Please click the link to watch our other Weapon Detective videos kzfaq.info/sun/PLEMWqyRZP_LrdqB-XbqY2LocUVEaG_w7D Please click the link to watch our other South Korean Systems videos kzfaq.info/sun/PLEMWqyRZP_LpRJdM5hpRRKKQMaKtFfAxS Please click the link to watch our other Weapon Detective-Sea videos kzfaq.info/sun/PLEMWqyRZP_Lr1-xIzFrM6xUHCOgetdkmp
@taichung4653 ай бұрын
I think this video sums it up best, that the Daegu is not a frigate but a heavily armed corvette. And the sacrifice of crew habitability probably won't be an issue considering its primary mission of coastal patrol with a 2 weeks on/2 weeks off patrol interval.
@Mseabra753 ай бұрын
Very interesting video, as the Peruvian navy just signed a $450M+ contract with HHI for a frigate, an OPV and 2 LSTs. Rumors states that it would be base on the Daegu class but with 3500-4000 ton displacement. I know that our navy will not use the newer Chungnam class as an AEGIS radar system is too expensive for us. I hope that if they decide to go with the Daegu class the higher displacement would resolve those flaws. Our current Lupo class frigate uses the LM2500 turbine so I hope they don’t choose the MT30.
@mark_dauz3 ай бұрын
My royal malaysian navy should consider this.. This ship offer low cost with better equipment.. It suitable for our navy that only operate in our territories n rarely going international operation
@miguelrage68103 ай бұрын
this is the base design for the upcoming Phil. Navy corvettes with a 76mm super rapid main gun and CODAD configuration as the key difference
@reneabrea41233 ай бұрын
Money down first, stop spreading your dream. Filipinos love to day dream and easy to fool. Ok part of mind conditioning.🤣🤣🤣
@lucianohelvecioteixeira.99953 ай бұрын
Por isso vocês são melhores site referente assuntos militares Obrigado
@ph11p35402 ай бұрын
He spends a lot of time researching his subjects
@Peter.A-A3 ай бұрын
Great video. ❤
@habahan42573 ай бұрын
Good video. Please also make a video for the Istif-class frigate of the Turkish Navy.
@WeaponDetective3 ай бұрын
Thanks for your interesting. We added the Istanbul class to our list.
@robertharper37543 ай бұрын
@@WeaponDetective, I know you usually do videos on systems that are already produced, but any chance of getting a few videos on weapon systems not produced? I'd love to hear your take on the proposed MEKO A300!
@WeaponDetective3 ай бұрын
@@robertharper3754 Thanks for your interest. We give importance to the visuality of our videos. So, As you notice, since we do not find footage we do not make a video for systems not in production. Let's see what we make. But we cannot give you a promise.
@phil_nebula67622 күн бұрын
The Philippine Navy first newbuilt surface combatant the Jose Rizàl-class frigate are base on the Incheon-class/FFX-Batch I, while the Miguel Malvar-class (formerly HDC/HDF-3200 frigate), is base on the Daegu-class/FFX-Batch II frigate, can't wait for the Chungnam-class/FFX-Batch III comissioned as the sucessor will likely influence the sucessor to the Miguel Malvar-class frigate!
@clipclipmovie79073 ай бұрын
very good video with detailed explanations. plz make another video about the successor, Chungnam class
@Vendell_233 ай бұрын
Same class as the Philippine navy future corvette HDC 3200
@andreiarce40102 ай бұрын
Nah this is the hhi 3800
@RobMcGinley813 ай бұрын
As a former maintainer I can tell you the MK 45 5" Gun maximum rate of fire is only 16-20 RPM. The previous Mk 42 could fire 40 RPM but it had a duel ammunition feed system. That's why the MK 45 is considered to be a light weight gun.
@robertopiedimonte20783 ай бұрын
Absolutely yes, and its 20 rounds drum limit to this number this capability. After someone have to manually reload the drum. Recently is available an automated AHS that can reload ammunitions from deposit having one or two arms. In the first case can load 10 rounds in the drum, in the second 20, so not considering barrel wear maximum sustained rate of fire is 20 rounds per minute
@petesheppard17093 ай бұрын
A 5" gun on a corvette is pretty heavy; I wonder if they had shore bombardment in mind.
@Triggatra42583 ай бұрын
@@petesheppard1709 RIGHT. 5" is definitely no joke on smaller corvettes. But on an Arleigh-Burke or other similar sized warships and destroyers, I sometimes wonder WHAT was the US Navy thinking? Because (to me) it literally makes zero sense to put that caliber of gun on such a large warship. Just my thought, what do you think my man? Because China (our modern day Soviet Union) definitely has much larger guns on their Type 052D and 052DL destroyers in the 130mm gun smh. China is not only catching up to US NAVY they are actually SURPASSING it in multiple domains and we should HAVE NEVER and STILL NEVER underestimate them and their capabilities/weapons/sensors/defense and definitely their #'s and most importantly their DOCTRINE of how they are being planned to be used. They will be fighting in literally their own backyard and we have to cross an ENTIRE ocean to get to the fight. USA is in a VERY awkward position and needs to make our next moves our BEST moves. Our number #1 advantage ---> allies. US has over 750 KNOWN bases around the world and Lord knows how many we DON'T know about and what goes on there. We are able to forward deploy key supplies(ammo, spare parts, food, etc.) That alone can make up largely for the tyranny of distance (that's what we call the issue of having to fight a war thousands of miles away from home ports, air bases and army/marine bases) but that in itself cannot fully compensate for the distance which honestly is the #1 thing working against the US in any war. Alrighty OKAY rant/analysis over. Comments/rebuttals are welcome and are actually wanted please I would love to hear anyone's thoughts and/or counter analysis. Have a great day in the USA!!! 🇺🇲🇺🇲🇺🇲 Other countries too, but I am from MERICA' so YEAH GOD BLESS THE U.S. OF A❕❕❕ lemme know what country you hail from please❕❕
@petesheppard17093 ай бұрын
@@Triggatra4258 I'm from the US
@Triggatra42583 ай бұрын
@@petesheppard1709 I KNOW you are. That's why I asked your opinion.
