No

Are they fake vfx artists or real? They don't seem like they know what they talking about, cheers.

Hi I follow you many years (when I wasn't subscribed too) and your work is fantastic ! I know this video at least 1 year old and not too relevant what I would like to ask but I'm curious about your opinion . Whitch version of ruffalo's Hulk is your favorite? (Personaly and professionally both) My forever favorite is "the" Avengers's and the a. of U.'s one (first two appearance) i know there are some differences between these but too small for me, so I take them as one . In my opinion the film makers (not the c.g.creators) made very big mistake when they want make his look more "Mark" (Although the story didn't change his look*) (*because the end of A. Of U. He (Hulk) goes away and in Ragnarök he (hulk) become very different but nothing changed him (in the story))

@@teogaming7515 they’re real? They literally make vfx content themselves.

10:11 - seriously? The best modeling for someone who transforns like that, was in the Ang Lee film. Hulk in that DID look like a more bulky Eric Bana. Do you guys not have eyes?! Have you never seen before and after images of professional body builders?! --> 14:15 I'm really now. How can you not see that that is bulkier Eric Bana?!

Lol you forgot about the broccoli

Lol

@Movie Stone Productions it’s a joke dude

@Movie Stone Productions no it just made you sound clueless

@Movie Stone Productions I read both of them and came to the conclusion that the comment sounded clueless, now I know that you in general are clueless

And also 8:25 I disagree with him because Bruce Banner and hulk are two entirely different people of course hulk shouldn't resemble bruce and that's what I liked about this one it shows the difference between a scientist and a green angry raging monster

@@theraginghouse they’re different people who share the same body so they should look similar even though they act different

@@GeneralTreesap i get but lets say how am i supposed identity bruce banner as the the hulk if he looks very different, its kinda like dr jekyll and hyde which he was based off of

@@theraginghouse he big and green

He has like 2% body fat it’s crazy

Yeah like, I actually kind of like the fact that he doesn’t look like banner, THATS THE POINT. Hulk isn’t just angrier banner, he’s a literal entirely different character sharing the same body.

Ps3 hulk

exactly he had the facial scar and the facial structure that was enough

Ed Norton hulk looks like the dancing baby video. It sucks

@@slivovitz1683 yeah, you should've joined the rendering team to make it look better

I'm glad I'm not crazy, I swear I remember it

@@glowstoneunknown not just remember it, but it abruptly cuts from the previous segment to the last blip about the first hulk section segwaying into the second hulk

@@thefowles1 I was coming here to mention this too. Are they going to address this? Did Marvel or Universal demand that they remove it?

Some copyright bullshit for sure

Nope not just u

THANK YOU.

doesn't mean it's not terrible looking

@@MetalArcade well at least they tried to stay true to the classic hulk lol

Yeah most people know this, but tend to pick on it anyway.

@@chilliinsanity6898 Which proves that this artistic choice was a bad one.

Yep, I like the 2003 Hulk too cos he had so much actions and iconic scenes but the design of the 2008 Hulk was by far the best one

@@thocka5144 2003 looked more photo real

@@wingedhussar1453 Not at all, look how he looks dude. The 2008 was perfect besides that the graphics could have looked better

@@thocka5144 the vg effect artists even said it themselves

Am I the only one that sees a difference between the 2012 hulk to the one in ragnarok 2018. Like he looks worse to me.

ikr

It looks outdated

@@cupocoffee9369 you have to be joking 💀

@@cupocoffee9369 I just know you’re joking

@@darkshat3077 do a little comparison on some modern movie's CGI and compare it to some scenes of 2003 hulk. It had some outstanding cgi for it's time, and it still holds up.

It's almost like he doesn't enjoy watching them. Then why make one? lol

Ever hear that a few top restaurant chefs don’t eat the food they cook much? By the time they’ve filled their life’s work with it, they’re disinterested in their personal life... oversaturated with something. Maybe that’s a motivating factor?

@@games1004 um they’re eating/tasting their food all day long…get out more you seem ignorant.

