How can you be objective when you clearly have a preconceived bias? Canon CR2 Raw files can be altered with Luminar. The timestamps can be changed too. I know that this video is fake. You are amature visual effects artist, right? Fakery is your thing. Ratings = sponsorship dollars.

How does this comment only have 10 likes 😂

They listened! Woo!

Yes

Sasquatch sightings are too easy, because they’re just bears walking on their back two legs, which put them to around the same height and size of the ‘Sasquatch’

🤣

They were probably wondering what a video from Nevada had to do with anything related to a telescope in Hawaii.

@@danieljensen2626 Its also a comical balloon. So not even under Nasa´s purview, but the FAA´s. They probably looked at the coords and concluded "probably one of those, we will not look into that, we have better things to do."

That “NASA” comment was a red flag for me. People love to throw “NASA” on whatever crackpot thing they have for credibility. “NASA can’t explain…” “NASA confirms…” NASA does have a telescope on Hawaii but it’s certainly not the first Hawaiian telescope anyone would think of; Keck would be that, which has nothing to do with NASA.

Haha yep that's what I was thinking. The guys at NASA were like "Yeah dude who knows" lol

Corridor Disillusion

@@clownmir7796 someone said it lmao

Have I got a channel for you: Captain Disillusion

Mister Explain

@@clownmir7796 As I recall, they literally had him on one of these kinds of episodes. Fun stuff.

if this was posted 11 months ago, it would be top comment :,)

Called It

You definitely an alien

@@TypicalBlox 👽

I was thinking the same thing.

I love heavy sarcasm

🤣🤣🤣

HAHAHA

In low resolution.

Yea bruh low res is must have too, if your camera is stable and high res alien ships adapt to it and cloak themselves, your camera needs to be chaotic and unpredictable

ME TOO

Ever watch Captain Disillusion?

@@jameshall6399 He's literally come on their VFX Artists React show

Me too

@@jameshall6399 Man HUGE missed opportunity to have him helping with this!

And half the world still doesn't believe in science.

@@youneedyourmedication the world we live in

That and internet tech. Google, although shady at times, has the best databases for quick access of information.

that;s how it is supposed to be, but sadly people just believe everything they saw on the internet without doing research like this

@@youneedyourmedication It's because even though the internet and tech has given us the world's information at our finger tips it's also given us the world's misinformation, and as we all know lies spread much faster than the truth. When I was young you actually had to put in effort to look into things like conspiracy theories, now they are accessible to everyone and often served up in bite sized chunks to people's social media feeds.

That was not a balloon

@@Timmeh_The_tyrant it shared most of the same flight path as recorded by the website, the speed was about the same, it was even in the same direction as the way the camera was pointing. Most people didn't even know balloons are out that frequently (3 per day in Nevada) at those heights, with balloons being out there for days moving between cloud altitudes.

@@Timmeh_The_tyrant DId you not watch this video...?

Lol we got the balloon pros in here to verify!

thanks balloon

Name checks out

@@hotdogge-sports6815 They really have nothing to do with balloons actually from the looks of it.

i I bc work 😂 sorry ik😆. Wiki

That area of the desert has "energy".

Funny how ancient aliens wanted to impart knowledge to ancient mankind but left no better historical written or archeological record than ancient mankind could muster.

So no swamps so its not swamp gas =)

@@f1jones544If you leave a cookie with advanced flavoring near a ant hill... it wouldn't last long. Or at best the ants in charge would horde it... for generations even. Denying its existence.

The UFO I saw was sure af not a balloon, ball lightning, or swamp gas. Discounting generations of reports is incredibly unscientific and illogical. But, hey, you get to push your glasses up on your nose and feel smug. Science be praised!

Same, I've watched several moving objects that I've thought were a satellite or a meteorite and it suddenly speeds of in the opposite direction. One time I was lounging back just absent mindedly gazing up and locked my eye on one particular star for about one minute. It literally seemed to behave exactly like a star gently twinkling completely still, then it lost luminosity for a moment and started moving slowly, then shot off out of the southern hemisphere all within 5seconds. I was a bit stunned. Still don't know what that could've been other than some form of technology.

