15 hrs ago, this confirms super natural force is real.

id like to add that most believers are true negative believers and have no clue if what they believe actaully makes sense. this is because most religions use blind faith and non of them actaully make sense if you delve into them unlike something like math where you delve into it and it all makes sense it is all real religions though contradict themselves time and time again, they also change and sure math changes but the religions fundamently change and the religion is always preaching about how it currently is all knowing while math doesnt state its complete that it is all knowing maybe eventually but theres still things to discover about math or physics or other sciences and religion has only new made up stuff to add nothing real nothing tested just a bunch of small changes that people think is right when the original could be taken in many different ways and we are only left with a bunch of different interpertations no religions are the original of even themselves they have all changed way past what they started as and to believe in them would be insane. thank you. if you actaully study something like the bible or you study a religion you will end up lieing to yourself or end up being an athiest just saying but true athiests the ones that are negative and have thought about religion for real are in a lot of ways smarter then everyone in religion who still lies to themselves that god is real :|

You wrote a PhD thesis based on a "personality theory" that is widely regarded by professional psychologists as 1920s quackery?

@@WeMayBeFarApart I will address that concern in part 2.

I don't believe in atheists. I don't think they exist. I am neither realist nor idealist, I am a real enoughist.

Yes, and most atheists are not humanists (atleast I don't think so), many atheists still believe in things like life after death, spiritual energies, the power of rocks, astology... AS you said the sample he got is not representative

I'm almost certain this is something he and his supervisors would have been aware of and would have discussed in the chapter about methodology.

Plus, he stated that he was interested in Explicit Atheists - which are those that have considered their position. This is likely true of most of those participating in Atheist discussion/debate forums so that would be capturing the exact people being sought. It's also worthwhile stopping for a moment and remembering that these conclusions are about Explicit Atheists and would not necessarily hold true of Implicit Atheists.

@@Catfive1975 Most explicit atheists won't talk about their lack of faith in public. Those who will are militant explicit atheists, often humanists and skeptics.

What Matt Baker conducted was known as a convenience survey, as opposed to a probability survey typically used in opinion surveys. Note that in the brief display of his survey results (toward the end of the video) he did not report any margin of errors or plus/minus numbers, which must always be reported for probability surveys but cannot be reported in convenience surveys. Note: I did notice that he had some "p" numbers at the bottom (e.g., p < .05, p < .01, etc.) but I'm not quite sure what those numbers were were in relation to but they definitely weren't margin of errors. What this means is that, while of some interest and value, the results and findings of his survey cannot be applied to the atheist community at large. IOW, one can only say that such-and-such percentage of the survey respondents held such-and-such belief, not that any certain percentage of all atheists (or theists) in the general population hold that belief. However, that being said, a most interesting and informative presentation.

unless there was only one copy

@@scambammer6102 Now that’s just petty.

Even my mother wouldn’t read let alone buy my thesis.

@@alechorn1109 Just curious, what was your topic?

Watch Dr Haitham Talaat videos,for your own good.

Haha burn in hell

Amazing what we can achieve when we're not at each other's throat, which is unfortunately often the case, for both theists and atheists. I think a theology discution between Matt and someone like genetically modified skeptic would be amazing. we'd all get a lot of knowledge we didn't have before.

Being Godforsaken is not good

@@Reichsritter how is it godforsaken when you don't believe in it? are you Jupiterforsaken? what about Odinforsaken?

@@josephguillerey4391 no

This video also made me think about where I stand as well. I grew up Christian, but I've become more distant simply because of things I don't agree with, particularly since I've come to identify as queer. People tend to make this decision out of a man's free will a moral question. I still remember when my mom was listening to this homily, and the priest basically said "to not agree or believe is just an excuse to sin."

I remember being immensely shocked when I learnt that some people from a Western country, like the US, could think that not believing in a god was linked to not being moral. As a French agnostic atheist who grew up without any religious or anti-religious pressure, but with strong moral values, it was a hard awakening.

@@GeneralYen as an Indian i agree

Well said, James!!

