Haha, you have a point

a n i m e n i m e

Hi tomoko

Tomoko moment

@@KokoroKatsura a n i m e n i m e m i n e m

I wish i could have been the one who found this... It would have been fun to sell out those spies to China/Russia/Iran. Then i could legit say "I caught a spy" 😄

Aliven't

"deleted"

game ended

Flatlined

So you need a 'feeling' to not be scammed

@@drowningin you just have to wiggle things around to see if everything is placed well

Or just dgaf Because the bank will refund it anyway

@@leprechaunbutreallyjustamidget could take a while and if it’s a debit card you could be out of your money for a while. If you always use a credit card especially if it’s a major credit card company you’ll be completely fine. Since most of them make it extremely easy to dispute and instantly lock the money from the disputed transaction from having to be paid, and stop charging any interest until it’s solved.

@@TheDoctorsGaming101 That's only because in that situation it's not your money that was stolen its the credit card company's money.

So you have to hide the entire screen now?

@@EmM-ko7mu Yes, but it is not as hard has you would think: and I find it definitely better than a physical keypad.

@@tHe0nLyNeXuS could they not just install those privacy screens that obscure the screen if you are viewing it from the side?

@@jmd489 They definitely could and probably have... I'll double check next time I stop at one (not much use for cash these days).

In Singapore all atm number pads come by default with a diffused glass that covers the pad. You need to lift it a bit and insert your hand inside and type the pin. So it hinders cameras, and it's very bulky that you can't slap a decoy pad over unless you physically saw the glass panel out

Like i could do a better job with 2 cans and miles of string

Why do think we are being taken out by socialism now? The cia, fbi, etc are too busy looking inward, by design.

In reality though the CIA is very effective but no intelligence agency is perfect.

All those government forces are meathead

@@colin4tor781 no tf you wouldn’t, you only ever hear about stories they want you to hear. Most OPs that (for example) topple governments aren’t widely reported. Ask the Russians what they think of the CIA, and who blew up their “well-guarded” gas pipeline😅

that's smart actually. i never thought of that

I've rubbed a big magnet over the stripe on my card because its so rarely used in my country. In fact, the first time I used the stripe was in a gift shop in York, where the cashier literally snatched my card off of me and started hurriedly rubbing the card down the side of the machine multiple times. It didn't work because of the aforementioned magnet abuse, and I'm kind of glad it didn't because they just seemed to be acting really weird and frantic with my card.

my exact thoughts i had to doublecheck whether or not my card even had a stripe on it i havent used the stripe once in the last 5 years i guess its magnet time

I do find at around 2 years the chip can become unreliable and the terminal will have you swipe if it fails too many times.

@@Aeduo the chip is a POS and wears out very easily

The CIA has A LOT of compartmentalization. I genuinely would not be surprised if the fact that it was a secure, life-or-death operation didn't get communicated.

Iranian here. kinda sad CIA failed them. after all they were fighting an extremely religious dictatorship in Iran. and I mean, they hosted several websites on 1 server .. like, common.. a 5 year old kid will be able to find out about it pretty easily

glowing

glowies are called glowies.. for a reason

😂😂

There are many, but none actually work, and a few risk charges just by using them. Nevermind looking sus usin em, people will think you planted it. Your CC company is liable for the loss from their terrible security, not you. Keep a couple accounts and live life.

The ATM might eat the card though

how would it know?

@@yoursleepparalysisdemon1828um basic detection of foreign software? the atm should do 1 thing when u insert the card and thats not store your info lol

how would you know......... jk

So rest your fingers on all buttons?

@@the_rippah shhhhhh

Aerogel stylus?

@@underjord. but will you actually start doing that each time?

I didn't know about that, thanks for the heads up!

That's a cool gadget! I wonder if the atm would try to eat it though. A lot of them pull the card all the way into an internal chamber and lock on to them. I hope that wouldn't break it in half or anything. The machine might need to see a valid signal first before it "ingests" the card, because if you put the card in the wrong way it often just doesn't go in all the way. I'd like to see someone experiment with that. It would be a nice accessory to carry around to check before you swipe.

@@Hypermanne so edgy 🙄🤡

@@Hypermanne Depends on which side you are.

