That applies to almost all military aircraft and aircraft equipment. Air Force’s ain’t cheap. For most in Air Force’s, air force personnel enjoy working on something so cool.

That something was made by a squadron way bigger than any squadron a soldier has ever seen

Yup

Yeah, so what is the point other than whining?

Sounds awesome

@Timmy Pruitt I bet you said that, but you don’t even know what it means.

@Timmy Pruitt bold of you to assume he's ever been invited to one

To shoot what? ... lol ...

LMAO ... LOL ... LOL ... this one worth one billion dollars ... would you take a check ? ... LOL ...

FYI the 10 minute length initiates full KZfaq monetization. In other words, a 10 minute KZfaq video is the optimal length for monetization.

All very true.....unless your enemy has an S-400, then your toast. these fighter aircraft are obsolete tools of war, same as aircraft carriers, these implements are used mostly against tribal war lords, or drug cartel kingpins, also, to keep the military industrial complex money machine turning.

@@homosapienze well, F35 worked without issue in Syria by Israelis

@@homosapienze I am not disagreeing with anything, I was just plain stating what actually happened in the real world. Did F35i's successfully attack in areas covered by S300/400 without getting detected? YES, repeatedly. Has any F35 been shot down by S300/400 so far? NO, not once. just that simple. Therefore I don't see how "S400 Sams eat F35's for breakfast" Otherwise, I wouldn't doubt anything else you mentioned as I simply don't see any proof to agree or dispute on. Also, it is a well-known question regarding the effectiveness of the S400 capability in detecting any stealth jets, given they quoted a 600km of effective range.

@@homosapienze I don't know what makes you such a hostile personality that I started to feel sorry for you. I was just simply stating the results of the real world and you began throwing me a bunch of "theories" "Critical thinking requires that you test your theories to destruction before you go public" So, please enlighten me, what sort of tests have you done on those theories to destruction, as you said, before your unsophisticated posts that make you appear foolish? Were you, personally in one of those F-35i's during the attacks? Were you being tracked? Did the S400 catch you? "Never argue with Idiots, they will attempt to lower you to their level and beat you with experience" love your quotes btw, funny guy

If you are flying any aircraft into a SAM situation, you have been left without other options. The pilots learn to train against targeting systems and how to fly somewhat damaged, if no f35s were shot down there’s a huge portion of talent to be given toward intel and the pilots. But knowing the technology is always changing and parts on these systems could improve, you don’t wanna poke the bear.

Claro que si.

Nyemplung lagi

IGUAL VALE VERGA VA AÑOS CON EL PROBLEMA DEL CAÑON ,, ADEMAS NOOO POOSEE ULTRAMANIOBRABILIDAD

I feel like the B variant is smaller than the A vriant right? They don't have the same width, the B variant is kinda smaller and might be lighter than the others.

The only significant difference in dimensions between the three models is that the C model has a wingspan of 13.1 meters whilst the A and B models have a span of 10.7 meters.

In essence, the A and B are nearly identical in size (small differences in the engine nozzle), while the C has a notably larger wing, both in width and length. This allows for lower approach speeds needed for carrier landings. Despite their similar sizes, the B is substantially heavier (~2,500 lbs) than the A due mostly to the STOVL system (ducted fan, articulating nozzle, etc.) It also has a much lower fuel capacity and payload than the A. The C is the heaviest due to the larger wings, reinforced landing gear, arrestor hook, etc. Basically, the same disadvantages that every navilized version of an aircraft has.

yep a gatling cannon is always your last resort. But u need it for when shit hits the fan and also its very useful for multi-role fighters like the f35 cus they can do a-10 like CAS

the problem is that when two modern jets merge, one or both of them has to die. There is no extending away. there is no escape. It doesn't cost much at all to implement a cannon with a few hundred rounds of ammo. The jet, especially one as heavy and bulky as the F35, isn't going to perform particularly better without it. There's no reason to rob the pilot of the only weapon that will work when two jets are within a km or so of one another.

@@Gorilla2412 All true.

