The carrier that needs a permanent tug boat escort.

This carrier was stolen from Ukraine before it was finished. The Russians never finished it or got the engines to work properly. The sailors have never had hot water. Basic amenities do not work, it is falling apart and has suffered multiple fires and breakdowns. The Russian navy has had over a century of catastrophic naval ineptitude. Truly comedic. Such as the time the Russian Navy attacked the British fishing fleet in the North Sea thinking they had reached Japan. Luckily they fired a good proportion of their shells but missed with almost all of them. This aircraft carrier could never be described as powerful. A powerful risk of breaking down. Needing powerful tug boats to accompany it everywhere. It is a dry dock queen that needs to be scrapped.

Russia literally has zero carriers at this moment. The one they have can’t even move. Literally

Russia's only aircraft carrier is the Admiral Flota Sovetskogo Soyuza Kuznetsov (Admiral of the Fleet of the Soviet Union Kuznetsov), which is technically a heavy aircraft cruiser. It was built in Ukraine during the Cold War and launched in 1985. The ship has been out of service since November 2018 for a refit, and it's unclear if or when it will return to service. Some US Navy officials have expressed concerns that the carrier is unfit for service. Russia is a paper tiger

Does anyone with any understanding of naval history look at these videos before they’re published? This video shows images of the British battleship HMS Warspite in its WW2 role while talking about a submarine of the same name. Good grief.

Unlike the USN whose 11 aircraft carriers use nuclear power, Admiral Kuznetsov uses a goopy, tar-like petrochemical called mazut as fuel, leading to it leaving a visible trail of heavy black smoke that can be seen at a great distance. So if the Kuznetsov ever leaves its current drydock (doubtful) it can always be easily identified and tracked using nothing more than Mark I Eyeballs.

The problem with the Russian Navy is that they can build such ships but they could never maintain them.......

I know it keeps warm, campfires all over the ship

LMBO Moskuva made a hell of an "impression" on the bottom of the Black Sea !!! 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

Russia doesn’t currently have an operational aircraft carrier and the Russian navel flagship is sitting on the bottom of the Black Sea!!

The USN has more Super Carriers than the rest of the World combined.

One of them became China's first carrier and the problems persist there too.

Current scrap value of the KantTakeOv is at least thirty to thirty-five turnips.

Just ask India how good Russian/Soviet carriers are they bought one and for a while there it looked like they were going to declare war on Russia in a attempt to get their money back.

43,000 tons is a small aircraft carrier. About half the tonnage of a Ford class.

The Kuznetsov usually has to sail with a large sea-going tug…because every time she sails, her engines breakdown.

What they’re not saying here about the Syrian war, is that the ship had so many problems that after a while, its planes were transferred to an airbase on land to continue their mission. Let’s also keep in mind that the Soviets didn’t have the funds. At no point in time did the Soviet economy exceed 15% of that of the USA, not mention the EU, Japan, etc. They simply couldn’t finance everything they wanted to. By the early 1980s, the country’s economy was in retreat, called the Great Stagnation. That led to their breakup. Afterwards, the Russian economy was, and is, even smaller. Today, for example,e, the USA economy is almost 26 trillion. The EU is around the same. The Russian economy is estimated to be around 1.8 trillion, around the same as New York State. But there are 16 million people in New York to spread the money around in, while there are about 146 million Russians in a vastly larger territory. It’s why Russia is so poor that most classifies as a third world country. The war in Ukraine and subsequent sanctions are crippling it. And despite what you might hear, China is being very wary of helping that war.

How many potatoes does that thing cost?

Is that a sarcastic title for the video ?

it's powerful? I hear nothing but problems with this ship

The Soviet Union never had any aircraft carriers, they had aircraft cruisers.

Will give them credit they could build a ship, but not carriers. Its parked in a dock and likely wont ever be reused. Those things require trained maintenance.

It's a mobile reef

One carrier that has been under repair, lacks modernization. Whats insane is this authors lack of truthful information.

Historicaly Russian navy was always the weak part of their military.Exept the submarines I don't think their surface fleet is able to much more than defend the coast waters of Russia.

This aircraft carrier is the only aircraft carrier that needs for tugboats to go along with its mission. How funny is that those Russians they’re so funny and silly they make me laugh they must’ve got into the vodka again. Also, it’s the only aircraft carrier that you know where it’s going from 200 miles away by its plume of smoke ! If that’s not the funniest thing in the world

They should have named it the T-72 Tank.

it will sink like their nuclear subs

One who served in the russian army never laughs at a circus...

