Maybe they will. 😂😂😂

"No" reports the computer at the insurance company.

honestly, I see this as something that reduces the cost of certain services so maybe.... just maybe that bill doesnt make u pimp out ur family to settle up

Not if healthcare is free to all. Hopefully my country will continue to provide this and yours will provide it soon. It's sad that anyone lives in a country without free healthcare.

😂😂

Thank you, captain obvious, for explaining what the title already suggested.

Its actually more likely to be useful to prevent undereading and satisfaction of search type errors, in the short term at least. Also using AI to do things like bone subtraction to highlight otherwise easily missed masses.

@@wesleyhempoli5548 He did that to be funny Wesley Snipes.

plz, Sir humble request to give me information about AI in medicine. How can I apply? what is the necessary subject. plz, Sir. humble request I am small brother you're... plz sir help me.

1:09 Underexposed CXR which is NOT CLEAR! AI has missed a left apical spiculated mass, AP window consolidation and right paratracheal widening. Hyperinflated lungs suggestive of COPD with basal oligaemia which could represent underexposure, emphysema and/or bullous disease. In summary this could all be CANCER! I hope they got a real radiologist to look again at the CXR!

Won't happen so no need to imagine it.

mollerbt haha dream. anything is possible even it breaks logic

@@w1z4rd9 that's why we use common sense as well. AI can enhance and improve medical care, but it can't replace doctors. Just a fact of common sense and simple logic.

mollerbt why can't it replace doctors ? your reply doesn't make sense against my comment

@@w1z4rd9 if my reply doesn't make sense to you then it's because your not thinking. AI requires computers. Computers require electricity. So what, we are going to lessen our medical perssonnel in favor of AI which can easily be knocked down with a loss of electricity? That's a great weak point for attack. But let's ignore that. Are we going to claim that proper medical care is completely devoid of logic and reasoning? Back to AI. Who will oversee the AI to ensure it doesn't interpret something wrong considering it lacks reasoning? How about the possibility of hacking? A virus? Corrupted code? AI learns by what has already been accomplished. Can AI further progress in medical knowledge of which it has no exposure to? Without the human element, can AI adapt to a previously unknown factor? Can AI properly instruct and care for the needs of patients? The human element is literally a core element of all areas of medical care. There is no human element with a computer. A properly trained radiologist is usually needed to properly position a patient for optimal results. What of a scared child? How would an AI handle that? There are so many other factors that ensure the job security of radiologists. AI can be more accurate with greater consistency sure. But that's about it. The best use of AI is for just that purpose. Not to replace, but to enhance the quality of care given by a radiologist. I didn't even get into the communication and cooperative efforts required of radiologists with other members of the medical care team. Being able to explain things to both patient and medical care team members to ensure the best possible care for the patient and to ensure necessary understanding by the patient

Just a matter of time

After he dropped out I stopped following the election.

James H ...but its still your future isnt it

I don't even vote so it doesn't matter to me.

The likely hood of effecting many jobs, ehhh not really. Won't be happening in our life time or next generation. Still will take some time. Hopefully we won't doom ourselves by then with nukes or natural disasters. Once capitalism starts peaking/modernizing world wide, then we would have to worry cause no one will want to work cheap; thus a new form of socialism will emerge.

Found the anti-vaxxer.

How selfish of these radiologists, wanting a job over saving more lives. Go find something else to do

@@SirEnzo371 huh? Pro vaccines here.

@@SirEnzo371 dafuq you talking?

@Andres Leon eye doctors are super Dumb, I've spent so much on glasses and I still can't see clearly.

Bigtruckseriesreview Motorsports a computer is better at keeping your car going then per say a carburetor that has to be tuned for climate height and other factors, the computer does it all in the fraction of a second by using oxygen sensors and mass air flow sensors

Bigtruckseriesreview Motorsports are you being sarcastic? Because this is the future of free health care. No longer will we have to pay millions upon millions per year for doctors salaries. Just the one time price of the tech.

Dark Craft obviously he is being sarcastic, you must not know who Lieutenant Commander Data is.

Dark Craft softwares will have license

whatdudeokman from Star Trek? I was young but I remember.

Are you saying that Doctors are there just to read x-rays? Here's one for you: Imagine the medecine field stagnating forever.. u___u Forwards, fools... forwards.

ssap io - yeah .... that’s what you read, not what the comment actually says lol.