​@@PrestigiousInferno the CIA is a fucking gang and you know it, overthrowing democratically elected leaders, trafficking drugs and murdering civilians.

@GorzaGunner sure if you believe in terrorism and execution for wanting a better life then it’s great.. id argue 99999.9% of people disagree however

Interesting, may I ask who you work for now? I'm guessing it's some form of law enforcement agency.

Well , I too would like to listen more.

When you were incarcerated, did law enforcement cut you a deal on your sentence in exchange for making use of your technical ability? I often hear that they tend to do that for those arrested under computer fraud charges.

i got wrapped for it a few years ago but since i was only a minor i got a slap on the wrist. my method was to have my phone face down on the counter recording at my cashier job. So when people handed me the piece id give it a quick flip for the phone and then swipe it. it was too ez 😂

Same thing happened to my dude Tyler. Some people are just too smart and it gets them into trouble.

Lol same I have to insert my non-working chip 3x before it lets me swipe

@@JakeAllen3 oh it never lets me swipe.

also your info on the deep insert is a little off, they've been out for years and have been found used in many places.

Teach me how to hack myself 😂

yea nowadays they are doing it through the ev chips on the card

@@MelaninMagdalene think.

They already have.

@@logmeindog can confirm

johntron iss CIA for sure

Glowing

@@dickdiamonds3410 he's not a. Fed just usefull dummy

A camera can often catch yoiur cards details written on it AND the pin. Keep em both covered or this offers no additional security. Not even gonna mention that contactless skimming has been a thing for over a decade, with devices available for purchase, and cheap!

NAB bank in australia has ATMs like this too, tap your card on the reader, except you don't give your card's pin, instead it sends a one-time code to your phone.

_Calls America a third world country_ 😂

Art of war tells us all spies are expendable

"federal agent made horrible website, this is what happened to his head"

"Committed suicide via two gunshots to the back of the head"

This needs to happen to the cia more often. Someone needs to teach them lessons.

See translation

Thanks : )

Why would it be in there if it didn't work?

@@crf80fdarkdays TBH I thought they removed it from the latest cards they sent out a few months ago

Yep, best way to pay for anything really. Debit cards are terrible. If you're paying interest, you're clearly doing something wrong. You wouldn't pay interest on debit, absolutely no reason you should credit regardless of APR.

Thanks!

Ive withdrawn from a teller once in my life it takes sooooo long lol

I was in the western states from Canada and was INCREDULOUS that the USA retail sector is and was two decades BEHIND Canada.

@@Dwightstjohn-fo8ki thats those states. They don't speak for the entire country. Hell, the place you were at probably doesn't speak for the rest state. There are places that haven't changed, but id argue that's a good thing. The move towards a cashless society is a dangerous and shortsighted one. Think about your truckers and the people who had their bank accounts frozen for supporting the "wrong" thing. I think the ones going backwards are us. So smart we're stupid.

You can skim via contactless to, or just by using the camera yourte already using to get pins to do OCR on the card. If someone can read it, anyone can.

@@nobodynoone2500 Yahh chip, this is why ATMs should switch to NFC. While chip is way more secure, it can still be cracked. NFC however is even better than chip, than chip is to the stripe. Currently NFC is uncrackable, but barely supported in stores and not at all by ATMs, and not all cards.

That's why it's more likely we'll all be on NFC by 2032 rather than chip, which is also pretty old and can be easily cracked.

Swiping is a bigger problem on Tinder.

Like it or not, you're safe because of them.

I really like this suggestion of gated funds. I believe it's best to have a card that you never use for any direct purchases, from which you transfer funds to another card or account. The original card can be immediately locked if there's somehow a breach in security, and using only that card to transfer funds to secondary cards and accounts means you aren't ever attaching your bank account info to anything. I had to cancel one of my cards not that long ago when someone across the other side of the country tried to use it for a big purchase and then going forward, I decided that gating my funds was appropriate.

@@tree-stuffer or just have an account without a card, keep only as much cash in the card you would be happy to lose etc. etc.

you people are out of your minds

@@alainportant6412 I'm genuinely curious what makes you think that way. Why does implementing easy but effective security solutions require being "out of mind"?

