5 Things You Never Knew About the Focke-Wulf 190

  Рет қаралды 760,311

TJ3 History

TJ3 History

Күн бұрын

This is another addition to my countdowns series, featuring the Focke-Wulf 190 (Fw-190). This was made using the World War II flight simulator IL-2 Sturmovik Great Battles series and War Thunder. Hope you enjoy! Please like, comment, and subscribe. #WW2 #WWIIHistory #WarThunder
Want to fly with me in one of these great WWII flight sims? Download War Thunder for free here! playwt.link/TJ3History
Support TJ3 History by signing up for my awesome monthly history package, Letters From War! Join here! bit.ly/3OvrF91
Have an idea for one of my videos? Submit it here! forms.gle/91xwbGKQsRCNZmwm9
If you want to support TJ3 History and get access to special VIP content, please check out these awesome links!
Patreon - / tj3history
TJ3 History Merch Store!
teespring.com/stores/tj3-gami...
Follow me on social media for updates!
Discord - / discord
Twitter - Twitter.com/TJ3History
Twitch - Twitch.com/TJ3Gaming
Instagram - TJ3History

Пікірлер: 843
@michaelbatson1879
@michaelbatson1879 Жыл бұрын
From what I have read, Georg-Peter Eder was credited with 78 kills, 68 on the Western front. I also read that 36 of those kills were 4 engine bombers. He also flew the Me 262 and was credited with 12 kills in that aircraft. He was awarded the Knights Cross with Oakleaves. He survived the war and died in March 1986.
@absolutechad9735
@absolutechad9735 Жыл бұрын
Absolute hero
@patrickmccrann991
@patrickmccrann991 Жыл бұрын
4 engine bomber kills under the Luftwaffe system did not mean they were shutdown. There were several degrees to a bomber kill under their system. Many Allied officers scoffed at the "kill" numbers credited to German pilots during the war, but learned later that Germany had even a harder system for credits than the Allies.
@dub2536
@dub2536 Жыл бұрын
RIP!
@roblouw3038
@roblouw3038 Жыл бұрын
Wow - that is very impressive - attacking frontally greatly minimized the fire that bombers could bring to bear on approaching fighter bomber interceptors especially when it flew past and above its very difficult to hit a moving target flashing overhead at more than 500km/h not including the forward speed of the bomber then moving away at it's top speed - yes, the bf109 was too lightly armoured to attack those long range Allied bombers - Galland was speechless when the Me262 was introduced that Hitler decided that only every 12th Me262 produced would be used for intercepting long range Bombers as the Me262 was so good at destroying bombers that if all the Me262 production had been used in the role it was actually designed for Galland reckoned that the Luftwaffe could have deployed more than 200 Me262's per day, flying say 3 sorties each per day, which is 600 Me262's up in the air every day against the bombing raids the Bomber raids would have ended very soon after such deployment...strange but true...
@madcat4633
@madcat4633 Жыл бұрын
@@patrickmccrann991 And that is not entirely true. There was just one degree: shot down. Luftwaffe didn't have "shared kills" or strafing runs counting as kills. What they did have tho, was a differentiation between "kills" (the numbers you can look up) and "kill points". Those "kill points" were there to make some kind of scoring board for getting a medal. You got points for damaging a bomber so it fell out of formation and points for the killing blow. But those points were only for adwarding medals. Not for the tally on the tailplane. Someone credited with 36 kills had infact downed 36 bombers (at least the Luftwaffe thought so. Overclaiming and Over-crediting was a thing for all air forces during the war. // And the Germans knew it, too)
@SecNotSureSir
@SecNotSureSir Жыл бұрын
What struck me about the FW-190, is the video of a British Spitfire pilot that test flew the first captured FW-190 and his remarks about it: “where the spitfire purred, the Focke-wulf snarled”.
@johnholt890
@johnholt890 Жыл бұрын
Spitfire IX still trumped it pretty quickly though.
@sandordula5207
@sandordula5207 Жыл бұрын
@@johnholt890 - There is a long debate way back about it. A fav topic in the documentaries.
@user-zx6dw3vk4i
@user-zx6dw3vk4i 10 ай бұрын
Mamiek Prakoso
@richardcaves3601
@richardcaves3601 8 ай бұрын
​@@user-fx6cr3ze4k262 was a piece of crap. Poor metallurgy, crap engines that lasted 10 hours c/f meteors and vampires that lasted 1000 hours. Meteors and vampires were two weeks out from mass production in May 45, and Winkler Brown tested both then flew 262. German aircraft was way inferior. P51s and P47s shot them down. Even Galland said meteor was better.
@britcitjudge3886
@britcitjudge3886 7 ай бұрын
​@@user-fx6cr3ze4kbut they lost the war twice
@12pagani
@12pagani Жыл бұрын
I still think this plane has one of the baddest nicknames in the war, the butcher bird. The name just suits it so damn well. Truly a great design and an iconic warbird
@adamrodgers2377
@adamrodgers2377 Жыл бұрын
Yup it had a cool nickname for sure, I would put the F-4U CoursAir in a tie though with Whistling Death. 🤙🏼
@nickmitsialis
@nickmitsialis 11 ай бұрын
That's just the German nickname for a bird called a 'Shrike'. An interesting little critter that fed on insects, other birds, small rodents and reptiles. It had a 'charming' habit of impaling future meals on thorns and tree branches. The 'hanging meat' image is where the 'butcher bird' nickname was derived from. Of course, the FW was still a lethal bird of prey in a small, compact package, so THAT fits, too.
@user-zx6dw3vk4i
@user-zx6dw3vk4i 10 ай бұрын
Mamiek Prakoso
@mareksoucek4514
@mareksoucek4514 3 ай бұрын
​@@nickmitsialis funfact. In German and English, the name of the bird sounds badass, but in my language (czech) it's sound super adorable: Ťuhýk "tyuheek" 😂😂 imagine getting killed and in heaven/hell it would be like: Hey, Hans, how did you die? I got killed by this beast named after strong and fast horse Mustang. What about you Adolf? I got killed by the machine that was on fire even when taxing called Spitfire. And you Josef? I don't wanna say...
@nickmitsialis
@nickmitsialis 3 ай бұрын
@@mareksoucek4514 In Valhalla it doesn't matter; your old enemies are now your comrades too! Just like in 'Reap The Wild WInd' by Ultravox: kzfaq.info/get/bejne/icuCbLKlrrXFmpc.html
@nicholasconder4703
@nicholasconder4703 Жыл бұрын
One rather interesting story from WW2. In an American 8th Air Force mess hall in England a poster had been put up showing a waist gunner aiming his machinegun towards the viewer with the caption "Whose afraid of the big bad Wulf?". In large letters beneath the poster someone wrote, "WE ARE!"
