stop stealing hinduism, judeochristian

typical judeochrsitian behavior. steal from hinduism the essence of anti materialism and have the jewish lady apply it to find a way to make money. You probably think you know god. so pathetic.

Sure, head to: cymaticslab.com/ :)

Never mind I saw your response on another comment. This is fascinating!

Hi Gretchen The frequencies follow: A note -1 octave below A 432 HZ (or 432 HZ tuning)= 216 HZ F note (432 HZ tuning) = 342.879 HZ F note (440 HZ tunning) = 349.228 HZ Sun Gong B1 - 126.22 HZ

Hi Tanya, the bowls in this video were purchased from a local dealer who no longer supplies them, but I'm sure you can find them on the internet. In terms of the frequency, this relates to the number of waves produced by the bowl per second. 440 Hz is the most common as most modern music is tuned to 440 Hz. A 432 Hz bowl will sound almost a semitone lower than 440 Hz. There is a lot of information and disinformation on the internet about this so best do your own research and choose whatever you are drawn to. Enjoy

Actually it would only be 8 ct lower. To be a semi tone lower it should be 100ct lower, or 415.3hz

I was thinking the same thing.

Thank you for watching, when focusing on 440 Vs 432, a lot of people often overlook or forget that a piece of music contains a vast number of notes and tones that each have their own frequency / vibration, so whether one tunes to A 440 or A 432 to record a song, it is almost irrelevant as the note A is only one note of many, and for sure a song recorded with an A 432 tuning will most probably contain vibrations of 440 anyway as it is approximately 1 semitone higher, or A#. If, on the other hand, one chose to constantly listen to one constant vibration for a long period of time, then it would be relevant to study the effect of that particular vibration. Like your idea of measuring a word, I’ll certainly experiment with that and will post a video with the results - thanks.

@@treemendushealth2634 cool thanks for the reply, i'm looking forward to the results with different words, itd be cool to see the same words in different languages too, to see if the results are the same or not

@@treemendushealth2634 I'm back again, did you by chance ever get a chance to try measuring with words at all? I'm still curious to see what the results would be

@@sulkoma Hi, thank you for the reminder, I totally forgot. Will be demonstrating it in September so will try it then👍

@@treemendushealth2634 cool, i'm excited to see the results. Hopefully I don't forget to check back here to see how it goes Have a good day

Just experiment, every frequency has its own signature.

Thank you HyperNova, certainly not intended to be deceptive. Looks like we are both going in the same direction and I'm looking forward to seeing your video. I agree that if the plate had different properties the shapes would vary, I'm pleased you mentioned that. I've seen videos where the creator has presented harmonious patters in 432 and chaotic patters in 440 and drawn a conclusion that 440 is dissident etc. My film was intended to debunk that. I feel those videos are deceptive. I do however disagree that tuning to 432hz sounds pretty bad. Certainly when one is accustomed to listening to music in 440hz and you tune down to 432hz, it sounds wrong, but this is is only a temporary effect. The listener soon becomes accustomed to the altered pitch and unfamiliar music sounds perfectly fine. For anyone who wishes to try this experiment, simply download a good player with pitch control on your phone and play a familiar and unfamiliar song while altering the pitch ( try 430hz Vienna, 435 Dresden opera house, 444hz Munich orchestra). Or just play with the speed control on your vinyl record turntable. Enjoy 😀

@@treemendushealth2634 Yeah, I didn't intend to claim that you're intentionally misleading anyone -- it's a very tricky concept with lots of variables to wrap your head around... And that goes double for the way we perceive the sound itself: What you're saying about 432 sounding bad only because we're not used to it is overlooking the fact that simply tuning down from 440 is not a mathematically precise way of reaching what all the 432hz adherents claim. It would take a lot of space to explain this in a youtube comment, and I obviously can't let you HEAR an example by typing it... But if you haven't seen it, I would again recommend Adam Neely's videos -- he's made at least 3 on this subject, but one of them has a thumbnail that says something like "432hz sounds kinda... bad, tbh." He tests out a lot of variations, shows how awful most of them sound (tho a few are kind of interesting), and explains why the thinking behind the whole 432hz movement is completely flawed from top to bottom... Literally EVERYTHING about it is kind of wrong, but the movement persists because most people don't understand the basic concept that tuning something lower -- by almost any amount -- makes it sound warmer, softer, and more supportive... That's simply how we perceive bass frequencies in contrast to treble. Obviously there's a LOT more to it, which is why I'm making a video to cover as many topics as possible. I did the same thing with the ridiculous "flat earth" movement years ago, because it's fascinating how we can make something so wrong sound so convincing, lol. Correcting all the subtle mistakes can take a ton of in-depth research, which the average person just isn't going to do themselves. Sometimes I wish I hadn't bothered with it myself, because it took a LOT of time, lol.

Hi @@HyperNova137 I just watched Adam’s A = 432Hz video and agree with almost everything he said. Except, part of the section on Pythagorean tuning, perhaps this is why you thought A-432 was bad to listen to. It’s not. This is evidenced in Adam’s own video when he points out Placido Domingo felt it would have been better to sing La Scala in 432. I think it’s well known Pythagorean tuning has its shortcomings, but Adam's example connecting Pythagorean tuning to A-432 and demonstrating the out-of-tune wolf interval is flawed and misleading. The Pythagorean interval would sound just as bad if A were tuned to 440 in this example. Pythagorean tuning is completely different to our current scale and has nothing to do with the frequency one tunes A. Either way, pleased we are all debunking the same nonsense, looking forward to your video. Happy to discuss further of line if you wish.

@@treemendushealth2634 Every scale has its quirks and shortcomings, but the bigger point is that the numbers / math attached to them are in a sense completely meaningless, so ultimately we should be using whatever works best for the song we're playing; A bright painting isn't better than a dark one -- what matters is how the artist used them to convey something meaningful. Anyone who experiments with 432 enough will probably notice that some songs sound better with it, while others sound worse... That doesn't mean that the frequencies are good or bad, it's just a result of how they're being used. There are literally TENS OF THOUSANDS of middle eastern scales, microtonal scales, etc, and there have been a lot of beautiful songs written with intentionally dissonant tunings and intervals; Even so-called "bad frequencies" can be put to creative use by people brave enough to "think outside the box," and everyone will have their own unique reaction to it depending on the context, personal preference, and a long list of other factors. And even if 432 really was some magical healing frequency, curiosity would still drive some people to use other tunings (including 440) just to hear something different.

Thanks for your comment and thoughts Peter. Maybe you know more about this than I do but I'm confident our cells have a vibration and they are for sure moving about. You can see for yourself during a live blood analysis, even out of the body everything is moving on the slide under the microscope🙂

LOL

Thank you for your thoughts, B. I'd recommend checking out the scientific studies documented in The Tao of Sound: Acoustic Sound Healing for the 21st Century Board book by Fabien Maman and Terres Unsoeld. Here you will see first hand how cells react to 440Hz. For sure one of my favorite books.