Top 11 Frigates In 2024 | Ultimate Ranking

Рет қаралды 362,927

Жыл бұрын

Frigates are versatile warships able to serve many different missions, including anti-ship, anti-air, and anti-submarine warfare. This video ranks the top 11 most powerful frigates in the world.
Want to support the channel?
/ eurasianavalinsight
www.buymeacoffee.com/navalins...
Keywords: Modern warships, military, defence, naval, Sachsen class, Type 054A, Mogami class, FREMM, Admiral Grigorovich class, De Zeven Provincien class, Nilgiri class, Iver Huitfeldt class, Alvaro de Bazan class, Type 26, Admiral Gorshkov class

Пікірлер: 480

@deathdrone6988 Жыл бұрын

*Americans when the type 55 is called a destroyer instead of a cruiser 🤬 *Meanwhile the British having an 8000 ton 'frigate' 🙂

@paulsteaven Жыл бұрын

They defined the Type 055s as a cruiser as it functions just like their Ticonderogas. The same logic applies to their Zumwalts, they called it a destroyer even tho it's bigger than any US cruiser.

@kqckeforyou4433 Жыл бұрын

@@raphaelgarcia6121maybe 😉

@kqckeforyou4433 Жыл бұрын

@@raphaelgarcia6121 for now its only a proposal from tkms

@Wargamer_Asian Жыл бұрын

The RF ADMIRAL GORSHKOV FRIGATE is dangerous opponents and deadliest

@IsraelMilitaryChannel Жыл бұрын

@@raphaelgarcia6121 What frigate is that?

@jack-tack3097 17 күн бұрын

This Ranking is so random. You compare a Anti-Submarine Frigate with a Anti-Air one, why is the Anti-Submarine Mogami Class at Rank 9 before the others? You cant even compare these Differend Types

@davidhammant Күн бұрын

Because it is clickbait

@golddigger8759 5 ай бұрын

Russia's Black Sea fleet is best known for its world class capability for turning into stationary and permanent submarine observatory 🎉

@thoithoibanongthombam7654 4 ай бұрын

Well you will find out that the US carrier group makes for an even bigger coral reef the moment US has any conflict with China in the South China sea.

@jamesdemarco7161 4 ай бұрын

@@thoithoibanongthombam7654You are a fool!! You have nothing to compare with a US carrier group.

@lucasrdkjr5436 19 күн бұрын

@thoithoibanongthombam7654 Maybe lose like 2. But out of the 11... Also, the difference is this. US Navy vs. Chinese Navy. And Russian Navy vs. ...

@hermosoloremalaga 11 ай бұрын

11:56 Álvaro de Bazan . Built in 2002 and nowadays still one of the Best.🇪🇸.

@claudiomannoni5557 3 ай бұрын

the Italian Fremm is the best

@user-tb8hz2io4v Жыл бұрын

I hear that the new French FDI is very interesting.

@gelinrefira Жыл бұрын

Nice... Another ranking video.

@elliekramer1466 Жыл бұрын

In 2021, The Dutch frigate "de zeven provincieen" participated in the At Sea Demonstration during the exercise Formidable shield. A first was that the frigate with the new Smart-L radar is the only European naval ship that can detected a ballistic missile outside the atmosphere while simultaneously defending the airspace.

@theseabee1173 8 ай бұрын

iam pretty sure its the only one radar that is capable to do so iam a radar technician

@tobilikebacon 5 ай бұрын

The Iver Huitfeldt has the same radar.

@Ezekiel903 5 ай бұрын

and you know were equipped this radar system? Thales, french-italian company!!

@Klamoestabator 4 ай бұрын

@@Ezekiel903 Produced by Thales Nederland, the successor company of Holland Signaalapparaten after Thales bought the last stakes owned by Phillips in 1992.

@eslSlightz Жыл бұрын

Maybe you can do a video, explaining the differences between modern day corvettes, frigates, destroyers and cruisers? 😇

@kapitankapital6580 Жыл бұрын

There's no universal standard, and it often comes down more to politics than semantics. Generally however it comes down to displacement and capability

@ParikshitBhujbal Жыл бұрын

Its basically the tonnage and therefore the associated capabilities 1 Corvettes = 1-2 tons 2 Frigates = 3-6 3 Destroyers = 6-9 4 Cruisers = 10+

@Bizzon666 Жыл бұрын

Some modern destroyers have same armament as cruisers, and some modern frigates have same armament as destroyers, so it's not so easy.. First response in this thread is pretty on spot, politics is sometimes as important as displacement and capability

@jesperlykkeberg7438 11 ай бұрын

@@ParikshitBhujbal Wrong. The classification of large surface combatants (LSC´s) as "frigates" is primarily to be determined by the ship´s endurance and independent action range: Long range ("blue water") vessels: "Frigates" (In example: Danish Iver Huitfeldt-class 6,700 tons, range: 17,000 km). Medium range (green water): "Cruisers"/"Destroyers" (US Ticonderoga-class cruiser 9,600 tons, range: 11,000 km, and: US Arleigh Burke-class destroyer, range: 8,100 km). Short range (coastal water) vessels regardless of size: "Corvettes"/"Littoral combat ships"/ (Finnish Pohjanmaa-class corvettes 4,300 tons, range: 6,500 km, and US Freedom-class littoral combat ships, range: 6,500 km). Please note that most LSC´s classified as "frigates" are in fact not true frigates at all, but should really be downgraded to mere "destroyers" due to their short range and low endurance equal to the rather obsolete and useless US Arleigh Burke-class destroyers.

