Can you please tell me what make the metal water bottle is with the hand grip thanks Mike brilliant video bud

@@Ruffbiker68 Ill have a look about for you mate, took me and my brother ages to find that shape one, if i can find them i'll let you know.

ladies, any aerosol can, deoderant, hairspray etc

if you use weapon on people you will go to jail.What is the average sentence for Section 18? If convicted of a Section 18 GBH, the maximum sentence you could receive is a life sentence of imprisonment. Most cases will not be sentenced to life imprisonment, the most severe cases have a starting point of 12-years imprisonment. At the lower end of severity, a starting point of 3-years imprisonment will be taken

@@johnwick1483 if someone is trying to kill you (say with a knife) i suspect using a pen or a bottle to defend yourself (that you just happened to have on you) would be classed as reasonable force = no prison / conviction, what you're talking about is being the attacker, i'm not.

Quality! I have never heard that before! and so very true! Pete 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿

2 feet in the dock is better than 6 feet in the ground.

Exactly mate!

This. Technically speaking you can legitimately be arrested for carrying a roll of soggy toilet paper but only if you say it's for the express purpose of self-defense. It may sound ridiculous and honestly most police will just laugh but technically.... It's arrestable.

Rule 2- if you have to use something for self defense you better use something that is effective in any situations, like a Glock 19 and then explain to the police that you are only carrying it in your pocket as a weight so the wind won't blow you away, it helps you to stay grounded 😂You'll probably go to prison (based on the current laws) but at least you'll be alive.

Disguise a brick as block of cheese by painting it orange and glueing a slice of bread to each side.

Yes and make sure it’s an every day object like an umbrella and not an iron bar!

David I just can't believe that we aren't allowed to have anything to protect ourselves we should at least be able to carry pepper spray

I make my own pepper spray 😁🤟👍

@@Ruffbiker68 l make my own pepper 🤗

Davidbrowne you could move to Canada Australia.. Oh wait.. 😂

Try to ignore the so called government as much as possible.

Only criminals are armed

Except when you use it. Then justify it.

Israel has the right to defend itself. Us on the other hand..

Where do you live? Gaza?

@@gobalmighty7463 I carry in the UK the same 1911 that I carried in Gaza, what's your point?!!! Or do you even have one

Very true!

Totally agree , check out my comment on law being backwards.

That's right. In the 1953 debate in UK parliament of the Offensive Weapons Act, the Home Secretary said that you have to avoid being in a situation where you will need to defend yourself !

Thank you, good idea! I tried hairspray but it only made my attackers smell nice. Jif Lemon - I'll get a bottle rightaway!

@@LittleKitty22 get some eggs and flour too , then you can charm your wouldbe attacker with an impromptu recipe. Who doesn't love pancakes....

@@julianandrews6025 Unless he's hungry, then he'll just eat it, lol... good idea in principle but it's not really practical to shlepp eggs and flour around - the eggs could break and all, lol.

@@LittleKitty22 There's an adage the way yo a homicidal maniacs heart is through his stomach

it is still illegal for them to carry a weapon, stop fearmongering

@@JMD-er5jq Is that going to stop them then? I think not.

@@JMD-er5jq A smart man only believes half of what he hears, a wise man knows which half. You're missing the point entirely. In the reality of seconds counting while police are a phone call and minutes away, why am I criminalised for utilising the means necessary to preserve my life? Demographics aside regarding violent crime, why are my hands tied by the state when this emboldens the criminal while they put people in jail for 24 moths for putting up stickers?

It's not, they just don't care about the consequences whereas respectable people do.

@@jjefferyworboys8138 The state knows this so why criminalise self preservation?

Just say your attacker dropped it.

I fully agree! protect one self at all costs, there is no proper law protecting us from attackers worth anything.

Better to be tried by 12 than carried by six

The corrupt police are the cause of much crime.

But you stay alive.

English bill of rights 1688 begs to differ USA got there rights from us repealed illegally by the union 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿👍

Thanks mate, great advice too, cheers for watching

Should answer back.Why are you walking about armed to the teeth.

Defending yourself is "racist".

We are allowed to defend ourselves. It's just that any force used must be reasonable, justifiable, necessary and proportionate

@@geordiewishart1683 which means if someone is running after you with a machette, you need to face him unarmed like a man, and then turn around, try to get around the machette and do some jiu jitsu on him but make sure to release when he taps or else you face jail

Hi Mike, is a squirty tube of scotch bonnet pepper legal? whilst wearing a T-shirt that says “ better to be judged by 12 than carried by 6”

The problem with that line of thinking is that if you can carry a firearm then so could your attacker and he's likely to be pointing his gun at you while yours is still in your pocket.

@@petemulhearn7787 London, Liverpool, Manchester are already riddled with guns, it's that way of thinking that get innocent people killed!

Seconds away and won't do FA when they do show up.

The usual is to ask them if they want to press charges

Lmao! I had a can of that when I was at school, oh the memories.

