Exactly, Science is a good thing and putting on an actor who goes on TV and pretends to be a scientist is embarassing.

@@randomBBL also putting an idiot who cant seem to understand anything a "fake" scientist is saying is even more embarrassing

@@randomBBL I honest to god thought you meant Tucker Carlson for a minute... Or are you pointing out that even an "actor," as you say, knows more about simple science than ya boi Tuck?

Embarrassing in a good way.

They are more transparent and honest than cnn

Of course cause the science teacher is always right and the student is always wrong

It's more like Tucker has an honest question that the "teacher" won't answer.

@@thomasmacisaac1503 Bill Nye did answer the question very well.

It's more like Tucker is the one kid who thought he was smarter than the science teacher, but he didn't do any of the homework and he failed every test, but still thinks he's smart.

@@thomasmacisaac1503 ...because the question is malformed and idiotic. I mean... "when would the next ice age have happened" was the dumbest thing I've ever heard, the look on Bill's face was priceless. It's like handing somebody a cake and then saying... "I'm skeptical that this is a cake, just a question... when would the eggs used in this cake mix have hatched?".

What is your point humans contribute to like 0000.6% of o2 in the atmosphere witch causes climate change the planet releases tons of its own green gasses on its own causes its own climate change, climate change has never been predictable the planet does it itself

I agree, bill nye is a moron

This!!!

Smh😂😂😂

Im both

Yeah, is more entertaining.

The crossfire episode withe Jon Stewart is funny too.

*rewatch

@@lamaripiazza5226 fixed.

It makes me feel worse

I want you to know that your salad fingers series scarred me. Love ya work.

You're referring to the host right?

Holy crap we have a god among us and n one realizes it.

David Firth I was thinking the same thing. This idiot needs to shit the hell up.

I do hope you are talking about Tucker. Big fan, by the way. What is most absurd is the lengths Tucker will go to in order to make sure Nye doesn’t get to finish making a point.

Lmao

It’s logic vs theory.

@@cryptic_rain8951 The theory is that there's a definitive way to know what the climate would be today if there was no carbon footprint. The logic is that humans have pushed carbon dioxide into the air and carbon dioxide warms things up a lot. You can do an experiment. Take a plastic bag and wrap it around your head. Leaving no air holes. See if you can survive for long.

Tristan Vassar how are climate scientists making up eildly dofferent statements each year?

You realise that bill nye is an *ACTOR*

He must be a Trump supporter 😂😂😂

Eminem Awol27 why so Ben Shapiro can talk about the science of selling houses that are under water

@@shockwavesyndrome6433 Or so he can make arguments that don't really matter. Or are just wrong.

Ben would completely embarrass him

@@HuyVu-lx1mf Can I get a link?

@@HuyVu-lx1mf Sorry, what's the excuse?

This is the CC for the whole thing. Thank you for taking the time to caption the entire show for us. You brave soul. (Sarcasm is present, but not aimed at you @Lucifer)

@quagmirefeels he did lol

Bill is a sellout and looking for TV attention. Tucker is supposed to fight with Bill for drama. They're both just trying to generate attention. Bill's right, that saying climate prediction is super volatile. We can barely predict the current daily weather, but we can see the skews. Determining our direct correlation to specifics in climate is actually kinda tough given so many outside factors. Even looking at historical data as well as political games show all sorts of funk that could alter our current perceived impact. TLDR; the only thing interesting going on here is that it's news drama for the sake of click baits.

@quagmirefeels yes he did lol, if humans weren’t here the climate would be changing about a 1000xs slower.

@@mr_gamer2267 no he didnt

Really stunning to watch?what is stunning is your lack of a sence of reality about climate and its change

He is not answering the question. You don't say 100%. you id1ot. you provide a reference from a per review document. you provide the name of the author and provide the real numbers not 100%. As he said already climate always changes. Our part in climate change can not be 100% or 200% stup1d asshol3 because the climate always changes 100 or 200 % would mean that we are literally responsible for climate Change in general, and without us the climate will always be the same. he is talking out of his azs. Tucker is calling him out and you are so clueless you don't even get it.

This is not a valid answer. It cannot be more than 100% in this instance.

@@bigverybadtom we’re not dealing with absolutes because we are converting math into human ecological impact, so it can very well be an unquantifiable 200%

@@AtomicAtom87 But we are. You cannot fill a glass 200%. Use your common sense.

Thats the I'm really paying attention , thinking hard and interested look. So Tucker can act like he's fair. Which we know isn't true.

Seems like it might not be a look 🤣

Stupid vs Can't Admit that They're stupid

@@arlaghdoth4434 logical vs they think they are logical*

@@arlaghdoth4434 Littearlly a scientist vs a biased person

You are wrong Bill is the only intelligence

@@blamecyrbx4942 FACTS! 🙌

HAHAHAHAHAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAa

😂😂😂😂

I hate politics, one side is a bunch of pussys and the other side doesnt believe in science. Also the pussys don't believe in biology and are disgusting.

