A

@@warscreamon A

A!

A

A

Yeah but it still looks cool

Totally agree, that's what I hate of that fckn st**id serie "Vikings", they romanticized a lot viking life and their characters were a lot like "uuuhhh look, we are the bad cool guys", so boring. Also I loved the serie "Hernan" about Hernán Cortés and the Conquesto of Mesoamerica, they portrait the mexicas without romanticized and the tlaxcaltecans as humans who were tired of Tenochtitlan using them in the worst ways.

ac valhalla be like: viking life is about making alliances and friendship 🐣

@@alfredomonter7568 vikings is told from the viking sagas as they are written nobody romanticized them you sound dumb why don’t you actually read the sagas and educate yourself on icelandic poetry before you open your mouth slandering a whole body of work

It shows the brutality, yes. The reality, tho? Lol

Это же сказка индийское кино. Здесь показаны руссы 🇷🇺 на порядок выше в развитие военного дела чем эти шайки разбойников болливуд отдыхает 🤣🤣🤣🤣

@@user-mh1sd9bq9p Sorry, I have not had nearly enough Vodka or radiation exposure to understand what you are saying. : )

@@MrJustonemorevoice потому что ты алкаш 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣💯

They were also coming down from being high off of henbane and booz.

They’re no berserker though. Someone(edit: autocorrection said Simone) posted under a different video a different name for them, can’t recall it, but it’s something with wolf 😄 in case you’re interested

Thank you for commenting and please subscribe if you have not so, it really means so much to us to see your support!

There are no heroes, nor villains in this story perhaps. It's the true essence of life. Almost everything is grey.

@@warscreamon To be honest I would say almost everyone in this film is a a**hole. It just so happens that Amleth was the a**hole who’s story we were following 😂

@@somanytakennames Hahahaha. Welcome to the Medieval World's Vikings :D

I think the story was trying to tell that Amleth is going down the wrong path at this point. The Seerer calls him a beast and how he fled from his fate. And it's through fulfilling his promise and following the gods that he finds redemption and acceptance into Valhalla.

Basically a reflection of what happened to amleth as a child.

I think that kid was Olga's brother or something. You can see her with the bread trying to stab the guy with the knife.

@@TESkyrimizer that was the child of the woman she was soothing on the boat I believe. That woman looked the same age as Olga so I don’t think it was her brother.

This is a reference to the film "come and see"

@@TESkyrimizer Never realized olga was even in this whole scene

Well that what they did they weren't all fighters and raiders

Last time it made sense was probably when the nazis were simping for them. They got far too close with that whole philosophy of "don't conquer/integrate - enslave/kill"

This movie is absurdly unrealistic too, portraying vikings in the most stereotypical way as cool dudes who beat their opponents with one axe swing, even when the enemy is fully armed and you are naked.

@Wanderer628 Wtf are you talking about? Have you watched the shows you’re mentioning?? They (vikings) are literally butchering villagers and unarmed church-goers in ‘Vikings’. The vikings don’t come off all to well in The Last Kingdom either, despite yes, there’s some ‘good guy’ vikings as well. You’d really have to cherry-pick scenes to the extreme to say Vikings and Last Kingdom portray vikings as ‘hipsters’. Perhaps the problem is you’re confused what a ‘hipster’ is?!?

@@Rottensparrow it’s not unrealistic it all, it’s the closest movie to this day to portray what the Viking age was actually like, and we have many sources pointing to the ulfhednar for example, however they weren’t shirtless, they were completely naked😂

Thousand yard

Why did they burn perfectly good slaves?

@@bobbobson6290 _thralls_ ⛓⛓

I love how impressionable soy judges history based on a fcking hollywood movie

It wasn't uncivilized for vikings. There's no objective standard for being civilized, one could argue. RPing animals was probably more sophisticated than normal fighting for the vikings. Thank God they got christianized eventually

@@antonikudlicki1100 You mean thank your “merciful” lord that during the 500 year dark age period you slaughtered the entirety of Europe and it took you 500 years to forcefully convert Europe? You act as if it was a choice, it was brainwashing or slaughter, nothing else, you Christian’s ruined Europe with your Jewish religion, Europa will never be Christian, Europa will always be pagan in its heart🙏🏻🌲⚡️⚡️

@@antonikudlicki1100 Makes me want to burn a church. The same churches that were quite literally built on top of ancient Norse worship grounds, after they were destroyed. The pendulum always swings back.

