Yeh...Public Hwy quallified with Zero traffic.

​@@matrox I would prefer to land on a wider deck like an aircraft carrier has than a very long straight but NARROW road on a fighter jet.

It's not a highway. It's a countryroad and they made some extra meters wide for 1500 meters.

Man, that is not a highway, that is a Landsväg. They are really narrow.

@@jonanolakers1567 It's not that fucking narrow... Have you been to one of the roads they land jets on in Sweden cuz I have, and they are wider than normal landsväg...

Those clever Swedes...Gripen is best IKEA unit Designed to fly from any highway, yet fit sleekly into any living room decor?!?😂😂

Speaking of shit hitting fans, do F35's have the same sensitivity as F16s to debris on runways? I heard F16 runways are walked by ground staff to clear rubbish by hand.

I agree on all counts but, having said that, there is not much a Gripen cannot do. As for the F-35 Fighting Turkey, I suppose it could managed if it only needed fuel and ammo.

@@brendandennis5868 Unlikely. The placement of the F-16’s air intake is its biggest liability on the ground.

I can service the A-10, I've made one 1/48 model. Know every part of it ;)

Россия делает заметки

​@@billyjoe3309 muskovy already knows since the system was developed in the 1950ies, but there are too many of these backup airfield roads to monitor if they wanted to be cute and pick a fight, far too many to monitor even with drones. Remember, each road base will only be in use for around 45minutes at a time, and never more than once every few days... The Gripen pilots wouldn't even be told exactly what road base to use for RTB until they are within a couple of minutes flying from the road base and can pick up the pings of the mobile radio nav beacon. All the pilots get in their in-flight briefing is a primary and alternate return heading and a time window for each, no coordinates.

@@SonsOfLorgar Россия делает заметки

@@billyjoe3309 Taking notes its the only thing Russia army is capable of

If you travel around Sweden you'll find lots of roads with mid barriers near small hangers. So they'd just remove those for the time being.

Roll of eyes!! They selected a good quality road for the video!

We have our fair share of potholes also in Finland. Our road infrastructure gets back a fraction of the amount our government taxes road traffic. It's been like that for couple decades now.

These are not any highways "in europe". These are dispersed stretches that are purposly reinforced and planned to be used as make shift runways when they were built to handle this since their inception and made sure to always be upkept to the highest standard. At least that has been the case for the Swedish highways as this kind of operation has been part of Swedish doctrine for the last 50-60 years.

Beat me to it :-)

@@newera478All nordic contrys have their fair share of frostbitten roads.

I came

That was unexpected

A10 more iconic than F16s and F35 I think

@@allenl9214 A10 most iconic since the F-4.

In Finland there is publicly known at least some couple dozen places in the road network, which can be used as a airplane field if it becomes necessary. They practice the takeoffs and landings periodically, just like in the video. This is all just a part of preparation for defending the country against possible war of aggression. I believe also Baltic states have quite high rate of preparing to any kind of hostile movements. Finland did never cancel conscription so basically every finnish man have been trained for war, if they had no health issues preventing it. Nowdays also women have the option to go to army if they choose so.

Wow ! I’m impressed 👍

@@captainhappy Excellent! Impressive!

Even a few warthogs (aka Tank killers) in the mix!

As all airfields are prime targets there is no other option than to turn to highways. The Germans did it on a small scale during WWII and kept doing it during g the Cold War.

Saab cars where underrated too

I dont think its very underrated & neither was Saab as a car brand? Instead i think neither are "as common" simply because they were/are being produced in smaller numbers? in the case of cars (when they still made them) they clearly didn't even get to a quarter of the production of their competition & you could easily find 5x the BMW or Mercedes or Volkswagen dealers for every Saab dealer, in the case of F35 vs Gripen i'm 99% sure they produce something like double the amount of F35's a year (or more?) because it's simply a much bigger (collab of) organization(s) And at the end of the day when a government finally decides to upgrade their jet fleet they want them as soon as possible 🤷‍♂

It's a capable and affordable plane, but unfortunately not stealth which is the name of the game nowadays.

