Ukraine Uses a Yak-52 Trainer to Hunt Drones

  Рет қаралды 56,274

Suchomimus

Suchomimus

Ай бұрын

Video shows a Yak-52 trainer aircraft being used by Ukraine to hunt drones.
Support the Channel
www.patreon.com/user?u=80032585
buymeacoffee.com/suchomimus99

Пікірлер: 428
@martinlatvian5538
@martinlatvian5538 Ай бұрын
The slow speed of Yak-52 in this situation is an advantage. There are no limits for Ukrainian ingenuity.
@donwyoming1936
@donwyoming1936 Ай бұрын
The funny thing is, we offered them Super Tucanos twp years ago, and they declined. This is more like desperation, since they passed up some truly power, modern propeller aircraft.
@stariyczedun
@stariyczedun Ай бұрын
Also it's quite economical to fly and new pilots will have some target practice. win-win
@chrisjames3087
@chrisjames3087 Ай бұрын
@@donwyoming1936 The Super Tucano is a counter-insurgency aircraft. The situation in Ukraine is anything but an insurgency. Even something like an old Shilka or even manually-aimed ZU-23-2 autocannons would make mincemeat of an airplane flying barely faster than WW2 fighters.
@bastogne315
@bastogne315 Ай бұрын
Wat if the Orlan attacks the Yak???
@robertpatrick3350
@robertpatrick3350 Ай бұрын
@@chrisjames3087Tucano’s any where near the front would be suicidal……. However back from the front they would be perfect in this role….. russian drones penetrate the full depth of Ukraine whilst russia’s much hyped anti air and air to air doesn’t.
@FarrellMcGovern
@FarrellMcGovern Ай бұрын
'Too close for missiles, switching to guns'
@takix2007
@takix2007 Ай бұрын
"Too close for nose mounted gun, switching to handheld gun, a.k.a pistol"
@cristo6007
@cristo6007 Ай бұрын
"Yakety Yak don't talk back" 😊
@iancurtis1152
@iancurtis1152 Ай бұрын
Damn! Stole my thunder😁
@trull122
@trull122 Ай бұрын
well said sir.
@WayneTheSeine
@WayneTheSeine Ай бұрын
😁
@BigMeechEJ25
@BigMeechEJ25 Ай бұрын
My Dad used to play that song a lot when I was a kid. When I started studying WW2 a lot in High School this always popped into my head when reading about a Yak airframe of some sort.
@WhiteWolf65
@WhiteWolf65 Ай бұрын
Hate to say it, but these Yak's DO talk back! They say "Get outa my skies!" and Enforce it with LEAD! Slava Ukraini!
@filibertkraxner305
@filibertkraxner305 Ай бұрын
Full circle back to 1914 tactics. Didn't see that coming!
@beersmurff
@beersmurff Ай бұрын
Yes they killed quad drones the same way in 1914 ;-P
@andrerothweiler9191
@andrerothweiler9191 Ай бұрын
They are slow, easy. to hide, plenty ammunition. Why not?
@GarrisonFall
@GarrisonFall Ай бұрын
The Ukrainians continue to impress me with their ingenuity and creativity. Stay strong Ukraine!
@timcheeseman2956
@timcheeseman2956 Ай бұрын
The Red Baron would be proud
@radbaron
@radbaron Ай бұрын
Impressed, even.
@chesthairascot3743
@chesthairascot3743 Ай бұрын
Ukraine is currently the world's sole producer of folk heros.
@marswalkerpilot2303
@marswalkerpilot2303 Ай бұрын
back in the mid 90s i used to fly yak 52 from Ukraine to the uk and other countries in europe for resale, they are great aircraft and can pull 6 g in a super tight turn.
@Mortthemoose
@Mortthemoose Ай бұрын
Wow. That sounds like an interesting job!
@t.d.5804
@t.d.5804 Ай бұрын
I still got one, 1980 with flat rivets and a MT 3 blade, great plane. Some of the instruments like the clock were made in Ukraine
@garyjones9023
@garyjones9023 Ай бұрын
The Japanese Zero fighter, with its high maneuverability, low wing loading, and a stall speed below 69 mph would make an ideal drone interceptor!
@beersmurff
@beersmurff Ай бұрын
Seeing as it's not being mass produced or hasnt been in over 78 years I doubt it would be effecient compared to a plane that does the job, is at hand, can find plenty of cheap spare parts and even have facilities that can produce them still running in UA and your pilots know exactly how to fly them. People overthink this. Simple is better than what-was and could-be.
@whatnowstinky
@whatnowstinky Ай бұрын
They need to add a ww1 Scarff ring with something like an MG3 with the rate of fire turned up and thermal optics.
@WayneTheSeine
@WayneTheSeine Ай бұрын
I wonder if the US still has any of the OV-10 Bronco's laying around. Maybe the Marine Corps still has a few. They were used in Vietnam and were a worthy airframe suited for lingering, reconisance, close air support and came armed with 7.62 mm machine guns with 2,000 rounds, and external weapons including a gun pod with 20 mm (0.79 in) M197 electric cannon, and AIM-9 Sidewinder air-to-air missiles. Some quick research reveals there are still quite a few of them around in the US and other countries. The OV-10 can land and take off on roads and is considered a STOL aircraft...short take off and landing. There are a lot of Vietnam era propeller driven planes that could be considered good candidates. One version of te OV-10 had night vision gear as well.
