US Patriot vs Russia’s S-400

US Patriot vs Russia’s S-400 - which is better?

Рет қаралды 706,320

Күн бұрын

US Patriot vs Russia’s S-400 - which is better?
► Subscribe to Grid 88: goo.gl/UYzU9H
US Patriot vs Russia’s S-400 - which is better?
The Patriot and S-400 are highly sophisticated air defense systems that have the ability to intercept and neutralize wide range of aerial threats. These systems use advanced radars and sensors to detect and track incoming threats, and can launch interceptor missiles to destroy them before they can cause any damage. The Patriot is a designed by Raytheon and it’s name is derived from the radar used in the system. A single patriot battery consists of radar set, an engagement control station, launcher station, antenna mast group, and interceptor missiles themselves. The Radar finds and tracks targets, and helps the missiles hit their targets accurately. The Engagement Control Station calculates trajectories for interceptors and controls the launch sequence. The Launcher Stations hold and launch the missiles. The Antenna Mast Group is the main communications backbone for the whole unit. The Patriot is armed with a variety of missiles capable of destroying variety of aerial threats.
While, S-400 Triumf is built by Russia as an upgrade to the S-300 family. The S-400 is composed of various components that work together to achieve its target. The first component is a launch vehicle, which carries the missiles. The second component is a command and control post mounted on a vehicle, serving as the system's heart. Finally, the system comes with a set of radars with varied ranges to intercept targets from multiple directions at high altitudes. The Patriot is outfitted with a passive electronically scanned array radar. It can track up to 100 targets within a range of 93mi. On the other hand, S-400 uses a combination of radars with varied ranges. The 96L6E radar is particularly notable for its ability to detect and track low-flying cruise missiles and fighter jets within 186mi. The Grave Stone radar is another impressive sensor, which can detect and track ballistic missiles and stealth aircraft within 249mi of range. While the Big Bird acquisition radar can locate and identify 300 targets simultaneously within the distance of 373mi.
The missile can travel at speeds over 3,150mph with flight altitude of 15mi, and has a range of more than 99mi. It has range of 37mi and can engage incoming targets at high altitudes with speeds over 3,150mph. Whereas, S-400 system is armed with a variety of missiles mounted on a truck. For long range engagement, the system is armed with 40N6E missile, which is equipped with active radar homing to intercept air targets with blistering speed of 2,700mph. This missile has claimed range of 249mi and can target high value spy or support aircraft . How does it work? The patriot’s radar detects a target and gathers information about it’s location, speed, and trajectory. The radar sends data to a command center, where operators assess it and decide if an approaching object is hostile. Once the engagement is authorized, the launcher fires two missiles in a "ripple" 4.2 seconds apart to destroy the incoming object.
On the other side, the S-400 system operates by initially identifying a target through the use of suitable radars at hand. The information is then passed to the command and control center, which determines whether the target is friendly or hostile and chooses to engage the target. Subsequently, with the assistance of the engagement radar, the suitable missile is launched to neutralize the threat. For detailed conclusion, watch the complete video.
Chapters
Intro 0:00
Patriot Components 0:41
S-400 Components 1:32
Patriot Radar 2:12
S-400 Radars 3:09
Patriot Missiles 4:01
S-400 Missiles 5:06
How does Patriot work 5:59
How does S-400 work 6:21
Patriot Cost 6:43
S-400 Cost 7:13
Conclusion 7:34
FOLLOW us on Social Media:
► Facebook: thegrid88
► Twitter: grid_88
► Become a Patreon: www.patreon.com/grid88
► Germany’s Leopard 2 vs Russia’s T 90 Tank - Ready for final showdown?
• Germany’s Leopard 2 vs...
► Eurofighter Typhoon vs Russia’s Su-30 - which would win?
• Eurofighter Typhoon vs...
► Can Flakpanzer Gepard Kill Russian Drones?
• Can Germany's Gepard d...
► B-21 Raider Stealth Bomber - 10 Things You Need to Know
• B-21 Raider: Meet the ...
Playlists
► Military
• Military
Credits
1)US DOD
creativecommons.org/licenses/b...
All content on Grid 88 is presented for only educational purposes. The appearance of US DOD doesn’t imply or constitute the respective entities or this channel’s endorsement.
#Patriot #S400 #SAM
► SUBSCRIBE so you never miss another video: goo.gl/UYzU9H

Пікірлер: 2 600

@alexkor380 Жыл бұрын

One of the main advantages of the S-400 is that missiles are launched in any direction in azimuth. 360 degrees without launcher rotation. The petriot does not have this - to change direction by 180 degrees - you need to turn the entire launcher. On the S-400, the radars also scans all 360 degrees. At the Petriot, the radar looks only for 1 sector - this is shown in the video.

@Ksins1 Жыл бұрын

Iran takes the second tanker..Iran seized the vessel Niovi, which was in transit from the Persian Gulf to the United Arab Emirates. Next, this tanker was supposed to move to the States, but the Persians had completely different plans. And again, the scheme is worked out - the tanker is refueled, paid for and only then arrested. And the most interesting thing is that neither Muhammad bin Zayed al-Nahyan, the head of the UAE,, nor their state publication said a word about Iran's behavior. Well, they took it and took it away,, as if it was intended that way.This is confirmation that Iran's actions are clearly coordinated with the Russians, with the Arabs, and with the Chinese. The support is total. And even 60 military bases and 50,000 Americans did not confuse Tehran.The Fifth US Navy remained to observe what was happening from afar,, after a "nice conversation with the Persians." The confused US military begins timid radio negotiations with the Islamic Revolutionary Guards Corps in order for the tanker to be released, the Americans were sent to milk the bulls."

@evgenyifrost3679 Жыл бұрын

@@Ksins1 причём тут Иран дурачёк?😂

@Its_shiki_time4876 Жыл бұрын

Doesn't matter if the s-400 can't see its target regardless while the patriot will see its target w

@user-oq7uw2sy9s Жыл бұрын

@@Its_shiki_time4876 Oh, yes! Now we all know how the Patriot saw Kinzhal, fired 32 missiles at him and no result. The Patriot has great reputational losses.

@Its_shiki_time4876 Жыл бұрын

@Семён Реввоенсовет there were 16 fired at it and is shot down 6. The rest missed the patriot haven't fired often but when it does it hits

@velimirkolundzija4451 Жыл бұрын

First of all, 1 battery S 400 consists of 8 launch trucks, which means that for $ 400 million that it cost in 2022, you get the opportunity to launch 32 missiles at once, the second one is not said at what altitude the S 400 can hit the target and that is up to 55 km And perhaps the most important thing is the speed of a rocket that can fly at speeds of up to 8,700 km/h!!! In addition, the S 400 will never be in position without the buk m2 and Tor m2 system. And that's why I think Russia has built the best air defense systems in the world and all three batteries of these systems Together they are about $700 million.

@arabulbulian2315 Жыл бұрын

You have no clue in the difference between theory and reality. Which is good for the rest of us that do.

@velimirkolundzija4451 Жыл бұрын

@@arabulbulian2315 So what can we do when the U.S. and Russia will never deploy their systems at 10 km distance and fire the same missiles at them? But Russia did something similar in Syria with the S 300 PMU 2 system and they had an effect of 98%. I don't know if you're a fan of everything we've got in 2015.

@sergejlavrov3446 Жыл бұрын

@@arabulbulian2315 - Dream your wet dream of supremacy American - who cares.

@surgeon9039 Жыл бұрын

@@arabulbulian2315 S-300/S-400 proved in combat that they are WAY better than Patriot, judging not by theory and numbers on paper.

@yeahright4659 Жыл бұрын

@@arabulbulian2315 OK. Maybe he has no clue, but, ask Turks which is better, or perhaps ask Saudis how the heck Houthi rocket hit their capitol city during an F1 race even though the patriot missiles were locked and ready.

@delta0307 Жыл бұрын

You guys forgot to mention the single most practical feature of russian air defense systems; the angle of the rockets relative to ground. Patriot missiles are angled 45 degrees more or less in a specific direction that is why it comes with just one radar system that is focused in one direction only. This means that if you want a full 360 coverage you'll need 2 or 3 patriot systems pointed in multiple directions. On the contrary, the s400 is angled 90 deg upwards w/c means it's missiles can go in any direction of the incoming threat. This is also the reason why it has 3 radar systems since it will overlap it's detection on a almost 360 degree field of view. This is more practical in that you can have 1 s400 system cover an entire area compared to patriot where you need to really anticipate where the threat will be coming from

@drudriver3660 11 ай бұрын

You forgot to mention the single most practical feature of the Patriot….it don’t shoot it’s own ass

@delta0307 11 ай бұрын

@@drudriver3660 it doesn't, but there's a couple of videos of patriots falling and hitting civilian target after misfire

@user-lg3wk7oi7c 11 ай бұрын

@@delta0307 Yes, 30 Patriot missiles were fired in Ukraine, none of which hit the Dagger, and in the end the Dagger destroyed the entire Patriot battery! All the missiles from the Patriot, fell on civilian buildings,

@delta0307 11 ай бұрын

@@user-lg3wk7oi7c i know it has been damaged but not totally destroyed? Up until now I wonder why there is no video or photo of it

@user-lg3wk7oi7c 11 ай бұрын

@@delta0307 Because they delete everything related to the truth about Russia here, but everything is on Rutube,

@sotir9299 5 ай бұрын

You forgot to mention that S-400 is also used in tandem with short-range systems to intercept smaller targets. And you completely ignored the fact that unlike the Patriot system, S-400 has a 360 degree coverage, which makes repositioning unnecessary.

