US Billions $ FLYING Aircraft Carrier Is Finally Ready For Action

  Рет қаралды 6,371,028

Front Cost

Front Cost

Жыл бұрын

US Billions $ FLYING Aircraft Carrier Is Finally Ready For Action
The US Navy is about to become the US Air Force. Aircraft carriers are about to become aircraft. Like the aircraft that take off from them, these aircraft carriers would take off to the skies as opposed to the seas - but for the same reason - to project the might of the US Navy in the brightest colors. Uncommon as the concept of a flying aircraft carrier is, it isn’t a new project and has actually been around since the times of the World Wars. And now, thanks to the advent of technology, they have received renewed attention and the US is once again aiming for revolutionary flying carriers.

Пікірлер: 2 200
@jim9219771
@jim9219771 Жыл бұрын
We are closer to having a human step foot on Mars than we are to having a flying aircraft carrier.
@dianalindeman1644
@dianalindeman1644 Жыл бұрын
Jim Mulholland For the sake of the world, I pray so!
@Sciurus
@Sciurus Жыл бұрын
Yea unless the alledged Solar Warden / Radiant Guardian projects "discovered" by Gary McKinnon are just the deep black off chutes of Thomas Townsend Brown's Project Winterhaven / Project Montgolfier!
@ericmwenda6197
@ericmwenda6197 Жыл бұрын
Right on point. This would be the biggest white elephant project in the world.
@ryansinclair3462
@ryansinclair3462 Жыл бұрын
We have to land on the moon first before we can even think about Mars next 🤣
@ramiznorthland7179
@ramiznorthland7179 Жыл бұрын
Love ❤️ USA 🇺🇸
@johnnelson8956
@johnnelson8956 Жыл бұрын
The U.S.S. Gerald Ford weighs about 90,000 tons. That's over 180 million pounds. The amount of energy needed to lift that much weight would be mind boggling. Short of strapping a few Saturn 5 rockets to each side, it's a safe bet that the technology to pull this off won't exist for at least another century or two.
@Fuunyrob
@Fuunyrob Жыл бұрын
Nuclear power definitely can or nuclear fusion power definitely can so don’t say nothing can
@Fuunyrob
@Fuunyrob Жыл бұрын
You be surprised what the black opps government programs can do
@Research_theTruth
@Research_theTruth Жыл бұрын
Fusion its already there like ngad
@wytche3546
@wytche3546 Жыл бұрын
@@Fuunyrob the weight of an aircraft carrier, the weight of the aircraft, fuel for the aircraft, the crew, food for the crew. The reactor, the water to cool the reactor. You're not looking at the weight of an aircraft carrier, you're looking at possibly the weight of two to three aircraft carriers right there. Impossible.
@KingstonTiger
@KingstonTiger Жыл бұрын
Also you need to make it so that it won't get shot down by a meager 10mil dollar missile from the sky. Would be a neck breaking story if a billion dollar airfleet gets shot down in the warfield
@GreenlackX
@GreenlackX 3 ай бұрын
A totally original Idea thats 100% not stolen from marvel💯💯💯💯
@elienidsanchez6612
@elienidsanchez6612 7 ай бұрын
Civilians: you guys are spending to much money on NASA The US Navy: oh really? The government:
@JacobGevedon
@JacobGevedon 16 күн бұрын
If russians made flying aircraft carriors that held 4 fighters to 8 in world war 2 your telling me we cant do the same with more fighters? At least 12 f22s
@RobertJones-ux6nc
@RobertJones-ux6nc Жыл бұрын
Somebody is on an AVENGERS quest for flying carriers.
@wickwire9560
@wickwire9560 Жыл бұрын
"EXACTLY "!!!
@marthanaandrichardwardandm5973
@marthanaandrichardwardandm5973 Жыл бұрын
They've been working on them
@BBoxn
@BBoxn Жыл бұрын
Sky Captain and the World of Tomorrow are more like it.
@mitchelfeliciano7418
@mitchelfeliciano7418 Жыл бұрын
@@wickwire9560 lyl
@theinformationcollector833
@theinformationcollector833 Жыл бұрын
That would be me and I figured it out. It will be featured in some of my future content. (And yes, I was inspired my Avengers Assemble.) I can prove it, too. Just drop me a line and I'll send you a free copy of CODE NAME: Monte Rico, where I invented five new weapons.
@tonysabga5562
@tonysabga5562 Жыл бұрын
If they can add a sub surface platform for jets to take off towards the front of the carrier, while on the deck, the jets take off to the left. That should double the amount of planes that could take off, twice as fast.
@RobertJones-ux6nc
@RobertJones-ux6nc Жыл бұрын
The problem of the number of Aircraft on a Carrier is not how many , but of the storage of them and maintenance. That's the problem for most, the Ford Class can probably carry more but if the hanger is full can maybe carry more on deck like some did in WW2 like when USS Hornet attacked Japan on the Jimmy Doolittle B-25 raid but had USS Enterprise as escorting it then.