What's more insulting is the reductive approach to the role religion (and in particular organized) has had in creating a framework for societal order, international cooperation, law, philanthropy and including the disenfranchised. Warts and all, and there are LOTS, Organized Religion has done more good than bad especially because of the institutions it has put in place. I'm a thorough atheist but I don't have the philosophically vapid takes of a rebellious high schooler smoking some schwagg from a soda can.

We will happily discuss the topic with those of you who choose to be atheist without bashing religion. While no longer belonging to any particular faith, I still believe in God, but at the same time I can respect your beliefs (or disbelief as the case may be)

@@farpointgamingdirectWhile I have no particular desire to get into a heated debate with a theist over religion, I do object to the idea that any criticism of religion, or religious ideology is taboo. Someone else may criticize my political ideology, even my rejection of religion, but, oooh…. if I utter the slightest criticism of religion, *that* is beyond the pale. *Why?* Humanity progresses through an honest exchange of ideas and viewpoints, and by subjecting long-held beliefs -political, scientific, sociological, philosophical- *to scrutiny.* If those ideas fail to hold up to scrutiny, then perhaps they *need* to be reconsidered. And a thoughtful, compassionate person can present such an argument without condescension or ridicule of those holding the belief that they’re challenging. I can respect *you* and still think that your beliefs are unfounded, illogical, even silly. And FYI: many people don’t *choose* to be atheists, they simply *are.* I didn’t *choose* to not believe in forest elves, either, I simply never saw any reason *to* believe in them. If at some point in the future I see compelling evidence of the existence of god(s), or forest elves, then I’ll change my mind. If I really *tried* to believe [in fact, I *have* tried], I would still be unable to. Belief without evidence is something I simply can’t understand.

@@altitudeiseverything3163 The debate has been messed up by militants on both sides of the divide. As a non stipendiary Priest, open to debate, I can assure you that I find Christian bigots every bit as irritating as Atheist ones.

I'm from (NW) Europe, and the OPs comment feels so alien to me. Here atheism is more or less the norm. (Well, not in a normative way necessarily, but it is the most common position, I mean).

@@farpointgamingdirect I'm not interested in demeaning or bashing anyone's religious beliefs. But "religion" is not so much a self-contained social concept as it is an interconnected machinery of social dependencies, e.g. religious doctrine, religious organizations, laypeople, religious culture, etc. For this reason, I the idea of "bashing religion" is a bit of linguistic confusion. People who criticize religion are in most cases criticizing one of those things, so a precondition for a productive conversation would be that the interlocutor is also aware of this. Unfortunately, many are not.

This reminds me so much of my own journey but I started on the Abrahamic side (roman catholic) and I had a "spiritual dream" , after which i had to look in some eastern religions just to "proof" to myself that thinks like reincarnations are not real, because they where not a part of my religion. In the end I just noticed the lack of proof I had for so much stuff I firmly believed in.

@@dunklerKurfurstDesDeepstat comparative analysis and retrospection, that's the key! 😊 Thank you for sharing.

👎🏻😒

​@@direct.skc.2 UNESCO recognizes the tradition of Vedic chanting as an *_Intangible Cultural Heritage of Humanity._* It's a tradition that has survived for over 3,500 years. But today, sadly - to quote from UNESCO - _"only thirteen of the over one thousand Vedic recitation branches have survived. Moreover, four noted schools - in Maharashtra (central India), Kerala and Karnataka (southern India) and Orissa (eastern India) - are considered under imminent threat."_ To be clear, I'm not criticizing your personal spiritual journey. Your path is your choice, and yours alone; I have no say in it. I was just pointing out the tragedy that whenever we invent something new-like computers and the Internet-we inevitably end up killing off earlier traditions-like memorizing and handwriting. And then we lament the dying traditions. But, I suppose, that's progress.

@@nHans Yes, change is the only constant! The whole Universe changes every moment and doesn't remain the same even for 2 consecutive seconds!

Same. I've sort of shifted around most of these categories one time or another going from a more hard atheism when I gave up religionor explicit to soft one now years later. Seen all sorts pf people everywhere on the chart here as well.

Atheism is shit. There's nothing good about it. To turn from evil Islam to atheism is just going from Satan's right hand to his left.