@piuswanyaga8361 4 ай бұрын

SURE

@arjunhamal2497 4 ай бұрын

S400 is best without a doubt

@ololo_lu 4 ай бұрын

@@arjunhamal2497lol

@thanosfickda 4 ай бұрын

@@arjunhamal2497 i have a doubt, where is the strong evidence, tests against other missiles, targets?

@kgapholasegadimanebethuel3873 Ай бұрын

And cheaper @@arjunhamal2497

@itch4travel Жыл бұрын

US air defense system did not work as intended when Saudi's oil refinerry were attacked by low cost Yemeni missiles, so Saudi went to S400 of Russia.

@isuruthiwanka2595 Жыл бұрын

Yup

@panicjova31210pozega Жыл бұрын

Those systems are not intended for shooting down small and cheap BPL... One Patriot or S400 missile costs 1 to 2 million dollars. It is intended for targeting ballistic missiles and enemy aircraft - not for small BPLs. Other systems are used for these purposes - type BUK m2/m3, TOR m2 or Pancir SM. Another reason why Saudi Arabia decided on Russian systems (there is no blackmail and conditioning from Russia, and the technical capabilities of the S 400).

@johnoliver4739 Жыл бұрын

And the S300 nor 400 is working on shooting down GMLRS MLRS/HIMARs rockets in Ukraine.. 🤷

@johannjimenez2850 Жыл бұрын

matagal nang ginagamit iyang Patriot sa Saudi Arabia., sa katunayan nga eh may nakita akong Videos na actual na ini Intercept ng Patriot ang mga Missiles., kung di pa iyan effective eh bakit di kumuha ang Saudi Arabia sa S-400 ng Russia noon? mabibilang lang po sa mga Daliri na Pumalyar ang Makina na iyan., kasi bawat Equipments ay nanganga-ilangan iyan ng mga Mintenance ba., eh ang S-400 nga na naka deployed sa Syria noon bakit di namalayan ang pagpasok ng mga Israeli F-35's sa Syria? sa Ukraine nga bakit di napabagsak ng S-400 ang mga Turkish made Byraktar TB2 Combat Drones?

@johannjimenez2850 Жыл бұрын

Hi-Mars Missile nga eh di kayang ma Intercept ng S-400 na iyan., subukan mong mag halungkat ng mga News sa Google 😅

@wafulaisaac5185 Жыл бұрын

S-400 is the best in terms of cost , distance and accuracy,,I will go for S-400

@kjererrt7804 Жыл бұрын

in terms of everything because the patriot is utter crap.

@stefanlesikov1851 Жыл бұрын

What is more important between human life and cheap price ?

@ulikemyname6744 Жыл бұрын

No evidence for that. Also direct price comparisons cannot be made especially from different countries. Those are not consumer products which you can go and buy from the shop.

@kjererrt7804 Жыл бұрын

@@ulikemyname6744 that proves that patriot is worse than the s-300.

@ulikemyname6744 Жыл бұрын

@@kjererrt7804 How?

@Hunter-iz2ub Жыл бұрын

Obviously S-400 🔥 Coming soon S-500🔥🔥

@dhmo123 Жыл бұрын

Hahahaha, thx for this joke you made my day!

@romankovalev7894 Жыл бұрын

@@dhmo123 You are clearly not aware that the C500 has already been entering the troops for six months. C550 is being tested

@low_host Жыл бұрын

@@dhmo123 это не шутка это твой ад

@Ksins1 Жыл бұрын

@romankovalev7894 Жыл бұрын

@@Ksins1 The West has not yet fully realized that their unfair world based "on rules" and in which they put themselves as an elite and above the law is over. The UAE is well aware that he is a fat pig and will be killed for the sake of oil simply by declaring a demon to the applause of Europe. So it was with Libya, Iraq, there are enough examples. The Mediterranean kingdoms applied to the BRICS, they decided on the side of the conflict. Like most of the "real" world. 50 bases? They are suicide bombers at these bases. hostages of the situation. Of course, the Russians will hand over all the necessary weapons to attack the bases of the invaders, this game can be played together. There is no normal air defense on any of them. For the millions of people killed and for the million children who died of hunger as a result of only two invasions of Iraq will have to pay. And Iran plays an important role here. The enemy of my enemy is my friend

@Crypt0n1an Жыл бұрын

The fastest variant of the S-400 missiles is 4500 mph not 2700 mph as you stated. It is 42% faster than the patriot missiles.

@Whatdoesthismean420 Жыл бұрын

Yeah just like their “hypersonic missiles” Lol.

@rexmasters1541 Жыл бұрын

You have no idea about the subject material since not a single Patriot missile has ever flown that slow.

@lbwar15 Жыл бұрын

Seeing as how the true top speed of patriot is classified I’m not sure where you are getting your info.

@Crypt0n1an Жыл бұрын

@@rexmasters1541 These are the well known and published speeds of the patriot and S400. If you know something the world doesn't please enlighten us.

@Crypt0n1an Жыл бұрын

@@lbwar15 If the patriot missile was capable of higher speeds than the whole world is aware of by now(published on multiple sites through multiple sources), we would have heard something of it. Do you think the rest of the world is stupid or is it that no one can detect or measure the speed of the patriot? Get your heads out of your asses, you insufferable Yanks and understand that at least when it comes to missiles and rockets the Russians have you beat, period. Your air Force and Navy is indeed far better but they have the most powerful army on the planet(vastly outnumber the US in artillery tanks and ground forces). I say this as a westerner who is aligned with the west but who is also a student of history and reality and other than their unwise experimentation with communism has no issue with the Russians and would consider them part of the west if only the US would stop being so effing insecure about it and let them in so that we can focus on the real threat moving forward which is China.

@Concerned_Citizen665 Жыл бұрын

Don't even worry about the s400. Even the old s300 system has a longer range, radar and greater fire rate than Patriot. US generals themselves say Patriot systems are incredibly expensive and you need a lot of them to be effective. US generals themselves say US didn't pay attention to air defence as they believe the best defence is a good offence. So they prioritised US fighter pilots instead of air defence. In particular, how to make fighters more stealth so that they can spy and sneak into other countries air space like a thief. Ask a F35 pilot "what do you do when you see a SU35 coming directly at you". They will say "We are told to...run!"

@jupiter5109 Жыл бұрын

😅😅😅 I can't stop laughing after reading the last word of your comment "RUN". 😂😂😂

@ooooooooooooooooooooooooooooow Жыл бұрын

I cannot underestimate any system, yes, the S-400 is superior in stages, but I think the comparison is unfair. At the same time, I think it is stupid to use the Patriot to shoot down a drone. A million-dollar missile shoots down a march whose value does not exceed 20,000 😅

@RTWPimpmachine 9 ай бұрын

Made up gibberish. "Ask a F35 pilot "what do you do when you see a SU35 coming directly at you". They will say "We are told to...run!"" Seeing as how the Su-35 has a garbage PESA radar that would have been inferior to most Western radars from the 1990s, I doubt it. The F-15, for example, has a 104-0 kill ratio against mostly Russian/Soviet garbage.

@Mkby88 9 ай бұрын

Ruskie bots are hilarious

@florinardelean4760 4 ай бұрын

@@Mkby88 si tu esti un prost...

@mohis4299 Жыл бұрын

I easily choose S400 for its agility, technical superiority, and cost.

@aleksandarvidakovic7632 Жыл бұрын

Patriot range-70 km, cost-3.4 bn. s-400, range-400km, height 135 km, cost 1.25 bn with i think 3x more rockets included, they come with around 70 rockets.

@sergejlavrov3446 Жыл бұрын

@@aleksandarvidakovic7632 - The famous German Iris-T is based on technology which Germany inherited from East Germany and which was developed by the Sovietunion. I know Russians and I must say they are excellent engineers and mathematicians.

@mabotiyn Жыл бұрын

From Ukraine to war, S400 is a paper Tiger. It’s crap!

@WhatGindoes Жыл бұрын

You can operate them in 5 mins,İ can't say the same about American made Patriot,and İ don't think US can make weapons such as S400 anytime soon,decades later they might.

@ulikemyname6744 Жыл бұрын

@@aleksandarvidakovic7632 That's very basic and really misinformative way to describe both systems. It seems like you are just picking random numbers and giving them as arguments to describe one being more capable than the other.

@Ali-rp5lj Жыл бұрын

S-400 is better of course, turkiya just subjected them to rigorous tests and declared it the best and the most successful air defense system in the world.

@wadopotato33 11 ай бұрын

No. Turkey found they were the best for the cost. Big Difference. American systems are simply more expensive.

