your name is Phil Helmuth and you play against an idiot from northern Europe. your name is Phil Helmuth and honey just called you with Q-10 off.

Are you proposing to rename "Tilt" to "Phil Hellmuth?" Seems logical to me.

Oh my god I died at this comment. Underrated

Cant bluff table full of donkeys in my local game. Its all on crap shoots

Nah tired of playing 1 2 nl cash games. Table of 8 . Have pocket kings or acees raise to 50 ro 65 bucks preflop . All 8 call with bs garbage. I hit for a king or ace for set . N lose by river cuz no one folds n some donkey hit a straight or flush everytime. On a j2 or q5 bs hand

Lol

Lmfao

Dying

This should have 1k likes

Wooh, baby I’m lovin it!

Why does everyone commment this

@@tanner6184 see the ad of Daniel negreanu

Larry Underwood it’s his signature advice and Lowkey became a meme

Oh fuck off

Why the hell I find this dumb comment at every poker video? Are you stupid or what ? EVERYBODY KNOWS THAT.

😂

checks hand, okay nice A K, puts cards down. Wait what suit, checks again. Oh, sick both are spades. Both "what" are spades or was the Q a club? Fuck.

😂

😂😂😂

😂😂😂😂😂😂lol

I pre flop bingo too much...high risk high reward

I'm pretty much all 5 of those every time I play...Is that a bad thing?...I feel like its bad a thing..

u right

Playing while fucking

5 is me

tell everyone you're a terrible player.rake in the money

lol you think that´s to much? Imagine you have a 2 suited cards in your hand and the turn card makes you have a flush, you go all in against 1 only player.... only to get beaten by a straight flush... What about that time I had couple aces I was thinking of raising pre flop, suddenly the guy before me goes all in and I smile and call....he had pair of 6, I smile harder.....only to see the 6 showing in the flop..

This is literally nothing so much bad shit do happen

Think about all the people who’ve probably blown their head off after losing in poker

Yo I literally lost this exact hand earlier tonight then stumble upon this comment what are the odds

@@JICM25 hmm first story is much bigger tilter, I lost flash vs flash countless times, even with King high.. Happens. Losing with full house? Doesn't happen too often

Playing to put food on the table, unless you're a seasoned professional, sounds extremely stressful. I'm impressed you're succeeding!

@@HankTheTank23 yeah, feels like a bluff

@@jonatan01i Lmaoo

Be careful brother, hope you’re in a better situation right now 💯

Dry basement tip of the day please?

Nice reply

Well, in those situations, mark that person as a target fish, but wait until you have the cards, then go aggressive to isolate him. If he's potentially giving money away, make sure that you can get that money, and attack it when you know you have him beat for sure. A few of the other players probably saw it, too, and were waiting to get good cards to take his money. If you try it with bad cards, he'll win.

@@jonnyzuma6884 That's what I was doing at first, but that seemed to be when he'd get a hand slightly better than mine. I haven't done anything like that since. I remember one night I was getting great hands, but someone always had a better one. Straight, no good, flush, no good, full house, no good, etc. It was an interesting lesson, because the next day I was hyper sensitive and folded a full house. I correctly determined he had a better full house.

I'm slightly profitable. For me, it's the straights that seem to get me almost every time I lose what I am sure is a good hand- probably 3/4 of my lost hands are from that alone. it's like I'm blind to them. I think it's a lot to do with being dyslexic so it's a personal learning curve in a specific situation, though I am noticeably improving at seeing them and I think it'll soon be Muscle Memory, just takes practice to get past something like that- my stats are a lot better than I feel like they should be considering this weakness, once I overcome it I might just be able to fund Beer Money or a Meal or Two most Days unless I can move up in stakes- that'd be nice! Folding more often has also drastically improved my Game. I've probably got around 100 Hours myself right now. I hope you've improved your game since the comment :D

Amen to that brotha

It’s the full house for me. I have a set beat until the river pairs the board . Crush’s me every time

Story of my life. River screws me a lot.

That's the one part of poker that's just absolutely brutal, and there isn't a single god damn thing you can do about it, even if you're one of the best in the world. You can do absolutely everything right and play a perfect game, and still end up going broke in the blink of an eye if whoever you're playing against hits a miracle card on the river to save them. That's why Phil Hellmuth loses his shit so often in those bad beat/suckout situations, and while it's entertaining to watch, I also completely understand where he's coming from. He'll be playing perfectly and following every single best practice strategy, and then someone who he's never heard of before will play horribly and take absolutely insane and nonsensical risks, but still end up knocking him out of the tournament just because they got lucky on the river. I know we all love to laugh at Phil's temper tantrums, but I cannot imagine being in his place during some of those unlucky hands that would leave me tearing my hair out and never wanting to play poker again...

