As a retired Physician and PhD chemist, I think it is disgraceful how they have withheld information

How about the pneumonia like deaths in July 2019 in the US blamed on vaping? Or the fact that the military biological lab in Fort Detrick was shut down for safety reasons in July 2019? Or the pnuemonia deaths in the summer of 2019 in a retirement home in Maryland? Were all these cases investigated?

I have the utmost respect to you Professor Sachs, thank you for telling the truth. The world will remember you for what your courage and dedication!!!

Gain of function research was conducted in the University of North Carolina before 2016, there were articles written about it in 2015. Look up "Engineered bat virus stirs debate over risky research"

Thank you Jefferey Sachs for everything you do!

The NIH has a huge responsibility here. Maybe cause and effect. Their redactatations certainly point to culpability. At the minimum the NIH certainly needs to redefine its oversight. And leadership!

Outstanding job. Why would two of the smartest men in the world and others in the United States government, try to limit the discussion to zoonotic origin and dismiss the lab leak theory? NIH is responsible for Pandemic Preparedness and “Bioweapon Preparedness”.

Moderna patented the key inserted nucleotide sequence that weaponized SARS (the 12 nucleotide furin cleavage site that allows the virus to unzip the human cell wall after attaching to the ACE2 receptor). Moderna’s patent US 9587003, which was filed in 2017

As a purely lay person on these subjects, my thanks to Professor Sachs and all associated with this presentation. I found it both informative but also well balance and evidence driven and seeking which is the best of what science does. Again, my thanks to all.

The world owes Dr. Sachs so much!

Your tireless dedication to bringing truth to people, your unwavering will to expose the lies and crimes of the Deep State makes you indispensable to us. You have the sources that are closed to people like me. Mr. Sachs, you do a great job!! Thank you.

Respect to the LANCET committee. Great work led by Prof. Jeffrey D. Sachs.

Professor Jefferey Sachs, your courage and integrity are admirable ! stay healthy and safe, my prayers are with you.

Whichever hypothesis is true, I'm afraid human arrogance combined with incredible destructive capacities of applied science does not bode well for this species. Bioethics is a mere afterthought for these scientists and their teams. I recall reading a bioethics book chapter that had the memorable title, "How to play God and do it Responsibly." I remember reading Doudna's Crack In Creation, and at first she experienced moments of dread and nightmares. Yet here we are, the masses utterly incurious about all of it; biosafety and biosecurity hardly codified in the US and elsewhere. And it's not just bioethics. Consider that almost daily we hear pundits, politicians and military experts opine on the considerable risk of nuclear war-- including Presiden Biden. It has become so normalized that nobody shivers at the thought nowadays. How unlike the Cold War in which I grew up (the later years of it). The way it is discussed resembles the analysis of a football game, or strategy in chess. Dull-eyed and anesthetized the masses doomscroll through all of it with only a vague awareness of just what could happen. The media mimic the gov't line nowadays (on just fighting against Russians "as long as it takes" no matter the economic or nuclear world-wide risks). They identify all who would seek diplomacy as "Putin appeasers." Same with Covid. Any suggestion that the official narrative could be wrong was suppressed for years, and even now you are ostracized for having discussions like this one. Sachs has become persona non gratis for daring to question these things, as have the other panelists here. None of the natural spillover proponents will even *discuss* the issue, and info at gov't levels is shrouded in layers upon layers of secrecy. As I said, ethics is a mere after -thought in an age of very dangerous toys, and a lot of reckless people.

Thank you so much for trying to get to the truth. I know how difficult it is for many lab people to speak in public. I have biology degree from Univ of MN and spent time in the lab. I've also studied epidemiology & Cell Bio. I think it's outrageous that the vector hasn't even been found yet after 3 years. I understood that's the primary concern when investigating a contagion. Maybe Epidemiology has drastically changed since I was in school? Thank you once again to everyone for having the courage to pursue this crazy situation.