@HelminthCombos
@HelminthCombos Жыл бұрын
And remove all plane storage and repair stations. Also this is just clickbait not real at all.
@user-rj1cv8lo1i
@user-rj1cv8lo1i 7 ай бұрын
The landing for this aircraft on sea what a great place on Earth.
@readthetype
@readthetype Жыл бұрын
I especially like _“this is possible, because technology.”_ Phew! I’m super glad you cleared that up for us!! *Me:* _“How does it work?”_ *You:* _“I just did a technology!”_
@herbiee22
@herbiee22 Жыл бұрын
Yes. How fast could this fly...the size of it. How agile would it be...How could it avoid enemy fire ? Once downed think of all the personnel and equipment lost.....
@twerkingtwinkies2335
@twerkingtwinkies2335 Жыл бұрын
Not to mention operating cost. Better just permanently hook up a fuel line to the ground and have it be stationary lol
@kyrkwalters964
@kyrkwalters964 Жыл бұрын
For real 🤔
@jimslocomb7098
@jimslocomb7098 Жыл бұрын
It will just engage it's cloaking device yo!🤣
@jarrodcross1482
@jarrodcross1482 Жыл бұрын
Just simply implausible... there's no way that could either exist let alone fly ... hover or move ...
@ShadowWolf-om4ub
@ShadowWolf-om4ub Жыл бұрын
Don't say impossible. You've seen what human kind have done already
@Deran087
@Deran087 Жыл бұрын
@@ShadowWolf-om4ub It definetely isn't impossible, but It isn't happening any time closer than like 70 years.
@ShadowWolf-om4ub
@ShadowWolf-om4ub Жыл бұрын
@@Deran087 its alright. I'll cryo myself until then
@user-mb9bo4jz8o
@user-mb9bo4jz8o 6 ай бұрын
Wow the navy have been busy producing powerful and amazing aircraft and technology continuesly just like star trek is also navy and a wave of our future so to everyone "Live Long And Prosper"
@majestedefrance6304
@majestedefrance6304 Жыл бұрын
The reasons most countries don't invest in aircraft carriers is that they are a bigger target. There are cold launch hypersonic missiles that can blow any aircraft carrier out of the water before any radar can detect it in time. Unmanned drones that can be programmed to attack a ship in swarms overwhelming the ship's defensive capabilities. The bigger the object the bigger the target.
@egidiuspettersson8849
@egidiuspettersson8849 Жыл бұрын
agreed
@Peakfreud
@Peakfreud Жыл бұрын
Most common sense comment on this thread.
@Peakfreud
@Peakfreud Жыл бұрын
Nothing like a 50 Billion Dollar Pinata
@underconstruction778
@underconstruction778 Жыл бұрын
It's main purpose is exactly what it's name is. Aircraft carrier. The benefit to transport fighter jets to far off places while at the same time carry large missiles and nuclear warheads. Enable the US to be in direct strike distance to any country in the world
@majestedefrance6304
@majestedefrance6304 Жыл бұрын
@@underconstruction778 Great answer..Yet it's still a big target considering the new type of weapons available today by enemies.
@thomasproshowski7538
@thomasproshowski7538 Жыл бұрын
Well done, let them fly as many as possible
@joelglaze5545
@joelglaze5545 Жыл бұрын
It will be awhile awesome idea but would take massive lift to pull this off
@jimslocomb7098
@jimslocomb7098 Жыл бұрын
Not if they use the "technology" stored at Area 51.
@LukusaFrank-dg1ib
@LukusaFrank-dg1ib Жыл бұрын
World most powerful in technologybig up USA.
@GaryHBoulding
@GaryHBoulding Жыл бұрын
This aircraft was introduced in the movie, "The Titans" that had bays for jets and the large winged static Osprey .
@user-nk4sx7kk9t
@user-nk4sx7kk9t Жыл бұрын
This FLYING Aircraft Carrier is transformable, and if transformed, it will become a giant robot, I'm sure.
@eliascommentonly4652
@eliascommentonly4652 Жыл бұрын
🇪🇺🇬🇷👋 they could build a small carrier .1 big plane carrying 1 small fighter jet like space shuttle plane it's the only logical solution 1 big plane carrying a fighter jet close to battle and then leave it to fly to save fuel 🇪🇺🇪🇺🇪🇺🇪🇺🇬🇷🇬🇷🇬🇷🇬🇷👋🙏🙏🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿☮☮☮🇺🇦🇷🇺🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸👑👋🇬🇧🇬🇧🇬🇧🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿
@philholman8520
@philholman8520 Жыл бұрын
Yeah! One huge "Mother goose."☺️👍✌️🇬🇧
@tonyi5001
@tonyi5001 Жыл бұрын
Here come Robojox
@floydjohnson7888
@floydjohnson7888 Жыл бұрын
I immediately thought "Super Dimensional Fortress Macross" when I read that comment
@bultenaverhuurbv3106
@bultenaverhuurbv3106 11 ай бұрын
Optimus Crime
@hmm7302
@hmm7302 Жыл бұрын
Story that touches the heart...USA Aircraft carrier! Uuunn!
