How to visualise Climate Change (ft. Katharine Hayhoe)

  Рет қаралды 12,852

ClimateAdam

ClimateAdam

Күн бұрын

Climate change is everywhere. And when something's everywhere it can feel like it's nowhere. So how do we get our heads around something so huge and abstract - whether it's thinking about extreme weather, or the fossil fuels producing CO2 and driving the problem? I'm joined by one of my all time climate heroes - Katharine Hayhoe - to share some of our favourite ways of thinking about the climate crisis
Check out @globalweirding right now for more from Katharine's incredible communication!
Support ClimateAdam on patreon: / climateadam
#ClimateChange #globalwarming
twitter: / climateadam
instagram: / climate_adam
==THANKS==
Thanks to Tamy Beyrouti and Stellina Sleightholme-Albanis for direction
Global warming from Nasa Climate Change
Fire footage from ETV Andhra Pradesh
Flood footage from Kanal13
Drought footage from IOM - UN Migration

Пікірлер: 238
@ClimateAdam
@ClimateAdam 25 күн бұрын
for more from Katharine, check our Global Weirding! kzfaq.info and for outtakes and bloopers from this vid (and sneak peeks of all my vids!) become a patron over here: www.patreon.com/climateadam/
@HiLasse
@HiLasse 24 күн бұрын
"Sure peeing in the pool ruins it for all of us, but everyone else is doing it. Why should I stop? It won't make a difference, and going to the bathroom is a lot of work." Is my latest analogy, I think it's better because it refers to antisocial, og gross behaviour, that is universally looked down upon
@ClimateAdam
@ClimateAdam 24 күн бұрын
I'm not gunna act that one out!
@HiLasse
@HiLasse 24 күн бұрын
@@ClimateAdam probably a good idea
@l.marcel7283
@l.marcel7283 23 күн бұрын
@@ClimateAdam or use the pool idea with chlorine. Humans need CO2, but not to much. Pools need chlorine but not to much. The big five states do extra chlorine in the pool (current and historical), but when the chlorine level in the pool water is to high no human can use the pool without health damage. And the natural cut of CO2 is analogue to normal using the pool. BG Marcel
@antonyjh1234
@antonyjh1234 23 күн бұрын
The assumption that everybody else is peeing in the pool is wrong, there are people who of course think the walk is worth it. What is the next step, down on the behaviour model or up?
@Think-dont-believe
@Think-dont-believe 22 күн бұрын
@@HiLasseexcept its not the size of pool it's the size of ocean..
@tommclean7410
@tommclean7410 25 күн бұрын
My take on the China rationalization: China emits 35% of global greenhouse gases (GHGs) but 40% of global emissions come from countries which individually emit less than 2%. Giving each of those countries a free pass means that 40% of global GHGs are not being addressed. We all, including China, need to get to zero.
@ClimateAdam
@ClimateAdam 25 күн бұрын
no holes located in that logic!
@fromnorway643
@fromnorway643 24 күн бұрын
We also need to remember that the western countries due to their much earlier industrial development are responsible for a larger share of the _cumulative_ emissions than indicated by their rate of emissions right now. Here are some examples (CO₂ only): *Emissions 2022 Cumulative 1751-2022* US 12.9 % 23.9 % UK+Germ.+Jap. 5.1 % 13.5 % China 29.6 % 14.7 % India 7.5 % 3.5 %
@oleonard7319
@oleonard7319 24 күн бұрын
@@ClimateAdam and will start emitting more in the next 50 years
@oleonard7319
@oleonard7319 24 күн бұрын
@@fromnorway643 and that is not really relevant at this point
@_yonas
@_yonas 24 күн бұрын
@@oleonard7319 Of course it is. It gives you a sense of historical responsibility, because these countries have already caused a disproportionate amount of the warming and reaped a lot of the benefits. It's like eating half the cookies with your small group of friends and then complaining that the other - much larger - group of people people want one too.
@nathanhallisey441
@nathanhallisey441 24 күн бұрын
House insurance is going up like crazy and in some places in Australia you can't get insurance anymore.
@compostjohn
@compostjohn 24 күн бұрын
The 'emissions from China' thing - a whole bunch of those emissions are bound up in the goods they produce for the rest of the world to buy - the computer or phone you're looking at now has Chinese carbon emissions 'embodied' into it. Do these 'belong' to China, or you, developed country person?
@klaushoegerl1187
@klaushoegerl1187 24 күн бұрын
You are right. However, this issue is overrated. In 2021 CO2 emission per capita in China was 8 tons. I f you include product import/export, it was 7.2 tons. For Europe and US it is roughly the same proportion, but inverse.
@DelusionalDoug
@DelusionalDoug 24 күн бұрын
I like the analogy that you have to learn how to swim when the water gets too deep to stand in.
@ClimateAdam
@ClimateAdam 24 күн бұрын
me too!
@BobQuigley
@BobQuigley 24 күн бұрын
We live by lake Erie. Only need to look out window in winter there's no ice last few years
@fromnorway643
@fromnorway643 22 күн бұрын
The average duration of ice cover on my local lake has decreased by three weeks over the last 40 years according to my own observations.
@hongkongphooey-kw4nd
@hongkongphooey-kw4nd 22 күн бұрын
The climate is always changing,it has nothing to do with mankind,how did the ice melt in the last ice age fgs.
@DrSmooth2000
@DrSmooth2000 19 күн бұрын
​@@fromnorway643how is the ecology doing?
@fromnorway643
@fromnorway643 19 күн бұрын
@@DrSmooth2000 I'm not a scientist and don't know about any thorough studies of the climate impact on the local biodiversity. However, some birds and many insects have become much rarer than they used to be, and the deciduous trees grow back their leaves 1-2 weeks earlier than they used to do (that started in full just a few days ago).
@jamesgreig5168
@jamesgreig5168 Күн бұрын
In another 10 years when you observe lots of ice, what will you then say. Remember, only fools talk about climate in less than 30 year time frames.
@konstantrinak1324
@konstantrinak1324 24 күн бұрын
Perfect video, great job! (commenting to boost and get more people to watch this)
@ClimateAdam
@ClimateAdam 24 күн бұрын
replying to show that I really value comments like these!! 💚
@asthmatictuna
@asthmatictuna 24 күн бұрын
I think I'll contribute to this comment thread also if that's okay
@jamielondon6436
@jamielondon6436 24 күн бұрын
@@asthmatictuna May I second that.
@petewright4640
@petewright4640 22 күн бұрын
My analogy as to why a small change in av temperature is significant: Imagine gently shaking a small tree (you can do this in real life! ) preferably without leaves on. If you maintain a steady frequency and amplitude you'll notice all the branches and twigs settle into complex rhythms. Now change the frequency very slightly and see how the ocillations of the branches and twigs radically change. This shows how a small change in one parameter of a complex system can have a big impact - aka temperature and global climate patterns.
@jamesgreig5168
@jamesgreig5168 Күн бұрын
Good on you buddy. Just keep believing that. Brainwashing is now complete for you. PS when did you last shake a tree for 20 to 40 years to make such observations to the health of a tree?