@tanamly
@tanamly Жыл бұрын
Such stupid posters ! The soldier who wrote it showed his humanity, which should have never been undermined in the first place especially since if the Germans had been reasonable and not headed by a scumbag, militarily they would have actually won and forced landslide victories. No one knew this first hand better than the poor souls who were sent out to face those facts, and that ought to have been respected.
@drstrangelove4998
@drstrangelove4998 Жыл бұрын
🤣
@Raz.C
@Raz.C Жыл бұрын
As I understand WWII fighter issues (and I don't have a particularly good grasp on any of them), bombers weren't particularly worrisome to fighter aircraft. A fighter didn't have to worry overmuch about the gunners in an enemy bomber shooting them down, unless they tried to fly in formation with those bombers. Fighter escorts were a MUCH bigger problem than the turreted guns of a bomber. Turrets were good at discouraging fighters (ie- discouraging them from flying straight behind a bomber and shooting until it went down), but not very good at stopping them. Hells, even after the americans joined the war in Europe, the Luftwaffe was still shredding allied air forces until the MASSIVE weight of numbers overwhelmed the Germans and caused the Luftwaffe to cease to be a threat. SO, the caption "Who's afraid of the big bad Wulf?" is a lot of bluster, whereas the retort "WE ARE!" is realistic and believable.
@nicholasconder4703
@nicholasconder4703 Жыл бұрын
@@Raz.C You have to remember that the poster in question would have been a propaganda poster, so it would obviously be made in the hopes of boosting morale. Equally obvious is that it didn't work.
@MWcrazyhorse
@MWcrazyhorse Жыл бұрын
The Wolf was the nickname for Hitler. So that's a bit of a self own there.
@tomwoggle9411
@tomwoggle9411 Жыл бұрын
Kurt Tank was in fact anything but set on using a radial engine for the Fw-190. The one and only reason why the Fw-190 has a radial engine is that the DB 601 (and then the DB-605) engine used in the Bf-109 wasn't available in sufficient numbers. The only German engine powerful enough and available in large enough quantities suitable for a second mass produced fighter was the radial BMW-801 engine used in bombers. Kurt Tank simply had make do with what was available, and he came up with a pretty brilliant little fighter.
@sigeberhtmercia767
@sigeberhtmercia767 Жыл бұрын
Can't help but note the comparison with the Hawker line of fighters which had to find alternatives to the Merlin/Griffin engines.
@Wolf-hh4rv
@Wolf-hh4rv Жыл бұрын
Bang on . He didn’t chose a radial. There are so many faults with the narrative.
@user-zx6dw3vk4i
@user-zx6dw3vk4i 10 ай бұрын
Mamiek Prakoso
@antoniomanuelrodrigues-sz7lb
@antoniomanuelrodrigues-sz7lb 9 ай бұрын
​@@sigeberhtmercia767 Griffon engine. !!
@professortill8592
@professortill8592 8 ай бұрын
This is my understanding too.
@chuck.reichert83
@chuck.reichert83 Жыл бұрын
The landing gear of the BF-109 was intentionally designed that way to allow for easier field repair, as you could easily replace wings in the field, not to mention tow them behind trucks. Yes the narrow undercarriage took skill to land, but the design was brilliant if you look at what it's role was.
@crown7639
@crown7639 Жыл бұрын
Yeah it’s all about give and take. Pretty much any design choice on any vehicle is done for a reason. Even the widely criticized ones.
@SoloRenegade
@SoloRenegade Жыл бұрын
the FW190 was far easier to field repair
@paulkerr782
@paulkerr782 Жыл бұрын
I read somewhere that around 50% of all Bf- 109 hull losses were due to landing accidents relating to the narrow gear
@chuck.reichert83
@chuck.reichert83 Жыл бұрын
@@paulkerr782 those numbers were elevated by inexperienced pilots. The BF-109 was designed to be a home defense, short range fighter. Losses during the Battle of Britain diminished experienced pilots at an unrecoverable rate. The aircraft did not have loitering capability, durability, or range. Good when you can retrieve your pilot, bad when your pilot goes on a one way mission. Equipment is replaceable. Experience is not.
@chuck.reichert83
@chuck.reichert83 Жыл бұрын
@@SoloRenegade in what ways? Hits to the fuselage requires major overhaul no matter the airframe. Wing surface area is usually the largest target on an aircraft. Wings can be replaced easily on a BF-109, but not on a FW-190. The radial of A variants of the FW-190 was more durable than the liquid cooled V of the Dora's. Logistics to support the BF-109 variants was easier as well.
@PassportToPimlico
@PassportToPimlico Жыл бұрын
An interesting fact about both the 190 and 109 was that they had a hatch so that a member of ground crew could be carried when the squadron had to move locations. The downside of this was that if the aircraft got into any trouble, the pilot could bail out but his passenger could not.
@jesusizquierdo3831
@jesusizquierdo3831 Жыл бұрын
what? where was this hatch?
@PassportToPimlico
@PassportToPimlico Жыл бұрын
@@jesusizquierdo3831 It was the radio access hatch and seems to be an emergency procedure. One German pilot, looking to surrender to the Western Allies took his engineer with him but shot down a Russian bomber on the way.
@tsubadaikhan6332
@tsubadaikhan6332 Жыл бұрын
Fun Fact about Fokker Wulf - Australia ended up with a large Airforce during WW2 to fight the Japanese. Our Chief Aeronautical Engineer was Fred David. Guys that worked with him said he was a Genius that could both design or repair anything. Without him turning around repairs on our P40's and sending them back to Papua New Guinea, we probably would have lost it, extending the War a couple of years. Only Fred David was born Fredrich Davide, a German Jew who worked for Fokker Wulf before escaping to Australia in the 30's. So Fokker Wulf kind of set the Japanese back too... He actually designed a plane in Australia that looked a hell of a lot like the 190.
@Leon_der_Luftige
@Leon_der_Luftige Жыл бұрын
It's Focke, not Fokker.
@trolleysparks3941
@trolleysparks3941 Жыл бұрын
Love the ‘stories’. That one is worth a slow sip on a good beer, just super. Many thanks.
@Caktusdud.
@Caktusdud. Жыл бұрын
Interesting
@smokeonthewater5287
@smokeonthewater5287 Жыл бұрын
@@Leon_der_Luftige Yes Fokker is a totally different Dutch manufacturer.
@SVW1976
@SVW1976 Жыл бұрын
I met the Fockers once.
@flammenwerfer6548
@flammenwerfer6548 Жыл бұрын
My favorite Luftwaffe aircraft due its beautiful design and perfect roll rate I love flying this plane in war thunder
@jackd1582
@jackd1582 Жыл бұрын
Roll rate 💫💫💫💫💯
@albertaaardvark966
@albertaaardvark966 Жыл бұрын
I was lucky enough to see the recovered FW190 fly when I visited the museum in Everitt Washington a few years back. Not many of these left a d to see it fly was a real treat.