It is called evolve and get better at your job or get out

@@Dantick09 humans learn much slower than robots. Not saying AI aren't better but it seems a bit counter productive for America to put so much encouragement toward going to college, only to turn to AI in the end. It's still a new field though so I'm optimistic that people will find ways to work around it.

@@Dantick09 The AI recognized pneumonia at a 2% better rate.....and that's PNEUMONIA. A radiologist does more than that and it requires physicals at times like with cancers.

And after 3 years .. what is your advice for GP doctors please ? Should we think of other specialities due to AI future ?

​​@@asmaamohammad2240 As of now Radiology alone seems threatened by AI. Not other branches. Especially surgical branches.

And more is coming our way. Soon well be heading to mexico for more then just illegal plastic surgerys, soon actuall health care will kick in.

*A.I.:* I'm 92% confident it's Lupus *House:* …

And to get replaced!

@@guardian6975 engineers are gping to be replaced, too.

American* doctor: $500 Normal doctor: $0

Are you suggesting there is something wrong with capitalism?

@@janekfan666 ha ha ha, it's funny because in EU any public department of health Care is free instead of the US

@@blaze1206 It's not free. It's called taxes and lower incomes across the board.

@@joshitheyoshi2533 but if broke my arm and need surgery, I'll not have to pay the doctor or do I?

What tool? Pressing that "scan" button? Anybody can do that. All the works is done by the AI.

Siddharth Raj radiologists will be like cashiers wearing lab coats

💯% right Siddharth Raj

@@jasonl3736 😅 No! They have other responsibilities too like research etc

@@zxdp747 radiographic positioning isn't simple and as it takes an element of patient care and consideration of their ability to hold a position, its a little difficult to get a machine to do it. As radiation is used you cant just keep going until you get a good image. Also the tool being referred to is the ability to aid diagnosis, the is no mention of scanning in this video. Clearly you haven't understood it and should perhaps rewatch it.

Yes you can, it will happen eventually. Humans in such roles are inefficient and very error prone. If the doctor didn't sleep well, had a divorce, death in the family -- good luck with your random diagnosis.

1:09 Underexposed CXR which is NOT CLEAR! AI has missed a left apical spiculated mass, AP window consolidation and right paratracheal widening. Hyperinflated lungs suggestive of COPD with basal oligaemia which could represent underexposure, emphysema and/or bullous disease. In summary this could all be CANCER! I hope they got a real radiologist to look again at the CXR!

@@infiltr80r True. But jobs in the IT sector will be lost way before jobs in healthcare.

Yes, but we need 1-2 doctors instead of dozen. That 1-2 doctor will only check AI.

That bothered me so much

BeaterWRX that was cringe tbh

You have a better chance when ai does diagnosis rather than doctor. You have a 2% better chance using ai

Peter Fairclough or bull shit AI to make us even sicker..

What little I could find regarding pricing suggested its currently more expensive, also it currently performs worse than radiologists. Its just not as simple as buying a computer that reads x-rays.

I work with IT in a radiology department. Right now we are in the early days for AI in radiology. At our institution we use an AI algorithm to try to detect pulmonary emboli and intracranial bleeds. If it's not one of those two diagnoses, it doesn't see it. Additionally, it is currently overcalling these diagnoses at an alarming rate. It was so bad, we had to disable the AI for non-radiology clinicians because it was negatively effecting care (e.g. wasting consult time, causing people to be unnecessarily admitted, etc.). Our radiologists have very mixed opinions on it. Some of them seem to like the second eyes while others feel like they need to hedge on things the previously would not have called (and probably shouldn't be called pathology). Most of the money you pay (e.g. $2k for a CT scan) goes to the person who owns the scanner. Very little goes to the radiologist (e.g. $10 for a chest x-ray or $60 for a CT scan). The AI will have to be licensed and it will require even more computing power. Therefore, it is unclear how it will actually effect costs.

@@TheBlackMage3 this is what ive tried to say in about 20 different posts. Mind if I copy and paste this haha. The thought of paying for a ct scan, especially 2k to is terrifying. Rather than hoping ai will reduce costs people should vote for free healthcare!

@@buttonpusher3786 Yes, feel free to copy and paste. There is a lot of baseless hype around AI. I have no doubt that it will have uses throughout the economy, but I wish the news would stop scaring people needlessly. We definitely need to find a way to pay the hard working techs, nurses, doctors, etc. who actually take care of people and pay less to the hospitals/administrators. When I went to the ER after chopping off the tip of my finger, my bill was almost $1.5k. Only $100 went to the doctor who fixed my finger. The rest went to the hospital for having me sit in their ER for 8 hours while waiting to see the doctor. I literally got no tests or images. This is the reverse of the way it should work.

