Un-Folding a Quadcopter to Increase Efficiency

Un-Folding a Quadcopter to Increase Efficiency - Part 1

Рет қаралды 535,189

Күн бұрын

Thanks to PCBWay for sponsoring this video--check out their website for an instant quote on custom PCBs, 3D printing, or even CNC machined parts: www.pcbway.com/?from=Nicholas
If you take a large, efficient wing and fold it up into a box, you can turn it into a quadcopter. This sounds kind of silly, but I promise there’s some distinct benefits to controllability in hover, and efficiency in forward flight.
Patreon: / nicholasrehm
How a tailsitter transition works: • Taming the Tail-Sitter...
Can wingtip-mounted motors improve efficiency?: • Can Wingtip Motors Imp...
Peter’s mini quadrotor biplane: • Chasing the VTOL Tail-...
Tail-sitter VTOL designs are a hilariously simple approach to the challenges of mashing an airplane and a helicopter together. Just make a flying wing take off from its tail and pitch over 90 degrees into forward flight. But to improve the efficiency of forward flight generally means to degrade the controllability in hover, since increasing the size of your wing also increases the amount of surface area that can be blown around by the wind. For tailsitters, forward flight efficiency and hover controllability have always been in direct conflict. This design is my attempt at remedying this classic tradeoff, to see just how big of a wing we can turn into a tailsitter. Folding it up allows for motors to be placed in each corner like a quadcopter, dramatically improving control authority, while reducing the wind-facing surface area in hover. If you found this video interesting and want to follow along as we inch closer into forward flight, don’t forget to subscribe!
Intro: 00:00
Design Overview: 00:57
The Build: 03:25
First Flights: 05:15
Forward Flight Game Plan: 07:14
Transition Testing: 08:00
Conclusions: 09:56
#FoldWing #VTOL

Пікірлер: 971

@matthewthomsondev 6 ай бұрын

That moving X-ray overlay of the 3d design at 2:22 🔥

@NicholasRehm 6 ай бұрын

Thanks for noticing 😃

@halfeld 6 ай бұрын

Oh yeah

@alienbeef0421 6 ай бұрын

Real lit indeed

@halfeld 6 ай бұрын

I had a little bit too much fun doing some video transitions: kzfaq.info/get/bejne/q96Sa6R0vNqom30.htmlsi=BhoITlYh0DR6NczF&t=50 (similar project, btw.) Next time, an X-ray overlay. Great idea.

@EldariusGG 6 ай бұрын

Earned my sub instantly

@alexrogall4543 2 ай бұрын

So where is part two. Im wanting more

@sjbr101 18 күн бұрын

After 5 months I'm guessing this channel is dead 💀☠️

@1dK628 8 күн бұрын

Stroke

@theserialinventor 6 ай бұрын

The oscillations are due to the polyhedral on the wing. You're ending up in a Dutch roll situation. You might want to try unfolding further before pitching over for forward flight. Another option to consider is a Z shape instead of a U.

@richardm.newlands2417 6 ай бұрын

Yup, I concur. And all that mass at the wingtips wobbling around is probably making it worse. Still, damn impressive!

@NelsonBrown 6 ай бұрын

I'm thinking he needs to dampen yaw oscillations with a control loop using differential thrust from the tip motors. The lack of vertical tail and huge dihedral make this especially Dutch-rolly.

@NicholasRehm 6 ай бұрын

Might be that, combined with poorly tuned PID gains

@charleslambert3368 6 ай бұрын

i'm guessing it would be fine to crank the damping values up quite a bit since you don't need much agility during the transition

@seanyfpv 6 ай бұрын

it's effectively like having huge dihedral right? so there's a strong bias towards rolling back to center

@NatureSkyViews 6 ай бұрын

I'd love to see this design "fully unfolded"

@NicholasRehm 6 ай бұрын

Hopefully soon!