1:58 Start 16:23 Dr. Alina Chan 30:46 Dr. Richard H. Ebright 52:03 Ms. Emily Kopp 1:11:20 (Q&A Start) Dr. Ismail Serageldin 1:16:19 Dr. Phoebe Kounduri

All that I expect in anyone is integrity and Jeffery has integrity.

Asking WHO to have more oversight makes Jeffrey Sachs look like an "oxymoron!" As an economist myself I always looked forward towards a unified world, unfortunately the unified world we are currently moving towards is one under a fascist corporate rule. There are many issues currently facing the future of existence, but the emergence of corporate technocratic oligarchy will just push humanity towards a mass genocide. There are better solutions and a better way of oversight that allows a bottom up approach. I hope Jeffrey really looks into that! Aloha from Hawai'i!

We need to talk about Fauci.

I didn't just fall off a turnip truck yesterday and already understand there is goofy research going on worldwide, where I object is anyone spending US tax dollars for something that's looking increasingly like fraud. I'd like to thank this organization and anybody really, willing to investigate chain of custody etc. in research, you're the unsung heroes possessing the professional gravitas people can take seriously. And Miss Emily, you are the future I can be grateful and hopeful for. PS... My father, a philosophy and logic professor at university and my mother degreed but who chose to teach youngsters in public school are the reason I know what heroes look like, so no vegetables here although I will say a farmer driving a turnip truck away from glyphosate gets to cut in line to the top of the planet's new hero list.

*There was no lab leak!* Covid originated in a WEF meeting, where this rule was invented: *"If someone dies WITH covid-19 [positive PCR], we are counting that."* -Dr. Birx. Same rule applied worldwide.

Apologies if the following question has already been asked. What about the often cited examples of detection of the SARS-2 virus in other parts of the world prior to the main outbreak in Wuhan? For example, in Italy in a medical survey earlier in the year. In Spain in sewage water. And in the US. Surely, this must be one of the first questions that should be addressed and confirmed or refuted...

I would reject the entire classification process, since there is no independent party which would be able to verify valid redactions from invalid ones. And we know from the 50s, 60s and 70s when it comes to the nuclear weapons projects and test on humans using radioactive materials that the classification system was used to simply hide embarrassing information without any valid reason.

Great dialogue/discussions/hypothesis One serious concern I do have is to suggest the WHO to conduct/oversee this investigation. It has Clearly been proven that they are not trustworthy given that they are funded by numerous countries. The WHO was also delayed in taking action and communicating the Pandemic. Looking forward to part 2 and 3

Very interesting debate, but I would like to offer up some constructive criticism:- although paying lip service to other possibilities, most of the presentations focus their analysis on a single assumption - that the Wuhan outbreak was the FIRST outbreak in the human population. And there is information out there which proves otherwise, for example:- > the Italian smokers study, which retained blood samples, which on retesting confirmed the presence of IgG and IgM antibodies to SARS-CoV-2 virus in people across all regions of Italy, including the islands of Sicily and Sardinia, some as early as 2nd September 2019. Given the time needed for an infected person to create antibodies, and the exponential transmission combined with the fact that the outbreak wasn't localised in a single region, but widespread - these point to a much earlier outbreak in Italy - at least as early as August. > the Spanish (Barcelona) sewage sample of February 2019, where the actual SARS-CoV-2 virus was found, point to an even earlier, possibly smaller outbreak. > the boom in severe respiratory diseases across Europe, which were rather shoddily written off as "atypical pneumonia" or "severe influenza" (despite the negative results to the flu virus tests), point to multiple earlier outbreaks of COVID-19 in Europe during 2019. This is confirmed by the retests of samples of Paris Hospital patients who died from some of these "atypical pneumonias" which showed that they were in fact caused by the SARS-CoV-2 virus. It would have been impossible for a COVID-19 outbreak in Wuhan in late December 2019, where the first confirmed deaths occurred in January 2020, to have been the source of these European outbreaks, unless the infected person from Wuhan travelled to Europe in a time machine (excuse the sarcasm). The consequences of making such an assumption are considerable:- > perhaps we haven't been able to identify the transition animal species, because we have been looking for it in the wrong place, in China, instead of in Europe, in zoos, in mink farms, and in some of the very crowded factory farms where animals are kept in very unnatural and crowded environments. > perhaps the case for the lab escape theory is unnecessarily being restricted to a single lab in Wuhan, when we know that there were dozens of similar US-funded bio-labs in Ukraine and other eastern European countries, all equally murky. Ukraine's poor track record on following safety standards is already known (e.g. the Chernobil disaster), > perhaps the evidence that the virus was deliberately released, lies in the fact that multiple outbreaks occurred across so many different and distant parts of the globe. I completely agree that even before we know the origin of the virus, the regulations and safety and security standards should be immediately tightened up. But the very first question needs to be - when and where was the very first outbreak of COVID-19. All archives of historic samples should be tested for the presence of the virus and antibodies. For example sewage samples, hospital tissue and blood samples, snow and ice cores top sections, water samples, WADA anti-doping blood samples, autopsy samples, etc. When we have a full and detailed chronology of all the outbreaks, we can then try to link them together, and we might discover that they are not linked by natural virus evolution, or that they are.