@KARKOS77 Жыл бұрын

Alvaro de Bazan ,,F-110,, magnificas e impresionantes

@odalrich Жыл бұрын

karlos muñoz rodriguez Tengo entendido que la F-110 es todavía un proyecto y no hay ninguna funcionando por ahora. Esperemos que no hayan retrasos enormes como le pasó al submarino S-80. Creo que la fragata operativa más moderna de la Armada española es la F-105. Creo.

@KARKOS77 Жыл бұрын

@@odalrich no habra ningun problema el submarino creo qe solo unas 8 -9 naciones en el mundo los hacen y era hacerlo nuevo desde el principio estas ya tienen a sus hermanas las F*-100 hechas mas otra cantidad hecha para otros paises no habra problemas con ellas a no ser que el gobierno restrinja el dinero

@200NESTOR 2 ай бұрын

@@odalrichestán ya en construcción.

@odalrich 2 ай бұрын

@@200NESTOR ¿ Las F-110 están ya en construcción? Gracias, no lo sabía.

@200NESTOR 2 ай бұрын

@@odalrich concretamente dos.

@muzammilnasir1535 9 ай бұрын

Admiral gorshkov with zircon is a beast

@daniellarge9784 8 ай бұрын

In theory. In practice probably as well maintained as the Moskva and about as effective.

@definitelyfrank9341 8 ай бұрын

@@daniellarge9784Sure, bro. Man, you NAFO-bots sure are proud about sinking an under-maintained, half-century old cruiser with a less than half-decade-old cruise missile.

@KonstantinVinnichenko 2 ай бұрын

@@daniellarge9784 Do you always compare ships that are 40 years old?

@Carlos-cy4uc Ай бұрын

Nop😂😂

@FahrurRoziqin Жыл бұрын

I really like Gorshkov

@timothy1949 Жыл бұрын

I struggle to classify warships with over 5000 tons displacement "frigates"

@Laura-S196 Жыл бұрын

I agee

@bestestusername Жыл бұрын

agreed, there are some liberties taken sometimes with these things.

@dravenvea2605 Жыл бұрын

it's pointless to draw a fine line here. take japan for example. 10k ton Atago class is called by ijn a frigate.

@jcnamaasshi Жыл бұрын

@@dravenvea2605 JMSDF called it as DDG, not frigate

@kqckeforyou4433 Жыл бұрын

Jo you guys see tkms proposal for the F-127 Frigate? Just 12.000 tons and 220m long like every other frigate ^^

@Andy-yn6jl 4 ай бұрын

I'm a Brit, but how can the type 26 frigate be considered the 2nd best frigate in 2024, when it doesn't come into service until at the earliest 2026?

@player55redcrafter8 9 күн бұрын

It's heavily armed compared to others, considering the supposed weapons it's gonna have to carry. (Supersonic anti ship/land attack missiles and subsonic cruise missiles)

@benniotto Жыл бұрын

I still find it funny just how variable ship class definitions are and have been historically. I mean, destroyers have gone from being like 500 ton escort ships to 9,700 ton capital ships.

@geyasu20 10 ай бұрын

Who gonna tell him about the type 055 at 13,000 tons💀

@rightiswrongrightiswrong806 10 ай бұрын

@@geyasu20 Still smaller than the South Korean destroyer.

@IsraelMilitaryChannel Жыл бұрын

Will be interesting for you to do corvettes for your next video

@toddmitchell9172 7 ай бұрын

Very good video!!

@burung81 Жыл бұрын

type 054A is a 4000ton, while the rest are the 5500+ tons, some even as heavy as destroyers. However, the role they play is different as the 054A didnt need to be heavily armed, playing anti subs and support for the main combatant, type 052D and type 055 DDG. While to some countries, the frigates is main surface combatant and thus heavier and better armed.

@jaredevans8263 Жыл бұрын

Honestly the Type 054A is really the only frigate that plays the traditional role of a frigate via armament, tonnage, and especially price. Some of the frigates on the list are upwards to $800 million USD each, which China can nearly make a type 055 cruiser or almost two type 052D destroyers for the same price. I feel like a lot of nations are throwing money down the drain on these frigates when a little more cash can get them destroyers which are wayyyy more powerful all around

@muhammadbilal6757 Жыл бұрын

Pakistan Navy Type 05AP frogates are better equipped in all domains either we talk about radars, supersonic missile, Air defense.