@ethanhermsey 6 ай бұрын

The geometry of the plane seems off. I think it would lack roll/rudder authority for such a thin wing without sweep.. unless the software is very good :p

@herp_derpingson 6 ай бұрын

* ba dum tss *

@teitgenengineering 6 ай бұрын

@@ethanhermseythat's why he designed his own flight computer

@nasser6692 6 ай бұрын

@@NicholasRehm I wish you success.

@sonodrome 6 ай бұрын

I can already imagine the full transition looking totally majestic! Really excited to see part 2, great work 👍💕

@NicholasRehm 6 ай бұрын

Thanks!!

@simedracing 25 күн бұрын

Any updates yet?

@thatwasinteresting3319 Ай бұрын

Guys like you here on KZfaq who are doing backyard/garage engineering give me great hope for the future. The things I see you do are amazing to me (a non engineer). I look forward to your next video and wish you great success in your future, but a guy as smart as you doesn't need luck. I am also impressed with the comments on this video too. Lot of seemingly smart helpful people out there.

@Brian-S 6 ай бұрын

Can't wait for part 2 this is quite possibly my favorite project of yours yet. Such an amazing awesome design

@AnakinSkyobiliviator 6 ай бұрын

With it being partially folded like that, it can't help but remind me a bit of Star Wars' V-19 starfighter! That aside, seems like a cool build!

@mscir 6 ай бұрын

Well done. I like hearing the details of 3d printing. I never heard of lightweight PLA before, good to know. Looking forward to episode 2.

@DanielKesslerer 6 ай бұрын

Wow. Good on you for being patient with the forward flight transition and taking the time to tune. Keep going!

@checkedoutchris 2 ай бұрын

Fantastic! Love this one. I've been redesigning some of my linear actuators and playing with load rating them a bit. I'm glad to see use of linear actuators in this sort of application. Very impressive use of torque and lever action over that long distance. I'm surprised (impressed) how your printed materials stood up to the forces they had to endure. Great job!!

@davemenheere8276 6 ай бұрын

have you thought about having the wings fold upward? You could then use a "simple" strap in tension to keep the wing in its flying configuration. Just realized you could take your existing drone and fly it upside down 🙂Nice project! Good luck!

@truejim 6 ай бұрын

I had the same thought: make the wings fold in the other direction, with a stop at the joint to take the load, rather than asking the actuator to take the load.

@GodmanchesterGoblin 6 ай бұрын

Great idea. I guess it will depend on whether there is a stability or software advantage in an anhedral versus dihedral configuration during the transition phase.

@truejim 6 ай бұрын

@@GodmanchesterGoblin Intuitively it seems this approach would make transition even less stable, with the center of mass now being above the center of lift. There might be ways to overcome that problem.

@GodmanchesterGoblin 6 ай бұрын

@@truejim Agreed - but software control can sometimes benefit from an inherently unstable system since the corrective actions may be more consistent across a range of situations.

@PiefacePete46 6 ай бұрын

@@truejim : That's the way I see it too. It might prove simpler to have a latch at the fully unfolded position. That is assuming there is a need for anything... if the linear actuator is not back-driveable, and it doesn't need to suck battery power to stay unfolded, I guess you would leave it alone.

@Pgr-pt5ep 6 ай бұрын

The best vtol+unfolding winged quadcopter I've see is the PteroDynamics X-P4 Transwing. Their design is ingenious, especially the transition.

@kentonian 6 ай бұрын

Was going to mention them, most promising design I’ve seen of a vtolwing

@ardaricus1566 6 ай бұрын

Yeah the twist is real nice, makes it you don't have to sit on the tail. I wonder how much the mechanism weighs, though... Also, lack of hover efficiency is a concern for them as well as for nicholas

@Pgr-pt5ep 6 ай бұрын

@@ardaricus1566 The PtroDynamics's transition genius is that fuselage stays flat regardless of flight mode, just like a V-22 osprey, but with the added quadcopter dynamics. And the folding joint is mechanically sound. Hover efficiency is not important as it's inherently inefficient anyway, hence the need for winged flight mode. Even so, the tilt in their quad-copter mode is maybe 5 degrees, so no reason it's much more inefficient that the standard quadcopter.

