exactly, owned by is not the same as made by we don't say that paintings are the work of the collectors who buy them do we? it's absurd

I agree with you! That is what I was just thinking too. Twentieth Century Fox and the creator where the ones who did the job, Disney just acquired not too long ago also.

Exactly. It may be owned by Disney, but that doesn't make it a Disney movie.

My thoughts as well.

Yeah, I can't take anyone seriously who starts with Anastasia when talking about Disney films. Kinda makes it hard to trust whoever did the research for this script.

I will miss her so much

I KNEW that was her voice!

Beginning clip... I went ... "angela" sad sigh. I've never seen it but i knew she voiced in it.

I don't think I ever knew that! Thanks for sharing!

@@rebekahhesketh1220 I didn’t know that either

Thanks

Wowsers

Did you know that assassin's Creed unity is responsible for them being able to rebuild Notre Dame after the fire?? I believe they had the schematics Ubisoft for Notre Dame and it led to builders being able to rebuild Notre Dame piece by piece in the proper way.

The only one who did two disney princess singing voice.

Definitely! Lea Salonga needs more acknowledgement. A lot of people still think that Ming-Na Wen (speaking voice of Princess Mulan) and Linda Lakin (speaking voice of Princess Jasmine) sang those songs in the animated films. No offense to Ming-Na Wen and Linda Lakin. Without them, our favorite Disney Princesses would not have come alive. 👸🏽👸🏽💖

@@egisantoso949 sings so good, Disney asked for her twice.

@@moonprincesst.s.h.4ever115 I agree. Let me just add Jodi Benson (The Little Mermaid) , this is when i started to notice voice actors and their amazing talents. Voiced and sang Ariel. :)

i was about to say that.

Wrong. Not only did Anna Anderson claim to be Anastasia, she filed a lawsuit to attest to that claim. Of course, she was mentally unwell, and it's hard to say how much of her claim was herself and how much was suggested by others.

The Russian royal family was related to the british royal family though queen victoria and they had hemophilia.

She didn't initially claim she was that's true, then she went back and forth but later fully embraced the identity and basically lived off it for the rest of her life.

She was also a ruler in her own right, being the heiress to the kingdom of Aquitaine, the biggest dukedom. Her court was very focussed on the arts, she really encouraged the art of the troubadours. She was adamant to rule her lands herself and not let them be ruled by her husband, thus loosing their own identity. She went with her first husband, the king of France, on crusade to the holy land. Then she got her marriage annulled after 15 years, and married Henry Platangenet right away. He, I believe, was some 10 years younger than she. She bore him 8 children, led her oldest sons on a rebellion against their own father, got locked away by Henry for 15 years in a convent, and lastly survived her husband. She was brilliant!!!

Yes, Richard was the third son, and John the fifth (fourth legitimate). The first died in a campaign against their father, Henry II. Before all the family feuding, Eleanor had married Henry (then just a Duke) just six weeks after annulling her marriage to the King Louis VII of France, a huge insult to him. At the time, England and Aquitaine controlled more of France than France did. Oh, and no British nobility could speak the peasant Anglo-Saxon-Dane language of the country, since they were all Norman French. The first British King who spoke a modern version of English was Henry IV around 1400, about 350 years after William the Bastard took advantage of Harold Godwinson's victorious but depleted army (after defeating the Danes way up north) at the Battle of Hastings (way down south). By the way, Harold II was the last English king to sit on the British throne, nearly 1000 years ago. The rest have been French-Normans, Scots, a Dutch husband (William) and Germans (House of Hanover, renamed Windsor).

@@annamo9354 she was put under house arrest. Went to a convent when John was on the throne

@@fmmaj9noname332 Richard didn't like his father, but didn't campaign again him.

@@joannefalkinder393 Yes he did, during the Great Rebellion of 1173-74. Also, after Young King Henry died while fighting Richard in 1183, Henry II asked Richard to cede Aquitaine to John, since Richard was already heir to England, Normandy and Anjou. Aquitaine in the southwest was the largest and richest duchy in France, and belonged to Richard's mother, Eleanor, whom Henry had put in prison for the Rebellion. Richard refused, allied against Henry with Philip II of France, and drove Henry to his death in 1189 after forcing him to surrender Aquitaine and name him the rightful heir.

Ugh me too.

