IT is a tragedy for ALL involved, the families and friends and people of Canton, it's PD, First Responders, Mass State Police, all those men and women in Emergency Services, Law Enforcement who have been so unjustly judged and unfairly maligned over the course of this investigation and trial process

@@AnnMcHale Nope... John O’Keefe is the only victim.

Pray In Jesus Name God intervene with your Justice mercy goodness faithfulness Amen

@@musicismysanctuary5813 Correct! and KAREN READ KILLED HIM

She worked extremely hard and professionally all the way.

@@UNiKA_Eye_Color_Inspired who? Bev? Nope.

@@BostonMA781 No, the Honorable Beverly Cannone.

It's not in evidence so she can't give it to them.

I have one on my arm too and I can tell you I never got a bruise with it. I've also been hit by a car (at a much lower speed) and I was bruised from asshole to breakfast time so . . . .

2 medical examiners said he wasn’t hit by a vehicle. His arm injuries looked like dog bites and claws. 2 experts in reconstruction of accidents said vehicle did not hit him. So not guilty/innocent.. probable dog attacked knocked him dow the stairs and he hit his head. Someone moved him to the yard. Sad they didn’t call it in as an accident. He might have lived . Karen is innocent

Definitely dog attack.

The injuries not adding up tells me everything

The defense showed no discomfort with them whatsoever.

Stinky is guilty,

@@musicismysanctuary5813 .. I agree he was either beaten or the dog attacked and he fell backward on the stairs hit the back of his head and they carried him outside. If they would have called for help he may have lived. The house was never checked. They re-homed the dog immediately and moved within a couple of days…outrageous

I can’t stand Karen and her arrogant face

True but Karen is still guilty,

Are you really that gullible? The digital evidence submitted in court places O'Keefe motionless in the area close to the dividing line between 32 and 34 Fairview the duration 12.32 and 6.15 when He was recovered. Karen Read's SUV recorded her reversing back over 60 ft at 24 mph hitting him. These pieces of independent indisputable evidence informs what happened to John O'Keefe-only Karen Read can tell us Why.

@@tracychase40you’d be upset too if falsely accused of a crime

I really don't want to see that. 🤮

bom chika wowow

I haven't followed up on the judge. Why is everyone saying she sucks? Genuine question

Amen…and justice for John O’Keefe.

I ask where would this be if not for A Jackson..he caught this as well as the Sally Port video..are the Feds watching-Chief Justice..someone needs to step in here..

Why, because she's not bowing to the defense at every turn?

@@UNiKA_Eye_Color_Inspired Just being neutral would be nice.

@@TheGdav0202 She must pick winners and losers.

⁠@@UNiKA_Eye_Color_Inspired unfair. because she seems to favor defense. 11:41

She probably has more than once case

Certainly not hers.

@@B-ch6uk would that be important to you if she was proceeding over your case?

Pamprin is more like it. Disgusting and pathetic to meltdown like this!

KR's constant smiling, laughing and smirking should worry you more.

The Jury will do their due diligence-there is 4 weeks testimony to discuss.

I feel like we need a Tom Petty song! “The waiting is the hardest part”

That is what it should be... but this Commonwealth... . idk .... no trust in them

@@DAISYCHEWYandMEthe Supreme Court sucks even more!

The Commonwealth is full of corruption!!

25 yrs no parole

They proved the case

The CW's evidence clearly point to KR's guilt.

Me either. it is SO obvious that this little old lady with gray hair and wearing diapers who was the ONLY one in that group that wasn't MARRIED to a cop and who was about to be dumped by him, drank NINE drinks, got into that Lexus and RAN HIM DOWN. "Hell Hath No Fury like an Old Fart In Diapers who is DRUNK and being rejected by the man she wanted to MARRY to get his money, health insurance and pension, like all the OTHER women in that group". This whole groups of cops and their soccer mom wives are a bunch of misfits. But they ALL had financial security because they were MARRIED to cops. NOT KAREN, This was her LAST CHANCE in that club of misfits and she was being dumped . SHE RAN HIM DOWN, Evil old gray haired devil in diapers,

Maybe there's a person stuck on wanting to know who did it if not Karen....and they don't believe a cover-up would be as easy as it actually was to pull off. The 11 rational people are spending time going over the 5,000 reasons to acquit, and that takes time. Some people are quite irrational and stubborn.