@Louis-ej1lx Жыл бұрын

@@jaredevans8263 But 054A is also inferior to hunting subs than a T26. Why 'upgrade' to a destroyer when they perform different roles?

@jaredevans8263 Жыл бұрын

@Louis the T26 isn't even in service yet, and its wayyyyyy more expensive than the Type 054A for uncertain improvements in sub hunting. And if you mean the T23 frigate, the Type 054A has got all the same type of sonars as the T23 while having two more anti-sub weapons systems (4 systems total, including the Yu-8 anti-sub missile from VLS) versus only 2 for the T23. And nations upgrading to destroyers for a little extra cash makes sense from cost standpoint because destroyers are better multipurpose vessels than frigates due to more weaponry and more powerful radars. Those nations treat their frigates as multipurpose ships rather than sub hunters anyway, so why not get a destroyer instead?

@Louis-ej1lx Жыл бұрын

@Jared Evans Weapons is a very minor part of what makes a ship good at ASW 😂. Both T23 and T26 are far quieter than 054. 054 is diesel making them very noisy vessels, CODLAG and CODLOG of T23 and T26 make them amongst the quietest and T26 the quietest ASW vessel out there. The primary ASW weapon of a ship is its helicopter. The 20km odd range of ASROC and presumably the Chinese equivalent is dwarfed by the 60km+ range of a heavyweight torpedo. This will be a bigger issue for 054A especially due to its diesel propulsion. Merlin is also the best ASW helicopter in the world. The radar on 054A is reverse engineered from Russia and is inferior to Artisan. As are the sonars on 054A. Multi purpose destroyers do not really exist. All multi purpose destroyers trade off ASW. Arleigh Burkes for example are very noisy. The closest would be 2 AAW FREMMs of the MN but they trade off AAW capability. The closest ship to see it is T26 Aussie variant but they are having lots of issues with the fact that if you add a large radar on a ship that’s not an AAW vessel, top weight is going to be an issue.

@slkiller07 Жыл бұрын

admiral gorshkov class class is insane 😍😍😍😍

@mac2626 Жыл бұрын

The type 26 City class will crush you’re rusty little Gorshkov dinky toys!

@definitelyfrank9341 Жыл бұрын

@@mac2626 Ok, we'll see in 5 years time. By then Russia will have probably nearly doubled the size of their A.G. fleet.

@sweatybotfn9982 2 ай бұрын

Actually the new n1 is type 054B. Packed to the brim with everything you can find on the 055, just smaller

@Castragroup Жыл бұрын

Gorshkov is good. Super gorshkov could be a destroyer. Russia should focus most on advanced corvettes around 350 feet long and focus on large vls units. Including forgoing a main gun and possibly a hangar to maximize missle units. Also should try and make it around 100 million dollars. Imagine a navy with several hundred modern missle corvettes on par with a small destroyer.

@kqckeforyou4433 Жыл бұрын

Bro 350 feet long and forgoing a main gun and Hanger for VLS? Like why? You are more limited because of the vls and have to use expensive missiles against everything that the small caliber weapons (up to 30mm) cant defeat. Also you limit your ASW capability because without the hanger you loose your best ASW weapon. And only 100 million Dollars is Impossible because vls are quit expensive and you need modern Equipment to make the most of it. And then we cant forget that missiles cost extra 😉

@thehumus8688 Жыл бұрын

Main Gun is indespinsable you know if The ship want to dispose Naval hazard, or Naval mines. would you want to spend Missile ? so are some more "diplomatic" situation, like warning shoot.

@andrygugli1928 Жыл бұрын

The russian navy is building the ship you described, the Derzky class corvette, but it is considered by many russian experts to be a failure, being as expensive as a frigate, smaller and less seaworthy. LCS moment. What russia needs is multipurpose ships like the Steregushiy or Gremyashiy, while the missile platform role is carried out by smaller corvettes. Grigorovich is the ASW ship, while the Gorshkov is basically a small multipurpose destroyer acting as the flagship of small fleets and replacing the Sovremennys

@DoomSwarm Жыл бұрын

You are wrong. Project 22350 is one of the few really well-developed concerts in the Russian Navy, which is amazing. Therefore, she should focus on building this particular ship and reducing the number of other types in favor of unification. A helipad and hangar are also extremely necessary, since ships are blind without AWACS, and Ka-31 type AWACS helicopters will give good situational awareness + anti-submarine helicopters are always needed

@DoomSwarm Жыл бұрын

@Sterilize poor indians,muslims smaller than 1164 project, lol

@JD-dm1uj Жыл бұрын

It will be interesting to see where the Type 054B and the US FFG(X) will fall into this in the near future. IMO, the Mogami class is a bit better than its ranking. Awesome video, always love these rankings.

@accountantthe3394 Жыл бұрын

Aren't those destroyers not frigates?