@RedFail1-1
@RedFail1-1 Ай бұрын
Only ones still flying are owned by civilians
@TCW838
@TCW838 Ай бұрын
We do. A few were used in Afghanistan. A better idea would be to use the new "Sky Warden". The USAFs answer for exactly this type of thing. Essentially a armed and a bit armored (from small arms ground fire) crop duster.
@ChucksSEADnDEAD
@ChucksSEADnDEAD Ай бұрын
They were brought back for evaluation. They were retired again because maintaining such old airframes is expensive.
@BWite-pk1ov
@BWite-pk1ov Ай бұрын
​@@ChucksSEADnDEADI believe nasa got the upgraded ov10+ models
@WayneTheSeine
@WayneTheSeine Ай бұрын
@@TCW838 Looks pretty cool. Looks like a highend crop duster with tons of power.
@Itsjustme-Justme
@Itsjustme-Justme Ай бұрын
Nice to see a light aircraft pilot who knows what the rudder is for👍 This interception looks like an early (first) test with highly improvised armament. I'm sure they are already working on an improvement. The Yak-52 is an ideal design for a drone hunter. It can be operated from short grass strips or ordinary streets with little to no infrastructure (a workshop truck and a fuel truck), is easy to fly and highly maneuverable, has a very strong airframe, is easily fast enough and can also fly slow enough to follow every fixed wing, piston engine or electric drone. The very traditional, all metal design is easy to maintain and easy to repair and it is the key to a very wide variety of possible modifications. There is a huge, world wide used market and they are still in serial production in Lithuania and Romania (and Russia). The aircraft has been highly popular in the western world since the 90s and there are thousands of experienced pilots and aircraft maintainers and serveral sources for all kinds of replacement parts including at least some engine parts. The only downside is that the engine (Russian modification of an older Ukrainian design!) currently is only in production in Russia, but if the concept gets deployed on a larger scale, that should be solvable within a few months. 👍
@CoffeeAndPaul
@CoffeeAndPaul Ай бұрын
Jay Leno uses additive manufacturing to work up rare spares for his very oldest cars & motorcycles. His mechanics laser scan each cleaned, solo part, & if that part ever breaks they have its digital model on file, ready to be 3D -printed 👍👍.
@Itsjustme-Justme
@Itsjustme-Justme Ай бұрын
@@CoffeeAndPaul 3D printing is a great technology when you need one part but expensive and slow in mass production. Classic cast iron and cast alluminum is no rocket science. The engine had been in production in Poland into the early 2000s, probably there are some jigs left. And we should never underestimate the capabilities of the Ukrainian engine industry. There will be a solution if large numbers of replacement engines should be required. As long as the numbers required are small, the vital used market will be enough.
@bigoldgrizzly
@bigoldgrizzly Ай бұрын
where there's a will there's a way.
@greeceuranusputin
@greeceuranusputin Ай бұрын
Gives a whole new meaning to the phrase 'riding shotgun.'
@stanfrymann8454
@stanfrymann8454 Ай бұрын
Or rather, revives the original meaning.
@greeceuranusputin
@greeceuranusputin Ай бұрын
@@stanfrymann8454 NO! It predates aviation, going back to Stage Coach days at least.
@stanfrymann8454
@stanfrymann8454 Ай бұрын
@@greeceuranusputin That's exactly what I meant. The original meaning was someone riding along with a shotgun for protection. It's returning to the original meaning.
@jaredchristie8882
@jaredchristie8882 Ай бұрын
Cope cage on drones next?
@hardtackbeans9790
@hardtackbeans9790 Ай бұрын
🤣
@LayronPK
@LayronPK Ай бұрын
I laughed too hard 😂
@CAPSLOCKPUNDIT
@CAPSLOCKPUNDIT Ай бұрын
Cope cage is unsuitable for aerial vehicles. Needs a few tires.
@hardtackbeans9790
@hardtackbeans9790 Ай бұрын
@@CAPSLOCKPUNDIT I'm sure neither cope cage or tires will effect aerodynamics.
@TheCaptainbeefylog
@TheCaptainbeefylog Ай бұрын
Yak-52 are a very good airframe. Their top speed is just under 300kph, so probably good to keep up with most drones it's sent up against. They were being made in Romania up until 1998 by Aerostar, who sold about 3,000 of them. They cost about $100,000USD. Bloody good plane.
@leifvejby8023
@leifvejby8023 Ай бұрын
I wonder, kph, is that like km/h, just non metric?
@valamaas
@valamaas Ай бұрын
​@@leifvejby8023they are same.
@TheCaptainbeefylog
@TheCaptainbeefylog Ай бұрын
@@valamaas yep
@LafayetteCCurtis
@LafayetteCCurtis Ай бұрын
@@leifvejby8023 kph is km/h but friendlier to keyboards that don't have anything other than alphanumeric symbols.
@leifvejby8023
@leifvejby8023 Ай бұрын
@@LafayetteCCurtis Why not just write kmh then?
@johnpaulvanson5170
@johnpaulvanson5170 Ай бұрын
Reminiscent of the old Douglas A-1 Skyraider the US used in the Vietnam War. Seems an anachronism (even if the Yak-52 was first built after the Skyraider was retired), but propeller craft have a huge advantage for low speed applications like this and loiter time. Really smart use of resources.