4:32

@@Demon_Lord_Coom you need to change your nick to "I am stupid" Because I don't buy your specific theory does not mean I don't believe in science. It means I think you have a BS theory. When one side keeps claiming the science is settled and we know their numbers are bogus and somebody stands to make a great deal of money and have an unprecedented amount of power if we believe them. There is not only cause but a responsibility for skepticism.

u mean...and let bil change the subject.....

You should change your pfp, Trump mugshot commenters have a terrible reputation.

@@flamingpaxtsc lol nah, its funny to me

​@bowler7922 You changed it anyways lmao

@@Republic_Of_Soraya yeah I got too many comments about it so I changed it to a picture I took on my trip to Rome

@@bowler7922 Thank you. That’s exactly what you should’ve done.

This conversation broke my hope in humanity

@@Yupper277 you had hope before 👁👄👁

Love how he timed how long it took for the Media guy to interrupt him

This made me lose hope I didn't know I had.

Facts

He was confused at the constant deflection and refusal to answer his question. But what more could you expect from someone who is not a scientist but plays one on TV.

He gave the answer several times, even varying it in example so that maybe, just fucking maybe, Tucker could understand. What the hell else could he want? To be transported back to the 1750's so he could see it for himself?? There was no deflection. He opening answered every question no matter how awkwardly worded Tucker asked them. And it was pretty clear to see that Tucker's 'confused' look was failed actor's attempt at looking pensive.

Honestly it was great seeing my childhood DEATROY a Fox News bitch.

PinkHairedFreak ikr

Tucker is a idiot

He doesn't need Bill to make him look dumb. He does a great job on his own

It's quite interesting how people can watch the same video and yet appear to have watched 2 completely different videos.

Mr Turkey doesnt just look dumb he is dumb.

​@@s1t2e3i4n5 It happens because some people are completely ignorant of healthy,😊 constructive communication techniques. So they misinterpret what is said by both participants. Oops! Sorry I used a 12 letter word.😊

@Jim Harol imagine being dumb

@@potatotomato6094 lmao true, that’s pretty much sums up the average conservative.

@@DemMyHouser didnt have to make it political but ok

@@potatotomato6094 I mean all of those characterizations you just gave is the average conservative who thinks that all media is fake unless the president approves of it, coronavirus is a hoax because the president said so, the government is corrupt “unless it’s my political party”, a whole bunch of conspiracy theories and even conspiracy groups such as QAnon and so forth. Just because you didn’t want to attach the appropriate label to the characterizations you gave in order to seem unbiased doesn’t mean that I wouldn’t lol.

I know, right? His mouth doesn't make that shape.

Tucker keeps asking "basic questions", but doesn't even understand the basics of climate change itself. Tucker wanted to try and make Bill Nye look dumb, but he made himself look like an idiot. Nye: answers questions Tucker: I'm open-minded, you are not. Nye: 🤨 (must be that cognitive dissonance i was talking about 😏)

@@magiccoleman6764 It makes me sad that people like tucker have such a wide platform. Imagine even thinking that you could get a simple answer to a topic as complex as climate change (even though Bill did what he could to make it bite sized). Tuckers metal capacity is so small, trying to explain that would be like ramming a tree into a pencil sharpener.

Because they know they have no answers so they just shout .

Well if Nye tried to give concrete answer maybe he wouldnt get talked over

@@gondor532 he did give answers. The main point is that humans have speed up the time in which it takes for climate around the world to change. We would be in the position we are currently in in maybe another thousand years or so. But because of all the technology and fossil fuels we use, that change has come around in less than 100 years

So you were able to gather the degree which humans have caused the climate to change? I didn't hear the answer please enlighten me. 100%? we know that's just not true, so what's the real number. When I hear "humans cause climate change". My first two questions are - 1.what exactly are we doing? 2.what degree of change is that (what we are doing) having on the planet? You really can't calculate one without the other. Bill didn't come close to answering those questions. Mostly he rattled off the effect of the climate changing - everyone concedes the climate is changing. Which brings us back to the two questions. They are having a circular argument because Bill refuses to answer the question.

Fails to answer it you mean.

Obfuscation is not answering

I know, right? Nye exhibited no good faith and didn't even make an attempt to answer any questions. He undermined his own case.

Nye embarrassing himself, doesn't have a single data point. The climate would be like 1750, when humans had been impacting the environment for thousands of years with millions of people burning wood for heat?? Interesting.

@@Darling137Carlson was trying to get ån Irrelevant answer he says “what is the rate and percentage of the change” where that isn’t Documented he wanted Nye to concede the point. The point Nye was preaching was that warming is accelerating. Carlson was clearly presenting a Strawman and not even trying to Listen.

@@IGotGills It's not a straw man and it's entirely relevant when proponents of a cause make very specific claims that X is happening because of Y. Tucker asks valid questions about metrics. If X is true, then tell us the details of the cost of ignoring our fighting it

@@Darling137If Tucker was right, why did he interrupt constantly and raise his voice every time Bill tried to answer his questions? That’s what people do when they’re out of depth in an intellectual debate. I bet Tucker couldn’t pass a 7th grade science test.

Lol why does he always make that face?

sarconi11 I would guess it’s because he is trying to understand what they are saying, but that’s just my guess.

laughed out loud. thanks for this

Tucker=🤡

I wish they had a butthole emoji.