@@yenyehski_698 Strange. I've gone harder. It really doesn't make sense. I'm very precise. If a religious person wants to make their case, they better replicate a miracle or two for my personal delight. I don't ask their Yahweh to do something that it hasn't been credited with before. None of this "look at the trees" bs because Muslims have told me this, Hindus have told me this and of course, Christians have told me this. They can't all be right, but they can all be wrong. With the Trump era, it's shifted to extreme concern. Now, I'm of the position that religion - all religions - should be classified as an "adult only activity" and that children must be protected from these nonsense beliefs. Look, if their religion is true, as they claim it is, than an adult would easily believe. It wouldn't take much time at all to believe something such as existence. Why indoctrinate on an immature brain with few defenses against lies and fewer life experiences so they can't recognize the lie? I mean.. talking snakes? What are we? In Harry Potter land? The reason for this is... magical thinking. These believers have been taught a very bad technique to assess reality. It's based on belief rather than some form of evidence + reasoning. It's like improper lifting techniques where you don't "bend from the knees" but rather "bend from your poor little spine". You're going to get hurt eventually. You can't just perform magic spells and claim that our god will fix things like climate change or protect oneself from a global airborne respiratory disease that turns lungs into well...something not breathable.

@@jenniferhunter4074 Yeah I get what you mean. I've read a lot of the bible, bit of the quran, and attended six year of scripture and I still go to Christian groups if they present themselves (like I said I'm not religious, I just go when friends want to go and I find it mildly interesting). On top of this my background is full of religious fanatics so I'm pretty well accustomed to religion. Must say I agree about how I don't believe in the creation and history stuff in religion, it just doesn't make sense (to me) in a contemporary context. However saying this I find on a personal level the spiritual stuff speaks to me about the human condition. I also like the charity and acceptance in religion, though I believe many 'religious people' ignore this as they don't read the their own scripture. Instead they focus on one line of the Leviticus about two men sleeping with eachother instead of the ten commandments about loving thy neighbour. They preach hate out of a book of love, mind you not all scripture is so friendly. In the end whatever religious stance people take I'll leave them to it so long as they don't hurt others or force it. As it says in the quran to say to nonbelievers I do not believe what you believe, and you do not believe what I believe. I know my beliefs sound weird to others but personally I take no offense to it. I respect anyone's beliefs so long as they are good about it.

@@yenyehski_698 For me, I'm far more materialist. I distrust the wanting because it can be so easy to manipulate someone by their desires. What I want does not mean that it is real or that it is good. I value the real. I'm not sure I accept the "spiritual connection" via religion. It's something that is often said much like they claim that the US is the greatest country in the world. I have doubts about such grandiose claims. I think what is implied is that you can have a " human connection" with another. Well, I've formed that "human connection" in a crowded bus full of strangers and it's a situation where, if you don't laugh, you're going to cry. We'll naturally form these connections if we participate and we're not weird. I find real historical figures to be more inspiring than the fictional ones. Even in the muck of their lives, I see something worthy of emulation. Sure. They are products of their time and they weren't that nice in every way. But then, are any of us that saint-like? There's a realness to their struggle. They're human or they were human. I'm human. I may not be able to fly but I can strive to emulate the best of humanity. Even if I fail, at least I tried. For religion, it's difficult to separate the good from the bad. I have seen nice people transform into monsters and their religion was still the same religion. They just chose to emphasize the darkest parts of their religion. And that is the most dangerous aspect of religion. With religion, there is no limiting factor to how far you will go. There will always be an interpretation for what you want. Love can be twisted into acts of hatred. You'll say "It's for their own good" ... but is it? At it's worst, religion fosters a sense of narcissism. At it's mildest, it's still present like this little evil cancerous cell. It just needs the right environment and then, it will consume the believer. So for me, religion should be treated like radioactive material. Even if it feels nice, there are loads of things that feel nice but are ultimately very bad for us. It's an inherently flawed system. It's radioactive. I think religion should be treated as an " adult activity" . It's no different from people who cosplay or act in plays or clean up highways or whatever else they do. Adults have more mature brains and we have life experiences that can help us mitigate the worst attributes of religion. For children, it's toxic. It's like giving your child cocaine and expecting there to be no ramifications. That child is young. Very few life experiences. Very immature brain. Not enough practice thinking. They're extremely vulnerable to being damaged by religious culture. (Think of the boys and girls who lived with purity culture. Some of them can't enjoy sex because their religion traumatized them to pathologize sex. So now, they're married and it's a problem. They need therapy to fix what religion broke.) If people could be sensible around religion, I'd have less of a problem. People who argue about whether Hulk is stronger or Captain Marvel is stronger.. they understand that it's just a game. Religious people don't understand that their faith is a game. This is why they'll chop people's heads off or burn them alive. There are no brakes. (Side note - I really despise this idea that you can't be " spiritual" without religion. I have been moved to tears by listening to a pianist play their heart out. I have been struck with awe at seeing a sunset. I have felt the world move when I learned something new that opened my eyes to yet another part of reality. What on earth does religion give me that can mimic those authentic moments where I just existed and felt being in that moment? I'm spiritual. I just don't need ghosts or gods or some religious ceremony to get that high.)