@Keeazul3 ай бұрын
Top heavy with all armaments possible on one, as always.
@edzww273 ай бұрын
the Ph version I think was upgraded to HDC 3200
@jheyabines80353 ай бұрын
Upgrade in size but scale down in capabilities
@Girder33 ай бұрын
That is untrue. In shipbuilding, specifications and design are finalized before construction even begins. HHI's official marketing materials (2020 to 2023) continue to refer to their 3100-ton frigate/corvette design as the HDF-3100 in reference to the baseline empty displacement. Note that I wrote 'empty', as actual displacement in service will vary depending on the equipment/ammunition/complement/cargo load out of the vessel in actual usage. Hence why 'fully loaded' displacement figures are a separate number.
@IlikejetfightersАй бұрын
@@Girder3 fair
@minhmeo95063 ай бұрын
Speaking of NK submarines, can you make a vid about their new ballistic missile submarine?
@rgo1262Ай бұрын
Philippines ordered two ships
@luigipirri20013 ай бұрын
First like😊
@zerovibrittania20773 ай бұрын
such a cool video we all know your videos are so good. But ı dont know what's the reason :P
@gyasiansa33583 ай бұрын
A video on the KSS III submarine 😊
@Triggatra42583 ай бұрын
... NO 🚫👎🏾🔇🙅🏾♂️🙅🏾
@hungryanimal51123 ай бұрын
Hello
@erdiakarsu49453 ай бұрын
New video dropped 👀 Itadakimasu/Bismillah/Thanks for the food 😋🙏 I wonder why 🇰🇷 picked 127mm cannon for Daegu-class frigate.
@Triggatra42583 ай бұрын
Because it's a BEAST
@juliusadriannava1449Ай бұрын
Can you feature the ROKS Yoon-YounghanClass?
@billshun39633 ай бұрын
Room for improvement with your audio system.
@chandrachurniyogi83943 ай бұрын
navies operating carrier strike group should discard their STOBAR aircraft carrier altogether . . . or those aspiring to own a STOBAR carrier . . . a STOBAR aircraft carrier has limited capabilities by design, especially it's air component that's even more compromised . . . a naval carrier borne MIG-29KU multi role fighter operating from a STOBAR aircraft carrier cannot take off with a full complement of weapons & fuel tanks topped to the brim . . . inspite of the assisted ski-jump in the forward bow section of the STOBAR flight deck, facilitating take off . . .
@Triggatra42583 ай бұрын
@sydneystout4003😂😂😂 SAME
@LuobingSong7 күн бұрын
ROK is actually facing the real enermy, they do not need luxury royal liner style Europen frigate, European treat their frigate as a sub destroyer, however Asian navies all have higher standard real large destroyer, in eastern, japan navy Korean navy, Chinese navy and American navy in total have more than 100 real destroyer together with more than 5 real large fleet carrier at sea eastern Pacific navy will never build a European style frigate, Korean can easily beat German navy, and Japan navy can easily defeat Franch navy, and Chinese navy and American navy can easily defeat whole European fleet a European frigate can easily find their death in eastern Pacific
@KrMorgan123 ай бұрын
Mk42는 녹스급인데, 당신은 완전히 할아버지네요...
@Triggatra42583 ай бұрын
WHAT?? DUDE SPEAK ENGLISH!! NOBODY KNOWS WHAT YOU SAID OR CARES 😂😂😂 👎🏾🚫🙅🏾♂️🙅🏾
@blue2804853 ай бұрын
Just add N between A & E.. then read the name of this warships 😝😂
@arturobayangos12233 ай бұрын
Kia/Hyundai is 10x betterer than Howo or Sany truck . That is a fact .
@BRIANJAMESGIBB3 ай бұрын
.
@yarmud3 ай бұрын
i dont know why i am into some of those ladies and not into some other.
@kendopa96043 ай бұрын
Look like copy cat of China Type054 Frigate😅
@Ario_003 ай бұрын
China's Type 054 class copy South Korea's DDH-2 class destroyer.
@trinity12033 ай бұрын
MADE IN CHINA 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
@hoonchung14443 ай бұрын
Who in the world copies cheap, substandard, brittle, tin can, fake Chinese products?
@Chickenworm93943 ай бұрын
@@trinity1203 It's 2024, and whoever still thinks China's production is inferior is utterly brainwashed
@LooxJJ2 ай бұрын
Chinese Type 053~054a and b classes are knock off of French design and 54b based on La Fayette class with Chinese made technologies. Modern, but considered inferior to Western counterparts. Korean Daegu class is a derivative of FFX system which is an advanced/next gen Ticonderoga systems.
@thantzweaung90803 ай бұрын
Too weak even as a large ASW corvette, let alone to be considered a light frigate. Not enough sensors, in variety & quantity. Yet too big. Compared to project 11661 or project 20380 or project 20385 (all of them are significantly smaller), they're basically OPV with limited ASW ability. Even type 056 family has similar weapons & sensor with much better ASW sensors at less than half the size.