+Ed Sou For The Revenant

+Ed Sou *12 years later* "Maybe this will be my year" *14 years later* "I could? Maybe? WIn? Hopefully?" *21 years later* "ALRIGHT COME ON NOW" *23 years later* "I don't even care at this po- wait, I won? I WON?!"

@@_fullsunflower omg haechan

Lol

Ja si supira que tardo 23 años para conseguirlo

I agree..Big mistake.

cihat yıldız it's from the movie

Hahahhahhah good one

“Male Celebrities who are SO MUCH Hotter & Talented than Leonardo DiCaprio” imdb.com/list/ls058930557/ Thank me later…. ;-)

I Don't Care were the best speech for Sam Gerard to say on that night.

yes, i still wake up terrorized at night!

Yes man , the man was the meanest

That's major facts right there

I think Leo was better here than in The Revenant

Leo wasn't even that good in the revenant. Tom Hardy way out acted him

I agree. I like TLJ but Fieness should have won. TLJ had a much stronger claim for supporting actor for his role as Thaddeus Stevens in Lincoln. I think that was why his head was shaved.

Ralph Fieness was great but John Malkovich is better🥱

No matter who won, the others would've been robbed. Have you seen all those movies? Those performances were insane and they all hold up.

@@jec1ny Lincoln came out over 20 years after Tommy winning this Oscar, pretty sure the head shaved has nothing to do with that film 🤣

Tommy was better

DiCaprio? HAHAHAHAHAHAHA

@Ryan Akwar amazing but not even close to as good as Ralph, he easily had the best performance out of the nominees.

@@tizyman7120 have you seen what's eating gilbert grape? His acting was really good in it for such a young age, all nominees deserved that award.

@@tizyman7120 I agree. I wouldn't have let DiCaprio win over Postlethwaite, let alone Fiennes. DiCaprio honestly overacted in a pretty single note, over dramatic and hammy acting portrayal. Anyone who thinks that DiCaprio should have won over Fiennes(whose subtle, nuanced and genuinely terrifying performance is regarded as the best supporting actor performance of the entire 90s decade and one of the greatest villainous performances ever) is arguably an idiot who knows both about acting. Everyone in the world agrees that this award was indeed Fiennes who is literally topping all alternative lists.

@@The420BrownKid I completely agree.

Tommy has had the better career, but Ralph-was definitely deserving. It’s hard to choose between the two of them-but ever there was ever gonna be a tie-this was it.

No? Not even close

@@dylanrodriguez4006 Not even close? Are you fucking kidding me?

@@dylanrodriguez4006 shut up Ralph desearve that

@@mariodanielreyesmartinez6995 no he didn't. Watch fugitive. Ralph was great, but tommy had more meat in it

that too, acting naturally at he same time. He didn't need to sound like Thor to be intimidating.I don't think he even yelled much, but everything with him was so evil

He did this...he did that. You act as if his character was based on a real person. 😂

@@havrisen6620 ehmm... Is that sarcasm? Because goeth was real

I’ve researched this. Schindler’s List is a work of FICTION. It even says in small print that it’s a work of fiction.Yes, there was a man named Goeth that was commandant at a concentration camp in Poland. He was tried and murdered. As far as the movie, it’s fiction. Sorry, it isn’t my fault.

Hav Risen No Amon Göth is a real Person.

I hate it when they do that it's not fair it should be purely performance based

true

Well yeah. Pretty much the same with Leo's Oscar this year.

Sans Yeah, "The Revenant" was far from Leo's best performance.

Yes, Fiennes should have won hands down by a million country miles (Leo was very good but Fiennes was way way way excellent). The Academy did the same thing the previous year when Robert Downey Jr's portrayal of Chaplin lost out to Al Pacino in Scent of a Woman. Pacino already had several nominations for earlier work, one of which should have won an Oscar (Godfather) but they didn't give him the Oscar so they took it from RDJ for a less deserving piece of work.