"If You Open Your Mind Too Much Your Brain Will Fall Off" ~Tim Minchin

The epitome of open-mindedness is telling other people they are not open-minded.

Really it's the other way around

@@aidannolanlogansawyer9777 that's the irony of *ucker Carlson saying that he's bragging about having an open mind after refusing evidence and cutting the guy off so he can't refute the statement on open mindedness

"Is it 74.3% human activity that causes climate change?" -Tucker Carlson That right there, shows he doesn't even know what answer he wants. That itself, doesn't even make sense.

Toori Baba quite random too. i was confused

Caught me off guard. Was getting pissed and just made me laugh real hard lol

Exactly I was just commenting to myself how fantastic the cameraman's work was. Psychology dictates that when you are losing an argument like that you have a lot of physical tells. I'm sorry Bill Nye I used to like you old boy but you're losing this argument pretty bad m

Johnny Boy not really bruh..

@@user-il5hy5tr5z and how's that?

I officially hate Tucker now, f*cking hypocrite

Tucker Carlson is right though and commie Bill is wrong. Climate threat was 100 % fake aswell. LOL

@Reid Elson It's not about opposing anyone which, by the way, is a communist thing too. Being allergic or immune to facts. That's what happens when group identity is paramount. The left are commies 2020, they even turned on their own people. Like you did. =) It's about following the truth. No lefty can do that. They are, knowingly or unknowingly, following lies and propaganda. Nothing good *ever* came from the left, at least since WW2.

@Reid Elson r/woooosh?

@Reid Elson They like make rules "based on whatever"(some kind of pretended science) without folks agreement. To get at least some agreement they spread lies..grew up inCzechochoslovakia

How's that

Except I doubt that Bill Nye himself reached out to the station to do an interview. They, most likely, reached out to him. So, if anyone is to blame for a poorly represented argument, it's the news network. However, they had an agenda to push, IE that climate change has little/nothing to do with humans and so they found someone willing to represent the argument that would fall short. Bill Nye isn't specialized in climate study. He has merely done "some" studying of it and drew conclusions. As we all do when we research something for a short period of time. The station prepared questions for Bill to answer full well knowing that he most likely would not be able to regurgitate numbers and statistical data. If anything, this showed Bill's tolerance for being lambasted in front of million of viewers and he took it in stride. It showed character.

You watched tucker carlson cry on tv but nah its Bill Nye whos stupid

if you think tucker really believes all the crap he peddles on FOX then you are just plain misguided. The same goes for any "news" anchor or host of any main stream media.

EXACTLY

did we watch the same debate. Bill Ni the appeal to authority guy said he wants to imprison people who disagree with him then when tucker questioned him he started talking about grapes.

Lmao well said.

@Mary Charge It’s the rate.

@Mary Charge 100% isn’t a rate of change.

@Mary Charge To be fair, you sound as sure as a 5 year old identifying Luxembourg in geography class. And with comparable math skills, too. Anyone who knows how to solve 1/1 wouldn’t be asking if it’s a rate or not. Edit: maybe you’ll be better at tee ball after school. At least then your random swinging might land a hit.

@Mary Charge I didn’t think you were smart enough to see your own stupidity in stating his claim, then stating he has no claim. Edit: I still don’t think your smart enough to see your flawed argument and thought process.

If someone says that about Tucker something's wrong

😆

That was just Tucker signalling that he was about to start the name calling.

U caught that too? 😅🤣🤣🤣🤣💯

Yea umm. I wonder..is he a genuine philanthropist?? Can someone make sense of that interaction. I think im right. I think he saying he loves people 🤔 or was that to make fun.

yeah one is part of the criminal democrat party

@@consciouspresence5880 the guy that actually knows what he is talking about? The mechanical engineer, the scientifically literate person?

@@drabberfrog If you didn’t see the first 10 seconds, he wants to imprison anyone who doesn’t agree with his “theory” and saying engineer though is an appeal to authority

@@consciouspresence5880 you're right, him being a mechanical engineer is an appeal to authority, and Bill has made some pretty extreme comments about people who don't think human caused climate change is real. But I do think there is a reason Bill is smarter than Tucker, it's because Bill can do a very simple, but at the same time difficult thing which Tucker cannot. Bill can recognize scientific consensus and change his views accordingly. Over 99% of climate scientists agree that humans burning fossil fuels is causing climate change. And I will appeal to their authority because they have spent their entire careers studying the earth's climate. They know what they are talking about and if you think you understand the climate better than them as a non expert then I'd read a paper written by David Dunning and Justin Kruger. And at the end of the day, these are just two men talking about climate change on TV. Bill honestly didn't do that well in the debate because I have seen him debate against intellectuals and Bill definitely stands his own against them but against the science denying village idiot? He kept falling for the logical fallacies Tucker kept throwing at him because Bill wasn't prepared for someone use dumb, illogical arguments against him because intellectuals don't do that because they know they are stupid, and as Mark Twain said "Never argue with an idiot. They will drag you down to their level and beat you with experience". And that is exactly what Tucker did when he kept asking what percentage of climate change is caused by humans because"the climate is always changing ". There's no number for something like that but Tucker knew that if he asked him a very specific question like that Bill would not know it and I'm not sure anyone actually knows it other than just saying 100%.

