Sky acting like this isnt a cash grab.

So it wasn't the people asking it was TV companies. Go figure

I'm totally against this.

Makes mockery of justice letting camera in,reminds me of tv judge rinder

The bloke who used to draw them will be out of a job then.

No not good idea

Is this really needed? I think not

not every inch of our lives need to be captured on camera... everything is not entertainment

How will the judges stitch people up now?

terrible idea. yet another one

Who is paying for the equipment/running costs? This seems like a wasteful vanity project.

If it is the general right of the people (subject to the capacity of the courtroom) to be able to attend and witness the open proceedings of a court, then it should follow that the people should have the right to witness those proceedings by live or recorded television. Simple as, in my view.

So, a TV programme called Crown Court, eh? Damn, that was a long time ago . . .

It's a good thing, it good be a deterrent to stop others committing the most horrible crimes.

SO WE CAN SEE HOW CORRUPT THEY ARE ON TV MMMMMMM

when he says "several years ago" and then it says 2019 haha

Hope it will cover the so so many "rape gangs"... if they come to court.

TV Cameras is huge and bulky why would not use a PTZ Camera because PTZ Cameras are small and compact and need only a one operator to control the all the cameras

It be fun to Watch if it happens watching the criminals getting carted away do no why people are saying this shouldn’t be on TV but yet it’s no different then going to watch it at the court lol

That last woman to be hung! Was innocent

Why cant the full trial be recorded from start to end if there is any chance of a person getting a prison sentence because it doesnt cost much to record stuff and store it. Its extremely important if someone is innocent for them to be able to make a successful appeal. Why waste money allow courts to show selected parts because if someone is innocent and is wrongly vilified its wrong. Wrongful convictions dont just affect the person sentenced it affect the families, the community and countries faith in justice and the victim doesn't get justice. Its a matter of time before someone innocent sentencing is broadcasted vilify that innocent person and then it later comes out they where innocent. People will lose what little faith they have in the justice system

Embracing technology? Welcome to the XXI century.

How much did sky pay for this.

👍 Keep up the transparency

All this is going to do show the judge nothing like American, so doesn't make much difference here, waste of time 😅😅

This is remarkable news.

Oh no, this is bad, not more technology, and people trying to play god!!! 😪🤦🏿‍♂️🕵🏿‍♀️

ধন্যবাদ।

Good idea

So if someone is wrongly convicted. They gonna have no chance of appeal because parts of the trial will be cherry picked to make the person appear guilty. Either record the full trial and allow full access to the footage to those autherorised. This aint about transpancy this is just a change because less people have faith in the justice system. By allowing cameras to only part of the trial is wrong because it never shows the full picture and kills any chance of the person making successsful appeal if they innocent. If someone is innocent and are found guilty but because the sentancing was broadcasted if evidence later comes out that person wrongly convicted the chanced of the person successfully appealing are zero because it will kill any faith people have in the courts and media no trial that is broadcasted even if the person is innocent will that person ever get a successfull appeal.

Welp right now on march 16 the murdee of sarah is coming

I agree with it

Time to get famous!!

Awesome