@napobg6842 11 ай бұрын

@@wadopotato33 But better

@napobg6842 11 ай бұрын

Interesting how they found that without having the Patriot

@prizefighter8699 11 ай бұрын

@@wadopotato33 still this not change anything s40p perform better

@prizefighter8699 11 ай бұрын

@@napobg6842 they have it coz its in nato

@_XPEHOPE3_ Жыл бұрын

To protect any object, you will need 4 sets of Patriot, radar and launch containers of each installation should look to the north, south, west and east. 4.5 billion dollars stand guard over one object. The S-400 has a 360 degree umbrella. Radars rotate and scan everything. The launchers are vertical, which means the rocket will find a shortcut to the target by itself. 700 million dollars reliably protect the facility. The Russian system is better in all possible aspects, both technical and cost. And this means that if Russia puts its system at an equal cost as the US 4.5 billion, then this dome will be impossible to break through.

@neexxxt 10 ай бұрын

Красава!

@user-uo1kq9fl1r 10 ай бұрын

Там пятый комплекс ещё есть. Он должен смотреть в жопу.. Это всё чушь! Получается патриот делади грязные торгаши. А давайте разделим функции и будем продавать не по одной машине а по 4. 100% было так, вот только наладить взаимодействие их что бы они отразили функционал С 300 или С 400, становится в 4 раза сложнее чем дать все функции одной машине. Жульничество в пользу торгаша касается всей американской техники.

@toninhosoldierhelmet4033 10 ай бұрын

i do wonder, how does russia make the S400 so cheap? my only conclusion is they are effectively liying on how much the system actually costs, military hardware ins't magic and the olligarchs are by no means making things more efficient.

@raahcela5829 10 ай бұрын

@@toninhosoldierhelmet4033 I think from my research. 1. Not profit based. 2. Workers more productive. 3. Multiple lines per factory means you can buy in bulk at better price. 4. Lots of components built by other companies owned by Russia noy for profit. 5. Raw material is from Russia. The USA only builds weapons for one reason. MONEY.

@randomriku6774 5 ай бұрын

Lmao "not for profit" half the money probably goes to the pockets of corrupt officials

@Sheikhassan235 Жыл бұрын

Assuming your analysis is correct the Russian S-400 out performs the US Patriot System in both range and target acquisition. This also seems confirmed by China, Saudi Arabia, Turkey and Iran all having acquired the S-400 System and one would assume prior their purchases their military experts would have evaluated all available Air Defense Systems effectiveness. We are also hearing Russia is now finalizing testing of its S-500 System which will have a much more lethal operational capability.

@realdaybreaker8013 Жыл бұрын

Saudi and Iran do not have S400s, India is the process of acquisition

@MagTronaTref Жыл бұрын

Not s-500, but s-550, tested for which already been done. In 1 year time it will be brought to the army for defense. S-500 already been done in 2022.

@gopichalapathi1223 Жыл бұрын

@@realdaybreaker8013 india already has 3 batches of s400 and other 2 must be delayed due to war .. India already made a deal to buy s500

@Sheikhassan235 Жыл бұрын

@@MagTronaTref The point was made and even the S-400 out performs the US Patriot system in both range detection, number of targets tracked and which missile to fire on each. But there's nothing new in this because even during the Second World War Russian weapons technology surpassed those of both the Germans and Western Allies and I doubt seriously, despite Western propaganda telling us how ignorant Russians are, Russia will lose this advantage in the future. I recall how freaked out the Western world was when Sputnik rolled around the earth beeping its signal. You would have thought then that the US in particular would have taken a more conciliatory approach regarding Russia. Nope, their arrogance just would not allow such and here we are today on the verge of wiping humanity from the earth. Silly people!

@MagTronaTref Жыл бұрын

@@Sheikhassan235 I don’t think silly is a right word for killing millions, starting a war almost every year, trying to eliminate as much population as possible in every way - wars, assassinations, viruses etc …, it’s a hypocrite cruel nation where some ppl and politicians deserve to burn in hell asap !

@romankovalev7894 Жыл бұрын

I will add that the Patriot has a dead zone of 50 meters from the ground, Tomahawk and Kalibr cruise missiles fly at 15-20. The Patriot radar has a narrow sector, it is not circular like the C400. The Russians repeatedly offered competition between systems - the United States refused. In Syria, the Israeli F35s fly around the C400 in a wide circle, they have a ban on approaching. Turkey was offered the Patriot and included back in the F35 program if they removed the C400 - the Turks refused. Since the summer of last year, the C500 has been entering the troops. The C500 is the only system to shoot down a target flying at hypersonic speed along a ballistic trajectory (like Trident, Minuteman) in the Arctic, twice. C550 is currently being tested

@wadopotato33 9 ай бұрын

All Air Defenses have problems with targets close to the ground. It is because the Earth is curved silly goose. Russia gets a little extra distance because they put their radars on masts, but it hasn't helped much with cruise missiles like Storm Shadow. People have this idea that Air Defenses can be made perfect. They can't. The Patriot in testing claims 90% kill rates (latest blocks). Russia claims 100%. It is obvious that since Russia has been hit with a shit ton of missiles and Moscow with two S-400 systems is still letting drones through that Russians are simply full of shit and lie at every opportunity. Fact is that Russian equipment is rarely as good as advertised.

@Austin-cx2xe 5 ай бұрын

Source? And your statement that the C500 is the only system currently recorded of destroying hypersonic missiles is unbelievably wrong. ALL BALLISTIC MISSILES ARE HYPERSONIC ON RE ENTRY. Do you know what country was the first and still the only to shoot down a satellite? America. US military just released several tests showing their ground based interceptors destroying a ICBM in space with a Exoatmospheric kill vehicle. Russia doesn’t even possess such technology. You clowns listen to random KZfaq channels and Turkish and Russia media lol

@_Coffee4Closers 5 ай бұрын

"The Russians repeatedly offered competition between systems".... LOL! What Russian propaganda site did you get this little Gem of Bull Crap? No nation is going to have a "competition" of their weapons versus their enemies, allowing the other to see first hand the capabilities of their systems. S300 and S400 have proven to not be all that Russia claims in both Syria and Ukraine, as with most of Russia's weapons. Meanwhile Patriot has been stopping Russia's pretend "Hyper-sonic" missiles with little issue.

@jozefjurisa7157 5 ай бұрын

Takýto systém potrebujú len rusi na tie obrovské severné oblasti ruska. Pre nás je zbytočný a neohrabaný

@_Coffee4Closers 5 ай бұрын

LOL, the US has multiple systems that shoot down Ballistic Missiles travailing Hyper-sonic are you serious? The Patriot has been easily handling Russian Iskander and Kinzhal missiles. On top of that the Agies Combat System and the SM-6 have little issue stopping ballistic missiles.

@tomk3732 Жыл бұрын

S-400 is way, way better - it is far more modular, can deal with more targets. More missile types, more of everything. It can engage from much further. Also S-400 is battle proven against at peer enemy. S-400 holds record for longest kill.

@ulikemyname6744 Жыл бұрын

I actually cannot confirm anything you said. At the end of the day both systems have similar roles but are also different. S-400 is actually not proven against peer enemy but there are many reports for failures like against the Israeli F-35. Also there is no evidence to suggest longer range defenses.

@tomk3732 Жыл бұрын

@@ulikemyname6744 S-400 never engaged F-35. Never. S-400 is proven against peer enemy - heck even S-300 PU is. S-400 downed Su-27 over Kiev (on video) at the beginning of the war from Belarus. Longest ground to air kill.

@williamzk9083 Жыл бұрын

Ukrain is not a peer enemy you fool.

@SH_K 5 ай бұрын

S400 got trashed in Ukraine you must br smoking weed rofl. All it is doing is to just watch russian positions getting pounded by HIMARS and Storm Shadows.

@tomk3732 5 ай бұрын

@@SH_K LOL - what did Ukraine destroy with their few storm shadow hits? Did they hit the port with navy? Nope. Maybe b/c S-400 protects that. Did they hit their love bridge? No. Maybe b/c all missile attacks failed due to S-400. And just how many missiles hit Belgorod after air defenses were beefed up? None. Only artillery. Yet we have movies of Kiev being hit with lots of missiles - hypersonic has like 100% success rate and even regular cruise missiles fly with ease.

@user-qh6dh2br8t Жыл бұрын

I don't want to paint technical specifications and enter into controversy. But what I like about the C400 system is its vertical rocket launch. This gives a serious advantage.

@user-pu1uj6zh5h Жыл бұрын

Meanwhile in the USA: On February 21, 2008, an SM-3 missile from the Aegis missile defense system was fired from the cruiser Lake Erie in the Pacific Ocean at 22:26 Wednesday EST (06:26 Thursday Moscow time), which hit a satellite located at an altitude of 247 kilometers, moving at a speed of 27.3 thousand km / h (7.6 km / s)

@InvalidDriver Жыл бұрын

@@user-pu1uj6zh5h S-550 может даже лучше.

@user-pu1uj6zh5h Жыл бұрын

@@InvalidDriver не может, у американцев есть силы, ресурсы и связи для создания лучшего оружия в мире, просто они парады военные не проводят и не называют своё оружие аналоговнетным.