@@drabberfrog yes on this subject it was a verbose game of trivial semantics and no actual points were made in the debate or discussion

it’s not

best comment +1

If Only!

I am the 100th like :)

Also eat your cereal

Yeah I would too with how misinformed these people are on Fox News and those who watch it.

@You Know? It's facts

Zalaxii ...oh, I thought Bill was going to talk about multiple genders, guess he can tell me about climate change instead.

@@saltynutsman1 that's actually a misquote

Dakoda Baldur ..what’s a misquote?

Such a stupid comment. I say it's settled us humans need water to live. It IS setteled, in the sense that it is a sound conclusion.

If it's settled...why wouldn't he answer his question on "to what degree the climate would change if humans weren't a factor?" We need to know this if we have any way of preventing a future ice age or massive pole shifts. If it's settled, wouldn't the data show that? Settled, is to reach a conclusion with all the data...but where is the data? It's like a parent saying I'm right to their child so don't you dare question my authority. If climate change science is rooted in data and research... why not share the data? Yes, the earth is warming, but how can we prove that this isn't just apart of mother natures or gods design? We shouldn't be dismissive of others, it is divisive and not helpful in unifying people to come together and make positive changes.

@@_all_around_us The difference, of course, is that there is consensus in the scientific community that humans need water to live. There is no consensus on climate science, the impact of human activity and how to mitigate any impact. But maybe you're too stupid to understand that.

@@_all_around_usWater? We’re talking about the climate you twat and the rate humans are contributing to it. I bet you still wear a mask in public.

​@Megke17 Bro, he couldn't exactly pull out his phone to find the stat, do you know how long it takes for a apple tree to grow a perfectly ripe apple. No, cuz that's an obscure question that would be hard to memorize unless that was your whole career. Bill doesn't study only climate change, so he's probably not gonna know the stat of the top of his head seeing as he's done and is doing a lot of other stuff in his life

Lol

I am so sorry if you have to hear someone argue like this. If someone said “wait wait wait, slow down” to me that many times I would probably ask then if they needed me to break out the finger paints.

He probably comes at you with logic and wisdom and you're mad that you can't play victim around him

@@zparparz5620 dad destroys daughter with facts and logic headass

@@ashton803 talk like an adult or don't address me. I don't deal with ignorance.

Lmfao

FACTS!! 💯

Just like the presidential debates

@@redmosquito2173 one time biden roasted trumps response to the pandemic and called him bad a golf at the same time...madlad

Bill Nye is legitimately an actor, not a scientist. Thats a tv show to assist in indoctrinating the youth. He obviously couldnt explain one of his so called "scientific" concensus "facts". You cant just say that it is and it does. Thats not science; that is scientism otherwise known as authoritarian bs. If you cant explain your position on something without just regurgitating that its an "established fact" than you dont know your position very well and are most likely a paid actor. Of which he actually is.

@@jordyjustine he literally has degrees and is well respected in the scientific community. Try again.

STOP STOP STOP WAIT WAIT WAIT SLOW DOWN.

SOTOP SLOW DOWN SLOW DOWN YOU ARE GOING AT THE SPEED AT LIGHT

wdym the guy is speaking 400 words per second

Comic Cub , where is any climate denier? Name one.

Comic Cub , name one climate denier.

Ikr f them republicans

And Bill says, "I love you as a person more than life itself" and Tucker goes, "before the name calling begins" I mean I know toxic masculinity is his thing, but come on

I was literally about to write this, how can you expect someone to have an open and honest debate as he kept going on about when you don't even let them talk for six seconds.

Exactly. All the while tucker is shouting and Bill never raises his voice.

@Dunxan Gilpatric....my that comment about "love you more than...." was starting the conversation with dishonesty. Tucker was getting flabbergasted because Nye couldn't answer. It's simple If the climate we have now is what it is solely because of man, what should it have been EXACTLY, because if you don't know, there's no way to know that it has changed solely because of man.

Crunchy Gum It's funny, cause this is the reverse of Kellyanne Conway. Where she's asked a question and dodges around it.

Maybe thats becase he was not answering the fucking question

O-T -M He was very much answering the question.

Crunchy Gum more like Tucker: asks simple question. Bill Nye the engineer Guy: avoids and deflects. Tucker: pushes for answer Bill Nye the has no background and fails at basic science Guy: How dare you make me answer a question any grade schooler knows but I don't! Your anti science *thumps religious text that's been scientifically disproven by real scientists.*

ArgusOfNight if you call an obvious deflection and red herring response an answer.

That was my take as well. He had to dumb it down to a lower and lower school age grade level for the ranting host who can’t be patient enough to hear an entire response

Opinions. Mechanical engineer is NOT science teacher, he's TV entertainer.

@@edwarddongres7866 Mechanical engineers have to take science classes, so they would understand the basics of science. The actual engineering classes then apply the sciences they learn to build things. So I think he's fairly qualified to talk about science.

Any SPECIFICS?