You are not an atheist if you do not believe in god.

@@Eimrine what?

@@imfirinmilazar if you accept the fact that a "god" word means something defined then you aren't atheist.

@@Eimrine what is that supposed to mean?

@@Eimrine an atheist is someone who doesn't believe in a god. That's it that's the whole definition. But i understand what you are trying to say... I think.

He is definitely very lucky, although I am afraid his sample is not random (which does not invalidate his conclusions per se). For many surveys you would not want the survey shared in an uncontrolled fashion, and in such a case you really can't get a lot of responses.

The method I used is called snowball sampling and is often used in cases like this where it is quite difficult to find your target group tied up nice and neat in a bow.

Matt: (strolls the department hallways to the tune of "Why Not" by Ghostface Playa.)

Right?! I got like 100 but that was actually a pretty good size considering I was surveying a very specific group in one region. I think a lot of this depends of how big the group is and the parameters of the study so it's probably best not to compare with others (or so I tell myself XD)

Link yours, maybe we can help

Obedience to God is doing what is right by doing what you are told

I dont think either of those are verbs mate

@@thehungarywaffleinc.7775 Only if he exists...

@@reecelongden3500 I Believe The Holy Trinity does exist

@@thehungarywaffleinc.7775 😠 Really? What evidence do you have for such belief? Evidence that other people can observe through their senses. Not what you were told by some authority figure. Not what you read in a text. Real, tangible evidence.

Fabulous story!

Well she was probably shy because it isn't usual for a Muslim woman to talk to strange men, especially atheists. So why don't you stop being wimpy and ASK HER how the kids are. "Hey, I wonder if you remember me. I'm the atheist guy from Istanbul. I taught your kids how to swim. We had a lot of enjoyable arguments about God together. I was just thinking about that time and honestly, I'm sorry we never spoke again. I was wondering how are you guys? Is everything going okay? How are the kids? I hope they didn't forget their swimming skills 😀😁"

Sorry for the wait. It's due Nov. 25.

I'm an agnostic pantheist and I run up against the same issue with "scriptural" theists when it comes to morality. Mine also comes from humanist secularism.

I don't understand the claim of theists that they get their moral code from the bible (or any other holy text). What part or parts of scripture, and why those? What is the moral lesson you take from it, and why is that not the same as some other theist's, of even from the same flavour of theism? Doesn't that mean you (or the (religious) community you're part of) do in fact have your own source of morals, and you just pick those parts parts of scripture that seems to affirm that?