I've seen similar dots many times while camping. They can move extremely fast in every direction. There is no way it's something human made.

@@sh.osmanov6792 Ive seen the same phenomenon a third time more recently but it was clear it wasn’t a satellite when it shot off at 90 degrees to its original vector. And it was clear the helicopter that followed it to this point of change was as confused as I 😂

Air plane

@@sh.osmanov6792 Why not? It's your best bet to label it as human made. We don't know about current military technology and what they are testing. Based on the above I saw something much more spectacular. And still, calling it alien mindlessly is just silly. Don't base your assumptions on whatever wish you may have/ your beliefs. Until you can check something for real the more probable option is still 'human made'.

Pure joy!

@kc myth @kc myth they never said it was deep faked. They said the opposite. You need to re-watch that whole video. They joke about it being faked a couple times, but Nico's exact quote at the conclusion is "I don't think it's deep faked. It could be faked but if it is its a very, very, very, very, very good fakery" You could also simply look at the title of that video : "Andrew garfield Spiderman is real"

They need to look at the book of boba fett

@@bigchaza5039 The Book of Boba Fett is a hoax. I am like 3 episodes into that documentary, and there isn't so much as a JOURNAL entry so far. I doubt he will ever write a book.

sheeeeeesh

Weather balloon

hmm..

@UC5bAwdqya48Gh8F-EYYn9mw Well given how high and far away it is, it’ll probably be moving a few miles, just not particularly fast

@@emeraldbonsai if it was that far away it'd be in space, and people around the world would be able to see it

Apologies, I misunderstood your statement.

Especially in a time where anything, including human likeness, can be easily replicated.

If only everyone thought like this.

🤓

More of this content

The only slight problem is them claiming that you could not edit or fake raw data, which you of course can. Not that it did happen here, but of course one can edit the raw files.

You might want to check out Captain Disillusion. His channel is all about using critical thinking and deduction to dismantle video fakes. He also appeared on an episode of VFX artists react recently as well, in case you have not seen that episode. Cheers.

@@CharlesEastonIV Will do. Thanks for the recommendation.

except they lost all credit when their spiderman take was wrong

Yes this very refreshing content. I love it.

Mythbusters and Captain Disillusion. Already been covered

"V.F.-act or Fiction"?

YES PLZ... Second this.

Please yessss

hell yea

I hope so, in the meantime go check out Captain Disillusion! He has a series similar with tiktok and facebook videos

But, UFOs were officially declared to be real by the Pentagon. Debunking them now is just silliness.

@@TheZorch No it is not silliness, just because the pentagon have disclosed that there are real UFOs does not mean we should assume every video is real. I love the whole subject of UFOs and going down the rabbit-hole just as much as the next guy, but we should still try to figure out what is real and not accept every semi decent video we see.

@@gamesnstuff6944 also UFO just means something that's unidentified. It doesn't mean an alien spaceship. It's like people who fall back on "well it must God who made it" to whatever science can't explain.

@@hazy33 Very true, it might be alien it might not be. Until it goes from UFO to FO we have no idea what it is. Instances like the ones David Fravor talks about are interesting though, I admit I want it to be aliens but until there is proof of aliens that will remain a want and a wish.

wow. 100 years later you still need to watch the people who own the media whos family invented the nonsense they are debunking to tell you yet again that 100% of what their mothers an sisters said on the other channel on the tv their fathers own ; is nonsense. when will you figure out they are all in on it an against the human race?

ok they narrowed it down to that specific location explain that phenomenon happening all over the world simultaneous using the same so called credible research in fact what makes them credible who give them credibility? One thing for sure two things for certain is it's too far away for it to be a plane or to even tell if it's a balloon, and it's a night and the erratic moves and moments are unlike a plane of any sort. putting up still images of air maps and pictures of big ass balloons with crazy institutional names and articulating it to fit your narrative isn't debunking are proving anything just merely preying on the minds of individuals that have not reach the levels of discernment when using their own minds.... believe nothing question everything. ..... we're all living in an unprecedented time of change as change is ever constant. I don't know what it is who really knows i mean do we really live on a spinning globe or on a flat plan .... everything is heightened intensified and sensualized through television and the media so much these days people don't know how to internalize the things that their seeing or feeling most thoughts are not even their own imagine that.