@@epiccollision Tasting doesn't mean sitting down for a full meal. Also, I said Some, not all or most.

Makes sense to me. I've seen ever fewer movies than Clint, but I love these VFX videos.

Lord Mogatron Gaming I don't understand how people can live in such a bubble like him

Niko: _S K I N P O R E S_

I'll take Wren not remembering the name correctly over Clint not having seen any movies..

You would think that if you made it your life's ambition to work in the world of VFX, that even if you didn't go to a Full Sail-like university, you would school YOURSELF on seminal works in the VFX landscape, even if they're not necessarily your cup of tea. There's really no excuse why someone who works so heavily in the field as Clint would be so far removed from so many landmark films in the VFX industry. It's kind of maddening. Because I know that if I had that interest and I went into a VFX studio's office for a job with such a limited pool of knowledge/reference, I'd likely not get hired. It's like a DP whose never seen or bothered to watch Children of Men or Blade Runner 2049 or a visual director whose never seen What Dreams my Come or If Beale Street Could Talk. And not only has he not seen what feels like %90 of the films they discuss...but he seems actively resistant to the very idea of even taking them in. I don't get it. How did he not only get a job here...but position himself to be in EVERY VFX REACTION VIDEO? Is it a "who you know" thing? I guess some people just live a charmed life...

@@thisisfyne Dawg I was like .4 seconds away from adding it, but he didn't say it in the video. I was expecting it with them talking about the evolution of the Hulks and he didn't deliver.

It's actually because he has jellyfish dna inside of him. That gives him a natural bioluminescence

So he's supposed to be glowing? Either way, it looks weird

@@teneesh3376 I think he is yeah

That OR they went overboard trying to remain comic accurate. Hulk in the 60s, 70s, 80s, & 90s had a more vibrant color palette than the more toned-down, photo realistic superheroes we tend to think about these days (thanks in large part to the MCU)

kzfaq.info/get/bejne/nd-eppSHlb-Xl2w.html

I dont know ehg but they cut the first hulk out

If you rewatch this video you can see that it was cut out

Right, why is this though? They didn't say.

@@TheRogueX I dunno, I'd imagine because the publisher tried to slap them with a claim

@@TheRogueX Copyright claim probably

I honestly don't understand why he wouldn't at least watch them out of professional interest. If he is not that impressed by them as entertainment, that's fine; each to their own. But how is he not interested in the use of visual effects? 🤔😕

and apparently Wukong meets Big-foot the movie... lol

@@Epicurus341 I'm a film student, and I'll never watch the Avenger movies. But you may be right, Clint is a VFX artist and those movies are full of VFX. But they don't have much narrative going so it would be useless for me to watch them...

​@@Albanez39 compared to other action films ive seen, the avengers movies are great. Seems kinda elitist to not even give the Avenger movies a chance. If you try watching them and give up, or if you're financially constrained, thats fine, but saying beforehand that you would never watch them seems like you're doing it for clout or internet points.

@@Albanez39 Careful with your nsoe in the air like that, birds might fly into it. Seriously, you come across as so arrogant and smug, it's absurd. Not much narrative? They've managed to keep the plotline flowing through over a dozen movies. Stop being such an arrogant ass.

No. 4.35 million subs

Yah

Clint needs to see this. Ngl, my respect for him decreased when he refused to watch them. Rip

Gotta get Holden Hardman in on that then as he have a tad experience cutting those movies by now

A full watch a long stream would be epic, so we can see his reaction shot by shot! :D

Agreed! The hardest I ever laughed in high school.

The canadian lad huh 😉

I wonder which other video you learned that from 🤔

@@anxhu959 mee too. canadian lad tho :)

@@davesargent7304 I knew it as well. Maybe don’t be a dingus

@@nashvilletennessee4391 how were they being "a dingus"

Obviously he’s a DC boy.

Supergirl... What an absolute piece of trash. Makes the worst MCU movie look like an Oscar-worthy masterpiece. Clint has seen 10 movies in his life.