No joke this video is what got me to start paying closer attention to my thought processes in general. I started realizing that my mind definitely wasn't working correctly and after some therapy sessions, a few appointments with a psych, and diagnosis, I'm now finally living my best life at the age of 33.

Pedro Almeida 6. Not asking Maurie to give penalties in Cash games

Honey?!! He called a raise with Q 10

I was probably supposed to go broke.

best comment ever wp)

where do they get these cards?? I've got this hand and he gets the straight, clubs and I'm folding...😂😂 Phil hellmuth the git who keeps on giving 😂😂

u wanna trouble? Do you even know what a thumbnail is pmsl what you says is irrelevant to the original comment

I discovered an awesome collection of videos that should help you at Card Crusher Fixer

Fuck that modern yt thumbnail cancer. Generation z was a mistake.

Finally, someone said it @@quattro4468

OcarinaofTime98 hahahahaha. I like that

i dont even play yet XD

OcarinaofTime98 if youre on youtube searching poker tips prolly follows into the same realm, too bad no other way to get the information... like a book maybe? Lol trolls

Hahahahaha I was thinking the same thing right before I read this. I lost it.

OcarinaofTime98 ?

More rake is better:-)

it wouldnt be poker without the fish

Has he done that yet? And how about smaller casino tournaments, the $40 - $100 vs the $1,000 - $10,000 tournies.

Gotta keep your cool no matter what, in life and i poker. But Poker is a great tool for getting better at that. Laughter is my medecine. My inside comedian usually saves me lol and at the end of the day i love poker, so im happy just to play. win or lose, its part of the game, im blessed to be at the table. As long as i keep my cool im winning regardless.

I hope you're doing well and haven't killed yourself over a poker game. In the off chance you see this, poker isn't a career, the only people who say it is, are people who sell advice. Poker isn't a trade like plumbing or carpentry, it's gambling with malleable odds. Godspeed amigo

you shouldn’t be betting if you need 200 bucks that bad

2 am to 4 am is not grinding no matter what is going on

@@m.j.9784I agree lmfao that’s the time where everybody is considering heading out. 8pm-2am is grind time And even in the day time, where the true sharks come out, is more grinding than 2-4am..

If you think a rake of 5% is the main reason you end up a losing player, all I can say is just quit playing, cause you don't really get poker. Being a rake grinder 20 tabling the micros, low and medium limits like a madman and being pissed cause PS decided to put an end to that bs doesn't necessarily mean you get poker.

I don't play poker that much anymore cause I have to admit, it was pretty hard. Highest I got was NL200 zoom. It's just more than 5bb/100 and sometimes even 10bb/100 you're paying to the site which is huge for your winrate. I increases variance too which makes tilt more likely to occur.

It's true that it can go as high as 5bb/100 at the low limits, but what you have to understand is that this is by no means the main reason a certain player is a losing one at the end of the year. From this point of view, with all the mocking Negreanu gets from the "PS grinder pros", he is 100% right, in that the players found a way to "cheat" the system and make a living in an unnatural way. What do I mean by unnatural? Well, in a way that, while definitely not easy, was so much against the spirit of the game that the players ended up canibalizing each other for pennies and waiting the end of the month for the rakeback. Why? Simply because the system was flawed and it allowed thousands of players to be rakeback pros playing 20 tables+, effectively killing the games on a long term basis. A higher rake would indeed make it harder for such players to abuse the system, which in turn would drive a percentage of them away from this style of "playing". I'm not saying an increased rake is better for the players. In a vacuum, this is certainly false. However, in a closed system that was so easy to almost "cheat" profitably (at least at the lows and micros), it does make a difference, simply by changing the proportion of mass multitablers vs so called casuals. I am sure there would've been other ways to, but the decision of which measures to implement belongs to PS, not the players, and and the end of the day they are here for their financial benefit, not mine, nor yours and especially not for the rakeback grinders. And for their end-of-year total, what it matter is not how many pro wannabes are 20 tabling on their site, but how many new players they are bringing into the ecosystem. And a difference between 4.5% and 5% rake makes absolutely no difference for those players, because they really don't lose because of the rake. Especially since the rake at the micros was actually decreased, not increased, as it was the case from the lows upwards. So no, rake is absolutely never the main reason you (not you specifically) are a losing player. If the recent increase in rake turns a mass multitabler from a so-called winning player into a losing one, that's a sign he/she cannot rape the system anymore and needs to start playing poker, not clicking buttons.