​@@UNiKA_Eye_Color_InspiredThe lunatics who hear factual, credible, sensible, common sense evidence that the car didnt strike a person, and John's injuries werent caused by a car, from the best experts in the nation used by the DOD and hired by the DOJ...and STILL refuse to accept their testimony as true - are serving on juries and putting innocent people in prison ALL over...ALL the time. WHY, then, is this our chosen justice system? Any of us could be imprisoned for something we didn't do because of those jackholes. There are countless accounts of this happening to people who were eventually exonerated upon further investigation. We cannot stand for this. I, for one, don't want these people on my jury if I'm ever falsely accused due to circumstantial evidence or police corruption. I don't want my freedom taken from me because of a few people's blind faith in law enforcement or critique of my facial expressions. Why would anyone decide to put a decision this important in the hands of a jury with NO prerequisite IQ, education, life experience, or open-mindedness? Why wouldn't they have to pass a thorough screening interview, mental health assessment, psychological evaluation, or emotional intelligence screening? It's absurd. KAREN READ IS ALL OF US.

@@ThatRedhedd t is SO obvious that this little old lady with gray hair and wearing diapers who was the ONLY one in that group that wasn't MARRIED to a cop and who was about to be dumped by him, drank NINE drinks, got into that Lexus and RAN HIM DOWN. "Hell Hath No Fury like an Old Fart In Diapers who is DRUNK and being rejected by the man she wanted to MARRY to get his money, health insurance and pension, like all the OTHER women in that group". This whole group of cops and their soccer mom wives are a bunch of misfits. But they ALL had financial security because they were MARRIED to cops. NOT KAREN, This was her LAST CHANCE in that club of misfits and she was being dumped . SHE RAN HIM DOWN, Evil old gray haired devil in diapers,

She’s guilty. How much did she pay you lmfaoooo

As someone who has been on a high-stakes jury before and found the defendant NG, I don't think this is a bad thing. Good jurors want to make sure they have looked at and understood all the evidence before making a decision on someone's life. Remember, this was a 10 week trial with something like 80 witnesses. It was hot in the courthouse. It was hard to hear and hard to see. I'm sure they want to be thorough. I remember for us, the first few hours were simply getting out all our questions and thoughts because we had to keep it to ourselves for so long. Then you sleep on it and think of new things and change your mind. Some people see things differently so we talk it through. The paperwork is also a giant BEAST. The longest time spent was going through each count, making sure we completely understood what it meant and that we answered the counts properly. I really don't think taking time is ever a bad thing. If they were corrupt, they would come back immediately IMO.

troll much?

What happen to I hit him???

@@NeuroSpiceAbeeI agree

They just want justice , it could be any one of us being falsely accused.

It makes one wonder what is the relationships with the lawyers like. Seems very close between them at times, or like they are letting her play lawyer as well. Very odd, never really saw anything like it before.

I get that if you were leaning guilty. But this whole trial and every charge involved is dependent on her hitting him with her car and causing his death. I don't see how you get beyond a reasonable doubt unless you just ignore all of the expert testimony in this case. How do you say the car caused his death if you can't explain how the car caused his injuries?

the verdict form was very confusing and could have easily led them to believe that they have to find guilty for the lesser charge, since No guilty' option wasn't there.

Exactly the only one rushing is the "judge"

Fantastic reply…..I agreed with everything you said - also I’ve been curious, do they really think jurors don’t discuss the case with their significant other? I I know they have to instruct the jury not to speak about the case with anyone or read anything on the case but that must be next to impossible right?

@@shailaja6788couldn’t agree more….this obviously isn’t the 1st time this judge has had a case with these exact charges before. The verdict slip in her previous case(s) either had the not guilty option or not. If it did have it & she altered it specifically for this case than she should be disbarred

Somebody spoke to her. From "That's the way they are" to "the forms have been changed" during that break . .

@@TheGdav0202can you send me the time stamp of when that happened cuz I can’t find it thanks 🙏

@@devenbergeron155 Court TV are uploading it right now.