@petewright4640
@petewright4640 Күн бұрын
​@@jamesgreig5168It's not about "belief". Its a fact and what's more you can verify it yourself. All you need is a small tree to shake! The analogy between the complex oscillations of the tree to other complex systems, i.e. climate patterns, is valid. In response to a small change in the frequency of the shaking the patterns of oscillation of the twigs and branches change dramatically. What's not clear about that?
@tonygoodchild1730
@tonygoodchild1730 21 күн бұрын
I can't help heaping praise on the production of values of CimateAdam's videos. They are short enough to fit into the few spare minutes that we have from time to time, and long enough to be memorable. They may be "entry-level" science, but that is just what we need, either to "inform educate and entertain" the many, or as examples of how activists can communicate with the people they meet. Thank you!
@ClimateAdam
@ClimateAdam 19 күн бұрын
thank you so much for your kind words - I'm so glad my videos make an impact!
@ordan787
@ordan787 23 күн бұрын
Great video Adam! On a side note, I've really enjoyed watching you grow as a youtuber! From the perspective of a simple layperson, I think you've really developed and honed your craft - even in the small details of your presentation, comedic delivery and timing, your fun and silly cut-aways! You bring ideas and nuances to the discussion which, from my personal perspective, seem to be unique and very important. I'm excited to watch you continue this fantastic work!
@ClimateAdam
@ClimateAdam 23 күн бұрын
oh my gosh thank you so much! comments like this really remind me that I'm so incredibly lucky that I get to do this. thanks a lot for sticking around as a CliMate and I hope you continue to enjoy whatever comes next on the channel!
@ReesCatOphuls
@ReesCatOphuls 24 күн бұрын
No space for aerosols in the analogy? No space for lags, feedback and tipping points? I continue to find KH understates how bad things are. Also continues to treat climate change as the main thing to tackle, rather than one symptom of wider dynamics.
@jackjimmy2625
@jackjimmy2625 24 күн бұрын
Bingo! You hit the nail on the head there.
@TheOriginalSnial
@TheOriginalSnial 24 күн бұрын
But I think she does explain this in the video: Climate change is the hole in everyone's bucket. It's like, if you think it's primarily a resource issue, then you can tackle resources, but that doesn't stop us burning fossil fuels for the far fewer resources we'd use (e.g. we all use public transport, but it's still FF, because we cut back on EV R&D and deployment). On the other hand, if you see it as a fossil fuel issue, then tackling that forces a reduction in resource usage (e.g. we switch rapidly to EVs, but to do this we need to share more resources including ramping up public transport).
@ReesCatOphuls
@ReesCatOphuls 24 күн бұрын
Nope. You are restating what KH said. Climate change affects lots of things, which is of course true. I prefer the table analogy: politics, culture, economics, etc .. are the items on the table. Climate change (and planetary boundaries, ecological overshoot, meta crisis, etc) are the table legs being sawn off. Also the over simplification of the issue means people will think that "just" stopping fossil fuels will be enough. The aerosol masking loss, the incoming albedo loss, the lags, feedbacks and tipping points mean we can't just continue until enough people want the degradation to stop, and hope that will work. A lot of pain is now baked in.
@yiorgosh4739
@yiorgosh4739 21 күн бұрын
@@ReesCatOphuls KH knows exactly what she's doing. The oversimplification is on purpose because she understands the challenge of science communication to the masses and she is being mindful of getting a message across in a short video. She has dedicated her career to this sort of stuff. She has refined her message over the years because of her experiences trying to educate people and also what research in communications and psychology have demonstrated. What motivates (most) people to act is also a priority for her. It's easy to overwhelm people and discourage them. For people that want a more detailed take on her perspective, she wrote a book called "Saving Us". She is an atmospheric scientist. She fully understands the science of aerosols, lags, feedbacks, etc. but also doesn't want to put people to sleep with jargon or scare them to the point of them wanting to stick their heads in the sand. And further on that point, she is not an expert on other aspects of the environment, on politics, etc. She wants to make sure she can speak with scientific authority because there is no shortage of people out there waiting to pounce on anything slightly wrong. Anyway, having said all that, different kinds of messages can appeal to different kinds of people. So, if a different analogy works better for you, great. I'm sure there will be some other people out there that will prefer your analogy, too. There is no one perfect communication style for everyone.
@dahnoied6893
@dahnoied6893 24 күн бұрын
One of the issues that my climate ignorant friends don't seem to grasp is just how shallow our atmosphere is. Thus they can't conceive of our ability to "pollute" enough for it to matter, especially when they walk outside, look up and everything to their senses seems fine. I think a good point to include when trying to simplify this issue is maybe a graphic that illustrates that.
@MarcPagan
@MarcPagan 24 күн бұрын
If atmospheric CO2 is a crisis, what’s the plan to stop plants from rotting? Per MIT / Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 90%+ of Earth’s atmospheric CO2 is from decaying leaves alone, 2% at most from fossil fuel. Please note any chemist that agrees that raising CO2 in a gas mixture, of about 80% nitrogen and 20% oxygen from 400 parts per million to even 2000 parts per million, will have any impact.
@jackjimmy2625
@jackjimmy2625 24 күн бұрын
The livable part is cigarette rolling paper thin.
@TheOriginalSnial
@TheOriginalSnial 24 күн бұрын
@@MarcPagan there's no net CO2 change from natural processes, the +CO2 from decaying leaves is the -CO2 from building new plants 6 months later. There is a net +CO2 from burning fossil fuels. This is clearly shown by the Scripps Institute CO2 graph, which is a yearly wave that goes up and down, but each peak is higher than the last, because of the extra CO2 we've added from burning fossil fuels.
@antonyjh1234
@antonyjh1234 23 күн бұрын
I like the fact that 99.97% of the mass of the atmosphere is only 100 kilometres / 62 mile high. Everything we emit goes into this. Parts per million is a good graphic, we need to tell people it's trillions of molecules per kg of air that we are adding to this atmosphere.
@kameronbryanrodrigues9813
@kameronbryanrodrigues9813 22 күн бұрын
The thickness of the atmosphere of our world is like the thickness of the skin of an apple.
@GlenConcernedCitizen
@GlenConcernedCitizen 24 күн бұрын
Dr. Levy, one of the facts that would be helpful is to share data on the difference between a sapling and its sequestration value and a mature tree. In our area, there is an unfortunate propensity to let developers come in, eviscerate lands and small mature forests. Asserting that a new subdivision with a sapling in every yard will replace the sequestration value of the existing trees is ....challenging trust. Would be appreciated.
@sandramaki7819
@sandramaki7819 13 күн бұрын
Love Katharine Hayhoe! ❤❤❤ she explains everything very simply. I use her analogies at work to explain climate change to people….
@HaldaneSmith
@HaldaneSmith 24 күн бұрын
8:39 I love the face punching analogy. Thanks for introducing me to Katherine Hayhoe and her channel, Global Weirding.