@daveblueballz6659 Жыл бұрын

@@InvalidDriver s550s arent even deployed yet while sm3 did it in 2008 lol

@Austin-cx2xe 5 ай бұрын

Oh my god. I seriously hope you don’t think that. It has nothing to do with advantage. It doesn’t even affect the system at all. It has to do with cost. It’s called hot vs cold launch. And cold launch like Russians use is much cheaper as it doesn’t require routing of hot gasses and flames along with not having to flameproof their missiles. Please stop listening to propaganda

@jaycombalicer8523 Жыл бұрын

S400 has a range and power Also has economically cost.

@gerumarc 11 ай бұрын

1. A major advantage of the Russian air defense systems is the ability to be integrated into an A2D system. This means that ALL Russian systems can exchange data with each other. On the one hand, this massively increases the effectiveness against practically every threat and, on the other hand, it makes it more difficult for the opponent to fight it successfully. Even if the S-400 system is used completely autonomously, it has its own short-range defense system (Pantzir). This makes successful combat using e.g. HARM practically impossible. The system's enormous detection range (400 km) allows early detection of an aircraft that wants to use a HARM (range approx. 220 km), long before the system is detected by the enemy aircraft. 2. By modern standards, it takes an eternity until a change of location can be completed. In addition, a very large number of staff (119 men) is required. The S-400 is significantly more mobile!

@Grid88 11 ай бұрын

Interesting and knowledgeable insight.

@wadopotato33 10 ай бұрын

You just listed a bunch of stuff that NATO systems also do. There is a reason why they have NATO standards. The Patriot is also designed to work with other layered defenses like THAAD. It is more mobile. That part is true. But if you look into design philoshophy you will know why.

@gerumarc 10 ай бұрын

@@wadopotato33 Systems of ALL ranges and application spectrums are necessary for a multi-layered air defense. You bring a second American system with THAAD as an example. BOTH are long range systems! I do not know which short or medium-range system can be integrated into a combination of Patriot and THAAD. For example, the Russians use the Pantzir short-range system as close-range defense for their S-400 and S-500. This makes combating these systems with anti-radar weapons more difficult. AND the Pantzir systems can access all radar data from the S-400 or S-500 systems. In addition, the Russians can also integrate long-range radar systems such as NEBO-M. I'll quote from the Wikipedia entry on the Nebo-M radar (en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nebo-M ) "Nebo-M can exchange observed information with antiaircraft missile systems like Pantsir missile system, S-300 and S-400 or others in order to guide them towards threats." The medium-range systems TOR, BUK and S-350 can also be integrated here. The mere fact that in addition to the integrated radars used by the missile systems anyway, others such as Nebo-M can be used and ALL other Russian systems can access this data is a unique selling point of the Russian systems!

@Mkby88 9 ай бұрын

Cant even stop primative Ukraninan drones lol

@gerumarc 9 ай бұрын

@@Mkby88 What's that supposed to mean? These systems are not built for that! The Patriot system can't do that either! The Russians have other systems for this and they use them to shoot down over 80 percent of all Ukrainian drones! As a reminder, an IRIS-T system supplied by Germany and massively hyped in the West was destroyed by a Russian drone!

@akhnukhnoorashrafee4991 Жыл бұрын

S-400 already out performs the Patriot. Imagine what S-500 could do.

@leedex Жыл бұрын

How many times did you have to blow Putin for that propaganda. If the system was capable. Why upload all the fake videos of the system 😂

@ronneltornato5485 Жыл бұрын

try in actual war not in paper send in ukraine agm 88 anti radiation missile is waiting

@daveblueballz6659 Жыл бұрын

I imagine s500 is made for a completely different purpose then what s400 is and not meant as a replacement... dont get how putin nut huggers don't even understand their own machines

@lbwar15 Жыл бұрын

Laughing in himars

@user-ny5bu4lh1e Жыл бұрын

Russia lied about the capabilities of all there weapons except the s400.😂😂😂😂

@recgar Жыл бұрын

I think Turkiye said it best. They gave up hundreds of millions of dollars spent on the F35 to purchase the S400. The US even offered the Patriot and would allow Turkiye to remain in the F35 program and Turkiye still said NO by purchasing the S400 anyway.

@Kardas1 4 ай бұрын

Actually before that the Us didn’t want to sell the patriot system to Turkiye the only time they wanted to sell it was when Turkiye was in the process of already buying the s-400 systems . As a country if I wanted to buy something and they denied me multiple times I would go for the better and cheaper system .

@gadgetvidgetov2918 4 ай бұрын

I think Turkiye will re-sell s400 to US with multiple price soon.

@recgar 4 ай бұрын

@@Kardas1 Ankara walks the edge of the sword between NATO and Russia using their relationship with both to the best of their advantage which is great for Turkiye.

@Kardas1 4 ай бұрын

@@recgar of course Turkiye always does what’s best for them selves.

@mattlife25 Күн бұрын

Turkey called the S-400 a scam and said it didn't perform even close to what Russian is touting.

@Moskou1 Жыл бұрын

I love that you are making videos again. Keep going, I will keep watching.

@Grid88 Жыл бұрын

More to come!

@Moskou1 Жыл бұрын

@@Grid88 Would you mind to make a Patriot VS Su 57?

@alexmikh828 Жыл бұрын

русское оружье хорошо только на бумаге. Русская армия как и русское оружье - это ФЕЙК.

@Grid88 11 ай бұрын

Good idea.

@wakcikboo3091 Жыл бұрын

S 300,S 400,S 500.👍👍👍👍👍

@leedex Жыл бұрын

LMAO. That’s why Russia is suing the system for ground attacks in Ukraine 😂

@daveblueballz6659 Жыл бұрын

where was it when moskva got turned into a submarine

@hohhan1978 4 ай бұрын

@@leedex That was the only way for ukrainian propaganda to disprove its own S-300 inefficiency. They hit its own houses buy S-300 more often than targets🤣 So in order to get rid of own guilt thay just blame russians for ''attacking'' them with AA systems🤡 Also just for reality check, only ukrainians actually OFFICIALLY claimed to use AA missiles for hitting ground targets in Crimea with soviet S-200 rockets. No real evidence for the same from russian side.🤡🤡🤡

@rukuku 5 ай бұрын

S400 is better: it's vertical and cold launch allows the rockets to fly and hit targets coming from any direction. Patriots are hot launched which means they can only be launched at an angle so the exhaust can escape, and that limits them to a narrow sector. S400 would be my choice every day any day

@leedex 4 ай бұрын

A-400 is absolutely trash! There aren’t any proof, that the system can hit an incoming missiles. If Russian tech were working. They would have taken Kiev in 2022 😂 Trusting Russian tech, is like trusting Chinese tech!

@briant5685 Жыл бұрын

SO far s-400 is the only air defence system to have intercepted a target from a distance of over 150km,in the opening days of the conflict an s-400 located in Belarus intercepted the su-27 of the Ukrainian air force in the centre of Kiev which was being piloted by their famous colonel and hero of Ukraine

@daveblueballz6659 Жыл бұрын

meanwhile they couldnt even defend their mainland from hinds while patriots eat khinzals for breakfast

@bonifacenjuguna7453 Жыл бұрын

@@daveblueballz6659false claims without a proof..the evidence provided or shown by kyiv governor about missile fragments from a missile intercepted don't even match kinzhal that was betab 500

@yurich6479 Жыл бұрын

@@daveblueballz6659 patriots sucks for breakfast

@daveblueballz6659 Жыл бұрын

@@yurich6479 swats khinzals left and right

@keonliller_2287 11 ай бұрын

@@daveblueballz6659are you talking about the patriot which fired about 30 missiles and still got destroyed?

@hamzayakubov1989 Жыл бұрын

S-400 cool 💪🏼🔥🔥🔥

@user-dn9om7yw1r Жыл бұрын

гоано с 400)

@f-35lightningii6 Жыл бұрын

was ukraine M142 himar missile hit twice S-400 destroy successfully... S-400 very expensive $300 million dollars can't shoot down by Ukraine M142 himars cost $6 million dollars... S-400 Can't protect Russia military equipment destroy from ukraine...

@tgsgardenmaintenance4627 Жыл бұрын

Slightly different ways of dealing with similar situations. No system is infallible! Will have to wait and see what the S-500 & S550 bring to the table! Russia does appear to have the most layered air defence systems in the world at the moment. Everything from manpads to S-500's,and everything in between!

@ulikemyname6744 Жыл бұрын

That's arguable. America has the AEGIS, Thaad, Patriot, its air force, satellites, laser weapons and so much more. If anything due to its geographic location as well as its influence over Europe and the World Oceans it is safe to say that the US has the most depth

@DIREWOLFx75 Жыл бұрын

"No system is infallible!" No, but if you want to compare directly, you also need to realise that USA doesn't have barely a tiny fraction of the numbers of SAM missiles that Russia does. In Ukraine, Russian airdefences have fired, at minimum, over twice as many SAMs as USA has ever built. And that's the lowest possible estimation. The highest possible leans closer to 10 times as many. "Will have to wait and see what the S-500 & S550 bring to the table!" Yeah no... You need to realise, that even the S-300 model from the 80s is easily superior to the most modern model of the Patriot system. USSR learned from WWII that it could never assume that it would fight with air superiority, so it spent a CRAPLOAD of resources on making sure that it wouldn't matter. That even if its own airforce was completely destroyed, anything daring to fly over its groundforces would be shot to pieces. This was later reinforced by Natos and USAs excessive focus on airpower, as it basically made the Soviet airdefences potentially REALLY overpowered. Which was also blatantly shown in the 1973 war, when a limited amount of export model Soviet SAMs, fielded by personnel and support of questionable quality, still came close to utterly shredding the Israeli airforce. The USN SAMs are better, but still not comparable.