@@wangstar No science class will show you the ice in the north till you actually fly over. I do often every time I fly to Thailand. Now where is the warm up again?

Bill Nye is a TV scientist, the way Telly Savalas was a TV policeman. A real scientist would have come up with graphs and other hard data and Bill Nye provided none.

Soooo.... you have no idea how the climate changes because there are a thousand factors assiciates with it, but when the 1001st factor is mankind all of a sudden you know exactly what is going to happen and why? Also: would you agree to Nyes statement at 5:10 that humans prevented a new ice age? If so, do you consider that a bad thing?

@@wurstbrot1772please do some actual research. We could estimate it pretty well, but it is impossible to predict exactly what would happen. The climate is a chaotic system (look up the double pendulum and how even a tiny difference in input can completely change how it swings, this is an example of a chaotic system). To simplify, the main changes would be due to solar cycles (11 year periods of hot and cold due to solar activity), slight changes in the earth’s orbit and a yearly fluctuations due to different weather patterns (Look up the el nino southern oscillation), also volcanic eruptions have a slight cooling effect (can see some dips in annual temp due to this, it’s quite interesting. If we extrapolate these effects (extrapolation is taking data and estimating what it would be like in the future, it’s very simple, you can look it up, children are taught it in high/middle school (uk/us I think)) they would be very small compared to the observed change over the past few decades. Just look at any graph and see the increase since the industrial revolution. The evidence is there, the evidence is clear, all you need to do is look into it. You can even look at scientific papers on the subject (use google scholar, although I’d recommend only looking at the abstract and conclusion, they use a lot of technical jargon, science and maths that is difficult for non specialists to understand. But if evidence doesn’t interest you, I ask you this. Who has more to gain from lying, Tucker, a rich right wing presenter who relies on support from his climate denying base, or scientists who are looking at evidence to try to answer a question. You seriously don’t think that if scientists found climate change wasn’t real, they wouldn’t report on it? They would. I hope you look into it. This mindset is why we have antivaxers (the autism paper had falsified data, and was produced by a conman paid to diacredit the mmr vaccine so a company could sue them. He also released his own vaccine after releasing the paper on gut disease causing autism, caused by vaccines. Watch the hbomberguy video on antivaxers if you are one, the founder of the movement was a truly evil man who even paid children at a birthday party to draw their blood (he boasted about this and it was caught on camera)). But that aside, I hope you and others like you can look into it, it’s just the future of the world at stake.

yours is probably the smartest comment. i see everyone, even "important" people just repeating what bil says and calling tucker names, when every respectable scientist would not call you evilz instead just go through the data WITH YOU! instead of saying "it's settled" when every sientific paper in the world starts and ends with "it isn't. we can't reasonably predict how the climate will evolve"

The most unscientific speaker claiming to be a science guy I have ever heard.

You misunderstood the question. It was "To what extent are humans responsible for speeding that up?" This was in regards to Bill saying the climate change rate is being sped up by humans. Bill says 100% because its true. We are 100% responsible for the INCREASE above the normal rate of climate change. As without us present, the climate would be changing at it's normal rate. He didn't claim that humans are responsible for ALL of the climate change... just the increase of the rate. That is not a factually incorrect statement. Now... does it matter? No one knows. Just because we are increasing the co2 levels doesn't inherently mean it's a problem. A lot of people view it as a problem because it's changing the "normal" behavior of the environment. But no one knows what the future will hold and change is scary.

@@ohyea456 At time stamp 3:00 “To what degree is climate change caused by human activity?” That’s a very clear question, and one which Nye refused to answer, so Tucker kept trying, until he finally said “100%, if that’s the number you’re looking for,” so no, I didn’t misunderstand the question (or questions, because he tried repeatedly to get an answer). Your understanding of the question is that Tucker is essentially asking “To what extent is human caused climate change caused by humans” and, indeed, “100%” would be a good answer to that question, but anyone can see that’s not what Tucker had in mind.

@@ewallt No, incorrect. You're cherry picking out of context to prove yourself correct. While he did ask it THAT WAY at THAT timestamp, when Bill answered 100%, it was asked in a different way. I directly quoted the question to you. You cherry picking another question, asked differently, and then using his response to ANOTHER question, is intellectually dishonest. The question you picked, is an unfair question. We could only estimate that answer and never have an accurate representation, which is why Bill didn't answer that question with a number BECUASE HE'S NOT STUPID. And no, the question/response I referred to is not "To what extent is humans caused climate change caused by humans" It is "the difference of normal climate change vs climate change that we are experiencing" Which is obviously why Bill said 100% because the only difference is human existence. Again, reference my exact quote from my previous comment. Your original comment is using an answer for a different question and Bill NEVER stated that 100% of climate change is caused my humans.

