These old US army videos are the best educational material i have seen
@maysammirzakhalili48623 жыл бұрын
Why they are not creating new ones? God bless america 🙏🏻.
@chubiin20s363 жыл бұрын
Ikrrr such an interesting way to make the concept understand
@kermiadjamil40903 жыл бұрын
Agreed
@sbiner54803 жыл бұрын
@Keyur fair enough
@frankcastle12162 жыл бұрын
That's because U.S. Army is the absolute best of all military organizations! Hooah! 😛
@Sphyxx9 ай бұрын
So easy to follow and no unnecessary complicated jargon, old time videos to teach are just top notch.
@Kawka11228 ай бұрын
Niel degrasse Tyson is the smartest scientists on the planet USA!
@Envious__8 ай бұрын
Because the DOD understood that they needed to train and explain super complicated subjects to people who might not have even graduated high school. Using real world examples such as the “4th of July” analogy made things easier to understand.
@Eduardo_Espinoza8 ай бұрын
Why can't school be like this?
@magos26108 ай бұрын
It isn't that old actually since modern artillery is the same as ww2 only with a compurers attached to it. Also in the Ukraine they use the old pieces of artillery with the help of drones to correct the fire and that duo is almost as effective as the modern ones with computers.
@Kawka11228 ай бұрын
@@magos2610 no. Modern artillery even barrel is electronic instead of steel.
@buckleberryofficial7613 Жыл бұрын
Took Ballistics in school, Fascinating subject, things go up things go down
@osmacar5331 Жыл бұрын
yes sir yes sir yes sir. fuck off sir.
@hanzchii92458 ай бұрын
What came up must come down -Le boolet
@whereswaldo57408 ай бұрын
Tom Lehrer. Wernher Von Braun.
@F-Man8 ай бұрын
@@whereswaldo5740A man whose allegiance is ruled by expedience!
@anthonylimjoco59588 ай бұрын
Ya it has it's ups and downs
@2fast2block8 ай бұрын
I've done a LOT of reloading of various calibers for handguns since I was into pistol shooting competition. I made SURE I followed the specs because things have to be so precise. Watching this excellent vid helped me understand so much more. Thanks.
@Eduardo_Espinoza8 ай бұрын
Yes this is a great starters' guide to honing down your ballistics. :)
@2fast2block8 ай бұрын
@@Eduardo_Espinoza I've seen pistols blow up either because the person reloaded a double charge of powder or they didn't load powder in a particular round, so the primer put the bullet in the barrel, squib, they think they have a jam so they manually cycle in the next round and BAM. Certainly most can tell if they had a squib or not.
@Romanov1177 ай бұрын
No special effects, less music, no one acting on screen for most of the time. *This is the true educational video.*
@ayebraine5 ай бұрын
I agree that it's great, but it is CHOCK FULL of special effects shots. Manual animation is usually the most expensive type of shot available (measured in hundreds of dollars for a second of runtime), and this uses such animation, albeit quite a simple kind. You can make the same animation today with vector tech and flash-like programs for pennies, sure. If you don't factor in labor costs. But with 1950s tech, this is very expensive VFX that required filming animated stuff frame by frame, then re-filming it many times over to composite it with animated effects in studios. Not to mention that even now, you'd pay a lot for a good director, good storyboarder, good animator, and good motion designer to get a video as effective as this.
@DeadPollo8 ай бұрын
7:37 I do believe this is one of the hypothesis of what happened to Scott's RN50 in Kentucky Ballistics: a round filled with this type of powder
@azpok89058 ай бұрын
Yes, he did a video that explain this. And I think this is what happened
@raico68908 ай бұрын
Must be that, he was using that spicy SLAP ammo
@Kawka11228 ай бұрын
@@raico6890 it was D1-LDO Ammo
@suprememasteroftheuniverse8 ай бұрын
There's no theory. Your beloved gunmaker is a psychopath and must be arrested. Scott too. He's also a danger to public safety. All gun KZfaqrs, as good psychopaths too, went out of their way to defend him with all kinds of ridiculous theories to not loose their easy KZfaq money. Not a single f for human life.
@raico68908 ай бұрын
@@suprememasteroftheuniverse shut up, aguante el diego y Messi campeon brazuca
@lisocampos80808 ай бұрын
That kid became an artillery man
@rodneyspence7441 Жыл бұрын
Precise dropping of bombs was also a big problem. There was a certain type of bomb sight developed by the US military during WW2 that provided very accurate bombing, but the name escapes me at the moment....