@JD-dm1uj Жыл бұрын

@@accountantthe3394 No, they’re both classified as frigates, they’re some on this list that are substantially heavier than both of them.

@IsraelMilitaryChannel Жыл бұрын

Mogami class lacks vertical launch cells though

@JD-dm1uj Жыл бұрын

@@IsraelMilitaryChannel It has the US Mk-41 VLS, 16 cells.

@IsraelMilitaryChannel Жыл бұрын

@@JD-dm1uj Yes only 16

@zomgneedaname Жыл бұрын

Yes please do Destroyer rankings next!

@definitelyfrank9341 Жыл бұрын

He already did kzfaq.info/get/bejne/r95pnsukrL25fWw.html

@Phantom-bh5ru Жыл бұрын

Well we all know 055 is gonna be no 1

@muchamadramadhan3119 Жыл бұрын

Frigates taste like Destroyer. Imagine if Admiral Gorshkov bring 32 VLS Zircon 😱

@spiliarakos 5 ай бұрын

Where is the French Naval FDI ?

@hongphuc4478 Жыл бұрын

How about the Constellation class ? I think it is also a forrmidable class

@Peizxcv Жыл бұрын

It’s FREMM at #8

@johnsilver9338 Жыл бұрын

It has a more powerful radar compared to those used on Australian/UK Type 26 frigates with the exception of SPY-7 on Canadian Type 26 and SMART-L radars on other frigates. It's like having SPY-1 on Burke class destroyers but with much more versatility. In terms of VLS cells and weaponry Australian/Canadian Type 26 and US Constellation are similar so they could be tied for the same spot. Also wondering why Germany's Sachsen class is last. 🤔

@alpearson9158 Жыл бұрын

@@johnsilver9338 Sachsen class frigates will be over 20 years on their keels when either the Constellation or type 26 are seaworthy . That is the likely answer

@Ezekiel903 10 ай бұрын

@@johnsilver9338 don't worry, we will soon come back, i mean the Italian sub 212, Germany has developed it, the Italian changed a few parts, anyway, this are the best non nuclear subs. Our Government has cut every budget, from navy to army, but thanks to Russia now we will reinvest in our forces!

@usermk99 8 ай бұрын

Today's frigates have the size of destroyers. Meaning of frigates and destroyers don't matter anymore. Earlier these used to have specific role and lack other roles but today both of these types can do all roles. Today's frigates are multirole. So instead saying 8000 ship a frigate and another 7500 ton ship as destroyer, we can just say 'warships' otherwise will have to make clear distinction that a ship over 5000 ton is a destroyer.

@luigi3574 5 ай бұрын

Muy bueno tu documental, con una excelente informacion e imagenes. 👏👏👏👏👍

@prakat1082 Ай бұрын

Comprehensive presentation .👍

@volrathsstronghold3989 Жыл бұрын

After your last video I thought that the type 054B would be somewhere on top or at least mentioned. It is still in production but will probably be fielded before some other entries of this list (e.g. type 026, Nilgiri class). Why is type 054A listed but not 054B?

@cabasadefogo9533 Жыл бұрын

Probably because the type of VLS and missile load out has not been disclosed which out significantly affect the ranking. I also don't see how the type 54b would be ranked ahead of the type 26 UK frigate since it is on the same level as a type 54d destroyer.

@laohu5511 Жыл бұрын

@@cabasadefogo9533 it's the type 52D destroyer better still the 52DL destroyer. Stop dreaming type 26 would not get anywhere near the coast of China.

@paulsteaven Жыл бұрын

@@laohu5511 never heard of "freedom of navigation"?

@lawrenceng7971 Жыл бұрын

@@cabasadefogo9533 2028? By the time it was completed China would have built more and better frigates than the type 26 lol

@xinyiquan666 Жыл бұрын

@@paulsteaven yeah, but UK has no capability to maintain a patrol that far away

@eymeeraosaka2954 Жыл бұрын

Looks like a pretty level playing field to me....They are all about the same standard...? So numerical advantage is the deciding factor in a naval battle?

@EurasiaNaval Жыл бұрын

Yeah, I would probably say so, although the Zircons and supersonic missiles will give the Russian and Indian ships an edge I think

@peterasp1968 11 ай бұрын

More than numbers, it will be the quality of the ship's crews that will determine an outcome. Was so at Plataea in 479BC is so now.

@definitelyfrank9341 Жыл бұрын

Your channel is very underrated. I guess people can't cope with facts nowadays and don't watch videos that say something good (and true) about something Russian-made.

@jona.scholt4362 Жыл бұрын

Perhaps some people can't cope that Russian made equipment is extremely overhyped

@definitelyfrank9341 Жыл бұрын

@@jona.scholt4362 Eurasia Naval Insight: "Admiral Gorshkov has an excellent balance of anti-sub, air defense and offensive capabilities" how is he 'over-hyping' the ship? To me, over-hyping something is saying things like "The enemy will be shot down before they even knew the F-22 was there" "F-22 is invincible" y'know, stuff like that.