@@ohyea456 At the time stamp I mentioned, at 3 minutes, Tucker asked a very clear question “To what extent are human beings responsible for climate change.” You can look up the exact wording, but that’s the idea. Nye ducked the question. Tucker tried again. Ducked again. Tried yet again. Ducked yet again. Tried yet again, and used a slightly different wording, which someone inclined to cherry-pick might take completely out of context and answer in a non-sensical way. It’s complete nonsense to even consider for a moment that Tucker Carlson was asking “To what extent are human beings responsible for human caused climate change.” It’s ironic that you are the one accusing me of cherry picking when if any reasonable person considers the entire conversation, it’s obvious what TC is asking, which is to what extent are human being responsible to climate change. To take one given moment in time where a question could be answered technically in a non-sensical way, simply because of the way it was worded, and throw away the entire context of the entire conversation is obtuse.

Lol

I applaud this comment

Or care.

He’s not having a stroke?

Ok buddy

Lol because people refuse to answer his questions.

@@hanslander2849 how so? Tucker asks irrelevant and off topic questions, the man clearly doesn’t come prepared 😂🚮

@@hanslander2849 because his questions are just deflecting blatant facts

Dude is a moron.

@@hanslander2849 Troll?

But it is an open question for debate. To what degree does 2+2=3? Answer the question, to what degree? You are closed minded and we are out of time

😂

lmao

LMAOO

you should put that on r/rareinsults

Lol

Watch John Oliver's last week tonight about him came out yesterday

I agree, but I still love that he's not letting Bill give vague answers.😄😄 He's like if Bill knows he can explain it clearly and concisely, as Bill goes on a whole tangent about "we're not certain that ____" and humans cause this and that bad (which I'm not denying). Honestly it's awesome to be a skeptic b'coz I'll rarely be spoon fed anything. I am a skeptic about the whole humans call this and that terrible thing, b'coz while it might be true, it's immoral. For years scientists have had to come behind each other and correct something, the way the dinosaurs look have changed every 5 - 10 years almost, and at one point we didn't even know the concept of germs.😂😂😂 I take everything with the word "theory" in the name with a grain of salt. Half of the theories will be proven wrong in the next hundred years, anyway.

How is it embarrassing? They do it all the time, it's why people watch the channel. It's an engine that supports far-right opinions, and 99% of far-righters deny climate change.

False

@@Globerson fake news

You saw a different video than I did. I haven't watched Tucker much since his show on msnbc (back when it was reasonable) and while I've heard of Bill Nye, I've never heard him speak. The latter was evasive and decidedly unscientific.

You didn't watch the video. Bill didn't listen, kept cutting tucker off. And never gave any scientific info or data. Just talking points

He doesn't even know the timescale of the last glacial retreat. Nye is a hack.

tucker is no better either. Climate change and global warming are both observable phenomena and he thinks like an 8 year old here.

@@tiramisu7544 but there’s no proof that anything we do can change it

@@midnightmcguire9897 we can slow it down or at least start to build seawalls around us like the dutch are doing…

@@tiramisu7544 Yeah but Nye saying there would have been one is all BS because he doesn't know. He made it up.

he’s so petty i love it

It’s like taking us back to the T.V. show

Funny coz bill did most of the interrupting and he didn't even last a second

@@subswithoutcontentvid_at_k wym

@@subswithoutcontentvid_at_k exactly, the only difference was Tucker didn't ask Bill Nye how long it took to interrupt him, from the very beginning Nye was interrupting.

kittypie i swear I made that up tucker 😂 I was high af man when I made it. I used to do that to my lil brother when he was younger. Don’t take it the hard way tucker.

@kittypie Cry more.

Idiot

@kittypie well obviously it's wasn't that bad

I don’t get this joke.

Bill Nye never gave straight answers. That was the deal.

Tucker should have shown the clock on how quickly Nye evaded the question.

​@@Dudemon-1the clock wouldn't have stopped, so that would've been a waste of time

Okay but Bill Nye didn’t answer the question

Glenn Widick 2003 he never let him finish lmao

@@GlennWidick yeah... pipe down.

@@GlennWidick yeah he did, you're just too stupid to understand or you're not listening.

@@venomman ohhhh really I’m to stupid to understand okay tell me why global warming has been disproven 3 times in 30 years. Tell me why the Earth is actually cooling down. Don’t you ever call me stupid I’ll put you in your place in a blink of an eye

Tim Harris why couldn’t Bill Nye answer simple questions? What degree is climate change caused by human activity? Why can’t the scientist answer? Because they don’t know.

@BRO SKI You’re joking, right?

@@wq198mnr when u r such an inbred sumbfuck, you can ignore the answers and listen to the host shout over him in the middle 'WHY CANT YOU ANSWER MUH Q" and you drool and repeat it mindlessly in the comments LOL

@@wq198mnr they do know and the vast majority of overall rising tempature is caused by us.

@@wq198mnr you shouldn't be allowed to speak your opinion anymore because its hurting people with common sense brains

literally he's so close minded

Literally, even a 5th grader could understand simple climate change on earth

Watch John Oliver's last week tonight about him came out yesterday

Tucker isn't denying climate change at all! He is simply asking bill if human interaction has had any significant influence on climate change in which he bill can't seem to answer.

@@christopherclan07 you right, wikipedia says, People are responsible for climate change only for 1%.