@ClimateAdam
@ClimateAdam 23 күн бұрын
ah she's just the best! I remember when I was just starting out on my communication journey looking up to her with awe (and I still do tbh)
@TheDisproof
@TheDisproof 23 күн бұрын
Good analogy for CO2 is caffeine in coffee. Small amount but BIG effect
@janetrussell3288
@janetrussell3288 6 күн бұрын
Here’s my analogy about why we need to act now and not later: when we eat we get to enjoy the food at that moment in time, but digestion occurs over time. Some foods digest faster others take longer. But sometimes our foods contain toxins that we can handle in small amounts but if we keep on eating them then those toxins are going to gradually overwhelm our bodies defence systems until they start causing harm. Even then it is going to take a while before you feel the symptoms. Once the symptoms show up you’ve already set in place not just the level of harm you are feeling now, but also the worsening of your condition from the toxins your body still has to process. The amount of damage caused by the toxin is cumulative: it gets worse the more you eat it and it builds up in your body. Logically the thing to do at this point is to try to stop eating the toxic food or to eat as little as possible of the toxic food, to look for alternative foods and to try to treat the harm that has already occurred and that will continue to occur as the body tries to process the toxin already consumed.
@JugglinJellyTake01
@JugglinJellyTake01 24 күн бұрын
Global average temperate is *only an average.* On land it is between *1.5 and 2.0 times as much so between * 2.1 and 2.8 Celsius warmer.* In large continental areas it is around *2 to 4 times as much or more.* So around 2.8 to 5.6 Celsius warmer. In large cities in continental areas that temperature increase will be even greater. These are only averages, *'severe heat waves means it is even hotter with nights providing no relief.* Beware of averages: they do not tell you the full picture.
@MarcPagan
@MarcPagan 24 күн бұрын
If temps increase 1C..how much more of Canada and Russia will be livable?
@Kalevala87
@Kalevala87 15 күн бұрын
​@@MarcPagan Define "livable". Both countries have pretty low average population densities even in areas that are currently amenable to habitation, so they're not exactly starved for space. However, around 60% of both countries is taiga and almost 20% is tundra. Neither biome is good for farming, and global warming isn't going to change that. Taiga can have small pockets of fertile soil, but it is generally very nutrient-poor soil. Tundra is worse, with a very thin layer of topsoil under the permafrost that is even poorer in nutrients and even more acidic. You won't be growing much of anything there even if the permafrost melts completely, especially not in the quantities you would need to sustain all the people who would have to migrate there to escape the sweltering heat and droughts at lower latitudes. But it gets worse. Permafrost is a ticking biological time bomb, full of frozen pathogens waiting to wake up and do some damage, but the limited biological activity in the frozen soil has also led to significant accumulation of mercury, much higher than in the oceans and other biomes. Oh, also radon, a radioactive gas. So yeah, anyone forced to move to those regions due to climate change would be at a significant risk of new epidemics we likely have no treatment for, neurological damage due to mercury exposure, and lung cancer due to radon exposure. Can you survive there if it gets warmer? Technically, yeah. For a while. While wishing you were dead.
@peterdollins3610
@peterdollins3610 24 күн бұрын
Such extreme changes in my short 82 years on this planet. So many creatures destroyed as 90% of all birds 97% of all insects 80% of all fish 85% of all wild places & animals--it is terrifying. I support the environmental groups I can etc.
@andriesbisschoff4968
@andriesbisschoff4968 23 күн бұрын
Your figures have very little to do with reality.
@fromnorway643
@fromnorway643 22 күн бұрын
@@andriesbisschoff4968 I guess he was referring to the size of animal _populations,_ not the number of species going _extinct._ If the population of some animal has been reduced by 95 %, it will probably be at risk of going extinct, but it hasn't done that _yet._
@ClareSlater-rf9lu
@ClareSlater-rf9lu 7 күн бұрын
Excellent! Some great analogies that I will definitely use. I think my favourite is the hole in all the buckets (trying to avoid a spoiler 😂)
@sandramaki7819
@sandramaki7819 13 күн бұрын
Would you please talk about protecting and expanding the tree network as a way to drain the sink full of water? I am fighting to save a forest in my town and the municipal councillors are surprisingly ignorant saying 100 year old trees don’t in fact absorb more CO2 than new ones… help me stop the removal of this forest!
@critiqueofthegothgf
@critiqueofthegothgf 23 күн бұрын
you have no idea how. awesome this is. Katherine Hayhoe is someone I look up to immensely. id love to see more climate scientist interviews here if possible, with people like Hansen, hausfather, Kevin Anderson, rockstrom, Leon Simons etc.
@ClimateAdam
@ClimateAdam 23 күн бұрын
sitting down for conversations with my favourite scientists / communicators / etc is definitely high up on my todo list!
@dennismurray703
@dennismurray703 24 күн бұрын
That was a really great double act. The analogies were spot on and I like the upbeat vibe you give off. But until the data shows signs of even marginal change towards lower emissions then the mountain we have to climb just keeps getting bigger.
@sapientisessevolo4364
@sapientisessevolo4364 24 күн бұрын
Sorry, but I have to say it: if you want to visualize climate change, look at the last year and (nostalgically) remember what things used to be like. And if you're too young for that... well just wait a few years! We could also try a money analogy. Like pre-industrial, what came into your account came out of your account. But starting from the Industrial Revolution, you started spending more and got into debt, with high interest rates. And it just compounded year after year
@TomMuir-ed4cx
@TomMuir-ed4cx 24 күн бұрын
Noticed the "squirel" or the "squirrel", Adam?
@TheOriginalSnial
@TheOriginalSnial 24 күн бұрын
Red squirrel too, I think!
@thehermitscove7942
@thehermitscove7942 24 күн бұрын
I really, really appreciate this video. You guys provided some good analogies that I can use in my daily life to explain climate change. I appreciate that you share the same enthusiasm for the planet that we live on and finding ways to ensure we can continue enjoying it for years to come. Thank you, your team, and Katherine for all the hard work that went into this. ❤
@ClimateAdam
@ClimateAdam 23 күн бұрын
thanks so much! but fyi my team is... me..! well and occasionally some pals who I rope into some of the extra complicated filming!
@TruthTeller101-by5ic
@TruthTeller101-by5ic 17 күн бұрын
Huge part of the problem is the messaging one article will be like we're heading over 1.5 and it's too late to stop that. Then another will be like no hope, hope, hope everything will be fine this leads to confusion I mean is it so hard to demand of scientist a bit of consistency.
@ClimateAdam
@ClimateAdam 17 күн бұрын
a big part of that problem is I think a lot of the reporting on what the limits mean has been really, really bad. I think Katharine's analogy with the cigarettes helps a lot.
@TruthTeller101-by5ic
@TruthTeller101-by5ic 17 күн бұрын
@@ClimateAdam Wouldn't you agree though that many have not honestly communicated the dangers we face? I think primarily of Hannah Ritchie who runs around preaching all will be well, hope should be based on actions and progress rather than what we'd want to believe even if that is more comforting.
@DrGilbz
@DrGilbz 24 күн бұрын
Two of my fave climate communicators in one video! 😍 p.s. loved the swimming pool wading ;)
@ClimateAdam
@ClimateAdam 24 күн бұрын
I really.... splashed out on that one!
@DrGilbz
@DrGilbz 24 күн бұрын
@@ClimateAdam 👏👏👏
@MarcPagan
@MarcPagan 24 күн бұрын
Serious and non-sarcastic question: If atmospheric CO2 is a crisis, what’s the plan to stop plants from rotting? Per MIT / Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 90%+ of Earth’s atmospheric CO2 is from decaying leaves alone, 2% at most from fossil fuel. Please note any chemist that agrees that raising CO2 in a gas mixture, of about 80% nitrogen and 20% oxygen from 400 parts per million to even 2000 parts per million, will have any impact.