@TheGecko213
@TheGecko213 Жыл бұрын
Because that and missile submarines are the heart of the USA military might
@udayankale4978
@udayankale4978 7 ай бұрын
Bruh , nice editing, combination of avenger movie scene and real time aircraft takeoff scene😅
@vigilanterocco381
@vigilanterocco381 8 ай бұрын
I can't imagine how much energy to lift it up in the air; 10.000 gallons?.
@matthewk7507
@matthewk7507 Жыл бұрын
Yeah... this isn't going to happen, unless there is some serious security and safety measures added to it. Perhaps a photon shield, energy shield, or some extremely prcise and fast anti missile technology. If one engine is taken out, or just some portion of power is reduced, the entire "flying aircraft carrier" would fall out of the sky and be completely destroyed. This is pie in the sky at best, and a horrible idea at worst.
@tonywilson4713
@tonywilson4713 Жыл бұрын
Yeah - Its just staggering how many clowns peddling this sort of sci-fi bullshite there are on KZfaq. Worse is the fact there are literally millions of people who believe this crap is real. Millions claim the moon missions were faked and then millions turn around and believe this crap. Its enough to make you wonder if oxygen is actually a hallucinogenic.
@getssmith112
@getssmith112 Жыл бұрын
Nope, it's easier to hide in the sky than land or water. Water is so dangerous, their is a lot of enemy to comprehend. With projectiles going down, enemy will just need little energy to attack. While in air with US perfect stealth there only few attacks to watch out, but even an enemy would detect them they will need more energy to launch an attack. Since projectiles going up consumes a lot of energy. Example weapons like cannons, high caliber bullets, small missiles, and torpedoes can't reach them only fighter jets and medium to bigger size missiles can reach them. Besides since ancient times there is always so called higher ground advantages. The higher you are the more invincible you will for any attacks. Same as goes to the sky.
@lharris428
@lharris428 Жыл бұрын
@@getssmith112 are you kidding me? I can't fly higher than 10k feet otherwise people on deck would need their own breathable oxygen while trying to maintain operations. As far as stealth, there's no way you can make it hard to be noticable or targeted with everything going on and around it.
@getssmith112
@getssmith112 Жыл бұрын
@@lharris428 have you ever heard of low orbit? And how does astronauts live in space for months?
@bullheimer
@bullheimer Жыл бұрын
@@getssmith112 you do know China has hypersonic missiles, right?
@superpunkmuffin
@superpunkmuffin Жыл бұрын
The US had Zeppelin flying aircraft carriers, the Macon and Ackron, back in the 1930s - they even had vectored thrust,
@kevinkarbonik2928
@kevinkarbonik2928 Жыл бұрын
they were lighter that air dirigibles... don't confuse yourself.
@superpunkmuffin
@superpunkmuffin Жыл бұрын
@@kevinkarbonik2928 They were lighter than air dirigibles that carried heavier-than-air aircraft and could launch an recapture them mid air - by any definition, aircraft carriers - and they also had vectored thrust capabilities - don't think there's anything confusing about it - Though on a technical point, all dirigibles fly a little heavier than air, and rely in part on dynamic lift, for the advisable expedient of a fail-safe return to land in the event of total engine and valving failure.
@MartinmwendaKubai-vr9ez
@MartinmwendaKubai-vr9ez 11 ай бұрын
Excellent thanks
@mayamar529
@mayamar529 8 ай бұрын
USS Macon was a flying aircraft carrier in the 1930s.
@alexanderschulte8248
@alexanderschulte8248 Жыл бұрын
Yes we can lift one of the heaviest man made objects using a few turbofans. Very believable.
@apocraphontripp4728
@apocraphontripp4728 Жыл бұрын
Cyclocopter tech should be used. I wouldn't say flying but the ability to jump, lets say 100 miles, would be impressive and tactically useful. Same consept as the space/ sea craft from the movie battle ship. Jump in, deploy aircraft, jump out. Then jump back in recover and jump out again.
@maxhansen-ho2fk
@maxhansen-ho2fk 2 ай бұрын
Make it usa i trust in you! Forza usa
@Gvegasman43
@Gvegasman43 Жыл бұрын
They keep making these videos like this stuff is real and ready for action.
@jeff0247598
@jeff0247598 Жыл бұрын
The Lockheed version of a nuclear powered flying aircraft carrier is so freakn cool but would be soooo expensive. To see it fly would be awe inspiring. Tactically, it would be a HUGE target as well. Yes it can deploy fighters to protect it but ground/sea based anti-air would be disastrous for it I think.
@TheGecko213
@TheGecko213 Жыл бұрын
"""""Tactically, it would be a HUGE target as well.""" So is Moscow and Beijing 😂
@Pridefallen975
@Pridefallen975 Жыл бұрын
Yup very awe-inspiring
@user-gi4wb3uc2s
@user-gi4wb3uc2s Жыл бұрын
핵에너지가 있어면 날으는 전함을 만들수 없는건가?
@jackprescott9652
@jackprescott9652 Жыл бұрын
How the Avengers managed to move his aircarrier throught air without being hit by his foes rockets?
