hmm, irrelavent quotes or hard data, which is more convincing...

Give cities back to humans. Restrict cars and planes in and over densely populated areas.

Not going to happen. Your post is unrealistic.

​@@user-ew3dm1jq6j not unless we do something

@@user-ew3dm1jq6j burn plastic on earth day

stop parroting the narrative that is based on false science

.....yeah but if you build up more heat during the day then you lose during the night the temperature still go's up and vice versa. Thats how you get from winter to summer and back right? But the same go's for the whole cycle of winter and summer. If each summer we build up a bit more heat then we lose each winter eventually the whole planet gets hotter. THere is still a cycle but its just hotter overrall . Green houses Gasses trap more heat during the day by absorbing a wider spectrum of sunlight and releasing it more slowly, but also limit the removal of heat during the night by increasing the pressure in the upper atmosphere meaning heat loss through radiation only happens in the higher levels of the atmosphere which are already colder and thus facilitate less heat loss.

@@trickslies844 the moon keeps the planet in a 23.4 degree tilt, this is the reason for warming.

@@woodchipgardens9084 ...but that hasn't changed has it

@@trickslies844 this is the reason for the 4 season and that cant be changed and hasn't unless you ask Ignorant Climate activists.

@@woodchipgardens9084 The only thing ignorant here is the silly bench mark you are setting. Global warming does not mean that the planet won't have seasons at all, but that those seasons will be warmer on average with all the consequences that it brings. IE It might freeze but only for a few days rather then weeks on end or your summer heat wave might break the mid 40s rather then the mid 30s. If you are going to talk about something at least make sure you get that absolute minimum basics right before opening your mouth

Guess you should have learned a valuable skill that would allow you to make money. It's your own fault and your own choices that have led you to this place.

You don't have to be rich to buy a house.. it's called common sense

@@lindawashere4283 The appeal to common sense is a logical fallacy.

you do realize that climate change will hurt poor people the most right

@@rorycannon7295 Climate change is a hoax... It's called weather modification

For real. It's just so full of dense boneheads with half-baked "reasons" for not believing that climate change is a very real and existential threat.

They said all this a decade ago and nothing changed

@@jacobsukovaty520 clearly not paying attention

Satellites show that sea levels are rising, and in some places land is sinking and in others it is rising.

The bullshit propaganda is rising, and fast.

Pure hate from a right-winger.

According to predictions? It's going to clean up the entirety of Florida after that!

Is that why mother nature keeps dropping tornado's on to the bible belt?

Fake crap

And chemtrails

😂 is cloud seeding and chemtrails causing the oceans to rapidly warm?

So your argument is that the tons of chemicals we actually put in to the atmosphere are fine, its the magic secret chemicals that are doing all the harm durrr Cloud seeding if it where significant would reduce global warming by removing clouds (yes i know big shock, you probably thought it mean they make clouds but thats not what cloud seeding is)

If they realize this. How will they continue their agenda. Extracting money from tax payers. Just to finically prop up their donors and their businesses.

Don't ruin my dream of ocean front property.😂

Yeah this is all nonsense. Al Gore was wrong. The glaciers are just fine.

There alot of polar bear

@@user-pi2lq in the 1950s only 5000 over hunting and famous hunters were factors

Citations required.

@@jaykanta4326 Google, as I did.

@@StressRUs Burden of proof is on the claimant. Google is not a primary source, I can find flat earth justification by "google". Grow up.

@@jaykanta4326 I suppose you are correct, as you appear to lack the power of critical thinking.

@@StressRUs ah, another stupid comment rather than bringing research to support your nonsense

Tommy is one of the least creative "thinkers" on the planet. Using his gut feelings/philosophy you can pretend that all scientists are wrong when it makes you sleep better.

Sowell is a "deep thinker" for morons. Outside of the right-wing echo chamber no one cares about him or his nonsense.

I think he meant the politicians and wealthy ruling class, and the ''strongmen'', telling people to fear clear non-actual threats like ''wokism'' or LGBTQ or Muslims. NOT world-wide scientific organizations and scientists trying to warn us that we need to clean our act because the way of life, we KNOW is obviously unsustainable, is about to come collect its due.

Hopefully I'll be allowed to post this. Your explanation: kzfaq.info/get/bejne/sLdjg92KupeyZ3U.htmlsi=29S2E6GLeFQxWEaU

CO2 is a greenhouse gas. Of course there is outgassing with warming temps, but why deny the simple fact that additional CO2 warms the planet? This means that CO2 is THE CAUSE OF RISING TEMPS and that outgassing should also occur. But with such an increase the oceans are absorbing CO2. Yes please, ask those questions. But pay attention to the answers next time. How else would the planet be warming? Less Solar irradiation? An inch further away from the sun each year?