@@Siile_ wow toxic much

@@Siile_ Ok, let's not be harsh... ...to Clint. Be as harsh as you want to Supergirl.

@@jacobcenter7374 haha alright, but let's be honest it really seems like he has barely seen anything

The first Hulk was modeled after IFBB Pro Günter Schlierkamp in his prime at the Mr. Olympia from 2002.

Last few hulks: green and retired

That person was Lou Ferrigno.....

He also hadn't even seen Davey Jones in Pirates of the Caribbean either, which is just baffling to me lol. That's some of the best CGI in any film. It's not like PoTC is an obscure movie either.

"High standard" like the end fight of Black Panther?

Marvel's cgi.. high standard? Like rarely.

No wonder he got fired

@@rileyclarke6594 you had to pick the worst one right.

Lol!

I like the think the "fine-essed" was because he was thinking about the fine-assed Black Widow. :D

@@fan-plastictoys5948 weirdo

He really looks like Tom Cruise.

ew, imagine hulk having to use lifts

Why did you all caps tom.

holy shit! it does look like tom. needs more running though

Tom Cruise was almost Iron Man, he never had any tie to the Incredible Hulk production

The one with Toby Magoo against the one with Anthony Garfunkel and one with Thomas Hoffland, as Wren could say.

Damn bots just ruined a perfectly good comment smh

@@pxnk_n_disorderly That's why there's a report button

And thanks to Clint, I can't unsee it.

Haha, broad daylight cg was the scariest idea one can have pre 2008. Still difficult to this day (an understatement(

Exactly, and so I he were subtly giving off radiation, it would change the way the light played on him.

which is why it's still the best representation of the hulk. Plus Bana is a fking beast.

@@PNWAffliction no

For better or worse- I think it was entirely just an "esthetic" choice to make the hulk look like he does in the comics. So many choices were made in this movie to give it a "this is a COMIC MOVIE" feel- and i have little doubt this color choice for the hulk was no different.

YES! THIS!

I agree. I don't get how people can say the Norton Hulk is their favorite Hulk cause it looks so realistic. No--he doesn't! He looks rubbery too, like if gumby were the Hulk

yep: first thing I said was "too much specular"

@@CoreyWE I like that Hulk movie the best of the stuff that's been done with Hulk. I think the Hulk model itself isn't fantastic, but it's serviceable for the story which outshines everything else they've done with the character.

@@CoreyWE Edward Norton's Hulk was the best. Norton planned to take the character in a darker and more interesting direction. I could probably have made the Hulk more interesting than a giant baby gorilla. This Hulk is pure in that it represents anger. No jokes, no mannerisms childish, just pure anger. Another big difference is that this Hulk shows his ability to get stronger the more angry he gets. THE behavior, savagery is how the Hulk should be. Also, I think the 2008 Hulk's appearance fits better. This is, honestly, a of the most underrated comics films. Everything about this Hulk is right. The design, veins and monster appearance. For the first and last time, we see Hulk make his legendary "crush" move. For the first and last time, we see Hulk win a fight and end it with a roar. Man, I really miss the way the MCU made their films back then. A darker and more serious tone added to our dear heroes with a small dose of humor. What I didn't like was the way they handled the Hulk in Marvel movies from Avengers. Hulk has changed, been demoted and nerfed in Marvel films, completely stupid and thrown aside.

Omg you right I just noticed

Totally agree, and it hurts my soul how they made it even worse these days

Ed was better

Wait patiently for world breaker hulk then you will find this hulk back

y’all just have bad taste tbh lol it’s ok people like crap all the time :)

Smarty Baby TV sounds like you're projecting buddy. But you're right it's okay that you like sht things, we're not judging you, taste is only reserved for a few.

I'd watch that.

Honestly though, half of the joy of watching The Avengers was FINALLY seeing Iron Man, Cap, and Thor (from their own individual movies) TOGETHER. Without that build-up, without the end-credit teaser scenes... it takes away half the fun.

5 mil sub special?