@@eefaaf if you've ever been to a church service you'll see that they literally do this. They'll cherry pick down from line to line and then even have the audacity to tell you at the beginning exactly which lines they're specifically cherry picking

if I am an atheist then I will live only for my pleasure, even though it is far from moral and endangers people and the environment around me,I don't care, the important thing is that my life is peaceful, because this is my life and I have the right to my pleasure, maybe that's the picture if I'm an atheist,,then you can imagine if people have such understanding,,and if you think of a world without religion from god,,that is a very dark thing,,religion in my opinion is the love of god for humans so that they live in peace,, but many people stay away from their religion, and if I do that, I will definitely be a fool and insolent

"He sends down the angels with revelations with His command to whom He wills among His servants, (by saying) namely, "Warn (My servants), that there is no god but Me, so you should fear Me."" (Surat an-Nahl 16: Verse 2) "He created the heavens and the earth with truth. Most exalted is Allah from what they associate." (Surat an-Nahl 16: Verse 3) "He has created man from semen, he turned out to be a real dissident." (Surat an-Nahl 16: Verse 4) "And He has created livestock for you, in them there is (hair) that warms and various benefits, and some of it you eat." (Surat an-Nahl 16: Verse 5)

I always knew that quote as coming from Ricky Gervais. Now I feel like a dumbass

That doesn't make any sense. The reason why Christians reject the existence of other gods is very different from why atheists reject any gods. Atheists base their beliefs on observation and reason, whereas for Christians it's revelation. The Bible is very clear that there is only one God.

Im an atheist and i'm not sure if i agree with that statement. The reason religious people believes in a god is because they thought their god is the right one, not the other ones. It's like saying i don't believe in evolution because i believe in creationism. They don't say i don't believe in evolution because there no reason for me to

there are a lot of people who are so used to being able to define people in groups or that people belong themselfs in groups that they can't even fathom the idea of not belonging to one. For example here in brazil, where futball is basicly a second religion, since I was a kind and even recetly people have asked me "what is your team?" or "which team up will you cheer up to?". I allways said none, and usually that got followed up by those people thinking that I must be a partypooper or that I will cheer "against futball". No, I just like online games more

@@dinamosflams I have never liked foot ball, I prefer individual sports, in my youth I was a good cross country runner and I also raced motorcycles. I get slightly annoyed when people, usually women, assume I will go crazy over football, I don`t.

@@dinamosflams I agree as an argentinian. Every once in a while I get asked that same question, or "Are you of River or Boca?" (the biggest teams here), to which I avoid replying. Generally I'm only interested in football during World Cups.

How is it not? Believing that God doesn't exist is still a belief about God, and is therefore a religion.

@@Williamatics You obviously didn't watch the video super closely since he detailed why atheism isn't a worldview. But it also isn't a religion because we don't worship a god or gods. So it's kind of hard to be a religion when you don't have something that, by definition, a religion has.

I agree. It's nearly impossible to disprove that a god could possible exist when the universe is so large and unknown, I simply don't believe in any of the "mainstream" ones. my interest in the bible and biblical figures is similar to my interest in Greek mythology. I like the lore, history, and storytelling but that's about it

@@hillaryandmichaelcrymes3702 I think that the current estimate is that there are around 200 billion galaxies. Galaxies! And that there might be around 40 billion planets that might support life in the Milky Way alone. Our galaxy is an insignificant speck in the universe, our planet even more so. It seems incredibly egoistic that a creator of all that cares about judging our daily lives. Greek mythology is a good example what essentially we are doing, creating stories we want or need to hear. And that's fine, that's part of our nature. Just don't imprison or kill me because I don't agree with your personal headcanon.

I wonder why most humans over time are more inclined to do mischief and bloodshed, if you pay attention to history, and if You think that God needs to be worshiped, God is the creator of this universe, he is omnipotent over everything, he only sent down his teachings so that humans stop doing bad things. If God is indifferent to humans, more damage will occur, but why do you think that God's teachings are what he needs, I think that is one of his affections for humans

@@saadalazmi9965 ..., he only sent down his teachings so that humans stop doing bad things. ... 1 Sam 15; 2-3. Scriptural hopscotch is a little bit naughty.

Well, the old gods gained "power" through popularity, or in realistic terms, their cults became more influential because they had more members. Attendance-taking is just a way of keeping score.

Fortunately, the burden of proof is not on the atheist, as proving a negative is not how reason and logic works.

​@@solido888yea it is.

@@skp8748 no. The theist claims god exists. The burden of proof is on the theist.