There's already Captain Disillusion if you're looking for that kind of content.

@@B3RyL who isn't corridor crew hence "these guys"

Joe Rogans was the best and he proved everyone's full of shit.

@@B3RyL this more thought through not planned approach makes it way better than captain disillusion imo

@@chikato7106 except Joe went full on science denial over vaccines and became the worst source of misinformation in the US. The problem with Rogan is that he has no background and training in critical thinking and he tends to just accept insane shit without pushback.

That's how a team is supposed to work.

Nah.. It's all for a show.

Seems more like they tought it was a Balloon and then tried to prove it was a Balloon. similar to alien believers trying to confirm their idea there is no actual proof of anything in this video.

a little push the "eureca" moment , more for the show....

Well, thats science.

I bet it’s an insect. No?

It just shows where we're at these days with the internet. Back in the 90's this would have been on Unsolved Mysteries and never solved. Today a handful of nerds can figure out the mystery in a night with their magic phones and a case of Mountain Dew.

They usually create a theory and spend ten minutes debunking their own theory. While being sponsored by Raid Shadow Legends.

@@RobertKreegier It just shows what you can do when you start your analysis from an unbiased position instead of pandering to an audience that low-key wants it to be aliens.

me 2

People using critical thinking is like the most basic thing ever... (I am not talking about the Logan Pauls of this world)..

@@oliveryt7168 You would be disappointed in the majority of the planet's population

More people need good examples of critical thinking ...

chance that aliens exist(or did exist or will exist) is 99.99999% but a chance that they never been anywhere near earth is about the same.

Usually this kind of things are just weather ballons since they are everywhere, specially in this day and age where we need to collect a fuck ton of data for environmental reasons and what not Like the Roswell UFO, not exactly a weather ballon but it was a project by the US goverment to try and spy on the soviet unión nuclear launches using ballons since remember this was a time before spy satelites, the alien shit provided them the perfect cover story to hide a secret project that they were developing to spy on the soviets It's likely that the reason why they don't talk about this stuff is because allowing the people to believe that everything weird that they see on the sky is a alien allows them to hide their very real experimental aircraft like the U-2 or the F-117 which for a while where súper secret experimental aircraft designed to one up the soviets

@@bigpod much like how humanity works if aliens exist and visit earth everyone on it is dead so the fact remains that aliens most likely do exist you just better hope we have intergalactic space travel before we meet any that do

@@brykanst9071 problem is that intergalactic space travel is probably impossible

@@bigpod as far as we know it. Yes. That doesn't mean it isn't possible, no scientist would say we know everything about the laws of physics, or that special and general relativity will never be superseded. My thing is, you have these "ultra advanced, propulsionless" dild- i mean tic tacs, and such but they're able to be picked up on flir and radar? we can make a b2 bomber look like a sparrow with an RCS of like 0.0001. always kinda makes you go ehhhhh that doesn't add up. Especially if they're here clandestinely they'd have to have the ability for logic and reason to be able to achieve spaceflight. So ....that's my issue.

I love those glasses lol

I love to hate those glasses!

PROJECT LOON

@@WarhawkLieutenent project loon! That’s crazy!

Looked like Deus Ex lol

since they're amygdaloid, the light bounces around within and is directed downwards, making them extremely bright under certain conditions

That's exactly what an alien would say if he'd want to keep his existance a secret. Weather baloons... really?

@@flyingfrog7847 I know you are being sarcastic but the fact that you could be serius really tells how crazy people are in this day and age.

exactly. People also forget occam's razor, when you hear hoof beats think horses not zebras. The boys at corridor crew remembered occam's razor. They slowly eliminated all the most common things in the sky until they eventually stumbled upon the answer.

