Freeman Dyson - Richard Feynman and his work (58/157)

  Рет қаралды 169,695

Web of Stories - Life Stories of Remarkable People

Web of Stories - Life Stories of Remarkable People

7 жыл бұрын

To listen to more of Freeman Dyson’s stories, go to the playlist: • Freeman Dyson (Scientist)
Freeman Dyson (1923-2020), who was born in England, moved to Cornell University after graduating from Cambridge University with a BA in Mathematics. He subsequently became a professor and worked on nuclear reactors, solid state physics, ferromagnetism, astrophysics and biology. He published several books and, among other honours, was awarded the Heineman Prize and the Royal Society's Hughes Medal. [Listener: Sam Schweber; date recorded:1998]
TRANSCRIPT: I immediately heard people talking about Dick. I mean Dick was - everybody called him Dick, 'What did Dick say?' and 'What did Dick think of that?' and so on and so it very quickly became clear that this was somebody noteworthy. And then, the first time I actually got to know him was we went to a seminar at Rochester. At that time the Rochester Department was led by Marshak, and Weisskopf I think was also there, maybe at that time, I'm not sure.
[SS] I think he was at MIT already.
No, maybe he was - yes, it was Marshak was at Rochester... anyway. So every second week we had a seminar at Rochester and then a seminar at Cornell and people would drive back and forth. So I drove up with Feynman to the Rochester seminar one day, and that was when I first got a real chance to talk with him and it was very exciting in both the conversation, and the driving. He was a reckless driver and I was...
[SS] Scared?
Well. I was wondering whether we'd get there alive. I don't know that I was actually scared because I had faith in Feynman, but... Anyway, and he talked, of course, a lot about Los Alamos and about the things he had done with his life. He loved to talk, and he was also interested in me and on what was going on in England. So we hit it off right from the beginning. And then, as the year went by, I became a sort of just an interested spectator, watching him work out his version of quantum electrodynamics, as he was in the middle of that and he was just getting it together and struggling himself to understand what was going on. He had these amazing ways of calculating with diagrams, where you didn't have to have equations but you simply wrote down the answers, and instead of solving equations the way other people did, he just wrote down the answers by looking at the pictures. So it was all very incomprehensible, but it gave the right answers. So that was a big challenge for me, and I decided fairly soon that this was the most interesting thing that I could be doing - was to make sense of Feynman.
[SS] And your own way of doing mathematics and physics was not visual up to that point?
It never was, and I mean I was always analytical in my style, and of course quantum field theory is highly non-visual too. I mean quantum field theory is purely analytical. So I came to Feynman definitely like an anthropologist trying to see what the natives were doing. I mean, I was clearly not his kind of animal.
[SS] And the language was strange.
It was totally strange, and of course, but I found it all very fascinating and the amazing thing was that it gave the right answers. It had some physical basis. I mean, it came originally from Dirac, his style of doing things, but of course he had transformed it totally. Dirac never had pictures in the way he did. He didn't understand it himself, at that time. I mean it all became systematised fairly soon afterwards, but he was still making up the rules as he went along, and was sort of guided by the answers. And one of the big questions which he never really settled was closed loops. When you had diagrams involving electrons going around in circles and coming back on their own tails, what do you do with those? So he had rules for doing that, but there was essentially an ambiguity in whether they should be plus or minus, and so he made up rules so that the answers would come out right, but without any real physical motivation. So we talked a lot about these questions. The general rule was if Feynman was sitting in his office he would keep the door open and anybody could walk in, and then if he wanted to talk he would say, 'Fine, let's talk.' And if he didn't want to talk he'd say, 'Get out!' But you didn't take it personally. No, you never took it personally, and the nice thing was then, if he said, 'Let's come and talk,' you knew he meant it and, and wasn't just being polite. So we got along.
[SS] And he didn't know any field theory either?
He wasn't even interested in learning. He said, right away, you know, he said, 'That stuff isn't for me. That's a hard way of doing it, but I can't do it that way.' He knew his way was better.

Пікірлер: 106
@BeatPoet67
@BeatPoet67 8 ай бұрын
This is so beautiful. He's digging back into what QED actually felt like at the time. And how Feynman felt about it. And he articulates in his expression how deeply impressed he was by Feynman's ideas. I saw Freeman Dyson once when he gave a lecture at Aberdeen University where I was studying Physics. I'd recently read his book "Disturbing The Universe", and wanted to tell him how much I'd liked it but was too fearful to approach him. Don't be fearful kids.
@MDevincenzis
@MDevincenzis 7 жыл бұрын
These interviews are pure gold.