The norsemen were actually pretty civilized,they had a love for poetry,deep respect for tradition,had pretty good bodyhygiene,etc.,they were very brutal while raiding because if word got out that they,idk,made all the villagers of a village go into a house and burned it down if them in it,people would be less likely to try and fight them,and just pay them the so called ,,danegeld",which pretty much means,,money you give to vikings so that they go away"

after literally eating a man's flesh and howling like a wolf too lmao

People that are based

no he’s a villain it doesn’t matter what happened to him the war crimes he participated in does not put him in the grey area

@@ipisseduoff5900 Exactly. Not all people in that time were cold blooded killers. So they were villains.

You think Vikings only did those things in Europe?

yeah beacuse the christians in central europe were known for their civilised behaviour and honorable military conduct rofl, mass rapes were equally as common in a siege done by christians as they would have by asatru warriors

Fairytale

Они руссов боялись и не ходили на русь. Тут реки пороги давно всех перебили. Англия другое дело. Даже венды славяне ходили

Yeah, as badass as this scene is, it definitely shouldn't be taken as realistic. Fortifications, even those comparatively simple ones of wood and earth, were used so widely around the world for good reason: They were damned effective at preventing attacks just like this one.

@@DavidEllis94 здраствуйте привет с камчатки 🏔🗻⛰️🇷🇺 вы же в курсе викинги не когда на русь не ходили. Тут реки а их корабли только для морей. И военном искустве русы были сильней. Сами славяне балтики скандинавию грабили а новгородцы до 16 века урмань норвегию грабили и упсасу столицу шведов сожгли. Это голивудская сказка. Индийское кино. Почему негров и геев нет. Страно.😂😂😂😂 Воры наркоманы не войны а внезапные грабители

@@DavidEllis94 вы образованный человек откуда вы? Сша или великобритания?

What an eye 👀 you have dude!!! .... I did not notice that Olga was in this scene. Olga was one of the best caracter in this movie, she deserves her own solo movie.

@@UNCOOLBRUNNOonly recognised her by her hair

I wanna be the dude who got his shield broken them kicked. Time for quiet escape!

and she's the one who pretended to offering a bread and then trying to stab a viking, before a kid run away

Probably cooled him off lol

Yep, i think it was a reference to a scene that plays out exactly the same in one of the sagas

@@unavela Show us that Saga.

@angieroxy7550 Njal’s Saga (Brennu-Njáls Saga). But the whole “throwing back what was shot/thrown at you” was not uncommon in sagas. Whether it be arrows, stones or spears. It was a way of showing the character’s superiority and perhaps also contempt for the opponent. The point being of course, that when the item was thrown/shot back this time it hit or killed.

Sagas are fantasy.

@@bdleo300Far from neceissarily or a criteria for the designation, lmao.

Exactly haha. Slicked back hair, horns helmets and shit in most shows. This is accurate and even more terrifying.

For sure! Haha, they always look more like hipsters then people living in the dark ages with limited hygiene routines lol

@@davetrohl9491 And even their chainmail armor with the weird helmet surrounding the eye socket look terrifying. They were another deal these guys.

@@davetrohl9491 vikings were not city dwellers and lived near the water. They most likely bathed regularly.

@@bardgold4553 Theres actually a very interesting piece of historical documentation that's basically a bunch of complaints from englishmen about viking settlers stealing their women away because they washed regularily and used rudimentary hair products haha

Thank you for commenting and please subscribe if you have not so, it really means so much to us to see your support!

When I watched this in the theatre, a handful of people got up and walked out when the fire was lit. Mostly middle-aged and older. I don't think the older generations are all that use to realistic depictions of historic barbarism.