@d.l.d.l.8140
@d.l.d.l.8140 Ай бұрын
Specialized shotguns and rounds? At this point I’m beginning to think the Ukrainians are part Wizard. They’ll figure it out.
@donwyoming1936
@donwyoming1936 Ай бұрын
I heard they were just using AK-74s from the back seat.
@planderlinde1969
@planderlinde1969 Ай бұрын
The Ukranians were always the brains of the Soviet Union.
@d.l.d.l.8140
@d.l.d.l.8140 Ай бұрын
@@planderlinde1969 very true.
@dale-qz9dg
@dale-qz9dg Ай бұрын
​@@planderlinde1969not really a high bar
@danielcamacho1913
@danielcamacho1913 Ай бұрын
Would the shotgun even have to be specialized? At the distance the Yak is circling the drone, it just looks like a matter of using a shotgun with the right choke and the right weight of buckshot. ...But an AK-47 seems just as likely.
@ep8029
@ep8029 Ай бұрын
Great shades of Biggles! Victory to Uiraine.
@keithrosenberg5486
@keithrosenberg5486 Ай бұрын
Shades of WWI! Before fighters evolved, WWI pilots used the same tactic to shoot at the enemy!
@axmajpayne
@axmajpayne Ай бұрын
First trench warfare and now shooting stuff from the back seat of a prop airplane. What's next, Zeppelins?
@AgentXRifle
@AgentXRifle Ай бұрын
Balloons that drops drones from long distance/height… definitely see that happening!
@hakanfranalvdalen1945
@hakanfranalvdalen1945 Ай бұрын
German pilots I heard. "COINCIDENCE?!" -Moscow
@apieceofstring
@apieceofstring Ай бұрын
The specialized support role reminds me of balloon busters.
@beersmurff
@beersmurff Ай бұрын
@@axmajpayne They do have protective air baloons around key areas like Odeassa etc with cable wires. These can help against certain unguided drones etc. Might look like WW1 to some :-)
@mikehansen233
@mikehansen233 Ай бұрын
Ukraine might make good use of our L3Harris OA-1K Sky Warden for combating drones over Ukrainian airspace.
@ArKritz84
@ArKritz84 Ай бұрын
It doesn't have a gun, though, does it? EDIT: Okay, with APKWS it'd make a LOT of sense. Still considerably more expensive than plinking drones with a Yak-52, but possibly more effective, and also considerably cheaper than sending jets after them.
@michaelkimber6203
@michaelkimber6203 Ай бұрын
Another example of Ukrainian improvisation. 👌💪🇺🇦💪🇺🇦
@mickg7299
@mickg7299 Ай бұрын
Ukrainian desperation 😂
@milgeekmedia
@milgeekmedia Ай бұрын
Now this is weird as some time ago I was discussing whether at some point a drone company would develop a fighter drone - thinking along the lines of a scaled down un-manned remote Spitfire! Specifically armed with small calibre MGs.
@dont-want-no-wrench
@dont-want-no-wrench Ай бұрын
yes, AI controlled hunter-killer
@TheFrewah
@TheFrewah Ай бұрын
I think such drones are being developed but they may not be ready for combat yet. I think such a drone should be autonomous to some extent. Controlled by an operator until an enemy drone is detected and then engage auto mode. Any thoughts on this?
@LafayetteCCurtis
@LafayetteCCurtis Ай бұрын
There's no such thing as "fighter drones" so far but Anduril has one that basically works as a reusable SAM with a directional warhead. Ideally the interception should leave most of the airframe intact enough to return to base and be fitted with a new warhead.
@everypitchcounts4875
@everypitchcounts4875 Ай бұрын
Coyote 2c interceptor drone has been around for 7 years. US army just bought 600 of them.
@LafayetteCCurtis
@LafayetteCCurtis Ай бұрын
@@everypitchcounts4875 That one is still about US$100k per unit. Maybe cheap by US standards but Ukraine would probably need to slash that cost down pretty dramatically to be able to scale things up. The Shahed costs anywhere between 10k and 50k depending on which sources we believe so ideally the interceptor should be roughly in that price range too.
@doublebackagain4311
@doublebackagain4311 Ай бұрын
No school like the Old School 👍
@Stellaris556
@Stellaris556 Ай бұрын
The Yak-52s are pretty popular as trainers, aerobatic aircraft & Air Race aircraft. It's also very fast & agile.
@RHGM71
@RHGM71 Ай бұрын
biggest problem with using light aircraft for drone interception is deconflicting air space, which is quite a difficult problem even for modern air defence. Ukraine mostly has old soviet systems that, to put it lightly, weren't designed with heavy emphasis on safety
@hardtackbeans9790
@hardtackbeans9790 Ай бұрын
A trainer isn't made to be cutting edge. Just train the basics. I was thinking how unlikely it is to hit a drone like this, until I realized you just pull up into formation with the drone & it should be easy to hit in fact.
@PhilAndOr
@PhilAndOr Ай бұрын
Yep basically rough and ready airstrip, a small crew and minimal budget can run an operation like this, and protect an area against certain drone threats quite effectively, definately an approach worth pusuing as part of the entire web of air defences. Besides, use what you have available. Not to mention the propoganda wins when you get footage like this put out.
@nwobob
@nwobob Ай бұрын
Difficult to mount a machine gun. Should probably consider shot guns using skeet trained gunners.