@@anteshell Because every single time you let tech people run wild, they're going to come up with some absurdly overengineered overkill for the most menial problem. Like the previous video "is you laptop's microphone spying on you?" where some kid came up with a mic data clock radio detector that you were supposed to fix on your laptop, when a simpler fix would have been to obfuscate your mic hole with glue or patafix or whatever;

At least in my bank, I could set up the limits to contactless payments. So, if the card gets stolen (and they don't have a PIN) then the worst that could happen is probably only a lost lunch. There's still a question of online payments and the magnetic stripe...

Why not just use a secondary online account to move money from? That's what I have. There is no money on the card linked to the main account until I move them over right before payment. Obviously have to be within the same bank, I only have ever had one bank and profile on it, so I don't know if other banks in Sweden or outside Sweden can work the same way. I would never have any money on the card-linked account, that would be a much bigger risk. But I know that for Sweden, there aren't much in the way of cash anymore, so we have nothing to pull out. The only goal of cash is to be able to count it, it has no value on its own, it's just paper. Digital money can be counted automatically, we still have ATMs but cash serve little use. It may be safer, presumably being able to track money automatically makes it safer, but I don't know how it all works and they aren't going to tell you because then you'd be given a set of instructions on how to fool it if you're seeking to do such a thing. Cash is just paper, so unless you can track that money precisely, it serves thieves more than it servers everyone else. I've only ever heard about cash being better..by criminals or wannabe criminals. Like in rap songs, where they may make fun of the "plastic" and that they have "paper". Even though it has no value on its own and if a society suddenly gets rid of the paper part, all that cash is valueless in that society. Just like if they got rid of the plastic part, or both if there is a new third one introduced. To be fair, I've not heard about either side anywhere else. Not a topic that gets a lot of attention, it just exists in the background of everyone's lives.

NFC is barely supported, it's nowhere near as supported as chip is now. Once it's as abundant as chip, swiping/strips will go away. NFC is barely supported at any shops I go to, and not a single ATM I've encountered supports NFC, just chip.

Contactless payments usually have limits, so if someone robs your card and tries to buy something too expensive, it will require the password. Same if someone tries to put a payment terminal close to your card (I mean, they would need to register the terminal first, which I doubt would be easy 😂).

I'm in Canada now and was incredulous the old tech being still used throughout the western USA. Very vulnerable. We've had chip cards for a decade and a half in full use: western US? about 20% today. Wha?

The thing is even though it’s not used primarily any more they still make the cards with the magnetic strike regardless if it’s a newer card or not. Mostly criminals will try the chip a few times and when that doesn’t work it allows you to use the magnetic strike they need to change security A lot and fast before it gets worse for us regular citizens. They also create anti skimmer atm I serte to break these type of skimmers and detect if inserted these are the best bet at the moment pertaining to this threat.

Do you notify authorities when you identify one to prevent someone falling prey to it

I don't want to turn this political or anything but people like to talk about how capitalism drives innovation, meanwhile we're all still using "ancient" technology such as this, because it costs money to switch to a new system, so why switch if the old system still (technically) works, plus an older smaller store probably can't afford to waste money like that, so you'll find several places that use a chip or phone payments, mostly big or newly built stores, but it's still not exactly common around here in the south.