I ain't even mocking Daniel, I don't really care about that whole discussion. It's not like someone found a cheat in the system man. The system (rake) made it harder to win at poker. Players have to try to make money in some way and by making volume and getting rakeback it was possible to make rake more bearable. Maybe with lower rake or no rake but just cash out fees, this wouldn't happen. Sure I have nothing against PS decision to increase rake, it's their bussiness. I'm just stating that because of the rake like 40% of the players are losing and then another x% breakeven and trying to grind rakeback. 2bb/100 in rake makes a massive difference. Rake increase does make more losing players man. It isn't that complex :p

+Marian If it wasn't for rake, close to 50% of players would be winners. With rake, it's probably around 10%. I don't care if you understand poker, you clearly don't understand rake.

He says you farted, Daniel

xMrBoltActionx poker is for you blood. You just need to apply your self at the table.

Poker is freaking hard, you can just make money on it if you are willing to put hours and hours practicing and learning. My personal advice: dont listen to this guy.

Why?

@@RafaelMunizYT kzfaq.info/get/bejne/bcule9WExr7QoKs.html

@@RafaelMunizYTit's not. He's joking. But if you can play in higher stakes, you're better off, because the rake percentage is less. Most states limit the rake to 5 dollars a hand. That's a lot for 1/2, but it's a lot less for 2/5, or higher.

Of course he realizes it. But people with actual self-esteem don't feel a need to reduce ideas to jargon and prove they're 'in the know'. They just explain things in the simplest possible terms.

Is online rigged??

I like Spanish

BudgeThePutcher - my buddy gave up poker because of....you guess it, rake. Rake sucks, and losers suck. Not a winning combo, pretty much.

How is a casino suppose to earn money from poker if it doesn't rake?

Mark Smeagel - it provides for a safe place to play. A fee is necessary. But the number don’t lie, the house takes $5/hand, 40 hands/hr, that’s $200 an hour. At low stake, one got to beat the players and the rake, which is $25-30/hr. That’s an income many ppl can’t afford.

No problem, we increase rake at MTTs too. People has too big ROI, and that's wrong.

That shitloaded rake is ACTUALLY better so...

That's a problem with Hold'em in general - you need to pay tight to be profitable. PLO might be more your speed if you lack the patience for that. Another option is just playing many tables at the same time.

Interesting what you say m8, I found that out for myself too... Indeed we shouldn't play for fun or against boredom! Cuz then you don't play as good, so I set for myself don't play more than 2 hours a day and seperated with hours in between... This way you can fully focus, and also I won't play later at night cuz then I'm feeling too "high"... This can be so important cuz for me it makes the difference (along with some other things) between being a winning or losing player...

paybackGP the amount the house takes per hand.

That joke . . . . . . . . Your head

I'd assume the "Not So RNG"

Trackball - Bugged poker mechanics! "Nothing I could do!" 😉

Can you imagine if DSP did play poker and got aces cracked by 72 off? He'd go nuts! Also there'd be tons of 'TIHYDP poker' videos. 😁

Personally I don't mind him in small doses. I just wish he'd take responsibility for when he makes mistakes. I don't know him in real life so I can't comment. It's hard to know what's true and what isn't.

i just clicked this video to check if he mentioned doomswitches at all

Agreed.. that's sometimes done because of tilt, but not always.. definitely on my list.. would probably demote "bad luck" to number 6 and put Poor BRM in the top 5 somewhere

was he talking about on the table.

Poor bankroll management will not lose you money by itself. It is very likely to cause you to tilt and therefore lose more, but your EV stays the same regardless if you have 100 BI or 10 BI.

Trias00 Yes, poor bankroll management alone can break you! If you are playing well and move up in stakes when the variance is working in your favour it will kill your bank roll. Because when variance is working against you, your bad luck hits you harder then your good luck at the lower stakes.

+Trias00 Poor bankroll management makes me play scared. If I'm in over my head I cannot play like a samurai and laugh in the face of death. If I was playing for my rent money I'd be terrified to play anything but AA on the button.

😎😂

lol especially global poker i’ve got a pretty good win rate live at casinos, and house games, and online but global will suck the life out of your soul lol if you have AK 6 handed assume two players have pocket pairs higher than 9s. If you flopped A108 with A10 assume they have 8s or Aces steer clear

AAHAHAHAHAAHAAH