@@claytonberg721 Occam's razor is a principle to live by, seriously, no conspiracy theories would exist if people understood it

It is exactly the diligence and curiosity missing in conspiracy theorists who only claim to be interested in the question but actually just want to talk nonstop about their wacky, unprovable ideas.

And of course the NASA people originally questioned didn't spend more then two minutes before they like "IDK"

@@memento81 Deboonkers are worse, they are too smart for their own good. Unwilling to look at the massive breadth of Government officials and contractors everywhere who are now on board with conspiracy theorists in this debate or our own human history which involves all the weird Sumerian stuff that for some reason is mirrored everywhere geographically.

@@Raichulula I mean, unlike these guys the people at nasa probably figured it wasn't anything in space or interesting and just didn't bother.

@@JamesStakerWin you went like massively off-topic there.

I agree. Its not NASA's job to debunk anything if they don't consider it important enough.

Dude : "NASA, have you checked my video yet ?" NASA : "Yeah we totally did, real mystery your video about hum... The thing... Couldn't figure it out... Sorry we couldn't help more"

THOSE THINGS ARE SO COOL WHY DONT THEY CARE

"hey, do you know what this is?" "no" end of conversation

@@kevinscales ikr

"rad" how american

@@DoubleAAce Yes. People say “rad” in America. Wonderful observation. Where are you from and what is something you say there that us Americans wouldn’t say here?

@@ianhornbeck its such a gay word from the 1980’s also dw about where I’m from.

@@ianhornbeck it’s 2022 “rad” is dead buddy..

Say whatever you want. Words don’t go out of fashion. I’m 25 and most of my friend group will take slang from our parents ironically and eventually it’ll just be a part of our vocabulary including Rad.

This is pretty ground level stuff, there was a time 4chan was engaged in a battle to screw with Shia Labeuf setting up a flag shown on webcam for I forgot what reason. He moved the flag because 4ch kept trolling it, in the end he set it up on a pole, camera pointed to it, only sky and flag visible. Impossible to track, right? Well, people noticed planes. Planes taking always the same route. They started doing some crazy math, found the spot roughly, sent a guy honking on the road to confirm it. It worked and they got it. Should be an internet historian video on it, it's the stuff of legends.

they did 99% more effort than most UFOlogists who just say it's aliens... all videos can be debunked if you do actual work.

@@kruleworld what the fuck is a UFOlogist?

@@imapigeonyoupeasant1489 The people who make up 90% of The History Channel.

@@Galf506 and another time 4chan literally solved a math problem that was previously unsolvable just because they wanna know how fast they can watch their favorite anime the fastest way possible

Like Sam did at the beginning of the video? LOL

@@roybenari9472 How about when they spend the whole rest of the video finding out the right answer? And the alien part clearly wasn't meant to be taken seriously.

@@Gaelic-Spirit oh, I guess there is no irony in the original statement, then... My bad Lmao

@CastleForEyes do u believe now?

I'm not saying it's a balloon, but it's a balloon.

except in this case they weren't weather balloons they were internet balloons, which... is STILL not the weirdest experiment I've ever heard from google.

Well, balloons are dirt cheap (compared to anything else flyable), does not require humans onboard, can be even equipped with solar-powered equipment, they can fly super high and can be equipped with any kind of sensors, cameras or antennas you wish to put on them and can be as big as a bus. The only downside: can't really control the winds so they're not practical for precision flight. Anything else: suuuuuper easy to do.