@moniquevieara4634
@moniquevieara4634 Жыл бұрын
Not if it had radar similar to AWAC. Although it would not be maneuverable because of its size
@tibo1353
@tibo1353 Жыл бұрын
The Mothership 🚀
@harleyrdr1
@harleyrdr1 4 ай бұрын
The amount of fuel a flying aircraft carrier would need outweighs the weight of the whole thing itself. Leave this to Marvel comics.
@graasroots
@graasroots Жыл бұрын
I wouldn't hold your breath waiting for this one
@agravemisunderstanding9668
@agravemisunderstanding9668 Жыл бұрын
The closest thing to a practical and useful flying aircraft carrier was a soviet concept design that used the ground effect to fly above water, this would allow the carrier to travel much faster than any conventional carrier and with minimal fuel cost, (+and it could fly over mines and torpedoes I think) while still being stable, safe and capable of carrying refueling and rearming state of the art full sized fighter jets + all the other crazy shit aircraft carriers do and more. & It could float the idea of an actually flying carrier is ridiculous for multiple reasons: Fuel use would be insane, A flying aircraft carrier could easily be shot down by a missile, and unlike a normal carrier the crew wouldn't have time to abandon ship or salvage planes since they would be falling to earth 3mud air refueling does the same job for a much lower cost and the fuel tanker are much harder to hit, (the only thing it can't do is rearm planes) 4, if you went the route of a large plane carrying parasite fighters, they would be hopelessly out competed by a larger more advanced and more equipped fighter jet taking of from a runway, 5 today is all about stealth, missiles can be fired from over the horizon and can be almost undetectable, the best way not to get seen and shot down is not to be detected, good luck building a stealthy flying aircraft carrier, And 5 an airship wouldn't be much faster than a ship
@jarrodcross1482
@jarrodcross1482 Жыл бұрын
Still those ground effect vehicles failed too, aka the Caspian sea monster, if they stop moving they are just a sitting floating/duck, plus they only worked well in calm flat/water conditions, had a very limited range ... combat hovercrafts n landing vehicles also were just a passing fad though offered lower speed but more consistent performance plus could leave the water to some degree.
@ngriffo45
@ngriffo45 Жыл бұрын
The Russians don't even have a working naval aircraft carrier
@AndroidAntill
@AndroidAntill Жыл бұрын
They could camouflage the carrier like they do in the avengers? Lol
@jarrodcross1482
@jarrodcross1482 Жыл бұрын
@@ngriffo45 exactly largely because the Russians for all their faults which are many don't seek or want to leverage large parts of the world for geopolitical power ... they do want some of the vauge resource rich enthno-russian territories lost in the breakup/fall of the USSR/CCCP ... still they sit on a crazy amount of intercontinental nuclear weapons etc so they are sitting pretty ... while the USA rubs up against China in the South Chinese sea ... that's a long way from Neu York let alone Washington
@jarrodcross1482
@jarrodcross1482 Жыл бұрын
Plus developing both a sea based carrier and the jets that can/could fly of it is expensive... very expensive ... especially in the age of the 6th generation combat fighters n bombers ... why bother when your own country spans 4 time zones ... fronts onto most other problem nations or allies ... aircraft carriers are expensive, air bases on your borders less so
@jakeglassmoyer9984
@jakeglassmoyer9984 Жыл бұрын
Could you imagine the wind on that deck? Imagine a plane off vector getting sucked into one of those fan assemblies? Awesome carnage! Sailer would just be diced up and sprayed as fish food over the sea!
@ngriffo45
@ngriffo45 Жыл бұрын
You could drop a jet tho
@cletusspucklerstablejeaniu1059
@cletusspucklerstablejeaniu1059 Жыл бұрын
But at least they can spell 'sailor.'
@bekeleguasil3895
@bekeleguasil3895 Жыл бұрын
I like the idea. I believe, it can be done. I suggest to build top cover with semi synthetic glass that is bullet proof and designed aerodynamically for speed.
@davidbloxham6114
@davidbloxham6114 10 ай бұрын
Wow! Such technology.
@Fitzger00
@Fitzger00 Жыл бұрын
This is absolutely absurd. I am all for RD projects with long term goals but we can barley lift one person for longer than 30 minutes with this type of tech. I do get content is hard to create and I appreciate your plight.
@hieulengotran5093
@hieulengotran5093 Жыл бұрын
EURO. STUDIO. KHẮC. thêm 144 số không
@omarbruno3534
@omarbruno3534 Жыл бұрын
Capt. America would be happy, soon he will command a fleet.
@stardaggerrihannsu2363
@stardaggerrihannsu2363 Жыл бұрын
Captain Marvel is running the show now.
@npg192
@npg192 7 ай бұрын
Imagine the cost when one of those gets hit by a missile and goes down. Or even worse just has a malfunction and crashes. Looks expensive.
