The difference between a real sales person and management class

Agreed - what a massive difference in attitude, selling the firm in the best possible way, explaining the various price ranges and sizes, doing a superb marketing job with no bad "what are you doing" attitude. OK, I don't have £750,000 let alone £3+ Million, but he redeemed that company in 2-3 minutes compared to the "we insist" drone owner (perhaps having his Health and Safety head screwed on tight!!) Security guard and hidden SIA card seemed quite a lot more reasonable at the end, despite the attitude several staff were showing initially without knowing, not caring about the limits of what they can expect, demand or request, just blundering about like a bull in a china shop, making ridiculous claims about what is needed, what's not allowed and why they felt private land stopped any access or recording about what may be visible. Amazing degree of patience and calmness shown to hold back from saying "nothing you can do to stop me" which might have been my reaction, had I been faced by those initial staff members, assuming they had the ability to prevent someone doing a legal activity (ignoring their unsupported expectations of doing what they wished, and meekly conforming to their silly demands).

You see the same thing at most companies, the management usually have a lack of intelligence and common sense compared with the lower staff, higher education doesn't equal intelligence, its just collecting and remembering data to gain a degree. Ive met people who earn millions and cant change a bayonet light bulb. This is the reason most staff at a company know whats going wrong and can see what needs changing to make staff happy but management cant figure it out because they're too lazy and important to leave their desk, this equals high staff turnover and poor customer service

Came here for this comment, he was great and turned it around at the end Appalling but funny until him

@@marinka424He probably does. So what?

Real ish, and the people they are voting in are often worse 🤦🏻‍♂️

whats really scary is you watched this video, took the auditor on his word and never researched any of it yourself... look up ownership of airspace above private land, and you will see there are 2 types of airspace, lower stratum and upper stratum, the lower is around 500 to 1000 feet above roof level, and this is the company's, therefore you ARE trespassing if you fly over the property and within that height limit.

YES that is the simple answer to the problem. MORE RESEARCH NEEDED into who can and who cannot VOTE.

well said...

That is exactly what I think … never underestimate the power of st

@ericmurray8233 - 🤔hmmm... not silly, necessarily, just semi-informed and confused! ( as we all are! )

Very true, time to buy yourself a sailing yacht and leave it all behind.

@@marinka424 I have a sailing yacht 🥺. But I’ve never played golf.

@@marinka424 very true, thank you.

That's why aliens 👽 won't visit. 😂

Flying boats can fly.🤣

@@keithpop3097 - 🤠Right! ... and that ownership extends right out of Earth's atmosphere, and into space, as far as the end of the universe! ... ( my uncle's friend's wife's husband has a cousin that works at Nasa! ... So I'm VERY well informed of that fact! ) 🤣

From 20:23 he had openly professed his own knowledge of flying drones under 250G and claiming safety as being paramount, and discussing whether he had insurance, he was in fact distracting the pilot mid flight and creating a safety hazard.

I agree 100% these is nothing like an "expert" Side note I know loads of people who think qualifications are "contagious" If you sit near someone or at the same desk you can catch a degree from them😂

You need OUR permission 😂. Turn up in Hi-Vis with 'drone pilot' on the back, a take off/ landing pad etc. and it's rare that you will be approached .

@@A2Z1Two3 - 🤨But drone pilots MUST carry spare batteries and a screwdriver, and a sandwich🤪

He IS breaking GDPR because he is filming commercially He DOES need insurance because he is filming commercially

@@danielweston8077that’s rubbish. Gdpr is the companies responsibility. If DJ records sensitive information then it’s them breaching gdpr. Also, he’s not technically flying commercially, but if you argued that being paid by KZfaq is commercial, then that’s fine. DJ has a license and insurance. If paparazzi photographs a politician and the politician is holding sensitive paperwork that can be seen in the pic, which person is breaking GDPR ?

@@kensukadventures628 youre wrong, what you regard is of no consequence.

😅😂😅😂😅😂😅

ffs 🤣😂🤣😂

😂😂

NO, they just employ them

🤔... Yes, right, however, everyone does that really, don't they? ... Very few people are actually experts at anything, even the job they are doing! ... The phrase: "A littlr knowledge is a dangerous thing!" comes to mind, so that's why they will call "the authorities", who will then REALLY muddy the waters! ( but spout THEIR person opinions, yet in a very authoritative and pretend-knowledgeable way! ) 🤣🤪

@PJ-wm9nq - 🤗They take it in turns to show off their knowledge, hoping this guy is going to end up saying: "Sod this! ... I'm going over to the pub for a pint! ... Keep your cheap old yachts!" 🤣

Same, the downwards displeasing angle of her eyebrows was classic !

