Have you lost your marbles?? Clearly not !! (even when they shoot off the canvass 😄). This is yet another wonderful piece of inventiveness...."Fibonacci meets fluid art" is how I would categorise this technique. Certainly the finished work is so redolent of the spiral types you mentioned in the narration, but for me, it is most strikingly reminiscent of the amazing appearance of the cross-section of shells of the nautilus (a marine mollusc). The resemblance is most obviously to the shape, but often the inner surface of these shells, especially in the smallest and most tightly curling components at the centre, can be coated in vivid irridescent hues of blues, greens, purples and pinks...."mother-of-pearl-like"..... just like the palette you chose today 😮😊..... A wonderful reminder of the amazing beauty and complexity to be found in nature.....and all thanks to a "meandering marble under centrifugal and centripetal forces" 😮❤
@user-ke1qj4nk2z2 күн бұрын
Iam expercing my studies anyway always ❤❤❤
@SaikrishnashaswatSahoo2 күн бұрын
But apple is not a elastic body
@JayJay-ki4mi3 күн бұрын
You can also create a galvanic cell with soil.
@reen91053 күн бұрын
best explanation out there
@enayahraza95084 күн бұрын
Very helpful
@Deborah_3o8u7 күн бұрын
Join us for an exclusive interview with the CEO of Binance for insights into future developments
@Margaret___71z7 күн бұрын
An insider's perspective: exclusive interview with Binance's CEO on future developments
@Kvhebbal11B8 күн бұрын
Good video!
@XAINULLAH.4448 күн бұрын
tatyt
@SuperAstrax11113 күн бұрын
My question is, why the apple didn't break when it reach the ground???🤣🤣🤣
@AadilNazirWani13 күн бұрын
In salt bridge there may be NaCl not NaCi
@lilcupcake-mm2du14 күн бұрын
I was really having hard time understanding through reading. a good animation was heck of help!♥️
@prachishahi62415 күн бұрын
Thank you for the explanation. Loved it❤
@doracake78822 күн бұрын
Both the objects will not reach the ground at the same time ❗ Since, both the objects are under the influence of same gravitational acceleration. Also the horizontal motion of the thrown object, doesn't have any affect on its vertical motion. The vertical velocity both the objects are same at any given time during their fall and both the objects falls from the same height. The object with the horizontal motion needs to travel a greater distance compared to the other object . Soo, it takes a slightly longer time to reach the ground. In reality, the difference is very small, and both objects appear to reach the ground simultaneously.
@manjulas201625 күн бұрын
Hi
@HenryBriskin25 күн бұрын
It acts towards the centre of a circle
@ilikespaceengine26 күн бұрын
I almost had epilepsy after watching the video,because I learned before that centripetal force was actually internal and centrifugal is external,but not.
@luis-sophus-8227Ай бұрын
The most pathetic experiment to prove gravity
@Tanaquil_de_LammerforsАй бұрын
Why? Just because you are not able to debunk it?
@luis-sophus-8227Ай бұрын
@@Tanaquil_de_Lammerfors Because the results are as inconsistent as they can get.
@Tanaquil_de_LammerforsАй бұрын
@@luis-sophus-8227 I don´t know, which inconsistencies you are referring to. Please explain. As far as i know, Henry Cavendish measured the value of the gravitational constant in 1798 with a deviation of just 1,2% to the actual measurements. That is pretty close, considering the quality of the measurement equipment of that time.
@luis-sophus-8227Ай бұрын
@@Tanaquil_de_Lammerfors A deviation 1,2% of the actual experiments which also provide inconsistent results. The experiment also assumes that gravity is at play where any slight disbalance and sysmic activity will change the results, static electricity is stated to hold a far stronger effect than the supposed gravity. If this experiment were to be conducted at a larger scale then it would be interesting to see the results, nobody I know has tried to heighten the stakes, most likely because it's not going to favor their idea.
@elicthanks7578Ай бұрын
How chemistry books and blogs teaching science can make it insanely difficult to understand? Thank you man! You didn't have this lifesaving video explaning it. you had to study really hard to aquire this knowledge, and now you're sharing it with us. Thank you very much
@MojayjayАй бұрын
This just cleared up a 7 years dilemma for me <3 THANKS!!
@user-cn8fi4tv8jАй бұрын
❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤thankyou very much
@nayakgamerz1682Ай бұрын
Good 😊
@thehawk217Ай бұрын
Electrochemistry has been confusing AF for me but this video has helped me understand it so easily. THANKYOU!!!