@augustbarnes6732 Ай бұрын

This thing looks straight outta Star Wars! Watching it transition for the first time blew my mind.

@jonesmatthew7511 6 ай бұрын

I have been thinking about this for years, bravo! I look forward to see how this further develops!

@cephalopogg 6 ай бұрын

This video is so well made and I love the design. Can’t wait for the next part!

@NicholasRehm 6 ай бұрын

Many thanks!

@bambitakesflight7345 6 ай бұрын

Mate, I have been a follower since the start, I fly professionally in the DCL racing league, me and the guys love how you've been furthering the hobby! Keep going!

@NicholasRehm 6 ай бұрын

That’s awesome, thanks!

@ProMayvn 6 ай бұрын

This is such a great video Nicholas! Really cool take on this problem. Your video format and information, like that about certain aerodynamic aspects of the design, add a lot. Keep it up!

@GoldBenderr 6 ай бұрын

Such a creative idea! Loved every part of the video including the smart fly testing and cant wait for part 2

@wearemany73 6 ай бұрын

That’s the most StarWars thing I’ve ever seen, love it! 😮

@NicholasRehm 6 ай бұрын

I find myself accidentally building Star Wars looking things a lot lately… haha

@I.no.ah.guy57 6 ай бұрын

Dude this is awesome, such a good idea and it looks like something from Star Wars. Theres so many folding ships they have. Cant wait to see this design optimized and flying well! And whatever else you think up!

@theiceisnice 5 ай бұрын

As far as Star Wars ships goes, this probably looks closest to an upside down "V-19 Torrent Starfighter".

@benmcreynolds8581 6 ай бұрын

I can't wait to see this with a much faster transition mechanism so you could be a lot more dynamic with this awesome build. Really creative craft!!

@alienbeef0421 Ай бұрын

damn bro went balls deep with this design he forgot to post another vid

@crystalclearwindowcleaning3458 6 ай бұрын

Your stuff is always so creative. And you do quality construction. Keep it up!

@NicholasRehm 6 ай бұрын

Appeciate it!

@3DPrintHangar_RC 6 ай бұрын

I can't even count the amount of times I said "WOW" in astonishment! You're brilliant my good sir. It's a pleasure to watch this process👌

@NicholasRehm 6 ай бұрын

Really appreciate the compliment, thanks!

@harrymills2770 Ай бұрын

Marvelous glimpse of a great engineer at work. Much respect.

@poretsmouthrunner 6 ай бұрын

Amazing attention to design and construction details and solutions. It's clear that you will take this concept to its highest level and determine its pros/cons. Looking forward to the next video!

@NicholasRehm 6 ай бұрын

Thanks!!

@marpheus1 6 ай бұрын

Not that you had problems with the wings buckling, but I wonder if is there any cons in folding the wings the other way. They wouldn't make it weird for landing, since it lands on it's "side" and could add a lot of strength to the joints, but I have no Idea if while half folded as a upside down V/U it would be less stable than a right side up V/U. If you could enlighten me about that, i'd appreciate it.

@NicholasRehm 6 ай бұрын

I actually considered that and agree it would probably make the joint much stronger when fully deployed! I figured the dihedral could help through the transition, so that's why I decided to fold them down rather than up

@toolbaggers 6 ай бұрын

@@NicholasRehm You can always just reverse the controls and fly 'inverted.'

@HonestAuntyElle 6 ай бұрын

@@toolbaggers That would make it difficult given the lift forces when in forward flight.

@oliverpolden 6 ай бұрын

Not sure such extreme anhedral would be a good idea. It would probably just flip over

@NTLBagpuss 5 ай бұрын

@@HonestAuntyElle would the lift forces actually help the wings open out into forward flight position? The issues I would see is folding back down to vertical flight you would be fighting against that lift.