@@jaysoniorg2950 imagine how brutal it must've been in real life to witness a viking raid and berserkers/ulfhednar (these guys are ulfhednar - wolf warriors) setting loose the beast within upon the hapless victims of the village they targeted

@@warbossgrotsmasha23 yeah, it would have been traumatizing just to witness nevermind experiencing.

@@jaysoniorg2950 what really got me in this scene wasn't really the aftermath where they rounded up the survivors to be sold off at the slave markets from the middle east or taken home as thralls but the fact that they gathered most of the children and locked them up in a house which they set on fire...damn that was dark and cruel, i guess in a way it made perfect sense to kill them because they would've grown up and taken up arms in revenge for what the raiders did to the village or the fact that them being kids wouldn't have survived the journey to the slave markets

No, it was totally unrealistic.

@@Valorius Not entirely. and for a film being essentially an adaptation it fits very much into the culture of a Norse Saga.

@@Valorius Although very challenging, it's possible with a javelin. An arrow would not be possible, hence why we see Amleth dodging them without even trying to catch them.

​@@Valorius ancient human beings were much more agile than we. A viking warrior, could most definitely catch a stick in the air..

@@palestine7296 I mean if we just think about it, a baseball player can catch a way way way faster and tinier ball in a faction of second so why not a long ass spear?

Shoulda been the winners.

@@gammadion they often were. Rus did a bunch of raiding and saving themselves

@@grizzlyblackpowder1960 But the people they raided weren't Rus. The Rus were Swedish vikings who carved out a kingdom in eastern europe for themselves and had slavic subjects. Their slavic subjects would only adopt the name Rus long after Viking raids stopped being prevalent.

ᛏᛁᛚ:ᚹᚨᛚᚺᚨᛚ TIL:WALHAL "To the Slain-Hall!"

I would ask what honour there was in attacking a weak settlement that had no chance of winning.

@@the36lessons11 Can you point to scandinavia on a map or are you just a norse larper?

@@meisrerbootNorway, Denmark, and Sweden, east of England and west of Russia

@@Paleo_P1anet Because scandinavians settled there. Still scandinavans

Robert Eggers' perfection.

I mean cuts are usually used to make a big-scale action set piece easier to execute. The long takes in this scene are incredibly done and I imagine an absolute nightmare to plan and execute

Long takes like this reminds me of asian martial arts cinema. Not easy to execute, i guess, but make action so much easier to follow and get immersed into what is happening.

@@Endru85x absolutely! also think that recordings like this are much better for our attention spans than these chopped up (but easier to film) shots.

They're just a bunch of edgy teens.

Those people never get involved in a fight risking their lives, It's not funny

Shut up you corn syrup guzzling fool. Violence isn't bad.

Yeah anybody who actually has an interest in the world back then can safely say you wouldn’t want to do any of this stuff. Only the shitty edgy dweebs who wouldn’t even know how to swing a sword right would say that. The world was too brutal for any of us in the modern age.

​@@weedwizard7906Ok, eunuch

Conan the Destroyer was campy fun, the reboot was sadly very forgettable, but Conan the Barbarian is one of the best page-to-screen adaptations of all time.

@@shakedown4769 Then you've definitely never read the Conan stories.

Not all of them, no. Just everything written by Howard or L. Sprague de Camp and a little bit of the 60's Lin Carter stuff, with imagery informed by Frazetta and some of the later Weird Tales illustrators. But don't let me stop you when you're hot on the trail of a No True Scotsman.

@@shakedown4769 It's not a case of No True Scotsman. I was discussing Robert E. Howard alone, the guy who actually created Conan and the world he was set in. The rest are pastiches, so they're not relevant. If I were talking about Tolkien and LOTR, the discussion would not be about the pastiches, either. But don't let me stop you from lazily resorting to ad hominem attacks. I guess.