@SpruceWood-NEG 11 ай бұрын

054A is a small trawler with 42 completed vessels. For fishing efficiency, we also need 32 054B medium-sized trawlers (6200 tons). These fishing boats are toys, don't worry.

@definitelyfrank9341 11 ай бұрын

Cry harder, mate. Crying is a brilliant coping mechanism.

@musa7010 3 ай бұрын

Your assessment of Type 054 A is off the mark. I suggest you make a compative datasheet of capabilities of all the frgates except range and spead (because those are immaterial during a stand off engagement). You will find that aesa radar and supersonic missiles combined with a serious ASW capability 054 A is head and shoulders above its more expensive competiters

@nasosgr 7 ай бұрын

Belharra, don't you think it is one of the best latest generation frigates? I think it is in the top 3.

@tommykar9320 Ай бұрын

θα στο πω στα αγγλικά.....Belharra is underpowered. Not enough firepower. Yes, it has the best radar system in the world, but that is not enough...

@nasosgr Ай бұрын

@@tommykar9320 Maybe you are right, I don't know many details, what do you think of the 7 constellations that we negotiate with the states?

@tommykar9320 Ай бұрын

@@nasosgr Constellation class is not an option any more due to the big delay in its construction. Even the US Navy will get their first one early 2030s!!!! So, realistically for Greece, it would be around 2032-33 at best!!! Thus....not an option any more.

@zixinxia194 Жыл бұрын

So littoral combat ship (LCS) and corvettes are next?

@EurasiaNaval Жыл бұрын

Could do - aircraft carriers first though, possibly

@UltimaSRi 7 күн бұрын

Corvette: 1 Offensive capability (ASuW) - Frigate: 2 Offensive capabilities (ASW, ASuW) - Destroyer: 3 Offensive capabilities (AAW, ASuW, ASW/land attack [DDG] - Cruiser: 4 offensive capabilites (ASW, ASuW, AAW, land attack) This makes Arleigh Burke rather a light cruiser and most of those frigates in this video a destroyer (light)

@danlegris387 Жыл бұрын

Canada has turned their version of the type 26 into a pretty patrol ship. $6 billion each, 24 vls cells, 8000+tons but it does have a gym.

@alpearson9158 Жыл бұрын

an education beyond childish political spam might help you but I doubt it

@danlegris387 Жыл бұрын

@@alpearson9158 You sound like an Irving shareholder, so what exactly did I say that is wrong?

@jamesfriesen191 11 ай бұрын

The CSC will be far more capable than any ship the RCN has ever operated.

@danlegris387 11 ай бұрын

@@jamesfriesen191 there are more capable options out there for far less money. The US Constellation Class would cost us $1.5b ea, the FREMM frigate which the Const Class is based from, the Iver Huitfeld Class and Type 31 for around $500m ea (even the UK realized there isn't enough bang for the buck hence the Type 31), the Nilgiri Class would be around $800 mill, even a few Hobart Class ships would have been better, just a few examples

@kabouterwesley83 10 ай бұрын

@@danlegris387if I recall correctly, the italian FREMM, Spanish F100 (the original hobart class) and dutch LCF have been considered besides the type 26. In the end the british won.

@Uriel77200 Жыл бұрын

May be posting this prematurely as I have not finished the vid. Germany has an awrsome Frigate it was just too big at first to be classified as a frigate.

@definitelyfrank9341 Жыл бұрын

It's also very lightly armed.

@commodorce6431 Жыл бұрын

Is it just more or are Royal Navy ships generally slow, like 26 knots compared to other ships having 30+ knots

@definitelyfrank9341 Жыл бұрын

Honestly, most of their equipment is slower than their counter parts, such as the Challenger.

@joshuasenior4370 Жыл бұрын

They are often quite conservative with these estimates. I for one know some of the RN ships will go a fair bit faster than what is claimed.

@ioanbota9397 Жыл бұрын

Realy I like this powerful frigate

@lydioconception3470 9 ай бұрын

Wow.JMSDFs 1st built frigate now belong to top 11 frigates in the world

@MrCedric123abc 5 ай бұрын

What about the 054B you included the type 26

@catonpillow Жыл бұрын

A quick question: Do the hypersonic missiles enter supersonic mode in their terminal phase? Or they don't have to slow down before the impact?

@kqckeforyou4433 Жыл бұрын

Well the optimal doesn't have to but all that radar use would need to because if not they can't really do the job because the Plasma building around the missile interferes with the radar. This is also why the idea of plasma stealth was created.

@Mercer1012 Жыл бұрын

@@kqckeforyou4433 Plasma stealth is highly debated as actually being a thing. Additionally, the Zircon has been tested and has taken out targets, so clearly it works and if Plasma stealth is a thing, it has been overcome.