@adamrodgers2377
@adamrodgers2377 Жыл бұрын
Man that had to be cool!!! I have been lucky enough to see a BF-109 up close and then fly. I have had the opportunity to see a Spitfire, P-40, P-47, Mustang, F-4U CoursAir, Wildcat, Hellcat, and I'm embarrassed that I forget the name of this but it was the U.S Navys Dive Bomber and the BF-109. I would LOVE to see a Butcher Bird one day. I wish they had brought back more of these and they all wont chopped up for scrap because of the History of them, not the crap most of the "Woke" Sheep will blather on about because the Aircraft can't help what "Side" it was on or what symbol is painted on it. I would love for my Daughter to see one as well. She loves going to the Airshows around home 😀
@frosty3693
@frosty3693 Жыл бұрын
The engine choice was in a big part a desire to not use the DB600 series engines as they were needed in other planes. Kurt Tank was originally an electrical engineer so he knew using electric controls where ever possible would save weight and make repairs easier. The radial engine also permited the whole power unit, engine, exhaust, supercharger and carburetor all one unit, called the power egg, that could quickly be replaced in the field. (that is why you see some pictures of FW190s with different color cowlings than the rest of the plane. Another innovation is they made an analog (without the digtal part) FADEC (full authority digital engine control) engine control system to make operating the engine much easier. Normally there is a air intake control, fuel mixture, turbo control, prop speed control and cowl flap control that all are managed separately and often at the same time. A FADEC system, just one lever.
@Rickinsf
@Rickinsf Жыл бұрын
The engine on the FW190 could be swapped out within an hour, or so I"m told.
@andreasarnoalthofsobottka2928
@andreasarnoalthofsobottka2928 Жыл бұрын
There were one handle engine controls for all german aero engines (Bramo, Jumo, DB, BMW) available.
@jeremypnet
@jeremypnet Жыл бұрын
There were power eggs for inline engines too. Rolls Royce had one for the Merlin and Griffon.
@AcceptYourDeath
@AcceptYourDeath Жыл бұрын
Yeah I think it is somewhat wrongly presented here. It was less a stroke of genius but rather the only engine he would get for later production. All inline engines we're reserved already.
@bertblue9683
@bertblue9683 Жыл бұрын
Even in '43 I'm definitely sure Peter Eater regretted his name. Outstanding presentation. You deserve millions of subscribers. Earned mine
@TJ3
@TJ3 Жыл бұрын
Thank you!
@raulcarmello1163
@raulcarmello1163 Жыл бұрын
🤣🤣🤣
@Folgeantrag
@Folgeantrag Жыл бұрын
The name can be only funny in english translation. I am very sure his name was Peter Esser. Esser is a traditional medieval german name for a family of wagon builders. Translating personal names can be misgiving
@paoloviti6156
@paoloviti6156 Жыл бұрын
@@FolgeantragThe actual name was Georg-Peter "Schorsch" Eder (8 March 1921 - 11 March). He is credited with 78 aerial victories achieved in 572 combat missions, including 150 combat missions with the Messerschmitt Me 262 jet fighter. This figure includes 10 aerial victories on the Eastern Front, and further 68 victories over the Western Allies, including 36 four-engined bombers. Quite a pilot!
@mattalley7646
@mattalley7646 Жыл бұрын
Agreed and subscribed!
@christineshotton824
@christineshotton824 Жыл бұрын
In many ways the FW-190 was WWII's F-16. A multi-role tactical fighter.
@mrcat5508
@mrcat5508 Ай бұрын
Yeah no.
@nilanjangupta763
@nilanjangupta763 2 күн бұрын
That would be the P-47 Thunderbolt.
@mrcat5508
@mrcat5508 2 күн бұрын
@@nilanjangupta763 indeed
@mrcat5508
@mrcat5508 2 күн бұрын
@@nilanjangupta763 well except it was expensive by fighter standards for the time, while the f 16 is relatively cheap
@christineshotton824
@christineshotton824 2 күн бұрын
@@nilanjangupta763 P-47 was much more like an F-15E.
@kirkmooneyham
@kirkmooneyham Жыл бұрын
Very good video, but something of great interest was missed. The engine control of the FW-190 was ahead of its time. Unlike most aircraft of the era, which had multiple levers for mixture, throttle, etc, the radial on the -190 had all of it tied together into one lever for the pilot to worry about. Took time for the ground crews to get it adjusted correctly after an engine change, but it certainly simplified things for the pilot in combat.
@Tacticaviator7
@Tacticaviator7 Жыл бұрын
Well it was probably ignored since many German planes of that time used those mechanical computers for engine control.
@Suo_kongque
@Suo_kongque Жыл бұрын
@@Tacticaviator7 this one was the most advanced of them.
@Suo_kongque
@Suo_kongque Жыл бұрын
@@Tacticaviator7 I’m being serious. The Kommandoräte was extremely advanced, even when compared to the mechanical computers of the Daimler Benz engines
@Beemer917
@Beemer917 Жыл бұрын
My Father was a teenaged apprentice at a metal treatment and grinding shop in Denmark during the war. The shop was forced to do the hardening and grinding work on camshafts for for V12 aircraft engines for the german Reich. They did several parts and then Germans who had their own inspection teams and even a heavy to make sure their orders were followed. My father found out, after a while that the Danes had put water into the oil bath that hardened the camshafts. The water would lay in the bottom of the oil bath and make the last bering journal on the cam shaft glass hard instead of tough hard. The Germans tested the hardness between the journals and lobes so as not to leave a hardness testing mark on a bering surface.After the war it was found out that this shop had accounted for many German fighter planes lost because of engine failure. The failure would happen when the engine was put under high stress. The engine would actually function quite well and run normally until it was heavily loaded then the final journal on the camshaft would fail. This sabotage was never discovered during the war.
@ardshielcomplex8917
@ardshielcomplex8917 Жыл бұрын
Water floats on top of Oil unless the Oil is water soluble.
@wrathofatlantis2316
@wrathofatlantis2316 8 ай бұрын
​​​@@ardshielcomplex8917That immediately struck me as odd too... Another thing is the breakdowns NOT being traced to a specific shop DURING the War, but AFTER the War: The Luftwaffe alone burned thousands of tons of documents at the end, so tracing failures outcomes AFTER is far less likely, especially if that was not accomplished DURING... Some of these sabotage stories are undoubtedly true, but keep in mind a lot of people started to tote guns and parade around like they were tough partisans, immediately AFTER the Germans had left... I was told all of France was literally awash in murderous partisans in the days following the Germans departure. As many as 100 000 French people are said to have been their victims in one way or another, this in the span of a few months. Post-facto heroism is a common WWII staple.