@BRUXXUS 6 ай бұрын

Incredibly cool! The VTOL transition stuff is so fascinating and satisfying to me. :)

@NicholasRehm 6 ай бұрын

You came to the right place then!

@PeterTheVald 5 ай бұрын

What a delight. Thanks. Looking forward to part II.

@xartemis2147 6 ай бұрын

This seems very similar with the X-P4 Transwing project and it's awesome to see the difficulties face when doing such a project and made me appreciate so much more the idea

@paulogden7417 6 ай бұрын

This is a super cool project! Very excited to see the next video and hear how you smooth out the instability. Can this be done with SW only or will it take physical changes? CH change? A tail of some sort? Good luck!

@paulogden7417 6 ай бұрын

I have become intensely interested in transitioning EVTOL. This platform holds so much promise to create the new age of aviation where you can take off from your yard and fly hundreds of miles on electric power.

@NicholasRehm 6 ай бұрын

Thanks!! It will definitely be a software fix, but there’s some hardware tricks we can play with to make that process a little easier. I’m thinking some removable horizontal tails to temporarily improve longitudinal stability. The end goal is actually an unstable wing in forward flight, since those can be even more efficient. Kavin @thinkflight has played with this idea quite a bit

@dfgaJK 6 ай бұрын

@@NicholasRehm The whole concept of a VTOL, high aspect ratio, unstable wing is so appealing, it is the best of all worlds! I don't fully understand the advantage of having the center motors off in forward flight, I would have expected distributing the thrust across more motors would be more efficient. I guess with a decrease in tip motor speed there is a decrease in tip vortices reduction so maybe that is the tradeoff? Maybe you can explain more in the next part?

@AerialWaviator 6 ай бұрын

@@dfgaJK A wing requires ~1/3 the energy of an aircraft hovering on thrust alone to carry the same weight. Turning off motors reduces power, and increases flight time, efficiency. Folding props reduce drag. The other trick mentioned in the video is the propeller prop pitch is different between inner and outer motors. Inners are optimized to offer better hover performance, and the outers offer better fixed wing cruise performance.

@sethpolevoi4027 6 ай бұрын

Instead of having the wings fold up in a “U” shape, you could have them fold down in an “n” shape. This would make it stronger in the plane orientation because the bending forces would be fighting against a mechanical interference instead of the strength of the servos.

@YeshuaGod22 6 ай бұрын

glad someone said it!

@RanDStClair 6 ай бұрын

I have built and flown the N shape. It worked, sort of, but had some problems. When hovering close to the ground yaw was uncontrollable because any cross wind makes it spin like the cup wheel of an anemometer.

@AdamStephens 2 ай бұрын

Man, I can't wait to see it fully transition. Great video.

@sebcam9498 6 ай бұрын

Very nice work, lots of thinking involved fore sure

@DomanStuff2022 6 ай бұрын

I was waiting for this video, but, honestly I wasn't expecting that. Very interesting choices... I'm waiting for full forward flight, and... lots of performance data! 🙂 Also, Graupner makes quality folding L & R props form carbonfibre and glassfibre - I can recommend them.

@NicholasRehm 6 ай бұрын

Do you have link to any counter rotating sets? I can't find any in their catalog, maybe not looking hard enough

@DomanStuff2022 5 ай бұрын

@@NicholasRehm you will be better of contacting graupner and asking them for a reseller. I find them locally and never online. You're looking for CAM FOLDING PROP.

