Only after neither could figure out what they're doing or why they were there.

🤣🤣 how these people get paid for what they “don’t do” - she sounds like she had a bit too much of something

I fell asleep watching her in this video.

What was your toughest interviewer you’ve had in recent years. Well 1996 was tough but I don’t remember their names

😂😂😂

No disrespect…. Is she high?!

@@kimbarrystudio7760 No, that is her natural state.

@@user-he8su9oq8l fucking HELL 😂😂

Very firm

Well said.

Great idea!

Nailed it!

WOW BRILLIANT IDEA

IF ONLY MAN!

Joe Rogan

It’s almost like she lost for a reason.

She sounds like a clown

Hopefully the last time

There's nothing she's willing to say.

Lol. I'm un-shockingly underwhelmed

She looked incompetent here.

She was put on the ballot to dilute the vote

@@JonnyBeoulve She looked/sounded drunk or high on something

She should be scrutinised to the highest degree. Going easy on these clowns is not the answer.

you felt sorry for a traitor..

Dave smith for president micheal malice for press sec.

Ron Paul is the godfather. The recent candidates are wack.

@@WebSurfingIsMyPastime well the 3 that got elected in New Hampshire seem to be holding the line.... 2 more seats and libertarians are the majority in NH

@@WarmodeEngaged Dave Smith is just as qualified to be president as any of the Libertarian presidential nominees of recent memory. That being said, he's not qualified to be president. I'm a libertarian. We need a strong leader who can advocate the liberty we want to see, BUT ALSO we need a strong leader who can win over the partisans. We need a contender, not a weenie. Jo Jorgensen and Gary Johnson are weenies and they embody weak candidacy.

The problem is people who actually practice libertarianism and really understand it generally don't become politicians.

Hardly anyone pushes back on these people. If they do, they don’t get anymore interviews.

@@ironsideeve2955 that's how it has to be for them. Most are just softballed questions s all evening, many already knowing what those questions are before they're asked.

Thank you for endorsing trump

@@craigo6808 He had his chance and did a horrible job.

@@american_cosmic how do you figure? After Reagan he is the best president we’ve had. Need proof? Economy, wages, inflation etc.

@@american_cosmic oh really is that right Ben? Let me guess Biden is doing a great job?

Someone Like a businessman who made himself a success? Someone who understands the economy? Someone who speaks his mind and says exactly what he thinks, even if it's not politically correct? Someone who isn't part of the political establishment? An outsider? Huh... We should find someone like that..

She is the reason I didn't vote libertarian this past election.

She's like adam.

not true his first question was when was the last time you had a tough debate then he changed the question 3 times and the 3rd question was when have you debated a democrat or republican at 2:02 she answered that question immediately

keep it ideological because the Libertarian party is full of SJW leftists even though there is a wave economically literate "Mises Caucus" leaders taking over the party.

I always suggest to take a look at the Mises Caucus, and support it if you find common ground. Michael Heise is doing God's work to bring the Liberty Movement back into the Libertarian Party.

yeah she can't debate

Two words - controlled opposition. A competent third party would crush our pseudo two party system which is actually two sides of the same coin . At some point we have to restore our government back to of the people by the people instead of the corporate cabal .

@@jamesolivito4374 a third party would not be able to elect a president or many congressmen because most people are not going to leave the republican or democratic party the people control the government right now but they won't apply the pressure on leaders that is needed to get them to comply with the demands of the voters

💯💯💯💯💯

watching her respond is like watching a deadly avoidable car crash in slow motion while she's oblivious.

Valuetainment need to pin this comment.

it did have that vibe

how the heck do you see that her pupils are dilated?

@@nonamenamenamenone He can’t. he’s making shit up. BZDs don’t really dry your mucous membranes out, as they aren’t anticholinergic, for one

Definitely I was about to comment shes on Xanax

So do most people.

you know it's bad when...

Your compare like a fool. Doubt you know Harris and who she is, was.

That part got me lol

And it was such an easy question.

Yeah, I was like no, in the future.

Right? I literally said out loud, "No, in the future." WTF??

@@silvermediastudio ...she sounded pharma drugged. There's a characteristic slur and spaced out ness on those things🥴

How is it her fault that no Democrats or Republicans will let third parties on the debate stage because they know they will look like fools debating anyone that is not an establishment puppet like they all are?

Wait, are you serious? This line of questioning is asinine, juvenile and irrelevant: who cares about Jo's hardest debate, what are her policies? That's what matters in politics

She's so weak. She would have had a hard time leading the country during the boomer years let alone now.

@@cameronmachado1774 Gotta be able to defend yourself to get your policies in

@@cameronmachado1774 it's called introducing a tough topic, in the friendliest way possible.

snorefest2024

I’d turn on that video nightly to fall asleep.

