Because he is. Masters degree in bioethics is more impressive than Bill

I thought bill had an mechanical engineering degree - I guess its still is consider a bachelors of science degree - his scientist role was actually something he made up for a bit as he was perusing standup comedy

@@frankharet8865 Exactly. And if a Bachelors of Science degree makes him a scientist, then I would like the present my Bachelor of Science degree in History. ... And you're right, he's an entertainer. The scientist thing is just a bit. A bit that apparently he's started to believe. Awkward for him.

He is more of a scientist than Bill for simply being alive

A praying mantis sounds more like a scientist than Bill.

Nothing to do with race, every human is against abortion.

@@lordofhostsappreciator3075 Not every human is against abortion sadly in the black community is pretty high statistically compared to other races.

@@rooforlife I was gonna point that out too. I'd also like to point out how certain groups will cry out how XYZ lives matter, but by the numbers, the same group will commit the most abortions.

You'd have to be a transgender lesbian for them to care about your opinion.

Why does race matter ?

I'm of mostly European and American Indian Heritage, but I have some distant ancestry from India, so yeah there's that. People always want to tie it to racist white people. White people are not the only people that are pro-life, in fact I know more than one African-born Catholic priest, that has spoken out against abortion.

yeah, tons of pro-lifers in the "non-white" world. people assume because most african AMERICANS vote democrat that being non-white must mean you're pro-choice. most democrats are white, just like most republicans are white. it boggles the mind that someone could try to turn it into a racial issue. then again there is the argument that poor people "need" abortion the most and the unpleasant history of the eugenics movement which seemed to place a special emphasis on poor "people of color" (as ones who "needed" their populations reduced). that doesn't mean you're automatically a racist if you're "pro-choice" but there's that. the idea that "old white men can't tell me what to do" is silly. the democrats in government who pass pro-abortion laws are largely "old white men" too, by simple matter of statistics. a law is either just or it isn't, regardless of the race, color, gender, or whatever of the person who proposed, supported or passed it. we don't want to live in a society where we have a different set of laws for each group of people, do we? and now we have a society where we can't even agree on where those categories begin and end! so no more laws? and really it's the genetic fallacy, because a pro-choice democrat wouldn't suddenly become pro-life if the law was proposed by a woman of color, or even by another democrat, they would simply imply that person was a traitor or crazy.

@roasted pancakes this is what we call a "self-referentially incoherent argument". It proves itself wrong.

That's saying a lot because Nye is often a cringe-master.

Staycie Kirkendall ditto

@@jonathanfairchild I dont think the argument that men shouldn't give an opinion on abortion is incoherent if he were to make a 10sec video and just say that and perhaps that he dosn't have an opinion on abortion. It remains a terrible and dumb argument one could say civilians shouldnt tell soldier what to do in combat. If he wanted to go on that argument he would have said it then said here's Julia to do the rest of the video. But every other argument he makes after that statement, and every argument he made before would be rendered incoherent by that statement.

Bill Nye the brain dead guy.

Bill "I want to imprison climate deniers'" Nye

😂😂😂😂😂

u r uh...can you point me towards catholic dogma or doctrine that supports that claim?

@@mayorofbasedville7680 I'm catholic mate no need to take note of that previous comment. Just keep on educating yourself.

Liam Blumeris thanks brother!

Patrick Mosher May God, in His great Wisdom, bring us into full communion with each other again one day!

John Obeid amen brother!!!

But he has also claimed Philosophy is useless but uses bad philosophy as a substitute for science.

@@BenjaminWirtzAll sciences come from philosophy

they're literally stupid and know that society is saturated with brainwashed people who will eat their propaganda right up

Wouldn't surprise me, honestly.

He’s the best. He makes great arguments.

LOL

He wasn't always a hack. He used to do some good, once.

I have more respect for consistent Pro-Choicers or Atheists.

Doesn't infanticide happen only *AFTER* birth? How do abortion arguments apply to infanticide when it involves both the woman and her womb? Damn, pro-lifers are morons.