If it can float , it can sink. A fellow navy vet told me that one. He was a torpedoman on a sub.

Just remember, a sub with torpedoes can send it down to join DAVIES JOHN fleet in a hearts beat....

Russian carrier??? This is a joke. 😂😂...

Is this a joke ? 😂😂😂

I don't think 'Insanely Powerful' is how I would describe their carrier disaster.

The Russian Aircraft carrier is a complete JOKE. What a BS article. 😅😅😅

Is the title meant to be sarcastic?

Is the title supposed to say "...Aircraft _Carrier_ Program"?

That ramp at the end of the carrier deck was a good idea.

The Kuznetsov: a 40k space hulk in real life

You they put it in a dry dock… that also set on fire and sank…

The Soviets even had the Graf Zeppelin German Carrier at War's End !

It’s a POS.

What a joke. One of them used once. It needs a tugboat to go anywhere. It smokes so bad blind people can see it. It’s a dock yard warrior.

As an American...I visited Leningrad in 1989.The Country and the Russian people that I met and interacted with were phenomenal, absolutely the best individuals that I have ever had the pleasre of meeting in /out of every foriegn port that i have ever visited .... I think that the citizens are as normal and freedom loving as any American that i have ever met.. Simple kindly and trustworthy are three descriptions that come to mind I woukd re visit that City any time for any reasonable activity and maybe st assiredly would come away thinking the same positive things as I have since my first trip yhere❤

The real power are the Subs they have. Maybe 😂

The moskva is sleeping with fishes in the black sea. Also putler wanted gold taps to all his rooms in his huge datsha rather then fixing the carrier.

If they build it Ukraine will create another submarine!

Insanely Powerful! Haha! OMG that is so freakin funny! This ship has been a disaster since it was launched. As I understand it this carrier is stuck in harbor and dry dock 98% of the time it was launched until now. It must make Putin have nightmares that the US Navy runs 11 carriers that all are 10 times the ship this one carrier is. That isn’t the funniest part, the US Navy has about 10 more carriers that are in shutdown or mothballed state. If needed they could be upgraded and put back in service that would make Navy have 21 carriers and they are currently building 8 more Ford class super carriers! At a point in 9 years the US Navy could have 29 carriers which would out number all the rest of the world’s carriers combined. Yeah, Putin must have nightmares about that.

Russian Gong Show of "military power"

Admiral Kuznetsov has been fitted with special landing nets on the deck and soon will be sailing the Donbas landing T-72 turrets.

The Admiral Flaming Kuznetsov, you mean... thing is a floating crematorium! 😆😅🤣😂

I’m not sure if they used those Soviet Union war planes during there invasion war with Ukraine

That aircraft carrier is a propaganda fable. Much like the T-14 Armada.

Looked at the title of the video and LMAO🤦‍♂️

Warspite is a nuclear submarine, your footage is of the WW2 battleship..

Navy leadership: captain, congratulations! You just promoted and is on track to be ome the next commanding officer of Kuzentsov! Again, congratulations on your achievement. Russian Captain: trips himself down the stairwell.

Is this some kind of joke? Even if this POS functioned (which it doesn't) and stopped randomly bursting into flames (it can't) , it's still HALF the size of the USS Enterprise which was commissioned in 1958! Hell, my bass boat has launched just as many aircraft (0) in the last 3 years as this turd. And my boat moves under its own power and has NEVER burst into flames! Yall wanna do a video on it? Hell, I even bet my sonar is more advanced 🤣

Maybe Russia is better off with Mutiple use warships aircraft that are cheaper to maintain and more effective than the behemoth carriers, unless they convert this museum piece into a drone carrier I guess..

I'm just surprised it's still floats at this point.

Insanely powerful? Lol

Are they aircraft carriers or are they Russian cigarette lighters

4 tugs permanently assigned to her flotilla ...😂

You should have the music from Red October in this video

Lmfao. Russia has one carrier and its a shit truck. A straight up rust bucket.

Russia doesn't even have the funding, if they did build one they' can't use it in the Black sea nor the Baltics sea because it will be watched closely.

Part of the problem is the same issue the Chinese have. Experience. It takes decades and blood and sweat to learn how to run a carrier group. Neither Russia or China have that experience.