@jenlyramli5321 Жыл бұрын

@@ulikemyname6744 what for to argue bro? Send those to Ukraine bro. Fighting is ongoing bro

@lbwar15 Жыл бұрын

⁠@@jenlyramli5321 export patriots are in Ukrainian and have been extremely successful. I’m just trying to find out if the s-400 is so good why is himars such a big problem fir them?

@gambu4810 Жыл бұрын

@@lbwar15 Himars are not a big problem. When last did you hear of a successful Himars attack? By the way Russia is fighting Ukraine with S300 defense system. The S400 only defends Russia in Russia it hasn't been sent to Ukraine.

@jasonplazar-yd9ch Жыл бұрын

Keep up the Great work! no bias!

@mr.djsubash6091 Жыл бұрын

You have answered every questions...! Thank you

@user-pu1uj6zh5h Жыл бұрын

@backapalanka8406 Жыл бұрын

S.300 PMU 4000 Antey i S.400 Win a S.500 S.550 su druga priča to je prejako. 🇷🇺💪💪💪

@VladimirStevanoviclennon33 Жыл бұрын

💤💤💤

@backapalanka8406 Жыл бұрын

@@VladimirStevanoviclennon33 🏃‍♂️🏃‍♂️🏃‍♂️🏃‍♂️🏃‍♂️🏃‍♂️🏃‍♂️🌀💤💤💤💤💤💤💤💤🇷🇺🇷🇺🇷🇺🇷🇺💪💪💪

@anonimusistine7378 Жыл бұрын

A gde je tu naš FK3?

@walterwhite5307 Жыл бұрын

@user-pu1uj6zh5h Жыл бұрын

USA test LASER ANTI-AIR weapon, russia will never get weapon like this.

@TheoGottwald Жыл бұрын

S400 Radar can track Stealth Aircrafts like the F-22 or F-35. For that task there are multiple Radars needed.

@shooter7a Жыл бұрын

S400 has differing radars for acquisition, and targeting. The Aq radar (lower frequency) can "see" the stealth aircraft...but the targeting radar (higher frequency...providing weapons grade lock), required for guidance can not till much much closer range. So the S400 will know the F22 or F35 is there...but that is not the same as targeting it. Russia's own performance claims are that the low-frequency arrays leveraged by the Nebo-M can detect the F-117 Nighthawk at a range of 350 kilometers (217 miles) in an environment free from electronic warfare (EW), and potentially as far as 72 kilometers (45 miles) under heavy jamming. This detection range is the basis for many S-400 counter-stealth claims, but it fails to acknowledge the difference between detecting a stealth fighter and targeting one, let alone the dramatically smaller RCSs of the F-35 and F-22 The figures above represent the detection range for the S-400 system’s low-frequency radars versus the F-117, which offers an RCS that’s approximately 30 times larger than the F-22 and at least twice the size of the F-35. As a result, both detection and targeting ranges for these more modern fighters will be reduced dramatically. Based on assessments, the S-400 can target aircraft like the F-35, but likely not until the jet flies within 20 miles of the system. As a result, in a one-on-one fight between America’s F-35A and Russia’s S-400, the stealth fighter would almost certainly take home the win in a future conflict thanks to the forthcoming adoption of weapons like Northrop Grumman’s Advanced Anti-Radiation Guided Missile Extended Range (ARRGM-ER)

@wadopotato33 11 ай бұрын

@@shooter7a Exactly. People get excited about stealth aircraft being able to be picked up. They always have been able to be seen. It isn't magic. However, it does give them a huge advantage over regular aircraft as the distance they can be seen at is shortened greatly and the ability for a good targetting lock is harder. It has never been about being invisible, but rather breaking a necessary step in a kill chain. People love to point out that stealth isn't perfect, to which I would say, "if stealth can be seen and targetted, what do you think happens to a fourth-generation plane?...they can be seen and targetted at much, much greater distances. If stealth didn't work, then countries would not be spending billions of dollars chasing it.

@user-mr5zy6gf8h 5 ай бұрын

@@wadopotato33ну почему в истории известны случаи трат в пустую третье поколение истребителей или А-12 и все машины проекта архангел вбухали миллиарды ради скорости полёта а по итогу ни хрена😂😂😂 Так что и малозаметность не панацея

@user-ge1cu5uv4w Ай бұрын

Russia can just use those low freqency radars to detect and positioning stealth aircrafts and then use anti radiation misciles to destruy them.They do not need to use ground launchers,but airborn anti radiation misciles from aircrafts or other ground based anti aircraft systems.You forget that Russia has all its anti aircraft misciles and radars integrated in one system from those schoulder launchers to anti sattelite misciles.They have layerd air defence that has no analogs anywhere on the face of the earth.

@ewugavictor6347 Жыл бұрын

S-400 remain the best defend system ❤

@dat2kn 6 ай бұрын

Patriot is only suitable for making Hollywood movies. both expensive and ineffective.

@abdihassan9239 Ай бұрын

👌👌👌👍👍👍👍👍

@curtisuwuigbe6343 Жыл бұрын

S-400 is far superior to the Patriot. Compare S300-M with the Patriot, not with S-400. Russia is ahead, and has always been ahead of the USA in missile tech. The US is ahead in jets, naval forces.

@dark_master_Makei Жыл бұрын

The USA does not lead in the superiority of jet fighters. Of all, only the F-22 can be praised, but it has not been produced for a long time and is becoming obsolete.

@aleksandarvidakovic7632 Жыл бұрын

US is not ahead in anything. f35 is failed project, heard a US colonel of air force saying f-35 flies like a brick, airmen prefer f-16.

@renaissance1559 Жыл бұрын

Russian su57 fighter outperforms any US fighter

@aleksandarvidakovic7632 Жыл бұрын

@@renaissance1559 so do Mig 31 and SU 30, 33, 34, and 35. Mig 29 is also considered better than f16.

@Sakura_Matou Жыл бұрын

Jets is Debateable, the SU-34 out classes most tactical strike aircraft the US has with the Exception of the strike Eagle and only the F-15 can really match the SU-30. The Su-35 and SU 57 only are matched by the F-22.

@atanasvasilev3228 Жыл бұрын

The s-400 is better in all aspects except it doesn't work with AEGIS which if Im not mistaken is accessible only to the USA. Overall the s-400 smashes the Patriot.

@adelbertantonio2937 Жыл бұрын

It’s all hype!!!!

@tomk3732 Жыл бұрын

S-400 provides ballistic missile defense. For even better defense you have S-500.

@ulikemyname6744 Жыл бұрын

Mmm not reeally. TThe Patriot has very very long histroy of modernization and improvements. It was tested in battlefields and the US knows exactly where it is good and bad.

@adelbertantonio2937 Жыл бұрын

@@tomk3732 The parts and microchips came from the West?? Now that they are under sanctions I wonder where they get their supply? That’s why their soldiers resorted to steal the microchips from Ukraine household washing machine? Which is very very funny and very pathetic!!🤣

@tomk3732 Жыл бұрын

@@adelbertantonio2937 You know what is really pathetic? It's people like you that believe in such BS.

@TheRandyWanker 11 ай бұрын

If any1 remembers that last year an Israels F-35 was damaged by a "bird strike", they claimed. A "bird" was an old Soviet-era S-200 missile. So S-300 and S-400 are so much better.

@leedex 4 ай бұрын

@johnd6895 Жыл бұрын

The S400 is superior in every way. With a defense budget as massive as ours, I would think we would have the better system but that’s simply not the case. We need to upgrade our middle defense systems drastically and now to meet the new threats of today. We also need to figure out a way to make US military equipment and weapons more affordable. It seems our defense contractors, as important as they are for keeping our country safe, are taking advantage of our rich defense budget simply because they can. They have been getting away with overcharging our government for years and something needs to be done. Russia and China already have systems far superior to ours and they will continue to our pace us until something changes.

@charlesrichardson8635 7 ай бұрын

Sure Russian Troll. Tune into YTer Habitual Linecrosser and learn the truth. NASAMS work just fine.

@thegorr6184 5 ай бұрын

I think the US knows a lot better than you bud. There’s a lot of things we have that you don’t know about. That’s what 800 billion defense budget gets you

@leedex 5 ай бұрын

If S-400 was a good system. Russia wouldn’t have done better defending their supply depots. Facts is that S-400 sucks in battle and only propaganda!

@dougphalen 5 ай бұрын

What it gets you? A lot of billionaires and corrupt politicians......@@thegorr6184

@bouloshijazin5129 Жыл бұрын

S 400 , is better for sure and seems to be cheaper

@backapalanka8406 Жыл бұрын

Uuu odličan je sad je srušio avion i rakete na 220km opasan je S.400 a da negovorim S.500 S.550 a sad će i S.600.