Thanks toThe Innocence Project, hundreds of wrongfully convicted people have been exonerated after spending YEARS in prison for crimes they didn't commit. Cops are OFTEN corrupt, and the "Blue Wall of Silence" has been reported on in every American city for years. They protect each other, or they lose their jobs. The truth is cops don't want their wrongdoings made public because citizens would lose faith in them, and their reputution would be trash if we knew about all the corruption. So, they've been covering bad acts up, rather than exposing them or punishing them, which only served as a "corruption incubator." Qualified Immunity means zero accountability. The "Blue Wall of Silence" has been reported on in every American city for years. There are plentiful articles & podcasts by investigative journalists exposing it. Cops must fall in line & cover for each other, or they're sabotaged & set up to lose their jobs. It's disgusting & frightening, so most citizens prefer to deny it & pretend it's just a "few bad apples," but a primarily honest institution. However, any review of authority & positions of leadership throughout history proves that power leads to corruption - it is the human condition.

I realize your unfounded & scientifically impossible belief is likely due to your intellectual limitations & isn't your fault. How could Karen have hit John when none of the expected evidence of such a collision exists? Adam Lally & Co. - "She just did!"

There’s absolutely NO evidence that suggests JO’s body was struck by a vehicle. Unbiased professionals (sought after by the FBI, not the state) including a highly accredited medical examiner and two forensic crash experts completely debunked this theory. So please, tell me your reasoning behind this opinion? I’m genuinely curious.

Turtle boy found Jill danil's fake account.

They can’t help themselves

Exactly

She had a major female *&^%$ meltdown! Totally unprofessional!

😂😂😂😂 the judge has no stakes in this. She has a set of Jury instructions that she has to follow and read to the jury, after that it’s out of her hands.

She wants it over, that is clear. She's not powertripping, she gets to decide.

I realize your unfounded & scientifically impossible belief is likely due to your intellectual limitations & isn't your fault. How could Karen have hit John when none of the expected evidence of such a collision exists? Adam Lally & Co. - "She just did!"

Doubt it very much

Justice for who? The perpetrator or the actual victim of her crime? The man She ran down and left gravely injured to die a horrible, cruel untimely and wholly un necessary death because she was angry and upset. Go figure. Those of you who support Karen, electing to ignore the evidence and the facts are complicit with Karen Read in the death of John O'Keefe.

You are forgetting common sense.......but go figure!

Absolutely agree but what we have here in her supporters is a level of ignorance and lack of ability to use common sense to discern credible evidence from red herrings. They have fallen for the nonsense. For some reason it makes more sense to them than the credible evidence. Go figure. I would love to take a poll about level of education, career/job, and whether they are right brain thinkers or left brain thinkers, Any drugs use? Etc. it may be telling.

Because words aren’t facts and there’s no evidence she even said that. Experts testified he did not get hit by a car.

@@Noneofyourbusiness57817 do 4 EMTs stating she said that multiple times isn’t evidence??? Hilarious

Sorry she didn’t say that… she asked if she could have hit him one time… very different… please rewatch trial from beginning… you have missed a lot and pay attention to at least the last 3 experts …

There’s absolutely NO evidence that suggests JO’s body was struck by a vehicle. Unbiased professionals (sought after by the FBI, not the state) including a highly accredited medical examiner and two forensic crash experts completely debunked this theory. People have said things about me that aren’t true (their word vs mine) I’ve had 9 drinks before. Does this mean I’ve killed someone? Correlation does not equal causation!

So what ! People have different ways of expressing nervousness. Some people can be truly innocent but they express themselves in a strange unusual way.That is ridiculous to say that they are guilty because they smirked or rolled their eyes.

She cant win. Half of you people that think shes guilty complain that she always has a "b!tchy" look on her face and never smiles, and the other half of you say "i wouldnt be smirking and laughing." What exactly do you want her to do? Where a mask so you cant see what her expressions are?

@@Senoritagata-nu5te the last thing she looks is nervous

What about all the smirking the other side was doing these damn people with the comments is sickening

Luckily the judge confronted her today. She never showed any emotions for the supposed love of her life and smirked her way through the entire trial. The only thing close to an emotion she showed was the panic over the voice mails.