@Ravens that Fly with the Nightmare Eyes oh it wasn't ad hominem, I actually thought you were making the silly case that someone who had read the "Conan stories" from "Robert E. Howard's Hyborian lore" couldn't believe that Conan the Barbarian was a faithful adaptation of the tone and setting of the original works, so I was attacking that argument. Glad to see that wasn't the case, though, and we can see that I've satisfied 100% of your requirements for having read Howard's original work. So I guess we just disagree about how good an adaptation the movie is, and you can clearly see that your original reply was definitely what set the tone here. But you have inspired me to go back and re-read through some of the anthologies about Venarium. I don't remember it described in any great detail by Howard, just in passing, and it seems to really have just been a setting picked up by 21st century authors (which you weren't talking about). Was there a story or novella in particular you were thinking of?

Agreed.

@@Lemnock you replied as if the uploader was going to do something for you with that response

@@Lemnock you cared enough to reply back.

@@Lemnock L

@@Lemnock you cared enough to comment in the first place. It actually seems like you care a great deal.

Это же индийское кино сказка

@@user-mh1sd9bq9p Western hate on Slavic people presented by sick Hollywood

Lol

@@el34glo59 💯🇷🇺

It’s certificated Hollywood bullshit

excellent

Loved the experience and well done for the lad.

Should consider watching “Come and See”

@@kalikartoonz7656 Same thought, it's hard not to think about the scene with the burning barn

bless odin

in bannerlord the militia stay to fight but the villagers probably flee into the woods or something so in my head canon i can raid and still not be a war criminal right

@@TESkyrimizer same lol, i zry to tell myself that all the peasants fled and the militia stayed back willingly

@@kastriotkrasniqi7118 you right but tbh the militia are still just armed villagers but i need that butter fam

@@TESkyrimizer yeah that's what a lot of rural villagers did in order to survive, after timur pillaged georgia the population hid in the caves and when they returned the villages were renamed because they couldn't remember the original names (timur was a crook)

Me doing my essays on paper while everyone else used computers: "bloody savages"

"If we cannot produce Launcelots, humanity falls into two sections-those who can deal in blood and iron but cannot be “meek in hall”, and those who are “meek in hall” but useless in battle. When this dissociation of the two halves of Launcelot occurs, history becomes a horribly simple affair. The ancient history of the Near East is like that. Hardy barbarians swarm down from their highlands and obliterate a civilization. Then they become civilized themselves and go soft. Then a new wave of barbarians comes down and obliterates them. Then the cycle begins over again. Modern machinery will not change this cycle; it will only enable the same thing to happen on a larger scale. Indeed, nothing much else can ever happen if the “stern” and the “meek” fall into two mutually exclusive classes. And never forget that this is their natural condition. The man who combines both characters-the knight-is a work not of nature but of art; of that art which has human beings, instead of canvas or marble, for its medium." CS Lewis

@@Atreus21 Good addition.

You completely missed the mark because you're using apologist language and saying words that, because they're empathetic, must be true. Comparatively more advanced? Both untrue literally and an ignorant assumption. That perspective is warped from the modern day slop of mass produced, emotionally driven information, no offense to you personally. Reconsider that CS Lewis quote because it is not even remotely justifying weakness or pacifism. The Celts, Vikings and Spartans for example were aristocrats of the mind and body, not feeble-minded idiots that saw good and evil.

That's one way to commit atrocities. Dehumanise the enemy

Instead you got invincible enemies who won't die from 10 arrows to the face because they're higher level than you

@@SpookyRumi lol but you can knock their defense down by shooting their toes for some stupid reason.

Yeah that game bugged me. Good guy vikings and bad guy Saxons, didnt even let you kill monks.

AC Valhalla doesn’t deserve to be called a Viking game

i mean much like the romans the vikings functionally had a slave empire, and traded slaves all over the world. same with mongols. they looted metals and raw materials forsure, but forced labor was something they sold to many clients, including the islamic empires in north africa they made contact with. vikings even worked for some caliphs as mercenaries and slavers

@@sicklecuthammerfall the Mongols hd a method called "measuring against the lynchpin", where they measure a child against a carriage's lynchpin. If they were find taller than the lynchpin, they were decapitated. The Romans had the practice of decimation, where the tenth man in a herded group is slaughtered.