The Biosafety P4 lab at Fort Dietrick Maryland was suspiciously closed down in September 2019 regarding safety and containment. This was the US premiere Biodefense lab since beginning of Cold War. It was focus during Anthrax scare. How come there is never any mention here of its research and function in the Coronavirus work?

this guy has been around 100% correct in every topic not just vrs related. 👍

Mr . Sachs in my opinion you're the only voice of reason coming from Western Sources and gives hope that there is still a chance for humanity to achieve Global PEACE and STABILITY in this Troubled world. The only alternative for Humanity going Forward is ARMAGEDDON for ALL. THANK YOU, PEACE and MUCH SUCCESS my BROTHER.

May God continue to Bless and keep you and yours safe Mr Sachs! You are a Refreshing and Much Needed voice in these times! I truly hope that The Lancet can recoup their standing in the scientific realm! Et Tu Lancet? You broke my PreMed Educated Heart and Mind! NEVER AGAIN & 🚫NO PANDEMIC AMNESTY 🚫 Medical Ethics Required for Treatment: 1) Necessary? 2) Effective? 3) Safety/Risk Ratio for most reasonable

Thanks to all of you seeking solutions to the prescient Covid issues. Keep up your solid efforts!

It's so refreshing to hear an American such as Dr Sachs and the other scientists being so frank in discussions on the virus origins. For more 2 years we have only been allowed to hear discussions mostly around the narrative that it originated from Wuhan. Thank you Dr Sachs for the battle you took on to investigate and report the truth.

Please review Dr John Campbell’s post regarding blood samples taken across the whole of Italy from early September 2019 to March 2020, which were subsequently screened for Covid 19 antibodies. Over 100 samples showed positive for antibodies and every person was asymptomatic.

Open debate was stifled. That in itself needs addressing. Scientists and experts wishing to contribute to debate should not be censored by experts in media control.

( 2:00) Prof. Jeffrey D. Sachs (15:00) Dr. Alina Chan (30:05) Dr. Richard H. Ebright (50:07) Ms. Emily Kopp (1:04:26) Prof. Jeffrey D. Sachs (1:10:40) Dr. Ismail Serageldin ( 1:13:37) Dr. Richard H. Ebright (1:14:45) Dr. Alina Chan (1:15:55) Prof. Phoebe Koundouri (1:17:53 ) Dr. Alina Chan (1:19:40) Ms. Emily Kopp ...

Thank you for telling the truth!

According to the paper from US CDC, they found all nine states showed covid-19 antibodies and that quote sars-cov-2 reactive antibodies were detected in 106 specimens, a small percentage of blood donations from California, Oregon, and Washington as early as December 2019. That's 1.4%(106) of the population with antibodies for covid-19 then. Given that it takes around two weeks for these antibodies to form. Guess how many patients were really there around December 2019 in US?

A coalition of INTERNATIONAL SCIENTISTS. Yes. Their used to collaborate and be SOOO proud of their team efforts to discover new scientific stuffs (human genomes, DNA, cures for diseases, vaccines of all kinds) just before the pandemic started. Are there still such a world wide team efforts now or have these things gone undercover? or disappeared?