@webofstories
@webofstories 7 жыл бұрын
Glad you like them. More on their way!
@peterdriscoll4070
@peterdriscoll4070 5 жыл бұрын
Yeah, fascinating.
@piglet2548
@piglet2548 4 жыл бұрын
Pure
@MDevincenzis
@MDevincenzis 4 жыл бұрын
RIP Dr. Dyson :(
@globaldigitaldirectsubsidi4493
@globaldigitaldirectsubsidi4493 4 жыл бұрын
@@webofstories yes great insides of brilliant people, I already adopted a lot of wisdome to my life.
@NothingMaster
@NothingMaster 4 жыл бұрын
I really admire the fact that Dyson only utters wonderfully positive commentaries about his old friends and colleagues. The man has always been a class act, in every sense of the word. Unlike Gell-Mann who lamentably trashed just about everyone, every chance he got.
@edwardjones2202
@edwardjones2202 3 жыл бұрын
He just described Richard Scaletter as painfully slow in the previous video!
@Dicklesberg
@Dicklesberg 2 жыл бұрын
@@edwardjones2202 Yes, but he did it in a nice way, and talked about how the remained good friends. And pretty much anyone besides Bethe and Feynman and a few other luminaries would probably appear slow to Dyson!
@Knossos22
@Knossos22 Жыл бұрын
@@Dicklesberg Others such as, Fermi, von Neumann, and Oppy who were generally considered to be lightening fast in their ability to apprehend new ideas, make exceedingly fast approximation calculations, or generally known to be cleaver. By those who knew him, von Neumann was generally thought to be dramatically more capable than Einstein. Of course, it is not always speed that wins a race. Einstein probably succeeded because he was both determined and had a nearly unmatched nose for finding a solvable problem that meant something, and so is among the tiny few scientists to become famous across generations.
@vnever9078
@vnever9078 11 ай бұрын
​@Knossos22 That is true. Considering the kind of people who were trying to attack the same problems as him(Hilbert and other giants), Einstein's endeavors are truly remarkable. Also, the lack of awareness regarding von Neumann's legacy, as I see it, is due to his nature of not caring about credit. John von Neumann had this immense presence in almost every budding field of ideas of that era, but it is almost as if he didn't care about being known as one of the pioneers.
@Nostradamus_Order33
@Nostradamus_Order33 10 ай бұрын
Gell-Mann had his own style. Unless you are some exceptional mathematician or physicist you shouldn’t throw stones
@blueodum
@blueodum 2 жыл бұрын
You can see in his eyes how much he admired Feynman - sort of like a kid talking about meeting his sporting idol.
@smoothcriminal28
@smoothcriminal28 6 жыл бұрын
I can listen to Freeman all day. There's such a strong and soothing conviction in his voice.
@docnelson2008
@docnelson2008 9 ай бұрын
What a great, wonderful series -Dyson has been a personal hero in my own journey in understanding advanced physics. These snippets of a fascinating era in theoretical physics are pure gold. To listen to such a great theorist talking so clearly and profoundly is a joy.
@patrickcowan6134
@patrickcowan6134 Жыл бұрын
He is still astounded by Feynman. You can see a small smile of appreciation at each point. Just stunning.
@vivgm5776
@vivgm5776 3 жыл бұрын
You can see in his eyes when he talk about Feynman still wondering " where the hell did that specimen come from " that's priceless
@mpcc2022
@mpcc2022 7 жыл бұрын
"I was clearly not his kind of animal", such deference for Feynman and humility by Dyson.
@wongawonga1000
@wongawonga1000 6 жыл бұрын
Dyson clearly respected Feynman however I don't think that statement was about deference. It was an acknowledgment of their two different thinking styles. Feynman, like Einstein, was a visual thinker. Dyson was analytical. Its interesting that Feynman was aware of where his strong suit lay in terms of visual thinking. He knew he wasn't analytical and moved away from trying to solve problems using such a technique. Instead he invented his own methodologies (e.g. Feynman diagrams) which produced the same solution in a manner that he could understand. There's probably a lesson in there for all of us: play to your strengths. I wonder how the purists of the time (i.e. those who saw a rigorous analytical solution as the only acceptable method for doing physics) would have felt about Feynman?
@PauloConstantino167
@PauloConstantino167 5 жыл бұрын
@@wongawonga1000 shut up wonga.
