Someone who has an obsession over Doctor Who and FNAF. This channel was such a gem of a find.

this video was a nightmare to get out. I feel like I post this under every FNAF video but seriously the copyright overlords are so harsh to me on these ones💀 This video was originally blocked worldwide but I managed to get it down to a partial block so, if you are in one of those countries where it got blocked, I apologise. The claim itself is completely baseless as they always are so hopefully the dispute should be sorted within a couple of weeks but it still sucks and completely saps away all my motivation. However, with all that said, the Complete Five Nights at Freddy's Timeline should be releasing soon. It's a pretty big one. In that video, I will be referring back to this one in the Midnight Motorist portion of it (because as I mention here, this video was originally just a section of that video) so I hope you enjoy... and happy Friday 13th 🎃 Edit 1: The video got Copyright STRUCK!! BUT WE'RE BACK, those loser weirdo bozos can't stop us. Hope you continue to enjoy!

I really like your approach of treating fnaf like a story and not a puzzle to be solved. I feel like at this point it’s impossible to make all the pieces fit together in a perfect way so focusing on the story from a literary analysis point of view is a breath of fresh air.

There's a bit of glossing over in both theories, and it's for the idea that the events of midnight MUST connect directly to fnaf4 gameplay. Yes, they are undoubtedly closer than other games in lore connections, but there can be a through line that requires extra steps and info. Michael being the child that runs away doesn't prove that the crying child's emotions were unjustified. And crying child going through all that trauma doesn't mean he must become someone who runs away. Also, you don't talk about the changes in Michael's demeanor. Before the bite of '83, foxy bro is incredibly mean, pranking his brother and preying on his trauma knowingly. After the events, if we assume the first theory is correct and that is Michael, he is calmer, probably more mature, and most importantly defending the crying child from William. This is huge, because it's a great example of someone who didn't go through nightmares and head trauma, but still ended up having a huge personality shift for one reason or another. Now use that for the other theory: Michael gets his brother's head bitten, and the following years are filled with his parent/s yelling at him, the family shunning him, and when his brother finally passes, immense guilt. Then he starts hearing voices saying it's his brother, and the ghost asks for his help outside of the house? Of course he's going to break out of his bedroom window and go do something. Regardless of how mad his father is going to get, regardless of how the situation is. Everything right then depends on making it up to his brother in any crazy way he can. This is the biggest point for both theories that I think you missed: humans are incredibly susceptible to drastic changes when any form of trauma enters their life, regardless if it's literal psychological torture

Henry's line of 'a wound first inflicted on me' I think just means that ir was William's first kill not the first death

Flatline Theory / Mound Theory - What if the Crying Child flatlined at the hospital, but was not then buried properly/officially? This is partly to do with the mound. If CC flatlined at the hospital, then his death is officially recorded and there is no benefit to hiding the body. The reason you would bury a body on the side of the road is if you do not want that body seen / examined by medical professionals and law enforcement. I believe this rules out CC as in the mound, because his death was a completely public and documented occurrence; he was taken in to be treated, he did linger for some period of time afterwards. What I think we should be asking is this; who has died in a way where it would be beneficial to prevent any post-mortem examination? Whoever died in a way that would incriminate someone directly / launch an investigation because of suspicious evidence --- that's who's buried in that spot. Further, that spot is by a business building connected to Fazbears (currently or formally does not matter, because we have no idea how long the mound has been there) and is within close proximity to the Afton house, which is a household associated with at least two dead children (eventually) and a missing mother. It would be very strange in such a tight story (all cutscenes are always very specific and features a short cast of characters in them) for there to be a murderer living in a house near an unmarked grave and for there to be zero connections. One more thing; the Motorist makes comments and observations about his environment. He does not acknowledge the mound, but the storyteller (scott) wants us to see the mound. This implies the mound is not a noteworthy feature to the Motorist; it is an important enough detail for us, the audience, to be shown it but it invokes zero emotion in the Motorist. This either means the motorist sees it and doesn't care that it's there as a random feature (random to him / unimportant to him, but not us) or he is so familiar with exactly what it is that he no longer has anything to say about it. If it invoked any kind of emotion, he would have said something (anything; angry, sad, introspective; anything!) but it causes him no distress, no new thoughts, no personal observations... He is comfortable with the mound being there; what does he know? Why does he know? Lastly: It is legally difficult / impossible / completely illegal to bury a body in a random place in the United States of America. You have to get permission, it has to be fully documented and marked. If the mound is a grave, it is not connected with a death that is known about, because it is buried in an illegal way. Again; if you are not trying to cover anything up, why would you create an unnecessary crime that could later be discovered, when you did not kill the person to begin with?