@@TheGrammargestapo1 I agree for the most part, except the point you made about it’s weight. I researched that, and the guns weight is significant. There’s a whole bunch a plane can do with that amount of freed up weight and space. At least a bomb or two in weight, and a decent amount of avionics with the freed up space. One problem. Big problem. Pilot moral would plummet if they don’t get a gun for their last resort effort at living. Say what you will it makes no difference. It’s a dead issue. It doesn’t matter what anyone believes, the pilots don’t feel safe without one. I tend to agree, even though what I think doesn’t matter. Usually the word, “stigma,’ is a negative connotation, but it doesn’t have to be. For instance, like a plane without a gun is stigmatized, right or wrongly, as being vulnerable by the pilots, likewise, any jet presented to the US Navy for consideration as the latest backbone of the fleet, like the F18 is, that doesn’t have two engines, is stigmatized as a risk to the life of the pilot by the Navy brass. It’s nearly impossible to get past the stigma, even though the single engine F35 has only “crashed” in the true sense of the word only once, for reasons unknown, and that only after seventeen (17) years in service. The single engine state of the F35 is the biggest reason the Navy hasn’t jumped at stocking the fleet with F35’s. Frankly, I don’t know why the military doesn’t just make a two engine F35?

1. The F-35 has only one engine because it is a “budget-aircraft” its exported to alot of western countries and adding another engine wouldve genuinely increased costs by a serious margin. (Also you cant really chance that single engine design aftewards because if you look at the way planes are made they have a big part of then designed around the engine. 2. The gun serves an incredibly useful factor which nobody here has gone further indepth on. But that is aerial support for ground troops. A burst of 20mil could be detrimental for the survival of ground troops in contact. The f-35 actually shows that it follows this doctrine by coming equiped with a 25Mil cannon which is more usefull against ground targets compared to the 20MM which is better for aerial targets. 3 there are certain manouvers that let you escape out of a dogfight situation. Keep in mind that even a missile like an AMRAAM has only a 4 Nm range against a target that is flying away at high speed at a low level. Creating 4 Nm of distance between you and an opponent isnt impossible if you are in a supersonic jet 4 putting a multi barreled gatling gun that also needs space for ammunition on a plane is a serious design factor. (The F/A-18 has a long nose to fit both the gun and the radar, the A-10 is even designed around the gun it has) altough there are examples of planes later receiving the ability to carry gunpods like the AV-8b harrier, F-35 (some versions) or the L-39ZA

that's well over 1500 rounds, not 300; also 300 rounds would not even be 0.1 seconds of fire lol

@@LIONTAMER3D That’s BS, an m61 can’t shoot that fast.

@@LIONTAMER3D Do the math, you get exactly 3 seconds of shooting with 300 rounds

@@Maverickf20 that's like 30,000 rounds 0.o

@@LIONTAMER3D An m61 shoots at 6,000 rounds per minute. Set up a ratio, its 3 seconds for 300 rounds

@1Juemadre Now tell us how you take off and land a crosswind, Squidward.

The gatling was reported ineffective for the f35. It was written that firing the gun destabilized too much the aircraft and would modify the behavior of the plane. The pentagone managed to solve this alert by writing on the report that not using the gatling will solve this issue

That never happened

ALL THE BRANCHES WITHIN OUR BELOVED UNITED STATES MILITARY ARE KICK ASS. AIN'T NO BETTER.

Maybe that´s due to the fact that it still doesn´t exist...

Don't think it exists yet

@@mindtraveller100 that's what they want you to believe I think it's just because they're trying to keep it on the super DL If I was a betting man, I'd put some money down that there's one hiding somewhere near Groom Lake

It's the Shaka sign

Nothing about this plane is worth every penny, its a cost overrun nightmare and literally robs US taxpayers and provides absolutely no benefit to our national defense effort as its designed to fight enemies that don't fucking exist. The F-35 is THE best example of corporate welfare that you can point at.

It's usually 2-3 second bursts but the stress on the airframe is still insane

BULLETS IN THE COCKPIT BAAAHAAHAAHAA 😂😂😂😂🤣🤣😂😆😆😆😆

Shut up

🤣🤣🤣🤣

@@vasiliykislov8572 🤡🤡🤡🤡

@@hollow_9476 🚾🚾🚾🚾

muy muy costosa, y con constantes problemas y fallos.

Bruh defenitly not

looks more like a fly. dung fly.

Most fighters can do that today. Network-centric comunication has been developed and studied for the last 30 years at least

korona hehehe

It's not cause when they see it they will make theirs bettet

@@josefpaul4688 sarcasm

If you are seeing it in this video they already know about it..we are 20 years ahead of what you are looking at now most likely.

@@hkn7286 222 de

Engine on the recording aircraft I believe. Either way, it is an engine.

