Watch NASA's Deep Dive Into Orion Spacecraft (Artemis 1 Moon Mission)

Рет қаралды 21,112

CNET Highlights

Жыл бұрын

NASA engineers go in-depth explaining how the Artemis 1 Orion spacecraft will work during its mission.

Пікірлер: 44

@teli.tuketu Жыл бұрын

Does anyone have the temperature feed? How’d we get past 3000+ degres celsius? Thank you

@United_Wings Жыл бұрын

Nice

@oneryanalexander Жыл бұрын

Let's go!

@widayaniChan Жыл бұрын

very cool, enthusiasm for those who work in the proud section

@foxmccloud7055 Жыл бұрын

In regards to Orion, don't be surprised when we fly humans on Orion that we will hear about a few astronauts getting seasick.

@thestockfother Жыл бұрын

How far is deep space for their program?

@youliver9700 Жыл бұрын

1 inch to 1000 parsecs

@youliver9700 Жыл бұрын

depends on if it went well or not

@GeneralGrievousCIS 7 ай бұрын

Roughly speaking, anything beyond GEO

@Afrocanuk Жыл бұрын

Why haven't the U.S. caught up to Russia in landing the re-entry capsule on land? For Russia to be still doing this, it shows they've near perfected this aspect of capsule design. Now we'll have to load up another ship with cranes & helicopter to recover the capsule.

@CryptidTactical Жыл бұрын

Russian hasn’t gone to the Moon 17 times though

@Tarheel13 Жыл бұрын

Don’t use cranes.

@KukiNebproductions Жыл бұрын

Russia uses re-entry on land because they have loads of flat area and large area of places to land but its easier for america to land in the ocean. they have the most experience dropping a capsule like russias soyuz i feel would be too dangerous over U.S thoug boeing starliner plans on doing something simular to what you're expecting but I think its just what they're used too and they use boats to recover the capsule. Helicopters are actually used to recover the soyuz or the shenzou or cars and a large rescue team. I don't think either is worse then the other

@KukiNebproductions Жыл бұрын

@@CryptidTactical The U.S only went 5 times. well 5 landings and around 7 manned orbits. Russia has sent living things into lunar orbit and sample return missions and rovers things the U.S hasn't done and also matched robotic probes this is if you include the soviet union.

@carcinogen60yearsago 3 ай бұрын

@@KukiNebproductions The US landed 6 times And orbit of the moon 9 times Apollo 8, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16 and Apollo 17

@jonathanstein6056 Жыл бұрын

Great! Now, when is the first *manned* mission?

@hussarregiment7045 Жыл бұрын

2024, Core Stage-2 will be ready by early next year. And after that it's mostly integration with the already ready SRBs and ICPS. After that it's just a matter of finishing up the Orion Capsule, since the timeline of that is dependent on how Artemis 1 goes.

@davidjarrett45 Жыл бұрын

For NASA 2122 will be the first man mission

@RichardSanchez137 Жыл бұрын

As soon as they can find a Director just like how they did in '69.

@ct92404 Жыл бұрын

@@RichardSanchez137 Here come the flat Earther conspiracy theorist nuts...

@smiss5769 Жыл бұрын

@@ct92404 how has this anything about round or flat earth?

@johnwhiting6663 Жыл бұрын

Protection by aluminum tape😂

@keithstevens5614 Жыл бұрын

Wakanda Forever NASA - you can do it!

@brianreed7145 Жыл бұрын

Really?

@keithstevens5614 Жыл бұрын

@@brianreed7145 Yes really. Biden cancelled the kinda redundant Orion program but then replaced it with a BLM version called Artemis where only blacks need to apply. The Orion capsule was then recycled into the Artemis program.

@galacthicc693 Жыл бұрын

@@keithstevens5614 my guy Artemis was planned before Biden came into office

@galacthicc693 Жыл бұрын

Do a little research beforehand perhaps?

@galacthicc693 Жыл бұрын

@@keithstevens5614 also, there is no Orion program, Orion is a SPACECRAFT, and was designed based on the Crew Exploration Vehicle for the cancelled Constellation program (which was cancelled by Obama)

@zandvoort8616 11 ай бұрын

This is what NASA should have developed post Apollo, instead of wasting billions and decades on that ridiculous space shuttle!!!!

@tonybino01 Жыл бұрын

The Chinese Space Agency thanks NASA for its work. LOL.

@Alex-xg5kr Жыл бұрын

If they would have used Elon Musk's reusable heavy lifter the expenses would be a lot lower and it is more reliable. The SLS is new but there is no real innovation. It seems like the real brain is still Werner van Brown that developed the engines for the space shuttle 50 years ago... 50 years in space science is very old. We use it once and it gets destroyed... and it is not even close as efficient as the turbo engines version built by Russia, because it bleeds un-burnt fuel! It is good that we go to the moon, but it has to be done with a fiscal budget that is sustainable in the future. Cost will kill this project; it cost about as much as an election; tough choice democracy or the moon!

@Dr.Adenoid Жыл бұрын

I think that's because the project started around 2010 while the very first successful landing and recovery of a first stage was achieved by SpaceX in 2015. Nasa was already 5 years in development, I really believe you can't just scrap a billion dollars project because a new technology has just been found.

@brokensoap1717 Жыл бұрын

US can afford to do both. The annual cost of Artemis is a fraction of a rounding error in the federal budget.