Thanks! Indeed, Toyota really leads the pack in that regard.

Thanks, you're welcome! You don't do anything wrong with either of those two.

@@ecodriver1746 I've also picked up a lot of tips from you about ecodriving as I've been watching. Trying to maintain momentum here in the overcrowded UK is never easy, but anticipating ahead is key, I've noticed from your driving.

I was driving buses in the UK for a couple of years and the most annoying thing were the traffic lights which have a short time between green and red, here in Austria you get more notice as the green lights blink 4 times before it gets to amber.

@@ecodriver1746 That's a very intelligent solution, which would really help here, where there are too many people and too many vehicles on the road.

Thank you! C-HR is a great choice!

You're right, filling up at the gas station with such small amounts of fuel is quite unprecise in itself. ADAC (German Car Drivers Association) found out that 70+ % of BC are "very" or "rather" correct (+- 3%), the rest is up to 5% wrong. Interestingly they also say that more than half of all Cars tested (over 70) show a higher consumption on BC than in reality. My Volvo is either spot on or slightly above real consumption, but we are talking about 0,05 l/100 kms.

You're welcome! I'm sure you'll enjoy your new car. I'll register my interest in the Ignis with the dealer.

Hi Andy, how has it been driving so far? Do you enjoy driving Aygo X?

:) Thanks!

Thanks!

Well done! You seem to know how to drive this car ;)

@@ecodriver1746 the Aygo X is less efficient on paper then the 2012 Aygo which is a smaller, cheaper car with the same engine... It weighs about 800kg although in the door on my 3 door Aygo it says the weight is 695kg so not sure what the true weight is. So in theory if you tested the Aygo I can imagine you'd probably be posting a score of something like 80-90mpg since you seem to be a very efficient driver. Edit - that's actually not entirely true, from 2014 the engine was updated to have VVT-i on the exhaust ports as well as the intake ports the base engine is same (although I can imagine there's tweeks in other areas as well). Plus the recommended oil changed from 0w30 to 0w20 in 2012 and from 2014 the engine recommended 0w16 with the addition of the variable exhaust ports. I'm pretty sure the 0w20 recommendation on the 2012 model was purely the push the car under the UK emissions tax bracket though. I tried 0w20 and the oil consumption rate increased to 1.6L/5,000 miles with 0w30 the oil consumption stays around 600ml/5,000 miles.

@@ecodriver1746 just got 77.8mpg over a 435 mile tank (25.4L used). We've got allot of incentive to maximize fuel economy with fuel at £1.82 a litre here. I reckon I could've gone 600 miles on that 35L tank. I was near a fuel station though and wasn't that far off the 450 mile mark where it usually drops to 2 bars. You must be quite a good hypermiler though as I've been driving this car for 84,000 miles over 8 years and just manage to get low to mid 70s and rarely push upto 80 on a full tank during the prime summer months and sometimes it drops mid to high 60s in the winter if conditions are particularly bad here in the UK. I defrost the car in the winter using water without the engine running, two bottles, one with room temperature water (~15c) and the other around body temperature (~36c) to stage the glass heating to prevent potential damage. I wipe it off with the wipers imediately to prevent evaporative cooling and then start and go. I have wondered about fitting a hot coolant storage tank from a Prius but I'd be worried I'd mess up the cooling system xD. Seems like a better solution then a block heater though as it's always ready to be cycled into the engine even away from a mains power source.

Wow, fantastic!! Great Job, Zsolt :)

@@ecodriver1746 Thank you:)

Hi Ray, thanks. In doing so you can support the friction brakes. With modern, efficient engines, however, the braking power isn't sufficient to really brake the car, as compared to - let's say - older diesels. It's more of a "gentle" support.

Thanks, you're welcome. I hope you enjoy your Aygo :)

Can viewers please stop comparing this new 2022 model to the old (shared badge) versions…they are nothing alike and have nothing in common (other than name). The new model is 100% more refined and better in every way!

@@jmw0368 EH?

@@comicmania2008 , how has it been driving so far? Do you enjoy it?

Oops, sorry. Thanks. Rectified.

....it's a "hybrid" of a city car and SUV? ;-)

I think with my driving style CVT is more efficient.

Hi, I've done a test for my german channel already, the video will be translated to english within the next couple of weeks.

Yes, I guess so, but it would be quite an effort to keep the revs down in the way it's possible with a CVT.

Not sure about that, I've already registered my interest in Swift.

@@ecodriver1746 The lowest fuel consumption about swift kzfaq.info/get/bejne/frSmppySy6-ZoqM.html in 60km/h is 3.3 l and in 90km/h is 4.5l

Suzuki my ass! Booo

@@ecodriver1746The Swift is even cheaper than this AygoX

Oh who cares?

Named Aygo X in Sweden (EU) and not Cross like other models.

@@jmw0368 Toyota marketing department 😂