That's exactly my point. If we don't need a certain job, it's because we are passed that. Two people I know died because the docs didn't read the X-ray properly. AI checks can help so much!

Think of all those poor horses that lost their jobs to cars. Millions of horses out of a job! Poor little horses. Same with humans. Get on with the program or begone. Progress is relentless and everyone should educate themselves on AI instead of blindly walking towards a certain future with no foresight. AI is coming and it's coming fast. It's going to replace us at everything. But not in a short period of time. It's going to be a generational thing. Our kid's grand kids won't even know what a job is.

Its not like cancer will magically disappear anytime soon.. Only way of avoiding it is by becoming a robot much later in the future. Cancer will always be there, in our lifetimes and future generations.

Note Pen the cure for cancer is out there. You think in today’s world with all this technology and so on, that they don’t know? We are smarter than this. At some point you gotta wake up and realize that we are always being lied to. Some things they don’t want us to cure because that’s less money for them if there are no patients for these things.

@@Lo2smoove Out there? Where? You do realize cancer is a family of diseases for which no one treatment or drug or solution can ever be devised. Ever. Google "why haven't we cured cancer yet"

No No hey I tried hard! Lol it just wasn’t for me... or I wasn’t for it. 🤦🏻‍♀️😅

On the brighter side, the new technology might significantly reduce costs. Health Care in the USA is crazy expensive.

@@Jaclyn_Zen lol nah if any thing the health would get more expensive due to the cost of the machinery that would need funding.

This is regarding radiologists reading images not taking x-rays. Machines taking X-rays is likely a much longer way off. However if you wouldn't have enjoyed it, it was a smart move. Hopefully you found something you enjoy!

Do computer science

Only for that they are required just to oversee

that is the ultimate motivator...

Of course, you complete idiot. By your logic, we should just keep jobs for the sake of people having a job. Why weight beans in a store, hire people to count beans individually! More jobs for everyone! Less people eventually means cheaper services.

Doesn’t matter ,they are cost effective

Wtf is is your id pic?

Probably wouldn't have made it anyways.

@@SirEnzo371 You're probably right because it's something you need a passion for or it's going to really suck. I hope you found something you really enjoy as your profession.

@@buttonpusher3786 No, mostly becoming a doctor is extremely difficult yet alone becoming a radiologist which is one of the more competitive specialties in the US.

Lol you can't even get into medical school, talking about Radiology shhh

John Nickel well he’s no longer running, so ....

@@imhuemankeepURcolorsforcrayons The problem still exists so his points are still relevant even if he dropped out

uknowimeyen ya but he’s not 2020 anymore, that is what I meant!

I think I Got This! hmm, he’s still 2020 on instagram ahaha

Roland what does that mean, absolutely nothing. He is no longer running 2020, he will not be on any ballot.

The A.I. agent is put in a feedback system where it gives an estimate based on data it has received. You give the system pictures of "dog" for its "bank" then offer it pictures with no classification to see if it can estimate if there's a "dog" in the that input. The feedback system then corrects the result and the agent trains itself this way until it gets within acceptable estimates for most pictures of "dog", and then you have a billion mini-issues that require tweaking and optimizing where the algorithm is detecting a Lynx as a "dog" or not recognizing "Pugs". It's not perfect by any means which is why this video is a clickbait title.

@@DuckieMcduck yeah, computer aided diagnosis isn't a new thing nor is it currently good enough to be used. It would still be interesting without a clickbait title which is why its so annoying. Also, great explanation!

Doctors these days can't diagnose their own rear ends correctly.

But what if the AI determines you're slightly overweight, and decides that the best course of action is to fat shame you

@@ChristianNorge Even better.

Whatever your symptoms dr google says cancer! Oh well, you had a good life.

Dave Davidson exactly lol

Our future AI overlords will not be pleased with your comment

extremeblue psyche unless computer engineers decides that there is a problem with their robot

more free time? obviously, under our current economic system this will lead to mass unemployment. but economic systems can be changed

@Andres Leon "people in asia make nothing compared to americans" this is completely nonsense lol

You are clearly not a great thinker.

