You were lucky, not saved. Sadly women are not protected by this more than luck, ie a 50/50 chance.

Fair point. But I take 8-10 hours to research every video so whatever I am saying is evidence based and accurate unlike many online creators how just spout their personal opinions.

Agree. Something suspiciously unilateral going on here that smells like medical authoritarianism.

This was me. I've got a longer video on lobular cancer coming soon.

@@DrLizORiordan Fail.

Exactly. See the studies below for yourself because super smart researchers, not idiots, are questioning mammograms harms too. Let's end the breast smashing, the trauma, the false negatives and positives, and the ionizing radiation of mammograms!! Now that there is better technology available, why wouldn't we? Let old school retired docs like Dr Liz go retire. We younger gens have real work to do on this! Let's do it now! We will have better options in our day. There is proof that mammograms cause harms that cannot be ignored any longer, especially now that younger women must get screened. If you are not aware of this or are calling others who bring this into quesiton bad names, shame on you! Isaac Allen et al. Risks of second primary cancers among 584,965 female and male breast cancer survivors in England: a 25-year retrospective cohort study, The Lancet Regional Health - Europe (2024). DOI: 10.1016/j.lanepe.2024.100903

Miglioretti DL, Lange J, van den Broek JJ, Lee CI, van Ravesteyn NT, Ritley D, Kerlikowske K, Fenton JJ, Melnikow J, de Koning HJ, Hubbard RA. Radiation-Induced Breast Cancer Incidence and Mortality From Digital Mammography Screening: A Modeling Study. Ann Intern Med. 2016 Feb 16;164(4):205-14. doi: 10.7326/M15-1241. Epub 2016 Jan 12. PMID: 26756460; PMCID: PMC4878445. Gøtzsche PC. Mammography screening is harmful and should be abandoned. J R Soc Med. 2015 Sep;108(9):341-5. doi: 10.1177/0141076815602452. PMID: 26359135; PMCID: PMC4582264

Yeom YK, Chae EY, Kim HH, Cha JH, Shin HJ, Choi WJ. Screening mammography for second breast cancers in women with history of early-stage breast cancer: factors and causes associated with non-detection. BMC Med Imaging. 2019 Jan 5;19(1):2. doi: 10.1186/s12880-018-0303-3. PMID: 30611228; PMCID: PMC6321714. 
Furthermore, the introduction of diffusion-weighted MRI (DWI) has increased the potential for the detection of malignancies throughout the body.5 5. Lambregts DM, Maas M, Cappendijk VC, Prompers LM, Mottaghy FM, Beets GL, et al. Whole-body diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging: Current evidence in oncology and potential role in colorectal cancer staging. Eur J Cancer. 2011;47:2107-16. [PubMed] [Google Scholar] The added value of whole-body magnetic resonance imaging in the management of patients with advanced breast cancer. journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0205251 In conclusion, WB-MRI disclosed PD earlier than the control examination (CT-CAP or PET/CT), and it was responsible alone for 50% of all changes in treatment. journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0205251

Don't listen to her on these points saying MRI or Sofia ABUS 3D can't be used. There is evidence that DW-MRI can work for this, it is already working for men with prostate cancer. They just need to get it working for women and women need to stand up and demand contrast-free and ionizing radiation free screening options like DW-MRI. We know that women with dense breasts get nothing from mammograms, why are we exposing these women to this toxic and traumatizing scan that does nothing for them? Until she addresses this question, she is not my doctor. Spread the word, women globally need to ask for DW-MRI. WB-DW-MRI should be at every cancer center for annual whole body cancer screenings for all. Skip these cheap toxic scans like mammograms that miss half the cancers they are there to find and expose us to unneeded radiotoxicity.

BEWARE Dr. liz is outdated, harmful and backwards on thisi topic and has not done the research. Buyer beware on this video. After all, a whole county like Switzerland can't be wrong. Why is Mammography Screening Being Abolished in Supersmart and Future Thinking Switzerland? They did the research. Mammograms don't work. The data is really clear on this. False positives, false negatives and other harms. Learn more: www.mindfulwellnessmedicalthermography.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/02/WhyMammographyScreeninisbeingAbolishedinSwitzerland.pdf #mammogramsareoutdated #mammograms #mammogramsdontmatter #endmammogramharms Read more: prolifehc.com/post/Switzerland039s-Controversial-Decision-Banning-Mammograms

You are so welcome

@@DrLizORiordan So dissapointed in you Dr. Liz. You are utterly outdated and backward on this. I will unfollow you now. There is literally no reason for mammograms to continue. They don't work for women with dense breasts and are exposing women to trauma and toxicity for literally no reason. there is better technology already available. Men are already using ti for prostate cancer. It is called diffusion-weighted MRI. Why wouldn't you even mention this? END MAMMOGRAM HARMS. Anyone who doesn't get this should not be followed on any channels. Dr. Liz is outdated and behind the times and offering very bad advice. UNSUB NOW!!!! I AM and I am telling all my groups and BC support groups that she is not to be followed, some of my groups are in the tens of thousands. We won't be sold lies from this kind of idiot influencer!

@@DrLizORiordan You are spreading idiotic nonsense and then patting yourself on the back for it. How do you sleep at night?

Me too. I'd been on a screening program for family related risk for 20 YEARS! My lobular cell carcinoma was missed by mammogram, ultrasound, MRI with contrast and manual examination. No-one EVER told me about mammogram limitations until was too late, then it was "oh yes ...". It had spread to 16 out of 8 nodes and I'm on the downhill run with Stage 4 widespread bony mets. I had the unaffected breast removed too because, excuse me if I didn't trust it's 'normal' mammogram result. 😡

This makes me so sad. I also went YEARS with undetected ILC (3D Mammos for 20 years!) under the watchful eye of my doctors who knew I had a strong family history. I feel so let down by the professionals who were meant to help guide and protect me. I wonder if I will ever really come to terms with it all.