@@vgamesx1 Capitalism drives currency to whoever can exploit the most. Regulated capitalism is better, but it's not a great system. There may be better systems, but you see the slow change within the current system..An entirely new system could take even longer and come with a lot of lower standards of living until it can be introduced. Or you get something like an attempt at a switch, but in the transitional period someone just gets power-hungry and it never happens. I guess the system driven by that power-hungry group could still be better, but it's unlikely as the system they were trying to transition to would've already been an improvement, more likely it will be a system benefiting the power-hungry group. I believe that was what the USSR would've come to, a transition to communism but it never happened and some other system took place by a power-hungry group. In unwritten history, it's probably happened many times. Impossible to choose the correct group to make the transition when you can't read minds. For the U.S. the issue is also that they love the rich and the ability to get rich, by presumably exploiting others like the most richest men have no doubt done to get to where they are. So introducing a system without exploitation would mean you can't get rich like that and that's probably one of the prime ways to get rich under regulated capitalism. If you can actually get around the power-hungry group that would no doubt want to take over in the transitional period to benefit themselves. I assume for the U.S., power-hungry groups are already in charge..So unless you off them, no transition will ever take place. Generational differences still occur and eventually "old men" will be those that were once the young "I hate the rich" people. Now they may be the old "I hate the rich" people and so change can take place because the exploitative generations are dead. But that also takes a long time..Decades. Or it will just continue, because who likes change and those that don't want to be exploitative may not be the ones that want to be politicians and such. Not EVERYONE in a generation will fall under the same "hate the rich" mindset, so those that don't will presumably be the ones that become politicians and the cycle continues. Again, can't vote for the correct group to make the improvements, because you can't read minds and if one person could, no one else can so they can't know that person is speaking the truth about these supposed liars. I don't get why you need so much money in the first place..The whole point of living isn't to work, is it? It does feel like that from how some humans talk about life. I'd think it's about passing time doing stuff you enjoy, so if you don't enjoy working you shouldn't be working. But apparently not. Of course most sane humans understand not everything you enjoy is what you should be allowed to enjoy. Torturing others, for example. I would list others, but no doubt the comment would be removed. Rules like we have now would still take place. Presumably you could make a lot more rules in capitalism, so exploitation isn't a possibility. But how would that happen when the system is run by people that want exploitation, cheapest labor for the cheapest prices. I wonder what sort of system they have in the works for when robots take over most jobs, if power-hungry individuals are in charge, I am guessing everyone else isn't going to be living under a benefiting system. Probably a future civil war waiting to happen. I'm not in the loop about all the anti-politics stuff, so I don't know about that stuff. That seems like a U.S. thing, "No politics" rules. I've asked people when I've been in Discord servers about it and they can't give an answer, because presumably it's based on preference of what sort of politics they don't want. Everything else is counted as unpolitical and is allowed, even if it is political. It's like "incel", from what I've gathered. It's just anyone you dislike or don't want to hear from. The internet has a way of diluting meanings until you end up with meaningless words. Don't like black wallpapers on your kitchen wall? Racism. That sort of dilution. Don't like white wallpapers on your kitchen wall? That's fine, can't be racist against whites, even though it's not even about humans. We're all wallists, black wallpapers suit better for kitchens due to potential spills and also because you may want to see in there and eat. White wallpapers should amplify the brightness in the room and it may be easier to see spills, if you ever end up spilling on the wall while eating. I don't eat in the kitchen, but the same is true for any room you eat in. If the wallpaper tolerates water, maybe white wallpaper is better. See it quickly, get rid of it quickly. Now it's a clean wallpaper again.

@@Herkan97 The best system I've seen is a greater mix of multiple systems where it fits, kinda like in the EU, so you still have your capitalism, but it's slightly better regulated and has stronger consumer protections, then you have some socialism aspects such as universal healthcare which splits the cost between everyone and simply makes it cheaper and more available for everyone, but in the US we tend to half-arse everything. You do make some good points though like "it will just continue, because who likes change and those that don't want to be exploitative may not be the ones that want to be politicians and such" very true, I have zero desire to be a public figure or have people hate me because I want to push for better living conditions, I have little to hold me here and therefore would much rather simply pack up and move than try to fix the place I currently live, but that isn't such an easy choice for many other people. Although the far bigger issue is corruption, even if you DO get actively involved, politician or not, good luck actually changing much of anything, even more so when any large company can just buy teams of lobbyists or lawyers to whittle your rights away, I mean just look at the state of right to repair, Louis Rossmann has been pushing it for 10 years now and has barely moved the needle, for the most part he's just kept attempts to make things even harder to repair at bay and only very recently finally got one win, it certainly makes you feel kinda hopeless to make any meaningful change unless you're rich or somebody with a massive influence like MrBeast.

Maybe I want them to try, Maybe my knives deserve a taste of blood...

Cash users don't use ATMs, they just go into the bank and ask the teller themselves (to minimize data theft.) My introverted ass would never be a cash-only user.

"Is a three letter government agency exempt from... laws" Bruh you know the answer to that one