@mahokhan9122
@mahokhan9122 7 ай бұрын
Very super.. USA's
@tomthum5128
@tomthum5128 Жыл бұрын
It only makes sense if you use anti gravity
@jasonrock5220
@jasonrock5220 Жыл бұрын
Or use nuclear power
@jerrylunsford9990
@jerrylunsford9990 Жыл бұрын
@@jasonrock5220 ⁰
@christbenitez8797
@christbenitez8797 Жыл бұрын
@@jasonrock5220 half of the aircraft fleet of the U.S is nuclear power.
@delroyshay5870
@delroyshay5870 Жыл бұрын
At that point it may as well be a space craft. You could not even walk on the platform without a oxygen mask. & You will need special clothing to stop you freezing at high altitude. Stupid video, concept that will never work.
@Cesarsald754
@Cesarsald754 6 ай бұрын
Roswell shit...right there....😊
@hauntedcaptainphoenix5363
@hauntedcaptainphoenix5363 Жыл бұрын
Are their any plans to launch planes from the side of the aircraft carrier?
@chillonfunsmart4929
@chillonfunsmart4929 7 ай бұрын
The last thing we need to do is keep funding the military industrial complex.
@us3rG
@us3rG 7 ай бұрын
The military all over the word plays a huge role in technological development
@chillonfunsmart4929
@chillonfunsmart4929 7 ай бұрын
Yeah, but its a walled garden. For us much as they innovate they stifle our access to it.@@us3rG
@karinchaney101
@karinchaney101 Жыл бұрын
The newest carriers NEVER need to be refuled.
@fadedtiger3181
@fadedtiger3181 Жыл бұрын
i love this idea. if they can figure out viable ways of doing this, it will be a fantastic springboard for future space born carriers.
@kazuya-bi8lx
@kazuya-bi8lx Жыл бұрын
If we can activate antigravity, an air carrier might not even be a dream.
@linashelly1852
@linashelly1852 Жыл бұрын
Extreammmmmly Impressive! Go USA!
@MartinmwendaKubai-vr9ez
@MartinmwendaKubai-vr9ez 11 ай бұрын
Thanks for welcome to Washington DC
@dhirvyas2031
@dhirvyas2031 Жыл бұрын
Would be cool to see but we’ll have to wait for perhaps a couple centuries to witness this
@chazayah5985
@chazayah5985 Жыл бұрын
Ww3 won’t let that happen sorry
@dhirvyas2031
@dhirvyas2031 Жыл бұрын
@@chazayah5985 sad
@exxzxxe
@exxzxxe Жыл бұрын
THE MAIN CONCERN IS AVOIDING FLYING COWS!
@spongerobert
@spongerobert Жыл бұрын
And/or pigs
@noorjaved1184
@noorjaved1184 Жыл бұрын
God bless America 🇺🇸
@gerlandkent6377
@gerlandkent6377 Жыл бұрын
DONT, MESS WITH THE US 🇺🇸
@darryltibbits7051
@darryltibbits7051 Жыл бұрын
Plus the amount of personnel that has to be on an aircraft carrier you're just asking for the entire crew to be slaughtered when a gust of wind causes this aircraft to lose control in the air.
@billymadison8574
@billymadison8574 Жыл бұрын
Nah. Pretty sure the USAF keeps Dr. Strange on retainer in case of strong gusts and/or melodramatic flying villains👌
@simoncpu_was_here
@simoncpu_was_here Жыл бұрын
"The carrier has arrived." -Protoss Stargate
@hieulengotran5093
@hieulengotran5093 Жыл бұрын
mất CÂY. CAO SU. VN. SCIENCE. WORLD. NGƯỜI VẬN CHUYÊN. Ô TÔ. WIFI. NUÔI
@lordjarred
@lordjarred Жыл бұрын
Power overwhelming!!!
@onlinesavant
@onlinesavant 5 ай бұрын
Keep in mind that the Lockheed CL 1201 was conceptualized in the 1960's. Think about all the advancements in materials science, and computer modeling, that have occurred since that time. I speculate that it is very possible to build a viable, flying, aircraft carrier now.
@tanpengjoo7205
@tanpengjoo7205 4 ай бұрын
Anything impossible , MADE IN USA ARE POSSIBLE N POWERFUL
@xshelwynx
@xshelwynx Жыл бұрын
I think it would only work if it was a drone carrier.
@coffeeseven
@coffeeseven Жыл бұрын
Thank God. I had extra money this year I was just dieing to spend on taxes for military toys.
@jayleeclough1199
@jayleeclough1199 Жыл бұрын
Stfu if Russia or china attacked you would be not worried about tax money because you would be stuck hiding from nuclear fall out .
@user-wx2xf1th5j
@user-wx2xf1th5j 2 ай бұрын
🇨🇻🇬🇼🇺🇸Hugo, USA, USA, God bless, ✌️
@wavynavy_bo_bang7431
@wavynavy_bo_bang7431 6 ай бұрын
Damn these carriers are crazy
@cmdrsabot4757
@cmdrsabot4757 Жыл бұрын
Just FYI to all watching, the idea of a flying 'aircraft carrier' doesn't mean a literal carrier strapped to engines. It's more along the lines of a super sized transport plane that can deploy fighter jets from its underside. Although a flying hover carrier would be cool, it would be incredibly difficult with today's tech and needless to mention would cost the gdp of a small country just to operate and maintain.