@janheuermann2174 6 ай бұрын

Nifty idea with the prop mounts, I might just shamelessly steal that for my own VTOL project. Can't wait to see the full transition! I'm also quite curious about your method of blending controllers on this. Good luck with the project:)

@NicholasRehm 6 ай бұрын

I basically copied my approach from my last video on tailsitter transitions to fade between flight modes. Unfortunately, I think that simplified approach needs some tweaking to work with a morphing wing

@janheuermann2174 6 ай бұрын

@@NicholasRehm Interesting, that was also a great video by the way. Did you also adjust the motor mixing basf on the position of the wing folds? I cound imagine the pitch authority will get smaller as the motors come closer to each other as looked on from the side. Or is the craft tilted far enough to be out of the stall regime where this becomes noticible?

@DMel2011 6 ай бұрын

The controller part of it is defintely a challenge as I found out from my folding wing tailsitter concept a while ago. It seemed like I had to switch to using quaaternions vs euler. Pterodyanmics concept solved that by not having to transition their IMU from vertical to horizontal.

@kentonian 6 ай бұрын

Great work and it’s very satisfying to see it transition. I think the thing that always comes back to bite tail sitters in the end is guesting conditions. Ultimately for large scale vtolwings I think just 4 motors on poles that rotate is the answer,

@yamondakawazuki8941 5 ай бұрын

Great idea, most importantly even greater execution! Well done, nice editing! Definitely earned a sub in one video:)

@joepopplewell680 6 ай бұрын

Reminds me of the Ptero Dynamics Transwing drone, but theirs has the entire wing rotate in a unique way. Would be interesting to see a comparison of the two ways of approaching the same problem.

@DinGuSco 6 ай бұрын

I thought the same... then thought this design might actually breach their patent as I believe its pretty comprehensive regarding the unfolding/rotation of complete wing assemblies when transitining from a VTOL to forward flight modes. Not sure if it would matter unless he is selling the design, but could be complicated if he makes money from the video on KZfaq

@dronedevices 6 ай бұрын

We also thought the same, although it's definitely infringement on Amazon's "In-flight reconfigurable hybrid unmanned aerial vehicle" US patent 9550567B1. We had a KZfaqr infringe on our patent and never got a response back. He only stopped replying to comments, but he can be held liable for any funding which is more likely the only goal.

@freddybell8328 6 ай бұрын

@@DinGuScoTrue. They seem pretty chill though. They're open to other people using their patent.

@DMel2011 6 ай бұрын

I think I can claim dibs on the folding wing concept 11 years ago for a DARPA’s Uavforge competition. kzfaq.info/get/bejne/p9-RarCJt5PWg2Q.htmlfeature=shared I couldn’t patent cause I worked for an aerospace company. Pterodynamics concept is different and better and glad to see its progress!

@nacorti 6 ай бұрын

Love watching your stuff! Stopped my entire morning to sit down with this video lol My guess is that during your transition, you're getting stalls at the tips of the wings and losing control authority from the aileron on the side of the stall. I'd venture that pitchAttitude + transitionWingDihedral > criticalAngleOfAttack. Combining those two angles obviously isn't a simple sum but I think you get my drift. Also, I bet that in a bank, the higher wing is stalling first, causing the bank to reverse, causing the other side to stall, and then you get into the observed oscillatory feedback loop Solution space I'd say is either a) redesign the wing to twist slightly as it gets closer to the tip to reduce AoA, or b) just slap some vortex generators on the outboard sections to increase the critical angle of attack. All in all though great video! Love seeing you draw inspiration from ThinkFlight, Tom Stanton, etc. Waiting eagerly for Pt 2!

@robinbennett5994 6 ай бұрын

That's a good point. There's probably some serious pitch/roll coupling going on with all that dihedral and no fin.

@Brandon_SoMD 6 ай бұрын

This might be on point. I did some intern work at NASA 35 years ago on stall triggering devices, to enable flight at very high angles of attack without losing control. We tested a number of things, including vortex generators, "bug splitters" (wedges of sheet metal sticking out the front of the wing surface), roughening strips (like, 40-grit sandpaper) to energize the flow at different positions on the leading edge and upper surface, drooped leading edge segments in front of the ailerons (to decrease the local AOA), wing twist, leading edge slats, and more. It's an art, as much as a science; it was a matter of playing around to find the best solution for a given design. It almost seems like the best answer is simply higher speed in the partially-transitioned configuration to quickly get past that stalled regime, and only then transition the wing fold the rest of the way. Creeping up on the transition at slower speed is going to make things worse, I think. USNTPS FTM-103 (I mentioned in a previous comment) has a good section on stall issues.