Thank you Jeffrey and all

Jerry Sachs is an angel who fights against injustice. Respect Jeffrey Sachs of speaking out the truth against the majority of Americans. A high moral standard and brave individual. We need more of him so that we can have a peaceful world.

Most excellent!! More of this is desperately needed.

My daughter and I went to 12 States …visiting 5 tourist spots. We started out Nov 2019…the Monday before Thanksgiving. When we returned December 3rd…we were so sick. I was running 4 miles a day and it almost killed me. My young daughter went to er and they took X-ray and tested her for pneumonia. The X-ray showed it as bronchitis. Negative for pneumonia. What we had was from hell. I have never been the same. Six months to recover to a certain extent.

Thank you for this important discussion and discovery process.

9:03 Let us work backwards to this. If this was genuinely a zoonotic spillover or an accidental lab leak, why was there an unscientific focus on vaccine driven solutions (that was understood at the time to take years to develop - with no guarantees) and the forbidding of the wider medical fraternity to try different things? Why the insistence on "well designed clinical trials" for repurposed drugs, but slipshod work with nebulous end goals for vaccines? Why did the WHO lead the charge to discount natural immunity when this went against the "accepted science" at the time? When viral loads were discovered to be equal in both the vaccinated and unvaccinated, how did the insistence to enforce vaccine mandates and passports develop? When these questions are answered, then the answer to the question of origins will become clearer.

Immense thanks to you, Professor Sachs, and all true scientists for working to carefully sift through the data for the distilled scientific facts. Kudos! Keeps me wanting to get out of bed every day. ☮️❤️🐾

Dr. Sachs. any comment on Fort Detrick and its closure and those patiences nearby?

Operation Mongoose 1962 CIA was going to bioinfecr Cuban Farms crops fields. Kennedy disapproved and they never did it, but govt was saying they were gonna treat it as natural but intl comm. might catch on and it would hurt US intl standing

Big shout out and applause for Jeffrey Sachs. What an amazing and brave individual. Their is some hope.....

Having followed the story for some time it is interesting to see the change of views since the original Lancet article which had Peter Daszak as a co author, the same chap who went on the WHO visit to Wuhan and the recipient of funding at Eco Health Alliance from 'I am Science' the most blessed Saint Fauci. As many say, follow the money.

Great video! Thank you for all your hard work in revealing the facts underlying this awful pandemic.

Grate teameffort well conducted as usual by GS👍 Many thanks..

"Cannot touch us, for we have made a lie our refuge and falsehood our hiding place.”--- Isaiah 28:15

How about the pneumonia like illness in January 2018 or 19 in manitoba, Canada which l contracted causing me to be the sickest l have ever been in my life,which at that time l believed to be "the flu".. l was sick about 10 days or so..my weight had dropped from 148pounds to 126 lbs...l firmly believe it's possible l might have contracted an earlier variant of covid......when l went to our local hospital EVERY ROOM was occupied with sick people, even the emergency waiting room with 4 beds! Our ambulance came from 100 km in Northern manitoba because there were no ambulances available locally or Winnipeg. The ambulance was for my 91 year old mother who had fallen....we waited for 1.3/4 hr for the ambulance to finally arrive ...at the hospital l found myself wondering what sort of illness had taken hold of so many people and why....

Everyone should be looking back into 2019.

We need more people like you !!!

Funny to ask organizations to search for answers they already have.

The "Mad Scientist' theory " used to be a useful concept for making scary movies. Today it becomes reality!

Alina Chan Emily Kopp you 2 are President Worthy and can have the key to the city anywhere on Earth

"18 million deaths" was a figure arrived at by computer modelling employing the usual suspects assumptions, i.e., dying 'with' as opposed to 'from' etc.....Right off the bat this number should have been questioned.

Very comprehensive and informative. Thank you so much for making this issue public. Ways forward to prevent any pandemic from happening again is very important.

Check Ft. Detricks alarming leak rate.