It’s when you have flying objects of obvious large size that move faster than everything else while also making deliberate turns or maneuvers that demonstrate the object is reacting that you run into situations that balloons are not possibly an explanation… Personally, years ago I was outside just stargazing and saw some “thing” flying high above. It was night time but it had steady red and green lights, but weren’t blinking. At first, I was thinking it was either a helicopter or a drone, but then I realized that if it was a helicopter, from where it appeared to be, it would have been very audible, but I didn’t hear it. So I figured it HAD to be a drone. I watched it hover motionless for nearly 45 minutes and just thought “wtf is this drone owner doing? Did they start flying it and have to step away for something and forget about it?? But then it started ascending. Higher and higher. Not stopping. It was a fairly clear night, so it was obvious it was climbing higher and higher. Eventually it went so high I lost sight of it. What drone owner would do this? Would it’s batteries have lasted long enough for it to maintain a steady altitude for over an hour and still climb up so high that visual is lost? I waited for around 30 minutes and never saw anything in its general area descend or fall, when I would think that a drone would have at that point. No idea what it could have been. Something that hovered motionless almost an hour and then went straight up and never came back down.

@@kidwajagstang it still sounds like something man-made. Red and green lights are standard aviation visual signals for position. I guess it could be some research or testing hover device - ballon or drone. Those 45 minutes of hover could be also for telemetry readings, instrument calibrations, data check, possible issues to debug etc. My guess is they did some readings/checks at nigt - the lights are mandatory since that drone/balloon is still flying in a controlled aerospace (you need flight approval for anything bigger than a commercial drone and capable of flight above 300m, plus you must comply with other extra regulations for these kinds of flights) so this is why you have the visual red/green lights - to make it more safe for other pilots that could end up near it (even if their flight plan is not intended to). Usually they launch balloons during the day, but if you have some kind of experiment at night then it could be required to have the extra lights you don't usually see on them for visual position. Also, if the balloon would climb above controlled aerospace you could turn off the lights to save battery for other instruments, let's say around 15-20.000m above since you're out of risk of colliding with an aircraft or anything else.

nah man, when aliens come to visit, the government release loads of balloons to cover their tracks. wake up sheeple!

Why would they need a separate channel for that? This channel is successful and it's reaching their audience. There's no need to start over with a new channel. Terrible advice.

You need to STOP YELLING at people and telling them WHAT TO DO.

corridor debunk.. CD... captain disillusion.. hmm

nahhh i think thats enough. last time they make another channel called Guillotine Channel, they didnt active there in 2 years now. i think they just stick with Corridor Crew

@@subtractivemusic some times separate channels are used to get separate analytics as if you mix them too much you end up with worse ad revenues and what not... looks better when 70% of the people who visit your channel watch everything then when 2 groups of 40% of your channel watch 2 separate groups of videos on your channel

@@RedButtonTV1 Lmfao

they do it for hype. got bills to pay, mouths to feed

I'm guessing they didn't put much work into determining what it is. Just had a couple people look at the footage once or twice, didn't immediately recognize the flight path and decided to go back to doing actual work. They probably get sent footage like this several times a week and don't have the resources to allocate to this stuff.

especially since ballons probably went to space before NASA (never a straight answer) did.

@@insanebmxthomas Balloons can't get to space, because they don't have any thrust to escape Earth's gravity well. Balloons float upwards because of buoyancy, which requires a medium like water or air, under pressure due to the forces of gravity. All balloons rise through the atmosphere until they reach a point where either: A. The atmospheric pressure around them gets so low, that it no longer counteracts the internal pressure of the balloon's contents pushing out. If the balloon's skin isn't strong enough to contain this internal pressure, the skin will tear and release the balloon's contents (it will "pop"). Most balloons, like party balloons for instance, are not strong enough, and will just rise until they burst. Though some, like weather balloons, are designed to survive at high altitudes, because it's important for them to stay that high up for long periods. In those cases... B. They reach an equilibrium point, where the upward force of buoyancy becomes equal to the downward force of the balloon's own weight. A balloon at that height will not rise or fall, so long as its conditions remain stable. This point can be very high - 173,900 ft appears to be the record altitude, from my reading - but a balloon at that altitude isn't in outer space. It's just floating on the surface of the atmosphere, like a ship floating on the surface of the sea. It can't go any higher, because there's no atmosphere in space. No atmosphere means no buoyancy means no rising motion. The Fédération aéronautique internationale has a term for the boundary of space: the "Kármán line". It's 100 km up, and is defined as the point where aerodynamics stop being useful, and astrodynamics must be used instead to maintain flight. No balloon will ever cross the Kármán line, because they are devices that are fundamentally dependent on aerodynamics to function.