@NicholasRehm 6 ай бұрын

I’ll see if I can straighten it out in software, but some hardware tweaks like you suggested are definitely on the table

@nacorti 6 ай бұрын

@@NicholasRehm A potential starting point here kzfaq.info/get/bejne/oadheLGZ3bLVhKM.htmlsi=8Hok6ABoFGeW9CZr These guys have a similar AOA during transition, might be able to replicate their transition

@sbwew 6 ай бұрын

Great work and very inspiring. On my shop bench is my first attempt to incorporate your controller into a tailsitter. Looking forward to your next posts!

@NicholasRehm 6 ай бұрын

Sweet!!

@kerrykrishna 6 ай бұрын

This is pretty amazing Nicholas. Subscribed!

@fabianluethi03 6 ай бұрын

1:20 Just maker a circular wing so it is endless efficient xDD

@TheOriginalBlue62 6 ай бұрын

Very cool setup. Have you attempted any flights fully unfolded just to see how it handles as a flying wing without needing to risk a crash mid transition?

@optillian4182 5 ай бұрын

You make such magnificent flying machines.

@PeterSenna 6 ай бұрын

Awesome! Thanks for the video!

@HaloWolf102 6 ай бұрын

2:19 I loved this shot personally.

@bilalma1483 6 ай бұрын

Awesome! I'm working on tailsitter project myself for my PhD and I find inspiration in your videos

@NicholasRehm 6 ай бұрын

Sweet!

@claytonharting9899 6 ай бұрын

man this is like a professional discovery channel show

@ser2313 5 ай бұрын

Good job! The project has a place in life.

@ianmyles9025 6 ай бұрын

Love it. Great conclusion & clever design.

@mitu8281 6 ай бұрын

this is some brilliant work

@spladam3845 5 ай бұрын

Amazing project, your skills are impressive, hope to see this on the market in a couple of years.

@dodgygoose3054 6 ай бұрын

Looks amazing, looking forward to your advances.

@jimbotron8552 6 ай бұрын

gorgeous build

@FarmerFpv 5 ай бұрын

That is the gnarliest VTOL build I've seen. I think I pooped myself just watching it oscillate back into a hover.

@javierpatag3609 6 ай бұрын

Wonder of all these experiments and innovations in drone design will benefit future manned aircraft design. Please keep up the good work.

@theottoz2494 6 ай бұрын

Awesome video, First time viewer and I was incredibly impressed with the quality of your video, I liked, subscribed, and shared your video with a few people. You got a good laugh out of me with your commentary on almost wiping out the first time 😂 keep it up man 🤙

@NicholasRehm 6 ай бұрын

Many thanks!!

@TheTonester2312 6 ай бұрын

Very very cool. Love the idea, and execution!

@NicholasRehm 6 ай бұрын

Appreciate it!!

@TheTonester2312 6 ай бұрын

@@NicholasRehm no problem!! I look forward to seeing it's progression.

@hookedonhobbies9825 6 ай бұрын

Way cool! Loads of potential in the desing.

@CallMeSwal 6 ай бұрын

This is such a cool idea! Nice work!

@cloudpandarism2627 6 ай бұрын

as somebody who builds his own aircrafts to fly myself - you earned that sub! jesus the transition was so nice to watch

@GrimGX 6 ай бұрын

Really excited for part 2, great video!

@NicholasRehm 6 ай бұрын

Appreciate it!