@@QuerientjeI still miss my Saab 96 built in 1972. Had to say goodbye in 1986.😥

@@Mk-qb2ny na missle range and interference, people give stealth to much weight, with todays ai radar system its close to impossible to hide.

The man

that fly by whistle sound is all most as good than BRRRRR. my favorite mill plane easily.

Only the MAGAts owned by Boeing and Lockheed are preventing that.

As a Former Grunt...It's a Grunts Best Friend.

@@JoJo-ps4ml Baby. Once a grunt, always a grunt. 4/23rd 9ID. Best Regards and Best Wishes!

@@Jakedelus "The wheels on the bus go ... BBRRRRTTTTTTT..".

Very funny😂Rick : Syd : Australia

Had that once from a UK copper. Mate got caught speeding, and the first line from the copper was "Hello Wing Commander, having problems taking off this morning?"

@@johnmartin2464😂very good.

I swear, officer, I forgot the permit for conceiled carry of air-to-air missiles when I bought my new F-35. That must happen every now and then.

グリペンからではなく冷戦時代に運用されたドラケン、ビゲンも同様の運用を可能にしてます……ただＡ－１０やＦ－３５を一般道を離着陸させるとなると航空甲版並の管理を要するので即応性に関してはサーブ社の戦闘機は優れてます。スウェーデンの高速道路は滑走路と同じ仕様にされている事やシェルターが点在していたり高速道路を隠すための偽装用の住宅がある。

そうだね。トンネルが格納庫になるし、中に整備用のハンガーも併設されているんだよ。

​​@@akioh2782 not in Sweden, on the road bases it's open air readying pads with a fake tree top cover suspended on metal wires, but each road base will only be used for 45minutes at a time and never more than once every 2-3days. There are thousands of them all over the country.

路面がコンクリであればよいがアスファルトであれば通常の約3倍以上の強度が必要になる。

I have enough trouble following center line while on a bicycle

Norwegian F-16 Pilots have been known to be the bad ass of the skies. Now we will see how this transit into the new platform. Starting from scratch, basically.

It's a quite different system in training compared to most countries, the pilots stay active for longer and have more tactical responsibilities. There's been some talk about how it will integrate with NATO. Regular troops where the same, 9 months of Swedish training was the same as 36 months in America (that was the 90's though, I'm not sure how it's now).

You reckon if Russia marches into Finland, the US will come to its rescue against the possibility of Russia levelling your cities with hypersonic nukes for which you have no protection and means to shoot down? I admire your courage but we need realism here.

When have you been in Finland and Sweden?

@@claus-not-santa ....why are there no bones in ice cream?

@@markp1506 Ask the producers………..

@@claus-not-santa …….for bones or ice cream?

Alien-tech

Pakistani pilots are doing it for the last 15 years

@@shaharyarqureshi6894 Americans have been doing it since WWII on moving Ships 🛳️ actually Allied pilots have to learn to fly in America also.

@@shaharyarqureshi6894 as a matter of fact the purpose of that exercise was to show Russia and China they could blow up airfields and we including all Allied pilots could land anywhere in the world and again we’ve been doing it since WWII

@@shaharyarqureshi6894 Actually I was wrong we’ve been doing it since 1910

The fighter was designed to make money und to kill people.

Literally all highways in Europe and the US are designed so that fighters can land on them.

oh!

驚かない！ ガッカリした！ まあいつ吸気ハッチ開くのかって見てたら、出てきたのがA１０。 すっかり怒りは何処へやらw

it's A型

CGI?😂

I think it’s very practical. It requires far less man hours of maintenance per flight hour than the F-16 and only one has to be a specialist. And still 100% nato compatible.

I thought the F35 was going down a bit too hard lol.