@basook6116 Жыл бұрын

its also faster, has longer ranger, and more accurate

@johnsilver9338 Жыл бұрын

David's Sling is the best as its stunner missile can reach 300km with a hypersonic speed of Mach 7.5 while also having dual active radar/infrared IF homing. No interceptor either from Patriot or from S-400 has the same capability in one package. It's also the cheapest as it only cost around 700k to 1M USD. Hence why it is adopted for the Patriot system under Raytheon's PAAC-4 SkyCeptor.

@ElToronski Жыл бұрын

@@johnsilver9338 IIRC, its HTK too, right? HTK is way better at ABM roles.

@adelbertantonio2937 Жыл бұрын

S- 400 is just a hype !!

@Viper6-MotoVlogger Жыл бұрын

Good video bro. The Russians have a way of producing military hardware at a cheaper price.

@Grid88 Жыл бұрын

Thank you my one of the greatest subscribers. Pls share the video.

@Viper6-MotoVlogger Жыл бұрын

@@Grid88 👍

@Viper6-MotoVlogger Жыл бұрын

@@Freedmen-American-Reparations I don’t think it’s only that. I think that in the US, defence development companies over price their products.

@michaelmagyar5785 Жыл бұрын

Because its crap 😂

@kalgstol Жыл бұрын

@@michaelmagyar5785 yeah, it only out performs the patriot in every metric😂

@irenaskrzynska1938 5 ай бұрын

Patriot is capable of shooting down Kh-47M2 Kinzhal missiles, but the S-400 is unable to down the Storm Shadow.

@user-yj1on3bf1v 5 ай бұрын

Britain sent more than 200 Shtorm Shadow missiles to Ukraine. Most of these missiles were destroyed by Russian air defenses. Storm Shadow is not a target for the S400, for this there is short-range air defense with cheap missiles that cover the S400. This is called layered air defense. This is something the US doesn't have. That's why the US spends Patriot missiles costing $3 million each. Patriot is unable to shoot down the Kinzhal. Not a single missile was hit. Targets in Kyiv are successfully hit every time. In the last days when the Russians struck Kyiv. The US spent a lot of missiles and could not do anything. The Russians hit weapons depots and destroyed several US and NATO air defense systems. This confimend by media in Poland. Ukraine spends too many air defense missiles and the United States is not capable of producing that many. The same thing has already happened with 155 mm shells, high-precision missiles, including Himars. So the US Arsenals are empty now. The world war has not yet begun, and the US and NATO arsenals are ALREADY devastated. Congratulations.

@RevenantBelief 5 ай бұрын

many confirmed hits on kinzhals by patriots, just google it@@user-yj1on3bf1v

@florinardelean4760 4 ай бұрын

Patriot se dobara el pe el, patriot nici nu viseaza sa doboare kinzhal, rusii au doborat cacaturile alea de rachete englezesti... Daca esti proasta, stai acasa..... Kinzhal nu poate fi doborat de nici o racheta americana...QED!

@onepartofone Ай бұрын

😂😂😂😂. Lol. No kinzhal was shot down yet, mate. Where do you get your info from? Zelenski? 😂😂😂😂

@rated-gr3983 Ай бұрын

You are totally wrong, kinzhal is a hypersonic missiles very fast it has a speed of mach 10 and can reach up to 460-480 km. that none of the present u.s. weapons can intercept it. You better do your own research and do not believe what ukrainian clowns and uncle sam said. Now China, North Korea and Iran develop their own hypersonic missiles using Russian blue print of its own hypersonic flat form.

@cheekeongchan9750 5 ай бұрын

Which is cheaper n yet effective?

@mahamajones2994 Жыл бұрын

I think they are both good depending on your needs👍nice video

@Grid88 Жыл бұрын

Thanks 👍

@adibmouhanna6823 Жыл бұрын

Keep on going!👏👌👍💯

@Grid88 Жыл бұрын

Thanks ✌ bro you are one of our great subscribers. Pls share the video.

@adibmouhanna6823 Жыл бұрын

@@Grid88 Welcome.Sure!

@sfisomate2300 Жыл бұрын

Most definitely S-400😊

@francisMuriuki-rr5bw Ай бұрын

Remember when Zerensky said,that no russian missile is able to bypass patriot 😊very true 😊😊

@trincs4966 Жыл бұрын

great video

@Grid88 Жыл бұрын

Glad you enjoyed it

@Ramil8548 Жыл бұрын

@@Grid88 what is the result in the end

@bagdadkamikaz Жыл бұрын

S-400

@Megaliberator-mt4dc 6 ай бұрын

Comparing Patriot with S-400 is an insult. How can you compare catapult with AK-47?

@vikaslal3034 Жыл бұрын

🇷🇺 S-400 ❤️‍🔥

@isuruthiwanka2595 Жыл бұрын

No any discussions... S400 is the best in the world.. 👍👍👍

@mouradbelkas598 Жыл бұрын

From you video and analysis, it seems S400 is better.

@championknife Жыл бұрын

there is another important thing, the S-400 vertical launch system, and its radars rotate, that is, the S-40 can shoot in any direction. while the Patriot is directed by both missiles and radars in the same direction, and is vulnerable from the rear. And the S-400 is not the latest modification, Russia produces the S-500, the characteristics of which are much higher.

@car9167 Жыл бұрын

so what? They have satellites to warn about incoming missile from a distance and can re-orient the radar. I don't see that an issue

@championknife Жыл бұрын

@@car9167 This is too fleeting a process, especially since the attack can be massive, from several sides, no satellites will help in this case.

@blenozaro8980 Жыл бұрын

For now, the Russians possess theist Effective air defence capabilities. Why won't they? While the US Concentrated on projecting military might as its concept of deterrence, ie F22,F35 and their patients, Aircraft carriers, establishment of foreign bases etc. Russia concentrated on Defensive capabilities ,even their best fighters are 1st great interceptors , air defence integration with advanced Jamming devices and all that

@ulikemyname6744 Жыл бұрын

The US is also well invested into its defenses. After all the USN destroyers are almost entirely built around the defense of the carriers which are the offense power. AEGIS is a defensive system. It is only logical that the US made something similar for their ground-based operations.

@ValentainSun 10 ай бұрын

@@ulikemyname6744 Russia has always created all the equipment for "defense". The United States has an for attack. Russia has been defending itself all its history and its engineers are the best in this matter. While the US military is overcharging its government for development and production (I think people in the White House and the military are actually laundering money). Then in Russia and China it is 5 times cheaper, both development and production.

@yasaswiniartandcraft4657 Жыл бұрын

Russia's S400 is the Best Air Defense System in the World 🌎 👍

@Gumiho-34 9 ай бұрын

Agree.. it’s proven… they all mucking s400 before .. but now after seeing its performance in ukraine compare to patriot.. RUSSIA AIR DEFENSE ARE THE BEST, no.1

@MrCampingCarl 5 ай бұрын

yes, it is so good at friendly fire...

@johnmiller6197 3 сағат бұрын

In reality...The S400 's blow up just when you need them...😂

@nenad2427 Жыл бұрын

S-500 most superior😁

@raterNAZ Жыл бұрын

have any of these systems been tested in actual combat?

@jupiter5109 Жыл бұрын

Patriot AD, never been used and it didn't even secured Saudi's treasure. It was hit by a low class rockets/missiles even if Patriot Air defense system was on guard active and prepared. Only good in propaganda marketing.

@jupiter5109 Жыл бұрын

S400 is proven effective. Anyway, S400 is an overkill. Having S300 is enough to secure a territory. S400 is for massive and more deadliest targets.

@leedex Жыл бұрын

@@jupiter5109 how many times did you have to blow Putin for that propaganda 😂 Where are the video proofs, that the system is working?

@daveblueballz6659 Жыл бұрын

s400s have been used to shoot down old migs and su jets while patriots eat hypejob khinzals for breakfast, and little jupiter talks about s300s being enough when they couldnt even protect the great moskva from becoming a submarine

@michaelorden1 Жыл бұрын

The patriot has been in combat. And it's a complete failure. We all saw what happened in suadi Arabia by Yemen. Two patriot system failed. Both were confused as fuuuuk .one system started talking to the other like bro.....what do we 😂😂😂. They just sat back and watched the drama unfold...

@ismaelbarron7600 Жыл бұрын

Now imagine a country with both airdefense system plus Iron Dome

@jupiter5109 Жыл бұрын

Iron dome is a joke against superior countries with either s300, s400 or even with patriot missiles. Iron dome is only good against small and less deadly rockets like what the Palestinians are using. Our country didn't even bother to show interest of acquiring it.

@hafizshah1069 Жыл бұрын

Still could't sleep easy jews!

@Henrique-qt4fq Жыл бұрын

@@hafizshah1069 wtf

@jenlyramli5321 Жыл бұрын

@@hafizshah1069 i like that...

@smcsmc1813 Жыл бұрын

А купол работает по низколетящим целям? Ну как бы он хорошо работает по старым ракетам которые летят по вполне предсказуемой траектории, а пробовали куполу задание по серьёзней дать?