@thestupidchannel2037 Жыл бұрын
It was the norden bomb sight, it promised to have extremely high accuracy but failed to deliver, although it was more accurate than the bomb sights at the time. It used a compact computer and more advanced instruments to predict where the bomb would fall. The norden bomb sight was used on the Enola Gay dropping of the little boy atomic bomb on japan.
@tunguska23708 ай бұрын
Mentally challenged bomb
@thomasrussell46746 ай бұрын
@@thestupidchannel2037 yes it's amazing the niche appearances of specialised computer-like machines prior to the Turing Colossus.
@paulmeredith45153 ай бұрын
Norton bombsights. Developed a perfected by a Brit engineer across the pond if I remember right
@kubricksghost60585 ай бұрын
This is brilliant, but I am sad that there isn't a brand new 2023 version of this on KZfaq! Fascinating subject which should be explored in detail.
@user-zc8sd8jx8s4 ай бұрын
nah. the 2023 version will have a lot of empty words, a lot of useless visuals, and end up being entertaining to the point of failing to deliver information.
@vaclavkrpec28798 ай бұрын
This was actually a good, informative material; I'm impressed.
@omarfaruque10953 жыл бұрын
This video is ruthless, still satisfying, a gem of time...?
@joanadarca1202 Жыл бұрын
Poi
@dannyarcher61639 ай бұрын
Made in the days when kids understood graphs.
@FieldSobrietyTest66768 ай бұрын
These videos explain a problem to you for understand FROM A VERY BASIC understanding and building up to the present problem. I really love it.
@mottee8 ай бұрын
There's a lot of misconceptions about what initially causes the recoil. This video explains it spot on. Excellent!
@peghead8 ай бұрын
I've seen illustrations of internal ballistics that show that at ignition, all forces inside the barrel are equal, that recoil can not occur until the projectile clears the muzzle, then all forces are directed to the rear of the barrel resulting in recoil. Forces such as the ejection of the projectile, expanding gases, unspent propellant, etc. (ejecta) contribute to the rearward push. I've seen 'super slo-mo' video of a 76mm cannon firing and the recoil began before the projectile left the barrel, my theory is the 3in x bore length column of air inside the bore was ejected as the projectile was traveling toward the muzzle acting as ejecta. I've seen recoil action semi-auto pistols firing in slo-mo that demonstrate that recoil doesn't occur until the bullet leaves the muzzle.
@mottee8 ай бұрын
@@pegheadSorry but that's wrong, the explanation and visualization on this film is right. Just a couple of things: - If at the moment of ignition forces inside the barrel would balance each other out, neither the gun or the bullet would move. In reality the forces acting on the back of barrel and on the bullet are (roughly) equal and certainly opposite, but they do not balance each other out, because they act on two different bodies (gun and bullet) and accelerate their motions in opposite directions. - The bullet, gases and ejecta rushing forward inside the barrel do not push the gun backward. On the contrary, the push the gun forward, because the friction and drag against the inside of the bore. But the backward force from the gas pressure in much greater, so the gun is pushed backward. This push is strongest while all stuff is still inside the barrel, because the pressure is strongest then. - In semiautomatic pistols the slide starts moving backward at the same instant the bullet starts its forward movement. I've seen hi-speed videos where this is very obvious. - Finally, and this should be obvious: we are dealing with contact forces here. Anything that does not touch the gun can not exert a force on it. So the bullet etc that has come out of the muzzle can't affect the gun any way. Unfortunately, I've noticed that those who don't believe the correct explanation usually can't be converted. They just do not understand Newtonian physics and interactions inside the gun. Which is not entirely their fault; these things are just generally taught so badly at school. PS. I have a PhD in physics education.
@peghead8 ай бұрын
Fair enough, but is not the projectile ejecta also? I once saw a concept where in the vacuum of space, a craft can be propelled by launching a projectile from the rear, in your explanation, one would merely have to launch a projectile contained in a very long, closed and sealed tube/barrel and as long as the projectile doesn't exit the tube, it would still exert an opposite force to the craft propelling it forward, at a slower velocity, of course.