It lined well tho

Thats the bomb Im pretty sure

@@inverspe9774 It's not. That low whistle is the engine. A falling bomb would not make that whistling noise, nor would it be loud enough to hear from the cockpit of another aircraft.

doubt it

acho feio parece um mosquito

@@mhenrique4860 mosquito? Kkkkkk 😂

@@mhenrique4860 o f22 também é feio né ? Kkkkkk 😂 ,deve parecer uma rola né ? 😲😂

30mm murder bananas I love it that line cracker me hell up especially if you picture that literally In your head like I did

🛩 just for you , don't give it to anyone

Santa will have a heck of a job trying to stuff it down the chimney.

@@dsalpha18 Let's try teleportation. If Santa must distribute gifts to 1.5 billion children scattered in 224 nations and regions, fanning out on 135 million km square, in one night, he must use teleportation as the solusion.

Yep, I saw that too.

That’s his pinky, not his middle. 🤙

Landing 3wheel take off 3wheel.. handicap.😁😂😜

@Fondil Mahbols i think you haven't tested a lemon.

@@michaelmoore1932 its a hawaaiian sign

He pointed up at the end. It's an apotropaic gesture, which means a gesture used to ward off bad luck. Common on flight decks.

@@oakpkdude yeah, It's a common gesture in my neck of the woods too...LOL

0:56 for the GAU-22

A-10 is the one USAF can't replace it

If it wasn't for all that "crap" as you call it you probably wouldn't be posting in English on KZfaq. The guy in cockpit relies on everyone, including the person back at the officer's dining room peeling his potatoes. It's a team. Period. 🇺🇸 🗽

@Karbon Workshop 😆 You want fried rice with that comment ? 🍚

@Karbon Workshop Good come back for a guy up posting on KZfaq at 4am, meth or minimum wage 3rd shift while blowing it in on your free government phone ?

You'd think that an aircraft that cost more than the entire Iraq war to finance would have that feature.

😂 😂 au moins quelque chose fonctionne sur cet Avion, ça fait une belle DCA volante à plus $100 millions

@@legiopatrianostra4702 C'est une brique volante mdrr

ol

Not too many people will understand what you mean.

Or the radome and canopy of A-10 Warthogs, which use Gats immensly.

@@bikescarsandeverythinginbe7309 IYKYK

lmfao

Nope

A10 2000-3700 rounds a minute. F35 3300 rounds a minute. So the f35s shoots faster most times, I’m pretty sure the a10s shots are bigger tho. We shouldn’t even be comparing because there 2 totally different kinds of aircraft, the f35s just better.

Oh wait the a10 does shoot faster. But the f35 is far superior.

The two planes are built for different purposes, the F-35 is multipurpose the A-10 is air to ground anti vehicle, the F-35 costs more to maintain and needs a paved runway to function, the A-10 is cheap and effective with great fuel efficiency and can land on a dirt road covered in razor blades, the F-35 has a smaller gun than the A-10, the A-10 flies slower than the F-35 to maximize its airtime to allow the pilot to acquire targets as he or she plummets towards the earth, either way the F-35 is not replacing the A-10 warthog nor will it ever because the army won’t let the Air Force retire it, and the army practically owns the air force indirectly

@@twoarc7293 and the f35 is stealth the a10 isn’t.

All that stealth isn't worth spit in a CAS mission against a guy armed with a gun with enough reach and an eyeball mk I.

f22 + f35 = Cy-57 ☝😊🌟🚩🌟

Yes. The same gun that the Harrier already had many years ago. And the gun in the "old" F15, F16, and F18 "only" fires 6000 rpm... Insane, isn´t it?

@@mindtraveller100 it's a good gun.

@@mindtraveller100 Russian ГШ-6-23 fires 9,000 rpm at 23 mm calibre! Incredible, isn't she?

CCP China laught to this Americans naiveness. LOL No need more research, just wait for its secrets on KZfaq.... ^_^

I wish the same. But if you want a rough estimate you can divide pounds by 2, and you have kilos.

2000 lbs - 1ton.....you right that was hard as freezer meat😯🤯

@@cjjonez What a calculation man.... Just that if you have used Google, you would have found that 2204 lb is a tonne Now try converting 75 tonne to pounds in under 5 seconds, and educate us how easy it was, I bet like freezer meat. Ohh btw, 75 tonnes is 75000 kgs and yeah it was really hard, like a freezer meat

I wish other countries would stop trying to tell America how to do stuff. We single-handedly created the modern world with our system. I think it works fine. Good day.

@@mikebode3740 Even the language used here is of west Germanic origin and they single-handedly created the modern world... epitome of confidence.

✋😇