The defendant is strange.

@@justicierodelaliga Both are...But the defendant is in the wrong...If I was living with these 2 I would be afraid of cameras...Sounds like both wanted the female and other males were a challenge...But...yeah...both are weird...And the defendant is the worst and needs to pay

the female was most likely long gone by the time this case went to court . most people who rent rooms in general only stay for just a few months . but i will say that ALL of them were not 100 percent honest , not even the female because she had to take the side of the homeowner or she would have been kicked out too . and i think what most likely happened is that both the defendant and the plaintiff were somewhat attracted to to female and the defendant wanted to kick the plaintiff out to get rid of the competition . she lied to the cops so she would not get kicked out of the house at that time . i base all this on my personal experience with the type of people who usually rent rooms and rent rooms out .

This.

The female tenant did leave. She had 7 cats (!), and found it unsuitable to live with this maniac. Please get it out of your head that there was anything going on between me and her. There was not. I advised this a**hole against bringing in a female, but he did so anyway. Bottom line, I was never attracted to her, and his sexual accusations are a low blow.

You would be correct.

Right.. so many people think that those in positions of power are suddenly robots, who only care about the job, and how well they’re performing. But in reality, they are regular people with insecurities, anger issues, lack of impulse control, and abusive (and sometimes even sadism) traits.

He just did the first one when I ready your comment... 😂😂 I can't 😅

He had the defendant's voice & speech pattern spot on...the first time the defendant spoke I was 😂😂

Ya think? 🤔😂

they both wanted that female , so they did the bar fight thing .

what i dont get is that philly has ALOT of single available females so why these two guys felt the need to fight over this one female is puzzling . she must have been far above average in looks .

@@marleonetti7 As if a normal person would venture out in searching for a female, when dear lord sends one right next door!! c'mon .

Yeah...I don't believe anyone who says they called out and opened the door within a few seconds and someone was at the door immediately with weapon in hand at 3am...Just not believable...And at the very least...You don't open their door even if they said what? or Yeah?...It stays closed until they open it...

renting a room in someone else's home is DANGEROUS . i would rather live alone in a car or a tent before living in a stranger's house .

Yeah, he definitely walked in without being invited

Not sure which episode you watched, but we don't know for sure if the defendant lied. It's highly suspicious the WAY he told his tale to the police officer, but that doesn't mean his tale was factual inaccurate. 🤷 Suspicious indeed, but not definitive.

i dont think he lied about the pocket knife because the handle of a pocket knife would break a facial orbital bone alot easier than just a fist unless its done by a professional fighter . but having said that , this was mutual combat and i believe they were fighting over the female , they BOTH wanted her .

@@al5945 the picture of his facial injury convinced me that the handle of a pocket knife was used , because a naked fist cannot easily cause that type of major facial injury just from one or two punches from a guy who is not a pro fighter .

Right, they act like drinking is so less offensive then smoking weed. The most nasty people I’ve ever met were drunks 😳

I don't think the weed is offensive or that she acted like a prude about it. It isn't legal in PA so she couldn't rule on the bong.

@@bethcarico7549 Maybe 🤔

😂😂😂😂 That’s what I said. You don’t go to “prison” for three or four days.😂😂😂

well the judge should have corrected him , prison terms must be for at least one year or more , the judge knew that .

Thankfully it wasn’t more. I was a grad student at the time and somehow managed not to miss class! But seriously: yes it was a prison (Eastern State Penitentiary). They didn’t tell me how long I’d be in there; it could have been a month (i.e. until the trial). I wasn’t sure whether or not, nor when, I would be getting bailed. I was suffering physically and mentally for them not giving me my pills. Can still remember the moment I received news that I’d been bailed. Never in my entire life had I felt more grateful for the comfort of basic freedom.

Eye contact doesn’t mean anything

People will lie and stare straight at you. You are thinking of how to catch lying children. Adults don't always follow those guidelines. I have autism and I can't look in people's eyes without panicking. It has NOTHING to do with my truthful intentions. It's a neurodivergent thing.

the lanlord wanted that female , so he picked a fight with the other guy in the house , had all the same ingredients as every bar fight i know of .

IMO...When people destroy items on purpose...You should get what it costs to replace the item...Doesn't matter if it is 50 years old...If it takes 1000 to replace it then that is what they should get. Some items are more expensive simply because they are older...Really old computers and such which are essentially paperweights now...Sell for a lot of money for nostalgia...

The landlord and Defendant are the same person in this case.

Me too. I have very high pain tolerance. When I’m prescribed pain pills, I rarely take them

I found it very suspicious because an orbital fracture is very painful. Part of your face is broken. That’s what I took away from that. What I don’t understand is why she didn’t ask him for medical records. That would have been his proof right there.

Not to mention the majority of doctors have not been prescribing pain medicine since 2019 when the "Opiate" epidemic propaganda started being pushed. There is no doubt that there was an epidemic, but it was illicit Fentanyl and Oxycontin being shipped in from China, across the southern border with illegal immigrants (which were drug mules posing as asylees), and the Canadian border. Not to mention through several ports of call. Many individuals suffer from chronic conditions that induce chronic pain, and they are left without any solution to their predicaments while many doctors are in prison, stripped of their licenses all for taking care of their patients legally and medically appropriately. I agree that the matter of whether or not he was prescribed a painkiller has very little bearing on whether or not the damage was done since prescribing painkillers is not necessarily the first mode of treatment being given nowadays.