@dougr.2398
@dougr.2398 4 жыл бұрын
wongawonga1000 this is at odds with what his wife Gwynneth said about Feynman. She complained that he spent all his time at home calculating integrals. Addendum: I’d say that Feynman knew and used the analytical but « integrated » the geometric and visual with the analytical in new ways
@Xyz-tx6cy
@Xyz-tx6cy 4 жыл бұрын
@@dougr.2398 I guess all could be Feynman or Dyson in their different fields of interest if they are driven passionately in ones works n carelessly in everything else.
@dougr.2398
@dougr.2398 4 жыл бұрын
123 456 interesting supposition.
@bcask61
@bcask61 9 ай бұрын
Its fascinating to listen to these people whose minds work entirely differently than normal people. You can feel the power of their intellect just observing them.
@krissiregar8083
@krissiregar8083 8 ай бұрын
i'm not smart enough to understand particle physics but I could watch this humble man for hoursssssss. amazing humbleness eventhough he was one of the giants
@alekseysoldatenkov5675
@alekseysoldatenkov5675 4 жыл бұрын
It would be an honor to have Feynman to bluntly tell me to exit the room.
@davidfloren5339
@davidfloren5339 3 жыл бұрын
"GET OUT!!!!" ...... (give me 10 minutes and come back then.)
@bcask61
@bcask61 5 жыл бұрын
And to think he wasted his time making vacuum cleaners.
@Cornell851
@Cornell851 5 жыл бұрын
😂😂😂
@sirius3333
@sirius3333 4 жыл бұрын
Hahahaa
@skepticli
@skepticli 4 жыл бұрын
Damn good vacuum cleaners though.
@UsmanKhan-el1kz
@UsmanKhan-el1kz 4 жыл бұрын
more so to make billions
@jjeherrera
@jjeherrera 4 жыл бұрын
Interesting that he compares Feynman with Dirac. Such different personalities, and yet so close in their approaches. Yet there were alsoo differences; for instance, Dirac would lead his line of though believing in the beauty of the equations, while Feynman way of thinking was based on physical intuition.
@lawrencenara4181
@lawrencenara4181 5 жыл бұрын
Just discovered these interviews. Priceless. Timeless.
@donepearce
@donepearce 4 жыл бұрын
Feynman's way was to write down the answer. Genius in a nutshell.
@bassamxp
@bassamxp 4 жыл бұрын
RIP Freeman ♥
@Xyz-tx6cy
@Xyz-tx6cy 4 жыл бұрын
Long live Freeman Dyson. Just love watching his modesty inspire of being one of the best brain in
@sclogse1
@sclogse1 2 жыл бұрын
That last line went off a cliff.
@YanusDV
@YanusDV 2 жыл бұрын
lol @ Feynman driving like a madman with a worried Freeman Dyson in the passenger seat xD
@u.v.s.5583
@u.v.s.5583 5 жыл бұрын
He talks about "Dick" like an accountant would talk about his extremely creative and shady boss. Fun to imagine :-)
@smoothcriminal28
@smoothcriminal28 6 жыл бұрын
I want to invent a time machine exclusively to go back in time and be adopted by Richard Feynman.
@firstal3799
@firstal3799 6 жыл бұрын
Oh dear
@valentin5403
@valentin5403 6 жыл бұрын
He will tell you 'get out' if busy!
@Antoinetheman
@Antoinetheman 4 жыл бұрын
You know, I think Feynman seems like he was a really self absorbed person. Maybe great for science, but I'm not so sure he'd be a great parent.
@trudyandgeorge
@trudyandgeorge Жыл бұрын
He'd have no time for you until his retirement, then he would only have some.
@yuvrajsingh099
@yuvrajsingh099 Жыл бұрын
​@@Antoinetheman Feynman spend a great amount of his time with his family. He loves say Family is important like his father.
@darthglobe4285
@darthglobe4285 6 жыл бұрын
Hey A huge multidimensional thanks to the guy(s) who uploaded these videos..... I love them....... can you do more such interview videos of other physicists ???? it would be applause worthy and a great thing GOOD JOB DONE
@CMCBATCH
@CMCBATCH 4 жыл бұрын
Superb interviews --pity onoy a few thousand see them...worth their weight in gold to students of these subjects all kinds of scientists...
@dougg1075
@dougg1075 4 жыл бұрын
Such a great story teller.
@faithlesshound5621
@faithlesshound5621 4 жыл бұрын
What I like about these comments on the Dyson interview is how they tell us a lot about the individual commentator but very little about Dyson.
@rajeev_kumar
@rajeev_kumar 3 жыл бұрын
Amazing man
@nicholassteel5529
@nicholassteel5529 4 жыл бұрын
Fabulous interview ❤️👍
@shiddy.
