!
@1977jmad7 жыл бұрын
Holy Toledo that was the quickest 13 minutes ever! Thanks Bud that was awesome!
@mike-lu8di7 жыл бұрын
Good stuff Tony, very helpful....would like to see more...thumbs up from me...excellent explanation. 6061 his welding is the Mona lisa of welding....he turns his welds into an art form.
@60616 жыл бұрын
4:17 Couldn't have said it better myself. The AC frequency adjustment is highly overrated.
@williammoore49426 жыл бұрын
6061. com you are the welder i stive to be, ive watched all your videos 5 times each since getting my tig like 8 months ago
@weldingjunkie5 жыл бұрын
You mean highly adjustable LOL or highly a sales gimmick
@raulduke855 жыл бұрын
i find the noise of the ac arc less annoying at higher frequency: for me it's a reason good enough to weld over 150 hz xD
@weldingjunkie5 жыл бұрын
raulduke85 60hrz is just fine for anyone to weld aluminum
@raulduke855 жыл бұрын
@@weldingjunkie i know, it's my job o.O I just said that the noise produced by the ac arc at lower frequencies is annoying to me, so I use higher frequencies, between 150 and 190 generally. It may sound stupid to you, but since i have to weld alu 8/10 hours per day for the next 30 years, an annoying noise that i can avoid is more than a good reason to set frequency higher.
@zimone51846 жыл бұрын
Great blog @This Old Tony. informative and entertaining!!!
@BuffaloBillsSon7 жыл бұрын
Hay tony, I started watching your videos only the other month. The ones about making a chainsaw go cart and now I'm bloody hooked! They are just so enjoyably good! Keep making them and I'll keep watching thanks!
@wilson25316 жыл бұрын
Tony, excellent work on this one...helps a lot
@Engineerd3d7 жыл бұрын
wow, 2 videos in 1 week. Love it! Thank you for sharing this info.
@Roarman573 жыл бұрын
I’m teaching myself how to tig right now (literally I’m at the bench) and I found this video very helpful!
@DOSputin5 жыл бұрын
@8:00 it clicked in my head. As I'm listening to your description, i'm thinking about my experiences with high power audio. Low frequency sound penetrates walls, while high frequencies reflect off the surface of the wall. Eureka! Of course this principal would extend to the frequency of the AC current, and it's ability to penetrate through or reflect off the skin of our materials. Great video as always! Thanks.
@lewisheard18827 жыл бұрын
Love the explanations you give!
@claeswikberg89587 жыл бұрын
oh oh oh oh,TOT's released a new video, clicked, liked sat back and enjoyed :)
@RRINTHESHOP7 жыл бұрын
An excellent practical demo of the HF effect.
@akc71007 жыл бұрын
Jody is pretty awesome. Welding tips and tricks has a Lot of good videos
@longevitywelding7 жыл бұрын
Hi Tony! Nice explanation on the differences in the AC frequency
@longshot7897 жыл бұрын
So many videos! Marvelous!
@thewallace444 жыл бұрын
Pictures, draw a picture. Then my head doesn't hurt quite so much. Great video. Keep it up.
@Gavreeli7 жыл бұрын
Just want say I agree with your experience. When I was welding aluminum regularly at my old job we would bump up the frequency to get the best penetration we could into the roots of our corner joints and more control on edges.
@JBFromOZ7 жыл бұрын
Useful to understand this, I'm a pictures over words guy, allows me to have a useful way to tweak the knobs and pretend I know enough to be dangerous! Thanks Tony
@Bassalicious5 жыл бұрын
Great video - I really appreciate the upfront honesty. I really learned something: Not to trust people who seem too confident in their non-explainable beliefs about welding especially. I never understood people who are just learning stuff by heart but have no clue why or how they are working. It's like remembering every single outcome of every single equation without ever doing actual calculations. That just feels wrong and dumb to me.