Being Doctor Who fans I think we have an upper hand when it comes to solving complicated lore 😂

Really good video once again! Both theories are very compelling and I can't decide which one I like more. Top tier content as always

I think your new remade timeline video will change the way everyone looks at this story. Can't wait to see it honestly.

How have I never heard of you before? Thank you to KZfaq for my recommendations. I love supporting underrated content creators. Especially FNAF ones. (nice editing, bro.)

Getting my FNAF lore homework done ready for the movie later this month. As always, thanks for the video and stay 🐐ed my guy 💪💪

Complete speculation on my part: I've been thinking that if JR's is not a bar then could it be Circus Baby's Pizza World or Circus Baby's Entertainment and Rentals before it became either of those?

Apologies for this being unrelated but just hoping you see it. I’ve been obsessed with your channel lately as I’m itching for doctor who content. Thank you so much for the length of your videos as I watch them to fall asleep also it seems every night as I’m just nodding off I get blasted with super loud distorted audio not only does it give me a fright but also makes me die laughing every time. Thanks pal 😂

I’d be interested to see if this lines up with my personal theory!

So, this is the brand new caretaker of the old Bunny Smiles facility.

It’s Andrew Imo I think Andrew MM answers almost every question toy chica high school years: there’s a victim who’s represented by the puppet that has midnight motors happened one to one. (it’s important to know that in victims are out of order as Susie’s representative die 2nd) . The other 2 minigames are about kids William killed so why would MM be any different. While he doesn’t appear physically like Charlie’s mini game we see evidence that he was there the footprints near the window just like the tire track near Charlie’s body. The runaway: Andrew Why can’t orange guy be William: While William and Orange guy are both abusive parents. William is also a neglectful parent is negligence is what gets Elizabeth and BV killed. Orange guy on the other hand while a terrible parent isn’t neglectful the moment he gets in the house he immediately wants smoke with his son and it’s implied he’s done this multiple times. Who is the orange guy and the couch potato: Andrew’s Dad and Mom What is “that place again” : JRS What is JRS: I believe JRS is the mediocre melodies location. Andrew has some odd connection to the mediocre melodies if orange guy, his dad made the mediocre melodies that would perfectly explain why he uses them. Why orange guy is Banned is because Fazbear entertainment bought him out. The mediocre melodies are implied to be bootleg versions of the Freddy cast. So Fazbear entertainment probably bought them out to remove competition Why is it called Jrs: I think the sign is just meant to represent that it’s for kids. So the place is called Frederick family diner, but it has a Jrs sign to say this is for kids When does midnight motors take place: 1983 after Charlie dies. The rain in the “later night really screams” that to me. Also, the code to see the experiment room cameras is 1983 so that probably means they were created in 1983. Orange guys purple car: simple it’s just a way to trick us. We’re going to think Williams in the car only to be shocked when it’s some orange guy. (this is just classic Fnaf tricking) Why is Orange guy not allowed to enter: well, this is easy Orange guy is banned because he’s an abusive father so he’s banned because of his abusive behavior this is why green guy says “ come on YOU know you can’t be here don’t make things harder than it has to be” The footprints outside the window: William in a suit Why is William trying to take Andrew away from his home: William most likely saw Andrew get abused by his father, and he realize he could take this opportunity and manipulate his son. In fact, William could be the reason why Orange guy specifically not allowed in the building Where does William take Andrew: he takes Andrew to the underground bunker where the nightmare experiments are the mound Why do the nightmare experiments exist this early in the timeline: Simple William was always doing experiments not caring for other lives. Dittophobia states that the experiments are to study fear. So before William became obsessed with possession he was studying emotions. what is the purpose of the mound/lump in midnight motors: Simple it’s a secret entrance to the experiment rooms. It’s where it William took Andrew. What does “he’ll be sorry when he gets back” mean: it’s irony the truth is Andrew’s never coming back The footprints outside are what shows this is. Also, it just means he’s going to give him an ass whooping that’s it. If Andrew gets kidnapped in 1983 why does he die in 1985 in the Freddy Fazbear’s location: Simple Andrew was putting in the nightmare experiments for 2 years. Somehow he was able to escape the facility but when he did and made it outside. William caught him off guard and hit him with a shovel, put a bag over his head and throw into his car. William bring Andrew to the 1985 Freddy’s he tries one last time to lie to Andrew however, Andrew doesn’t buy it, so William gets physical giving him a painful death. It’s also important to know that Andrew doesn’t actually have to be a part of the MCI toy chica high school year cut scenes are not in Canon order so Andrew could be William’s first kill in Freddy’s. How did Andrew possess William: simply according to William, the spirit follows the flesh so… this means in order for Andrew to possess William got physical with Andrew basically William Beat to death. Basically Andrew had very gory fate. Why do the SL animatronics exist: The SL animatronics aren’t actually meant to kill kids. They’re meant to capture them. Elizabeth’s death has been stated to just be an accident. So what is their purpose once Andrew William has lost his main experiment victim. So now he needs to find some new ones in order to make things easier instead of just kidnapping kids. he makes the sister location animatronics to do the job for him capture a child and allow William to put in the experiment chamber. Also try to debunk some counterpoint Andrew says he never had anyone to talk to you but the chairperson is sympathetic to the run: the person on the couch doesn’t actually care when they said “ leave him alone, he had a rough day today” They’re saying like they’re annoyed. When orange guy gets in his rage and starts yelling, they don’t care they’re just stuck to the TV. As for how they would know about his rough day it’s implied Andrew goes to school so it’s likely the teacher called them about him. Why would Scott introduce a new victim in a game about tying loose ends: in scrap trap salvage section, you can hear his heartbeat meaning that he still alive in the suit. Later in ucn and the man in room 1280 it’s revealed that William’s heart is also still working. This means William being kept alive is because of some spirit that spirit is Andrew. Also, if you think about it, Charlie, Susie and Andrew all represent the first of something Charlie is the first murder of William ever “ wound inflicted on me” Susie is the first MCI Andrew is “first experiment victim” . Also, there’s 7 graves in Fnaf world next to purple guy, so yeah.