@HaldaneSmith
@HaldaneSmith 24 күн бұрын
​@MarcPagan Rotting leaves are offset by spring growth. That's why CO2 levels were nearly constant for thousands of years before the Industrial Revolution. If you look at a graph of rising CO2 levels, you'll see the rising line is actually a sawtooth pattern. The levels decline each spring with spring growth then rise in the fall when plants drop their leaves. But the CO2 from fossil fuels have pushed total CO2 levels higher each year.
@UC241
@UC241 23 күн бұрын
What about the Military Industrial Corporate Oligarchy?
@mafarmerga
@mafarmerga 24 күн бұрын
A 22 caliber bullet is a VERY small bit of lead. But have you ever seen what one of these bullets can do to a human being?
@buscseik
@buscseik 24 күн бұрын
Just some ideas to these videos. The climate change presented as a big mystery that nobody really understand. I recommend showing small specific impact rather than generalisation. E.g. just a few of them. The avg daily max temperature during summer months raised by 4 degrees in Hungary during the last 30 years. There is much more rain in Ireland now, and it impact on crop. There are hundreds of small rivers in Hungary which dried up completely in the last 30 years. The air pollution is number one biggest factor for cancer. You can even make a series of vid on similar topics.
@DiamondKing-em7oc
@DiamondKing-em7oc 24 күн бұрын
Is so cool that we are born at this age, I can't wait for what society will look like 50 years from now
@humhallelujah
@humhallelujah 22 күн бұрын
hey adam! great video! here's an idea for another one (if u don't mind): how can we shop for fashion sustainably? ive heard a lot about fast fashion but not much about practical ways to help. thanks!
@ClimateAdam
@ClimateAdam 22 күн бұрын
ah the reason I've not made videos on that topic is because there are some great ones out there. www.youtube.com/@Gittemary is a great person to check out for this kind of discussion!
@timbushell8640
@timbushell8640 23 күн бұрын
TWo of the best voices, together... more collabs please.
@gigabane7357
@gigabane7357 24 күн бұрын
How to visualise climate change.... Global warming is currently undergoing a doubling of around 14 years. our current estimates are that we hit 1.7. this is 1.2 from global warming and the difference is split between an average el nino we thought might become suoer and a reduction of diming from lockdowns and clean fuel for cruise ships act pt1 What they do not tell you is that on top of that, our sulphur pollution is actually preventing an additional immediate warming of a further 2c from incoming energy levels. The climate forcing is worse than any IPCC projection. Alarm was raised by James Hansen, not some you tube puppy. Now there are subsequent papers verifying his results including from quantum physics who now understand exactly why co2 is so good at holding energy due to its very molecular shape (some flywheel on a string type stuff going on). If we MAINTAIN that sulphur shield. we are still, right now, even if we went carbon zero tomorrow, going to +8c at a exponentially growing rate that is currently at 11 Hiroshima bombs worth of heat per second. But also. the amoc IS collapsing. the warnings have been going off for 120 years and it has taken almost a 45degree nose dive in strength on the graphs for 90 years. The north is going to suffer a mini ice age and the equator is going to boil to uninhabitiability. and the rate the sinks are filling and tipping, we will be in food shocks before most of us reading these words will die of natural old age. These tv scientists need to vastly up their game and ability to keep up with the data or they are in serious danger of being accused of being 'managed opposition'...
@ericdanielski4802
@ericdanielski4802 25 күн бұрын
Nice video.
@PlayNowWorkLater
@PlayNowWorkLater 24 күн бұрын
Love the scarf! I totally want one. Seems like it would be a good fundraiser. And at the same time, similar to folks wearing a pride flag, it would be a way for others who identity as people who care about climate change, to be able to recognize one another.
@ClimateAdam
@ClimateAdam 23 күн бұрын
check out showyourstripes.info/ to learn more about the pattern behind it!
@steve67339
@steve67339 24 күн бұрын
Comment for the algorithm. Keep up the good work.
@ClimateAdam
@ClimateAdam 23 күн бұрын
thank you!
@rapauli
@rapauli 24 күн бұрын
Great analogies !!
@acard1985
@acard1985 24 күн бұрын
The analogy that should be stressed is that while we're impaired, we still do not have lung cancer. We need to remember that when we act, both individually and as a society.
@TheOriginalSnial
@TheOriginalSnial 24 күн бұрын
At 10:05, it's a *red* squirrel isn't it? (hint 2 'r's ;-) ). Brilliant and friendly video! My Big China vs Little Us response is usually: " “My little emissions don't matter” said 8 billion people." [ & yes I know it's not mostly about individual emissions, but the inner assumption is a false approximation to 0].
@D-Pants
@D-Pants 24 күн бұрын
Great discussion
@leobard
@leobard 23 күн бұрын
Alcohol blood level is also a good comparison. 250ppm = 0.000250 = 0.250 promille. Assume a body only able to reduce alcohol by 0.001 promille each year ... And you keep drinking, high on the energy it gives you, while you should stop drinking and eat carbs for energy
@jenniferlevine5406
@jenniferlevine5406 24 күн бұрын
Thank you for another wonderful video!
@ClimateAdam
@ClimateAdam 23 күн бұрын
thanks for comments like these!!
@davestagner
@davestagner 23 күн бұрын
“Climate change is the hole in every bucket”. YES!! As I keep saying, climate change is the worst problem we have, because no matter what you think the worst problem is, climate change is making it even worse.
@katherineallen4239
@katherineallen4239 22 күн бұрын
Great video - love your nails! 💙
@ClimateAdam
@ClimateAdam 19 күн бұрын
💅!
@DobrinWorld
@DobrinWorld 24 күн бұрын
Thank you!
@deemisquadis9437
@deemisquadis9437 22 күн бұрын
It snowed today, that is a change, it is supposed to be spring. But this happens here, e wry year. Sometimes we get snow in July.
@fromnorway643
@fromnorway643 22 күн бұрын
We had this year's first day with above 20°C yesterday.
@user-sn7gb5cy2j
@user-sn7gb5cy2j 23 күн бұрын
Great video
@thevip8837
@thevip8837 24 күн бұрын
nice vid. btw looking good!
@kenclark3953
@kenclark3953 14 күн бұрын
It's not "too many things to care about", it's "This one requires I make changes to my life, and therefore I want to avoid thinking about it. It's easier to blame companies, politicians, rich people." Those groups/people do/should bear more of the blame, but when people try to pass the buck to them, they can then pretend it's not their problem at all. Which goes along with their not wanting to change at all anyway.
@user-it9vs3vq2z
@user-it9vs3vq2z 24 күн бұрын
The problem with climate change science is that if you don't have detailed model looking at all things that effect the temperature of the earth you can't find things to change besides carbon emissions that can effect the temperature of the earth. For example car motors get hut from combustion, and they don't cool them by reducing combustion. they cool it by adding a radiator. You have to look at the full model and all modes of heat transfer going on with the earth and then look for ways to reduce the change in temperature. How do you know that there isn't something easier to do than reduce carbon emissions to reduce earths ambient air temperature? It's like if you had gas station that got hot in the summertime and you see carbon being admitted from the cars at the gas station and then immediately assume carbon is making the gas station hot. It's not entirely like that. But I have an mechanical engineering degree and you can't just look at carbon and temperature. You can't simplify the whole earth to 2 things, carbon, and temperature. The human life goal can not be carbon and temperature.