@DelayNoMore4444 Ай бұрын

Putin : S 400 Biden : my ice cream is chocolate

@lemonacidrounds7293 4 ай бұрын

2:07 BAZ and MAZ Soviet trucks are looking awesome

@donatorubia7477 Жыл бұрын

the s 400 is the best than patriot

@sevaasatryan3332 Жыл бұрын

teaches given the fact that Ukrainian drones flew through all the S400 complexes and hit the air base in Engels

@HH-co9yo Жыл бұрын

@@sevaasatryan3332 It depends from the operators , alerts , and other radars for drones . S-400 isn't made to shot drones , or is not preferred .

@f-35lightningii6 Жыл бұрын

@@HH-co9yo was ukraine M142 himar missile hit twice S-400 destroy successfully... S-400 very expensive $300 million dollars can't shoot down by Ukraine M142 himars cost $6 million dollars... S-400 Can't protect Russia military equipment destroy from ukraine...

@kitkat8536 Жыл бұрын

Сирии они не помогли😂

@user-we5kz3qs7l Жыл бұрын

@@HH-co9yo , oh yeap, and airport in crimea is also not for s400. But if we are speaking about shouting of drones,of course if you use rocket for 1 million dollars for the drone, that costs 30000 you’re idiot, but the drones that crushed tu95 it ist tu141, it is really huge and fast, it is like cruise missile, so it is incorrectly to say, that tu95 was destroyed by drone, correctly will that it was destroyed by cruise missile . And now we know that s400 didn’t destroyed 2 times tu141 and also 3-4 this drones destroyed something in Moskowska oblast. Conclusion-s400 is paper tiger , on the paper(or Wikipedia) it is the best, but in reality… Only three words for s400(ANALogovnet)

@shanekhiu9884 Жыл бұрын

S-400 is better. Turkey gave up the F-35 to buy S-400s

@adelbertantonio2937 Жыл бұрын

S-400 can’t even shoot down Israel F-16 how much more with F-35??? Turkey decided to buy its defense from russia bcoz of the US refusal to sell them F-35? Get your facts straight!

@CC-ns2ds Жыл бұрын

I’d guess it was more due to budget then to picking the S-400 because it’s better. It’s probably been cheaper for them to develop there own stealth fighter (TF-X)

@daddycool387 Жыл бұрын

Definitely S-400 are cheaper where components are bought from Alibaba. 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

@unknowni41 Жыл бұрын

@@daddycool387 hahaha so funny🤓🤓🤓🤓

@virginccyy7645 Жыл бұрын

Well they wanted the Patriot System with tech transfer and US said no, so they bought this POS and plan on retirement when their home based system comes to exist! $3 billion dud

@engr.ediyoakpanesen7260 4 ай бұрын

You just have to doubt Russian claims about the S-400 but believe everything about the patriot. That is the most important and final command.

@SharkiMike 11 ай бұрын

price, versatility, area, ability to detect etc etc

@unclefester831 Жыл бұрын

The S-300s have been very effective for the Ukrainians so far so I would assume that S-400 is very effective too.

@Valentin82. Жыл бұрын

Да, С-300 украинское, которое досталось им ещё от соза и не модернизировалось должным образом, может попадать только по своим домам, как это было в Киеве. Или по польским тракторам, когда украинская ракета от С-300 попала в польский трактор, убив человека.

@ulikemyname6744 Жыл бұрын

But in the same time S-300 failed to defend the cruiser Moskva from 2 subsonic anti-ship cruise missiles.

@car9167 Жыл бұрын

indeed very effective as ballistic missiles most of the time since they ran out of other rockets

@daveblueballz6659 Жыл бұрын

s300s couldnt even protect moskva from becoming a submarine

@pinecone1208 8 ай бұрын

oh ffs all these people talking abt the moskva clearly dont realise that the s-300 is made to protect from ballistic missiles and aircraft. the other systems are meant to defend from slower flying cruise missiles. The sinking of the moskva had nothing to do with the ineffectiveness of the s-300

@africainafricaintupac Жыл бұрын

S 400 💪

@sergeykoren6431 3 ай бұрын

So, in 2023, S400 overslept an attack on the headquarters of the Black Sea Fleet in Sevastopol. On the other hand, the Patriots hit Kynzhals. I am vote for Pattiot PAC3

@David-wp2iw 5 ай бұрын

Since s400 was created, it had opportunities to show its capabilities, but never shown anything. It only show a cluster of s400 fan boys military experts

@patrickfuller6025 18 күн бұрын

S-400 was just destroyed by himars the very weapon it was designed to defeat. Guess it does not pass the test.

@jamesjenkins3384 Күн бұрын

It was not designed for HIMARS. It will be modified for this task.

@cokrlicix Жыл бұрын

Serbia in 1999 NATO aggression shot down US stealth aircraft F-117A using a modified Soviet S-125 so-called "Neva" system from the 60s. There is nothing that the US can manufacture that S400 or S500 can't shoot down.

@vincentjayradaza1029 Жыл бұрын

YOU KNOW NITHING ABOUT D SUTUATION,, D F117 ATTACKS MANY TIMES AND SUCEDED , ALWAYS PASSES D FREQUENCY OF D RADAR ,ALWAYS COMPIANCE, THAT TARGET IS A FLUKE

@FileFixer007 5 ай бұрын

Every S-400 battery has self protected with Pantsir short range system, previous with Kashtan.

@kempmt1 Ай бұрын

I like how the S400 missile launches from the launch tube

@emmanuelmvula1158 Жыл бұрын

S 400 sounds better system and low cost. However all the systems will require on the how the crew use it, if they are slow to act the system will be targeted and distroyed

@backapalanka8406 Жыл бұрын

S.400 je automatizovan a zavisi od vojnika kako su spremni. Mi smo 1999 sa Neva 125 srušili F.117 Kub Bofors praga igla Strela šilo mnogo smo raznih Nato aviona srušili apače i razne Helikoptere. A, imali smo sve staro i radare ali smo dobro radili. Možeš imati najbolje sisteme i naoružanje ako nisi spreman uvežbani neznaš nema sloge morala nema ni vojske. A mi smo tad sa skroz starim uradili dobar posao na novu Nato i SAD tehnologiju sami protiv svih. Naši avioni Mig.29 su leteli bez radara bez ičega i borili se a Nato i SAD sa 50 avio a Awaks sve a mi sa 3 aviona na njih 50vs3

@williamzk9083 Жыл бұрын

Don't be fooled by the Pro-Z fan boys and other lickers of Pootin. Russia is desperate to sell its systems and exaggerates performance. The Pro-Z fan boys endlessly lie about Patriot ignoring the newer versions. Patriots missiles have been upgraded and the radars in particular in the last 4 years.

@gambu4810 Жыл бұрын

It is absolutely impressive that Russia has equipment that out competes American military equipment considering that Russian economy is 15 times lower than the American economy. They don't just outdo America in defensive equipment but on offensive weapons too, they just have fewer stockpiles but higher quality.

@AaBbCcDd-lb8xj Жыл бұрын

USA spends 800billion dollars/year for military Russia spends 75billion /year I agree, it's impressive fr

@wadopotato33 11 ай бұрын

Lower qualiity by a mile. In almost no measure is Russia on par with the US in military tech. In most measures they are a decade behind. American weapons have both higher success rates and accuracy than Russian weapons. Your idea is silly and the opposite of where the truth lies. That shows a level of ignorance. But hey, you can fix that.

@GlobalResearch2001 11 ай бұрын

You don't know how Russian MIC operates !! They have a huge advantage over us because all MIC are state owned and they can produce at any given time for the cost. Our MIC is corrupted to the bone as it seeks to make BILLIONS for their investors, and they need months and years in order to start production of any given weapon !! Every single American politician has shares in the MIC that's why we constantly go to wars !! We finally got too greedy by taking Russia on in Ukraine...this is gonna hurt !!!

@TearsOnAWind 11 ай бұрын

@@user-wj3eu7so4d и в чем разница, думаешь после СССР всех людей убили, а рептилойды РСФСР заселили людьми заново ? К чему эта твоя поправка что она блядь меняет?

@MrXargmag 11 ай бұрын

@@wadopotato33isn't this video an example of how the Russians get a lot more bang for their buck than we do? It's pretty obvious that of the 800b/year we spend maybe 75% of that is lost to corruption/over pricing etc. So you can't just compare dollars spent and that's the value of a military. Look at how the Russians are outpacing the us in terms of tanks, artillery ammo, man power, armoured vehicles and missile defense systems... Look at the current conflict in Ukraine

@MathyBoonen 20 сағат бұрын

Salesnumbers tell you everything.

@rathanapparathanappa5077 10 ай бұрын

I think both are good at their designs, range, specifications, domains & their particular area of operations of work respectively & distinctively.

@mohok2751 Жыл бұрын

You can't even compare the Patriot with the S300, let alone the S400!

@wadopotato33 11 ай бұрын

You can't because they fill different roles for different militaries. That also does not make the S-400 better. The Patriot is a small part of the US's "layered defense". The S-400 tries to do more with a single system. In other words, it tries to fill part of the role that THAAD would fill for the US. They are not really directly comparable.

