Yea but on the other hand printing vinyls right from the slicer after dropping mp3 into it would be cool

They got me for about 5 mins before I realized the date lmao

@@sacric1de that's impressive on a 2.5 minute video

For me it was more like: "Wow, this is amazing, how did they manage to get that print resolution?" "Oh fuck when was this uploaded..."

Saw this a few days after April fools. I actually went to their website to see if I could print one. Took about 10 minutes before I saw when it was posted.

I am sure some audiophiles will still present this as the whole truth in years to come.

i thought it was reall, it kind of sucks the audio but maan I lked it

Also tungsten nozzle for heavy metal

Obviously you don't give credit to the _warmth_ of tube amplifier either 😅 (Seriously, music listeners with "golden ears" used to be able to _hear the difference_ between CD and analog)

​@@kimmotoivanenthere are differences in the audio played from vinyl when compared to CDs, such as cross talk and low end compression and expansion. It's these defects in the sound which are missing from digital audio, which audiophile miss; even though digital is more faithful reproduction.

@@Mjbeswick faithful to which? The actual recording or to the music itself?

That's actually not a false statement technically speaking, an analog signal is a continuous line of uninterrupted phisical data while a digital one is composed of numerous samples of the original analog signal meassured every (T) seconds, thus making it a discrete signal, which means, is a series of snippets of the original signal so close together that we can't, at a glance, detect the information loss. The fidelity of the signal deppends on how close to the original analog signal is or how close are the samples from one another, that's called a sampling interval. The reason why analog recordings may sound bad or "low quality" is because analog players reproduce every single variable, from wind interference to dust and grime in the record or tape. The only way to play an analog and make it sound as pristine as it can is using a completelly clean record and play it on a vaccum sealed from every external influence, which is unrealistic.

​@@A1998GatewayPCSame can be said about digital formats.

Huh? Sounds right to me

@@monster2slayer The speaker is using the /ɪ/ vowel, like in "win". It's typically the /aɪ/ dipthong. It absolutely sounds like he's not a native speaker...which I suspect is because he's Czech.

@@ToastbackWhale oh yeah i forgot that english is a nonsensical language where letters barely meaning anything.

@@monster2slayer You aren't wrong, but I'm also not sure what that has to do with accented speech.

yes he uses the czech pronounciation of vinyl

I wouldn't be surprised if you could actually do it, just needs non-planar printing and very low layer lines, or a WIDE resin printer

@@denisflorian2431 or just print verticaly like a lithophane ^^

I was able to do this a number of years ago. I printed cylinders in vase mode, and encoded the mono data on the radius dimension. A 8 inch tall 4 inch diameter cylinder could store about 10 seconds of 10khz bandwidth audio (spinning at 500 rpm). I had a friend help with the software to generate the G-Code. The files were massive, and it didn't sound particularly great. The limiting factor was the positional resolution of the printer. We also used an optical laser displacement sensor to read the audio, which had some issues. But it was relatively cheap.

Expected shipment date: April 4th, 2404.

@@daneverhart7649 Still faster than expected 😆

yep - just my thinking. But how to do both sides? I'm sure its doable, just its beyond my skillset lols.

@@Shannon-Smith print sheet with fixed track texture. Forget sparkly colours and carbon fibre lookalike-ness. Maybe (with perfect first layer) it could actually be playable?

April 1

@@OmerMeshy Only in some places. I finally found the STL's... whew