@kqckeforyou4433 Жыл бұрын

@@Mercer1012 dude there more then just Radar for guidance. And for Zirkon we dont now anything. We dont know its guidance nor if its slow down to Supersonic speed in the terminal Phase for guidance or even the whole therminal Phase

@kqckeforyou4433 Жыл бұрын

@@Mercer1012 plasma still interferes with electromagnetic Radiation which includes radio waves and in the end interferes with the radar

@kqckeforyou4433 Жыл бұрын

@@Mercer1012 also that plasma interferes with radio wave is not called plasma Stealth but a normal property of it

@tomascastillo4676 2 ай бұрын

It would have been nice to put the approximate price tag of each ship.

@mac2626 6 ай бұрын

The type 26 City class are no doubt going to be excellent warships, but at 8,000+ tons full load, they are destroyers in all but name.

@dinggongyan9084 Жыл бұрын

If you putting down type 26 on the list which won’t be in service until 2026 or later then why don’t you put 054B on the list? It’s going to service later this year

@EurasiaNaval Жыл бұрын

It's a reasonable question. We know far more about the Type 26 than the Type 054B, at least based on official information. The UK likes to show off what it will have, while China does not. So it is far easier to ascertain a ranking for the Type 26. Also, the Type 054B may well be launched this year, but it is unlikely to enter service this year - ships especially new ones need to be fitted out, moor-tested, and sea-trialled, etc.

@lloydzufelt7514 7 ай бұрын

I wish you would tell us how much each ship cost

@lucianosoaresdasilva5694 11 ай бұрын

Bom vídeo.

@eightyfiv32 Жыл бұрын

Some of these ships are basicly destroyers. This difference between destroyer and frigate is slowly becoming similar to the distinction between battleships and battlecruisers of 1930-40s that is to say: very hard to tell. Great vedio! My favorite frigates are the Spanish and British ones. Spanish one has the first ever aigius system on a frigate while the british ones are really multi-purpua-budget destroyers.

@qiyuxuan9437 Жыл бұрын

Usually the difference is anti air capability, Destroyer should have AGEIS equivalent system that can cover a very large area, while frigate only had medium range air defence system. But there are many exceptions, the frigate from Spain in this video had AGEIS system, and it actually become the Hobart class destroyer for Australia, those are almost identical ships.

@tunisiandom9318 11 ай бұрын

wait until Gorshkov-M comes out with 8000ton displacement and 100 VLS on board. All these 7000-8000 ton frigates have barely 40-50 VLS. and yes it will be still be called frigate. block 2 Gorshkov (not M) with the same 5000ton displacemnt will have 60 VLS (block 1 have 16 + 32 VLS)

@lugerun 9 ай бұрын

For the brits it seems like they have to choose between new ships or food and energy in the near future.

@ferdinandomusso8486 8 ай бұрын

It seems you forget to examine the Italian PPA class ….

@mrtheghost0078 2 ай бұрын

Gorshnkov ... Really i love it 😍

@owalay1 Жыл бұрын

8000噸護衛艦，有點大啊！可能055中國還是叫驅逐艦，以後要去更遠的地方，就會有真正的巡洋艦（20000噸？）

@AmarLee80 2 ай бұрын

What other ship in the world currently uses hypersonic anti-ship missiles? And uses them in real combat operations. Admiral Gorshkov class made all the other ships hopelessly old.

@erhancetin87 2 ай бұрын

istanbul class is missing???

@micasa6982 4 ай бұрын

Good video, but you cannot include frigates that hasn´t been build. Doesn´t make sense. I am talking about frigate type 26 ok UK.

@russellk.bonney8534 Жыл бұрын

They need be able to move beteen the Blabk sae and the North sea vis the Volga Canal system.

@adityasusantapanda 8 ай бұрын

Waiting for 17a Bravo class frigates

@SuperSoleREAPER Жыл бұрын

That Spanish Frigate looks huge

@OhFookinELL Жыл бұрын

Why the 054A and not the latest 054B ?.

@XkMeng Жыл бұрын

Because 054b has not been launched yet. 054b is not urgently needed for China, as it has some positioning conflicts with the destroyer 052 series

@TruthAndJustice1979 Жыл бұрын

Hey,we're are the French FDI frigates ??? 😯🤔😯

@tommykar9320 Ай бұрын

they are not really frigates....they are SUPER RADARS AT SEA....with little firepower.

@grangeyan3259 17 күн бұрын

@@tommykar9320BULLSHIT !

@qwilder9680 Ай бұрын

TWO 054B already joined PLA Navy, much stronger than type 26

@212thfives8 11 ай бұрын

What about the Baden-Württenberg-Class?