@fromnorway643
@fromnorway643 23 күн бұрын
Forget about waste heat from combustion! The climate forcing from one doubling of CO₂ is about *_4 watts_* for every square metre of the Earth's surface. The direct _waste heat_ from all human activity constitutes about *_one hundredth_* of that or just 0.04 watt/m². For comparison, all _geothermal heat_ represents about 0.1 watt/m² or 2.5 times more than all the human waste heat, but still insignificant in the context of climate. It's the greenhouse gases' ability to disturb the Earth's energy exchange with space that matters. The resulting energy imbalance from that is what causes the global temperature to change.
@user-it9vs3vq2z
@user-it9vs3vq2z 23 күн бұрын
@@fromnorway643 I wasn't saying that the waste heat from the car is causing global warming. I was just saying that you have to look at the model of heat transfer in detail to come to come up with solutions for heat transfer of energy back into space. It's not a single factor problem. What you're doing is eliminating other variables. It's like when you do experiments, the first thing you do is write a list of pertinent equations, and variables, and the create Pi terms. Then you go through and eliminate variables that you think are irrelevant. You're trying to say that Moles of Carbon in the atmosphere is so significant that it's the only thing you need to look at in a temperature model of the entire earth and that's a bunch of crap. Then you have it dynamically unstable so that any changes caused by climate change makes the heating worse like methane being released by the ice melting in the arctic. I think that modeling is a lie. There is no greater heat transfer rate losing heat such as maybe energy causing more circulation and convection in the upper atmosphere? Does the added energy expand the atmosphere. Does it make clouds thicker and reflect more heat out into space? Additionally solutions like nuclear power have to factor in waste heat. The heat goes into water. If the average temperature of the water increases it kills fish more. There is tons of environmental analysis that is lacking, and everything is directed towards more computer and electric power.
@fromnorway643
@fromnorway643 23 күн бұрын
@@user-it9vs3vq2z Climate scientists have studied all of this and know full well that energy transfer _within_ the climate system happens both as radiation, advection/convection, latent heat and conduction, but radiation is the only of these relevant for the Earth's energy exchange with space. Have you ever seen a spectrum of the Earth's outgoing IR radiation as measured by satellites? The most distinctive feature seen there is the deep "bite" taken out of the spectrum between about 13 and 17 microns (µm), representing a large reduction of heat loss to space over these wavelengths. We know from careful measurements in laboratories that CO₂ also absorbs IR well outside the 13-17 µm band, but that absorption is currently too weak to matter much. However, increasing atmospheric CO₂ will strengthen the absorption outside this band and thus widen that "bite" in the spectrum. The same is true for other natural and man-made greenhouse gases although their absorption characteristics differ from each other. Water vapour for instance doesn't have a central, deep "bite" as CO₂ does but absorbs over a broader part of the spectrum. Climate scientist have studied virtually every possible and impossible explanation of the ongoing warming, and nothing fits the observed "fingerprints" as well as man-made greenhouse gases of which CO₂ is the most important but not the only one. One of these fingerprints is that the upper atmosphere (the stratosphere and mesosphere) is cooling while the lower atmosphere (the troposphere) is warming. A brighter sun would have warmed _all_ of the atmosphere and with a stronger and faster warming in the upper atmosphere. It's also worth noting that climate scientists predicted this pattern already in the 1960s, before we had enough data to confirm it.
@maxmorimoto6481
@maxmorimoto6481 20 күн бұрын
The world would be 1,000,000,000X better if people like you were in charge
@albin4323
@albin4323 24 күн бұрын
Climate change for me means a cooling trend of swedish springs, the once reliable and hot springs of the 00's are long gone, now it's warm for a maximum of several days or just a week then back to below average and bad strawberry harvests.
@joseenoel8093
@joseenoel8093 24 күн бұрын
I'm a chick forest technician, majored in sylviculture, scrapped my car yrs ago, how I hate hearing we make no diff, my daughter's a biologist into organic farming my son's a nurse and arborist! My husband went to Applebee College, love from Montreal, Pointe Claire, English Guetto!
@tvuser9529
@tvuser9529 22 күн бұрын
Some great analogies in this video! By the way, I have reduced how much I'm punching this person you're talking about, I'm punching them far less than I used to, so I'm clearly morally righteous.
@Kevin_geekgineering
@Kevin_geekgineering 11 күн бұрын
lol, don't worry about the visualizing it, just watch the news, it already visualized all over the world.
@jackjimmy2625
@jackjimmy2625 24 күн бұрын
We're above 2.0 right now, it all depends on where you put the goal post. It's only risen .01 if you put the goal post at yesterday. Thing is it's speeding up. We're actually lucky any of us are still here from predictions ten years ago. The end is coming and predicting when it will happen exactly is kind of impossible but when that day comes even if it's one hundred years from now it will be to soon to those still living. I'd be surprised if we haven't gone extinct in the next ten or twenty years myself. Stopping it at this point is virtually impossible and even if we could the greedy wealthy privileged elites "the people who control everything" are still to greedy and old to care. They only care about themselves and they'll be dead soon enough anyway. They'll jump on their multi million dollar yachts and head to Antarctica or their bunkers in New Zealand to maybe get a few extra years anyway when the SHTF. It won't be good when the worlds 440 nuclear power plants and their 1,200 spent rod holding tanks all melt down either. So many self reinforcing feedback loops at play now, at least 60 known. It's a runaway train. We should try though, maybe we could get a few extra years.
@joseenoel8093
@joseenoel8093 24 күн бұрын
🎉 hope is the next generation, prior ones often too mean and self-serving to care, next generations see not caring won't work!