Nearly all this info was revealed by Harvard lawyer Dr. Francis Boyle (author of the the International Bioweapons Convention) nearly 3 years ago in his discussion with Alex Jones on Infowars in Feb of 2020. But thanks for having the courage to put together such a solid comprehensive summary. Sharing this version will be politically correct!

Great, informative discussion!! Thanks 🙏 😊

Thank you. So good to hear each of these speakers with their info, thoughts & incites to show investigation & oversites so needed to address so many dangerous areas.

An amazing discussion. Credit to you all.

Sorry, Jeff. I expected more from you about the origin. There was no leak in Wuhan. The 170+ attendees at the Chinese Military Games in October of 2019, a month after we dropped "Gain of Function" on Wuhan in September of 2019. The 170+ US participants of the 9,000 attendees from the other 109 countries attendees. Most of the US participants were sick and we won only 8 metals, 3 silver and 5 bronze. The US came in 35th in the ranking. Many smaller countries came in much better, but most of the other countries went home from Wuhan sick as patient zero for their countries. We have met the enemy and they are us. My assertion is easily tested, go to the 108 different countries and see if patient zero for each country was at Wuhan Military Games.

We humans will always do what we're capable of.

Good morning to a righteous man , Jeffrey Sach 🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉 💪💪💪💪💪👏👏👏👏👏👍👍👍👍👍

I'd like to take this opportunity to spend 20 minutes thanking my colleagues. Those from Yale and those from Harvard and those from MIT and those from Harvard and MIT. We work so hard and do so much it's amazing. Don't feel bad about paying us a lot of money and expecting no results. We are happy to take your money and we'd also like to extend a warm thanks to you for your money.

Ah, I was late for the livestream. Happy to see the replay now.

how do stop future plandemics? turn off tv. breathe and think for yourself.

As far as Evils are not called as Evils, transparency and truths will not be possible.

We're going to have to be prepared for; 1. Government knowing but covering. (They view Viral Manipulation as a must) 2. Multi-Government Community. (Governments working together opposing democracy) 3. Abandoned Citizenry. (We are on our own, worse government let's corporations prey on our vulnerability)

Dr John Campbell has recent information that shows COVID was wide spread elsewhere in September 2019. This report is missing earlier information.

Question.. was very recent Boston University (and others) GOF on Corona done in Level 4, 3 , or 2 labs? If not Level 4 is it possible that their viruses have already escaped and are spreading???

Great discussion! Thank you!

The Commission wants to the _World Health Organization_ to have oversight responsibilities for biosafety and biosecurity of international research programs about dangerous pathogens? Really? After how well it performed with COVID?

how about trying to explain the delta vs omicron how are these related DNA or there is a missing gap between these variants...

Dear Bapak JS, semoga Yang Maha Baik memberkatimu dan keluargamu. Teruslah menjadi CAHAYA dan GARAM kepada kami semua. Amen.

You are the last few bright lights in the darkness..thank you for sharing the truth.

Writing this comment Nov 13th. Page is "missing" to the Commission Report link provided in the show notes.

I quit listening when he said that the WHO should be in charge of monitoring all research. Since when do you turn to the unrepentant criminal to help prevent future crimes?

Encouraging initiative to obtain clarity on what has happened and transparant safe new strategies on research worldwide. Thank you so much for doing this. Hopefully important voices worldwide will join coming webinars. All the best.

4:54 Do the world a favor and talk about Chlorine Dioxide/CDS, and how doctors have been using it with 100% success in Bolivia

My question is why would you locate an institute conducting such dangerous research in an extremely dense and populated environment? Would it not be better to have it somewhere relatively remote?

Craig Ventor suggested 20 years ago that any artificial life should include a makers mark. The gain of function research actually made an effort to create technology that would hide lab manipulation...

Where are the philosophers in biomedical ethics in this discussion? I do hope in future discussions that some who have this specialty will be invited.

Good question from the Greek lady. The fact that USA operates bio research in Ukraine gives an answer; if own law is restrictive or forces transparancy, then do it somewhere else, just like the investigation centers practicing torture.