@EurasiaNaval 11 ай бұрын

I don't have a high opinion of it

@alvarohache5139 5 ай бұрын

You miss Spanish F-110 2925. Probably the best

@petewick8627 11 ай бұрын

I’m surprised the Canadians dont have a frigate on this list. Oh, I forgot, the ships are not seaworthy anymore and tied up at dock. Sorry, my bad

@scottmccambley764 5 ай бұрын

The T26 is the Canadian Frigate example except with a more advanced sensor suite than the Brits or Aussies and more multi mission including space based continental ABM capability

@JULIENSELLIER 4 ай бұрын

@@scottmccambley764 Not before 2030 and at what cost 5.6 BUSD .... Just crazy

@aljazair71 Жыл бұрын

sir, please talk about ASROC missiles belonging to the USA Navy.... what are the advantages and how are they applied... thank you, sir 🙏❤️

@alpearson9158 Жыл бұрын

Asroc were withdrawn from service in the 90's

@Ezekiel903 10 ай бұрын

or Otomat MK2

@phil20_20 Жыл бұрын

Missing the Constellation Class

@tommykar9320 Ай бұрын

why put a ship which will come in 2029-2030 in this countdown??

@user-yv8sr8fr1x 11 ай бұрын

สุดยอด 👍

@captjinxmarine9832 4 ай бұрын

Since the Chinese vessel has been made during the highest levels of graft how can you rate it at all. I fear for the sailors.

@panagiotisdouvris8738 7 ай бұрын

I think you forgot the BELHARRA fregate of France!!

@Jregidor1961 3 ай бұрын

Del mismo modo que se incluye a la futura fragata Inglesa en el listado y se la da el número 2, podrían incluir a la futura fragata Española, a ver que número la dan, creo que solo se debería incluir fragatas en servicio no futuras fragatas en servicio, eso no es jugar limpio

@leub01 2 ай бұрын

When you think back to WW2 the destroyers were only around 1500 tons compared to todays ships of 10,000 tons the weight of a cruiser, Belfast was only 10,400 ton.

@Harldin Жыл бұрын

This is a list of 11 Frigate classes, any claims to them being the 11 best in the world or ranked 1-11 is purely the opinion of one person.

@definitelyfrank9341 11 ай бұрын

It's an opinion that considers facts about the ships; such as AD capability, ASW capability, anti-ship capability, land-attack capability etc. etc.

@rafaelmatosmelo9307 Жыл бұрын

Con este ranking,se repite el sesgo de los británicos en las Malvinas con respecto a sus destructores hundidos.

@deniznoyan4186 26 күн бұрын

Where is the Class Istanbul?

@serkancimenli7880 3 ай бұрын

Istanbul (F 515) is an Istanbul-class frigate of the Turkish Navy.

@johnzoumpoulidis3279 3 ай бұрын

is a patato in the water

@Ghostyboi6969 2 ай бұрын

It's not good bro 💀

@Blue_Wallet 2 ай бұрын

Paolo de revel ??

@mikewant5230 11 ай бұрын

Turning radars are just like antiques.

@definitelyfrank9341 8 ай бұрын

Some.

@generasiakhirzaman 2 ай бұрын

Freget merah putih buatan Indonesia segera meluncur.. freget tercanggih di Asia tenggara buatan asli Indonesia

@fabricemartin5561 Ай бұрын

Where are the chinese type 054b ? They are deserve to be in 3rd or the 2nd place i think.

@perpetualgrin5804 Жыл бұрын

The Chinese Frigates are built with Australian iron ore😅.

@dennyliu7494 Жыл бұрын

Any ship above 6,000 tons should be classified as a destroyer, if we do, most of the ships in the video are destroyers. It is meaningless to compare apples with oranges. The British ship with a displacement of 8,00 tons and still calls it a frigate, who are they trying to fool?

@rohitb5834 Жыл бұрын

how about any ship over 7000 tons? There are a lot of genuine frigates between 5000-7000 tons that are comparable. Above 7000 tons we enter a new league.

@micupedro 7 ай бұрын

Spain is a peaceful country that will not build ships that have the name of destroying. The frigate sounds peaceful, that is why Spain will continue building frigates even if they are 14,000 tons.

@kaguyamw3070 Жыл бұрын

Where is the BRP Jose Rizal?

@H.P206 2 ай бұрын

Where is the Baden-Wüttemberg class is on number one

@marcd5196 Жыл бұрын

1. Admiral Gorhkov class - The numbers shown in the video are for the future versions of this ship. That particular version will enter service sometime in 2030. 2. Type 26 - Again another ship that will enter service in 2028. Even its weapons package isnt clear. Further at 8000 tons its a Destroyer, and should be ranked alongside other 8000 tons class ships when commissioned. 3.Alvaro de Bazan - A 20+ year old design, noway its in the Top 5. Was a great ship when commissioned and still among the better ones....should be in the Top 10...but Top 5? Nope...let alone Top 3. 4. Iver hutfield Class - Now thats a good ship, no complaints on its rank. 5. Nilgiri class - Another ship that will actually enter service in 2024, and not 2023. Great ship non the less, could be the best Frigate in the world when it enters service in 2024. So basically 3 of the Top 5 Frigates arent in service today... If i have to rank today as of 2023 , it would be 1. FREMM 2. Admiral Gorkshkov 3. Iver Hutfield 4. Ze Provicen Class 5. Sachen Class 6. Shivalik Class 7. Alvaro de Bazan Class 8.Fridtjof Nansen-class 9.Mogami Class 10. Admiral Grigorovich Class 11. Type54A