@@squireoflink that would be something

I’d like to say that I won’t watch another episode until Clint watches but I’d be lying.

AHAHAHAHA

In a year you can compare those to Spider-Man 2

I think it is going to be their best video as all Spider-Man sequels were praised for their visual effects. It is going to be tough to decide which is best.

I sure hope they do a video reacting to the CGI of the Sam Raimi Original Spider-Man trilogy. I been requesting it since the summer of 2019 but I have not given up on them because yeah their a lot of movies out there. I seen a lot of interesting and shocking stuff since I been watching this channel and also I requested they react to the stunts in the chariot racing scene from the 1959 Ben-Hur movie and they finally react to it last week

They should compare Spider-Man 3 to Spider-Man 2 to Spider-Man 2 since those were the most artistic of each series.

They should wait until Spider-Verse II comes out and add that to the comparisions

Wtf? hard2hurt? Didn't expect to see you here

@@melkt6594 Honestly, I just expected Mike to be lurking around with an alternate account so he could do nerdy shit without people distracting him.

I second that motion

Yes, the fight scene where Red smashes his head in the sink looks painful.

THIS..ENDS..NOWWWWW! Was that too much?

That comment made his opinion irrelevant to me

Y’all sound like butthurt MCU fanboys, he just doesn’t want to watch it, he’s not feeling it. Simple explanation

@@johnsoapmactavish9921 Nope, not butthurt. Not everyone is going to like every style, why would he watch a movie style that he doesn't like? I don't watch horror films but I also don't roll my eyes at people who do. His reaction is typical of these hipster/indie characters who hate on things that are popular because they are popular, not because they don't like it.

@@johnsoapmactavish9921 destroyed😭💀

@@johnsoapmactavish9921 Rekt

It's really weird right?

Apparently it was cut out

Agreed.

yes

Cu

this

yes, i will sub if you do this (On two different accounts).

Ed Norton's Bruce Banner always makes that mistake when he's in Brazil. "You don't want me to get Hungry"

r/dadjokes

I missed that lol

The train derailment was practical, they used a miniature for the outside of the station. The rest is all CGI

@@jemert96 I thought so

You"re making a lot of people feel very old by saying "back in 2011"

I am in love with this movie!

Bruh, the nightmare where he turned into the automaton legit scared me back then.

Nope.

I subscribed to try to make it happen.

waste of time

Would pay for a live stream of that!

Yes please!!

That wasn't funny

Probably to you, it wasn’t To me, it was

@@youngmicrowave127 it was for us

@@jspaceman cool

@@jspaceman he’s right, it wasn’t funny

I don't think any effects company matches ILM. From star wars in 77 to Jurassic Park in 93 to LOTR in 2001 to Hulk in 2003 to Transformers in 2007. These guys are the masters.

@@adistefano_ also, the best Spider-Man. Toby was the best Peter Parker, Andrew was the best Spider-Man, Tom is the best at doing both, but not as good as the other two respectively lol

what an amazing scene

@@adistefano_ They actually made stuntment swing.

@@williamallen7984 Tom and Toby were both good at portraying the Spider-man Andrews Spider-man was kinda bad because of the shitty script Although Andrew did a good job,i don't think Spider-man would become Spider-man only for revenge.And Andrew really wasn't even that nerdy he looked like the cool kid,In the movie he wasn't even the one being bullied by flash.Toby was a good spider-man,Tom was a good Peter Andrew was there

Best Video Idea since "Me at the zoo" from 05

How it's supposed to be lol

Me too@

That movie makes a comeback in your future.

The 2008 one did that too but much more subtly. When Abomination has him pinned against the wall you see Hulk’s eyes flash green and he begins to overpower Abomination when he couldn’t before. He doesn’t necessarily grow but he definitely got more powerful with his anger.

That's how he should be

Do you mean The Incredible Hulk or The Amazing Bulk?

But they did??? Da fuke

@@JPD257 the amazing bulk is something else, its..... A master piece

@@SPX157 yes i meant the "the amazing bulk"

they already talked about the first film i forget which episode tho

I loved when they focused on the feet when they fought that was super tight

He should watch 'The Wtches'. It would be a real horror movie for him.