@SCS10000
@SCS10000 7 ай бұрын
ja ja Christian .. og sukker i beton'en til Karup, Vandel og Skrydstrup startbaner ... og vand i mælken til tyskerne .. og .. og .. og .. Det er ammestuehistorier hele bundet. Noget helt andet er Skavenius medløberi med Tyskerne mht. Frikorps Danmark, HIPO korpset .. og .. og .. og, Og hele banden på Christiansborg slap unden så meget som en reprimande, mens tusinder af unge danske mænd blev berøvet alle rettigheder .. mange post mortem af de samme som blot år forinden havde opfordret dem til at deltage på tysk side .. den lille lde Axel Larsen som den værste!!
@bobsakamanos4469
@bobsakamanos4469 19 күн бұрын
Makes sense. Most oils, including mineral oil, is less dense than water. Synthetic oil even less dense. I'd like to know what oil would not float on water in WWII germany.
@olskool3967
@olskool3967 Жыл бұрын
WW2 German tec. fascinates me! it is amazing how smart and resourceful these people were.
@iansmith5174
@iansmith5174 Жыл бұрын
One export customer for the Focke-Wulf Fw 190 was Turkey; a neutral nation during WWII. This meant that Fw 190s of the Turkish Air Force served alongside planes that would have otherwise been their wartime enemies; including Spitfires, Hurricanes, and P-40 Warhawks.
7 ай бұрын
Yeah the Turkish Air Force During WW2 was like the British Museum of Air Forces ahahahah
@Macmax7077
@Macmax7077 Жыл бұрын
the FW-190 is the most beautiful plane ever!
@billsanders5067
@billsanders5067 Жыл бұрын
I beg to differ, the American F4U Corsair was the most beautiful plane ever.
@oceanhome2023
@oceanhome2023 Жыл бұрын
The FW-190 had SO many changes it had both a Radial and a water cooled engine that changed its shape . I like the Radial powered ones but the ones at the very end looked great
@fredericklee4821
@fredericklee4821 Жыл бұрын
P-51D
@gibusgaming5866
@gibusgaming5866 Жыл бұрын
Ngl I still prefer the sleek look of the bf-109s, but if I am being honest the me-262 is peak.
@chuck-echeese6706
@chuck-echeese6706 Жыл бұрын
@@gibusgaming5866 the f8f bearcat would like to know your location.
@zenonelealainen3750
@zenonelealainen3750 Жыл бұрын
The Fw 190 actually came into combat use in august 1941, not in late 1942.
@janrobertbos
@janrobertbos Жыл бұрын
Kurt Tank was a truly brilliant designer.....................
@SwordFighterPKN
@SwordFighterPKN Жыл бұрын
I've always loved the lines of this plane!
@bkucinschi
@bkucinschi Жыл бұрын
P47 Thunderbolt was equally rugged due to its air-cooled engine.
@MrDeadstu
@MrDeadstu Жыл бұрын
The "Butcher Bird" was a hell of a plane, the D-9 especially.
@Ryan57Garr
@Ryan57Garr 11 ай бұрын
It had enough space for a passenger. Photographers would occasionally ride inside the fuselage of a Fw 190 by climbing in through the radio access hatch and then take air-to-air photographs from it. The feature was also used to transport crew and civilians right after the Normandy invasion.
@ranulf8477
@ranulf8477 Жыл бұрын
When the british pilots first saw the Focke Wulf, they thought that its some kind of american plane captured by the germans when they defeated france. It was so powerfull against their Spitfires and they had no idea that germany had invented and build it.
@meusana3681
@meusana3681 Жыл бұрын
another fun fact about the 109. The 20mm cannon actually sat waaay back in the cabin between the pilot's legs. I can't imagine the sound inside the cabin when that thing fired.
@smokeonthewater5287
@smokeonthewater5287 Жыл бұрын
Guns make noise mostly from the muzzle, not from the lock.
@roachallthetime
@roachallthetime Жыл бұрын
The gun was covered by a metal bulkhead as well so I doubt it was noisy at all especially with the engine running.
@meusana3681
@meusana3681 Жыл бұрын
@@roachallthetime Interesting. I guess having an exposed breach would also be a bit of a safety hazard.
@bkucinschi
@bkucinschi Жыл бұрын
Kurt Tank, the designer of FW190 while in the employment of Mustachio Adolf, went after the war to design jet powered fighters for Macho Peron in Argentina.
@jimc6687
@jimc6687 Жыл бұрын
Specifically, the Curtis Seahawk, TJ but really any reconnaissance aircraft of WW II that saw a ton of action! These planes were absolutely the unsung heroes of the war and I feel none more so than their great service covering the vastness of the Pacific Ocean! Jim C.
@andraslibal
@andraslibal Жыл бұрын
I remember seeing the FW 190 in the Royal Airforce Museum. They were the David vs the Goliaths of the Allies.
@kenneth9874
@kenneth9874 Жыл бұрын
It started out with the positions reversed
@andraslibal
@andraslibal Жыл бұрын
@@kenneth9874 it was never reversed the Germans were always the underdogs vs the British and French Empire. Not to mention the Soviets or the US. It is just the underdog story that the Allies like to tell but Germans always fought with less ... they just were better. For a while. Until numbers won.
@kenneth9874
@kenneth9874 Жыл бұрын
@@andraslibal keep telling yourself that
@jonathanhansen3709
@jonathanhansen3709 Жыл бұрын
I heard a former B-17 pilot, who had flown out of Britain, during the war, say, in the chow hall of his squadron, someone had written near the exit, “Who’s Afraid of the Bad Focke Wulf?”, in parody to a popular song at the time. He said every pilot in the group scribble their name below it!
@crazymoose9875
@crazymoose9875 Жыл бұрын
FW 190, "the butcher bits" looks like a muscle, bad ass warbird, great vid TJ, Thanks from Lima-Perú!!!
@rubiksmanbv7934
@rubiksmanbv7934 Жыл бұрын
Why is this man so damn underrated, you deserve MILLIONS of subscribers for all the effort that you put into these ❤!!
@TJ3
@TJ3 Жыл бұрын
Thank you :)
@m.r.3912
@m.r.3912 Жыл бұрын
Some more efforts to get the pronunciation of german words right would be wellcome
@coolsurfer1785
@coolsurfer1785 Жыл бұрын
T3 thank you historian
@alitlweird
@alitlweird Жыл бұрын
Because this subject is very esoteric to most people.
@jamesmooney5348
@jamesmooney5348 Жыл бұрын
Nazi's don't need highlighting. They were a murderous evil army/people who fought for rewards they now receive in hell where they belong. This guy speaks too highly of them!