What causes the temperature changes?

@@Mew-ip3iy Changes in Milankovitch Cycles, which alters the intensity of and where sunlight hits the Earth's surface.

@@Mew-ip3iy If you want to learn more, look up "potholer54 does co2 lead or lag global temperature"

But if it keeps rising it *will* begin to interfere with our daily lives

The increase in sea level rise is exponential, and it's well over 3mm per year, now.

@@jaykanta4326 No, it is not exponential and the world-wide average is 2-3 mm per year. Just read IPCC and other reports....

@@mve6182 Yeah, it's exponentially increasing. "Climate-change-driven accelerated sea-level rise detected in the altimeter era", Nerem et al, 2018. It's not even remotely close to 2mm per year, it's currently over 3.4mm per year. You can no longer use a linear trend line to calculate sea level rise. You are a science denialist.

@@mve6182 "The Rate of Rise is Accelerating It was rising at 2.5 mm per year in the 1990s, then 3.4 mm per year in the 2000s, and now sea level is currently rising at about 4.8 mm (~. 25 inch) per year. That is exponential growth. If this trend continues, we could see 2-3 m (~5-10 ft) of sea level rise this century." Rising Seas Institute.

Neither of those are happening nor will they happen. AI doesn't care about to enough to end anything and Nuclear war is a childish fantasy that is easily avoided. Globabl warming is happening and its not stopping any time soon

If you live in the Arctic, it is starkly real. It's been ten years since indigenous, hamlet communities have had to move back from shore. They've now lost their lands. Educate yourself. It's all happening.

It’s not an immediate impact, it’s a slow roll, like taking drugs, over time it’ll get you and it gets exponentially worse.

​@@VanisleGirl1961Where exactly?

Sea level rise is currently 4.8mm/year. It's exponentially increasing.

Except it is increasing. Measurably so. We just haven't reached the point where the Arctic and Greenland reach their tipping melting points and unleash all that insane quantity of fresh water.

That's the thing though... it doesn't NEED to be!! We just aren't doing anything to stop it. We totally could have stopped it if we had gotten our crap together 30 years ago!! This isn't a God-sent apocalypse... we dug ourselves a hole and refuse to do anything besides try to dig ourselves out of it!! This was 100% avoidable!!!

Spread out the population. Make energy, grow food and raise livestock in cities where it is needed and give that land back to the masses newly freed from the societal controls of Regional Cable TV Choices.

Climate change can be significantly combatted without controlling populations.

Yes we can no longer stop it now... and we are heading towards catastrophic levels of warming. Problem is, if we continue pumping all that oil at the rate we currently are? Its no longer going to be catastrophic levels of warming, its going to be ''unlivable for humans'' planetary levels of warming.

Controls for them are not.

😂

So are temperature fluctuations. When you start getting several RAIN days, and week-long thaws, during what used to be the coldest months of winter in Canada (-20 to -30 with the occasional -40) though? You can excuse people for saying ''this isn't normal''.

The problem is that if we continue pumping fossil fuels, at the rates we currently are (which just keeps INCREASING every year)? There will be no way to continue adapting. We are talking human extinction levels of planetary changes.

@@kated3165 Whether that is true or not, there is no way to stop nonwestern countries from continuing to burn fossil fuel. These developing countries are not going to stop or even curb use of fossil fuels. Unlike us, their very survival depends on using them at high rates and they cannot afford environmental controls, equipment, infrastructure.

It costs many times more to "addapt" then it does to effectively move away from fossil fuel . 4 or 5 houses? Almost our entire species lives in coastal areas that would be at risk from a increase in sea level. Green alternatives are for the most part price competitive with fossil fuel and subsidising their transition would be cheaper then cleaning up the mess. Or we could just take all the oil for our selves and ration it...not like any one could really stop us if we reverted back to 19th century brutality

it actually could have been prevented, people jsut ignored the warnings. now we are at the damage control stage.

@@DredZach I mean, wealthy influential countries like the US could have taken the lead in divesting from fossil fuels, and got the ball going worldwide. Then they could have used the trillions they give in subsidies to oil companies and used that money to invest in affordable alternatives and to help poorer countries out. It would only be fair tbh... after all a lot of the poorer countries pollution come from industries built by overseas countries like the US, who go overseas to exploit the cheap labor. I'm not convinced the US is going to divest fully at this point. Even the bulk of industrial agriculture is reliant on oil-based fertilizers and pesticides. Cut those fertilizers out and it's half the crop production right off the bat... and that's not including the increasing pressures of climate change.

Tide goes in, tide goes out. You can't explain it. -- Bill O'Reilly, dumb man among dumb men

Thanks for flex seal

If they're tards explain why. Otherwise you come off as the tard to me and everyone else JJ-uz9vc.