Maybe the screen recording messed it up?

Hey come on...that are at least 4 fps.. don't be so harsh.

Camtasia has the worst screen recording software, I don't know why he still uses it instead of OBS...

Probably has to do with transcoding 60fps footage to 30fps.

He actually mentions it later, he's recording on the same computer, and running the dev environment in the background. But yes, very stuttery example.

Are we sure the whole video isn't just super slowed down? Mike seems to be speaking at a fairly normal rate for a human, which is quite slow for him.

I think they dropped Mac before then. I think the supported feature set for OpenGL for Mac wasn't quite up to the task.

To be honest I never got into anywhere near the level of depth to make a performance judgment call like that. The framework itself though does seem exceptionally customizable so I doubt you'd have trouble wiring in NPR.

@@gamefromscratch Thanks for clarifying!

Well, from my experience the documentation is all over the place. But other than that I agree, it's amazing. Also if you're pretty good at coding, now is a good time to check out cryengine again.

Same way it was done 10-15 years ago when everyone was using in house engines, they just learn to work with them. That's what a studio pays it's artists for, to produce art and to understand the systems they are producing art for.

they might release a new usage model for indies. at least that is what everyone is expecting from them and they know it well from the comments on their YT channel. other than that i hope the Indie version has double percision support it is basically the main selling point.

@@mindspunk if your a small enterprise forget it. it wont be worth it for someone to do that. esp if your a contract worker. esp if you cant reliably pay people which goes on alot in small enterprises. big companies with big budgets sure. but indies you need to pull from a talent pool that already knows the tools. today things are very different than 10-15 years ago. i started working in the industry at looking glass tech on system shock 1. im still working in a big corp now. for them your right. i just question small operators drawing the talent with extra bars to adoption.

@@harisg8120 i hope they understand this easy adoption model. free to learn pay to make $$ and document the shit out of it. documentation is a form of marketing things. also a community of people doing tutorials and vids to show others how to approach things is massively useful. its easy in easy out as people have to constantly shift hats these days to do anything. i personally would love to see more disruption in the engine category. we've had this big three for a while now. unity unreal cry etc. more players is good.

Entirely the recorders fault, plus something about being converted to KZfaq framerates hurt it even more.

Big world games? Space games and sim games?

Well, there are some people out there creating an engine from scratch here on KZfaq. I think this isn't the focus of the channel

@@user-lz2oh9zz4y I know it isn't the focus. You are right tho.

@@user-lz2oh9zz4y What are some examples? The only one I know about geared toward modern platforms is handmade hero, all the others ive found seem to be for retro systems where that sort of thing is a requirement

There is The Cherno with his Hazel engine, he worked at EA and now develop a C++ game engine with the community

@@jlewwis1995 If you can tolerate mild edgyniess, there's ChiliTomatoNoodle

That's unireal

Minus proper support and visual scripting. Also no content marketplace.

@@jackrabbit656 yeah I know it's a good engine, just not for hobbyists.

@@jackrabbit656 What? Unigine is going free? That is pretty big news, but I don't know any C++ and I don't feel comfortable with it. I know where I'm going with my project, and I'm able to grasp the complexities of the UE4 script program. Since I'm on my own I don't have the option of going into Unigine.

@@jackrabbit656 Well that might be worth waiting for then. I believe their engine is better suited to creating huge worlds but I'm not quite sure of the performance vs UE4. Also, what is your source of information?

MAD GORILLA you can go to the official unigine channel, they have so many tutorials

lol

So? UE4 is doing pretty great in China.

@@harisg8120 Look at what happened recently with Blizzard...

@@sveinndagur or Activision, when it happenes it happenes. no excuse to not use a good product.

It's 40%, not that that's any better.

yes it can

I think Chinese spyware is more dangerous

?

Uniginescript is basically high level C++, with nested namespaces and foreach from C#. You can edit the code in a C++ code editor without much problems.

Its now free and supports C++, C# or UnigineScript and its godlike

Why? People are using it.

@@13thxenos Not enough.

Well maybe if there were cross platform programs before there were more people who would have used it. It isn't really hard to make programs cross platform nowadays, and it does put a strain on windows monopoly, which is good for the industry in general. So I ask again, why should they kill this feature? It is not very costly, and it is beneficial, and there are people who are using it, although not enough people in your opinion, even if no one was using it right now, it is a good feature to implement.

@@13thxenos It is REALLY hard to make cross platform games nowdays. One word: support. Especially on linux with its myriad of distros and drivers. Check this post for example www.reddit.com/r/Games/comments/376qki/less_than_1_linux_users_according_to_steam_survey/crk5t1q/

Things run pretty well in my Linux machine; some games even go into the triple digits FPS, and I can play many VR titles with pretty much no issues...

Apples and oranges. GDevelop and Unigine are not comparable. One is a 2D game engine while other is an industry standard simulation engine/ Game engine. If you say Unity or Unreal then you're right.

@@vaishnav_mallya Apples and Apples. Bye :)

@@LeonidDeburger very limited and a performance killer

@HaloBaller9813 i worked with it , it's crap , if it really was good nobody gonna use unreal or unity , the numbers speak for themselves even the games that using this engine are slow paced and basics games

@@TheBlackbirdii People use unity and unreal because their licensing is available for small studios and individuals, take a look at the things backend and you will start to apreciate this engine, 64 bit floating point precision, 1:1 scale worlds, realistic weather and oceans out of the box. This engine isnt a traditional game engine but more of a simulation engine designed for people who want to build huge scale simulations and or sim games. Checkout the new free version its really damn decent, the only thing stopping me moving over to this engine right now is the lack of in depth tutorials. Unity/Unreal have more users currently so have more tutorials around the net etc.