@zenonelealainen3750
@zenonelealainen3750 Жыл бұрын
I think it's actually strange that the 190 is never, not even in this video, mentioned as being by far the best fighter in the world from august 1941 to june 1942. No other fighter during the war was that much better than any other fighters than the 190 was during that period. People though do seem to remember always how the P-51B was by far the best fighter from august 1943 to june 1944. When compare the 190 and the P-51, they were two completely different planes. The 190 was an excellent front line fighter, that excelled in harsh conditions while the P-51 excelled in that escort role when it operated from those well equipped big airfields.
@Minong_Manitou_Mishepeshu
@Minong_Manitou_Mishepeshu Жыл бұрын
Kurt Tank's designs rule!
@Nativeat1YT
@Nativeat1YT Жыл бұрын
Gotta be the last aircraft allied bomber crews wanted to see in early 1944. Great Video as usual from TJ!
@TJ3
@TJ3 Жыл бұрын
Thanks Native!
@patttrick
@patttrick Жыл бұрын
I thought that the FW was designed for medium altitude .Bombers fly high I would have thought that the109 would have been better
@fredericklee4821
@fredericklee4821 Жыл бұрын
Soooooooooooo why are the CGI graphics shown without the swatstika on the tail?
@Nativeat1YT
@Nativeat1YT Жыл бұрын
@@fredericklee4821 it's not CGI its a video game.
@mrcat5508
@mrcat5508 Ай бұрын
@@Nativeat1YTit’s waaarthunderrrrrrrr
@mariosperling6295
@mariosperling6295 Жыл бұрын
The landing gear configuration of the Bf 109 was a requirement of the Reich Aviation Ministry during the tender to allow the aircraft to be transported by road. The decision to use a radial engine in the FW 190 came from Ernst Udet. Since the production capacity for the DB601 was exhausted, an engine had to be used which still had sufficient production capacity. This was the BMW 139.
@wrathofatlantis2316
@wrathofatlantis2316 Жыл бұрын
The Fw-190A was an excellent low-speed turn fighter (at low speeds it decisively out-turned the Spitfire, Pierre Clostermann calling the idea that the Spitfire out-turned either German fighters at lower speeds of 200 knots "A good joke"), and the 190 could also go fast, but then could only go straight... The Spitfire maneuvered well at high speeds, and could make fast, broad circles, but they had to be broader, faster circles than the Me-109 or the FW-190A, so it had to stall itself to point nose-up at the smaller German circles, which was inefficient... The Spitfire was best used as a hit and run vertical fighter, because of its tremendous climb rate, while the FW-190A was best used as a slow going turn fighter (which was actually better than using speed, as the target was "locked" in the turn for a long time [rolling out of a turn was instant death for all types] and this stability was good for the typical 1% hit rate), while the Me-109G could do both hit and run or slow turns... The Me-109 was less tough but also less prone to catch fire than the FW-190, because it carried less fuel. The P-51 was a bit like the Spitfire, but it could downthrottle to turn better at low speeds, which the Spitfire could not, because the Spitfire had no partial flap angle. Using 10-20 degrees of flaps in turns was the whole secret of using the P-51 successfully in battle. The Allies understood (informally at front line unit level) the need to turn fight (to compensate the gun hit rate weakness), and they did so much sooner than the Germans or the Japanese Navy, who remained stuck on hit and run too long. For more on these new findings, see my channel here for a few hints on why all this is so poorly understood: kzfaq.info/get/bejne/q7-edqxkvbu2qGQ.html kzfaq.info/get/bejne/odyYl8pq2ta3pGQ.html
@mikebrownhill8955
@mikebrownhill8955 Жыл бұрын
It makes you wonder how good this aircraft could have been had the luftwaffe had access to 150 octane fuel. That together with water-methanol injection would have been formidable. Particularly on the Dora with the Jumo 213.
@MDzmitry
@MDzmitry Жыл бұрын
I think had they had at least proper 100-octane fuel, they wouldn't have gone for MW-50 as much, since it increased the wear on engines. With proper fuel the Germans wouldn't be in such a hurry to catch up in the horse power race.
@gusthesailor4885
@gusthesailor4885 Жыл бұрын
I was lucky years ago to be able to sit in the cockpit of a Spitfire.. a Bf 109 and a Focke-Wulf 190A4 (located in a private museum in Hannover-Laatzen Germany) Compared to the cockpit of the 109 and Spit that of FW is very modern for its time and offers little difference with those of the jets of the 50s and the layout is very comfortable for the pilot compared to the other two
@reidveryan9414
@reidveryan9414 Жыл бұрын
It was also designed to be able take on more weight as development progressed, something that the 109 was not the best at.
@bobsakamanos4469
@bobsakamanos4469 19 күн бұрын
The A-3 with a wing loading of 43+ lb/sq ft didn't have a lot of room for growth without compromising some performance like turn radius, climb etc
@Minong_Manitou_Mishepeshu
@Minong_Manitou_Mishepeshu Жыл бұрын
I have a vid presentation suggestion, if you haven't made it already, the P-40 N. Not any P-40, but the P-40 N model. ...They made a mock up P-40C, with twin engines in 1942 that was overlooked, then history forgot. Worth a look at. Imagine that with modern turbo props and counter rotating paddle props.
@billsanders5067
@billsanders5067 Жыл бұрын
I read an article in an aviation magazine some years ago. After the war, several Fw 190's were shipped to the U.S. The navy got their hands on several and had gun cameras installed. They were flown in simulated combat mauvers against the F6 Hellcat, the Corsair F4 and the F8 Bearcat. In the hands of equally experienced pilots, it came out even. Against the F8, the Fw 190 got smoked every time.
@Vtwin60
@Vtwin60 11 ай бұрын
Amazing when comparing a plane that debuted in 1941 vs an end of war 1945 model isn't it? Fwiw the version compared to F4u1 and Hellcat was a rebuilt A8. Fw190 a3 and a5 were lighter and more agile air to air.
@sigeberhtmercia767
@sigeberhtmercia767 Жыл бұрын
The strategy of head on attacks on the bombers was to be abandoned when flying the Me262 because the closing speed was too high.
@ForestRaptor
@ForestRaptor Жыл бұрын
Yup... aiming that single line of fire during the ms of time would be akin to luke hitting the exhaust port in Star Wars.
@pat36a
@pat36a Жыл бұрын
It's sad that the Museum in Washing state is having issues, seems they fell off the map since It's owner and founder passed. They were in the process of restoring the only flying Stuka, had all the major Airframe done, and were starting final assembly .
@nikkiann-marie2634
@nikkiann-marie2634 Жыл бұрын
It’s always interesting to look at how seemingly huge the 190a’s looked to the 190d’s(at least to me they do in dcs and war thunder representations). Like if you look at the a-8 vs the d-9. Yet they served the same purpose really.
