Thanks heaps you two for all the info! Got my adv pro setup and riding well! only odd thing id a really high pitch whiniing noise whenever riding and my battery percentage even at fully charged will display 80%. cant see whats causeing it haha

@corevena4664 Battery percentage I really wouldn't trust anyways, I prefer to just reference the voltage on the RT Data screen above that one. But that's likely due to some battery information being input wrong during motor setup, you can check them under Motor CFG -> Additional Info. For the high pitch whine, there's no great way to fully get rid of it, but you can try different Zero Vector Frequency values to see what sounds best. This is under Motor CFG -> FOC -> Advanced. Tony recommends 26kHz, but try different values between 25-30 and see what sounds best when engaged. Can try lower too but it usually makes the whine more noticable, and I'm not sure what the controller is rated for so I probably wouldn't push it much past 30kHz, or at least not above 35kHz if you really want to try a bit higher.

Under general and temperature did you change any value like mosfet temp cut off and cut off start also the accelaration temp decrease

@@Adoptme646 Accel Temp Decrease should be set to 0% to prevent current limiting before Temperature Tiltback kicks in. For the cutoff temps, I personally set both Motor and MOSFET to have Cutoff Start 80°C and Cutoff End 90°C

It can be, but in practice, it hasn’t shown to be necessary with the Hypercore or Superflux.

I can do custom builds and conversions, feel free to email the shop: info@theboardgarage.com

Sensor connector could be disconnected, or the wiring somehow damaged.

Sure, you can send me an email. info@theboardgarage.com

You can reach out to me on my site and we can discuss it.

The data sheets that can be found for any given cell are limited in what they contain, and are meant for engineers who are integrating the cell into a system with defined parameters. There are contexts that most DIY one wheel and PEV hobbyists don’t understand or look for, and so numbers that are talked about in much of this hobby are meaningless. This goes from cell current ratings to MOSFET current ratings. Without actual context, the numbers are not much use. If you set your board to any given current, the likelihood of catastrophe is low, which I think is what you’re asking about. I’m not entirely clear on what you’re asking. I’ve explained in posts on the FB groups and in the Vescify Discord why I set the numbers that I do, and whenever I put more rationale into a video, I get complaints that I’m too long winded and people just want to be told what settings to put where. I’m burned out on going back and forth between explaining things in detail I already have, and limiting explanations in order to be more concise. The answers have already been given in various areas, so I won’t be rehashing it here. As for your last point about “dickwave statistic”, I can’t say anything about the Fungineers VESC, as I haven’t tested one and don’t have one to use to confer with my colleagues on.

@@TheBoardGarage yeah what I was asking I guess is that even if their absolute values aren't safe to plug in, the relative value of say a stock 30T cell in comparison to a p45b or 50S stands to reason that one would be able to get away with a higher max current than with a stock FM battery If spec sheets say continuous 25A vs 35A vs 45A, I'm certainly curious to why they would all be run at 25A max. I appreciate the detail and nuance in the way you write, and whether just being told what to put or having it explained in way that allows me to look at spec sheets of batteries that will be released 5 or 10 years and understand how to seduce safe current levels on any given cell, are both levels of information that I and certainly others would benefit from. It's possible that information is buried somewhere within four years of continuous round the clock conversation that take place fluidly between discord rooms that exist across 4 or 5 discord servers and several traditional bb based forums on top of it. I understand not wanting to repeat yourself every week on a different medium, but what you're offering as a solution is to find a needle in a haystack and without an explanation of what to put or why, people will simply put in whatever they like. In this very thread, people are telling others to double spec sheet amps on all funwheels, and no one reading it will see a reason not to or be given instructions on what they should do instead if they want to be safe. i feel this information should be added to the article that contains every other important setting that is critical to batter safety except for some reason this one, since that already stands as a largely complete repository for such haystack needles and makes sense as a location to send people looking for the *I guess* important information about doubling spec sheet amps. I pointed out that funwheel is telling people to do that, and I asked what the consequences will be. If this is dangerous then you remaining mute on that is either allowing an inevitable catastrophe to happen, or at the very least quite confusing as to wether it's ok to do that. With great power comes great responsibility, and letting the culmination of all of the comment threads on this video be somewhere between silence and a scavenger hunt seems like it would land somewhere between irresponsible and callous indifference to an inevitable across the board funwheel disaster. If it is dangerous as you say, ipso facto you are also saying funwheel is instructing dangerous settings. I understand not wanting to put funwheel on blast and state that explicitly, but there's not middle ground there, and the bush can't be beat around if indeed this is as unequivocally a no-no as I get the impression it is. and I don't call you out out of insolence here, but I look up to you for both your commitment to safety and the information you provide that facilitates a broadly safer community. I have incredible respect and esteem for you, and consider your contributions to this scene every bit as valuable and beneficial as dado and nico's, I probably should just delete this, but I think of all the other people that will ever follow these threads and, like I said, power/ responsibilty. I can't drop it if one more comment might be all it takes for the community to understand implicitly that they need to not to set their current limits as +70A/-70A and what to instead. And selfishly, I want to continue to see you as the role model and personal hero I do and it would be a personal disappointment to have ended this dialog without this comment. I know you don't owe anyone your knowledge or expertise, but you're the only one who has it, and i know it's not your job to save every bigwheel yahoo from going dr strangelove, but you have done a great job at it even if isnt your obligation to do so. And maybe what funwheel is instructing is fine and I'm just ignorant as to why. But I don't want to be fundamentally incorrect about wether or not the 70A doubling of the p42a's 35A continuous discharge spec is dangerous or not. Maybe there is some sort of protective circuit built into FW that makes it safe. If so, I want a similar circuit. Either way, it seems there is a benefit to further elucidation here. Much love And maybe a better way to ask about the 300a esc limit, or even the focers 250A limit would be to say: I don't understand how that much current could be requested without doubling or more on parallel amp dis charge statistics nor do I understand how it could be delivered with 25-45v max current limits. Are the current upper bounds of ESCs realistically attainable in a safe way during real world application, if so, how and for how long?