@@oshikiri.nikko-desu02 decimation was literally never used but a few times. It had to do with mutiny in the legion. You don’t know your history especially with a Ching Ching pao username like that

@@oshikiri.nikko-desu02 Decimation was mostly done for legions that had suffered shameful losses / or showed cowardice, and even then it was a last resort. Slaves weren't killed unless they fucked up a lot, since they were the workforce of the Roman Republic and later the Empire.

@@oshikiri.nikko-desu02 decimation was a penalty for a legion that had dishonored itself in battle, whereupon every 10th man was killed.

“The line between good and evil runs not through states, nor between classes, nor between political parties either - but right through every human heart.” -Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn

@@LanceRulau it certainly can also run between parties and classes

It's entertainment and that's all.

You find child murder to be entertainment?@@mattd6200

@@mattd6200 It's reality, the reality of this planet, it is still happening as we type.

Indeed it is. Be sure to share and subscribe for more content. :)

Wait, wut? I dont get it 🥲 Pls elaborate

@@Porkschnitzle666 the barn burning is a reference to come and see along with him staring right into the camera

Yeah i just recalled that between askin you and you responding😆, anyway, thanks for responding

OH SHIT that's awesome! You just gave me another reason to love this movie lol.

Scandinavians don't fuck around. At least not back then

Realistically you would just slaughter them easily if the town is decently fortified and armored. Modern people really underestimate how effective armor was back then you know

@@Eumanel12 And that village clearly _wasn't_ effectively fortified. Walls mean little without stout men to man them--and that village was lacking in well-trained and motivated soldiers. Also, armour does not make a man invincible on the battlefield. It didn't back in the Dark Ages, nor does it today. What armour has always done is potentially turn what would have been a potentially fatal wound into a non-lethal one. However, for as long as men have worn armour into battle, they have also produced weapons capable of defeating said armour... and it is always cheaper and easier to make a weapon that will pierce armour than to produce armour that will provide effective protection against all common threats on the battlefield. Weapons surged ahead in the weapons vs. armour race so far that by the late 17th century, personal armour pretty much had disappeared from the battlefield and wouldn't make a decisive comeback for nearly three centuries.

@@Schwarzvogel1 you could argue the village is badly fortified but this only is for the sake of the movie. In real life it wouldn't be like that. Even then, the defenders were at an undeniable advantage. Obviously armor doesn't make a man invincible, but *it was* a decisive advantage in medieval combat. An armored warrior fighting one unarmored is going to win like 99% of the time. The effective weapons used against armor weren't swords or spears but warhammers because they would smash them

And the christianity came along and show them what real torture was

to be fair in reality it was never really all that much like this, it was brutal but the vikings were as good as fighter as anyone else. raids frequently failed and they frequently got rekt by angry villagers who they underestimated. this is based off of mythology though so the dude really should be able to scale walls naked because his ass is Mythical.

Kid named tower monestary:

Yeah, the Vikings usually lost against standing armies, which they avoided.​@@Sgt.chickens

A Predator tearing through an army of vikings would be glorious

It’s a Predator learning to survive these mfs

Same with Fuedal Japan or Samoa. We'd have final battle with a wounded predator and the warrior would challenge it to a duel. Either he kills the Predator, or the Predator collects his skull, in respect of a brave warrior.

You should checkout the fanfilm predator darkage. Predator vs knights Templar.

The movie Outlander would be pretty close

He probably ate the wrong mushrooms :D

Agreed.

I watched it once and saw how ridiculous and bad it was. People just fall over, it's actually funny.

@@kraanz if all you are watching is the combat then you are a blind person.

@@MrChickennugget360 There's more than incredibly bad combat in this clip?

@@kraanz yes.