@shiddy. 3 жыл бұрын
this one is excellent
@NisseOhlsen
@NisseOhlsen 7 жыл бұрын
Thank you very much for the upload!
@webofstories
@webofstories 7 жыл бұрын
We're delighted that you're enjoying watching these recordings. We're in the process of uploading more Web of Stories videos to KZfaq, so watch this space!
@NisseOhlsen
@NisseOhlsen 7 жыл бұрын
👍
@ChristAliveForevermore
@ChristAliveForevermore 5 жыл бұрын
I get the impression that Dyson is referring to the ever-useful Feynman diagrams for particle physics. I had initially thought that Dyson meant that Feynman thought exclusively in terms of pictures when doing calculations, which would be absolutely incredible if it were the case. I can't even begin to fathom how a person would ever be able to do mathematics without actually doing the mathematics. How would the pictures produce an answer without any previous steps to coax out an answer? Perhaps Feynman's mathematical intuition was so powerful that he really did think in pictures and the Feynman diagrams were just a systemized form of what he did naturally anyways. The man's thought process will forever remain a mystery, I suppose.
@pooman2
@pooman2 Жыл бұрын
I had an ecstatic vision of the zeta function as golden rings once. Thus is my power.
@NuclearCraftMod
@NuclearCraftMod 9 ай бұрын
As far as I can tell, Feynman essentially worked out the QED Feynman rules (i.e. the recipe for working out the diagrams and the mathematical expressions they represent) without formally deriving them from the quantum field theory of QED. I can imagine it must have been pretty amazing at the time that such a shortcut actually worked, since no one really understood its connection to the more "old-school" QFT approach, which involves field operators, commutation relations, and other rather tedious maths. As Dyson describes later on in this interview, he eventually worked out that the connection was actually quite a simple one, and formalised the method by which one could systematically derive the Feynman rules so that you could then correctly draw the diagrams and quickly determine the probability amplitudes. Dyson's approach is now the one taught in pretty much every introductory QFT course.
@rationalsceptic7634
@rationalsceptic7634 4 жыл бұрын
Great Man,RIP
@stephenhicks826
@stephenhicks826 5 жыл бұрын
there is more of this interview somewhere, I'd love to see it.
@allybally0021
@allybally0021 6 жыл бұрын
I love his hoovers.
@mcsuibhne005
@mcsuibhne005 10 ай бұрын
That joke sucks
@soteriology1012
@soteriology1012 4 жыл бұрын
What are the practical implications of this Lamb shift?
@edwardjones2202
@edwardjones2202 6 жыл бұрын
Damn I wish I had the brain to get this stuff...sounds fascinating!
@reecesweet6349
@reecesweet6349 6 жыл бұрын
Edward Jones study study study
@friendlydragon8999
@friendlydragon8999 6 жыл бұрын
Study quantum physics
@edwardjones2202
@edwardjones2202 3 жыл бұрын
@aboctok haha thanks! I study lots of stuff but I think we all have limits and this is mine 😄
@karthikmoyye
@karthikmoyye 2 жыл бұрын
@@edwardjones2202 those who push limits are remembered forever.
@samman350
@samman350 2 жыл бұрын
@@reecesweet6349 There are limits to studying. I thought it would be that way too when I studied physics, but at some point you should respect your own limits, and acknowledge that your mental sanity is more important than theoretical physics. But this is how you learn who you are: you try really hard to be like those you admire, and at some point you will fail to do so. These failures are uniquely yours, and they define you, and you learn your limits, and you learn that you should respect your limits in order to be a happy human being.
@jamestrujillo5195
@jamestrujillo5195 4 жыл бұрын
Sorry for the immaturity but I just had to laugh after he said dick. I'm sorry hahahaha
@jacobvandijk6525
@jacobvandijk6525 3 жыл бұрын
"Feynman & FT?" @ 5:24
@rogeralsop3479
@rogeralsop3479 9 ай бұрын
Richard Feynman!
@thefakenewsnetwork8072
@thefakenewsnetwork8072 2 жыл бұрын
Long live freedom and democratic equality
@drzecelectric4302
@drzecelectric4302 4 жыл бұрын
So he made up rules. So bad ass
@sclogse1
@sclogse1 2 жыл бұрын
You gotta love his vacuums.
@charlesbromberick4247
@charlesbromberick4247 2 жыл бұрын
Dick Feynmann - is that a name or an imperative sentence???
@lorcanoconnor6274
@lorcanoconnor6274 2 жыл бұрын
It's a compliment
@drbonesshow1
@drbonesshow1 Жыл бұрын
Dick's Tricks & Diagrams.