@xianghe5368 6 ай бұрын

Great work! In the transition state, the control surfaces change from rudders only to V-tail then elevons. I'm not sure if the tilting angle is enough to determine the current state or if an airspeed sensor is a must.😁

@DavePetrillo 6 ай бұрын

Excellent video as always! Such a joy to watch!

@NicholasRehm 6 ай бұрын

Thanks Dave!

@execute56 5 ай бұрын

best thing I've seen on internet today, literally a master piece 🔥

@GR8SCOTT 6 ай бұрын

I love the idea behind this!!! Please keep it up!!!

@NicholasRehm 6 ай бұрын

Thanks, will do!

@AerialWaviator 6 ай бұрын

Such an amazing and challenging project. The recoveries from semi-transition back into hover mode are just amazing (and a scary) to watch. That you're able to recovery so well is an attestant to your skills and all the effort that have gone into developing dRehmFlight. My brain is twisting as I try to imagine how pitch is controlled/maintained as wings unfold. Wonder if had an elevator, or elevons on the inner wing would help? Such flight surfaces operate similar to flight to those on a tail sitter, reducing the complexity of the outer controls surfaces having a wide transition angles. (swapping between rudders/elevons as pitching, while moment forces from the motors also changes) The closest transitioning VTOL that tries similar unfolding transitions is the PteroDynamics Transwing. Its wings rotate and pivot the using a heavy complex mechanism. The dReamFlight folding quad wing VTOL is much simpler mechanically, but a more complex software challenge.

@kaspersorensen 6 ай бұрын

That is extremely cool! Can't wait to see the next video.

@sethburnsman 2 ай бұрын

Dude. I hope this gets enough views for it to become worth it for you to keep producing these videos. I keep waiting for an update. KZfaq keeps showing me this video. PART 2 PLEASE

@emmapantzar-karlsson1376 6 ай бұрын

This is so cool! Really enjoy seeing your work!

@NicholasRehm 6 ай бұрын

Appreciate it!!

@brighambaker3381 5 ай бұрын

Awesome design, and video!

@JeromeDemers 4 ай бұрын

The 3D transparent overlay over the footage is really nice!!

@NicholasRehm 3 ай бұрын

Thanks!!

@ltpinecone 6 ай бұрын

SUPER cool. Great video and such a cool project!

@NicholasRehm 6 ай бұрын

Appreciate it!!

@peterryseck 6 ай бұрын

Looks like Dutch roll! Awesome video

@ronaldglider 6 ай бұрын

I suggest to put the wing-hinges different from 90 degrees such to have the wings v-shape backward, like traditional flying wing designs - this will give much more stability for unfolded flying. To boot, you have have the propellers at same level when in drone configuration. This is a really cool project - good luck and load of success!

@chrisregister8021 6 ай бұрын

What an awesome project!

@ryanoberfield756 6 ай бұрын

you hit the nail on the head with this one! you should see if you could patent this. Good job!

@NicholasRehm 6 ай бұрын

Thanks!

@darkenblade986 6 ай бұрын

amazing channel. some of the coolest flight stuff i have ever seen.

@NicholasRehm 6 ай бұрын

Thanks!!

@ck2503 6 ай бұрын

Nice save @ 9:00. Can't wait for the next video.

@NicholasRehm 6 ай бұрын

Hah, thanks!

@nickbaddorf2673 6 ай бұрын

amazing as always! I need to look into making something like this!

@ColinHolloway70 6 ай бұрын

Very neat solution to counter-rotating folding props!