I love the term ‘disprove atheism’ which I’ve heard a lot, if you think about it, it makes no sense. How can you disprove that someone doesn’t believe in a god(s)

​@@philipeflop9943 Well you could say that's just a modern version of the word "apologism". Few people in history were literally atheists, so what apologists were trying to do was justify their own beliefs *about* God - this could be the Christians arguing with Muslims, Muslims with Buddhists, Jews with whoever etc. The thing about apologism was that everyone in the argument tended to assume that god(s) really *did* exist - they were arguing over *how* god existed. Only recently that actual Atheism has become an actual identity that people actually hold, has apologism shifted from justifying one's own beliefs, to trying to "disprove" others' non-belief. None-the-less, such "atheism disprovers" still use the same arguments as apologists. The problem is that the frame of the argument has changed - now all their arguments about "how" god exists are useless in the face of "whether" god exists. And they're often very angry about it.

@@philipeflop9943 mostly bad faith arguments about how atheists are too rebellious, bitter, or ashamed to admit they believe in a god

@@mullac1992 a good point, in my experience theists tend to get angry because you can’t argue with logic and reason, so it’s borne out of frustration. Personally I have no qualms with anybody believing in whatever they like as long as it doesn’t cause harm to anyone else ✌️

@@philipeflop9943 Oh yeah I'm not saying believing in God is bad at all - it's a very good way to give comfort, meaning, and direction to life. However, for those who are so invested in their beliefs that they feel the need to shut others down, I'm just explaining where their arguments come from.

Matt practices Judaism but was raised in a cult of Christianity.

Actually I fall into the negative atheist category and I similarly don't belive that only the phisical world exists: I'm just not convinced that anything else exists apart from that, the same way I'm not convinced that any god exists. The burden of proof is still yours, belivers. Sorry ;)

@@gaborraski354 Unfortunately that's where alot of folks have it backwards. Christians don't have to prove anything to anyone. Christians are only required to give you information to help direct you. Once you are provided the Gospel of Christ as evidenced and foretold (historic verification) it is on you. A Christian cannot force you to believe what they say, God cannot force you to believe either. It becomes a decision to be judged in the afterlife. Science is proving more and more alignment with Biblical History. Remember the Bible as it is today was not written as a complete book, it is a library of Historic Documents written in standard history/letter/law documents of the time. But I digress. As I heard it years ago, here is a way to think of it as far as proving to anyone..... If a Christian is right, what to you have to loose. If the Christian is wrong what do they have to loose.

​@@gaborraski354 You're wrong about the burden being on me though. The reason? I don't care what you believe in nor do I have a mission to make you believe in anything, as I see it You will either burn in hell for your sins or you won't. Where you end up is up to yourself.

@@VindensSaga Does your faith not require you to do what you can to help others become enlightened and gain salvation?

Too bad

@@MrAaaaazzzzz00009999 Well, ok then

@@wanderingrandomer 🤓

I really relate to that. My whole extended family is Old Apostolic Lutheran. Growing up I was never able to play sports or watch TV since it is a "sin". I totally agree and understand with you how prideful, religious family members can be.

I can relate too. I'm also an Atheist of the "I've thought a lot about the topic, and have concluded that there is no god" type, though I do take it one step further in that I'm also the "I've studied every religion I can find, and no god I've learned about is worthy of worship even were they to be real" type. My aunt, with whom I get along very well, is an Anglican minister. There have been some very interesting discussions over dinner, but there have also been some rather heated arguments after a few drinks.

I don't think that's weird at all. I'm a "positive atheist" and I find religion fascinating, esp. non Christian. Being 'murican, I have plenty of contact/experience with Christianity, so there's less to discover, and, American Christians are often VERY difficult to talk to about religion.

Yes -- someone else who sees religious myths as interesting fiction that has had a strong effect on society! I've often thought that for example, Star Trek is similar to religion in that people watch and rewatch episodes cyclically (like a Daf Yomi sort of thing), dress in funny clothes, form supportive communities, and take life lessons from their canon ... but the whole time, they acknowledge it as fictional and embedded in a social context. But in the end, it scratches much the same itch as religion.