@fahey5719
@fahey5719 Ай бұрын
Shotguns have 40 meter range and can hit 40 mph geese, not 120mph drones.
@TheFrewah
@TheFrewah Ай бұрын
Very good idea indeed. I was surprised an intercepted drone deployed a parachute. Is the idea that the drone could be recalled and then salvaged if, for some reason, the orcs decide it’s better to do so? I see no other reason. Thank you!
@bobjohnbowles
@bobjohnbowles Ай бұрын
The Orlan deploys a chute for normal recovery. Maybe someday they will work out that is not such a good idea over enemy territory.
@user-McGiver
@user-McGiver Ай бұрын
EXACTLY!... these drones are just like WW2 planes... [or WW1] and should be dealt likewise...
@LonePiper9599
@LonePiper9599 Ай бұрын
Every owner of a WWII era warbird is probably on their way to Ukraine.
@ButcherSevenActual
@ButcherSevenActual Ай бұрын
First Ukraine develops mini WWII bomber drones, now on to WWI style shoot downs. They on that retro vibe.
@wrd777
@wrd777 Ай бұрын
They musy have been listening to my pub conversation! A few days ago, we were discussing how several WWII aircraft could be useful in this war, like Hurricanes to tackle drones and Mosquitos, with their low radar profile, to raid Russian oil installations. Those 4x 20mm cannon would make short wotk of a row of oil tanks while the SAM's would hardly get a fix on them. Come to think of it, a Sopwith Camel might be even better for drones, slow and agile
@lorenzcassidy3960
@lorenzcassidy3960 Ай бұрын
"...while the SAM's would hardly get a fix on them." Modern SHORAD and MANPAD systems can *easily* get a fix on WWII era aircrafts. Even a vintage ZSU-23-4 Shilka would eat an Hurricane or a Mosquito for breakfast. This is a no-go unless you have 100% certainty that the enemy has NO anti-aircraft assets in the area.
@harveybrown37
@harveybrown37 Ай бұрын
​@@lorenzcassidy3960Given that the Mosquito usually flew as low as possible I imagine it could get there ok but be shot down on the way back by Migs.
@user-ui8jt6cx2k
@user-ui8jt6cx2k Ай бұрын
Different problems form different solutions. Bi-Plane and old war planes with ground coordination are very good for drone hunting, and you are correct with the Sopwith Camel 2/3-wing-planes provide an incredible lift, in a very small volume, the minimum stall speed is exceptionally low. As a front line fighter I would suggest not using these, as a fighter for dropping ukrainian glide bombs on russian positions I'm confident to see these in the next 6-8 months. Getting a fix on them -> MANPADs use IR-tracking and constrast UV-tracking, and this airplane is exceptionally dense, slow and easy to track. For radar reconaisance the biplanes wings should be made out of cloth (old style) and strings should be made from plastics in contrast to steel strings in the old days. But what we know of some positions on the front is that both troops lack MANPADs and frontline SHORAD like Pantsir and FLAK and so on .. are not at the frontline but guarding the rear and supply routes, and Ukraine has made it a habbit of decimating these systems, as they are the most important threat to F-16 used in a ground support role: So yes given the lack of MANPADs it would be an interesting gamble to have WW1 style bombers operating near the front.
@DavidMotion-uv2pu
@DavidMotion-uv2pu Ай бұрын
The use of low speed trainers to take out drones is sensible, any country with this kind of aircraft spare. Should donate them to Ukraine. If they have machine guns or auto cannons even better. Argentina had some. But they might have all been blown up by the SAS.
@lesliehart
@lesliehart Ай бұрын
probably parked up at Stanley Airport
@bremnersghost948
@bremnersghost948 Ай бұрын
Pucaras on Pebble Island.
@mickle-cornu2374
@mickle-cornu2374 Ай бұрын
we bought two of them back from the Falkland Islands in a museum in perfect condition
@user-vg9ku1lg3b
@user-vg9ku1lg3b Ай бұрын
Ооо, знакомый самолет! Вижу его в небе довольно часто ♥️
@a13Banger
@a13Banger Ай бұрын
Damn I love this channel
@suchomimus9921
@suchomimus9921 Ай бұрын
cheers
@GlideYNRG
@GlideYNRG Ай бұрын
Hmmm. Yak tail gunner anyone?
@rocroc
@rocroc Ай бұрын
Hazardous duty pay:-)
@Hoaxer51
@Hoaxer51 Ай бұрын
No thanks!
@MyFiddlePlayer
@MyFiddlePlayer Ай бұрын
@@rocroc At the moment, the drones can't shoot back, so it's not so dangerous. I'd be more worried about friendly fire (as in, you are going after a Shahed, and someone on the ground is going after the same target at the same time).
@lorenzcassidy3960
@lorenzcassidy3960 Ай бұрын
@@MyFiddlePlayer Also, trying to shoot down a Shahed at close range can definitely ruin your day if the darn thing decides to detonate.
@gregculverwell
@gregculverwell Ай бұрын
At the beginning of ww1 they used to shoot at each other with handguns. By all accounts it was very ineffective, however the drone can't take evasive action.
@jrrarglblarg9241
@jrrarglblarg9241 Ай бұрын
“Drone with a Glock” hasn’t been seen in combat yet, but that’s on my BINGO cards too now. Thanks.