She's pisssssssed because Bev is biased and unfair and I woulda LAUGHED too!!!! It's too frickin funny seeing Bev consistently stack the deck against her every chance she gets. What's it to you?

Bev laughed in Yannetti’s face literally 5 seconds prior to Karen smirking. Look at the kettle calling the pot black. It’s a damn circus at this point with all the clowns this court has seen. Why can’t Karen join in?? 🤡

Like small towns in upstate New York

Yes!!!!!❤

Do you watch the trial? They are sworn daily to not do any independent research. Nobody important reads these blogs. It's just a gripe and hype page.

@trevorphifer2368 Hi Trevor - That doesn’t make a whole lot of sense. Allow me to explain. Unless you are stating that neither those who feel Ms Read is Not Guilty paid no more attention to this case, than those who feel she is Guilty, being both are being represented in this chat. In fact, if I were to go along with your reasoning, being there seem to be a much larger group represented here, that feel Ms Read is Not Guilty, it would only stand to reason, to mean a larger portion of those watching, were not paying attention.... Whoopsy ☺️

@@purepoison618 wrong

@@purepoison618 it is SO obvious that this little old lady with gray hair and wearing diapers who was the ONLY one in that group that wasn't MARRIED to a cop and who was about to be dumped by him, drank NINE drinks, got into that Lexus and RAN HIM DOWN. "Hell Hath No Fury like an Old Fart In Diapers who is DRUNK and being rejected by the man she wanted to MARRY to get his money, health insurance and pension, like all the OTHER women in that group". This whole group of cops and their soccer mom wives are a bunch of misfits. But they ALL had financial security because they were MARRIED to cops. NOT KAREN, This was her LAST CHANCE in that club of misfits and she was being dumped . SHE RAN HIM DOWN, Evil old gray haired devil in diapers,

RIP Officer JO

They got it from the judge 😮😅

Maybe there's a person stuck on wanting to know who did it if not Karen....and they don't believe a cover-up would be as easy as it actually was to pull off. The 11 rational people are spending time going over the 5,000 reasons to acquit, and that takes time. Some people are quite irrational and stubborn.

Her vehicle ERT did beyond a reasonable doubt.

One of the Albert brothers testified they had a mean name for JO because he used to yell & throw stuff at his kids for walking on his lawn. I think he was a grump. He was mean to KR.

And they ain’t buying how those injuries got on John’s body either

@@lisalopez8639 Only one dog in the neighborhood that night?

it is SO obvious that this little old lady with gray hair and wearing diapers who was the ONLY one in that group that wasn't MARRIED to a cop and who was about to be dumped by him, drank NINE drinks, got into that Lexus and RAN HIM DOWN. "Hell Hath No Fury like an Old Fart In Diapers who is DRUNK and being rejected by the man she wanted to MARRY to get his money, health insurance and pension, like all the OTHER women in that group". This whole group of cops and their soccer mom wives are a bunch of misfits. But they ALL had financial security because they were MARRIED to cops. NOT KAREN, This was her LAST CHANCE in that club of misfits and she was being dumped . SHE RAN HIM DOWN, Evil old gray haired devil in diapers,

It's totally ok if the jury doesn't "buy the conspiracy." The defense doesn't need an explanation as to _why_ Karen's Not Guilty. The Not Guilty plea alone is all they need to submit. Karen is presumed innocent until proven otherwise. So, if there was no cover-up or conspiracy, she's _still innocent_ until proven guilty. We have factual scientific evidence proving Karen's vehicle never hit John, and that's enough to acquit her - even without a satisfactory alternate theory about who k***ed him.

How do you the jury is buying what the defense is putting down? What makes u feel that 🤔

I feel they were in court to INTIMIDATE the jury. These cops are corrupt, they could make threats on the jury or their families. I would put nothing past them. Just look at their track record…very scary humans.

To be fair, he was drunk when he decided to do that... So far, I'd say his plan worked out pretty friggin' well, don't you agree?

Yes God has the Final say In Jesus name Amen

and getting put on the tow truck showed an intact brake light lol

Are you guys kidding me? Are you looking on a cell phone? It’s obviously broken.