Hey man, i used to think that Di Caprio was just a pretty face. But he is a damn good actor

Robson1898vascao after Scorsese yes before that he was just average

I'm not a big fan of Leo, and I hate that many people almost think it's the end of the world that he hasn't won an Oscar yet, but his role in " What's Eating Gilbert Grape " is extremely difficult to play well, and it's not something I believe any actor can do. It really stands out from all the other performances I've seen from him, and I wish to see him play a role as challenging as that one again. I know he can win an Oscar if he does that

Josef Hautala Gilbert Grape was one of his first roles and he was just a kid or teen , so there is so many great child actors that after they grow up they suck or they are just average maybe that was Leo's case thats why I dont take that one as a reference , Catch me if you can, in that one he was just OK nothing that an average actor teaming with a great director cannot do , the only movie where he really did a great job and actually made me change my mind about his work was The Aviator , in that movie he really blow up the screen , very impressive performance and after that he just got better and better thats why I said that before Scorcese he was just a pretty baby face with average acting skills

I don't think anybody could replicate what Fiennes did. He wasn't like your typical loud mouthed villain, who used his voice to sound intimidating. But, rather he just played like a normal guy, though so intimidating and psychotic

StopTouchingMe93 At first I thought TLJ stood for “The Last Jedi” then I realized you abbreviated the name of Tommy Lee Jones! Still I love Last Jedi and Fiennes was robber!

James Moyner I read “The Last Jedi” too lol

Completely agree. Fiennes was by far THE best in the entire category. Followed by Postlethwaite as the second best.

Ye

So random channel dicaprio was great but fiennes was on a different level. anyway, i agree both gave better performances than tommy lee jones.

“Male Celebrities who are SO MUCH Hotter & Talented than Leonardo DiCaprio” imdb.com/list/ls058930557/ Thank me later…. ;-)

I wonder how did you meassure that? Come on, it's not sport

Groundhog Day 1993 is AWESOME!That list is bullshit tbh. For example, Michael Jackson was on that list... I mean at some point he started looking like a literal lizard. Also, Shane Dawson was on that list. Is Shane hot? Is he a “great actor”? I didn’t think so. I didn’t bother to look through the whole list because it was obviously just a huge collection of every actor u could find just to prove a dumb point. And just to clarify I’m not even a Leo fan girl. Tbh if u look thru even 1 page of that list you’ll come across quite a few ugly people 🤭🤭 U also said anyone who disagrees w/ u doesn’t know anything about acting. I’d like to consider myself someone who knows quite a bit since I’ve watched so many movies and say that Leo was fucking phenomenal in that movie. U said that u don’t like Martin Scorsese (wtf why wouldn’t u?) and u said that u would understand y he would work with Robert deniro (he’s awesome) and the only reason Scorsese made so many movies with Leo is cuz Robert told him abt Leo and said he should work with him. Sorry for having a rant 😙😙

Postlehwaite was incredible

+Paulo Araujo Indeed.

Completely agree

Perhaps because Fiennes was portraying a Nazi war criminal and that doesn't go down in Hollywood.

+M Minskie Kate Winslet The Reader?

Fiennes deserved that more than anyone. Following him, Malkovich, followed by Leo.

Peter the Man So did Tommy Lee in the Fugitive

@Ben Hill You know that is the most laziest and dullest to way to critizise an actor and that way it can be said about anybody "Marlon brando just applied some makeup and made some wheezy accent in the Godfather".Ralph fiennes was fantastic and it is a fact, weather or not he should win is something else.

@@irtezaahmed4554 So true my friend. It seems that Brett needs a lesson on the essence of being a great actor. His reply was incredibly ignorant and it also says a lot about him in general. People like Brett just place a enormous burden on the backs of society. They go through day by day spreading hate and disregard for the beauty of life that most of us enjoy. I can only hope he experiences a epiphany and opens his eyes to see the true nature of life that most of us know and enjoy such as a amazing acting performance.

@@bigdawg1758 Beautifully said, i hope that now people start to recognise and appreciate true art more than generic stuff.

He earned this award, for all of himself the greatest film's

He was but not as good as fiennes who was robbed

@@vvthetalentlessduo6976 yes he was excellent as well!

Not better than Fiennes(Schindler's List) , Kilmer(Tombstone), Postlethwaite(In The Name), Kingsley(Schindler's List), Richard Jordan(Gettysburg), Washington(Philadelphia) in their much layered and complex performances!!

Syed Izaan you’re right about fiennes but I think Leo was the second best that year.

@@vvthetalentlessduo6976 Nope. I disagree. DiCaprio overacted in a pretty one dimensional showy Oscar baity role. I can't believe anyone who has actually watched Tombstone, Gettysburg, In The Name Of The Father or know even a little bit about acting, subtlety and depth can say DiCaprio gave better performance than these guys. Val Kilmer in Tombstone and Richard Jordan in his performance in Gettysburg are far superior to DiCaprio's performance. It was totally Val vs Ralph vs Richard in terms of merit, and I go with Fiennes in Schindler's List. It's unfortunate how many bitches and simps DiCaprio carries around internet for being pretty in Titanic. Bang average actor with tendency to be absolutely garbage at times.