😂😂😂

And the biggest criminal gang all wear black uniform with bright green vests at times. They are also heavily armed and wear gang symbols.. ohh wait sorry that's police... silly me.

MPs make the laws, the police just enforce them. Local councils have a big say in policing priorities so if you think there's a problem with a law or the way its used write to your MP or local Councilor.

@@petemulhearn7787 I write to my MP often - it does no good.

By the very people you voted for.

yes and none of these items are carried as such mate

😂😂

i'm also a carpenter. once worked with a bloke from devon who got nicked on his way home on a friday with a car boot full of tools for going equipped to commit burglary. of course the courts threw it out but still he spent that weekend in custody. the reason? his local constabulary doesn't like him.

That hammer 🔨 may raise suspicion

Self defence is perfectly legitimate. Carrying a weapon is not. Claiming you carried a legal item for self defence can also be used to prosecute you.

​@@andyrobertson7315 This is hypocrisy, my very legitimate question is, if you are attacked by a gang on the street and they are armed with knives and machetes how you are supposed to defend yourself??? Obviously you'll run if that's possible as no normal person will choose the fight... unless they are stupid, but the truth is that this kid of attacks happen in very short time not really giving you the time to think and analyse the situation also there may be situations when running isn't an option, what then? Well the "justice" system will tell you to call the police if you feel threatened.... you can imagine how this happens in a real scenario, so you walk home on a evening and when you take a corner you see three guys wearing facemasks and hoodies and they are coming towards you, you turn around straight away but you realise that there are another two of them who are approaching from behind, you can't run and you see one of them pulling a knife while another one is pulling up a machete from under his jacket so what now? Based on the law you should call the police, now that means that you have to politely and respectfully ask your attackers to just give you a minute to call the police while you are apologising for the wait and the inconvenience ( because you are a well mannered person, you don't want to unnecessarily waste anyone's time, right) so you ask them nicely to wait for you until you call the police. Let's say even if they are polite enough (which I seriously doubt) to give you some time and patiently wait until you finish your call, you still have to wait until the police arrive ( average waiting time 30 to 60 mine.) Basically that means that in the best case scenario you are robbed, or the worst case scenario you are stabbed and cut and you are bleeding out on the pavement and the arriving police will only find your dead body. It will be too late for you to complain to the government about the fact that their laws regarding self defense is wrong... As a human being one of the main and basic human right is the right for self defense and as criminals never ask for permission to arm themselves and are always prepared to carry out their crime, you as a free human being also have the right to arm your self with a weapon that is appropriate and comfortable for you and which you can use effectively and with confidence in a self defense situation regardless of the unreasonable and abusive laws which are denying that right. You are responsible for your own and your family's safety. I put this in a simple to understand principle. If the government says that it's illegal for you to live are you expected to respect the law and let yourself killed? Government has proven over and over that they are a criminal mafia style organisation and have no rightful authority to promote and enforce unreasonable and abusive laws. So it's your responsibility only if you choose to arm yourself.. The only free and right society is a society where citizens have the right to be legally armed and trained in the safe use of guns. A real and reasonable weapons ban is acceptable and makes sense only in a completely crimeless society. Only an oppressive government is afraid of legally armed citizens.

@@romyhezser7630well done you have just become an American defending the 2nd amendment....yes obviously in the scenario you describe at great length you have found yourself in a world of trouble. Also in an ideal world you would be able to carry something to protect yourself (actually in an ideal world we wouldn't be attacked but you get my point). MY point however was based purely on the legality of carrying anything that could either be classed as a weapon, or when questioned, the person carrying it said it was for self defence. I'm not getting into this BS about "free human being", we do NOT live in the perfect free country people seem to wish for. There will always be rules that, like it or not, apply to all of us. However if you want to go out carrying something for self defence, please feel free to do so, and let everyone know how the police react if you are caught

@@andyrobertson7315 Yes I do really agree that we have to respect some rules, a modern and evolved society cannot exist without rules but those rules have to be right and reasonable promoted and defended by a right and reasonable government who is doing their rightful job which is the administration of the country and the protection of their citizens, if that would be the case I would respect all the rules and would be happy to live in a free and right society. I'm not advocating lawlessness or anarchy but when the government is corrupt and looks more like a bunch of well organised criminals who shows total disrespect and ignorance towards their own citizens, who are more interested in changing the genders of children and allowing people with mental health issues to "teach" in schools ( I'm referring to trans people)...etc when a government act this way, it's a sign that they are completely corrupted and have lost all their authority, from that stage you are on your own, you can't expect them to defend you or your family. Regarding on what you said that "you are free to arm yourself and see how the police will react" ...I say this and just please think. What you would prefer being charged with the procurement of an illegal weapon and eventually go to prison for a while or you and your family be the victim of a violent crime in which either you or one or more of your family members are murdered, and before you say that you don't want either one which is perfectly normal, just think about how many have died in violent crimes stabbings, shootings, home invasions... every normal person hopes that something like that never happen yet what about those who died as victims in such crime? They didn't hoped for a peaceful life, did they wanted somehow to die??? I don't think so. While it's very nice to be optimistic and positive, being naive and ignorant it's definitely a mistake.