The admiral Knutsac has shown how backward russian naval architecture and engineering has fallen behind the developed world. Both China and India have been able to produce viable aircraft carriers of higher quality and greater service availability, russia should scrap theirs and buy one from India or China.

It'd be ironic, but Russian could propose some kind of military exchange agreement with China particularly focused on the repairs on the Kuznetsov.

Insanely powerful?..ha…ha

Everybody knows that things a piece of junk

Kuzia is a ship?

When I toured the North Carolina years ago, I was told that the 16” guns required 16 silk bags of powder behind each 16” shell. Is that true for the New Jersey as well? Thanks for sharing, great video!

Isn’t this the ship that has to have a tug boat with it every time it leaves port.

"powerful" Soviet carrier. That is laughable to begin with. These things showed how terrible there are almost immediately. And these days can't even leave dry dock.

Sovjet/Russia is a land empire so a major problem is that they have four rather split up fleets. Uboats are much easier to move between them descreat.

What else is new with *reliability russian* products

The entire impression of the Kuznetsov class and its development is completely incorrect and it is not remotely borne of the Soviet aircraft carrier program. It is a modified Kiev, it's the same hull. In fact Kievs were sold to India and China and converted to Kuznetsov class, that's where they got theirs from, only Kuznetsov and Varyag were actually built as a ramp equipped "missile cruiser with air complement" using a Kiev hull, the Chinese got Varyag which they completed themselves and then converted their Kiev to a Kuznetsov using Varyag as a basis India's Kiev was bought as part of a deal with Russia to convert it to a Kuznetsov from the beggining, deleting the surface action element of VLS antishipping missiles under the flight deck and operating as a true light aircraft carrier, where the Russian Kuznetsov operates as a missile cruiser with air complement and has a very powerful missile armament. Thus the Indian version is a light warship and the Russian one a heavy warship, because it's a heavy cruiser armed the back teeth, the Indian one is just a light carrier. The two types, despite being of the same class should not be confused. But as far as Kiev and Kuznetsov goes, the Kuznetsov is an enlarged and modified Kiev, built on a Kiev hull and just about doubling its displacement. It is not its own design. The Soviet aircraft carrier program is completely separate and has nothing to do with Kuznetsovs, except in one context as a training and experience proxy for the future actual carrier program since it operates fixed wing naval jetfighters. The actual carrier program was cancelled is what happened and Kuznetsovs were the only other thing that resembled a carrier, but it isn't what they are, they're not aircraft carriers in Russian service, they're fleet ASW escort cruisers expanding the Kiev role to include air screening on top of ASW, with secondary surface action support. They were always intended to replace Kievs, never to be a carrier class. In fact their SAM suite is the primary arm of their aerial screen role, and the fighter jets more an extension of that than an actual fleet air arm. The primary air arm of Kuznetsov is in fact its ASW helicopters, roughly about twice as many as fixed wing aircraft. They also do fire control duties for the long range antishipping capabilities of the fleet. The fighters on Kuznetsov do not have a role of force projection, only as fleet air screening, ie. CAP and secondarily light interdiction generally of small vessels which may interfere with fleet operations or some minor amphib shore support although this element is largely undeveloped and was intended for navalised versions of Su25U ground attack aircraft in the future. Kuznetsov has always been operated in a training capacity and never at full load and combat capability, so generally less than 20 fighters and about 40 helicopters have been carried but its capacity is for around 30 fixed wing jets, ostensibly intended for 2 squadrons Su33 or MiG29K and 1 squadron Su25. Operating in a training capacity as it does it actually keeps around a dozen Su33 in two light squadrons and about four 2gen MiG29K for development purposes due to the Indian contract for those and its ongoing development. If Russian carrier programs continue it is assumed the MiG29K will replace the Su33 due to its technological updates, otherwise an Su35 would have to be navalised as this is this was based on the Su33 airframe deleting naval equipment and digitalising the systems from analogue. That would be expensive and India already paid for MiG29K development. The operations in Syria were a special training exercise for Navy pilots separately from Kuznetsov as a combat element and largely superfluous to the conflict. Whether significant of continued Russian interest in a future, true fleet carrier project, or merely sabre rattling with NATO to suggest that it is, is an unknown. But it is absolutely not a normal operation for Kuznetsov to send aircraft to attack ground targets in any significant operation, it could never sustain this type of mission to a degree of any impact. Ground based strike and multiroles are used for that, in numbers and operated from the Russian airbase in Syria doing a lot more than the Kuznetsov air wing. There are no targets Russia would require a fleet aircraft carrier to launch strikes from, their entire strategic military posture is defensive, which means primarily concerned with border territories rather than describing their attitude. Force projection on distant targets would be handled by the submarine or rocket forces, or in conventional terms by land based aircraft of both Frontal and Long Range Aviation regiments, since Flankers have literally thousands of miles combat range and fight as good as an Eagle. The most fascinating thing about the Kuznetsov class is that it has better sea keeping than the Kiev upon which it is based and modified. The trouble with the Kiev and reason they're not popular with the Russians is their sea keeping is regarded as white water craft, unsuitable for extended ventures into the open ocean. Not as bad as the Moskva class helicarriers but definitely can't handle rough open oceans. Completely by accident the Kuznetsov was discovered to have improved stability due to the weight and bulk increase of modifications so much that it is a true blue water vessel, the first of its kind unbound to coastal and small sea operations, assuming the engines don't break down but if they don't it can do storms and act as its own dry dock afterwards like good fleet heavy warships should. Also the Turkish International Treaty governing entry to the Black Sea specifically refers to catapult equipped aircraft carriers. No catapults, no problem. It doesn't matter what you call the damn thing. It was to prevent combined heavy carrier battlegroups from entering and dominating the entire regional air power with hundreds of NATO naval fighters and nuclear bombers. Helicopter carriers, amphib docks, ski launch carriers, all fine. Big NATO carrier battlegroups, piss off nobody made you the world police. That's the treaty and it's partly because, due to the Azov security district Russia may feel backed into the corner of going full pre-emptive nuclear on NATO if carrier battlegroups start throwing their weight around in the Black Sea, a very vulnerable belly of Russian strategic territory. It has their main military academy district there and their oil reserves.