I see these all the time, In Cali, they seem to be fallowing along a narrow path like they are going straight, but they move sporadically... Finally I know I'm not crazy lol

You make it sound like a class science project 😩

Ya. Would be nice if we could get the same courtesy from our gov’t.

I dunno if it's mature of someone just because they accept a rational conclusion. The whole subject screams irrational going back to what's around you is necessary but it's always a topic of conversation because of how irrational it is, like moving at speeds not possible for us. There's so much unknown to us just going by the sheer size of the universe that it's possible that these irrational things could be rational we're just not capable of see'ing it yet cause we are sooooo in the dark.

@@bender1782 I can sympathize with your hopefullness, but these beings have been examined and explained. They are creatures of a different race, from a lower dimension (the zero dimension actually). The ones we see crossing into our universe are part of a system of control, soon coming to earth. They do not come in peace, they are going to take over the minds of human beings with technology beyond our imagination. Basically, they will give every human everything their heart desires. (They will be able to manipulate reality in front of our eyes). Giving humanity everything the heart desires will quickly result in global warfare. The leader of them is coming soon. This is why the government disclosure was made. Because the science behind their existence is becoming evident.

It doesn't take much to convince you. Hey, I have an iceberg for sale, asking $17,500

Sherlock Homeless (sorry, I had to)

not just UFO (what i hope in the future)

You might like Captain Disillusion if you haven't heard of him yet.

holmes or homles?

@@cleanlens woops I'll correct that lol

It will look like a neatly-curving track though, whether that's a regular line or arc or loop or a sigmoid thing or whatever else. This is not that.

Agreed bro

Geosynchronous satellites are parked in really high orbits. I don't think most of them are visible to the naked eye

@@mcarpen89 notice how bright the stars are in the images; they're taken on long exposure.

Satellites were hardly seen after dusk / dawn

Its theory crafting nothing more , its the complete same things the UFO belives does.

@@bobbah676 - Although with a conclusion that can be objectively tested (i.e. contact Google and see if there was a balloon in that position at that time).

@@hagerty1952 But they didnt take 5min and try to contact them, but just claim is as debunked... That's were my issues is.

I couldn’t agree more and yet I say this as a recent convert to believing UFOs are out there. In my opinion the second biggest barrier to us having more information (after the US government) is career nut cases who chase big foot

@@bobbah676 - No argument there. That's actually what I was expecting towards the end.

Area 51 isn't a thing. :P Everything about it and its flights have been debunked.

@@thekaxmax you realize it is a real US Military base....

@@thekaxmax ...

@@thekaxmax There is public history on it. Plus why would they defend nothing?

@@ilasilas3261 I know many have.

Or just a high altitude balloon.

Not just military. The agriculture and construction industries also use high endurance drones (Skyfront comes to mind but there are others too) which use gas hybrid engines for many hour flights. Edit: Global Hawk is also a fixed wing, so it probably wouldn't fly like that. That kind of flight path would probably have to be a multicopter like Skyfront

Drones may have moved significantly quicker than what was captured in the timelapse video

It does illustrate a very important thing to remember: our views of the world are based on our own experiences. The Corridor guys have a lot of experience with working with one type of drone, but didn't think about a different type that they're unfamiliar with. So when we're trying to figure something out, we can't say "I don't know what that is, therefore it's aliens/ghosts/magic/god". You have to stop at "I don't know what that is", and hopefully that prompts you to try to learn more.

@@user-zb3yl1wu8u That's true but to conserve energy and through that extend the time of flight a drone could also just have moved a lot slower. Still I think the balloon is probably the correct answer here.

It has been said that 95% of UFO sightings are explainable and are man-made but 5% fall into the "U" category, which is "unexplainable" and "unidentified" and "unidentifiable".

bruh

Ny yankee CAP no brim

I saw something similar two nights ago near Jupiter. It couldn’t be a baloon.