@shawnr771
@shawnr771 Ай бұрын
​@@jrrarglblarg9241However a drone with a claymore has.
@fahey5719
@fahey5719 Ай бұрын
Hand held guns hit nothing, that's why they fixed machine guns to airframes and aimed using the whole plane
@Fubar2024
@Fubar2024 Ай бұрын
Thank you! 💪💪🇺🇦💪💪💛💙
@LafayetteCCurtis
@LafayetteCCurtis Ай бұрын
I'm actually surprised that it took Ukraine this long. Brazil has been promoting the Super Tucano as a helicopter killer for years, and more recently as a drone-hunting aircraft. A modified trainer with a fire-control radar pod under one wing connected to a gun pod under the other could be a pretty good platform for this kind of job. One of the European ships in Operation Aspides (French, maybe?) also found a helicopted door gun to be a very effective weapon against slower types of kamikaze drones.
@jonathanbuzzard1376
@jonathanbuzzard1376 Ай бұрын
They have been trying to buy the Super Tucano but the the Bolsonaro administration blocked the sale.
@LafayetteCCurtis
@LafayetteCCurtis Ай бұрын
@@jonathanbuzzard1376 Note that I'm not suggesting the Super Tucano specifically, just bringing it up as an example of an aircraft with somewhat higher performance being explicitly marketed as a "drone killer." Higher-performance Cessnas and Beechcrafts would do just as well as long as they get the appropriate weaponry and targeting apparatus.
@mickle-cornu2374
@mickle-cornu2374 Ай бұрын
the Argentinian picara aircraft would be ideal for this situation
@13699111
@13699111 Ай бұрын
Thank you for the update
@protoculture289
@protoculture289 Ай бұрын
Ukraine has proven to be quite adaptive to the Russian threats
@tonyyarbray
@tonyyarbray Ай бұрын
when i read about this i figured they had armed them but someone 'riding shotgun' might be a easier way to do it with these recon drones flying around maybe others types.. always seemed like small planes and small helis could be used to drone hunt away from the front would like to see a drone kitted up to hunt other drones...the U.S. should send them some of the gun pod armed variants of the t6 trainers we have a bunch just lying around but still think something like a little bird with door gunners on either side would make a great drone hunter their are a great many of those or something similar available
@LongPeter
@LongPeter Ай бұрын
Piston powered, prop-driven, air to air combat with small arms. Fighting 21st century robots, sent by a nuclear power, with WW1 tactics. You must admit, this war has variety.
@jrrarglblarg9241
@jrrarglblarg9241 Ай бұрын
Ya know what flies even slower and is even more nimble in the air? “WW1 biplanes” have just been added to the BINGO card.
@gilde915
@gilde915 Ай бұрын
Naaaa...... but how about drones and use Microsoft Flight Simulator to control them
@annienayland45
@annienayland45 Ай бұрын
Have you ever seen the Yak biplane. One used to be stored on an airfield in the Midlands, and it is a very large plane.
@gilde915
@gilde915 Ай бұрын
@@annienayland45 you mean the transportplane...those are realy workhorses the sowjet version of the DC3
@LafayetteCCurtis
@LafayetteCCurtis Ай бұрын
WW1 biplanes are too slow to catch many of the one-way attack drones in use today and most of them also weren't particularlt easy to fly.
@jrrarglblarg9241
@jrrarglblarg9241 Ай бұрын
@@LafayetteCCurtis I wasn’t suggesting a one size fits all solution, I was predicting it will be tried, at least once. There are at least 28 unique sizes on the battlefield, including the high-speed triangles but not limited to them. The tactical capabilities of off-the-shelf commercial quad and octocopters are becoming strategically important. Countermeasures are required, including armed and loitering at low altitude or ready to take off from a short meadow. Biplanes are tactically interesting but unexplored. I predict someone will try it.
@claucom1969
@claucom1969 Ай бұрын
Como hacian los ingleses para perseguir a las V-1 durante la WW2, por lo visto los Ucranianos son muy astutos ..!!
@josedonizetidores5091
@josedonizetidores5091 Ай бұрын
the Texan A would be a good drone hunter
@HubertofLiege
@HubertofLiege Ай бұрын
Snoopy air wing
@joekerry2206
@joekerry2206 Ай бұрын
This is brilliant. The old Yak-52 has a top speed in level flight of 177mph. The Shahed 136 drone reportedly flies at 115mph. Time will tell as to handgun(?) vs drone but the Yak is clearly a good choice as performance goes. Perhaps night lighting would need consideration too.
@currawong60911368
@currawong60911368 Ай бұрын
Given the location, it begs the question where the Orlan-10 originated from.
@BrickTextures-hm1uy
@BrickTextures-hm1uy Ай бұрын
Occupied part of Kherson oblast (region). Usually.
@lucianpapuc1504
@lucianpapuc1504 Ай бұрын
and why did it deploy the parachute?
@beersmurff
@beersmurff Ай бұрын
@@lucianpapuc1504 Auto deplays it when damaged/dropping altitude too fast. In case it was on own side, it would be retrievable. Now the UA can get their hands on it and reprogram it or strip for parts. Dont question why Russians dont disable the chute in enemy territory :-)
@marcuswall3857
@marcuswall3857 Ай бұрын
A modern day take on Stalin's Night Witches.