“Male Celebrities who are SO MUCH Hotter & Talented than Leonardo DiCaprio” imdb.com/list/ls058930557/ Thank me later…. ;-)

I'm thanking you now for being so committed to one of Bill Murray's films.

Fiennes did as well

Not over Fiennes or even Postlethwaite at all. Technically, Fiennes and Postlethwaite gave way better performances. And if I add the snubbed performances as well, like Richard Jordan in Gettysburg, Ben Kingsley in Schindler's List and most importantly Val Kilmer in Tombstone, DiCaprio is out of the race by a country mile.

Hello Evelyn I see happiness all around you , can I please share from it ❤?

I have always said and still believe that if Tom Hanks had not been nominated for "Philadelphia", I truly believe Liam would have won . Any other group of nominees that Tom Hanks is not in, Liam Neeson wins that Oscar.

It was to make up for not for giving it to Tommy Lee Jones for JFK

Ok to be fair this was a particularly strong year!!

Danielle has soft lips no repeats.

@Montravius Daniel Technically both were. If Leonardo won, I wouldn’t be mad at Ralph losing, same thing if Ralph won. But Tommy Lee Jones? Nah fuck that.

Pete Poselwaith was amazing as well

Yep

You mean "I pardon you"😂

He was great in it

***** you must've not seen "Schindler's List"

One thing is for sure...the academy didn't see either

did you see his performance in 'Three Burials'

It was just Tommy lee jones playing Tommy lee Jones. He did a fine job, but he was nothing special. He was not only nowhere near as good as any of the other nominees (especially Fiennes) but he shouldn’t even have been nominated, Sean Penn should have been nominated instead for Carlitos Way or Val Kilmer in Tombstone.

Nah, Fiennes absolutely deserved it. He resembled Amon Goeth so well that the survivors of Plaszow actually thought it was him, one of them even shook uncontrollably

Hello I see happiness all around you , can I please share from it ❤?

Agreed. Just rewatched it.

Tommy Lee Jones beating Ralph Fiennes that year was a joke and a miscarriage of justice. That entire movie was a joke... The Fugitive? Are you kidding me? Lt.Gerard beat Amon Göth???? 😢

Would you consider yourself to be a good person? How many lies have you told, and what do you call someone who lies? Have you ever stolen something, and what do you call someone who steals? Have you ever taken God’s name in vain (very serious; in Old Testament times, the Jews wouldn’t even say the name of God for fear of blasphemy) - even ‘OMG’? One more: Jesus said whoever looks at a woman to lust after her has already committed adultery in his heart; have you ever looked with lust? Well I’m not judging you - but if you’ve done these things then you’re a liar, thief, blasphemer and adulterer-at-heart; that’s how seriously God takes sin. He is Holy (perfectly good/righteous and separate from sin) which means that H e is perfect in justice - and if He were to judge you by the moral law (we’ve already looked at 4 commandments) would you be innocent or guilty? Heaven or Hell? The answer is hell - the wrath of God upon you for your sin. Is that concerning? But fortunately, God’s will is not that you perish. He wants all men everywhere to be saved. So do you know what He did for us guilty sinners? In self-giving mercy, He sent His Son Jesus Christ. He lived the perfect life that we should have lived - tempted at all points and yet He NEVER sinned. Through His life, being in very nature God, He revealed God to men; but we in our hatred condemned Him to death. On that cross as Jesus suffered, He took on the sin of the world and was judged in our place; receiving God’s wrath. You and I broke God’s law, but Jesus paid the fine. God can justly forgive us. On that cross He died, then He was buried, but 3 days later He was raised from the dead - conquering death and Hell and ushering in The Kingdom of God. He then ascended to the right hand of God the Father (where He came from) now Lord of the living and the dead. God has fixed a date when He will judge the world in righteousness. What you need to do is repent (In humility, acknowledge your sin before God and turn to a relationship with Him) and trust ALONE in Jesus Christ and His work on the cross; and God will grant you the gift of the Holy Spirit. Then be baptised. When you place your trust in Jesus - the Lord and Saviour - these things will happen: 1) God will forgive the sins that you have committed; they were paid for by Jesus at the cross. 2) The perfect life that Jesus lived will be credited to you. He will find you holy and blameless on judgement day (and now), as Christ’s righteousness covers you. 3) You receive a place in Christ’s kingdom as an adopted child of God. God becomes your Father. Eternal life isn’t just about living forever, but a personal relationship with God Himself. That life can start now; The Father will reveal Himself to you if you seek Him. 4) God doesn’t just save you from the penalty of your sin (Hell). He can save you from the power of sin itself. Whoever practices sin is a slave of sin; but when you repent and believe the gospel [WHICH HAS BEEN DESCRIBED] the Holy Spirit comes to dwell in you and sanctify you (working in you to further abandon sin and turn to the will of God). When the end of the age comes, and eternity begins, this work will be brought to completion as you are finally freed from the presence of sin. Jesus offers to take away your sin and to give you His righteousness; you must receive it by faith. Choose this day if you will align with the world, or with Jesus and His kingdom - only His is eternal. ROMANS 10:9 - If you confess with your mouth Jesus as Lord and believe in your heart that God raised Him from the dead, you will be saved