@hashteraksgage3281
@hashteraksgage3281 Жыл бұрын
The dora was optimized for higher altitudes and had better preformance and aerodynamics, while the Anton carried more weapons and was better for lower altitudes
@sirbader1
@sirbader1 Жыл бұрын
The 190A is noticeably smaller than a 190D. The D isn't as wide, but thats offset by the increased length.
@hoppie8693
@hoppie8693 Жыл бұрын
@@sirbader1 Fuselage width of A and D is basically identical disregarding the supercharge bulges on A and charger intake on D. If included, D is wider. Since they utilize the same fuselage and wing in regards to dimensions, the widest point is at the front of the wing root, identical on both. The only real difference in dimension is fuselage length through longer engine cowling, fuselage plug and slight extension of vertical stabilizer in front of the rudder.
@sirbader1
@sirbader1 Жыл бұрын
@@hoppie8693 True, but the intake is only noticeable from certain angles, giving it a narrowed appearance a large percentage of the time.
@hoppie8693
@hoppie8693 Жыл бұрын
@@sirbader1 Sure, it might look narrower than A. Just saying that it actually isn't.
@derlindwurm
@derlindwurm Жыл бұрын
One thing I definitely do know about the Fw-190 thanks to various flight simulators is that you can barely see out the front of it.
@ForestRaptor
@ForestRaptor Жыл бұрын
THIS! I love this raptor to a fault! But it is horrible to spot things easy. Those night hunters are different breed of fighters
@44madison
@44madison Жыл бұрын
Wonderful video! As an aviation enthusiast, I am always up for learning about planes and building my knowledge on WWII aircraft. Can you please cover the Fairchild PT-19 next? I'd enjoy seeing a video on the Ryan PT-22 and also the Stearman biplanes.
@mariannepompa4152
@mariannepompa4152 Жыл бұрын
The best of all. Focke-Wulf Fw 190 D-9 Long Nose
@michaelrmccall1920
@michaelrmccall1920 Жыл бұрын
Got a weird one for you:- the Aussie Boomerang. Severely underestimated little thing it was😁
@robertthomas3777
@robertthomas3777 Жыл бұрын
Wasn’t it based on the Brewster Buffalo?
@cesarcamba1
@cesarcamba1 Жыл бұрын
Excellent video. Great script, exciting images, realistic action. Entertaining and informative at the same time. Best use of KZfaq.
@TJ3
@TJ3 Жыл бұрын
Thank you very much!
@ukasz-zm9qc
@ukasz-zm9qc 7 ай бұрын
Realistic action? What are you talking about? These shots from games where bombers are shot down in short bursts from cannons are highly unrealistic. Watch some Reich Defense guncams for comparison. You can often see that bombers are shot at for several seconds and, even though damaged, they still fly.
@jerryjeromehawkins1712
@jerryjeromehawkins1712 Жыл бұрын
The 109 will always be my favorite... but man, the 190 is beautiful! 👍🏽🇺🇸
@cjm7685
@cjm7685 Жыл бұрын
The fact that I spin out in simulation all the time lol
@americanpatriot2422
@americanpatriot2422 Жыл бұрын
A video of the HE 219 and its combat history would be great.
@RogbodgeVideo
@RogbodgeVideo Жыл бұрын
Plus the story of how six were built entirely from spare parts!
@curtisbryce5096
@curtisbryce5096 Жыл бұрын
I have often wondered what it was like when the bullets being fired in these altercations eventually hit the ground.
@christx3326
@christx3326 Жыл бұрын
Like falling pebbles and rocks. Non lethal because they have lost their original velocity
@curtisbryce5096
@curtisbryce5096 Жыл бұрын
@@christx3326 Wow, your idea of lethal doesn't correspond with mine. I wouldn't want to be pelted by falling rocks.
@joostheylen2891
@joostheylen2891 Жыл бұрын
@@christx3326 If anything fals down from 5000 meters it is stil going extremly fast due to gravity
@Unbrutal_Rawr
@Unbrutal_Rawr Жыл бұрын
@@christx3326 Please don't comment on things you haven't the slightest idea about. The smallest-calibre ammo US aircraft used is . 30. To quote a Forbes article, _"Bullets of different sizes and calibers can puncture skin more easily: buckshot will perforate skin at 145 miles per hour and bullets from a .38 caliber revolver will do so at just 130 miles per hour. Bullets from a 9mm handgun may max out at speeds as low as 102 miles per hour. And a .30 caliber bullet, according to Mattoo's equation, _*_might do so at only 85 miles per hour."_* The . 30 1919 Browning, re-engineered as the M2/AN for aircraft use, has a muzzle velocity of 1908 mph. A bullet fired from that gun and being continually accelerated by gravity will never slow down to anything close to 85 mph, and will always remain deadly. The only contrary circumstance is if the bullet starts tumbling in the air, such as after being shot vertically, or bouncing off armour.
@kenneth9874
@kenneth9874 Жыл бұрын
@@christx3326 a bit more energy
@morgangale1388
@morgangale1388 Жыл бұрын
just great flying with that man wish my computer could play thease games
@Alexandre.Savine
@Alexandre.Savine Күн бұрын
USSR also had "parallel" lines of fighters with liquid cooled engines (Yak-1/7/9/3, MiG-3, LaGG-3) and with radial engines (I-16, I-153, La-5/7). Exactly same pattern of advantages and disadvantages.
@atlehunekonge
@atlehunekonge Жыл бұрын
The gunpods were unpopular due to the fact they would jam after semi-heavy maneuvers.
@kaushikganguli1091
@kaushikganguli1091 Жыл бұрын
Otto Kittel was the best Fw 190 ace with 267 kills. Followed by Walter Novotny with 258. The Fw 190 was superior to all aircraft in WW2 barring the Spitfire. Later, Tank did some amazing work with Indian Airforce by designing the Ajeet fighter in the 60s. Germany has always been a friend of India.
@richardcaves3601
@richardcaves3601 8 ай бұрын
All German claims over Soviets were exaggerated and if allied rules had applied, only 10% on average would have been allowed. Source: Post war RAF & USAAF analysis after consultation with Soviets. Found that about 70% of Nazis claims were dubious, with about 40% outright lies.
@CyberPrussian
@CyberPrussian 7 ай бұрын
Wow, nice overview. Not too long, not too short as well. Subscribed!
@SoloRenegade
@SoloRenegade Жыл бұрын
these are such low hanging fruit things. More interesting is the fact teh "power egg", everything from the firewall forward, was a field replaceable unit. Rather than service the engine in place, they just took teh whole thing off and put a brand new engine on while they refurbished teh engine elsewhere. Or the extremely innovative cowl radiator design that others tried and failed to copy.