Makes more sense if the midnight motorist is about a kidnapped child because in the context of later that night after afton kills his first child in charlie he probably unlocked the monster inside to want to kill kids (we don’t necessarily have specific days he did all of these killings just a general year) he could’ve went and hopped in a suit to go kidnap a kid he may have already knew where they stayed (explains why there are 3 toed footprints) and kidnapped him to take him to freddys , “that place” would infer that the orange guy knows about freddys but just dislikes it and his kid loves it , and there is no evidence that afton was necessarily abusive yeah maybe overprotective but I don’t think he was just an overly aggressive guy especially to his family when he does all of this to “put them back together”

I was prepping for a jumpscare at the start...

what a cool doctor who video

Excited to hear this when I Have time

In regards to the not being the Afton family one: I see as the murder of Cassidy or the Vengeful Spirit or whatever their name is who possesses Golden Freddy the player is yellow than they could be the father of the child who's represented with yellow with the couch person being the mother. The mound's where the body is or something like that (Maybe this before give gifts and the body is brought back and stuffed I don't know.). The rain being there doesn't matter much since it might've just started and even than the springlock suit could've been taken off with all evidence of the suit itself taken away before we see the scene.

Mike seeing N.fredbear on the page about dreams could just be that he had nightmares about the machine that bit his brother,not that he's the character on fnaf4 gameplay

Trying to solve Doctor Who And Fnaf is no easy task trust me I tried

i believe the runaway is michael

6:09 maybe quantitatively, but definitely not qualitative. Streets ≠ sidewalks, Jr's ≠ Fredbear's, we see barely any tall trees near fredbear's or near the house in fnaf4 and nothing _but_ trees in motorist. This is definitely not a good enough parallel. But we'll see if the other evidence holds up better

Awesome intro 🔥

I believe in bv = runaway and I can explain the bag of dirt in midnight motorist in this bag of dirt is Mrs afton glaive mean that Mrs afton die first and the footsteps belongs to shadow Freddy.

Doesn't fnaf 4 start with the minigames gameplay ? If so it makes sense to say you play as the CC, even if we call it minigames, in fnaf 4 it is part of the main game not some secret part.

*THE LUMP*

It'd have been funny if at the beginning of the video there was a TARDIS lmao

*Lazy cops takes the payoff from William afton*

Why would charlie die the first without a motive for the main villan, crying child die first for his brother bulling and family problems,after poor crying child die that relly made me sad at the end of the game😢,that gives William a jerk motive,and then the events of soul and many stuff and finally micheal and henry erase the erros of willam and his victims and souls i to a fire 🔥 Also yellow is springbonnie

I don't have a definitive stance on Midnight Motorist, not even if it is about the Aftons, but I felt like I needed to throw in my two cents into this: Jr's is probably a bar, it is the only way the Green Guy's line makes sense, but it might have been built where Fredbear's was before it got closed. Also, I am pretty sure in the games continuity Charlie died at Freddy's, regardless of whether her or Bite Victim died first. I can elaborate on that if you want. You also start the minigame leaving a far away road, meaning the murder did not happen at JR's; I also don't see why William would already have underground gas chambers before Charlie or Bite Victim died, so I am not convinced this was the punishment William gave; Technically, the person in the couch is not wearing gray, looking at the feet it looks to be some kind of robe-thing or a blanket. I also don't see why the couch person can't be Ms Afton instead of a new character; If we are following Afton Midnight Motorist logic, then the lump is probably either Ms Afton or the Crying Child if it is a grave; Golden Freddy being what is outside makes a lot of sense, however I am not convinced Crying Child became part of Golden Freddy, so I will leave what the footsteps are up in the air, but I must say they do not lead anywhere; Due to lots of things I won't get into, Elizabeth **cannot** have died before Charlie; Henry's quote about the wound first inflicted on him means Afton's first victim was Charlie, not that Charlie was the first death in the series; Interesting video, though.