@PaulDominguez 6 ай бұрын

Awesome work🎉. Can't wait to see the next vid

@Mateus_Longo 6 ай бұрын

This was the best sponsor integration i've ever seen. And thanks for the video, very nice indeed

@NicholasRehm 6 ай бұрын

Me & @PCBWay appreciate that :)

@jameslmorehead 5 ай бұрын

I'm not an RC plane guy, but I do live in the R&D world. The printing issues you are having are not down to just settings, but it also looks like you are having a moisture issue. I would highly recommend a dryer for your filament, which also acts as a pre-heater. The AMS on the X1C has no active heating and relies on a consumable desiccant packet that is not used evenly. Since the desiccant does not move, the outer pellets get used up while the inner are blocked. There are kits to mod the AMS with a small heating element to maintain a constant temperature inside the AMS. On our X1C, I have not been allowed to mod the AMS to have the heater, so I've added 3D printed desiccant pods that screw together inside each spool. This has kept up with our high humidity very well. As a bonus, filling the pods only 3/4 the way full also mixes the pellets as the spool turns, allowing the pellets to be used evenly. I used a color changing pellet, so when they are close to their maximum absorption, the pods are placed on the build plate, or on a sheet spaced off the build plate. The build plate is then heated to bring the internal air temperature of the chamber to 60 to 80C to bake the spools. This releases the water that the pellets absorbed. Every so often during this process, the pods are spun and placed back on their other end. This moves the pellets around and allows the hot, humid air out. This this method, we have not had to change the desiccant in the AMS since the pods were installed. Since the AMS is not the end all, be all of filament delivery, we also have a stand alone filament drier hooked into the X1C between the AMS and the feed input. This was as simple as printing a Y adapter and fitting everything up with Capricorn tubing and quality fittings. This does mean you have to manually load the filament from the drier, but if you are only using the one filament, that's not a big deal. This does give fine control over the storage and preparation conditions of the filament prior to printing. This makes printing with stuff like PEEK, TPA, PC, and the light weight PLA much easier and more consistent. One last point on my already long rant is a controversial one. But, it's one I've found very useful for structural prints. The prints greatly benefit from a post print annealing cycle. I know over the past few years, people have tried various methods to strengthen parts by using a powered substance to pack in and around the print, then bake the print at or slightly above the plasticizing temperature. While this can work, I don't think the rick and effort is worth the reward. What most people don't understand is that the plastic does not instantly go from solid to goo when you jump a degree at some point. The softening is more of an exponential curve, as is the plastic's strength. So, you can heat the print to a temperature higher than its operating temperature, but well below its plasticizing temperature, and increase the strength of the print in both the X/Y and Z planes. Bambu Labs even has a couple white papers on this. Plus, you can do this in your printer. You just need a rigid plate placed over the build plate, with a space between them. You will need some trial to get the build plate temperature perfect for the chamber's air temperature. You are shooting for a chamber temperature half to 2/3 the "melting" temperature of the material. This is held for 6 to 12 hours to allow the discontinuous plastic to naturally bond through various internal forces. When properly done, you will have a less brittle, but stronger print. This does take a while, so if you are not wanting to tie up you printer this long, you can always opt to get a cheap lab grade oven and add a PID to it. You can get a new oven with a volume slightly greater than the build volume of the X1C and a PID system for under $200.

@dustcommander100 6 ай бұрын

Super impressive engineering!!!!!!!! That thing sounds SCARY!

@NicholasRehm 6 ай бұрын

Thanks! Yes it does lol

@ed4415 5 ай бұрын

Amazing work! Very impressive.

@i_Hally 6 ай бұрын

This is phenomenal! Very inspiring, id love to build this! Tho id probably tweak the design to look even more like the lambda t-4a shuttle. Great editing. Keen for part two!

@borysfurdas3425 5 ай бұрын

kzfaq.info/get/bejne/f5l0aJhqqbTFYGg.html

@chahatdeepsingh8473 6 ай бұрын

Amazing video, Nick!

@NicholasRehm 6 ай бұрын

Thanks and congrats on your defense!!

@KlingbergWingMkII 6 ай бұрын

Looks like a very strong dihedral effect during the transition. It goes into a rapid dutch roll. It needs much tighter yaw control during transition so the unfolding wingtips don't get a chance to generate a lot of rolling moment.

@NicholasRehm 6 ай бұрын

Agreed, need to tweak some of the flight controller gain staging to clean it up