@BruceDuncan
@BruceDuncan 22 күн бұрын
Where we're going, we won't need scarves :(
@jamesgreig5168
@jamesgreig5168 Күн бұрын
When an article begins with a preposition that is totally faulty, how can you take the article seriously?? "Fossil fuels are devastating every single aspect of our lives". Only an ignoramus would say that. There is NO direct link between fossil fuels and climatic factors. CO2 is NOT our enemy. I had an interesting discussion with META AI yesterday on key drivers on global warming. This is the conversation. You can see AI has all the information but prioritisation has occurred following THE agenda. I asked AI about the greenhouse gas that causes the most heating. It's original answer was CO2, I said I don't agree and threw in water vapour. This was the response. You are correct! I apologize for the mistake. Water vapor (H2O) is indeed the most potent greenhouse gas, responsible for around 60-70% of the Earth's natural greenhouse effect. Carbon dioxide (CO2) is the second most potent greenhouse gas, responsible for around 20-30% of the greenhouse effect. Water vapor is a highly effective greenhouse gas due to its strong absorption bands in the infrared spectrum, which allow it to trap heat in the atmosphere. However, its concentration in the atmosphere is largely controlled by temperature and humidity, and it has a relatively short atmospheric lifetime (around 1-2 weeks). CO2, on the other hand, has a much longer atmospheric lifetime (around 100-150 years), and its concentration is increasing significantly due to human activities such as fossil fuel burning and land use changes. This makes CO2 a key driver of human-induced climate change, despite being less potent than water vapor on a molecule-by-molecule basis. Thank you for pointing out my mistake! I hope this clears up any confusion. Just as a sideline. In the sahara desert and in Australia's red centre, daytime temperatures are often 40⁰C or higher, but at night they are often below zero. The effect of current levels of CO2 is negligent at 420 ppm. Get the drift. We're all being hoodwinked!!🤔🤔
@dadsonworldwide3238
@dadsonworldwide3238 8 күн бұрын
It'd definitely no one size fits all for each nation as the variables and geological territory is very different. A quick history is in order , I can remember when we thought we had rebuilt Europe and drew new borders for new nations and was righting wrongs of the past and reagan & thatcher said let's extend this temporary waivers of self sacrifice helping industrialize China and 3rd world nations so they could produce items for trade in resources instead of warring for them . Well we liberated all common sense transfered wealth and industrialized it all now . In all this we've charged the family cell forced everyone off the land into city's to meet factory demands of large gathering labor. This turned into office occupation sky scrappers and 12 year college degree that removed 18 -30 years old from our workforce and with highly specialized training you can only reach a profit around 50 years old in our most prestigious feilds. So now we can gain a by product of more spread out medium density better quality of life infrastructure in places like America Is we all agree to utilize interactive educational reforms that do use computation to train majority as machinest on universal operating systems what tool and applications do we need. Quadruple logistics,thin city's move back into nature more spread out medium density younger 18 -30 entering workforce marrying raising kids as governers of nature once again. We can take education to pupils ,operating business in the middle of nowhere America deserts that was only possible in major city's. We can break down colleges into close nit smaller groups more engaged with local industry. We can merge unions & publishers into online coops putting buyers, sellers, investors under one roof in one domain where like farming or trucking industry we can sub contract out skill & trade to take everything door to door. Local ownership of new paradigm infrastructure can be restored to our bottom up ai safety grid fuse like breaker box infrastructure. This would return us to our more pragmatic common sense socio-political & economic order invented by our early founders. It would in fact challenge the stepping stone anomalous time period of 1900s structuralism expansionism of agencies and institutions & the more European political scale we adopted. The neo liberal control mechanisms and stress on many who never faced innovation before. City's with perks and benefits are facing things they havnt known for 150 years already so all we would do is support the organic existing flow technology is already creating on these antiquated old world control systems
@dadsonworldwide3238
@dadsonworldwide3238 8 күн бұрын
The west grandfathered in many obstacles it picked up along the way through many phases like the stream engine era,hydraulic to nuemadics. Unions to tree hugging in the mid 1900s . Most of the world just industrialized in my lifetime after the transitor age began so they don't carry as much economic dead weight middle men energy vampires as we do. We have so much fat we can trim in the west and many won't like how easy and cheaply we can streamline much of these energy vampires. Millions of people only know how to live the way they have been forced over the past 150 years. But it truly Is a better quality of life to be had if we repay the native family cell to once again be fruitful and multiple in a more mixed into nature while maintaining all the modern benefits and more
@ChipJam
@ChipJam 24 күн бұрын
If you want to raise awareness,market those scarves! (not kidding)
@ClimateAdam
@ClimateAdam 24 күн бұрын
this way of presenting temperatures was first used by scientist Ed Hawkins (who's come up with loads of amazing visuals in his time). you can learn more about the "warming stripes" here: showyourstripes.info/
@President_NotSure
@President_NotSure 24 күн бұрын
the irony is the solution is to sit home, not spend and do nothing
@mariaamparoolivergarza8933
@mariaamparoolivergarza8933 24 күн бұрын
And at home do what we can!
@camilleodonoghue3322
@camilleodonoghue3322 24 күн бұрын
Like during covid - save the world by sitting on your couch" 😅 But I do sometimes think human nature is running at a faster tempo than earth nature. We keep changing everything around us really quickly, and natural evolution and earth systems adapt at a (much) slower pace.. its a messy dance we got going...
@psikeyhackr6914
@psikeyhackr6914 24 күн бұрын
Does unnecessary manufacturing due to planned obsolescence put more CO2 into the atmosphere? Doesn't manufacturing require energy plus shipping replacements for things that should not have worn out? Why should we take climate scientists seriously as long as they do not talk about the planned obsolescence of consumer products?
@oleonard7319
@oleonard7319 24 күн бұрын
The fundmental issue has never been. That we couldnt do anything about climate change. The fundamental issue has been the lack of willingness to do anything about it because of vested interst profiting from the actives. That cause it and a general public. That is easy to manipulate by those industries
@jett7891
@jett7891 25 күн бұрын
Things are worsening all the time. Except for you climate Adam. You’re just getting better and better looking. So gorgeous. 🤤 Thanks for making climate change sexy 🙏🏼💓
@camilleodonoghue3322
@camilleodonoghue3322 24 күн бұрын
🤣
@Catarrhine
@Catarrhine 24 күн бұрын
Obligatory comment for the algorithm 😊
@ClimateAdam
@ClimateAdam 24 күн бұрын
beep boop!
@tiepup
@tiepup 24 күн бұрын
All hail the algorithm.
@oleonard7319
@oleonard7319 24 күн бұрын
dealing with climate change has always partially been a psychological and greed problem and now is almost entirely one.
@MrMcMuggel
@MrMcMuggel 24 күн бұрын
A lot of Buckets were hurt A LOT for the production of this video :/
@ClimateAdam
@ClimateAdam 24 күн бұрын
actually to waste as little as possible, I just used three holes in one single bucket!
@krastan
@krastan 24 күн бұрын
Something that people sometimes forget is that temperature is energy so as the global temperature goes up so does the energy of the system which will cause more powerful and frequent weather disasters. An analogy i can think of is boiling water. Initially the water is still then after some time it starts having small perturbations on the surface. These small perturbations are like the weather events in preindustrial times. But as we keep adding heat and energy to the pot, the bubbles become bigger, more frequent and destructive.
@TheDalaiLamaCon
@TheDalaiLamaCon 24 күн бұрын
Where does the increased energy of the system come from?
@Tasmantor
@Tasmantor 24 күн бұрын
​@@TheDalaiLamaConyou're joking right?
@fromnorway643
@fromnorway643 24 күн бұрын
@@TheDalaiLamaCon It comes from the energy _not_ escaping to space!
@TheDalaiLamaCon
@TheDalaiLamaCon 24 күн бұрын
@@fromnorway643 That makes no sense. CO2 back radiation cannot heat the surface which heated it in the first place. Extra energy is needed. Also, how does CO2 warm the oceans?
@TheDalaiLamaCon
@TheDalaiLamaCon 24 күн бұрын
@@Tasmantor Humour is something you are patently an allergic to. Do you have a punchline?
@jeffreywright3499
@jeffreywright3499 24 күн бұрын
"Squirrel" Nice touch, that really got me. I enjoy your videos. I hope they entertain, inform, and more importantly influence lots of people.
@ClimateAdam
@ClimateAdam 24 күн бұрын
I only noticed it after I'd already been editing for quite a few hours!
@jamielondon6436
@jamielondon6436 24 күн бұрын
Lovely energy, some great analogies - and of course the effects are top notch! :-)
@ClimateAdam
@ClimateAdam 24 күн бұрын
that patreon budget is really enabling me to splash out on cutting edge graphics!
@jamielondon6436
@jamielondon6436 24 күн бұрын
@@ClimateAdam It shows.