❤❤

Same!!!! Love weird history lol

😁I caught that, too

yeah, a huge peice of childhood is gone. it seems to be 2022's theme taking people who are legendary.

yes

Kind of glad they left the girls out in this case. The film has absolutely nothing to do with romance and it’s probably better that way. However, kuzco does get a love in interest in the show Emperor’s New School, Malina. Mata…Nina…Malina…huh. Tho idk how that show ended (i think it was disney’s traditional two season cancellation)

The creators of Disney's "Lilo and Stitch" wanted to animate an authentic Hawaiian hula accurately to be included in their film. They went a hula school in Hawaii to see what goes into creating one. They talked to the headmaster about the different steps for the hands and feet that women would use in a real hula as a tutorial. After they recorded the hula they wanted on videotape, the director told all the animators to draw every single hand, feet, body, and head gesture accurately. As a result, most Hawaiians agree that the hula used in that film was real. Even the song, "He Mele No Lilo," was sung in Hawaiian having a male lead and a Hawaiian children's choir. When the movie was released, Disney also made a version using the Hawaiian language as a tribute to the people of those beautiful islands and their culture. The people of Hawaii were pleased with the movie. Ever since that film has been released, one can find many short videos of people recreating the hula in "Lilo and Stitch." Finally, I cannot believe that Disney wants to do a live action remake using a lot of CGI. It's not been a good move on Disney's part, and they should focus on creating new content instead of rehashing the same movies with these endless and pointless remakes.

There has been no official word they are even interested in a live action Lilo and Stitch. So that is just a rumor right now at best.

I miss her

She will be missed

I will miss her. That was a coincidence at the start of the video to put her there, lol!

I’m assuming you mean Encanto? Maybe autocorrect?

@@persassyjackson816 yeah they mean encanto

According to ALL film development pieces AND an in-film map of the Encanto stating its founding, Pedro died in 1900. So the triplets were born on the first anniversary of the Thousand Days' War. That means the majority of the movie takes place in 1951. It also means Bruno is a month and a half older than Héctor Rivera (b. November 30, 1900).

she truly was a underrated character 😔

She is my inspiration! I wanna live in a broken ol' boat in a tree in a bayou!

The movie is also underrated.

i love the movie

I just posted they are making a new anatacisa

They won't. Because it's a 25 year old film that has no chance of making successful merchandise anymore. Also, just because Disney owns the rights to the movie doesn't make it a Disney movie.

@@vetarlittorf1807 They released a Funko of her. You are racist against Anastasia.

@@vetarlittorf1807 Disney actually thanked me for being an Anastasia fan. That’s the same thing as having Nickelodeon without the Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles or DC without Shazam

@@kikicallahan3662 Lol. I don't think you know what racist means...

Disney acquired it with Fox. They literally mentioned it in the video.

@@siniebeck4821 agreed

It doesn't make sense

@@adriangarcia543 just because it doesn’t make sense to you it makes sense to others.

@@adriangarcia543 Yeah

True but that’s why they specifically mentioned that they’re including Fox in this when they normally wouldn’t. Mostly bc Anastasia was pretty perfect for this video, it was hard to leave out.

@@Miyanoai14 they should keep Fox in their Disney related video from now on.

"And Princess Leia is not a Disney princess" The moment Disney made a movie with her in it is the moment she became a Disney princess... sorry to break it to you Lol Anastasia however is not since Disney didn't make the film. they just own the rights to it.

@@Shawnchapp That's Not How Da Force Works! Anastasia = Disney Princess

We are confused me as a young kid precisely because she was not a Disney princess in anyway shape or form, yes, Disney owns the property now, but still, she is not a Disney princess in the way most other Disney princesses are princesses. She’s not damsel on distress, OK she is in the first movie, but she’s more of a political princess, a concept I would not come to understand, for at least another 10 years, first saw snapshots of Star Wars when I was about five or so, so you’re taking another 5 to 10 years before I realize what a political princess is, and was the only thing she hasn’t common with most Disney princesses is that she’s most of the time wearing some thing that looks like a dress

You could say it was a “Maledicto”

And right before that, he mentions the play with "that Oedipus thing"-he and Meg saw Oedipus Rex, one of the more famous classic Greek plays (famous in part because of Freud naming a... certain complex after him, which makes his line, "Man, I thought I had problems!" way funnier imo).