Yes

So true. The ultra far left hollywood PC liberal academy could never give one who plays a evil Nazi character a award. I'm totally surprised that they chose Schindlers List for the best picture.that year. I guess they basically had no choice. If they didn't give Schindlers List the award there would have been a uprising. A possible investigation into hush money payments for the best picture winner would need to be considered.

Loved him. One of the best actors England has produced. He waa absolutely on par with DDL in ITNOTF.

Hahahahahah you right

Lol, he's the youngest one here, he doesn't care

Sadly...

I would say The Wolf of Wall Street is his greatest but this one is amazing as well.

Kunga Sagar the Wolf of Wall Street was more outstanding

The Aviator > The Wolf...

Not true. All his performances are great, not just this one

True

Hello Sandra I see happiness all around you , can I please share from it ❤?

@@morrisonnewton236 dude she posted that 9 years ago what are you hoping for here?

I don't think anybody would play as well as Fienned did either. His personification of Goth was not your typical loud mouthed ,trying to scare people by yelling or using voice to tyr to intimidate his preys type.. Yet, he was so evil and probably among the most memorable villains of all time.

This is one reason why DiCaprio and Fiennes are my top two picks for the Oscar that year. They were both so great, but to me, DiCaprio was a little better. I don't see DiCaprio when I see Whats Eating Gilbert Grape, but I do see Tommy Lee Jones when I see The Fugitive.

I'm going to watch Ralph's movie again. He is an amazing actor, Leo too.

Have to disagree with this. Sam Gerard was a role that any actor could play, but to play such a terrifying monster such as Amon Goeth, and yet bring a little humanity to him (not much but still), that's what I call REAL acting. Fiennes should have won, IMO. Nothing against TLJ, but I feel the wrong man won for what was the easiest role out of all five nominees that year.

Denzel whashington in Philadelphia

​@@allnba7057he was consider Leading.

@@harmodiogonzalez5356he was? Hanks would’ve been lead. Dont think you can have two lead nominees from the same movie.

Isn't anyone else gonna mention GROUNDHOG DAY (1993), with Bill Murray, got snubbed by the Academy Awards....? :-O

Least deserving Oscar ever

He was literally 4th best in that category. Leo, Pete, Ralph performances were all so much better 🤦‍♂️

Tommy Lee Jones: I don't care!

Indeed.

Fiennes more than Neeson IMO, as Tom Hanks was really good in Philadelphia, to me TLJ performance in The Fugitive wasn't anything that special.

NO,Tom Hanks was really good in Philadelphia

And Leo, he convinced thousands of people with such honesty that he was an actor who had a mental disability instead of an actor playing a character with a mental disability. It was his first major film role at only 16 years old too. IMO that category for that year was one of the few in which it could've been anyone's Oscar as they were all so talented in their roles.

nope... just because he didn't play a maniac which is favored with mainstream audiences, Tommy deserved this award... if anything, it is a travesty that Denzel was not nomiated for Philadelphia. Thtat year was a monster class of great performances. Either or deserved to win.

CLASSIC!!!

What about John?

I did feel a bit sorry for Sir Ben. But if he and Raloh had both been nominated they would have split the vote.

I disagree with you. TLJ was rightfully the best.

Tommy lee jones dgaf about this awards lol,so they need to stop arguing 😂.

That's a good list, I could get behind that.

Liam Neeson should find the Academy Award judge members and kill them!

You've only had 22 years to watch it! ha.

I have seen The Fugitive several times. And even though Tommy Lee Jones was entertaining he was not as good as the rest of the nominees. Also you shouldn't make assumptions about people.

+Robson1898vascao I saw that movie more than once and Tommy Lee Jones was very good - but not oscar worthy at all.

I did. "The Fugitive" is one of my favorite movies and TLJ is fun to watch in it. But in no universe where we're talking about seriously impactful acting should TLJ have beaten Ralph Fiennes.