@@reasonable342 stop lying

You guys need to watch it on TV or get different glasses. Her light was broken on the video. As a matter of fact this is not even an argument the defense made. They agreed it was already broken, but said she broke it by hitting his car. To add to that, if you watch the video the day the defense spoke about it, you can see that the lawyer quickly ask them to remove it before the car moves because it was zoomed in. And they didn't want anyone to see that there was obviously no plastic or debris on the snow.

I dont even think Karen was drunk at all..she may have had 4 drinks if that..I have read that also..looks like John was drinking them..they didnt even test her properly..

You said that right. You guys had months of the defense releasing information to a blog and to the media. You did not have all facts. You had exactly what they wanted you to see.

The lunatics who hear factual, credible, sensible, common sense evidence that the car didnt strike a person, and John's injuries werent caused by a car, from the best experts in the nation used by the DOD and hired by the DOJ...and STILL refuse to accept their testimony as true - are serving on juries and putting innocent people in prison ALL over...ALL the time. WHY, then, is this our chosen justice system? Any of us could be imprisoned for something we didn't do because of those jackholes. There are countless accounts of this happening to people who were eventually exonerated upon further investigation. We cannot stand for this. I, for one, don't want these people on my jury if I'm ever falsely accused due to circumstantial evidence or police corruption. I don't want my freedom taken from me because of a few people's blind faith in law enforcement or critique of my facial expressions. Why would anyone decide to put a decision this important in the hands of a jury with NO prerequisite IQ, education, life experience, or open-mindedness? Why wouldn't they have to pass a thorough screening interview, mental health assessment, psychological evaluation, or emotional intelligence screening? It's absurd. KAREN READ IS ALL OF US.

Fxck John's mom and brother - they brought John's k***ers to court with them! How disrespectful to John, how appalling! Paul O'Keefe has been glaring at Karen this entire trial with his devious and vexatious stare. How about being upset at him for that instead of the innocent woman who's spent 2+ years going up against a gang of cops and townies who made her a patsy!

KO? If you’re talking about Officer John O’Keefe’s family (and friends), they are the worst ones! They are like children sitting in those seats smirking, side eyeing, making faces, scoffing etc. Let’s not call one person out but not the others.

All of them were drinking. She wasn’t charged with DUI

That’s what they said yesterday! 😅

Friday

So you're saying a plow wouldn't break any bones? Do you know that a plow weighs 2 or 3 times more than her car? It was clearly testified by even the last defense expert that the damage done to a pedestrian depends on too many things to take account. For instance if John were hit unknowingly he would have gotten full force of the car and therefore have bruises and breaks. But if he saw it coming and began to move out of the way, his momentum would have lessened the impact. It was also very slippery and he was drunk.

@@MyLife-n8xExactly. People here are not able to absorb the fact that the exact contact/interaction is unknown. But clearly there was contact which ultimately led to the injury on the back of his head, etc.

@@reasonable342… most likely he fell backwards down the stairs when dog attacked or he was in a fight and fell backwards. Several experts testified no vehicle contact at all !! No blood on the car … but guess what the didn’t even walk in the house where he was found… I find that outrageous. Interesting.. they rejoined dog immediately and moved to a new home within days… too late to check house .. it has been what 2 years ago.. horrible investigation

Her vehicle recorded her hitting him. She was DUI. She never stopped to see if He was ok. She never once called 911.

@@AnnMcHale … you bumped your head … that did not happen

How did he not sustain any bruising or injuries below the neck? I'll listen if you have a reasonable explanation that 2 MEs and expert biomechanical and mechanical engineers don't.

I honestly believe you, can you explain how you came to this conclusion?

Absolutely.

@@reasonable342 I believe you, mind sharing the information that led you to this conclusion?

Doesn't she not always look furious or 'souer'? l do not know if she has this arrogant expression on her face due to botox but to me she always looks arrogant and narcisstic... of course if she is not guilty or there is reasonable doubt she should not go jail... but still, something seems to be wrong with that woman...

​@@almutstarke1344wow typical society judging someone by their looks, shame on you.

@@joditurrisi6004 No not only by her looks... don't forget her angry voicemails etc... she seems to have a problem with drinking also... l dont mean this in an arrogant way but my impression is that she is a narcisstist and lam not the only one who has that impression...

