Liverpool's kop has way too much history to moved to another stadium altogether. Anyway the redevelopment is done

You simply cannot compare Spurs with Chelsea when it comes to building a new stadium. Chelsea are situated in an area of London where property & land is among the most expensive in the country. For many years everybody was adamant a 60,000 stadium simply couldn't be built on the 12.5 acres of Stamford Bridge (SB). The ground is hemmed in by London underground track on one side, railway track on another side, & all spectators have to exit from the stadium onto one road, the Fulham Rd. Then Abramovich found architects that managed to design a 60,000 stadium on the current site. If the UK government hadn't revoked Abramovich's business visa in 2017 then Chelsea would today be playing in their brand new 60,000 seater stadium. The two forms of planning permission had been granted, every issue with the railways had been sorted, there was just a right-of-light issue with two local residents to sort out & an agreement with Wembley to play there for three, possibly four, seasons to be finalised. Anyway, we are where we are. A new stadium on the site of SB will cost the new owners as much as £2 billion. One positive is the club has been successful in purchasing 2.5 acres of extra land immediately adjacent to the west side of the stadium at a cost of £80m. Another positive factor is how both the local council & the London Mayor are both very supportive of Chelsea building a new stadium. Without their support it would be almost impossible to stay at SB.

Bullshit, before abramovich, chelski were bankrupt, and I can remember evening cup games at Stamford bridge entertaining 12,000 fans. A long way short.

@@lauriewright388 What is? Exactly what did I say that is bullshit? The answer....nothing. Every word I said about Abramovich & his proposed new stadium is 100% true & accurate. What I said about the 12.5 acre site of Stamford Bridge is correct, what I said about the new stadium plans under Abramovich are correct, what I said about the railway lines & what I said about the Mayor's office & the local council is correct. And no, Chelsea were not bankrupt & not even close to being bankrupt just prior to Abramovich arriving in 2003. It is true the club was in a difficult financial situation & they were no longer in a position to spend the kind of money they had been doing for the previous 6 or 7 years. In summer 2002 the club couldn't afford to spend any money on new players & were only able to bring one player in on a loan. However, in that summer of 2002 Barcelona were pushing hard to get Chelsea to sell Hasselbaink for £20m. But Ken Bates refused to sell him. What's more they hadn't been forced to sell any of their players prior to Abramovich arriving. Don't you think that if the club was facing bankruptcy they would have been forced to sell some players to raise some cash? If they were facing bankruptcy then Bates would have sold Hasselbaink for the £20m Barcelona were offering. It's simple logic. 12,000 fans at the Bridge? Yeah, that's right. In fact 12,000 was the average attendance in 1982/83. That's the lowest in Chelsea's history. 12,000 is small, I grant you, but at least it's three times bigger than Arsenal's smallest average attendance for a season. In fact Arsenal had 2 seasons with an average of 4,000 & a whole decade of never getting more than 10,000 average. Man Utd also had seasons where they averaged 4,000 & whole decades of not getting more than an average of 7,000. Liverpool once averaged 5,000 over a season. Spurs once averaged 13,000 over a whole season. Finally....Chelsea have had 12 separate seasons where they had the biggest support in the country, the biggest average gate. Only 4 other clubs have had more than 12 seasons with the biggest support in the country. Oh, & Arsenal literally did go into bankruptcy during their history whereas Chelsea never have.

Why not Chelsea share with Twickenham. Build a 100k football and rugby super stadium.

Great comments and I think like you

If he gets his fingers out of the day to day (which it looks like he has been credit to him), he is actually a VERY good chairman and owner. I'd rather a local boy and a lifelong Spurs fan who has been a fan longer than I have been alive, own the club, rather than some oil money or investor who will use the club as either an ego statement or an ATM.

@@JC-kz3ut Daniel Levy doesn't own Spurs, Joe Lewis & ENIC do. As a Chelsea fan I used to love the fact we'd see our club owner, Abramovich, at almost every game & even academy games. There's nothing like having an owner who is owning the club for no other reason than he loves doing it. There's no worrying the owner might want to milk the club one day, no worrying that the club puts money above everything else. Since Abramovich left in 2022 people have realised just what Abramovich did for Chelsea & just how lucky the Chelsea fans were to have him for 2 decades.

@@danniwilder2198 Joe Lewis is in a bit of trouble in America but I’m sure he wouldn’t show his face

Thank you! 😁🙏🏽

How many trophies?

@@TheKicksBoy 26

@@TheKicksBoynice try, but maybe gain some knowledge first…

Lol….coys

What a perspective. Great opinion. Never thought of the other side to be honest.

Turning down those club because they can’t guarantee game time for rising stars don’t mean they won’t join those club in the future

Key point. Poor working class football fans have no idea how to run a club, or finances. A businessman like levy does. Class, training, education and vision are elements in success for a reason.