If that type of damage was done as he says, he would have been prescribed a very strong pain killer. Tylenol wouldn't do anything if he really had a fractured orbital bone and all that other stuff he said. He didn't even need stitches. So I think she asked that because if that type of damage really occurred, he would have been on more then just Tylenol. Also, here they do give pain meds after you give birth. They give them to you while you're in the hospital and send you home with some. They do give the lowest dose and low quantity unless you have a C-section.

​@Kat-bu3bn She didn't ask for his evidence of medical records because it was a moot point - the statute of limitations had already expired before he filed his counterclaim. I also think she's seen/heard cases in her career with orbital fractures & has been told by experts how painful it is & what painkiller is typically prescribed.

😂😂😂

I've seen cases where they know each other, and so much goes wrong, too😅. It's just fair to say it's not easy living with other people.

If i had to choose- i would choode man to live with. 😂 but I would make sure i know the guy who would jump at me or something. 😬 But to live with random strange man, or woman-no.

living with strangers is usually DANGEROUS . but the only way to avoid the more risky roommate scenarios is to only rent a room in the high income areas , which means u will pay alot more for the room but the quality of the roommates and landlord will be much much better .

I totally understand! But it’s better than another alternative, which is “having a disease.” Makes it sound contagious, when neither visual impairment nor epilepsy fall under that category. Best is “I have a disability,” but I 100% agree with you, to hear her say “differently abled” was super annoying. Best of luck~

Where did you get that? It’s ridiculous!

To prison. I was charged with Aggravated Assault I, which is a first degree felony.

especially if it has a pocket knife handle in the fist .

You are correct.

Gay jokes are played out. No one is laughing at your "joke". Just at you.

@@TopherGrant and it makes it when actual gay men (such as myself, I'm Black and gay) have issues, we're just a damn joke, or laughed at like clowns. These are very much two straight guys going through a dispute in which we will never know the full story.

Fruit being the operative word 🤣🤣🤣🤣

​@JC-cm9bn how so? They didn't seem gay. Is that still comedy to you?

Maybe he's in an extended stay hotel, maybe he just moved in, maybe he's a minimalist, maybe he doesn't cook. Especially if it's just him living there im not sure what you expect

I keep my counters clear and clean, too. That's what cabinets are for. Not everyone likes a filthy, cluttered kitchen. Some of us are clean and don't like to live in filth

​@ZovaBe $1000 says her house is filthy with dirty dishes, cigarette butts on coke cans, and dirty laundry all over the floor, and dog crap in the babies room.

I disagree. He appears very upset not unhinged.

I am no physician but as a woman the plaintiff gives me weird vibes too.

He apparently has a seizure disorder and is on meds. He seems to communicate the same way my son does (epilepsy) when he feels stressed or nervous.

Geez. Sounds like you were in the bottom 2 of your medical school. Where do you practice? I wanna make sure I avoid that place. I'm also a neurodivergent. Sad to see "doctors' still using antiquated terms and practices. Do better

@@TopherGrant I'm Autistic as well (in addition to being Black and gay as I revealed before) and you're being awfully defensive to the Plaintiff, like to me both guys there are holes in their story smh lol (BTW Plaintiff looks familiar like I seen him on a PC case before, really starting to think these are all fake ooh girl lol)

No, it is you.

That doesn't make any sense. No one considers "pot" a drug except squares and old cops. No more a drug than cigs or coffee.

Only in children. Adults don't generally follow those guidelines. Many, many neurodivergent people can't look in people's eyes. Like me. An adult will stare right into your eyes and lie.

And how do you plan to "force" them out? You CANNOT touch them or their property. You HAVE to go through the courts to evict a squatter. It's not as easy as you think. You can't even threaten them without breaking the law and hurting your case.

It’s simple LOCK THEM OUT. I don’t have to go to court prior to moving them out if I choose to disobey the law just like the crazy leech squatter. What I may have to do is pay the consequences in court there after. If they don’t HAVE to leave. I DONT HAVE to let them stay. IF YOU choose to be a landlord victim that’s on you. But “respecting” the law that has no qualms about giving away MY rights AND property while waiting on the uncaring courts. No, I DON’T HAVE to do THAT. Just like this guy didn’t. Now he lives free of the crazy. Landlord WIN.

He's a troll, I've seen other posts from this name.

@@krystalroller2915 and a darn good one.

@@rayannesheahan7908 what are you gonna do when they break in and squat? You don't really think a professional lowlife would let a deadbolt stop them!? Don't be so simple minded

Yes, another tenant case. Yes, another dog bite case. Yes, another car crash case. There are other judges to watch if you don't like it.

@@ggboot1 You forgot 'another used car sales case" It's small claims court............. pretty limited. But there are ones where fraud is involved and those are great.

Actually the plaintiff won the case

I’m sorry you weren’t able to play the race card in this episode. JM as usual, handled this quite well.

It’s also “they’re” not “their”.

Lol Adrian. You can't complain about racism in this one, so you have to find something to get annoyed at. She doesn't need to hear the entire song and dance to work out the legal points.

For a person who always has something negative to say about JM, you sure do make sure to watch and comment on every episode so you endorse her paycheck lmao

She probably read their court papers and any declarations, police reports, pictures, proofs, etc so she just needed to ask questions for clarifications. She would have them re-state the “fight” or “eviction” to see if they mess up in their stories or whether she believes the Plaintiff or Defendant more than the other. But it does get annoying because as viewers we see it as the parties are always getting “cut off” and we don’t get the whole story because we never read the entire case like the Judge probably did or has access to. But I’m sure if they showed everything, the show would end up with a Part 2, 3, 4 etc and that’s too long for a court case TV. lol