Extremely

@star cruiser oh did you do research on reliable and informational websites and study that topic for years or did you search up "Why is global warming real" and called it a day after the first website. Seems like the 2nd one to me.

star cruiser what evidence, do you mean about climate change? and if you do ask any scientist who studies it and they will give you more than enough evidence. you can also look it up, idk how that’s so hard for you to do

@star cruiser Do you know what greenhouse gases are or the ozone layer or did you not pass eighth-grade science? It must be infuriating to people who study topics for years and get people who claim they are wrong. Especially with doctors and scientists with COVID.

Yes indeed Bill Nye clearly does not know much climate history either that or he is blatantly trying to deceive.

No need to rebut when Nye can't even state his position.

Absolutely the best moment of the video. Carlson's eyebrows raise and he grins briefly at having been slammed for his disrespect. Carlson's foundation was to gaslight and be the "reasonable" one. So when he foundered, he knew it.

@@privatename2426 improv actor amongst dozens of other things, tucker carlson is an elitist who acts like he’s working and asking questions for the people lmfao

@@privatename2426 lol says the Trump supporter.

@@privatename2426 Do *you* realize that he has a degree in mechanical engineering and studied at Cornell University and the Sibley School of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering? Not to mention his continual involvement in so many science related educational and advocacy things that I literally couldn't list them all in this comment, how is that not enough credibility for you? Plus, it's not like all of the stuff that he is saying is only his opinion and is only based on his research; he is getting his information from, I have honestly no idea how many, but a large number of sources of research that you are more than welcome to look up for yourself as well to confirm what he is saying, but considering how little bearing you put on his education I doubt that you think they are any more credible.

@Donald Ring ​ Seriously? It's a saying that a large majority of people use, except for some who are religious. They aren't saying that they know God, it's just a phrase.

Facts

Nye literally didn’t answer Tuckers actual question and the things he did say weren’t even scientifically accurate.

@@chasepotter2376 did we watch the same video?

@@chasepotter2376 yea he did

Chase Potter Reeee

They redefined gender and sex. Gender is social norms you follow based on your sex and sex is what you are born as (male/female) and what role you play in procreation.

Gender is fluid now. You can attack throwing glass bottles, M-80s and swinging sticks because you identify as a male but when someone punches back you immediately identify as a female.

Holy shit. You sir have answered the SJW question perfectly.

You have no understanding of what you're talking about. The science is clear. Your faith gives you no insight into scientific facts. And any faith at odds with facts is clearly a bogus faith.

NAh it's the RATE of chromosomes.

Haha i used to love listening to that station.

That’s so true haha

I sorted through tons of comments have have yet to find one as accurate as yours.

LMAO

Best comment ever!

Bill described nothing and gave no proof to back anything up he said.

because only humans change the climate 🤣

I guess that people working in retail and fast food not being happy-go-lucky is still a mystery to you.

No, I don't get angry at fast food and retail workers, because 1) I rarely eat fast food, and 2) they're not Tucker Carlson.

@@ben-9123 hm, don't think they are related.

Am I missing something glaringly obvious about by comment? Everyone seems to see something that I don't. All I was saying is that Tucker is the one shouting at Bill while Bill remains completely calm, making his statement deeply ironic and making him seem even more obnoxious.

@@ben-9123 Oh I'm sorry. I forfeit. Your prize will be a $5 Applebee's coupon.

Connor CWC k. Which is why bill couldn't answer a simple question. I don't blame him for interrupting

He kept trying! But he kept on getting cut off!

Connor CWC bill could not provide...wait for it...EVIDENCE

Furher Coleman Then you were clearly not paying attention. He said 100% percent at 3:34.

There is nothing to be gained from looking at percentages as your metric. Like, there is not a percentage of the changed climate that was caused by humans, it's not how it works. The more useful way of looking at it is to look at the change in rate of climate change

So what % is it?

fluton đubran if you really want to know the answer all you would need to do is look at charts that show how much sea level water has risen over the years human has existed. Same can be done for deforestation, compare levels of CO2 before and after humans existed. ofc we don’t have data that goes that far back in time but we have estimates. But it is clear that all these things that I mentions(but there’s is a lot more btw) are connected and contribute to the change in climate. It’s all common sense humans and technology contributes 100% to climate change since because we produced so much waste and pollute our ecosystem.

In short: the climate change and rate that we are experiencing now due to human activity may never have happened without that human activity. If it would have happened anyway, the rate would have been at least tens of thousands of times slower and in such a way that species and humans would have time to adapt or even reverse it.

Brian Avendano accurate.

He didn't give one answer the whole video 😂

Growing grapes isn't a statistic, hate to break it to you.

Carlson is one of the dumbest talk show hosts there ever was. He gets paid to spew lies and try and make it sound true. That’s all he’s good at. It’s sad that people believe him, Hannity, and the other nuts on Fox.

@@joshuawarrior8820 hate to break it to you but he didn't ask about statistics. he asked about the difference between the natural rate vs the rate because of human effect, nye said what would naturally have happened over ~15000 years is now happening at a rate of decades. Then he asked "what would the climate look like right now if not for humans" and nye brought up the growing grapes in britain example as well as other examples. Very simple answers to his questions that even a child could understand.