Doesn't seem weird. An interest in religion, beyond what is spoon fed in Sunday School, birthed many an atheist. We don't become less interested in religion, we simply move religion into the mythology category. We can find equal fascination in the Greek, Norse, Mesopotamian, or Hindu tales. In fact, when we're not obsessed with veracity, we can dismiss a few inconsistencies and more easily enjoy the stories.

The new Andor show has been really good. 👍

not wasting time watching Rise of Skywalker just makes you a smarter Star Wars fan, not a lesser one lol

Yes indeed a very interesting species.

Completely agree great video and very informative, though I do find issue with him calling all young children and babies atheist

@@swedish-monarchist2457 maybe you skipped the part where he defines what it is

@@swedish-monarchist2457 We'll, they can't have belief in a higher power if they haven't been taught the concept yet.

​@@swedish-monarchist2457 i feel like it make sense thou as a child being a thiest doesnt make sense a believe should be volenteerly and a considered thing. which is the same as other implicit type which either didnt considered it or dont care that much.

I am more interested in adding to my religious/ irreligious collection of videos on playlist. As an apatheistic person though conversation beyond what others feel ...I doubt I could bring much to the table personally.

I don't understand what you mean. Why did you never imagine a series like this? What aspect of it do you find remarkable?

@@febotroilo7225 as an atheist-humanist in a family of theists, I’m not used to someone with a belief in God or gods treating my worldview with respect and understanding.

Don't just claim humanism as an atheist, read the books, study the world view and be ready to defend your beliefs from criticism. Do you believe morality is relative? absolute? Do you think it matters? etc.

@@kp074 I don't think you understood the video - babies must be atheists as they have no knowledge of any of humans religions or philosophy. They are not the type of atheists who have considered the arguments carefully and rejected them, they are of the kind who genuinely don't know (anything!).

@@jim-bob87 Yeah, that's where you're wrong, and so is the video. Atheism is an absence of belief in the existence of deities. It presumes one understands what a deity is. Babies don't, since they lack the use of language beyond a certain level. Babies are neither theists, nor are they atheists. Since they neither have the capacity for religious belief in a deity, nor to explicitly "reject" a belief, they don't fit into either of these categories. One can't simply assume either of these labels for babies, hence the categorical error. Now, is that too hard for you to understand?

@@kp074 atheists don't reject a belief. They don't hold it. Babies hold no beliefs whatsoever. You are talking about a narrow type of atheism which actively considers and rejects one particular belief or the possibility of any deity existing. Atheism includes agnostics who do not claim to know if a particular god is real. Like babies.

@@jim-bob87 Holds no beliefs whatsoever, I see. So then, a rock holds no beliefs whatsoever, does that make it an atheist? A jellyfish is an atheist? Alpha Centauri C is an atheist? Lol, what's the purpose of the category if you're going to club the babies, and by extension of your logic fully-functioning adult humans with it? You see, you need to be aware of something to hold it (or not hold it), which makes for the two categories, viz. theism and atheism. Agnostics are neither, that's another category. Children are neither of the three. Rocks or jellyfishes are neither of the four. 😂

@@kp074 it's clear you didn't watch or understand the video. We are all atheists about 1000s of deities. A percentage of humans have decided to be theists about a tiny subset of those. Rocks are atheists but this this meaningless as it won't impact their world view 😂

Watch Dr Haitham Talaat videos,for your own good.

@@nael1722 I’ve watched him. He feels more like a preacher or an apologist rather than a “doctor” to me…

Aaaaand then completely dances around the burden of proof by simply declaring it not interesting,. Disappointing.. Theres a reason you get the burden of proof. You are making a claim Its insulting to just dismiss it and talk about humanism instead.

I'm thinking a lot of the responses are likely from "Western" countries considering where the surveys got responses on the internet. Having come from a religious (Catholic) upbringing and having had friends from youth that have either become more more religious or up to full-blown forceful Athiests, I can say a few of the Athiests have a resentment toward Theism in general. I don't fault them because their religious upbringing was very oppressive. I consider myself an Athiest, but I'm more of a relaxed Atheist. Just be a good person, don't hurt people, mind your own business kind of person LOL.

Ya i was thinking the same...Americans use reddit the most.