@@Arena1999 It's the logic used to kill the unborn can be consistent with killing infants. The only morons are the indoctrinated pro-choicers who don't realize this.

@Randy A No one is *pro-abortion*. The fact _you people_ equate allowing women to choose which act is responsible to being in favor of abortion disqualifies you from adult conversation regarding this debate. We don't just based human value on functional properties. And the debate is much deeper than rather or not the fetus has as much value as any human in any stage. We already know it varies, which is why some argue that it needs limits and oppose late-term abortion. I don't agree with Peter Singer. Many people also disagree with his justification of infanticide because the argument from the Pro-choice is always what the woman thinks is the best course, not to validate the termination of a baby.

@@tripkings547 Maybe because the logic doesn't even make sense to begin with. I argued with one who applied that to their rationale and they failed to convince me. Let's see you do better.

That's what I want to know...

Took me a couple of water breaks to get through it too. Nye's arguments are so so bad.

Yes yes that one

It’s funny when the kind of people who say that they stand up for the vulnerable and marginalized end up being the same people who support the ability to kill the vulnerable and marginalized.

@@killianmiller6107 - Yes the people who say Black Lives Matter think that black lives don't matter when they are in the womb. The people who want more gun control are concerned about violent deaths, but they don't care about most terrible violent death there is: tearing a baby apart.

@@Klee99zeno They also support Euthanasia too , then in the same breath they lament youth suicide.

Maybe one of u can give me advice my sister was telling me my 27 yr old niece who already has 3 girls is 9 weeks pregnant and she is going to have a abortion I am thinking of messaging her something like congratulating her on the baby, what should I do, without being mean ( I don't think that would help her see what she is about to do) or should I just sit back and ignore it, don't get involved. What should I do.

I’m not experienced, but I imagine it would be best to try and talk to her face to face. Remind her of all her 3 beautiful children and tell her to imagine that she never had one of them, instead that she allowed him or her to be killed in the womb. How might her children feel when they learn that their mommy took away a fourth sibling, didn’t allow him/her to even be born; they might wonder, what if it was them? I don’t know her reasoning for considering an abortion, but I imagine it is because a fourth child might be too hard to handle. Remind her that if she is really not able to support another child, she can put it up for adoption; that killing him or her is not the only way, nor is it the right way of going about it. There are probably thousands of willing partners who would adopt the baby in an instant.

Same argument. For example, just because ebola naturally occurs and kills many people, we don't permit people to deliberately spread ebola to others by saying, "Well it happens naturally anyway!"

That's the problem. Miscarriage (idk if what Nye says counts as miscarriage) is "natural," or at least unintentional. Abortion is both unnatural and intentional. It's like comparing cutting off life support to a patient who won't ever recover (with the family's permission) to a doctor stabbing the same patient in the neck. Same result, different motivations.

I think arguments regarding human biology surrounding the binarys and biological lack of evidence for transgender people miss the point. Regardless that circumstance, people have the liberty to seek being whatever gender they see themselves as, regardless of their biology. And on the topic of naturality of sexual interaction, I also see it to be irrelevant, at least for legislation. The focus should instead be by the lack of harm to others. Which means consent with full awareness of consequences for living beings (no children, no animals) and for nonliving things (people often have attractions to such things) they must be your own property (not someone elses things)

You are incredibly naieve

Someone linked it in the comments. I can't remember the name but it's in here somewhere.

just listen to the article's title and author and then google it. I just did that for the Steve Jacobs' "why does life begin" article. 🤷🏻‍♂️

@@mkmarak I still think he should. On one of his videos about abortion he puts up a graph that planned parenthood apparently puts up on there website. I believe that they have the graph but I can't find it. So when were trying to refute things it's better if it's accessible rather than him just saying who it's by. Giving a site means there's likely a backup somewhere on the internet.

A little tired from all of this, but blessed!

Brother .. regarding Luke 11:50-51 did Jesus really refer to the closed canon of hebrew scripture!!?? Like other Christians stated? But does not sound convincing to me. What about you.