@@romyhezser7630. You are correct. Their answer is to hand over responsibility to an army of unqualified mini-tyrants, or just let you take a hit for the narrative. Legislating out human nature is unsustainable.

Hehe. I hope this gets many likes 😂

This is where you need a Fire and Rescue standard, sort of axe.

Didn't help me. My attackers just laughed in my face. Don't reply on such things, same with hairspray - it just made my attackers smell nice and they laughed all the more.

That says that Protestants may OWN (not bear) arms for their defence, subject to limitations of law. So no unlicensed firearms, or prohibited weapons such as flick knives etc. That leaves a lot of basically medieval stuff. But only if you are a Protestant which I of course am.

In the context of where it was signed, outside of Parliament, which was done so that it could not be subverted by statutory interpretation, it is not referring to statutory law, it is referring to natural law which is encompassed in our common law, which is older than the state, dating back to the times of the druids. I repeat, our right to self defence does not come from government. @@simonh6371If you want to know the thinking of the 1688 bill of rights you can read a book by its author, John Sommers, which is entitled "the judgement of whole kingdoms and nations, concerning the rights power and prerogative of Kings, and the rights privileges and properties of the people". It was once considered essential for every household to own.

haha, i love it, lol, and very ture.

True. The dog has a gun - I can't stop him, officer, he refuses to take his medication...

@@LittleKitty22 haha yep sounds about right

They took our weapons away so they can do exactly what they are doing to us now

It’s happened over a period of time by people aquiescing to increasing governmental dictatorial control. In other words most people are wilfully ignorant cowards.

It’s happened over a period of time by people aquiescing to increasing governmental dictatorial control. In other words most people are wilfully ignorant cowards.

Hey an Alan Partridge fan! :D Australia, Canada and most other places with UK influence are at it aswell

@@rooroo9216 Smell my cheese! Monkey tennis???

I guess that's because they are all mentally retarded.

And then you woke up and it had all been a dream 😂

Can is a great idea mate, and the tightly folded newspaper! i have heard of that loads of times, but never experimented with it, cheers for watching!

Folded newspaper is good for wasps as well.

Reminds me of that idea from icarly "A rock in a sock"

100% agree with you, they could easily license pepper spray etc so that only people without violent criminal convictions can have it. Someone needs to push for this politically, (Maybe it needs to be someone who's reading this or maybe even I should be doing this) we're supposed to live in a democracy and my general experience has been when talking to people around this topic is they're entirely unaware of the general self defense laws in the UK (Until it's too late). Many people are brainwashed into thinking you want to be able to have a machine gun nest in your home if you discuss self defense tooling because the BBC constantly throws anti-America propaganda at them by highlighting the worst parts of America and subtly associating that with the concept of allowing people to have any tools to defend themselves with (There are many other options than firearms). There are plenty of other countries that allow more lenient self defense options than the UK and are far better off than those bad examples they use in America (The problems come from specific states, showing the bad ones as an example for the whole of America is incredibly misleading but that's a different issue entirely).

yep. steel not alu tho

Washing up liquid? That stuff really stings.

I keep reading the parliamentary debate from 1953 about the then proposed 'Offensive Weapons' bill. ( It's on the internet, and worth a look, see Hansard. ) An opposition MP was making a point that took me a while to grasp. See, I always thought that an offence for possessing a weapon was only committed if you didn't have a reasonable excuse, but it's pointed out that the offence is committed just by possession, the 'reasonable excuse' just stops someone being prosecuted. So in effect, this MP was saying that we are all offenders ! So unless you are carrying nothing, including clothes, you are a criminal !

Keep fit i will tell my 82 year old wife that

Thanks mate, cheers for watching, yeah the walking sticks are great for this type of thing

great idea forgot about dog leads

Expanding foam ...evil. stuff 😊

I'm 67 and never had the situation where I was attacked by someone with a weapon. It does happen here but very infrequently. Because weapons etc are banned that means that people don't have them (yeah, gangsters find them I know), therefore they are not necessary for self defence.

@@philipbirch9183 lots of gangsters here

In the Uk , the only legal use of self defense when yourlife or families is when their is an imminent threat to life, which is highly contentious and subjective, check out the farmer Tony Martin who killed a lad who was in his property with a licensed legal shotgun he ended up convicted of criminality. In the UK we are expected to just use stiffupper lip.😂

@@julianandrews6025 THE KID WAS RUNNING AWAY, SHOTGUNS ARE ONLY LICENSED FOR SPORTING USE

I live in London , not the bad parts but I’ve never experienced or know anyone who has ever needed weapons to protect themselves

I blame Danmy Trejo personally