@markc6714
@markc6714 Ай бұрын
Gee I thought getting seasick was rough..... Imagine being in the back of the yak trying to focus on a drone
@davidchristensen6908
@davidchristensen6908 Ай бұрын
In WWII the uk pilots flew up to the doodle bug drone Germany sent and used their wing and flip them. Maybe this will work on the Russian drones. Saving all the bullets from flying around
@Fr99763
@Fr99763 Ай бұрын
That Yak has a very nice sound
@Framo60
@Framo60 Ай бұрын
For me, there are very few aircraft engines that sound better than radial engines (actually only Rolls Royce or Packard Merlin engines). :-)
@ZeSgtSchultz
@ZeSgtSchultz Ай бұрын
The Yak 52 is basically a modern BB-1 as far as i can tell. Thats amazing
@JohnDoe-jd7oc
@JohnDoe-jd7oc Ай бұрын
Tks. Cda.
@brucebaxter6923
@brucebaxter6923 Ай бұрын
Pull!
@mochynddu723
@mochynddu723 Ай бұрын
Snoopy vs. the Red Baron style.
@Blackerer
@Blackerer Ай бұрын
Actually a good question: Why not build a couple of cheap (WWII level) fighters, or rather interceptors, that require less training to be flown, and equipped with a cannon? This could help with the price and training gap. They dont have to even get anywhere close to the frontlines.
@LafayetteCCurtis
@LafayetteCCurtis Ай бұрын
WW2 fighters wouldn't be that cheap if they were built today, especially if they'd have to be stuffed with all the extra avionics needed to make them legally flyable in most countries. High-performance reciprocating aero-engines aren't even in large-scale production anymore and high-performance turboprops can often cost more than turbojets capable of producing similar thrust. Modified trainers, by contrast, are made to be more economical and are probably better suited to the job of hunting propeller drones.
@shawnr771
@shawnr771 Ай бұрын
They are called A29 Air Cobras. They are not really cheap. But think P51 Mustang on steroids. Excellent plane, lots of hard points, excellent range.
@Blackerer
@Blackerer Ай бұрын
@@LafayetteCCurtis Thanks. This is interesting. The next option is interceptor drones with a cannon.
@Damathus
@Damathus Ай бұрын
If you mean using fighter planes the sort of a Mustang/ ME109 or newer ones then I thought exactly the same at the beginning when the Shahed threat emerged. However, apparently the debris of an exploding drone is very dangerous for these aircraft. That is why british fighters did not engage V1 "doodle bombs" in ww2 with their cannons but executed the risky maneuver of tipping the V1's wings over with their own wings (if that was considered less risky then shooting it, I guess shooting it was pretty damn risky). At least one Ukrainian SU27 was lost due to debris after shooting a Shaheed with short range missile shortly after the first Shaheeds arrived. BUT I have been thinking for a long time now about the fighter aircraft from ww2 which had rear facing machine guns. I am quite surprised we haven't seen sth like this in use so far. Smaller fighter bombers had upward facing guns and larger bombers downward facing guns, why not trying out both concepts in Ukraine?
@LafayetteCCurtis
@LafayetteCCurtis Ай бұрын
@@shawnr771 Even the Super Tucano might be a little to exquisite to do this kind of job cheaply. The base Tucano with gun pods would probably be more like it, or even a helicopter with a door gun.
@TheCynabal
@TheCynabal Ай бұрын
Pretty sure I read a similar story in an old Issue of Commando when I was a kid 😆
@ralfs.6479
@ralfs.6479 Ай бұрын
Reminds me a bit of how some German V1s (the first terror drones) were intercepted by inventive Spitfire pilots in WWII: instead of shooting them down, they simply hit them with a wingtip, whereupon the 'doodlebug's' gyrocompass system failed and the whole thing crashed.
@paulanderson3709
@paulanderson3709 Ай бұрын
.....and it doesn't take long to train a pilot but night time drones will be a problem.
@bobjohnbowles
@bobjohnbowles Ай бұрын
NVGs are a thing, but yes that is a step up in pilot training.
@toby9999
@toby9999 Ай бұрын
What's the deal with the parachute? I must be missing something.
@NemesisoftheGrandPoohbahputin
@NemesisoftheGrandPoohbahputin Ай бұрын
Some drones (not a drone expert) have a parachute pop out once they lose control. Some of these (most?) carry a warhead & even the russians don't need an out of control drone circling back.
@ChucksSEADnDEAD
@ChucksSEADnDEAD Ай бұрын
A lot of drones can't land conventionally and pop a chute to land vertically.
@TheFrewah
@TheFrewah Ай бұрын
I think the orcs can recall drones and make sure they land safely this way. Or maybe there’s an emergency button sh
@user-ui8jt6cx2k
@user-ui8jt6cx2k Ай бұрын
@@ChucksSEADnDEAD correct
@billytheweasel
@billytheweasel Ай бұрын
Need 100% communication so ground AA doesn’t hit it, it would seem.
@jtsinspain
@jtsinspain Ай бұрын
A similar job could be done with a Fieseler Storch, also incredibly manoeuvrable and able to land almost anywhere; problem is that there are not many of them. Antonov's first real plane was a copy of that, there could be a few of them lying about somewhere.
@DarkestAlice
@DarkestAlice Ай бұрын
Thank you, Suchomimus, for bringing the videos together! 🇺🇦 Перемоги і миру всім українцям! 🇺🇦
@alfretwell428
@alfretwell428 Ай бұрын
As these are military training aircraft, you may find that some are equipped with wing hard points to carry practice bombs etc. If this is the case the hard points could be modified to mount a gun or guns.