The video mentioned that…

she was the mrs potts and the duchess

to your second point: IF Anastasia was truly alive at that time, then she would technically be the last known member of royal blood, so until she married and had a male heir, then yes. She would be the heir to the throne of Russia. Besides, Catherine the Great was an Empress, so why couldn't Anastasia be one (had the revolution not occurred, that is)

@@eternasapphiremoon81 1. Anastasia's NOT the last known member of the Romanov family AT THE TIME, as *Nicholas II had surviving brothers, uncles, cousins, & nephews* who have much higher claims than Anastasia; to reiterate the Pauline Laws, *strict male line succession* à la Japan, and only then can they entertain female succession if truly there were no more males left 2. your argument is weak: 2.a. Catherine was a *Romanov by marriage* ; she was born a German princess by the name of *Sophie Friederike Auguste von Anhalt-Zerbst-Dornburg* 2.b. *Catherine only became Empress Regnant via coup d'état* , not helped by the fact that her husband Peter III was unpopular with all sectors of Russian society, specially the military (due to his open Prussian sympathies and a huge Frederick fanboy)

No, indeed. It wasn't produced by Disney at the time. They've bought it now, though.

They did say in the intro they will be including films from Fox acquisition.

@@katepausig8562 true

That's true she was a real person just like pocahontas nobody thinks about that

They still didn’t make it. That’s like saying a sports team owner should take credit for championships they didn’t own the team for and therefore they didn’t build

@@DigiRangerScott PREACH IT!💪🐺✊

not exactly, any movie made by pixar pre acquisition is called a pixar film, like the first toy story, any movie made after the acquisition is a disney-pixar film you don't call art made by da vinci a Smith piece if some guy named smith owns it, the credit goes to creators how is this a difficult concept?

@@RosenrotRtLiebchen87 Pixar films were always called Disney-Pixar films because they were partners from the very start.

We'll always remember you

Thank you for pointing that out, I was going to say the exact same thing on the civilization, it was a Mongol civilization, and yes, we talked about in my two semesters of Mongol in history. My college days are long, a bit insane, and sometimes convoluted, but that sticks in my mind. If I remember, properly, it existed before Timin, the proper name of Genghis Khan. Please burn dictation for screwing any of this up.

In some cultures people cut their hair as a sign of mourning. Do you by chance know if this holds true for the era of Chinese culture Mulan takes place in? Perhaps it was a symbolic gesture of Milan mourning her old life and coming to terms with potentially never seeing her family again.

@@rockinrootbeer1795 yes, but if it were, it'd be very disrespectful for her to do that while none of her elders passed away at that time, and I think that scene in the movie is trying to show her transform into a soldier/recruit, ie. a man

Not only was she a great actress, but you are actually correct! She was Dowager Empress Marie!

Corrections: Shan-Yu and Genghis Khan.

Thank you so much for the support :)

I can't like this comment enough.

it’s a shame really bond only won because its association with the classic franchise I think other than that dos oruguitas would have won. But it’s nominated for an ama!

It is now, Since Disney bought out fox

diney owns fox so it is disney

@@iamchristian1129 not exactly, any movie made by pixar pre acquisition is called a pixar film, like the first toy story, any movie made after the acquisition is a disney-pixar film you don't call art made by da vinci a Smith piece if some guy named smith owns it, the credit goes to creators how is this a difficult concept?

Pocahontas isn’t accurate at all and many Native Americans have said it’s a great disservice to them

also wasn't it kinda pointless to cut her hair short to appear as a man? didn't they often have long hair tied up?

@@RosenrotRtLiebchen87 men didn't even cut their hair so the whole cut hair scene is redundant. It's meant to make her look manly, but just putting it up is what they did. But I suppose they needed something to show her abondonong her femininity.

fr tho

Really?? I’m intrigued

Yes

Thank you !

I was gonna say this

People mistaking Anastasia as a Disney film is a major facepalm, like honestly.🤦🏽‍♂️

I agree

Well, technically it is one now, in the sense of being owned by Disney.

Same with Fern Gully All Dogs Go To Heaven, A Troll in Central Park, Thumbelina... All were amazing films. Yes they were done by 20th Century Fox. But since the company was bought by Disney, they are under that umbrella, same with Lucasfilm. (yes Lucasfilm made Star Wars, Indiana Jones, etc..and yet they are now Disney properties and still their own entities)

Disney own fox so it is Disney

The repairs are not over yet, but a lot is still there.