@renetanchico6901 11 ай бұрын

I agree! You can't... Because the Patriot works, and it's a proven killer of Russia's Iskander ballistic missile, and Russia's Kinzhal hypersonic missile in Ukraine. What does Russia's S-400, S-300 had accomplished so far in Ukraine? They can't even shoot down America's HIMARS, but the Russian media are bragging about their military were able to shoot down 1 UK storm shadow. A lot of military expert believed it was not shot down. They believed it malfunction, majority of the missiles body including the warhead are still intact.

@RobertGlazier Жыл бұрын

The U.S. never reveals the true capability of their weapons. U.S. Army retired.

@kjererrt7804 Жыл бұрын

the patriot has revealed it is utter crap.

@kenfelix8703 5 ай бұрын

Logistics and supply. One can be rapidly replaced and missiles fly out the factory line. The other cannot be replaced when destroyed and missiles come of the line at a few a week.

@okomorterry421 5 ай бұрын

S400 that cannot take out HIMARS, it's funny.

@slgroup4575 Жыл бұрын

Comparing these two systems is the same as comparing Chrysler and Moskvich :)

@funkbass1986 Жыл бұрын

Согласен с вами. Патриот по наземным целям умеет? С-400 умеет. Им по Himars лупят. Стреляют по ракете Himars, через радар ракеты С-400 обнаруживают установку Himars и перенаправляют ракету на установку.

@user-xd7hk7oe1f 11 ай бұрын

В этой ситуации москвич оказался мощней Крайслера)

@DennisMerwood-xk8wp Жыл бұрын

During the 1991 Gulf War, the public was led to believe the that the Patriot had near-perfect performance, intercepting 45 of 47 Scud missiles. The U.S. Army later revised that estimate down to about 50 percent - and even then, it expressed “higher” confidence in only about one-quarter of the cases. A pesky Congressional Research Service employee noted that if the Army had correctly applied its own assessment methodology consistently, the number would be far lower. Reportedly that number was one - as in one lousy Scud missile downed. According to a House Committee on Government Operations investigation, there was not enough evidence to conclude that there had been any intercepts. “There is little evidence to prove that the Patriot hit more than a few Scud missiles launched by Iraq during the Gulf War,” a summary of the investigations concluded dryly, “and there are some doubts about even these engagements.” This report - which called on the Pentagon to declassify more information about the performance of the Patriot and request an independent evaluation of the program - never saw the light of day. A fierce lobbying campaign by the Army and Raytheon spiked it, save for a summary.

@sergejlavrov3446 Жыл бұрын

Correct. The US also killed more of its own in Vietnam than the enemy did.

@ulikemyname6744 Жыл бұрын

We won't really know for sure how many missiles were actually shot down. Yet even that is not really an argument as its been very long time since the Gulf War. Over 30 years! So many modifications and improvements have been made and thus the results are only for historical comparisons rather than an overview of how it would perform today. That's a big mistake I see many people do. To compare platforms with their current versions. Like in my country there are debates for and against the F-16 and many people against the purchease of the F-16 are point how old this system is. That ofc is extremely misleading because the only things that the first version of F-16 from the 70s and F-16 Block 70/72 have in common are the name and the looks.

@Henrique-qt4fq Жыл бұрын

Yeah, on the early days of the S series its pretty safe to assume they also had some targetting problems on em, just how R&D works, you start with something crap and work on it until its good

@DennisMerwood-xk8wp Жыл бұрын

@@Henrique-qt4fq Or you give up on it - and stop wasting taxpayer money! Like we gave up on the XB-70 bomber.

@Henrique-qt4fq Жыл бұрын

@@DennisMerwood-xk8wp not talking about sepaku or anything, its just that humanity hasnt invented a system without deep fried flaws, capitalism can devolve into anarcho capitalism, socialism can devolve into totalitarism, etc...

@faustogonzalez7693 10 ай бұрын

The S-400 have no competition.....this Is the king of the Air defent system.....

@borcemiovski Жыл бұрын

What about S500 and S550?

@johnisraeldube3133 Жыл бұрын

S 400 is a better system

@wojtekmleczaj6603 Жыл бұрын

😂😂😂

@alexandermutune6131 Жыл бұрын

@@wojtekmleczaj6603 true 💯.

@wojtekmleczaj6603 Жыл бұрын

@@alexandermutune6131 😂😂😂🤡🤡

@alexandermutune6131 Жыл бұрын

@@wojtekmleczaj6603 😜

@Dynaceglobalnigeria Жыл бұрын

The Russian MOD doesn't assume the capability of the S400 & that's why the missile defence systems of Russia in the SMO taking place in Ukraine is what it is

@prizefighter8699 11 ай бұрын

Russia ain't using its s400 in that if they are using air defences its other versions which are highly mobile and short range

@user-yb7zn2re8j 5 ай бұрын

Show me, where and when did patriot work work normally? Покажите мне, где и когда патриот отработал нормально?

@olegivaskiv3850 17 күн бұрын

Короче все эти цифры на бумаге ничего не значат, с-400 массово горят от старых американских баллистических ракет

@olesbondar915 Жыл бұрын

Everything is better in Russia until it comes down to practice in reality :)

@MultiNike79 Жыл бұрын

Россия где-то украла Патриот и сегодня обстреливала им Киев. К счастью, киевский патриот смог сбить все ракеты врукопашную.

@ice4516 Жыл бұрын

Exactly!! Kinzal was very effective weapon)))))

@MultiNike79 Жыл бұрын

@@ice4516 Well, the Patriot still shot it down. With own body.

@ValentainSun 10 ай бұрын

In Ukraine we all see how Russians kick ass west technologies)

@wsm7929 Жыл бұрын

If I wanted point defence for example, defending an airfield or a base I would choose the Patriot every time because thats what it's designed to do. If I wanted area denial air defence the s400 because that's what it's designed for.

@mackjsm7105 5 ай бұрын

If I had to choose.. I'd go for the Russian system. More flexible and the cost of the patriot is crazy.

@issasn82 Жыл бұрын

Both systems are just unbelivable engeneering

@ahmedasoj3192 Жыл бұрын

S 400 is the best, patriot has recently been used in Ukraine. Everyone is aware that Russian hypersonic missiles destroyed one and badly damaged the other one. So S400 is the best air defence system.

@Maddog-xc2zv 10 ай бұрын

russians haven't destroyed any patriot. if you learned how to read and to listen, just a luncher was damaged and was repaired and ressent again. Russian missiles and iranian drones are being shot like ducks with Patriots, NASAM, Iris-T, SAMP/T (which maybe better than the patriot). on the other hand 2 launcher of a s-400 system were demolished with himars rockets, which russians say to be so easy to destroy as we have been seeing. wake up, dude. Big bear USSR is gone forever and Russia is an unworthy substitute. China is more powerful than Russia no questions asked. Russia become just a regional power, is no longer playing with the major players.

@charlesrichardson8635 10 ай бұрын

Since not one Kinzhal missile out of the 21 shot hit Kyiv, you're just lying again. In fact everyone is laughing about how the invincible Kinzhal didn't stand a chance. NOTE: over 32 Iskander-M ballistic missiles were downed at the same times. Four attacks and all destroyed.🤣🤣🤣🤣

@ClayCowgill 9 ай бұрын

Seems every single comment I've read says the S-400 is best-- often pointing out the same advantages it supposedly possesses over the Patriot... Yet, simultaneously, I am watching a video on Twitter/X of a Ukrainian Neptune missile blowing an S-400 installation off the face of the Earth in Crimea two days ago-- in broad daylight-- while a Ukrainian surveillance drone loiters overhead recording the whole thing in glorious HD-- with nary a hint of a response from the S-400 battery. 🤔Maybe the Russians just forgot to plug it in? 🤷‍♂

@njikangclifford8259 5 ай бұрын

Maybe you could give a reference to your imaginary video?

@florinardelean4760 4 ай бұрын

Da linkul la videoclip, ba...... Vrem sa-l vedem si noi, ori este secret?

@eddysamiearteengarabetbalt8860 Жыл бұрын

Never compare never assume between defence systems

@user-pu8rp9il6f 5 ай бұрын

In 2019, Patriot overslept an attack on an oil refinery in Saudi Arabia. В 2019 году Патриот проспал атаку на нефтеперерабатывающий завод в Саудовской Аравии.

@bakrusochaitom6589 Жыл бұрын

S400 is better than patriot missile

@adelbertantonio2937 Жыл бұрын

Tell me did S-400 intercept any IAF plane in Syria so far ? F-16 and F-35 are making fun of its defense system!!! The best of hype with S-400!

@gaborjuracsik4847 Жыл бұрын

@@adelbertantonio2937 Are you seriously implying that he should have taken down machines that are not officially at war with the country? Are you playing World War III?

@ALLUREpe21 Жыл бұрын

@@adelbertantonio2937 🤣🤣🤣 I see patriot is very effective in Ukrania 👉🇺🇸😭😭😭😭

@user-hr3vx4qx4i Жыл бұрын

Then one patriot missile, then correct)))

@user-io7id4xs5q 7 ай бұрын

@@adelbertantonio2937а зачем С-400 перехватывать самолёты в Сирии?