@mottee8 ай бұрын
@@peghead In the described situation the craft would indeed be propelled forward. Let's assume it starts from rest. If we separate the projectile and the gas pushing it, then the craft is not propelled by the projectile but by the force the gas exerts to the craft. If we lump the projectile, gas, unburnt powder etc together as ejecta, then we can say that the craft is propelled by the ejecta. Using this terminology, when the ejecta reaches the other sealed end of the barrel, they exert equal and opposite forces to each other, which make both the ejecta and the craft to stop. But they both have moved from their original position; the craft has moved forward, the ejecta backward. What has not moved is the center of mass of the craft-ejecta system, which is assumed to be isolated from the rest of the world. Internal forces can't change the motion of the center of mass of a system. The principle is called the conservation of momentum. So in this case the system as a whole stays in rest all the time, in spite of that its parts move. Coming back to the recoil of a gun, conservation of momentum is in a way the simplest means to figure out why the gun starts to move backward at the same the bullet starts to move forward. No need to think about forces, their balances and directions. In order to keep the gun-gas-bullet system's center of mass in rest, when there's stuff moving forward, there must be stuff moving backward too. Of course in this case the system is not isolated, but at the moment of firing the forces accelerating the gun and the bullet are much greater than the forces holding the gun, so for a short time the gun behaves almost as if there were no external forces acting on it.
@peghead8 ай бұрын
Glad you replied, I've had an epiphany. I spent about an hour this morning reviewing extreme slo-mo videos featuring firearm discharges. A popular example was from an episode of "Mythbusters" and a 73,000 frames per second video of an M1911-style semi-automatic pistol. I watched it over and over, eventually taping a metal straightedge on the screen level with the bottom of the pistol's slide. I used the pause-key to slow the video down even further. Sure enough, the slide began a rearward movement, however slight, to the rear prior to the bullet exiting the muzzle, even to the extent that the rear of the slide was pushing the hammer to the rear, acting against two springs, the recoil spring and the hammer mainspring, telling me this was a formidable amount of force. The movement was less than a millimeter and did not effect the position of the pistol in any way. Long confession short, LIST ME IN THE CONVERTED COLUMN, you have opened my aging eyes, thank you. @@mottee
@joesmith92708 ай бұрын
Holy crap! Gotta love vintage mil training vids!
@jonkaminsky83822 ай бұрын
Sometimes I wonder if the people playing their instruments for these early films thought to themselves, “No need to hit every note perfectly because our music will just sound garbled and shitty anyway when played through a film projector!”
@smugisha Жыл бұрын
Classical and very informative.
@lastmashstanding21553 ай бұрын
If videos like this were in school I would have paid alot more attention.
@ryhol54178 ай бұрын
They are very good at education. I love watching these videos.
@jedimajic12 жыл бұрын
I'm very glad you are posting these ! They are very interesting - and very cool !
@joanadarca1202 Жыл бұрын
Poi
@brianwhite3878 ай бұрын
This is a very good explanation of ballistics. I was a field artillery fire direction nco for 5 years. Next we need to cover. Accurate gun and target info and. Met. Meteorology. How weather things like gravity and spin include the coriolis force. Ie the earth spinning underneath the projectile while in flight
@gibuzinari8 ай бұрын
Por que esses vídeos antigos são mais explicativos que os atuais
@currololo8 ай бұрын
Clear, concise and informative, this is how an educational video must be.
@dr.zaiuscientifico87139 ай бұрын
Amazing video
@Finnbearl61r8 ай бұрын
Verry good education for any reloaders too.. 😊
@justyuyun15578 ай бұрын
It's simple yet easy to understand and to the point . Now I know about gunpowder type . I thought it all the same .
@user-ir2cf9rh7d7 ай бұрын
Verry good education for any reloaders too.. . Por que esses vídeos antigos são mais explicativos que os atuais.
@user-gx5xi6tl3n8 ай бұрын
Materiales educativos impresionantes y mejor que muchos modernos ,muy al punto ,sencillos y hermosos en metodologia y demostrativos
@sploonge37 ай бұрын
Love this kind of videos ❤
@elarmeroalquimista11 ай бұрын
Top tier material of learning
@RoelKota-dc9md8 ай бұрын
I love old film.
@ivandobrodkin85208 ай бұрын
Очень понятный английский.
@Reknein4 ай бұрын
When was the footage originally published? In my opinion most of these old educational videos are much easier to understand than many modern videos with animated footage. Thanks for sharing!
@Geosbudy7 ай бұрын
Some people are busy making tiktok videos😮 These videos were created so many years ago and the quality of information is amazing
@suprememasteroftheuniverse8 ай бұрын
Now my neighbor will learn a lesson too.
@roypiltdown508316 күн бұрын
11:50 "lightning-fast computing machines" - gotta wonder how much computing power that roomful-of-tubes had in 1948, compared to my digital watch.