The Original Gamer honestly this video proves none of us are

Peanuts ThatTasteLikeDepression so you’re a depressed peanut

Drake Santiago what r u on who cares if groups unite, if ai is more efficient than a human that job doesn’t need to exist, there’s no “equitable society” where people can choose how a business works when they have no leverage

It's a similar situation in medical imaging. AI may be useful for highlighting potential abnormalities and reducing human error but there's a reason it takes a long time to learn how to interpret images. It's not simple and there are so many other factors. You've just made me wonder how accurate those auto defibrillators are that are in some stores and public spaces!

@@buttonpusher3786 auto-defibrillators are much simpler, their job is to detect a shockable or non-shockable rythm so accuracy is much compared to an ECG interpretation. But inaccuracies are still a possibility.

You're really comparing the 20 year old tech to what's available now? There's also no such thing as an "artificial algorithm" which means you don't know what you're talking about. Did you miss the part where the ML model was 81% while doctors were at 79%? That is proof, your opinion is irrelevant.

@@buttonpusher3786 You don't understand machine learning or "AI" as they call it here. It's perfect for learning how to interpret images through training. Also, it will only improve unlike a human who gets worse as we get too old, lose eyesight etc.

@@infiltr80r 1- I'm not comparing old to new technology, all these ECG-reading are updates on regular bases. And the ones i'm referring to where up to date. 2- Artificial algorithm, I mean programmed ones. 3- When you compare some statistics out there for ML vs doctors diagnoses, they compare very specific thing that's irrelevant in a general context. 4- What I provided wasn't an opinion, it was a daily practice in Cardiology clinics and in-patients.

This is likely where we are headed and although AI isn't good enough yet it is getting better. Radiologists are great but they're overworked and there are only so many of them. Human error rates in radiology remain constant and ai or techniques like bone subtraction may aid in reducing those errors in the future.

And all along it was the software developers replacing themselves. Except the top %5

​@@user-221inot really

Hospitals in remote areas can send images to be diagnosed to anywhere in the world via the internet. Although that's very expensive, currently so is using A.I.

That’s not... No that’s nowhere near true.... pretty much everything you said here was false. The guy made that statement based off the false and common assumption that autopilot flies the plane and not the pilots. That’s not how the autopilot on a plane works. Also without a pilot planes would crash far more often than they do today. The drones are lost at an average rate of 2 per month. Which is far higher than any commercial airliner.

Healthcare seems perfectly affordable in many parts of the world, especially outside of the US. Skipping the part where a radiologist glances at your x-ray for 45 seconds isnt going to reduce the cost a whole lot. You still need a bed, a nurse, doctors, radiographers, physios etc. Free healthcare for all paid for by taxes is what people need.

@@buttonpusher3786 Sadly I live in California :( and this could set precedence for other fields not just radiology. Less misdiagnoses could lead to a speedier recovery without the need for further useless tests and drugs.

@@09SmashingPumpkins at least you have way nicer weather than me in the uk XD. Im not sure it's that simple, but I don't know as my experience outside of radiology is limited. AI certainly has future potential.

Apart from the fact it's more expensive and worse than radiologists at just about everything. So it's great news for people 50 years in the future in countries with free healthcare, potentially.

@@buttonpusher3786 More expensive? It's a piece of code, effectively free. The images are digital anyway. You need to learn to listen. The ML beat radiologists in tests. So your opinion of it being "worse" means nothing.

And computer algorythms not? Do you know what an algorythm is?

For spotting cancer it's closer to a coin toss.

@@abram730 You know we have the internet and can just check 'facts' you come out with right.

@@buttonpusher3786 I know. The internet was made for that. IT was going to lift the human race up.. but social media, so not. Cure for coronavirus also cures cancer by turning on apoptosis for cancer cells.

Because its going to take a while for them to take the jobs. Also, with most jobs taken by computers, good luck competing with people with degrees for the few jobs left.

That's not how it works, they have given their algorithm the data of patients without pneumonia and they have compared it with patients that have pneumonia. So from comparison the algorithm can figure out which patient has pneumonia and which doesn't.

At that point they will have way bigger problems like all the patients on life support. Not to mention that the xray machine would not work either so the radiologist can't even do their job neither. BTW hospitals have backup generators.

Without power doctors can't make the diagnosis either...

Yea because hospitals don't have backup generators... Not to mention a radiologist can't work without power either. They require power to take the scans that they read. They use power to have computers to look at scans. Power is a moot point.