@@TheHomerowKeys "Western countries" includes a group of wildly different states regarding the influence of religion on everyday life, a good contrast would be the USA vs sweden. I personally started out as a theist and became an atheist, but since i didn't have to deal with theists for a long time i didn't think about the topic for many years. This only changed when i moved and had to deal with religious people on a somewhat regular basis (including a roommate who wanted to convert me)

Sorry you had to deal with a roommate like that. That's not fun. His research wasn't about upbringing or how vocally religious a region was to people who describe themselves as Atheists. I would be interested in what you're talking about though. I grew up Catholic and a number of my peers grew up to be very vocal Atheists because of how oppressive their upbringings were. As an Atheist who grew up with in a very heavy-handed faith-based community in the American Northeast. I'm not as resentful to religious people as some of the now-Atheists I grew up with, but I would definitely say environment in youth definitely plays a part in how you view (a)theism later in life.

@@TheHomerowKeys What i was trying to express is, that if basically everyone around you is an atheist, it becomes less important in regards to your worldview, at least from my experience. I have interacted with both communists and radical nationalists who are atheists and they wouldn't necessarily align with the humanist worldview. +people can have various supernatural beliefs while still being atheists. What i am curious about is wether people from these regions are represented in the study or bot and if yes if they are the exception or the rule. My current impression based on where the survey was spread is that it is probably representative of american atheists and not atheists in general.

If you're not already familiar with it, I think you'll find the lecture "What makes a bully" by Dr. Gordon Neufeld intersting. It has, more than anything else, informed my understanding of bullying and the role of empathy in much of human behavior. It put it on my channel when the original host went down.

You were born without a proposition on the subject whether the world has a creator or creators. Without a proposition is not the same as having a proposition of NO. And having a proposition of YES is not necessary related to religion/church/sing/pray.

@@adamc1694 Nobody claimed they were born with a "proposition of no" ...they were born with no proposition. As you already admitted. No proposition of god, no belief in god.

@@LastBastian exactly. My parents said it was up to me to make up my mind about this and they didn't really talk about their believes but I've never seen them pray or attend church... Although I would say they were somewhat spiritual at times...

@Iva Kaderková Same here. I don't understand why people get their backs up just because they have different religious beliefs. It truly seems to be an American thing.

@@adamc1694 You can call it proposition, you can also call it a brainwash. If nobody comes up with the idea, you don't even start to think about it. The question is not coming up by itself, only other humans can provide you with their fantasy.

Some of those who feel the connection to the divine through nature call ourselves "pagans."

You can't be both a Buddhist and a atheist at the same time 💀💀💀

@@alfieingrouille1528 You're wrong.

@@AethelwulfBretwalda Buddhism is litterally a religion you simply can't be both a Buddhist and a athestist that's not how atheism works

@@alfieingrouille1528 You're wrong. That's not how Buddhism works though. Siddhartha Gautama was not a god. His teaching was not a religion in a metaphysical sense.

“Omg” ?

@@The-Devils-Advocate Holy shit!

"Omg," says the atheist...

Thank god I'm an atheist!

Hey buddy! How's Taiwan?

@@UsefulCharts Good. It's way more developed and western than I expected. Though teaching is a bit anxiety inducing. But I'm liking it.

Are Buddhists considered negative Atheists? After all, there are no gods in Buddhism, but there is something to believe in....

Best comment, Virginia! *"Atheists only exist from the point of view of the non-atheist."* Thank you!

@Virginia Moss: to quote Ricky Gervais, there should not even be the need for the word "atheist".

This is why I like the KZfaq name "non stamp collerctor" so much.

This at best is an argument that *you do not identify as* not believing in god. It doesn't prevent you from being an atheist. Like indeed you might be a non-stampcollector, a non-inuit, and a non-amoeba. You cannot simply withdraw from being one of either out of two binary options.

@@landsgevaer I am only an atheist from your point of view, from your emotional needs, from your "education" and from your fantasies. Why do you care that I find no need for your beliefs? Your argument indicates that you are so deep in your own needs that you can't fathom another person could not possibly have the same exact needs, so therefore, that other person needs a label, preferably a negative one.