@jarrodcross1482
@jarrodcross1482 Жыл бұрын
We already have those ... aka fast attack jets that can in air refuel off a mother tanker or tankers to extend their range/standoff time but the concept of a flying air base is about as practical as a flying aircraft carrier ... As in what's the point? The crew can only be in air for so many hours ... the mechanical engines n gubbins need maintenance n downtime, both can easily be defeated with tracking n missiles ... I'll believe it when Elon Musk tells us its the future :p and he's not even that dumb!
@jarrodcross1482
@jarrodcross1482 Жыл бұрын
The biggest viable plane that could carry other planes is the Russian Antonov ... it could carry 2 m1a1 Abrams tanks, is slow, guzzles fuel, needs innordately long runways ... so could technically carry 2 mid sized fighters, if you could figure out how to launch them as it has a front lifting nosecone which that ain't happening! Or you just push em out the back ramp and hope the engines fire up ... oddly your pragmatic idea of a plane based plane system is even worse than a flying aircraft carrier! Which is sorta impressive! :)
@georgematthews2877
@georgematthews2877 Жыл бұрын
And people are grinching about putting out a few bucks for college debt relief!!🤬
@IAMMASONDAVIDSONGOBIN
@IAMMASONDAVIDSONGOBIN 7 ай бұрын
THEY'VE HAD THESE FOR A VERY LONG TIME...
@EagleFighterJet
@EagleFighterJet 6 ай бұрын
wow these designs are great
@markanderson3848
@markanderson3848 Жыл бұрын
Straight out of an episode of Dr Who .
@hell2freelance533
@hell2freelance533 Жыл бұрын
5:40 The CL-1201 could have been what flew over Phoenix, Arizona in "The Phoenix Lights" incident.
@wytche3546
@wytche3546 Жыл бұрын
I used to live in Chandler heights Arizona, I had as close a look to it as anyone could have had. It flew right past me and it was very big, totally silent. But not shaped like an aircraft carrier. Shaped like the stealth bomber, but big enough at least, to park two bombers on each wing.
@hell2freelance533
@hell2freelance533 Жыл бұрын
@@wytche3546 Wow. Have there been any other sightings that you know of? Or could you recommend any videos or sources? I find the incident fascinating and I really want to know more.
@user-fu6zm6bu5v
@user-fu6zm6bu5v 4 ай бұрын
Insan project !
@user-mu2rx9xs5d
@user-mu2rx9xs5d 6 ай бұрын
Advanced military weaponry minimizes risks for our troops during missions. Their precision and versatility empower our soldiers to succeed in various scenarios with reduced casualties.
@DieterSoegemeier
@DieterSoegemeier Жыл бұрын
Until they allow us to have gravity drives none of this will never exist.
@stanleydolan5609
@stanleydolan5609 Жыл бұрын
Could understand a smaller version with armed drones, but I’m sure that it’s already underway.
@eliascommentonly4652
@eliascommentonly4652 Жыл бұрын
🇪🇺🇬🇷👋 they could build a small carrier .1 big plane carrying 1 small fighter jet like space shuttle plane it's the only logical solution 1 big plane carrying a fighter jet close to battle and then leave it to fly to save fuel 🇪🇺🇪🇺🇪🇺🇪🇺🇬🇷🇬🇷🇬🇷🇬🇷👋🙏🙏🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿☮☮☮🇺🇦🇷🇺🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸👑👋🇬🇧🇬🇧🇬🇧🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿
@floydjohnson7888
@floydjohnson7888 Жыл бұрын
1:49 What's the protocol for greeting an ally and then joining the fight? Is it just flag-dips or a full seven blanks? In either version, I figure these days, it's only a second or two to the "and then sock it to the Bad Guys" part.
@chiko1354
@chiko1354 3 ай бұрын
When I was a kid reading Marvel comic books all the time. They had such a thing. Can I tell you, as a kid, that was amazing to see Now is an adult watching the first Marvel movies and seeing it on screen, wow. I can't even imagine if they could actually do this in real life
@napeekapunpimtongnara9111
@napeekapunpimtongnara9111 Жыл бұрын
An aircraft carrier that flies so incredible it must have been very clever and brilliantly engineered. It's a truly amazing sci-fi-like design. An amazing project But I think America has very good thinkers and designers.
@HelminthCombos
@HelminthCombos Жыл бұрын
This whole thing is bs dude
@SEPK09
@SEPK09 Жыл бұрын
It's fictional rubbish. Dislike crap content like this.
@lethalchocobo1886
@lethalchocobo1886 8 ай бұрын
LOL. Not the brightest bulb, are ya?