Thank you! 😁🙏🏽

Thank you so much! 😁🙏🏽

You just never know what's around the corner in this life. For example, didn't the Spurs owner & boss of ENIC recently get criminally indicted in America? I haven't got a clue whether whatever happens to him will affect Spurs or not. But regardless of that, who knows who the owners of Spurs will be in 10, 20, yrs time, & this applies to every club. You mentioned debt, aren't Spurs currently in debt to the tune of approx £700m? As a Chelsea fan I'm waiting to see what's going to happen with regard to a new stadium at Stamford Bridge. If & when this might happen, & with a cost of as much as £2b, I'm hoping our new owners don't burden the football club with huge debt. This was the beauty of Roman Abramovich, he had promised the new stadium would be funded completely separately from the club. It would have most likely been funded by Abramovich himself. If he can write-off a £1.5b debt in one stroke then he could fund the £2b cost of a new stadium. It was never to be , sadly.

Thank you so much for this comment. ☺️🙏🏽 In the middle of editing the next video and this made my day.

His rolex one is my favorite

You need a researcher and or a script writer?

COYS 😁 the future is bright! Thank you for the kind words and subscription. 🙏🏽

Thank you so much! 🙏🏽😊

You’re absolutely right! Their interest payments are so low because of the timing the stadium project was happening, had they waited a few years they might’ve ended up paying triple the price!

To counter this, the costs went up massively due to Brexit and the uncertainty it caused.

Haha, he's my favourite player! 😁

Thank you! 🙏🏽

Thank you! 🙏🏽😊

Thank you so much for the continued support! 😄😊

Thank you! 😁

Thank you! 😁🙏🏽

Didn't know about this, interesting. A lot of fans seemed critical of Levy for not selling them. £25M PA was the supposed asking price, but in 2023 Levy has stated the above, so Spurs are not desperate to sell them.

When you consider Arsenal sold theirs for 100m over 50 years around 2005/2006 that is quite a jump! @@jonmurray2350

Thank you! 😁🙏🏽

Welcome aboard! 😁 Thank you!

My Bad! I meant to say “ Levy has only Achieved only the 1 league cup 🏆 “. My comment was long enough, and speaking to other Spurs fans, I don’t need to explain how past history = Frustration. But also in today’s “Win Now” & “What have you done lately” mentality. Success is still achieved, a 🏆 isn’t the only thing that a team can be called a success. That’s something I believe is important to remember and for younger generation to know! Media drives the 🏆= success, with YT channels that just support that mentality! So many examples: but take Luton and their success over past 8 years, and if they manage to stay in PL next season that’s an amazing successful season.

Ayyy! 🙏🏽😁

Thank you so much, will do! 🙏🏽😁

Fingers crossed. 🤞🏽

Very ambitious, highly doubt it. 😅

Nah good luck trying (tough ask)

🤣🤣🤣

The way he pronounced "Levy". It should be pronounced 'Leevee', not 'Levvy'.

Di lu wat 😖

@@ordinarychris Di lu lu

Send over an email! 😊

@@watchalexander Sent it over! Cheers

Thank you so much! 🙏🏽😁 And aha while I was already editing the video, I realized I had forgotten to mention Maddison in the notable players list so I made sure to include a clip of him just before listing the players.

So supporting Chelsea, Man Utd and Everton is NOT stressful then?

Thank you. 🙏🏽😁 COYS!

Thank you 🙏🏽😁 and aha, better luck next season! 😌

@@watchalexander Hopefully my brother

​@@onfire585chelsea is in a precourious position with those long contracts. so it'll be interesting to see how that pans out with boehlys plan

@@mxsthxted What? What are you talking about, in a precarious position because of those long contracts? How do you work that one out? Putting young players on longer contract is much more likely to benefit the club & put them in a stronger position as the years go by. I don't see much risk for the club because of 7 & 8 yr contracts as opposed to 5 & 6 yr contracts. The only way I can think of that you think puts Chelsea in a precarious position is if in a few yrs the club wanted to sell any of these players but that the player might refuse to be transferred & decide to sit out the remaining yrs of his contract & just pick up his wages. How realistic is that though, how likely is it that a player of 24, 25, 26, yrs old & just coming into the prime yrs of his career is going to say they would rather stay at Chelsea & play no more football for the remaining yrs on his contract & just because he doesn't want to move to another club? It's not the length of a player's contract that can make it difficult to sell a player on, it's high wages that does that. And none of the young players Chelsea have given long contracts to are on the really big salaries.

Only club with a sustainable model? How do you work that one out? Tottenham's model of operating is no more or no less sustainable than that of many other clubs.

@@danniwilder2198 every club releases financial statements, they're one of the only premier league teams turning a profit, look it up for yourself

@@danniwilder2198 lowest wage to revenue ratio in the league for several years running now, while competing in the top half consistently. maybe "only" was a bit hyperbolic but my point stands