@eformance7 жыл бұрын
Experience has told me that FREQUENCY has more to do with how much energy you get into the metal. A higher frequency will take longer to heat the metal and the puddle will freeze somewhat faster. The lower the frequency, the more energy is put into the metal and the puddle is somewhat slower to freeze. The frequency is tuned to fine adjust the amount of energy put into the weld puddle. Again, this is just *my* personal experience with welding Aluminum.
@BigBear--4 жыл бұрын
Soooo...like the lower frequency gives u a wider puddle with less penetration down and slightly lower crown, but more penetration sideways (cause of the wider puddle/arc); while a higher frequency gives you a tighter puddle and more penetration down with a slightly higher crown. In simple terms one might even just say that a lower frequency gives you a wider arc, while a higher frequency gives you a tighter arc...like you know...99% of all welding videos on KZfaq regarding AC aluminum welding. I love TOT, but this was 😆🤣 Though I gotta say, some of the best actual puddle footage on KZfaq, something so many can’t get right. I loved the previous video on general Tig advice, that slow-mo footage of the puddle moving around while the torch was still, and pointing straight down, was priceless.
@timothyball31444 жыл бұрын
I also remember things better when I understand them better.
@07Stylist7 жыл бұрын
this is the perfect video to fall asleep too at night
@mikeeagle26533 жыл бұрын
Great video tony 🙌🏻🙌🏻
@DanTheFordFixer7 жыл бұрын
Interesting I always have used higher frequency settings, I'll have to try turning it down, excellent video.
@justus19957 жыл бұрын
3 videos in 1 week ? Could live with that 😁
@DasGramma7 жыл бұрын
i have no clue what u do there BUT i love ur videos ... i keep telling tomyself: maybe i learn something which i could use sometimes
@fredstephens14597 жыл бұрын
Ok Tony, this is great stuff and definitely helps me when thinking about AC frequency. Now, its time to add pulse settings to the mix :)
@ThisOldTony7 жыл бұрын
Thanks Fred.. one step at a time! :)
@mikenorton53827 жыл бұрын
Didn't see anyone else mention this so thought I would chime in with a thought: electric pixies aside, if you apply an oscillatory heat source to an object, the extent to which that heat penetrates the material will depend on the frequency. Think of it as a thermal-skin effect. For flat plates this decay goes as exp(-d * sqrt(pi*f/a)) where d is the distance from the surface, f is frequency, and a is the thermal diffusivity. I'm getting skin depths on the order of a few mm so I think this makes sense. The key here is that it matches intuition, higher frequencies, smaller boundary effect. Not saying there aren't other physics, but I bet this is a piece of it. *Correction* I think this is complimenting Sharky's explanation
@wnebergall7 жыл бұрын
Me and my Bar Z bash welder thank you for the help their Tony
@Moparmaga-14 жыл бұрын
Thank you, I'm just learning so that was very informative
@MobiusHorizons7 жыл бұрын
interesting as always. I eagerly await the responses.
@eformance7 жыл бұрын
6:25 Distance from workpiece also changes the focal area of the arc.
@SpeedyKU7 жыл бұрын
Two videos in two day Awesome, and your jokes are getting better.
@jester62919742 жыл бұрын
Thank you, Great explanation!
@fredericsangiorgi95072 жыл бұрын
Thanks, I’m glad you got that off your chest.
@jonathanlittle30125 жыл бұрын
Very interesting. I haven't done any tig welding with my powermts welder yet and have always wondered what that setting was all about.
@waitemc7 жыл бұрын
Bam!!!! Mind blow. NAILED IT TONY!!!!