@morenacl7417
@morenacl7417 Жыл бұрын
Title should have added ".. Ready for Action in 2122, with Anti Grav Technology.. maybe"
@mikebar42
@mikebar42 Жыл бұрын
Lol
@ROMVS
@ROMVS 10 ай бұрын
I watch these vids so the thumbnails keep on coming lol
@anthonysadowski5983
@anthonysadowski5983 11 ай бұрын
C-130 with rear end launch and retreval in the rear,with the plane still using 50 cal for protection
@marklandrebe3521
@marklandrebe3521 Жыл бұрын
Seems like a bad idea; because it may not be able to stay airborne, if hit. True, an aircraft carrier may not be able to float, if hit, but the latter sounds better.
@jasoncampbell1464
@jasoncampbell1464 Жыл бұрын
Better to sink than to take a 50k feet dive into the ocean
@jarrodcross1482
@jarrodcross1482 Жыл бұрын
Exactly, while the ocean holds you up ... the sky let's you fall ... It's simple really, take one countries advanced weapon system then develop a cheap counter measure ... aka 100 million dollar fighter vs 500k anti fighter rocket ... May not take it out but will stand it off/disrupt it's ability to be effective... think the NVA with Russian Sam's vs the USAF in Vietnam... they backed off the most advanced n militaria aggressive country on earth with basic fire n forget rockets ...
@gearshiftproductions353
@gearshiftproductions353 Жыл бұрын
Like someone already said in the comments, it's easier to swim then to fly
@williamabaker12
@williamabaker12 Жыл бұрын
😂😂😂 As long as the laws of physics apply, current tech is nowhere near making this a possibility.
@Gesso64
@Gesso64 Жыл бұрын
Since when is anything from the the military current tech
@jarrodcross1482
@jarrodcross1482 Жыл бұрын
Exactly why bother when you can have f35s n etc based on land in friendly nations ... the aircraft carrier concept died with 2nd world war ... when long range missiles nuclear n biological let alone intercontinental made that concept/doctrine redundant.
@jarrodcross1482
@jarrodcross1482 Жыл бұрын
Haha the laws of physics always apply, just ask Elon Musk who pretends they don't ... but year in year out his products n promises either underperform, are years late and then garbage ... he can't even get his space trucks out, aka EV trucks n Utes with a ripped off design asthetic from Battlestar Galactica (OG) ... let alone his autonomous self driving software or the helper robot nobody wants in their house!
@williamabaker12
@williamabaker12 Жыл бұрын
@@Gesso64 US military tech is always ahead of the field, but not far enough ahead for anything like this. Unless they've perfected some sort of antigravity tech, this isn't happening. More to the point, if they've perfected antigravity tech, this wouldn't be necessary. Lol
@percybaldwin2237
@percybaldwin2237 Жыл бұрын
The true laws of physics are classified.
@vaqarhussain
@vaqarhussain Жыл бұрын
I wish all countries would spend their defense budget to make this world beautiful and support people instead of fighting and killing each other. They should live peacefully and love each other. Helping each other'.
@farzandali8078
@farzandali8078 7 ай бұрын
How amazing ❤️
@jessmason2112
@jessmason2112 Жыл бұрын
Break it down to 10 fighters per plane carrier. Have 5 slots on each end or wing for each aircraft that raises the fighters into the wings for maintenance and weapon loading.
@theinformationcollector833
@theinformationcollector833 Жыл бұрын
That's one of the key factors in my prototype --- it can't be The Avengers, but it can be. If you're interested in how feasible my idea is I'll be glad to send you a free copy of my thriller CODE NAME: Monte Rico, where I invented five new weapons. I actually did the calculations for how this would work --- tweak the parameters, not that hard.
@jessmason2112
@jessmason2112 Жыл бұрын
@@theinformationcollector833 Now imagine a sorty of 4 or 5 of these planes with 4 drones each plane. Any military skirmish could be over in hours. Like a symphony orchestra 🎻.
@theinformationcollector833
@theinformationcollector833 Жыл бұрын
@@jessmason2112 Very true --- and that tech is WWII level. Marilyn Monroe was discovered cause she worked in a drone plant the photographer went to shoot pictures at. They were basically RC models used for target practice, but still drones.
@jessmason2112
@jessmason2112 Жыл бұрын
@@theinformationcollector833 Regardless of when the idea came about. If that idea with today's technology would make that sorty untouchable. What a major deterrent that would be to take out a terrorist group or area in one shot with no boots on the ground.
@Mysucculentchinesemeal
@Mysucculentchinesemeal Жыл бұрын
The F-35 is so lethal it kills the enemy and the pilot.
@linashelly1852
@linashelly1852 Жыл бұрын
Extreamly impressive! Go USA!!!
@chanopokes4846
@chanopokes4846 Жыл бұрын
The energy consumption for sustainable flight is untenable. Not to mention a giant stationary target. So it would need to have an anti gravity zero fuel propulsion system and complete stealth technology. Yep. Super realistic. I just spent 3 hours at the DMV cause the website is broken . Lol. GTFOH
@jamesedwardsiii8532
@jamesedwardsiii8532 Жыл бұрын
Lol, yea, right! 🤣🤣🤪🤣. We can't even fix our roads and highways! How are we supposed to make buildings fly!?
@Mr.Raider007
@Mr.Raider007 Жыл бұрын
Blame your local politicians on that one.
