Aaaa

Yt?

@@shr1293 താങ്കൾ ഇതു ഒരു പുച്ഛം പോലെ പറയുന്നത് എന്തിന് എന്ന് മനസ്സിൽ അകുനില...i don't think anybody should feel bad about being ezahava if that was the case. They were a hardworking group of people unlike freeloading Brahmins. The problem is that it is more likely that the Syrian Christian caste formed originally as Christian/Jewish traders സംഗരം, and later by marriage bonding with Shudra women and Christian traders. Since there were no Kshatriyas and since ezahavas were not shudras (they were untouchable outcaste ,chandalas), this is the most likely scenerio. Although, I agree that this could easily happen at an earlier period before brahminization, when caste divisions were not very strong. Also, In the case of Ezahavas, large numbers become Latin catholic at the time of Portuguese. Check ചെപ്പെടുകൾ and also works by vinil paul, etc. were ezahavas were given to Syrian Christians as slaves and service castes. Check also video by മാളവിക ബിന്നി on കൂനൻ കുരിശ് സത്യം were she quotes Pious Malekandathil and Susan Viswanathan s works on the topic.