The Republic is amazing.

Hello Philosophy Vibe may you make a video on “Requalism” 👇 “Requalism Etymology of Requalism: The term “Requalism” is derived from the combination of the words “re,” meaning back, “equal” shortened to “qual” for even, and “ism” for process. The Components of Requalism Requalism is a belief system that can be broken down into four key components, which are interconnected and work together to form the foundation. These components include: 1. Interconnectedness of All Things in the Universe: Requalism emphasizes the idea that everything in the universe is interconnected, and that understanding this interconnectedness is essential for gaining a deeper understanding of oneself and the world around them. This concept is based on the Reflective Equilibrium Hypothesis, which suggests that the universe is a reflection of interconnected principles. 2. Understanding The Nature of Identity Through Interests, Perceptions, and Values: Requalism places a strong emphasis on understanding the nature of identity through interests, perceptions, and values. Interests serve as stimuli that capture attention, perceptions involve the processing of interests, and values are patterns of interest that shape an individual’s identity. This concept is derived from the IPV Theory, which is a part of the Reflective Equilibrium Hypothesis. 3. Conservation of Balance and Order in the Universe: Requalism also focuses on the conservation of balance and order in the universe, a concept based on the Law of Arrangeability. This law is founded on entropy and the conservation of balance and order in physical systems. By acknowledging this principle, Requalism encourages individuals to maintain a sense of balance and order in their own lives and to recognize the interconnectedness of all things in the universe. In turn, everything exists within a network of relationships and interconnectedness. 4. Relativity of Truth and the Presence of Error Interference: Finally, Requalism challenges the notion of absolute truth by suggesting that truth can only be established through the presence of error interference. This concept is derived from the Equivalence Error, which is another component of the Reflective Equilibrium Hypothesis. By emphasizing the relativity of truth and the importance of recognizing and understanding the relativity in errors, Requalism encourages individuals to approach knowledge and understanding with humility and open-mindedness. In summary, Requalism is a belief system that acknowledges the interconnectedness of all things in the universe, the importance of understanding identity with interests, perceptions, and values, and the idea that truth is relative and can only be established through the presence of error interference.”

Absolutely snubbed!!!

I love you schopenhauer!!!

World is cruel, Mr schopenhauer

life is suffering indeed , mr.schopenhauer

At least Hegel didn’t make the list either.

You're close enough to have nicknames for each other?

I have read the first 6 pages of the first chapter of 'Beyond Good and Evil' by Friedrich Nietzsche. I found it hard going. Ah well, I am just not an intellectual. I have the book 'The Origins of Knowledge and Imagination' by Jacob Bronowski too.

@@MikeFuller-ok6ok A lot of philosophy is in response to schools of thought that have been developing since Ancient times. They make references to problems and use terminology that has had thousands of years to evolve. Sometimes a primer text is required to understand the context of a piece of philosophy, as well as the way they're using the terms to describe things. Sometimes I think they're being intentionally impenetrable and inscrutable though. If you write confusing and sometimes say something poignant, people will spend generations working out what the hell you were trying to say. I've tried reading Kierkegaard as well as Heidegger and it's mostly nonsense to me. I hear Hegel is hard to read too. The audiobook for history of western philosophy is very good and gives a background to a lot of what these people are talking about.

@@tyleryoast8299 Having said that about Bertrand Russell though, although his 'Principia' really does explain, I believe, how 1 + 1 really is 2, I think the vast majority of people would find it highly complex. But I have never tried to read it so I don't really know.

would you recommend stoic book bro?

@@Henok-qn6nc A personal favorite of mine is "Letters from a Stoic" by Seneca

"later on JSM discarded his own utilitarianism saying it was garbage" Do you have a source for that? The Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy says he remained a utilitarian his entire life.

@@Xob_Driesestig No sorry I must be thinking of someone else. I could have sworn it was jon stuart mill who said he regretted being a utilitarian after he had seen what happened to the ussr, but jsm died before the ussr even started. My bad !! I will edit my first comment. I always filtered out utilitarians and utilitarianism from my mind, so I didn't remember the details. I only really know much about Jeremy Bentham and Peter Singer...and a couple deep ecologists.

​@@davespb6183imo Durant & Russell both miss the mark and misrepresent a lot in their books. From Durant making it more narrative to Russell's butchering of Hegel. If you want to get an introduction, get an introductory textbook. 1 person trying to write about and describe that make philosophers/philosophies is doomed to fail. Textbooks are the way to go, even if they require a bit more time to get through

I pinch myself and ask myself all the time: Are you a real person ? I kissed you so I know youre full of passion and life.

Oh damn, a private text got added here instead !!!

@@50deluxe4 Your question doesn't make any sense. Re-word it so I can understand and I might reply.

​@@50deluxe4even by Ayer himself. He stated in an interview with Magee that "Nearly all of it were false."

who is that? hahahaha

kant understand Hegel😂

atleast mention Schopenhauer

He mentioned it was largely about western philosophy if I’m not mistaken

@@Sdfghjk442,The video was supposed to be about philosophy, not just western philosophy.

@@achyuthcn2555look at minute 40 onwards. He gives the “core reading material for WESTERN philosophy” in the video

​@@Sdfghjk442the video itself is 13 minutes long.

Drop your list here, big man.

1. Kant 2. Schopenhauer 3. Hume 4. Plato 5. Mainlander 6. Cioran 7. Benatar

benatar for real? lmao 😂

Bro it's his list

​@@leonschmidt9902 Schopenhauer, Cioran, and Benatar... Are you okay, man?

spinoza einstein and schopnhauer have a great life