@mayamuadi4700
@mayamuadi4700 2 жыл бұрын
So I came because uramichi oniisan.... 🚶🏻‍♀️
@ekbastu
@ekbastu 5 жыл бұрын
Get out haha
@scottjustscott3730
@scottjustscott3730 3 жыл бұрын
I've always had some difficulty listening to Feynman for more than a minute. He would spew questions and ideas completely unfiltered. Though he was brilliant I would invariably feel like I was listening to a buffoon and a loudmouth and obviously he was neither.
@davidnaugler73
@davidnaugler73 4 жыл бұрын
Freeman Dyson would be more credible had earned a Ph.D. His Dyson Sphere is bad science fiction which he would never advocate if he had learned to defend a thesis. To his discredit he says that no one needs a Ph.D. That is pompous nonsense. He lives in the USA where 2.0% of the population has earned a Ph.D. He is not well educated, pompous and an author of science. Jouralism loves a person who is on the same level as they, pompous, poorly educated and authors of science fiction.
@sailorr4287
@sailorr4287 4 жыл бұрын
He argued relevantly against the system of PhD. See his visit to Fermi, which left four theses in tatters in ten minutes.
@pokeman123451
@pokeman123451 4 жыл бұрын
he didn’t even enjoy the Dyson Sphere idea entirely. he was fascinated by it, and the public blew it up and assigned it to him as one of his “principle works”, regardless of his opinion on the matter
@faithlesshound5621
@faithlesshound5621 4 жыл бұрын
Dyson's reputation rests on his works, starting with papers published in the 1940s by the London Mathematical Society. An early paper got him his Fellowship at Trinity College. But he could have submitted them elsewhere: he was not obliged to get his nihil obstat and imprimatur from his employer.
@edwardjones2202
@edwardjones2202 3 жыл бұрын
Bizarre comment. He can't be learned or incredibly smart if he doesn't have a particular badge?
@robertschlesinger1342
@robertschlesinger1342 Жыл бұрын
Very interesting, informative and worthwhile video.
Freeman Dyson - Linking the ideas of Feynman, Schwinger and Tomanaga (76/157)
6:48
Web of Stories - Life Stories of Remarkable People
Рет қаралды 74 М.
Freeman Dyson - Fermi's rejection of our work (94/157)
6:36
Web of Stories - Life Stories of Remarkable People
Рет қаралды 237 М.
КАРМАНЧИК 2 СЕЗОН 5 СЕРИЯ
27:21
Inter Production
Рет қаралды 584 М.
Why? 😭 #shorts by Leisi Crazy
00:16
Leisi Crazy
Рет қаралды 47 МЛН
когда достали одноклассники!
00:49
БРУНО
Рет қаралды 3,1 МЛН
[Vowel]물고기는 물에서 살아야 해🐟🤣Fish have to live in the water #funny
00:53
Freeman Dyson - Why I don't like the PhD system (95/157)
6:57
Web of Stories - Life Stories of Remarkable People
Рет қаралды 743 М.
Freeman Dyson - Could gravity vary with time? (109/157)
6:10
Web of Stories - Life Stories of Remarkable People
Рет қаралды 95 М.
CNN, Feynman and the Challenger disaster
11:50
vsrr83
Рет қаралды 624 М.
Freeman Dyson - How difficult was it to understand Schwinger? (73/157)
4:56
Web of Stories - Life Stories of Remarkable People
Рет қаралды 125 М.
Richard Feynman. Why.
7:33
firewalker
Рет қаралды 4,4 МЛН
Murray Gell-Mann talks about Richard Feynman
5:31
Muon Ray
Рет қаралды 236 М.
Richard Feynman Electricity
9:35
nebulajr
Рет қаралды 336 М.
Freeman Dyson - Why is the Quantum so Mysterious?
9:59
Closer To Truth
Рет қаралды 57 М.
ПРОБЛЕМА МЕХАНИЧЕСКИХ КЛАВИАТУР!🤬
0:59
Корнеич
Рет қаралды 3,4 МЛН
Which Phone Unlock Code Will You Choose? 🤔️
0:14
Game9bit
Рет қаралды 12 МЛН
iphone fold ? #spongebob #spongebobsquarepants
0:15
Si pamer 😏
Рет қаралды 184 М.
iPhone 12 socket cleaning #fixit
0:30
Tamar DB (mt)
Рет қаралды 3,4 МЛН
Эффект Карбонаро и бумажный телефон
1:01
История одного вокалиста
Рет қаралды 2,6 МЛН