@julianprice1587
@julianprice1587 Ай бұрын
Fantastic! And even New Zealand has a dozen or so Yak 52 aircraft!
@shaneconnor86
@shaneconnor86 Ай бұрын
Yak 52 is a versatile relatively inexpensive aerobatic trainer; upgraded variants are in service with numerous European airforces (Wikipedia); they are often seen performing in airshows. Slava Ukraini 🇺🇦 from 🇦🇺
@everTriumph
@everTriumph Ай бұрын
Once popular as an aerobatic aircraft.
@pederb82
@pederb82 3 күн бұрын
Something interesting mentioned on press conference about Norwegian military build up. It was passed with 100% agreement in our parliament. That's an enormous build up for a little country like Norway. But what might be of interest to you guys is that NASAM have the capability that's not been mentioned to fire long medium AND long range munition and not just short range as Ukraine has gotten. Norway is developing 100% norwegian produced long range version of the munition now. I suspect Ukraine will want these ASAP and I'm sure Ukraine will get them as what better way to test them than to take out attacks incoming from Orks! It will be great to see these come into use. Im not sure that our military wanted this to be known, but one of the members of the defence comittee on our parliament splurged it at the press conferense, and you could see that some reacted to the revelation. But cat out of bag now! And that's good. :)
@angrydoggy9170
@angrydoggy9170 Ай бұрын
I’ve been wondering for a while now if planes like crop dusters could be useful with some modifications. They were used extensively and very successfully in the past.
@shawnr771
@shawnr771 Ай бұрын
They are. I do not know where you would find the information but it is happening.
@thesunexpress
@thesunexpress Ай бұрын
These aircraft also serve as trainers to build up flight hours among their many other uses.
@yes_head
@yes_head Ай бұрын
LOL, the *gunner in the back* is shooting down drones? This war really IS so 1916! 😅
@davidworsley7969
@davidworsley7969 Ай бұрын
Jolly good show Biggles!!
@anadin0612
@anadin0612 Ай бұрын
Thank you good sir
@christopherg2347
@christopherg2347 Ай бұрын
Propellar Aircraft have been making a comeback in the last 1-2 decades. Especially in the ground attack role. But I guess drone defense is another option. See "Why Propeller Aircraft Are Making a Military Comeback" by "Military Aviation History". The idea is that in a area where you hold air superiority to air supremacy and in a low intensity combat (insurgency, apparently drones), they work perfectly fine. They are cheaper to build, maintain, operate and don't need military airfields.
@shawnr771
@shawnr771 Ай бұрын
My favorite current one is the A29 Air Cobra.
@romanbrough
@romanbrough Ай бұрын
I have thought a year ago that 1930s or early WW2 fighters would be an economical, effective anti drone fIghter
@TheFrewah
@TheFrewah Ай бұрын
They may be too fast and have too powerful guns
@UnitedUA
@UnitedUA Ай бұрын
-Putin says he wants Alaska back. You can't even take Ukraine dude . . .😂 #Putin Fail Army!
@bosoerjadi2838
@bosoerjadi2838 Ай бұрын
Very reminiscent of the Second World War V-1 intercepts over Britain. And when the Yak's gunner runs out of ammo, the pilot could then resort to affempts at wing tipping. However, this approach only works when there aren't any Su-35's equipped with R-37s lurking at high altitude, few hundred kms away.
@simonwells5319
@simonwells5319 Ай бұрын
Great idea!
@johnstreet797
@johnstreet797 Ай бұрын
Yakolev made some interesting aircraft over the years.
@montanelas6716
@montanelas6716 Ай бұрын
You had fighters shooting down V-2 rockets in ww2 , 80 years later we are still doing it 💀
@leifvejby8023
@leifvejby8023 Ай бұрын
No, V-1 cruise missiles. V-2s went way over 4000 km/h.
@NemesisoftheGrandPoohbahputin
@NemesisoftheGrandPoohbahputin Ай бұрын
V-2?? I think you mean V-1 instead.
@Canofasahi
@Canofasahi Ай бұрын
@@leifvejby8023 Not during takeoff, although in my knowledge not a single V2 in flight was ever taken down, however allied pilots where actively searching for the launch installations, having said that a fully fuelled V2 at it's pad would make a serious explosion and the Germans had the nasty habit of launching them from or close to build up areas.
@leifvejby8023
@leifvejby8023 Ай бұрын
@@Canofasahi I've heard of a Mosquito pilot who had a go at a V-2 just as it cleared the launching pad, but he didn't score any hits, maybe for his own best.
@halfabee
@halfabee Ай бұрын
V2 was the rocket V1 was the buzz bomb.
@alfnoakes392
@alfnoakes392 Ай бұрын
Several of these aircraft here in NZ. Sort of 'entry-level' Warbird cost-wise. Someone please get onto writing a Flight Simulator bolt-on for this 😃
@PhilAndOr
@PhilAndOr Ай бұрын
Yak - also in Command and Conquer: Red Alert as soviet anti-infantry unit.
@gooseywhispers
@gooseywhispers Ай бұрын
oh yeah hah
@Count_Gustav
@Count_Gustav Ай бұрын
YaK attack plane, still remember of those.