@draftelite67707 жыл бұрын
I love these videos
@mountainviews50255 жыл бұрын
Tony this is a awesome video thanks guy your the man and off topic of this video your old welder I had one similar to it and was having the same issue with it and went through it driving myself crazy like you and a welder friend of mine that is a paid welder man they really make some good money sometimes it can be well over a hundred an hour anyway wow almost forgot what the heck all he did was put a high end grounds on it and Walla works perfectly I was happy happy joy joy that it worked but hmmmm I didn't like him for a minute cause it was that easy for him SO he double grounded it he tells me to put one at each end or ground my table and the part so I never heard of this before but I did it and surprisingly it does well so give it a try maybe it's a video love your channel keep teaching me stuff like to learn can't wait for your boy's projects I bet he's thinking already
@danielbernier91157 жыл бұрын
OMG. 2 days in a row?? I must be dreaming ! Haha
@zinckensteel7 жыл бұрын
Electrical Engineer here, with experience in RF, high voltage, and power transmission. Induction heaters for very large pieces of metal often are run down into the audio range, 1kHz or even less, to get sufficiently deep penetration of the work piece. There very well may be some merit to the skin effect theory, or at least should definitely not be ruled out on account of the low frequency. The shape of the electrode tip will strongly impact the electric field gradient, causing breakdown at lower voltage for sharper tips, and probably impacts the way current circulates within the plasma. What this means in practical terms, I have no idea. I'm not a welder :-)
@kurtrobbins20215 жыл бұрын
So... reading through the comments, my brain shit its pants! I guess i should have doped up on adderall while i was in school to stay focused. Instead, my pubescent mind would just wonder anywhere in from what my buddy ate for dinner based on the smell of expelled gasses from his mud vein, to what circus act I'll perform with my unpredictable yogurt slinger before the parents get home. I always thought welding much like i do... IT WAS PORK CHOPS!! Really though, great videos! Getting smart and giggling like a girl! Much appreciation to your knowledge, willingness to share, and knee slappers TOT! You help guys like me figure out a way to make it through a conundrum!
@MRTYREMULISHA7 жыл бұрын
Hmmmmmm Yeeeeeees...............i did not hear a word you said,after that cool looking CK water cooled torch and leather cover was on screen.But it was another awesome video with cool arc shots.
@shortribslongbow53127 жыл бұрын
Very interesting thanks for sharing.
@coldfinger459sub02 жыл бұрын
Great video I’m looking to purchase my first TIG welder DYI hobbyist of course looking at the cheaper Chinese under $1000 range
@ronmonahan16966 жыл бұрын
i was always under the understanding that higher frequency allows to run your tungsten sharper without it balling up thus creating a more precise and controlled arc. my welder does not have adjustable frequency, would like to try one. good video!
@dannynardelli1707 Жыл бұрын
Always enjoy your videos... I want to put my 2 cents in it's about your cup set up nothing wrong running a screen but in my time I really don't use them on aluminum. a stander diffuser #4 or #5 cup. there are time I have used a screen or larger cup but not often. In your test I would use the #4 it does have an effect on the etching zone. also you can run less gas 10 CFH. there are many variables in AC welding. wave form, AC balance, frequency and independent amperage. all play a roll ( causing complete Chaos ) ;-) Cheers
@whiskeythrottle93696 жыл бұрын
There was a comment made in the video that really resonated with me. "if 'I don´t know why, I`ll never remember it". I´ve been aware of that "feature" of my personality for many years, and it´s caused me a lot of headache in learning-environments. It seems at though learning in school never really is a matter of understanding.-It´s more a matter of remembering and being able to recite something for an exam, and then forget about it. But i like understanding. It´s the reason why i later in life learned so much about all things in life (like why AC frequency does what it does). I just wish teachers would recognize that some people really need a level of understanding instead of just remembering, and that the two might be causally linked.
@nateamus39207 жыл бұрын
Come for the shop tips and education and stay for the Dad Jokes. I heartily pressed the picture of the clenched fist with thumb extending upward, indicating my approval.
@scottmarshall67666 жыл бұрын
Think of it as a very fast stitch weld setup. If your MIG has stitch settings, you can duplicate the results. The longer the on time, the hotter the individual event. That happens because you are putting heat in faster than it is carried away. Because of this, longer on time results in higher local temperatures and larger puddle size. As the frequency goes up the shorter heating period no longer 'gets ahead' of the cooling period (as far, and eventually, not at all). Also the arc kernel is what generates the heat, not material resistance, so the surface shape and size effects heat flow (both in and out) My 2 cents. Thanks for all your videos, great insight - always learning, and having fun too.