@@dixonqwerty yeah, first one scared me a bit xD

Different wing sweep means different aerodynamics, and accordingly different speed and angle of attack on the glide path.

F35の着陸シーンだけ2 倍速で再生されていますね。

With the F35, Vietnam and Afghanistan would have been won.

@jamiefairlie4837 - А скоро падать будут . И не только на дорогу !🤣

Greetings from Ukraine! I wish Finland a peaceful sky!

@@user-ks5kc5qs2c I live in the United States. My late father was conceived here in the United States, born in Finland, and returned to the United States with my Grandmother when he was 7. I just visited his first cousins in 2022. I did not want to leave. Such a beautiful country!

how do we know where is the next spot ?

@@bobsnabby2298 I believe the Finnish forces would let the public know when the highway is being closed. They do these exercises in the summer. You can search for videos of past exercises here on KZfaq by typing: "Finnish Air Force landing on highway" or something like that.

The US Interstate system was envisioned by Eisenhower to have 1 mile of straight road every 5 or 10 miles for same purpose. Welcome To Ukraine! 💛💙🇺🇦🇩🇪🇪🇪🇱🇻🇱🇹🇸🇪🇵🇱 Slava Ukraini and Heroyam Slava! 🇺🇦🇩🇪🇪🇪🇱🇻🇱🇹🇸🇪🇵🇱💛💙.

@@hanovergreen4091 Exactly! The entire purpose of the interstate system was the same as Hitler's autobahns (I HATE acknowledging that!) - rapid deployment of military assets within the nation, Ease of cross country travel for commerce and citizenry was just a happy by-product and political selling-point... Slava Ukraini!!! 🦾

@@bavery6957 Welcome To Ukraine! 💛💙🇺🇦🇩🇪🇪🇪🇱🇻🇱🇹🇸🇪🇵🇱 Slava Ukraini and Heroyam Slava! 🇺🇦🇩🇪🇪🇪🇱🇻🇱🇹🇸🇪🇵🇱💛💙.

A.H. was doing it in late 1930s

日本有自主研发的五代战机吗

Indicative that other (non Skandinavian) NATO airforces are picking up those skills again.

Exactly.

​@@JZsBFFИ для чего они это делают? Для чего им эти компетенции?

​@@jimm8745Почему Швеция не осталась нейтральной страной?! Швеция хочет получить возмездие от России , за все страдания ,принесённые грёбаными шведами , за многие века?!

@@user-nd5ez3xp5k Γιατί γείτονες

I think the Norwegians wanted this so their planes have parachutes, I think, to make the landing possible. I think it requires lots of manhours of service per flighthour and every one must receive training and education before they can be used.

@@TheFrewah the parachute is to land on icy conditions where breaking is difficult

Yeah, the F35 won't re-arm and re-fuel in 10min with a ground crew of a few conscripts and a technician, also note that the F35 didn't land on an actual normal road; yes the strip is used as a road for regular vehicles, but Finland, unlike Sweden, are depending largely on "regular" modified/significantly widened roads for dispersed operations, where Gripen can really take off and land on a regular 16x800m road.

It’s only a matter of time. Now the french has promised mirage as well so there is no reason to prevent the ukrainians to use gripen any more…

I wish the war can stop.

While I think it's possibly true, the nature of how Sweden's air force was designed to be distributed isn't necessarily something that can be mapped over to a centralised force in short order.

The challenge of operating three separate fighter systems with unique requirements on crew and maintenance resources might be a stretch even for someone as motivated as the Ukrainians would be

You're signing up for the trenches in Ukraine? Or has another dude to go first?

With the F35, Vietnam and Afghanistan would have been won.

I just call them wartime air strips whenever I drive over one and someone is asking about them. There are plenty of those.

It is normal. Pilots do this all the time. It means we have more runways than planes.

Scotland the Brave 　Invasion of Normandy(Operation Neptune)　 I'm Japanese, but cheers to this great operation and to our brave soldiers!