@user-bt3bo7hl6f5 ай бұрын
In 7th grade I did a science fair project on this and used this film as reference. Imagine doing that now.
@koba07987 ай бұрын
this amazing
@q_13t147 ай бұрын
I took ballistics at school, fascinating subject: things go up - things go down.
@princek739411 күн бұрын
Thanks for guiding me
@louiscervantez1639 Жыл бұрын
Excellent
@nannesoar3 жыл бұрын
I'm gonna make my kids watch these old documentaries when I'm a dad.
@SHVRWK2 жыл бұрын
Why the fuck would you show your kid a video about bullets science?
@joanadarca1202 Жыл бұрын
Maiki lin
@joanadarca1202 Жыл бұрын
50
@ILITLA8 ай бұрын
I loved it
@SteamCheese18 ай бұрын
Wanna prove the earth is round? Long range out of site artillery!
@victorfranca174 ай бұрын
Super cool
@saradolphin32428 ай бұрын
Pretty Darn Complicated!
@AussieDepresso4 ай бұрын
Thanks to the random KZfaq algorithm for showing me this on my recommended
@wolverinesdreams92938 ай бұрын
Neat!
@dangerr_xlmao13178 ай бұрын
the CIA giving out its award for excellence in journalism
@herosvicentegonzalez78722 жыл бұрын
"lightining fast compuetrs"
@craighalpin1917 Жыл бұрын
I believe Those were analog computers, surprisingly there are some reasons to believe that those computers may have been faster than modern computers (At least in curtain areas of complex math)
@herosvicentegonzalez7872 Жыл бұрын
@@craighalpin1917 now that i think about it, that makes sense
@PaulVerhoeven2 Жыл бұрын
This is 1948. The fact that they have shown computers at al is amazing (before that, "computer" was a name for a woman performing arithmetical operations by hand).
@nochalnosowski8 ай бұрын
top tier
@warstories171212 жыл бұрын
Thanks.
@SnipeU6963 жыл бұрын
Thank you.
@ERIK-4578 ай бұрын
Now, what if you put high pressure grains on a long barreled gun but make the gunbreach (and barrel too) strong enough to withstand the extreme pressure?
@PeterDercsar8 ай бұрын
Then you have a huge and expensive, long range gun. It is a waste of resources. You can reach the same range with a less expensive gun design.
@Gchang548 ай бұрын
@@PeterDercsarcalm down Einstein
@kalleklp72916 ай бұрын
It is simple and very informative within a short time. Today firing solutions are made by computers. Man is only there to decide on what to shoot.
@vijaykumarsupekar5057 ай бұрын
Excellent education
@tech-vp5xe7 ай бұрын
I'm a military trainings developer, I wish we could make stuff like this. Now stupid power point and similar slide show type training is forced everywhere.
@NoName-ef3jq7 ай бұрын
we hadn't even launched the first satellite during the filming of this documentary... Yet the people making it, found it obvious that the earth was a globe and rotated on its own axis... Just how are we getting so many flat earthers nowadays?
@crumblingtown12 жыл бұрын
well, sometimes they over spend in the military, but back then, they need to spend or else we might not have a country now.
@progamer33353 жыл бұрын
We are only overspending because other countries won’t honor their contract
@joanadarca1202 Жыл бұрын
Deismakilin
@Tattlebot8 ай бұрын
@@progamer3335 Bullshit. America wastes most of its military budget on trash. It's so bad that Russia could likely prevail in Europe against American air and naval power. Russia spent 5% of its GDP on acquiring that capability.
@noahtrujillo24498 ай бұрын
@@progamer3335elaborate, just curious. This comment is 2y old lol
@JohnDoe-jn4ex8 ай бұрын
Gee thanks, that was swell.
@Jadg.pz.kpfw.CC64-2M-Jumbo8 ай бұрын
Makes sense
@egor45956 ай бұрын
Feels like watching old Tom and Jerry cartoons
@smorrow8 ай бұрын
7:26 Fundamentals of Kentucky Ballistics
@tonyparete68928 ай бұрын
Your cell phone can figure out all of this now.
@ulrichkalber90398 ай бұрын
in 1948 they used both german (V2) and soviet (Katjusha) examples. MCMXLVIII= 1948
@sushishilpa90373 жыл бұрын
Good vedio to understand the concepbof boat tailed bullets and the degreasion progression concept
@joanadarca1202 Жыл бұрын
Deibes makilin
@onkcuf7 ай бұрын
Yay! Let's go destroy some "targets" now.
@bradschoeck15268 ай бұрын
Good ol unashamed intent to kill.