@ThisIsAVeryBadIdea7 жыл бұрын
I do know that you're absolutely correct about the shape of the tip part. Electrical charge likes to collect to a point. Perhaps it's something like this: The higher the frequency, the less time each pulse has to travel through the material. So it doesn't heat it as deeply on a higher frequency.
@ROBRENZ7 жыл бұрын
Nice work Tony! ATB, Tony
@ThisOldTony7 жыл бұрын
Thanks Rob!
@jacobs23097 жыл бұрын
Great video! Under the same exact conditions, such a small change in frequency should have little effect on arc. When you start getting into orders of magnitude of frequency change then you will start to see a small difference but at that point you have a device that will not pass rf noise emission standards for certain communications bands. From an emag perspective, changing the sharpness of the tip will have a significant impact on arc width. In terms of power delivered at different frequencies, again, a change in frequency should have no effect. I and most of your commenters agree that your output wave will have more distortion at higher frequencies but there are probably other non-ideal components within your machine causing less power delivery. This is kind of difficult to measure because you would have to measure the power close to the tip. Just the tip, and only for a minute, mind. However, because the currents we are dealing with are relatively high, electromagnetic effects come into play and so the current "paths" through the material after the arc can be significantly different at higher frequencies.
@gustavocovarrubias17 жыл бұрын
"If I don't know why I'll never remember it" - that totally was my whole high school career in a nut shell
@tcimlaw60177 жыл бұрын
He's a witch! Or a practical genius. Best explanation I've ever heard.
@darrenlafreniere50342 жыл бұрын
Fantastic! Thank you!
@isellcatlitter7 жыл бұрын
i want to try tig welding... i am an old guy and have been welding smaw, gmaw, fcmaw, dual shielded fcmaw, old school oxy acetylene welding and brazing and even just plain old soldering with a torch or an iron for years, when you referenced Jody from welding tips and tricks.. had to subscribe... kudos dude.. btw Jody rocks and so does weld.com
@RG-3PO7 жыл бұрын
This video makes me want to fire up my welder and do some tests of my own. Inside corners are always the biggest problem areas when welding.
@weldingjunkie5 жыл бұрын
I did the same video on the HTP invertig 221 with the freq changing only before you did this and I had the same results as you. This is less of a gimmick then the wave forms at least. The wave forms don’t do anything at all it’s a scam. This was spot on with frequency great info.
@mxc517 жыл бұрын
Hi Tony, great video. It would have been interesting to show the plasma cone with a fixed set-up over the centre of the slots. This might show the effect of geometry on the cone shape compared to a flat surface. Best regards.
@Ifishmo7 жыл бұрын
Tony, I'll take a stab at this. I'm going to guess puddle width is driven by the amount of time the AC freq is in the negative or positive position. At 20 Hz, the 'wave' cycle time is 1/20 of a sec, or .05 sec. The neg or pos duration would be half of that, so .025 sec. Electron and Ion travel direction are driven by the polarity of the electrode. So when using 20 Hz, the Electron/Ions are being 'pushed' (or pulled if you prefer) for ~.025 seconds in one direction before the polarity changes and reverses the direction. For 200 Hz, the wave/cycle during is 1/200 of a sec (10 times shorter) thus the electrons/ions are pushed (pulled) away (towards) from the electrode 1/10th the amount of time as with 20 Hz. This decreased time is witnessed with your (TOT's) test as the Higher Freq (200 Hz) bead profile is obviously a lot narrower due to the shorter amount of time that electrons/ions can 'fan out' from the shortest/direct path to the work piece. I'd try to explain myself better here but i'm probably already too wordy so i'll leave it at that. Tony, thanks for all your efforts and great videos!