Was the Mucova mentioned the same one Ukraine sank just recently or a later edited?

"insane" is the right word...😅 One of the main engines/groups has never started, the dark smoke plume from its funnel can be spotted from tens of miles, the living conditions are terrible, never fully resolved issues with air conditioning, WCs, fresh water, steam conducts... and it it caught fire at least two or three times....😅 And those are just the well known issues... can't imagine those which are still unknown....

"The Insanely Powerful Soviet Aircraft Carrier Program" will not get you taken seriously

What a load of BS. The carrier has spent more timein dry dock than at sea. Please nno more of the AI narration.

Insanely Powerful ?

FFS , the least they could do is lay it up in dry dock

the STOBAR aircraft carrier doctrine of the Russian Navy is a compromise between limited capabilities & low operational costs . . . Russian Navy's doctrine revolves around it's heavily armed surface combatants & submarines . . . based on a layered overlapping line of offensive & defense capabilities . . . infact the Russian Navy classifies it's nuclear powered submarines as it's primary capital fleet . . . expeditionary mission profiles & strategic sea lift falls under the navy's tier 2 level of active deployment, be it peace time or some state-of-war like situation . . . operating STOBAR aircraft carriers was never it's forte either . . . rather it has always been a competition against the USN & it's legendary carrier strike groups . . .

"The *Insanely Powerful* Soviet Aircraft Carrier Program"??? What is really *insane* is that label of this clip. Clickbate?

I know it's politically untenable but why not send it to China for a mechanical overhaul? The Chinese seem to have better luck with it.

The Admiral Kuznetsov will never go to sea again. Its air wing was transferred to Ukraine as well.

Remember the zumwalt? 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂

Insanely weak Soviet aircraft carrier program you mean

Well , they already have one don't they ? Hahahaha hahahaha.

tyvm for another upload, eh 🦬🇨🇦😁

This ship is a shitbox. The only reason it is ever escorted is for when it inevitably needs a tow back to port. LMAO!

Another craft to sale cheap to China and then converted to a floating park ?

Should just scrap it.

The Kuznetsov is a joke. Likely will never sail again.

You mean the powerfully insane carrier program? 😄

There are better jokes than this to be found elsewhere on KZfaq.

This is flooding dumpster

Insanely powerful? Compared to what? A bathtub? 😂😂

Quit watching when I seen powerful describing Russian aircraft carrier.