@LafayetteCCurtis
@LafayetteCCurtis Ай бұрын
That one's an actual fighter, though, probably modelled on the Yak-3 or Yak-9.
@Grumpyoldman037
@Grumpyoldman037 Ай бұрын
Very interesting!
@ricardokowalski1579
@ricardokowalski1579 Ай бұрын
"air superiority" has become wierd
@MurrayDagostino
@MurrayDagostino Ай бұрын
I get 2nd ww vibes here, prop fighters going at it. Old-school style.
@mikenelson8786
@mikenelson8786 Ай бұрын
An ace in the making
@Roger_Gustafsson
@Roger_Gustafsson Ай бұрын
It's like we're going back in time. Trenches, propeller planes, artillery warfare. What's next?
@scotts.2624
@scotts.2624 Ай бұрын
They could drop tangling lines in front of the drones.
@DougguoD
@DougguoD Ай бұрын
0:54 Are they using pistols like in WW1 👀
@hannisateur
@hannisateur Ай бұрын
Proof that anyone who claims Ukraine does not want to use older airframes is a traitor and a liar.
@glennmitchell9107
@glennmitchell9107 Ай бұрын
Hardly a novel tactic. The British used fighters to down V1 rockets in WWII. The V1s were the original armed drone.
@mesyze
@mesyze Ай бұрын
well I had no doubt some1 else had the same question I had for such a long time. Finally they got it into action. Thing is whats the risk of the plane getting into air without getting shot down (air countermeasures and so on)
@AP-RSI
@AP-RSI Ай бұрын
Why don't they use electronic anti-drone weapons from the airplane?
@robertblack9381
@robertblack9381 Ай бұрын
Could be any number of reasons- too heavy, too complex to integrate with the yak, too expensive to risk going down in a training accident, lack of units to deploy, ineffective in the air compared to the ground
@user-ui8jt6cx2k
@user-ui8jt6cx2k Ай бұрын
1.) The drone has a certain level of independence (way points, return to home etc..), so only the backchannel could perhaps be jammed, to actually jam the internal electronics is even more challenging and does not really work well with the "civil-tech" DJI ones. 2.) Also EW needs a certain amount of electric power, because a jammer is in princip "just" a radio transmitter 3.) Higher transmitting power is detrimental for pilots, so you need a faraday cage to protect the crew from RF-burns -> RF-burns the reason why you should not try to dry your cat in the microwave.
@dsfs17987
@dsfs17987 Ай бұрын
@@robertblack9381 EW is first thing that came to mind when the Orlan was forced to pop its chute, I very much doubt hitting UAVs is anything but easy from that Yak, flyby and close range EW attack (should be more effective at same power level in air than couple hundred meters from ground) seems much more plausible, and there is no integration, it is basically a radio jammer that scrambles Orlans coms and confuses it so it panics and goes into emergency landing mode
@AP-RSI
@AP-RSI Ай бұрын
@@user-ui8jt6cx2k Good point!
@user-dz8zk4bf2i
@user-dz8zk4bf2i Ай бұрын
@@user-ui8jt6cx2k Ground laser, maybe.
@antskilu1354
@antskilu1354 Ай бұрын
Maybe combo of sports pilot and sports shooter ,smaller drone they can throw a fishing net like in gladiators
@elricofarmer1561
@elricofarmer1561 Ай бұрын
Ukraine should have had several dozen turboprops already fully armed in support rolls. The modern turboprops with missiles and guns along with modern avionics and radar could be supporting front line troops vs helicopters. They can fly fast and turn on a dime compared to a jet. Get more of them headed to Ukraine asap as the flight cost is cheaper than jets as well.
@KirsiVackelin
@KirsiVackelin Ай бұрын
Just brilliant, great ingenuity. I suppose flying a trainer plane does not require ja jet pilot training. And using a gun that isn't mounted on the airframe itself gives flexibilty. IIRC there is a US or was it Brazilian made crop duster plane with a turboprop engine--I saw a video about it a while ago--that could be something useful for Ukraine to use. Thumbs up!
Yak 52 snaproll on takeoff!
1:25
Extreme Aviation Iceland
Рет қаралды 140 М.
$10,000 Every Day You Survive In The Wilderness
26:44
MrBeast
Рет қаралды 101 МЛН
Who’s more flexible:💖 or 💚? @milanaroller
00:14
Diana Belitskay
Рет қаралды 18 МЛН
T-90M Destroyed and Another Damaged
2:49
Suchomimus
Рет қаралды 56 М.
FPV-DRON PROTECTS UKRAINIAN STORM FIGHTERS. FPV infantry support with drop from Battalion K-2.
33:08
Батальйон К-2 54 ОМБр
Рет қаралды 649 М.
Marine Drones Sink Project 498 Saturn Tug Boat in Crimea!
8:29
Suchomimus
Рет қаралды 75 М.
DST | The Joint Direct Attack Munition - Extended Range (JDAM-ER) | Andrew Snowden
1:36
Defence Science and Technology Group
Рет қаралды 84 М.
Ukrainian Drone Strike on Novoshakhtinsk Oil Refinery in Rostov!
1:41
M2 Bradley Destroys T-80BV With TOW Missile! Perfect Ambush
2:16
$10,000 Every Day You Survive In The Wilderness
26:44
MrBeast
Рет қаралды 101 МЛН