Это фентази руссы были на головы выши военном деле воров

In every viking show or movie they have a tremendous plot armor😅

@@MrChileno13 это же сказка. Не когда они не ходили на русь. Грабить. Славяне были на голову выше военном деле. Только торговля и найм на военую службу

True, but it can kind of be justified by the terror that the berserkers inspired on them. Seeing a bunch of giant 6ft+ jacked, drugged up psychopaths rip your friends' throat with their teeth and then howl like wolves is pretty insane. The myths of werewolves were inspired by berserkers

@@SpookyRumi they were not that tall, just drugged

Gas not nearly as brutal as burning alive

The nazis (not only them) also burned people alive...

lol you are fed propaganda and a slave

​@@binewtv2214both are pretty brutal really

The movie Come and See has a very hard to watch scene where the Nazis burn a barn like this scene but it’s much more brutal.

And protein bars

Tarantino? There's 20 directors that should be put ahead of him

@@KingMeeqs Nah, Tarantino is in top 3 for sure.

@@hexerei02021 nope

@@baileyjaytweets as realistic as a movie can be

What a turnaround lol. Thank you for commenting and please subscribe if you have not so, it really means so much to us to see your support!

Swiss sylvannia or slyvannya

We are all humans, in case of.

This was probably common practice for most civilization living in that era to ensure the kid won't come back for vengeance.

@@Antagoniusz if you could recommend some books or website which could be trusted

Брат это индийское кино🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣 руссы 🇷🇺 намного сильнее были военном деле. 💯И шайки воров наркоманов не могли побеждать.

Slavs living by the sea also often raided Scandinavia. Danes with the help of Poles conquered England, establishing Danelaw. Check out The Saga of Magnus the Blind and Harald Gille. The saga describes the victorious expedition of the Pomeranian Duke Racibor to the Vikings' center of royal power - Konungahella (today it's Kungälv in Sweden). In short. Most people's of that time plundered, pillaged, raped and murdered. Most were often assholes. That's why we can do it better. Stick together and help each other in need instead of fighting, like savages. Regards ;)

Hahahaha. It was intentional.

I'D PAY MONEY JUST TO SEE THAT!

I’m so glad this was explained. Slavetrader Queen threw me. Who is this random woman leading all of these savages lol

Definitely a layered film! I was blown away by the cinematography first time, now after a few more watches I noticed all the same things!

This movie and even this scene is far from 'accurate'....

Although some nations were/are way more brutal than others, Nordic Vikings are among them

So many innocents dead, brutally.. It just doesn't make sense. May they rest in peace.

This is history, my friend. We live in a bubble. The peace we've enjoyed will not last, and its ideals are anomalous, not regularity. You may say, "innocents," but this is just how life works in a world that is untamed.

@@gammadion in a world that is untamed there is still right and wrong, and humans are capable of critical thought. The countless people who have been brutally murdered throughout history, and still today, example the cartels, is just depressing. people killing, not for a righteous cause, such as self defense, but just for possessions and power. It's senseless.

Some of them also ate parts of their enemies like hearts, nose, and fingers. But there's also no denying these guys were great explorers.

I was thinking the church burning from Come And See

Which was a callback to when the SS burned the French in a church.

Hey man if the normans can do it to the saxons in Sicily

Never happened in the American independence war, just a Gibsonisation.

Because the Vikings mostly went after civilians and raided merchants - they didn’t fight armies. They went for easy targets.

@@Malally2 Sigurd Jorsalfare, Harald Hardråde, Harald Hårfagre and Olav Tryggvason would like to have a word with you. Learn some basic history before you make a stupid comment

@@meisrerboot what I said is not a lie, it’s fact. Yes they had triumphs in certain battles. Statistically, they mainly went after easy targets and that is how they were able to sustain their army.

In real life the Vikings/scandinavians were scary for the common people, those who could not defend themselves mainly as their tactic was to attack where its less defended. Because they were never a military powerforce despite being individually ferocious. If an army came they fled. They were simply pirates who got romanticized by modern lectures.

@@ForeskinWillis true that, people complaining that the militia in this scene didn't put up a fight but vikings pretty much always went for easy targets.

@@ForeskinWillis Pirates are awesome. The Greeks did the same shit back in the day.