@Ifishmo7 жыл бұрын
Also, if you have the chance to look at a capacitive coupled (AC) plasma in a vacuum, in an environment with pressure around 5 Torr and 100% Argon gas (doesn't everyone have that opportunity? ;)-if the plasma is struck with 350 KHz, the plasma area will extend not only between cathode and anode, but it will radiate out in a circular fashion. The amount the plasma extends outward is extremely affected by the frequency used to strike/run/drive the plasma. If you use 13.56 MHz (~40X faster freq), the plasma 'ball' is very notably smaller in circumference, this phenomenon has been studied at length and is driven by the duration of polarity (as i was trying to explain above). Ok, off to mow the grass. Be well.
@repairtech93207 жыл бұрын
Before going wild with physics theory... I would use a clamp Amps meter and see if the current is really the same in each frequency. I would do the welds again with someone watching the meter telling me where I'm at when at full pedal. Then if the results are different I would do it again trying to match the current by controlling with the foot pedal. If I had a welder I would be testing this right now. Very interesting. Thank you for all the great work.
@feilb7 жыл бұрын
Skin depth is a completely reasonable explanation for heat penetration with thicker materials like your test sample. Skin depth in aluminum at 20Hz (sine wave) is about 18mm and at 200Hz is about 6mm. it should be noted that a square wave (or a squarish wave) has frequency components on every odd harmonic above the base frequency that account for maybe a 10th or so of the total power of the signal which would tend to flow shallower.
@leocurious99197 жыл бұрын
At that depth its still ~40% current. This does not explain the differences in these "thin" pieces. Also, the welding puddle is very shallow. In order for this to play a significant role the aluminium would have to be much worse at conducting heat and u would still have to heat the first cm to its melting point to see the effect. And maybe even then you would be unable to see it, as the current is not focused. As soon as its in the aluminium it spreads out (inverse square law). By the time its 1cm deep it will be spread out to ~6x the area (from a 1cm² arc), so resistive heating will already be minimal (in the order of the welding cable itself or less).
@queazocotal7 жыл бұрын
Leo Curious 40% current is 20% resistive heat.
@leocurious99197 жыл бұрын
That would be in 6mm depth at 200Hz. With the current density (current per area) already more than halfed due to the increase in area. The lower temperature will also reduce heating compared to the welding puddle. Also... we dont have a rod/wire with the current going threw its lenght, we manually inject the current at the side. So the skin effect will be even lower. I think the higher frequency doesnt alow the arc to wander around as much (less time to move around). And thus its a more narrow area.
@joeynovak074 жыл бұрын
Tony, I think your explanation is spot on. You probably know this by now, or someone else mentioned it in the comments below, but just in case, here is what I found... The skin depth at lower frequencies is negligible for small conductors at these frequencies, (20 to 200hz). But, for large conductors it is very relevant. See: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Skin_effect#Examples According to the graph there, the skin depth @ 200hz is 6mm, while @ 20hz it's 11mm. That's a big difference in the depth of current flow. The more resistive a material is, the larger the skin depth. As always, thanks for the videos!
@2010troyboy7 жыл бұрын
Proof is in the puddles! Great job!
@spinnoxx7 жыл бұрын
I never welded anything in my live and I didn't understand a thing. But nevertheless I watched the whole dam video just because it is sooooo fucking funny and well made. Props to you mate.
@52Ford7 жыл бұрын
Great video, as always. I've gotta knock off a couple points for you not doing your welds on the rotary table, though.
@andrecastro77307 жыл бұрын
Tony could you make a video explaining the first steps about how to use a metal lathe? Like a tutorial for young machinists?
@piccilos7 жыл бұрын
interesting video, thanks!
@VolksTrieb4 жыл бұрын
As a electrician (is that spelled right? Well iam ELEKTRIKER) higher frequency forced the current to run more towards the surface (because the changing current is inducing a magnetic field). Thou your right and thats what iam seeing as well. You get more heat INTO the area that you are welding. Maybe towards higher frequencies the current travels off of your weldpuddle into the surrounding... Just a theory here :) You can touch the arcs of powerfull teslacoils (with like more than a few mA output) and dont get killed because the current is just running over your skin (because of kHz to Mhz of frequency!) This video is older and maybe nobody reads this but HEY thanks for your very good videos, YOU LIVE MY DREAM. Id like to have that kind of equiptment ;)
@gatorwing62318 ай бұрын
My new 325 amp TIG machine will go up to 300HZ. I stay at 130HZ. I control the arc by shaping the electrode. Blunt for wide arc, sharp for narrow arc. If I increase the HZ it requires a higher amp setting. If I pulse, it needs the amps increased with increasing the pulses per second. Raising the frequency out of site is only for entertainment. I love that high whine 😛
@paulcopeland90357 жыл бұрын
"people have been welding with 60 hz since the beginning of time" !! Classic! This needs to be on the front page of a world history text. Excellent.