@matthewfocke5360
@matthewfocke5360 Жыл бұрын
Thank you for your research...Note-worthy! Great information...
@laurentiu.panait2536
@laurentiu.panait2536 Жыл бұрын
Thanks for this documentary on the FW 190, "Butcher Bird" cool narration. Wish this chanel the best! It left me a tear at the end.
@yrjo5050
@yrjo5050 Жыл бұрын
Or was It ”Murder Bird” ?
@davidmackie8552
@davidmackie8552 Жыл бұрын
Thanks. I always loved the FW 190
@karls6234
@karls6234 Жыл бұрын
Great video! Thank you for creating it.
@threepot
@threepot Жыл бұрын
Could of mentioned Armin Faber mistakingly landing at Pembrey, South Wales, UK. His 190 was used as a comparison against the Spit 9 that was in production at the time. Armin's photo is displayed at Swansea airport,where he was apparently taken after capture?
@vixenpearce9496
@vixenpearce9496 7 ай бұрын
I actually read some declassified documents from ww2 about the Bf 109 they said that half of the Bf 109s ever produced were lost in takeoff and landing accident's and that the designers during ww2 actually had a design philosophy for the 109 but as time went on and the war was going bad for them the designers actually just began putting new stuff where it was convenient to access for them which led to the Bf 109 cockpit going from a wonderful well thought out cockpit to a mess which led the pilot to hunt around or get crammed in controls
@mcdonnelldouglasf-4ephanto607
@mcdonnelldouglasf-4ephanto607 Жыл бұрын
Nice work! ❤
@jessicabuckman9675
@jessicabuckman9675 Жыл бұрын
The P-51 Mustang, the P-47 Thunderbolt, the P-38 Lighting was more than a match for the German airplane.
@augustiner3821
@augustiner3821 5 ай бұрын
no
@gbsb202
@gbsb202 Жыл бұрын
Great Clip. But u did forget to mention, that the 190 was in opposite to the most fighter planes of the time except the p-47, a „boom and zoom“ fighter plane, which it was perfectly build for and made it even more deadly and one or even the best fighter plane of ww2. Because of this it was not as liked as the bf 109 by the German pilot, who didn’t got used the the different approach to the enemies. But when used probably it was with the use of the boom and zoom speed advantage better then the most fighters in turning and speed in air combat, even against all other allied fighter planes. (Source: A German fighter pilot I knew who served in ww2 till the end and even was assigned to fly the me 262 in 1945).
@neilfoster814
@neilfoster814 Жыл бұрын
Another little known fact about the FW 190 is that there was one unit that used a few factory modified aircraft into what was called a "Rammjager" (ram fighter)!. They had extra armour plating around the engine and wing leading edges to try to increase the aircraft's and pilots survivability. They also had a much reduced armament to account for the added armour plating. After a few intercepts, the 190's still suffered catastrophic damage, so the idea was shelved permanently.
@paoloviti6156
@paoloviti6156 Жыл бұрын
It is correct what you stated on the excellent video but I like to mention that the Fw 190 A-0 series from A-0 up to A-8 final variant with excellent roll rates when not loaded (perhaps one of the best among 2nd WW fighter) had some other very good advantages, first of all it was very versatile, and could carry much heavier loads then the Me 109, more battle "resistant" both with the fuselage and the radial engine that could dispense with vulnerable cooling pipes and radiators. Another important point is that the ailerons always remained relatively light even at high speed whilst the Me 109 much hardened at high speed but pilots like Eric Hartmann managed to overcome this problem. But there was issues: the BMW 801 series despite being a good engine the performance decreased at high altitudes (usually 6,000 mt and above), which reduced its effectiveness as a high-altitude interceptor. Despite all experiments it was finally to put in production the Fw 190-D9 powered the excellent Junkers Jumo 213 that will also power the Focke-Wulf Ta 152 that will represent the pinnacle of the German propeller airplanes. Those are my favourite airplanes and you did a great job as always 👍 👍👍
@jakobrinsdorf7791
@jakobrinsdorf7791 Жыл бұрын
I think suitable fits the jumo more... especially I comparison with allied engines it soaked up fuel at crazy rates and only managed to get performance by external systems like mw50 (it was basically a 210 on steroids). It did the job, even well but I wouldn't call it excellent
@michaelschmid9567
@michaelschmid9567 Жыл бұрын
@@jakobrinsdorf7791 With the fuel available for the German Airforce in WW2, it was the maximum you could get out of the low-octane fuel available for the Germans. Remember that the Merlin engine could only got these fantastic data with a special high octane from Irak, what was no where else available in the world in these time.
@paoloviti6156
@paoloviti6156 Жыл бұрын
@@jakobrinsdorf7791 I don't understand your logic because almost all late war airplanes in the west had engines on steroids and were having very high consumption in order to reach very high speed and altitudes not to mention being very mantainace intensive, ALL of them, without any exception. But regarding the Fw 190-D9 and the Ta 152H-1 were interceptors and over the ever shrinking Germany so it wasn't a big concern. What was a big concern was the chronic shortage of fuel and high quality fuel that really stopped Germany but remember that this "lousy" engine, not turbo-supercharged, although derived from the late Jumo 211 with the same 35 Lt it was extensively modified with different crankshaft and more it could push the Ta 152H-1 as among the fastest piston-engined fighters of the war, with a top speed comparable to the twin-engined Dornier Do 335. It was capable of 755 kilometres per hour (469 mph) at 13,500 metres (44,300 ft) using the GM-1 nitrous oxide boost. All this with low quality fuel....
@paoloviti6156
@paoloviti6156 Жыл бұрын
@@michaelschmid9567 exactly! It has been written elsewhere that with high quality fuel that it could achieve easily over 400 hp more provided that it could use higher quality lubricant....
@timranachan3224
@timranachan3224 Жыл бұрын
Enjoyed that mate 👍. Thanks very much!
@artawhirler
@artawhirler Жыл бұрын
Excellent video! Thanks!
@JohnDoe-sn7kh
@JohnDoe-sn7kh 2 ай бұрын
Thanks for making this stuff
@DJJAW11
@DJJAW11 Жыл бұрын
... Wunderbar 😎🥰🇩🇪 . I've always loved the Focke-wolf 190 🐺
@loddude5706
@loddude5706 Жыл бұрын
Great video. Maybe feature big flying boats one day? - Sunderland, PBY, Japan's H8K & the ever graceful Dornier Do 24? Given their all-nations air-sea rescue work & very long anti-sub patrols, their coffee pots must have heard some stories : )
@robertsandberg2246
@robertsandberg2246 Жыл бұрын
Yes! And maybe the Boeing 314 Clipper, and it's military role. Also, the emergency round the world flight a Pan Am crew made after the outbreak of the war in the Pacific. I can't describe how much I love that plane!