Most people lack the emotional intelligence and ability to give someone grace in times of trauma or grief. They can't allow for the possibility that people all respond differently in those times, though a response that's different than how they would've responded doesn't mean someone isn't being genuine! It should be common knowledge that people deal with their emotions in unique ways. Some laugh or remain stoic when overwhelmed with sadness because they're in denial, or are afraid to feel the grief. Some people only cry in private. Some people have learned to dissociate from painful feelings. Some people have been through so much pain throughout their lives that they develop a tolerance to grief and no longer respond to it in a typical manner. Some people no longer express grief by crying tears after a certain period of time, because they've sufficiently cried and processed their grief. People on antidepressants may not be able to access the feeling adequately that would result in tears. For all of these reasons and more, it is insensitive, unfair, and inappropriate to judge a person's guilt based on whether or not they cry in this situation, 2 years after the loss of a loved one, while being falsely accused!

Lally blatantly lied in his closing, multiple times. I'm disgusted by him, and loathe him more than Bev, Proctor, Morrissey, or anyone else involved! He has NO conscience, and NO ethics. He's trash.

Eff yeah!

IKR! At first when I saw her and instinctively didn't like her looks and behaviors, I thought maybe I was being unfair and jealous or something. Then after I continued to watch her and hear her, I realized my initial instinct was correct. She is not a nice person.

What evidence… don’t think you watched the testimony

Jen is that you?

Completely agree!

She didn't pay me. I listened to the whole trial. The fbis experts made the most sense

That you Auntie Jen? How ya doing ol snaggle tooth?!

What was your question, sir? It makes as much sense as Trooper Joe Paul's testimony.

Not to mention her parents paid a ton of money for her defense attorneys! Jackson is full of himself, likes to yell and in the end, is looking for more highly-paid defendants that he can manufacture a defense for!

The form given to the jury was confusing. May be that caused the delay. The Defense requested her to give an option to the jury to select 'Not guilty' . Initially she had declined it. But few hours later she changed it. Now it would be easier to come to a decision.

@@shailaja6788 Ya, I saw that fiasco today. It was confusing.

Maybe there's a person stuck on wanting to know who did it if not Karen....and they don't believe a cover-up would be as easy as it actually was to pull off. The 11 rational people are spending time going over the 5,000 reasons to acquit, and that takes time. Some people are quite irrational and stubborn.

Judge has a manicure appointment

One of the jurors had to leave by a certain time ! The judge ok’d it !

Oh the verdict is in already? WOW I can’t believe she got away with murdering a cop. That’s some serious white privilege! Just Wow!!!

They covered up something, hence the destruction of phones and the data in those phones

Also.....got rid of dog and house​@@shailaja6788

I feel shade here, the whole town drinks and drives, they have a bad reputation that will last for years to come

No, that's how red tail lights look when the red plastic is in tact.

it is SO obvious that this little old lady with gray hair and wearing diapers who was the ONLY one in that group that wasn't MARRIED to a cop and who was about to be dumped by him, drank NINE drinks, got into that Lexus and RAN HIM DOWN. "Hell Hath No Fury like an Old Fart In Diapers who is DRUNK and being rejected by the man she wanted to MARRY to get his money, health insurance and pension, like all the OTHER women in that group". This whole group of cops and their soccer mom wives are a bunch of misfits. But they ALL had financial security because they were MARRIED to cops. NOT KAREN, This was her LAST CHANCE in that club of misfits and she was being dumped . SHE RAN HIM DOWN, Evil old gray haired devil in diapers,

AMEN!! 🙏🏼🙏🏼🙏🏼

This case is so stressing .. And that Judge is a Nightmare .. Its like she's Pissed that KR got these 2 very experienced Lawyers Or ots shes Corrupt like everyone else in MA 🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏 pray for tomorrow another day

Well said…what a nightmare.

That is so true. People will slip up and start talking.

😂😂 she doesn’t grieve

Trolls who hate the justice system and think that people should be convicted on feelings and emotions even if there isn't any evidence to back it up.

Bias

That people that thought she was guilty, decided to not entertain nonsense for so many weeks. But wanted to leave their mark today.

It’s the trolls!