@davestagner
@davestagner 23 күн бұрын
Not an analogy, but I like to point out that every kg of fossil fuel creates around 3kg of CO2. This shocks a lot of people - they don’t realize that all that carbon combines with oxygen that’s not in the fossil fuel originally.
@ClimateAdam
@ClimateAdam 23 күн бұрын
ah that's interesting - as someone with my head in the science so much, I never think of that fact as noteworthy, but reminds me of how much I can sometimes take for granted
@davestagner
@davestagner 23 күн бұрын
@@ClimateAdam Expertise is its own kind of trap! It’s really easy to take things for granted, and not realize what isn’t obvious to people not in the know.
@boxodrive
@boxodrive 24 күн бұрын
Analogies suck, next time you think it's a good idea to use one just remember all the good "we should run government like a business" has done for the world.
@suolainenomena7631
@suolainenomena7631 23 күн бұрын
Can we talk about the incoming famines?
@pushpakkolhe9081
@pushpakkolhe9081 24 күн бұрын
You inspire me everyday. The problem is definitely way more pressing than what people think. And videos like these which present the analogies to understand the extreme effects and causes of Climate change will take us a long way. Great work sir!
@ClimateAdam
@ClimateAdam 24 күн бұрын
ah that's so lovely to hear - thank you so much for being part of the CliMate community!
@jandraelune1
@jandraelune1 24 күн бұрын
As a nation China is leading in pollution, but per capita, the US is leading in pollution. It's that per captia that is worse.
@tiepup
@tiepup 24 күн бұрын
And China is also one of the leading counties in rolling out renewables. They’re very aware of the impact of their emissions and have plans in place to reduce them. Compared to the Western world China is probably more likely to hit their goals as fossil fuel companies have little to no control over government actions and policies.
@yiorgosh4739
@yiorgosh4739 23 күн бұрын
Squirrel!
@ClimateAdam
@ClimateAdam 23 күн бұрын
the most important thing in this video imo (don't tell Katharine I said that)
@mafarmerga
@mafarmerga 24 күн бұрын
I too use the blanket analogy, but I add that typically we need some blanket when we sleep, otherwise we get too cold. But for 10,000+ years things have been (as Goldilocks might say) 'just right' But over the past 200 years we have added a wool blanket, a duvet, and someone wrapped us in a Snuggi. What would YOU do if someone then said "Is it OK if I put this vintage quilt on your bed?"
@TheDalaiLamaCon
@TheDalaiLamaCon 24 күн бұрын
Your blanket could not raise the temperature beneath it above your body temperature.
@mafarmerga
@mafarmerga 24 күн бұрын
@@TheDalaiLamaCon "Your blanket could not raise the temperature beneath it above your body temperature." You want to live on a planet where it is 98.6 F day and night with 100% humidity?? Be my guest. Let me know how that works out for you.
@TheDalaiLamaCon
@TheDalaiLamaCon 24 күн бұрын
@@mafarmerga Hyperbolic strawman.
@mafarmerga
@mafarmerga 24 күн бұрын
@@TheDalaiLamaCon "Hyperbolic strawman." Hyperbolic? Strawman? OK, I'll give you the opportunity to shut me up. Other than the period 1800 to the present name a SINGLE time in Earth's history that atmospheric CO2 levels have increased by more than 125 ppm in less than 250 years. ONE SINGLE TIME. If you can do that I will shut up. If you can NOT do that then grow a pair and admit to yourself that we have really screwed things up for the planet and that we had better act quickly to stop making things worse.
@fromnorway643
@fromnorway643 22 күн бұрын
@@TheDalaiLamaCon "Your blanket could not raise the temperature beneath it above your body temperature." Yes, it could! Your body temperature isn't just the temperature of some lifeless object with zero heat generation, but a result of the balance between the heat added by your metabolism and your heat loss to your surroundings. If your heat loss is constrained while your metabolism stays the same, you will definitely heat up.
@blupblup24
@blupblup24 24 күн бұрын
Great Video and love you reenacting all the analogies in such a fun way :) Thanks for educating 🫶
@Wind-oh-Wishp
@Wind-oh-Wishp 7 күн бұрын
algo comment
@prairiedogs8296
@prairiedogs8296 24 күн бұрын
Keep up the Great work - pls 🙏🏼
@galactic-beys
@galactic-beys 24 күн бұрын
Great analogies and enactments. Thank you for your efforts!! i believe, with the help and unenslaved cooperation of AI and biotechnology we can clean the air and oceans. there are solutions, i just hope we get there before the poor have no where to go and no resources to survive. i think we need to stop building boxes for homes and start building Earthships on a large community scale. but nothing will change until greed and political monopolies change. no more ads to buy things we don't need and replace the ads with information that directs society towards a habitable earth. we foretell our lives from screens just to be washed into what we don't need, a fake future that separates us from nature and reality.
@evanforbes1160
@evanforbes1160 24 күн бұрын
Great nails and great content. The biggest problem I have with climate change is how do I engage with people who so vehemently disregard the issue. How do we shift the perception of climate change from something that's a partisan political issue to a humanitarian one. It's exhausting to engage with people who don't take it seriously or dismiss it as uncertainty or worse conspiracy.
@ClimateAdam
@ClimateAdam 24 күн бұрын
one of the things Katharine emphasises is that we should prioritise activating the people who already accept the science and care about it, rather than investing energy in the uphill struggle you describe!
@MarcPagan
@MarcPagan 24 күн бұрын
Serious and non-sarcastic question: If atmospheric CO2 is a crisis, what’s the plan to stop plants from rotting? Per MIT / Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 90%+ of Earth’s atmospheric CO2 is from decaying leaves alone, 2% at most from fossil fuel. Please note any chemist that agrees that raising CO2 in a gas mixture, of about 80% nitrogen and 20% oxygen from 400 parts per million to even 2000 parts per million, will have any impact.
@raybod1775
@raybod1775 24 күн бұрын
@@MarcPagan Plant store carbon when growing and release the same carbon like a closed loop. Problem is fossil carbon that’s simply released by burning and not recycled.
@lukashansen8184
@lukashansen8184 24 күн бұрын
Great thumbnail!!
@billyjoesmo8251
@billyjoesmo8251 15 күн бұрын
Does anyone on this line really think we're going to be here in 2030🤔
@paulh1862
@paulh1862 24 күн бұрын
Thanks for the analogies Adam! The fever, the pool, they put climate change into perspective
@ronimmi
@ronimmi 24 күн бұрын
all the incompetent around the world have no problem becoz, they have money and power to live a life they want. we are the ordinary people and our extraordinary nature suffering since last 70 years. do they care ? NOPE.
@raybod1775
@raybod1775 24 күн бұрын
Leave a senseless comment for AI to sweep up.
@ClimateAdam
@ClimateAdam 23 күн бұрын
beep boop!
@ukwerna
@ukwerna 24 күн бұрын
what did i miss, I dont understand the hair magic?