@garyreeve6793
@garyreeve6793 6 ай бұрын
It's called The Military Industrial Complex
@crucialgamers6991
@crucialgamers6991 2 ай бұрын
That would be amazing. But definitely generations away before you see a flying aircraft carrier.
@eduardomorales8443
@eduardomorales8443 Жыл бұрын
Flying aircraft carriers gotta be hella durable
@markwoods4574
@markwoods4574 Жыл бұрын
With the F35 being the joint fighter program for many `allied countries the overspend was outrageous , what should of happened was a fixed cost with a time penalty clause this would of saved all the countries involved money. I/m from the UK and I’m a Professor of Economics that’s usual in Business and at the end of the day the F35 was invented to be sold a business opportunity.
@loganbyrne3054
@loganbyrne3054 Жыл бұрын
The lockheed CL-1201 was a waste because of the lost space due to wingspan. They say "size" does matter.
@TuocNguyen-ln4mh
@TuocNguyen-ln4mh 10 ай бұрын
Flying carrier sẽ là "bữa tiệc béo bở thơm ngon" cho máy bay và tên lửa đối phương
@IamKlaus007
@IamKlaus007 10 ай бұрын
The detail of digital construction is only limited to current technology and mans imaginative creativity.
@lostthedog
@lostthedog Жыл бұрын
Those carriers are from the Winter Soldier movie.
@roybladea6180
@roybladea6180 Жыл бұрын
We are a long way from a real Avengers type carrier.
@frun
@frun Жыл бұрын
Flying tanks and submarines are the next objectives.
@joetucker334
@joetucker334 Жыл бұрын
We would like to see The end of Drama of that Monster carry out Battle on the Sea water .. with Enemy Full stop !!!
@HelminthCombos
@HelminthCombos Жыл бұрын
The only reason you want it to fly is to get somewhere faster over land otherwise while flying its a massive blip on the radar of any country it gets near let alone fly over. Zero point in a flying carrier. Sailing is stealthier.
@mrrr964
@mrrr964 Жыл бұрын
imagine how heavy it is to fly😳😳
@ShadowWolf-om4ub
@ShadowWolf-om4ub Жыл бұрын
Considering its running on 4 turbine propellers. Im sure it'll be fine
@dusk07
@dusk07 Жыл бұрын
Most likely nuclear reactors aswell
@ShadowWolf-om4ub
@ShadowWolf-om4ub Жыл бұрын
@@dusk07 true
@keahi7646
@keahi7646 Жыл бұрын
I can't even imagine. Just the turbine blades will be millions of pounds. I can't believe they will fly around with multiple air wings aboard, possibly try to have another carrier 100 miles away for stowing aircraft, and just be used to refuel or get really close to targets. I was in the gear, so I'm very interested to see.
@jermaineallen2915
@jermaineallen2915 11 ай бұрын
Then how much Fuel going in it at a time are maybe it have Fuel constantly going in it.
@armans244
@armans244 Жыл бұрын
No matter how advanced we think US is, building a flying aircraft carrier is literally IMPOSSIBLE in present. Maybe in 100-200 years we can. But not today nor in the near future.
@justinbulgherini1298
@justinbulgherini1298 Жыл бұрын
You have to be out of your mind if you think we will have this any time soon, if we ever do. Think about the government trying to get all the auto manufacturers to go EV. The cost and amount of fuel to keep this thing in the air would bankrupt all of us and send our taxes soaring. Think about it, the only reason why air craft carriers work and are convenient is because they float naturally.
@dianalindeman1644
@dianalindeman1644 Жыл бұрын
Justin Bulgherini That's the scary thing! The Biden administration is insane!
200k US 6th Generation Fighter Jets Shocked The World
10:11
Front Cost
Рет қаралды 1,9 МЛН
How does a Tank work? (M1A2 Abrams)
9:49
Jared Owen
Рет қаралды 52 МЛН
ОДИН ДОМА #shorts
00:34
Паша Осадчий
Рет қаралды 5 МЛН
Buy Feastables, Win Unlimited Money
00:51
MrBeast 2
Рет қаралды 70 МЛН
NEW $Billions F-22 Raptor Is Ready! Why CHINA Is Afraid NOW!
13:13
US 4 $Billion 6th Generation Fighter Jet is What China Fears Most!
11:11
12 Mind Blowing Concepts Of The Future You Must See
13:05
99Techspot
Рет қаралды 1,7 МЛН
Top 10 Fastest Planes in the World (2023)
19:04
Imperium
Рет қаралды 696 М.
Meet the X-47B: America's $1.5 Billion Stealth Drone
10:03
US Military News
Рет қаралды 2 МЛН
These NATO Submarines Can Destroy Russia in 30 Seconds
10:48
Front Cost
Рет қаралды 995 М.
US $300 Billions 6th Generation Fighter Jet Is Finally Here!
11:02
Front Cost
Рет қаралды 1,8 МЛН
US Navy Harrier Jet Lands On Stool
3:13
Sky News
Рет қаралды 2 МЛН