Once geopolitics moves before anything else, there won't be truth... only the "truth" you choose to believe. Same here.

Let’s hope Dr. Sachs’ openness pervaded to find the truth.

Talk is cheap and action shows the serious nature of these crimes are being addressed.

Thank you Jeffrey "Steel" Sachs!

Does the mortality figure of 18 million include all those deaths from other causes that took place within 28 days of a positive Covid test? If so, shouldn’t the final figure be adjusted?

What if the spillover was on purpose ? Can WHO go into military sites where they have bio labs . ?

There is rarely mention of the most obvious word considering the biggest wealth transfer in history - "deliberate".

Meanwhile, people are suddenly dropping dead worldwide and we can guess the common denominator in these tragedies.

2 questions, maybe 3. Or perhaps 4 or 5. Question 1; Why throughout the entire history of virology as a medical “science” has no physical sample of particles in the nano scale EVER been isolated directly and I mean directly from a sample extracted directly from an organism which is said to be infected with such particles? I am aware of the multiple, now numbering over 2,000 studies which are titled isolation of virus ........ in relation to SARS CoV-2 or any of its variants. I have reviewed many of these papers and ALL of them have been reviewed by one individual or another able to read these studies. ALL the studies follow virtually the same protocols and not ONE has described the isolation of virus particles directly from a sample extracted from a natural host. This is despite the mechanism for doing just such a thing with particles of similar size and density has been done successfully for a very long time now. Why has virology been unable to isolate a sample in such a manner? The only answer given to this enormous problem is that density gradient ultra-centrifugation has failed to produce any significant band in such a manner upon every attempt is that there just aren’t enough of them. The other commonly given answer is “that’s not the way we do it” which is not a reasonable answer. Given that under Virus theory these particles are replication competent and must by nature to be able to move between cells in order to proliferate which one would assume that any natural reservoir should contain billions of these particles even within a small sample. So again, why has no viable sample of virus been isolated DIRECTLY from a sample extracted from any organism? It’s deeply troubling to me that what virology claims is “isolation” is nothing more than insilico modelling. In other words a computer model. Not an actual physical specimen. In other words a cartoon. Question 2; How would virology be able to confirm the accuracy of the in silico (computer model) without having a physical specimen to compare the computer model to? Question 3; How does virology confirm the behaviour of the alleged virus without a physical specimen to use in a tissue assay? Question 4; How can virology call what they’re doing science when they have no physical specimen of virus and only virus to be used as probably THE MOST IMPORTANT independent variable is the tissue assay? In every scientific study you must have a dependant variable (the observed effect being studied-in this case cytopathic effect) and independent variables (in this case an actual physical sample of virus and ONLY virus) there are many other independent variables in the Enders-Peebles based assay protocols which is the assay methodology generally used by every virology lab that has published. In other words virology is not doing science. They are running no controls. Controls does not mean security and PPE and risk assessments etc. I’m talking about a study controls. And the mock infections are not valid controls. Most studies did not publish any of the methodology of the mock infections and the few that did drastically altered the methodology of the mock infections in relation to the study assay hereby invalidating them as a proper control. A valid control would be running the identical assay methodology one with alleged virus in sample and another one without virus in sample. This has never been done. And no researchers or scientists have been able to produce a single paper detailing the actual isolation of a virus in the commonly understood meaning of isolation meaning separating one thing from everything else. Question 5; Since the virus is only an in silico model compiled from tiny fragments of genetic material derived from an assay which used multiple sources of genetic material, how do you know the provenance of the genetic fragments used to compile the in silica model? Question 6; how exactly would one make a chimera out of 2 viruses neither of which exist in the real world, only exist as a computer model?

Just ask Fowchi, he told us in 2017 that a major crisis (or health crisis), WILL happen during Trumps term in office. Bingo, his crystal ball was spot on!

Thank you - very interesting

The world Premiere of 'Died Suddenly' is on Rumble... it is at least a start towards global healing.

The 0.1% Wealthy and PHARMACY Companies, DO NOT CARE if we KNOW !