Japp, absolut genial.

I have the same situation. I drive 140 km a day and have bought a E-Golf 2017 today. I Will be getting It in a week!

@@jesper3185 Good luck with your vehicle Jesper! Then give us some feedback from your daily use. Cheers

@@brunofernandes6518 i’ve used the car for about a week and its amazing. I use about 13,15 kWh / 100. The airconditioning is using pretty much, about 50 kilometers range and I saw the heating using extremely much so i cant use It a normal gasoline car unfortunatly

@@jesper3185 same here, love it 😁👍

Thanks. Usually at the end ;)

Latest. 35 kWh

Sounds good. Used?

Yes used. 60.000 km on the clock. But that range of 180 km is not great right? I can’t charge at home. And also not at work. I drive 240 km a week. On internet i found that the car cost €5,50 per 100 km to charge public. Per month it’s not so cheap i think

Cool.

Depends on the charger and provider. Starts at 29 cent per kWh.

Wauw that’a cheap. In my street on a public charger ( can’t charge at home) they ask €5,50 for 100 km! And on the highway on fastned they ask €9,75 per 100 km. With a leaf with a range of 200 km i had to charge 2 times a week. I think that’s not cheap. ( the Netherlands)

Even my other car the prius was cheaper on gas per month. Than charging the leaf

The average speed doesn't correlate to average consumption because air resistance is non-linear with speed. It goes approx as velocity squared. So high speed means high consumption but little contribution to average speed (because it takes less time to cover the same distance). While low speed means lower consumption but high contribution to average speed (because it takes longer to cover the same distance). Basically the average speed of 130 km/h mostly reflects the time he spent at 0-120 km/h, while the energy consumption mostly reflects the time he spent at 147 km/h. It's not what he'd get if he drove 130 km/h the entire time. If you assume the 125 mi (201 km) nominal range is measured at 100 km/h (62 mph), taking into account only aerodynamic losses we should expect a range of: 55 mph (88.5 km/h) = 159 miles (256 km) 62 mph (100 km/h) = 125 miles (baseline) 70 mph (113 km/h) = 98 miles (158 km) 80 mph (129 km/h) = 75 miles (121 km) 90 mph (145 km/h) = 59 miles (95 km) 91 mph (147 km/h) = 57.6 miles (92.8 km) That tracks pretty closely to this test where he spent most of the time at 91 mph, with an average speed around 80 mph, and managed to travel a bit over 100 km. (This estimate is only taking into account aerodynamic losses, not hotel loads and other losses. So it won't be very accurate below about 55 mph. But the 55 mph estimate falls pretty close to the extreme upper range owners have reported of about 160 miles under ideal conditions.)

@@solandri69 ...your chart above is EXACTLY what i've been seaching for! thanks for doing the mathwork because the GOM is practically useless! 🙂