​@@gammadion Piracy is and was common for every era, my problem is the worshipping of pirates, we don't praises the Greeks for their piracy we praise them for their philosophy, architecture and warfare accomplishments while the Viking are mostly praised for their brutal raids over innocents civilians and we forget what most of them actually were : Merchants. And pirates were never awesome, go to Somalia and tell me if you want to become a pirate, it is and always was a miserable life guided by greed and cruelty.

they really did not. we have plenty of representations of "berserkers" typically they arent naked. because they arent morons. they wear lighter armor and cloth. and typicaly vikings arent very big either. Raiding across the sea at 6foot plus is not a very good idea for some very obvious reasons. Big soldiers arent useful in a melee, your just going to die to a bunch of small guys while you run out of energy instantly. thats fine in this case because this film is a viking legend. its not supposed to be completely realistic.

lmao vikings were an average of 5’7

It’s the Scythians whom were big. Avg Scythian was 6’3” and Scythian elites were 6’6”+, towering over the global average. Descendants of the Aryans, they are the red haired blue eyed giants of the steppe who made conquest long before the Mongols, Huns, and Turks. Among them were the Enaree, the priest class of the Goddess, Men who mastered their masculine and adopted the feminine traits and dress, they were as beautiful as they were dangerous, and are whom the ‘female’ Amazonians are referenced to. By the 600BCE’s chief among the Scythians was Bardiya/Gomata, who became Shah of Shah for a short period of time before he was sacked by Darius Great. You will know Bardiya/Gomata better as the Buddha. Bardiya, Saman Deviyo of Sri Lanka, and Manjushri of Shambhala, all of whom are of Aryan stock, made up the Shakyamuni Triad whose stories fleshed our ‘Buddha’ meaning Enlightened Ones. Shakyamuni meaning Sages of the Saka (Scythians). The Shakyamuni Triad cultivated the Dharma with the assistance of Rigden Suchandra of Shambhala, the purpose of it was to act as a counter point to the war, chaos, and suffering going on in that age of Ares. Also, the Wolf is a Cro Magnon reference. They used Wolves to hunt the Cannibal Neanderthals whom were feasting on their kin. The wolf and Lion (Lion Man/Narasinha) archetypes carried on via the Aryans who descend from them following the cataclysms, and spread into Eurasia. The Aryan chieftain Odin taking his Koryos (Warband) known as the Æsir/Asura into Europe establishing the Corded Ware who subjugated the Vanir/Vanaspati being the Funnel Beaker, and the Aryan Rhudra taking his Koryos thereafter into the Steppe establishing the Fetyanova which then became the Sintashta and then Andronova which diffused with the Harappa civilization of the Indus Valley from whom came forth the Vedic Aryans- the combination of Aryan Magi and Harappa Yogi’s- who brought to India the Ism (Ideology) of the Indus (Hindu). The Aryan split into Europe and India is what the politically correct term ‘Proto-Indo-European’ refers to. From the Corded Ware descend the ancient Germanic and Scandinavian peoples through whom the Wolve archetype was continued, while the Lion archetype was continued in the Indian subcontinent, namely among the Sinhalese who have some 23% R1A and 38% R2 Genes, where Sri Lanka in the Mahabharata was referred to as Simhaladvipa meaning Island of Lions.

@@leonvic Back then it was taller than most. Scandinavians (including Iceland) are still some of the tallest/biggest people on earth to this day.

Glad you noticed ;)

ukraina is not our slowian blood.. and this country is illegal like israel.. too much to write you soo i just leave it.. SERBIA RUSSIA SLOVAK CZECH that is slowian country...

Watching the movie I would come to conclusion there's Ukrainian blood among Scandinavians

@@goxyeagle8446 Yup

@@goxyeagle8446 hahah

😂😂😂😂😂 в украинцах татарской крови много. Откуда скандинавская. Здесь типа показана север запад руси. Все это сказка. Некогда они не ходили на русь грабить.

To be fair the village wasn't prepared for a surprise attack. It was pretty small and it looks like most of the men were away considering there's barley any bodies by the end.

We are the same people. It's just that we don't need to do that anymore to survive or make more money than our fathers. Also, violence was monopolized by the state, and them has the right to use it. Which avoid those kind of situation, most of the time.