@@n1k2-ja46 Hello my new Japanese friend, so I sub to your channel, cheers Fabrizio

Dat's kinda da point :). Best Regards and Best Wishes!

Note that the F35 footage is not actually a regular road; Finland relies largely on modified and significantly widened roads for their dispersed operations. You can actually tell quite easily from the footage that it's not a normal road, unlike the Gripen footage. Also, it didn't sacrifice those things; it opted for dispersed operations with minimal ground crew and infrastructure demands. F35 simply cannot match the efficiency and frugality of the Gripen in that aspect, and the F35 is by nature then more vulnerable to attacks on its infrastructure. But that vulnerability wasn't a concern for the US, as the risk of anyone invading them is simply close to zero.

Mach 2. That's a few penalty points on the license.

I bet i hasnt.. Live close to one too, and youngsters here are so law abiding they would never do stuff like that.

@@mikkoj1977 Naaw! The kids of today are way too legal 😅 It’s the perfect spot to do +250 km/h without endangering someone else.

At least in the case of Gripen it has nothing to do with emergency. In case of war ordinary roads would be used instead of airbases for safety reason. The Swedish air force has operated like that since the Cold War.

@@gunnarmedin4104 Thank you for the helpful information. Makes a lot of good sense in the time of War. Russians can damage air bases but they cannot do the same to all the roads in Finland. Wish your Country the Best.

@@fasx56I think you mean Sweden, not Finland.

@@TheFrewah My mix up.

@@TheFrewah It's true for Finland too. Last time they bought fighter airplanes, they chose the F/A-18 specifically because it can be operated this way. (The F/A-18 was really designed to work from hangarships but that's very similar conditions.) Officially Finland has 12 stretches of road that have been prepared to function as air bases but there's a good chance there are more they keep secret. The Finnish Air Force is upgrading to F-35 now and it was not really designed to operate from field air bases but the Norwegian Air Force has been working on the issues and as you see in this video they've got most of them sorted out by now.

It's a drag chute pod. Norwegian F-35 have those installed incase of slippery and short runways in winter. So far it is only Norway that has those installed.

Correct, Cta2006. That "bump" on the engine cowling, between the two vertical stabilizers, is the cover of The F-35A Drag Chute System, developed on request from the Royal Norwegian Air Force (RNoAF), which also had the same/similar system developed for the Norwegian F-16 jets and in RNoAF operation since 1980 (first F-35 received in 2017 and all F-16s were phased out in 2020, of which 32 were sold to Romania and 22 donated to Ukraine). They will stabilize and shorten the distance on runway on landing, to be used for for short and icy runways (Norway's "Kortbanenenett", aka Short Runway Network, are non-standard 800 metre short runways for small airfields built in rural areas during the 1970s, in addition to the standard length runways of the major airports. Northernmost airfield on mainland Norway is at 71th parallel North, and the northernmost airfield on Svalbard is at 79 degrees north, so ice is common. If interested, you can find a couple of videos on the Lockheed Martin KZfaq account which demonstrates how it works (search for "Lockheed Martin F-35 Drag Chute System" on KZfaq). In the Lockheed Martin videos you can see the chute exits, after the cover is lifted vertically by a hydraulic system, slows down and stabilizes the aircraft. There are also a few videos of the RNoAF F-16 deploying its drag chute, which is mounted at the lower rear end of the F-16 vertical stabilizer. It is said that also Denmark, Netherlands and Belgium (and most likely Finland) will get the Drag Chute System, too. This is quite a useful F-35 option in the high-latitude region (Norway, Finland).

@@Cta2006 oh that makes sense, thanks!

Well its in the design of the plane and we did this since the 50s , F35 is an amazing bird but the planes are built for different kinda military conflicts.

Two different roads, and the F-35 weighs twice as much.

@@guyfromthe80s92 well if ur reply os on me read mine again.

I didn't detect any struggle for the F-35s landing.

I think it's good to have a few different platforms, complementing each other.