@@DeathByDegrees8 i agree with you that the situations he proposed were useful to answer the question. in all honesty, comparing the rates of temperature increase probably doesn't mean that much to the average person bc we wouldnt know what to compare it against, if you know what im saying?

@@davidhoopsfan might of been easier to establish that Yes the climate and planet (assuming there's no human activity) is always "changing" or a better word is fluctuating. Seasons come and go and tectonic plates are always slowly moving but the question of "to what degree is the climate changing" isn't something you can just answer with a percentage since there are many different things humans do and have done that effect our planet from green house gasses to pesticides to the bombing on japan... Asking this question of "to what degree?" is just means to dance around the facts and not reach the conclusion of YES the climate IS changing NEGATIVELY due to alot of things we humans do and have been doing and a single number or this single "degree" of change has no simple answer.

Well, bill never answered Carlsons question, Bill was starting to talk about a different topic. Carlson was trying to stop him before so,

@@SlimbyTheSillyGoose bill literally had to dumb it down and give him examples of it

@@SlimbyTheSillyGoose well if tucker would've let bill finish all of his responses he would've already answered the question, he is trying to explain the situation and how they got to the answer before answering the questions, like most intellectual people do, unlike other people, it is important for one to do this when explaining a topic in science

@@SlimbyTheSillyGoose Bill answered the question, he just didn't answer it the way tucker wanted.

Bill asserts cognitive dissonance is the problem and he’s correct. The comments in this thread prove it. Bill deflected questions with irrelevant bullSchiff like wine growing instead of answering it scientifically, such as what the average global temperature would be today if not for human activity. 🙄

to the public that matters, which is any rational person it does. You climate cultists can group down vote and block comment this all you want. Science, time & nature are not on your side. You're over.

Climate cultists lol

8bingbang H

+bigstrudel >says they're number 1 >bitches about mainstream media in other vids

Ignorance can be bliss, but just while it lasts. When truth finally settles in, the realization becomes a heavy burden.

Tucker : ur not a scientist. 7:44

Tucker doesn't even fact check his own reportings

@@6-dpegasus425 Tucker is amazing and you're just jealous that he spews out what REAL people are thinking lol

@@wombat5252 ... you realize you just admitted he isn't delivering the news lol. By delivering news, one should be only telling it as it is, not inserting personal opinion/agenda into the reporting. For example, he promoted a white supremacist theory that white people are INTENTIONALLY being "replaced" by immigrants, which fails to account for wage preferences of people in different socioeconomic statuses. This isn't news, it's straightup a theory that he went and promoted to all his viewers WITHOUT even backing it up with anything

@@6-dpegasus425 Tucker is not a news segment. He never said he was. This has been explicitly stated over and over again just like Maddow over at MSNBC. Don Lemon too. I despise those but I don't consider them factual news. I can't even argue the ''white supremacy'' thing because that's just hilarious. Sorry buddy....there aren't any white racists around anymore. The 1950s ended.

Learn to write a proper sentence.

Crowley ❤️❤️❤️❤️

Basically every time Fox has a guest that isn't a hardcore conservative. They will invite on everyone from doctors to economists like Richard Wolff to various scientists and Bill Nye, and then talk over them the entire time. Only to at the end go "I am right but you are wrong but I keep an open mind unlike you *supposed* experts."

Nathan Jung he’s Is a scientist he has a masters degree

@H N hwo could you compare bill nye to sean hannity

You're a dickhead

I was unsure as well, so I will like your comment instead

Dislike because it's posted by fox

@@ronaldfarber589 Like, because more people need to see it.

carlson was asking such weird questions

@@connormartin5053 Yeah. What % down to the 3rd decimal digit did humans affect climate change. Let's skip for a sec the fact that it is not a % affect, I mean what does it even mean to affect 50% on climate change if you have no baseline..., Just the fact that humans deffinatly changed the climate, and by a factor of 1000s of years should matter...

He always seems to have a confused expression on his face.

What does it mean when scientists tell us we have to contain bovine burps………when there used to be millions of buffaloe ………burping? Did killing them off save our climate? LOL, science

Haha it's basically watching two people you admire get into a fight...

Droiz I know that feeling but I don’t admire Tucker in the slightest.

@@iLOVEnsnpeace Tucker is a great guy but we can agree to disagree then

Some Noodlesticks fair

@@iLOVEnsnpeace Yeah but we all have our own opinions.

Shouldn't you be glad they were wrong?

No. Tucker is saying you can’t know definitively what the weather would be like if humans werent affecting the climate. While you can predict and reasonably assume what the climate would be like without human interference, you cant be definitively sure.

@@Poopopotamusgaming we actually can, because if we couldn’t we also wouldn’t have been able to figure out that ice ages happened in the extreme past

@@crimson2209 Yeah because thats something that actually happened. We cant know what would have happened if it hasnt happened.

@@Poopopotamusgaming no we didn’t actually have records of it happening, so we had to use fossil records to notice dips in populations and judging off of the patterns, it’s actually really easy to predict when it would’ve happened if there were no human intervention

Yes you can, that’s like saying if I throw a apple off a roof you can’t be 100% sure it will break, it will almost every time but there’s always a tiny tiny little chance it won’t,