Yes absolutely I feel badly let down I was told nonchalantly that the mammogram would spot anything and not to worry i also wish i had known about mammogram limitations and it would have been a help to be made aware about the subtype that likes to hide so i could have avoided all this unnecessary suffering and i never even knew the word lobular before all this and was given a false sense of security, feel like an idiot

@@christinaxj absolutely. Her downplaying the utter uselessness of testing that can miss 10-15% of breast dancer is more than disappointing.

Ask a real expert, not an online influencer dr who shouts her ignorant bias to the world while patting herself on the back or giving backward outdated advice while calling others bad names like "idiots." Be ware of who you follow.

Sadly mammogram & ultrasound didn’t pick up the lobular breast cancer before being diagnosed with stage 4 metastatic cancer. Happy to say it didn’t hurt at all & I too have/had dense breasts. PS the cancer fully regressed in my breast but it had already done the damage.

we don't cut open the cancer. We feel for it and then remove it with a rim of normal tissue all the way around it. We don't look at the rest of the breast tissue as the mammograms and USS have told us where the cancer is

this is the problem - they are sneaky. Even MRIs can miss them - my 13cm lobular cancer was missed on every MRI.We don't have a more accurate way of screening for them yet

Thank you Liz for posting this video. Always so informative. I know mammograms and US don’t find all breast cancer as this happened to me personally with a second lump being missed after chemo and lumpectomy. My surgeon thought there might be something else and a second op for mastectomy showed DCIS was there. This concerns me in the future as I worry about it being missed again on my other breast. I know mammos are the first line of scanning, but is there any other scan you can recommend if we are prepared to pay privately for it such as MRI?

They don’t want to do a double mastectomy on a healthy breast but lobular could infiltrate my other breast and again not be detected

Why is Mammography Screening Being Abolished in Supersmart and Future Thinking Switzerland? They did the research. Mammograms don't work. The data is really clear on this. False positives, false negatives and other harms. Learn more: www.mindfulwellnessmedicalthermography.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/02/WhyMammographyScreeninisbeingAbolishedinSwitzerland.pdf #mammogramsareoutdated #mammograms #mammogramsdontmatter #endmammogramharms Read more: prolifehc.com/post/Switzerland039s-Controversial-Decision-Banning-Mammograms

Can you tell me what you mean?

@@DrLizORiordan If you are unaware of the harms of mammography why are you doing this video and calling others who are aware of the harms bad names? Are you really that unaware? If so, you are no expert.

I’m sorry but I can’t give personal medical advice

Mammograms are nowhere near as harmful as some integrative influencers are making them out to be. They do save lives and it is dangerous when women are being fed false info and deciding not to have them.

@@DrLizORiordan Not so. No need to polarize this and call people names like idiots becuase they acknolwedge the harms you want to gloss over. We will have better technology for this soon. ABUS 3D ultrasound and DW-MRI is in progress in the US and it will make mammograms obsolete very soon. This should be where the discussion is. Not on denying harms and name calling. What is wrong with you? Didn't you take an oath to do no harm? How is name calling and bullying ding no harm?

Secondary risks from cancer treatment and scans and screening are real. Scans and treatment for cancer cause more cancer. It doesn't have to be this way. Doctors took an oath to do no harm. You need to do better by us than run your standard lines. What we need is for you to advocate for b etter technollogy for us, rather than push outdated, harmful tech on us like mammograms.

Agree. This is the worst Dr. Liz video yet. Completely conventional harms are continued by just this kind of nonsense failing to question itself why calling others who do question it bad names. She exhibits verbal abuse and she carries on with her poor judgement. Not a prescription to follow her I am afraid.

@@sakurasatori9736 100% agree. And there is so much better for us. Why doesn't Dr. Liz tell us the better technology that is available to us already like DW-MRI, ABUS ultrasound, or QT Imaging. Is she perhaps the unaware idiot on this that she is calling others.

DW MRi is being trialled to look at dense breasts but there is not enough evidence to show that it works for breast screening and save lives. It’s the same for QT.

Feel free to unfollow me if you don’t like what I say

​@@DrLizORiordan DW-MRI tech is coming soon and women need to know this. Men already have it for prostate cancer. And you neglect to discuss the need for this new tech ASAP. Mammogram harms are real. Calling others who have suffered for this idiots is beneath us all. Additionally, you completely leave any discussion of these harms out of your white wash here. It is known that mamogram screenings do not improve early detection - the data shows it. Mammograms don't work and they don't work for dense breasts. Ask Olivia Munn. Your take here is full of just Disgusting OVERSIGHTS. Women need better than mammogram pushers. We need the new tech and we need it now. The fact that you fail to address mammograms harms and the new technology coming out soon is really poor judgement. I have unfollowed you and will also share with others that you are not a sharp reporter on matter critical to the BC community worldwide or when it comes to technological advancements. This is a cricital failure in your discussion here to discuss what cumulative radiation exposures look like now that younger and younger women will need screened. Appalling oversight. Just appalingly bad.

Wow the name calling from this so-called influencer Dr is such a red flag for me too. Maybe she is the "idiot" (her words not mine) following conventional harms. ​ If you have to call names and and aggress on others to make your point, you are a bully nothing more.

@grantcommittee241 Check your neck, are you a bullying sociopathic vampire?