Absent yourself from that school and think for yourself.

@@TheBlueScarecrow 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

​@@TheBlueScarecrow 😂😅😅

In these experiments how are the different forms of magnesium controlled for?

​@@arshpreetsinghplays99o in

yup the universal law of gravitation is only an IDEA!

​@@PeterPetenot to mention a helium balloon debunks the IDEA that mass attracts mass...

Absolutely, just a simple helium balloon discredits the entire theory of gravity. Helium or hydrogen weren't even discovered when Newton came up with his flawed theory of gravity 😲@@MathieusTheWalkingWitness

In these experiments how are the different forms of magnesium controlled for?

Lol Newton proposed "what goes up must come down" and "mass attracts mass" around 1666... Helium (has mass and NEVER goes down) was discovered in 1868... There is no universal law of gravity attraction, cause a simple gas such as helium, debunks that allegedly claimes "law"... i highly suggest you go watch Richard Feynman lecture about how laws of nature are discovered... "If it (your theory) disagrees with experiment, it (your theory) is wrong" --Richard Feynman Once again, dropping a helium balloon (both have mass) disagrees with the proposal of "mass attracts mass"...

Newtons The falling of the apple hinted at the force of attraction. And the thought of the attracter came after having seen the apple fallen on the ground. So the idea came to the mind that the earth has got the power of attraction. And when he saw the apple coming down, he realised the force of repulsion. And as a matter of fact any one of them is quite sufficient to bring it down. Then, what for two are required? IN “Hadayiq-un-Najum, it is said: If a bullet is fired on the equal level it will go in straight line, following its own nature. This hints at the force of repulsion.

It's difficult to show the effect of gravity on smaller objects else where because of opposing forces like gravitational pull from other objects, friction, air resistance and much more other counter acting forces. "That's why Cavendish suspended the balls on a horizontal bar to eliminate friction and put it in a wooden box to try and eliminate other forces as well. We haven't done this elsewhere because it's difficult to eliminate the other opposing forces perfectly.

@@noredem that's a nice explanation of the experiment, well done and thank you!

@@noredem SoCavendish'sExperimentCannotBeReplicated?ThisIsTheSameStuffLike:WeWentToTheMoonButNowWeCannotGoAnymore.

@@ovidius2000 That's erroneous and stupid. I myself in my physics degree did the Cavendish experiment, as every physics student does. It has been redone thousands if not millions of times. You can't go to the moon without a Saturn V, and we made only about 20 of them and used them all. Now we are building new rockets to do it again. Ditch your stupid handle and go study Science!!

Cavendish recognised that heat is a factor to cause his torsion balance to move. Imo nobody can achieve thermal equilibrium within their torsion balance because one cannot determine that the centre of a large lead ball is at the same temperature as the centre of a small lead ball. The same can be said with all other pieces of the apparatus especially if they are made with different materials, e.g. wood for the beam. Observing the torsion balance swing around slightly and putting the causation of that movement down to gravitational attraction is a great idea but one has to prove it is because of gravitational attraction and not just attraction of masses due to differentials in heat or perhaps some other unknown explanation. All Cavendish proved was that he had a vivid imagination!!! That's unsurprising though given he had lots of money, never married or had children, ate the same meal every day for most of his life and didn't like his portrait sketched or painted.

Explain more please

Alrighty

Lol Newton proposed "what goes up must come down" and "mass attracts mass" around 1666... Helium (has mass and NEVER goes down) was discovered in 1868... There is no universal law of gravity attraction, cause a simple gas such as helium, debunks that allegedly claimes "law"... i highly suggest you go watch Richard Feynman lecture about how laws of nature are discovered... "If it (your theory) disagrees with experiment, it (your theory) is wrong" --Richard Feynman Once again, dropping a helium balloon (both have mass) disagrees with the proposal of "mass attracts mass"...

Tt

Gravity=intermass action with planck scale space time warping. Unlike some kinds of electromagnetic radiation, Gravity doesn’t peek at you from behind other masses. Line of sight force only.