It's not female feet, dude, wtf are you talking

He only hulks out, if someone insult Scientology.

@@youllseemeallovertheintern3682 that’s my secret Cap, I’m always Xenu

He really did look like some anime character brought to a live-action movie.

I agree! The 2008 Hulk looks the worst imo.

2003 = Accurate, but too green and sad looking mostly. 2008 = The angriest, but poor CG muscles and face. 2012 = More accurate, but Ruffalo's face. Lol

@@madxruler 2003 hulk vs those Hulk Dogs was Fucking Crazy!!!

@@madxruler WHAT?! okay the 2003 and 08 hulk design are thr best mark ruffolos hulk looks like shit lol

@@jordank6546 Hence accurate BUT Ruffalo's face. Lol the CG for the body was great but then it's just Ruffalo's face plastered on.

I was waiting for it. I almost cheered

If only the muscle gets bigger and not the fat I suppose it makes sense

Yeah, he was Olympia stage ready

He was modeled after lee priest

they also made his texture a lot shinier in the first movie

THIS. His skin almost has a tree-like texture as a result.

Yeah

Me.

Me

You commenting this in every creator's channel?

Been watching them since they started back in the rocket jump days

Ya

That's the coolest idea I've ever seen in their comment section, you're awesome

Miquela

i believe they've already done something similar to that, although instead of guests it was just Niko Sam and someone else who i cant remember

I was looking for a comment asking this. Same doubt here.

Yup

it seems like it was edited out on the youtube editor thing. a few comments from a few months ago have time stamps that are longer than the actual video

I wonder what caused that

Good idea for them to react.

Not as good model wise but animation wise, it's incredible. Literally the most realistic dinosaurs ever animated. Perfect mix of weight and natural movement

@@user-mv8ys5og5l All animated frame-by-frame I believe, no keyframe interpolation at all! The behind the scenes documentary talks about how they studied other creatures like elephants to get a rough guess for the locomotion of the land-based dinosaurs, but pretty much had to wing it for the pterosaurs (no pun intended) and the ones in the sea.

Yeah! I just been rewatching parts of it recently, and it is very interesting to see, how much simpler CG was at the time. There are sketchy overlaid shadows, very crude masking and even moments, where parts of dinosaurs clip through each other. But all things considered, it still holds pretty well. The interaction with real-life objects like trees and splashes of water, which were made practically, is particularly incredible. And to think that the whole series with VFX in almost every shot was made on a budget of a TV documentary in an era, where CG was still pretty rare. Just awesome.

That's a GREAT suggestion! And also the Disney movie "Dinosaur" to go alongside it!

This is literally me tho with TV shows

cribbles ' its an art glove specifically when using tablets so your fingers don’t drag on the screen

Hipster and a weeb

Haha the MCU is trash though

Yeah, he's a hipster far to tryhard to be a hipster. If you tell him "don't go that way, you'll die", he'll go that way 100% convinced his special self will not die. And then dies.

Yes, the the Ang Lee Hulk discussion is completely missing.

Copyright probably

Polish Kung fu fighting cow obviously

my moneys on the jolly green giant

Well, seeing as he's essentially an immortal monster, I really don't see how the cow would lose.

@@yassoboi9737 the sweetcorn guy? Definitely

Polish Kung fu fighting cow

Dissapeared

Injured soldier

It's a shame because I love Edward Norton so much. And his Hulk movie sucked so many balls.

@@Taragoola yeah because of him trying to be the director

They are ejecting them from Hummvee-launchers.

What, you've never heard of Turbo-Boost? ;-)

Yes their is a resemblance. Even as a kid when I first watched the movie I noticed that the Hulk looked like Eric Bana.

He’s more Bana inspired than Norton’s Hulk was to Norton himself that’s for sure. Norton’s Hulk looks like an anime

Definetly what I want to write! First Hulk is pretty great cgi, way better than 2