FNAF 4 answers the FNAF 2 phone guy calls

There are just too many details like the broken window that break the theory however you spin it. My personal favourite theory is that this is showing the unstable home life of one of the missing children the night he is kidnapped. Yellow guy is not William and is the abusive father of the kid (the yellow/purple thing always bugged me) and William is the one to break the window to kidnap the kid. There are more than a few holes in this theory too like the mound and the purple car which I will admit don’t fit with the theory but I think this intent fits more in the context of the other 2 fnaf 6 mini games. (The Susie one and the Charlie one) It is there to further show how Afton picked vulnerable kids by manipulating them to keep coming back to ‘that place.’ Overall I don’t know what is correct just like everyone else. Maybe even Scott Cawthon doesn’t know the correct interpretation and made this another mystery for fans to argue about until he comes back to it in a later game, except he never did

Let me help you, I have some ideas as well… In FNaF World you can see a cave entrance as well. This might be the mound. According to Room for One More the entrance of Sister Location also aligns with this theory. The Circus Gallery is also has gateways to Fredbear’s. There might be another entrance like a basement entrance. With that in mind you need to believe JR’S is Fredbear’s. You see, the location is still filled with cars all around the building, the lights are on and there’s also a person outside. It matches with Fredbear’s in FNaF 4, it also matches with the map of Breaker Room. I think this either means, people came in to visit Fredbear’s or technicians are taking care of the animatronics after the bite, Henry included. That way he has a motive for making Security Puppet, to keep Charlie away from the exit while he’s working. I personally believe TV Guy is Michael, the one who ran is Crying Child. He either ran to Fredbear’s or Freddy’s and saw Charlie’s body. The footprints are, Shadow Freddy, in Follow Me mini games you can see Shadow Freddy luring the robots to safe room mimicking William. Twisted Ones has a reference for him, Michael Brook, Golden Freddy showing up in the woods for example. And most importantly Into the Pit. The Bunny is Eleanor William’s sidekick / evil / agony hero or enemy. The bunny wanted show Oswald the murder. I think that’s exactly what happened. Shadow Freddy taking the form of Fredbear showed up lured Crying Child away and wanted to show him her body. The next day guess what happens… “He locked you in your room AGAIN” But something has changed, he has seen what happened. He is traumatized. That’s why Nightmare has an important place in FNaF 4 and that’s why it becomes Puppet in Halloween. Because it is William’s wickedness born from Charlie’s spirit taking the form of Puppet.

IT RETURNED FROM COPYRIGHT HELL! REJOICE

Real FNAF fans call it the lump (reference)

Calling it right now, MNM has to be the aftermath of Cassidy being abused and taken by William in the Spring Bonnie suit as the Chica cutscenes tell us how William killed the MCI victims with the first being identical to Susie becoming Chica from Fruity Maze and the last one being about William beating up the kid if they don't follow him. And with the new book story, the family has to be Cassidy's parent's who were obviously not good at their job and to repersent why Cassidy would be so vengeful to begin with. Not to mention Scott said many times he clears up stuff in the next game and UCN (being the next game after FNAF 6) is heavily about Golden Freddy.

MNM is either about what i said in my previous comment and replies or about Henry and his family coping with Charlie's death as Henry still supposedly has his son Sammy and his Wife as they didn't leave him until after Charlie died. The pile of dirt could be Charlie's grave explaining why he stops and gets out of his car to walk there dispite their being no path and the footprints has to be a Springlock suit, Shadow Freddy or an old mascot suit as they are the only things that have 3 toes and the only ones who woukd have access to any of them are William or Henry as the made the suits and wear them.

Love your videos- but had to stop at the 5:30 mark because you stated that both theories you’re bringing up run on the assumption that yellow/orange guy is William Afton. In a game series so hyperfixated on colors and who these colors apply to, theres zero likelihood IMO that he’s William. It just makes no sense to portray him that way. So until theres a more plausible theory as to WHY he’s that color, instead of being purple like usual, I can’t really agree with any theory stating he’s William. Its too big of a detail to ignore.