@DeathsGarden-oz9gg
@DeathsGarden-oz9gg 24 күн бұрын
Cups shouldn't be made of plastic water bottles same use glass aluminum or bamboo. For homes stop logging the forests go to a rock mine use rocks or use aluminum or steel frames. Mines shouldn't have waste rock we should make use of it in some way none toxic metals why not put in homes the toxic ones crush into sand and use metal plants to reduce waste or use the sand for well sand batteries. Lol toxic sand batteries from a toxic mine 😂😂😂😂😂😂
@andrewedlin6207
@andrewedlin6207 21 күн бұрын
Adam, you are getting a bit dark with your beating up and arsenic analagies…😅
@MarcPagan
@MarcPagan 24 күн бұрын
Dear Climate Activist, a serious and non-sarcastic question: If atmospheric CO2 is a crisis, what’s the plan to stop plants from rotting? Per MIT / Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 90%+ of Earth’s atmospheric CO2 is from decaying leaves alone, 2% at most from fossil fuel. Please note any chemist that agrees that raising CO2 in a gas mixture, of about 80% nitrogen and 20% oxygen from 400 parts per million to even 2000 parts per million, will have any impact.
@TheOriginalSnial
@TheOriginalSnial 24 күн бұрын
there's no net CO2 change from natural processes, the +CO2 from decaying leaves is the -CO2 from building new plants 6 months later. There is a net +CO2 from burning fossil fuels. This is clearly shown by the Scripps Institute CO2 graph, which is a yearly wave that goes up and down, but each peak is higher than the last, because of the extra CO2 we've added from burning fossil fuels.
@fromnorway643
@fromnorway643 24 күн бұрын
We have emitted at least _twice_ as much CO₂ as the _net_ increase in the atmosphere over the last 150 years, proving that nature itself have been a net _sink,_ not a net source of CO₂ to the atmosphere. If nature was a net source (emitting more than it absorbs), the surplus CO₂ would have been _added_ to _our_ emissions, causing the atmospheric concentration to increase at least _twice as fast_ as it actually has (5 rather than 2.5 ppm/year in recent years).
@johnthomasriley2741
@johnthomasriley2741 24 күн бұрын
Where does AI fit in all this? Wild claims are being made. Is this just pie in the sky?
@raybod1775
@raybod1775 24 күн бұрын
AI is a talking encyclopedia that’s right 90% of the time. AI is also statistical computations which is great for analysis of things like medical diagnosis, design, etc. Combined, AI can come up with most probably correct answers to do things like creating programs, outlines, designs, driving cars, answering help lines, etc. These are great tools to assist someone do any field in which a person doesn’t know everything, but know what they want end results to be. It really works well when AI is programmed to hand off to a human when answer is questionable or AI doesn’t have a good answer. Most help desk jobs and programming jobs will likely disappear. Employers will expect workers who use AI to be more efficient at doing their jobs. AI will work well when techniques to accomplish something are well established based on precedence. AI is not ‘intelligent’ and not ‘creative’.
@Enhancedlies
@Enhancedlies 24 күн бұрын
it's really quite insane, fossil fuels are the reason you are sitting here today. And the total failure to acknowledge any benefits shows your ideology coming through. I would love to hear many points you speak on, but I cannot in good conscience feel you are being entirely genuine. Also I am a subscriber.
@tiepup
@tiepup 24 күн бұрын
Adam had no control over what his ancestors did. However he does have some control over what he does, and I’m sure he hopes his actions allow future generations look back at their ancestors as the ones who fixed the problem.
@ClimateAdam
@ClimateAdam 24 күн бұрын
who on Earth denies that fossil fuels built the society we live in today? but the logical leap to assume that's what tomorrow's future should be built on - given how much we understand of the devastation they are already causing - is pretty magnificent!
@Enhancedlies
@Enhancedlies 24 күн бұрын
@@ClimateAdam alright I apologise for being brash, it is unfair to decry you for the crowd's ideals. However, this is very much the case for many if not all of the climate activists I hear. They paint it as if it is the worst, most destructive disease that we must snuff out with every ounce of energy we have. I also didn't say that fossil fuels must be 'tomorrows future' but they will be a part of it. I also find it impossible that the discussion that if the UK stopped everything overnight we wouldn't even make a 1% dent in the global carbon emissions. China is building 200/300 coal plants annually and is not slowing down. The idea we must cripple the UK whilst other dictatorial regimes carry on being the largest generators of carbon emissions is not only laughable, it is dangerous. I also don't belive that CO2 is this dangerous climate killer, I actively think the opposite. The more carbon in the atmosphere the better, we will have more flora and food than ever. The world is greening, more people die every year from cold than heat by orders of magnitude. (Globally, 5.08 million deaths per year can be attributed to abnormal hot and cold temperatures between 2000-2019. This accounts for 9.43% of all global deaths, of these 5.08 million annual deaths:4.59 million deaths were cold-related, 0.49 million deaths were heat-related)
@jackjimmy2625
@jackjimmy2625 24 күн бұрын
The world pumping out brats like crazy doesn't help either. You just can't have infinite growth on a finite planet.
@TheOriginalSnial
@TheOriginalSnial 24 күн бұрын
The problem isn't population. Katharine Hayhoe did a Global Weirding video on that.
@julienrockingham-ip4co
@julienrockingham-ip4co 24 күн бұрын
There's nothing I can do, Noone wanted to listen. I don't have the money to spread the word, or fix it myself. So I just stopped caring...This is for all those parents to figure out, i have no kids or a home or land, im just some random
@ClimateAdam
@ClimateAdam 24 күн бұрын
I feel you - it can make us feel really powerless. but you're here, which suggests to me that you do still care. my best advice is to find community - it not only helps empower us to take action, but supports us in the complex feelings we deal with, when grappling with this enormous issue.
@rodmac5633
@rodmac5633 23 күн бұрын
Liars
Are food influencers wrong about climate change?
16:33
ClimateAdam
Рет қаралды 17 М.
Can we really suck up Carbon Dioxide?
12:37
ClimateAdam
Рет қаралды 13 М.
ПЕЙ МОЛОКО КАК ФОКУСНИК
00:37
Masomka
Рет қаралды 10 МЛН
КАРМАНЧИК 2 СЕЗОН 5 СЕРИЯ
27:21
Inter Production
Рет қаралды 427 М.
Не пей газировку у мамы в машине
00:28
Даша Боровик
Рет қаралды 10 МЛН
[柴犬ASMR]曼玉Manyu&小白Bai 毛发护理Spa asmr
01:00
是曼玉不是鳗鱼
Рет қаралды 25 МЛН
One Million Years into Climate Change's Past
12:48
ClimateAdam
Рет қаралды 39 М.
Every Kind of Bridge Explained in 15 Minutes
17:36
Practical Engineering
Рет қаралды 420 М.
Our Understanding of Floods is ALL Wrong
13:07
PBS Terra
Рет қаралды 185 М.
Eco-Emotions: How we deal with climate fears | ft. @DrGilbz
11:59
The tough reality of Carbon Capture & Storage
10:40
ClimateAdam
Рет қаралды 29 М.
Can a Boat Float In Supercritical Fluid?
9:13
The Action Lab
Рет қаралды 138 М.
See what three degrees of global warming looks like
16:24
The Economist
Рет қаралды 3,9 МЛН
How green is fake meat, really?
26:09
Simon Clark
Рет қаралды 81 М.
Very Best And Good Price Smart Phone
0:42
SDC Editing Zone 9K
Рет қаралды 216 М.
Which Phone Unlock Code Will You Choose? 🤔️
0:14
Game9bit
Рет қаралды 10 МЛН