@fredericklee4821
@fredericklee4821 Жыл бұрын
Worth mentioning in context is the Lufwaffre gave the green light for the FW-190 to be produced because it required a radial engine. The Bf-109 used the inline-inverted V.
@Air-bear
@Air-bear 3 күн бұрын
Gadfly here 😕. You should mention that the shortage of essential materials also influenced the design of the Fokker-Wolf 190. Mostly the ability to use radial air cooled engine as more efficient.👍
@abbottsplace8080
@abbottsplace8080 Жыл бұрын
Awesome Video. This is very important work for future generations.
@hammiehammie7935
@hammiehammie7935 Жыл бұрын
Great video, I haven't played IL2 in years. Gotta get back into it :)
@calebrambis1775
@calebrambis1775 Жыл бұрын
The Bell P-39 Airacobra! One of my favorite warbirds!
@chuck.reichert83
@chuck.reichert83 Жыл бұрын
You should do a video on George Beurling, also know as "The Falcon of Malta".
@mjoelnir1899
@mjoelnir1899 7 ай бұрын
The landing gear of the Bf109 was folding outwards into the wing because it was fixed to the fuselage. The reason was to be able to detach the wings having the fuselage still standing on the landing gear. The choice of the radial engine for the FW190 was a design requirement. It was based on the availability of engines. The DB601, 603 or 605 was in short supply whereas enough BMW801 were available. The FW190 D got the Jumo 213 for high altitude use.
@trolleysparks3941
@trolleysparks3941 Жыл бұрын
Awesome: Super video. Taking your content with a grain of salt, not wishing to argue petty historical issues. But your graphics / videos are awesome. Wow. Better than being there. Terrific & Thanks.
@conceptalfa
@conceptalfa Жыл бұрын
Great documentary👍👍👍!
@petermathieson5692
@petermathieson5692 Жыл бұрын
What plane to cover next? The Ki-44 Tojo. Interesting evolution in design philosophy. Or the Ki-61 to Ki-100 story.
@MillwalltheCat
@MillwalltheCat Жыл бұрын
Good vid. Thought you might have mentioned the PKS12 Autopilot that was fitted to the Fw190, though.
@RogueAce93
@RogueAce93 Жыл бұрын
Another great presentation, TJ!! For other aircraft to cover, I’d suggest the Hawker Hurricane!
@patriciosilvarobalino9832
@patriciosilvarobalino9832 Жыл бұрын
Excelent video. I loved it.
@r.s.i8753
@r.s.i8753 Жыл бұрын
Really good Video! Never knew these facts about 190! Suggestions for the next video, Ki - 84 or J2M or N1K1 or Ki 61 from japan Typhoon from brits g55 or re.2005 from italy
@sigeberhtmercia767
@sigeberhtmercia767 Жыл бұрын
Add the Hawker Tempest to that list.
@danberry20
@danberry20 7 ай бұрын
A focking great video about the Focke Wulf 190. It was a great focking plane.
@A-1-E11
@A-1-E11 Жыл бұрын
This is my favorite plane. Im in your Discord and can't wait to help in a video that include the Fw190, and thank you very much :)
@jean-mariejm7404
@jean-mariejm7404 Жыл бұрын
excellent video and informatrion narrated . bravo
@johnparsons1573
@johnparsons1573 Жыл бұрын
Fantastic video. One of my favorite airplanes
@OliverVonLindenthal
@OliverVonLindenthal Жыл бұрын
Great video! This channel now has a new subscriber.
@erichammond9308
@erichammond9308 Жыл бұрын
A couple of errors though, the Fw-190 used an air cooled radial engine in order to not use the same engine being put in the bf-109. The added benefit of it's resistance to damage and greater power - to - weight ratio made it an easy choice to make. Also, the contemporary P-47 had already shown that larger radial engines were capable of producing sufficient HP to more than overcome the drag they induce.
@kevinohanlon2187
@kevinohanlon2187 Жыл бұрын
Really really interesting. How about covering Yak 3.
@simitarknut2201
@simitarknut2201 Жыл бұрын
Would you or did you ever make a video about the coast guard version of the B-17 that dropped a single rigid lifeboat by parachute?
@kansasscout4322
@kansasscout4322 Жыл бұрын
Later models matched the P51 and Updated Spitfires for speed. Early P51's had different engines and cockpit covers and were not the match at that time. It was the last year of the war that all fighters on both sides upgraded significantly in speed. I maintain that with good pilots F 190 equaled the Mustang. It has always been pilots that made the difference when performance was similar. Extreme speed was not as useful as people think. You could only use it for brief moments. Engines could not take it for long periods and fuel was quickly exhausted. Good job on the armaments. Good video.
@michaelchristensen5421
@michaelchristensen5421 6 ай бұрын
Your #1, the pilot use to be a ground crewman that became a pilot after training. For some reason I was thinking the engine failed on the functional check flight, not several days later.
How ONE German Pilot Became the Allies Worst Nightmare
34:10
TJ3 History
Рет қаралды 571 М.
The Spitfire's most feared opponent
13:45
Imperial War Museums
Рет қаралды 731 М.
1❤️#thankyou #shorts
00:21
あみか部
Рет қаралды 38 МЛН
ONE MORE SUBSCRIBER FOR 6 MILLION!
00:38
Horror Skunx
Рет қаралды 15 МЛН
100❤️
00:20
Nonomen ノノメン
Рет қаралды 63 МЛН
What History Never Told You About the B-29 Superfortress
25:45
TJ3 History
Рет қаралды 1 МЛН
5 Things You Never Knew About the Japanese Zero
13:30
TJ3 History
Рет қаралды 413 М.
The 100th Bomb Group is Wiped Out - Münster 1943
26:39
The Operations Room
Рет қаралды 508 М.
Why Was The Fw-190A So Fast?
32:48
Greg's Airplanes and Automobiles
Рет қаралды 933 М.
The reason Germany failed on D-Day (Ft. Jonathan Ferguson)
23:26
Imperial War Museums
Рет қаралды 274 М.
The Ultimate Guide to WW2 German Tank Destroyers
24:59
The Tank Museum
Рет қаралды 346 М.
5 Things You Never Knew About the SBD "Dauntless" Dive Bomber
22:54
The Haunting Final Words of a Famous German Fighter Ace
11:56
TJ3 History
Рет қаралды 440 М.
When a German Ace Taunted a P-47C
9:07
Yarnhub
Рет қаралды 2,8 МЛН
The Brutal Reality of Flying the F6F Hellcat
25:54
TJ3 History
Рет қаралды 240 М.
Grand Final | IEM Dallas 2024 | КРИВОЙ ЭФИР
6:53:16
SL4M & Counter-Strike
Рет қаралды 603 М.