@rwsmith76389 ай бұрын
I reload my own ammunition. Ballistics can be fun.
@user-cm4us3hy7y8 ай бұрын
Ballistics is why I reload.
@skylerbowerbank58475 ай бұрын
Ahhh, black and white video This is how i know they are about to cover a complex subject in gradeschool terms
@pawelsawicki17508 ай бұрын
I cannot help but wonder, where would we be right now, as a humanity, if all this effort and means that are put to develop more effective and sophisticated ways of killing each other and destroying everything around us were spend on "peaceful" and "civilian" technologies.
@GustavoPinho894 ай бұрын
1948. Top notch
@niknovikov19198 ай бұрын
The trajectory without air resistance is wrong - it should be a symmetric parabola.
@PLAYERSLAYER_228 ай бұрын
its supposed to be like that so they can remove you from the room of cadets when you correct the training video and toss you into a secret research and development program.
@JESUSCHRISTISGREAT Жыл бұрын
What is the bomb at 14:49
@Itsprincesweets3 жыл бұрын
FASCINATING SUBJECT •v• THINGS GO UP THINGS DO DOWN
@Contentredacted.2 ай бұрын
I should go to a school to learn ballistics
@slugface3228 ай бұрын
MCMXLVIII = 1948
@cameronscanlan16207 ай бұрын
Bruv, is that a V-2? @0:50
@aksamarah8558 ай бұрын
Hi! Can anybody tell what is the system shown at 17:42 ? Please.
@Sui.Galadriel8 ай бұрын
Stalin's Organ?
@andrslnks48048 ай бұрын
US video shows A4 rocket 😂
@Supermatmike8 ай бұрын
leave it to old training and informational videos from the mid 20th century to explain topics in a simple and easy to follow manner.
@buttcracker8 ай бұрын
That’s cause the had to teach this to 18 year old kids, most of which didn’t even graduate high-school
@ayebraine5 ай бұрын
Frankly this is the same as if today, you hired the best talent / contractor for the video's direction, script, animation, motion design, and post production. The govt was the client and they chose expensive, reputed contractors. You WOULD get the same level of quality today. It's just that the clients/stakeholders don't spend that money on good training videos, because they deem basic information to be already available (since it's way more accessible now), and are only prepared to splurge on high-level presentation for THEIR management which is all fluff and marketing. They are kinda right in a way, in the sense that their staff will still obtain the information without a golden-level, memorable training video. So they put their priorities elsewhere.
@tankers4all2 жыл бұрын
O I know why they has to put that charge I think it’s a wood cap lol
@Imugi0078 ай бұрын
Why did i watch this entire video? 🤣
@barretthekid12 жыл бұрын
o okay sorry for the misunderstanding
@prukenope8 ай бұрын
Why the intro remind me Tom & Jerry lol
@AiiRv8 ай бұрын
Ah! LSMFT
@ScoutSniper31246 ай бұрын
8:50
@vikassingh-nl5ok5 ай бұрын
Gold
@gloryjoyabelidas18202 жыл бұрын
Hi maam 🤣🤣🤣
@lee-enfield02478 ай бұрын
The art of killing
@testickles88348 ай бұрын
The Art of removing Grid Squares.
@gloryjoyabelidas18202 жыл бұрын
Dela Cerna buang😂
@abbaruah968510 ай бұрын
'The gain' ?
@nuclearwarhead93388 ай бұрын
*Grain
@MikeHunt-rw4gf9 ай бұрын
Algorithm.
@yestermonth7 ай бұрын
Tom and Jerry ass intro
@blameusa70829 ай бұрын
12:23 You say the most economical........ this is hardly that
@barretthekid12 жыл бұрын
yeah but if we didn't spend all that money for that science we would possibly be speaking some other language right now. ( I'm not trying to be mean but i just wanted to inform you )
@juiceoverflow7 ай бұрын
thank god the english won out that battle innit bruv!
@user-wu6cy9lh7d8 ай бұрын
Greetings from Russia 🇷🇺 😊 it's very useful and informative 👍
@KALASH_MnE_V_LaVASh8 ай бұрын
Блин сделали бы перевод на русский ну блин((
@kolyqwerty37217 ай бұрын
Ты чо. Есть же перевод автоматический. Ну немного кривой но понятно.
@Clyde__Frog6 ай бұрын
Now I want to play Cup Head
@chriszablocki24608 ай бұрын
Y'all think I need to scientifically qualify my sexual health? I think your priorities are upside down.