@ParikshitBhujbal Жыл бұрын

Makes sense

@AlexanderSixtyFour Жыл бұрын

yeah, this video is total nonsense

@JRR945 Жыл бұрын

Las F100 Álvaro de Bazán, van a entrar en un proceso de modernización de media vida, el presupuesto es de 400 millones de euros por fragata, lo que indica el calado de los trabajos que se van a realizar, por otra parte ya se está construyendo la primera unidad de las F110, de unas 6.000 toneladas, y enfocadas a guerra antisubmarina.

@AlexanderTch Жыл бұрын

You lie and desinform people in your anit-Russian histeria. God will punish your for fakes. Admiral Gorshkov class frigates with exactly those numbers already serve in Russian Navy. Two of them - Admiral Gorshkov and Admiral Kasatonov already serve in Russian Northern Fleet. This year another one will join Russian Navy - Admiral Golovko. In 2024 another two of them will be ready - Admiral Amelko and Admiral Chichagov. Entire program of building of those the most powerful frigates in the world will be finished in 2026. So, you just fantasize about weakness of Russia like Hitler.

@joshuasenior4370 Жыл бұрын

Generally amongst modern ships, displacement is no longer necessarily the defining factor in ship class. It’s now becoming more to do with role (at least in western navies) with Frigates being ASW focused and Destroyers being more AA focused. But I agree the type 26 shouldn’t be here because of when it goes into service. Especially when the current type 23s are still very capable and probably deserving of a top 10 ranking.

@ASTFRER36 Жыл бұрын

F100 AND HOBART CLASS ( ALVARO BAZAN) THE BEST

@davecai999 Жыл бұрын

Shouldn't Type 26 be exlcuded from the list? After all it won't enter service until at least 2028, that's a remote future.

@definitelyfrank9341 Жыл бұрын

It is already being built so it shouldn't be disqualified for *that*, but it should be disqualified for the fact that it isn't a real frigate.

@903IDFOLEY Жыл бұрын

They have units that are 90% built though so we know what their final official specs are, it's just the speed in which the RN gets their ships operational that takes forever...

@lugerun 9 ай бұрын

@@903IDFOLEY With their current economic trajectory it may be obsolete at completion

@leub01 2 ай бұрын

How can they make warship comparisons, or does somebody have all the true information about these ships and their capabilities, of course they don’t .

@Johnjohn-rr5dn 4 ай бұрын

Constellation class should be number 1

@tommykar9320 Ай бұрын

yeah...in 2030

@enginak5015 6 ай бұрын

These ships are not frigates, they are destroyers.

@tomascernak6112 Жыл бұрын

Top 11 in 2023, second place has ship, which will be, probably, commissioned 5 years after 2023 😀 At least you put Gorshkov first, but it is necessary to say, that as ship, Gorshkov itself is nothing extraordinary, it is its armament, especially antiship missiles, which make that ship superior to others, as you said. But same missiles are also on Grigrovich sooo More interesting would be 22350M, which would be enlarged, faster and more overfilled with VLSs than any other ship of that size. But someone could say, it would be more destroyer, than frigate.

@Bishal_Goswami Жыл бұрын

Where's Indian Shivalik class frigates???

@MartinDiaz-jf2cp 11 ай бұрын

Is it just me or did i understand anti ear

@sergiodesouzajunior3962 5 ай бұрын

Compro 200 navios dessa classe para a marinha do Brasil

@14_FPS Жыл бұрын

İstanbul class left the chat

@johnzoumpoulidis3279 3 ай бұрын

patato fload in the water

@kabouterwesley83 7 ай бұрын

'Ear defence'

@senolklnc9377 4 ай бұрын

Where is the tcg istanbul?? Turkish

@johnzoumpoulidis3279 3 ай бұрын

patato floading in the water

@antdte.5523 Жыл бұрын

Faltaría la fragata F-110

@oliver9971 Жыл бұрын

por el momento, ninguno de estos barcos F110 se ha construido, aún llevará tiempo.

@henryhamilton4087 10 ай бұрын

Ummm how do you rank something #1 if that thing is currently sitting on the bottom of the Black sea?

@definitelyfrank9341 8 ай бұрын

Because it ain't? Stop coping...

@tgsgardenmaintenance4627 Жыл бұрын

Have to agree, the Admiral Gorshkov class is probably the most powerful frigate afloat! The Type 26 has great potential, but our 🇬🇧 government love defence cuts! Unfortunately the Type 26 may end up being barely any better than the the Type 23's!!!

@abhinavayush967 Жыл бұрын

Dude , your ships are very good only problem is long construction time ( like our Nilgiri class )