Baloons don't emit emit any light, so you have a problem with your weather baloon theory. I mean... I'm not saying it was aliens... but it was definitely aliens.

Me too

Yespes kamo xd

Damn you Jeffery!

C'mon, Jeffery!

😂😂😂🤣🤣

This thing is like a dozen miles or more away from the camera. It had flashing lights, they just weren't bright enough to be noticeable by this camera at this distance.

That’s what crooked lawyers specialize in.

You mean vernacular?

@@maysinbell5765 yeah good talks like dem

Then he just Batmans away

Holy hell, this sentence burns my brain...

paid opposition.

@@jumpieva stop being vague, what do you mean?

@@jumpieva an unfalsifiable position is not a rational position. You can't dismiss contrary evidence because it disagrees with your conclusion.

?🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯?

All good points, except I'd guess that the difference in the coma of point sources at 8000 feet, 30000 feet, or infinity would be basically indistinguishable.

COMA?

@@Hut153 look up "coma camera" or "coma light" or anything like that and you'll find out what we're talking about.

*_”Project Loon… What Is Project Loon?”_*

ball~loon

bruh spoilers

I think it's an internet-loon

Don’t worry. I’ll be upset for you.

they probably just dont care, look at it for a minute and said they dont know

PR said "ain't nobody got time for that"

When they say "NASA" couldnt figure it out, it probably just means the dude answering the email wasn't bothered to look more into it

well the guy who filmed it asked some random NASA people working at one site who spent who knows how long actually looking at it

I agree with all the other replies. The NASA budget is pennies compared to the US GDP. They have a lot of important things to do and about ten times as many that are denied funding. I can’t imagine there’s much enthusiasm for the constant questions and harassment they probably get about aliens. Besides, the US military budget is so insanely overfunded that they know it’s nothing serious if the military isn’t already on it with all their top-tier equipment.

Did you just learn what the leindenfrost effect is? the sky isn't a skillet, its three dimensional, any matter entering or leaving the atmosphere at a temperature capable of engaging the effect to a degree where it would perform any actions in the shot would have lit up the sky like the sun was about to slam into the earth

You just described millions of fantasy role playing groups (though of course non-fellows are allowed too).🎲

Don't apologize for the superior unit of measure.

It seems many people also did not stop to think that the time lapse gives the impression that the balloon was moving across the sky and passing across the view when it was just the earth rotating and the stars passing behind the balloon. Love that you did the math.

@@justintime3384 i think most of viewers of this channel are from usa:) If they need to do all the conversions they are welcomed to do so.

It was kinda buggin me so i tried to estimate its speed at various altitudes and arc angles of view and it looks like there is no way it would exceed the wind speed anywhere. If it was flying at jet stream altitudes(8-15km) it would even be terribly slow compared to wind speeds and under it not that terribly slow but still too slow. So i think its pretty save to say that this is above that level. Which points me to the loon again. I just had to make sure this is not bs:)

Right on! Lmao

I didn’t even know if it was real or not but I think it’s probably fake

They have they just wouldn’t care to tell us cause most human are still out of touch with reality

They don’t figure out, because there is nothing to figure out (also they worked with google, so they already knew). Btw, they can detect any object before even entry. Also NASA is only one space agency from ~60.

How do we know the guy actually sent it to NASA?

people have a tendency to pay more attention to the more interesting explanations, even if they're less likely to have taken place

@@Feroce Nothing wrong doing your own research, the problem is people don't know how to research and vet information properly. You can Google yourself into believing anything you want to believe, that is not how science, deductive reasoning, and research works.

How could you ever have even considered it was under any sort of intelligent control? So sad that 90% of the world are now so fckn stupid that these jokers can make themselves look so knowledgeable.

@@jedfra9172 Wishful thinking 😏

@@jedfra9172 They never even said that they thought this was a "real" ufo at any time.

I knew it

no it's people who watched wren's video about how many balloons would be needed to make a house fly

@@jhpk it was right in front of us the whole time.