@kamruzzamantauhid7445Ай бұрын
Centripetal force is what you need to grasp to understand circular motion. Centrifugal force does not exist. People need to stop explaining it as if it does. The only reason people do not understand the highly essential centripetal force is because educators tend to confuse them by mentioning centrifugal force along with centripetal force.
@alejandrocarranza31Ай бұрын
excellent video. May I know what program you use for the animation?
@Tobechukwumishael.Ай бұрын
You are wise....
@HakurgamingАй бұрын
❤
@user-xz4hc7hm4tАй бұрын
Anyone in 2024😅
@hg2.Ай бұрын
This is the best battery chemistry I've seen yet on KZfaq. kzfaq.info/get/bejne/p9Z2dsJ2yNvDqYU.htmlsi=XWOEaO9tKk19ziUM
@TrkiveАй бұрын
I'm in utter disbelief that I'm only now able to conceptualize physics.
@no_one_160Ай бұрын
A science that calls upon a pseudo-imaginary-force. Life gets stranger and stranger.
@sahilwani5346Ай бұрын
Nice
@TogetherwithPhysics93Ай бұрын
Hello, thanks for your video. I would like to do the video with animation like you. Can you guide me on how to do that? Thank you very much ❤❤❤
@Prachet-mz4zxАй бұрын
Thanks a lot for such a beautiful explanation!
@Prachet-mz4zxАй бұрын
Wow! Such a clear explanation. Thank you!
@creativent2702Ай бұрын
This is a good video, i am simply commenting this so that the video can get more reach.
@khushithakraal3765Ай бұрын
🌟🌟🌟
@mehmetuslu9790Ай бұрын
Keşke türkçe altyazı olsa 😢
@SpeedRunGamingPHАй бұрын
Imma make a band Force of Azimuth😂
@HS-vr7cq2 ай бұрын
I am thinking round apple fall on ground due to gravitational force then why moon moving around instead of falling down on ground due to gravitational force. Neither let it go away nor it let it fall on the ground.
@santifpc3749Ай бұрын
Alright so maybe if you paid attention to the video you would know. The reasons why the apple falls into the Earth's surface and the Moon doesnt are these: 1.- If you take a look at the formula for universal gravitation, and as it is SAID in the video you are commenting, the gravitational pull decreases by the square of the distance between the 2 analized objects. The Moon is very far away from the Earth, but not enought to scape its pull, the apple in the other hand, is right by its surface, where the force exerted in it thanks to the gravitational field of the earth is much much stronger. 2.- The Moon has inertia (or centrifugal force) thanks to its orbit around Earth, which as you should know, given you are watching physics videos, is a force exeded in objects when on a circular motion, that pulls tangentially to its path, which already stated, is circular. And as an added bonus to sprinkle some more knowledge into you the reason this motion doesnt stop is because space is frictionless, meaning there is no recistence to the motion of objects, thats why the Moon can keep ots orbit indefinitely, or the Erth's orbit around the Sun, etc. This is thanks to Newton's first law of motion, that if no force is applied on an object, its motion will not change. The reason here on Earth things do eventually stop moving is thanks to either surface friction, viscocity of fluids, or air recistence.
@kwastormaytАй бұрын
the moon is permanently pulled away by its tangential momentum which is equal to the gravitaional force of earth
@user-vt2ld3ds2u2 ай бұрын
please, I can't understand, how is it possible, the earth speed course is more efficient than the moon course speed, yes, yes isn't, 🤔, but how, the moon still stood in the sky, please explain, 🌎🌙🚀🤔
@santifpc3749Ай бұрын
if what you mean by this (cuz I have absolutely 0 clue of what you are saying, please improve your english) is ti ask why the moon doesnt fall to the earth the asnwer is because of the inertia or centrifugal force it has thanks to its orbit, as you know space is a frctionless surface so this keeps going forever. also what do you mean by "course speed"
@georgevprochazka53162 ай бұрын
If a tennis ball is placed on a rotating table top, it will not fall off. Why ?
@sudais9022 ай бұрын
kash pora apple tree isacc newton par gr jata
@OutstandingCitizen2 ай бұрын
too bad they can't isolate the mass
@SsmarcosS412 ай бұрын
but at the same time the objectys are atractedd by earth gravity
@waliaphellps17452 ай бұрын
The earth, the hand, etc… create a centripetal force, that’s why the moon, the tenis ball… star spining. So I don’t understand why you say the tension has to increase to provide more centripetal force. The reason I don’t understand is that the centripetal force is increased so the object spins faster. Cause effec issue.