@kurtoconnor74567 жыл бұрын
I think it the difference in bead profile between the 20hz vs 200hz has to do with the oxide layer and the thermoconductivity of aluminum itself. It will also depend on the balance. But I think of it like this. The more switching from the hertz allows the oxide layer to retain a certain (dare I say surface tension) for lack of a better term. Which in turn reduces the bead profile and the wetting in the toes of the weld. The actual plasma cone shape really depends on how you dress your tungsten. Would love to see what 6061 thinks!!! Great video!!!
@fhaddad37 жыл бұрын
thanks for noticing.. I have been working out
@a.bakker646 жыл бұрын
With some divices you can also variate your zero line of the sinus. The minus cleans the material and the plus makes it burn into the material/puts in the heat. So if your material is dirty, or highly oxidated, you pull the sinus down, so that minus curve is longer and lower/deeper. With a low frequency you stretch out your sinus and with a high frequency you compress your sinus.
@CharisWilliams6 жыл бұрын
Brilliant welding :)
@snookdock7 жыл бұрын
thanks I have been working out.
@Fosgen4 жыл бұрын
You're really good welder. Kudos from amateur.
@qtip39986 жыл бұрын
Hi old Tony. I was wondering what kind of camera and lenses do you use. Your video quality is so clean.
@katatonos17 жыл бұрын
Your critique of other Tubers' weld comparisons was almost "fightin' words" until you called out Jody in particular for not being full of ish. He's the one who really pulled me into welding as a hobby.
@coddogg813 жыл бұрын
Idk but I would think of the freq like a pulse. The higher the frequency the less time spent on the penitration side of the cycle. So if I was pulsing in DC on say carbon. The higher the pulse the higher the amperage required to penitrate the same as no pulse. Thanks for the videos. Always good stuff.
@greatnortherntroll68417 жыл бұрын
I can't weld worth a Tinker's D*m#, and I don't own a TIG welder, but I still love your videos even when I can't relate to them! :)
@bvcxzgt54515 жыл бұрын
Interesting phrase, that. Fits right in with this channel. Think of the dam as the mold against which you cast tin for a repair to a tin pot. You dam it up with whatever you have handy, and the dam itself is worthless junk. : A tinker's dam is a temporary patch to repair a hole in a metal vessel such as a pot or a pan. It was used by tinkers and was usually made of mud or clay, or sometimes other materials at hand, such as wet paper. The material was built up around the outside of the hole, so as to plug it. Molten solder was then poured on the inside of the hole. The solder cooled and solidified against the dam and bonded with the metal wall. The dam was then brushed away. The remaining solder was then rasped and smoothed down by the tinker.[6][7] In the Practical Dictionary of Mechanics of 1877, Edward Knight gives this definition: "Tinker's-dam: a wall of dough raised around a place which a plumber desires to flood with a coat of solder. The material can be but once used; being consequently thrown away as worthless"
@Regalmetalworks7 жыл бұрын
I found similar results. The higher frequency tends to have a tighter and taller bead. The lower frequency flattens out and penetrates more at the same amperage. Guess I will try and up the amps when running higher frequencies.
@kkendall997 жыл бұрын
Another thing to take into consideration, your welder vs another in maintaining a perfect sign wave at high current vs low current may differ from another welder. Not saying your wrong but it would be kind of useful to see the wave form. If you could do that then I think the debate would be settled. In any case thanks for another fantastic video.