Space Time trampolin is NOT correct reason for gravitational motion we observe.

When you are falling there are no forces acting on you. Its not till something acts to push you away from your gravitationally determined path that you experience a force. The curve of space time is so severe near our planets surface that it requires 9.8m/s of force to push you away from the equilibrium state in that curved space. The curve of spacetime determines your path. Its really counter intuitive but we are like the fish who are trying to understand water. This leads to some stuff that is really weird when you first hear about it , like orbits being a strait line. They make a lot more sense after it sinks in for a while.

Lol Newton proposed "what goes up must come down" and "mass attracts mass" around 1666... Helium (has mass and NEVER goes down) was discovered in 1868... There is no universal law of gravity attraction, cause a simple gas such as helium, debunks that allegedly claimes "law"... i highly suggest you go watch Richard Feynman lecture about how laws of nature are discovered... "If it (your theory) disagrees with experiment, it (your theory) is wrong" --Richard Feynman Once again, dropping a helium balloon (both have mass) disagrees with the proposal of "mass attracts mass"...

Your English is good enough for me to understand approximately what you have in mind, but your question is incomplete. Think carefully about what information you know, and what information you want to find. Without knowing specifically what information is given, I can't help you.

No, because every time you change m1, then F also changes... and you thus end up with a new value for the equation.

Don’t forget planets above us, they also should impact any object on the Earth.

That's true for everyone. It's impossible to push yourself up. You push down on the Earth, and the Earth reflects the same push force back onto you. Since the Earth is so massive, it doesn't go anywhere from your push. But you do, from the Earth pushing back on you.

and when he farts, tornadoes are created. When he sneezes, cyclones! 🥴

No, gravity is not affected by magnetism. Magnetism and gravity can coexist in the same situation, and the forces would add up as vectors, but one does not affect the other.

En effet, la force gravitationnelle est infime à ce niveau.

2 separate vectors. Magnetism will ONLY affect magnetic objects and not gravity

😂🤔😅 right

​@@roshnionline381 zl

We can also prove it from a skyscraper

Because we don't think of our own daily work is so important or helpful 😁😁😁

Lol

🧐🤔 Carl Friedrich gauss?

I discard your opinion🤓

wrong newton was one of the intelligent human

Bs

Newton was a high ranking Freemason

I'm telling you

😂😂😂

😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂

Too cynical

Would have been easier if he had just eaten the apple and didn't think too much about it

Yeah, the Beauty of Physics.....

Bhaskaracharya described gravity in the context of a geocentric model, not a heliocentric one. He does not seem to have concluded that the Sun, Moon, etc. also have gravity, ascribing it as a property of the Earth. He did not create any mathematical description of how gravity works

What are you trying to say....?! Can you plz elaborate.....!!

Not only a theory, that's the thing how actually things work.... According to Newton's 2nd law of motion, F=Ma M=F/a Now, we know that Apple and Earth pulls each other with equal force. Earth Mass is much much greater than the mass of Apple. If the Mass is higher then the acceleration becomes lower, As Mass and acceleration are inversely proportional to each other. Earth Mass is much much higher than the Apple's Mass, So Earth's acceleration towards apple will become approx Zero. That's why Earth doesn't moves towards apple, only apple moves towards earth....

@@HarshaHarshG-tb3pu Ok, give me your take on how gravity causes acceleration between masses? Traditionally it’s the radius adjusting it, but…why and how does this measurement really do the deed? I have a hypothesis as to how it works, but would like to see if you have something different first.

@@starventure Aree kahana kya Chahte ho....!!

@@starventure I didn't get what you said. Can you elaborate your Comment plz.

You have to think in terms of Inertia. Basically Earth have more Inertia than Apple, As Inertia and Mass are Directly proportional to each other. Inertia is like Laziness, Earth doesn't want to move towards apple as Earth Mass is greater than the Apple's Mass. Only Apple moves towards the Earth.