Yes, looked like a punched lasagna

Face like the smell of gas

chewing wasps all day.

yes, like a bulldog chewing a wasp.

I thought that was Douglas Adams but I can imagine Twain saying it too.

Agonised frown of his knowledge being wrong but wont have it,, that's the most work he has done in ages.

Sometimes it pays off to just listen, and look intelligent! 🥳

Why call the police you yourself said only the police can check your credentials they want to check your credentials so you in fact told them they need to call the police

Whats so hilarious about that ?🤔 ( it's like grown ups dealing with a child ) they walked off because it's so ridiculous to even spend a minute arguing with him 🤷

@@mikegraham8319 Agreed. Their knowledge of the law and discussion abilities were extremely childlike. Hence why they walked off, just like children do.

Your spelling is embarrassing you pal!

@@ipjdean don't let it worry you

are you sure they can read LOL

They all do!

and the seabed because of those pesky submarines.

Only as far as the Andromeda galaxy.

Oi! I have big ears... 😂😂😂😂

Funny

@josh_bfc_2769 - 😁OK! ... I'll remember that, when I get my "yacht-license"! 🤣

I'm guessing he bowls from the pavilion end so would be very familiar with that part of his anatomy anyway.

Words of wisdom 👍

someone gets it at last 🙂

bullshit mate, you dont even own 1cm above your lawn 😂

You are the one that's incorrect, check out the lower and upper stratum. Who owns the air above your land? Source -- Land Owners Rights. Well in short you do! So why do you ask are aircraft allowed to overfly? The answer is in the Civil Aviation Act 1982 which, denies the landowner any remedy for “trespass” or “nuisance” “by reason only of the flight of an aircraft over any property at a height above the ground which, having regard to wind, weather and all the circumstances of the case is reasonable, or the ordinary incidents of such flight.” If your neighbours tree overhangs your property you are entitled to ask them to remove it or do so yourself (subject to tree preservation orders of course) and return to them the offending branch. In built up areas you now rarely see T cranes with their swinging counterbalance. This is because the adjacent landowner is entitled to refuse permission for it to over swing their land and can charge a substantial sum to grant permission. Under English law a landowner owns the airspace above his land (unless it has been expressly excluded from the lease or transfer to him) and it is therefore trespass if a developer or its contractor allows a tower crane jib to swing across land owned by other parties. An adjoining owner can obtain an injunction to prevent such trespass without needing to show that any damage has occurred. An ‘Oversail’ licence is required and a fee must be negotiated in which the landowner can effective ask whatever they like. Not yet tested in law the same will apply to the operation of a drone. You must have permission of the landowner to overfly their land because drone operations take place in that area below that the level at which ordinary flight takes place. This area of airspace owned by the landowner! Ah, but my permission from the CAA says I can fly up to 50 meters from a structure so surely if I keep that distance away I am ok. Well no, all the CAA are doing is saying what you can do from the CAA point of view. It is down to you the Drone Pilot to secure the permissions to overfly land that you have not had permission to take off from.@@zendesigner

@@TONE11111 lol , down the rabbit hole over a Drone , a quick search brought up this "The basis of UK land law is the presumption that all land belongs to the Crown. Everybody else is a tenant of the Crown who holds their land from the Crown. This principle operates on the basis of Right of Conquest, when it was accepted that the sovereign owned all the land and individuals could hold, or rent, land from the king, but at a price - usually cash or fighting men for the king. This is the origin of a leasehold property. Later, when the king required more money, he started selling land ‘freehold’. This meant the tenant could hold or occupy the land free of any charge to a superior. Note that in both cases the land is merely held, not owned. In other words, purchasers did not buy the land; they bought the freehold, or the right to occupy the land without charge. In this way, all individuals except the sovereign were said to hold the land “of” someone else. This is the roots of sovereignty. However, when land became ‘ownerless’ [as in intestate estates or company bankruptcy], it reverted back to the sovereign as absolute owner. This principle still operates today. However, instead of the word ‘sovereign’, the word ‘Crown’ is used as a metaphor for the institution of government - which the sovereign embodies and represents."

Scott Chegg , I reference Reggie Photo for that is better.

PJ said it to a woman in an old video.

Wayne Kerr.

Chris Packet one of the auditors used!

Perfect😂

Perfect answer ! 🤣

And there is a huge vacuum inside.

There's no difference if he is receiving money from YT he is classed as a commercial venture .. Google it !

From where he was, if his feed cut, he'd be able to see what way it was moving and facing. Your argument is invalid in this instance.

I think DJE already knows the regulations

I remember classes A - G of airspace. Drones up to 250gm may only fly up to 400'AGL so what is the relevance of 500' upwards?

I was just correcting DJE's opinion that the landowner 'doesn't own the airspace', when they do. @@petercornish9903