Big big money

classy lol

@@dleoner1 i was thinking the same 😂

Dementia, perhaps.

@SOUL SEEKER what has she been doing all these years lol

Hammered

Pills 💊

She’s on Xanax clearly

Depending on where on the Libertarian spectrum they are, there are just HUGE holes in their platform. The biggest for me is the no border, no market regulation, no pollution laws when we currently already have a VERY slanted playing field caused by the mass concentration of wealth enabled by imaginary money...rule by fiat has 2 meanings!

@@fazole The abolition of the Fed and the return to at least a bi-metal commodity backed monetary system would slowly solve a great deal of our issues.

@@fazole all of that exists because of the state

libertarians don't support a no borders policy they support a open borders policy wee would defend our country from hostile invasion only i have seen no evidence that that they are against all regulations i believe they are against unnecessary regulation i have seen no evidence that they are against all pollution laws many want to abolish the EPA what's imaginary about our money? it's very much real ruling by fiat is called democracy

@@fazole If you're for market regulation, you're *not* Libertarian.

cuz they sit on fences

We/they hate joining groups. "Herding cats" is to put it mildly.

I know right! The current administration is soooo much better. Joe Biden is the epitome of competency and articulation. No one comes remotely close to him...🙄

kinda hard to build a coalition of commies, stoners, racists, and classic liberals.

@@eajinabi I mean, who doesn't love an old pedo who can't remember he's actually the president?!

I agree and if you keep on saying "Back in 1996..." over and over and over again, something is not right. It's 2022 babe.

Toughest interview was Washington Post! don't make me laugh lol. Seemed like this was the toughest, and he was on your side. love the line from PBD "Thats like saying you want to be a heavyweight, but the last time you fought a heavyweight was 26 years ago, thats a LONG time ago"

She’s on Xanax is why it’s obvious

She was.

That's because libertarianism is virtually antithetical to politics...Certainly to something collective like a party

I suspect this is the case because of the inherent paradox of someone who wants to use political power to rid the system of political power. I think governments are, in a sense, an organism. Organisms seek to grow, propagate, adapt, mutate perhaps, and so on. This is true of biological organisms but also of corporations, social clubs, religions, and political entities. Anything perceived as being harmful to the growth of an organism is, in one way or another, expelled or at least constrained. Thomas Jefferson said that it was the natural tendency for government to grow and liberty to yield, I think this is the reason why. I believe this creates a few problems for libertarians: 1. Because few non-libertarians take libertarianism seriously, libertarianism tends to attract a lot of non-serious people (Vermin Supreme for example), which only serves to reinforce the skepticism of others about the party and platform. 2. Political outsiders can take extreme positions to win favor with their base, but such ideas are not practical for most other voters. For example: I don't like taxes, I don't know anyone who does. But not liking taxes is not the same as thinking ALL taxes can be abolished immediately, everywhere, forever. 3. Because of 1., there tends to be a lack of charisma among candidates. Gary Johnson had some good ideas, seemed like a decent enough guy, and had a fair track record as Governor. But they guy had the charm of a sleepy librarian. And yet he seemed like Cary Grant compared to Jo Jorgensen. I don't know what the answer is (I don't think anyone does, since libertarian parties everywhere are so dysfunctional) but I think candidates and would-be bureaucrats need to infiltrate the ranks of conventional political parties and government agencies and dismantle the apparatus from within. Like cancer.

Mises caucus

She did. It sounded horrible. But I agree. Ha! A debate should be based on values you have in common. The great Reset, for example, is not debatable for a party that believes in capitalism. That's obviously an opinion; obviously two people can get on stage and throw ideas at each other, and sometimes the commonality comes up. But most debates are short formats for answers where all you are waiting for is a zinger. Or perhaps a Rick Perry moment. Put the issues on a webpage.

It sounded good in her head

Factoids

A NEVER was

Lol, well said

Perfect answer you rock...that was painful, but I love Patrick Bet David

I mean, he DID say that "it's all about grilling the other person". Debates these days are pointless anyway.

Maybe, but he was an embarrassment too during his 2016 run.

Aleppo?

Agreed

Disagree because both Ron Paul and Rand Paul have been in major debates. It is not the American publics job to give debates. It the job of the debator to get debates.

@@da-cd3hh neither of them debated her? If your point is that Ron/Rand have debated other politicians, yes, yes they have, but They are assigned to the Republican Party( even though they have libertarian values, Ron more than rand)which has given them platform to debate on stage. As it stands both parties have made rules that hinder the abilities for other parties to get on stage during primaries/generals and debate

It's her responsibility to cut her teeth and keep her philosophy sharp. She strikes me as the biggest fish in the smallest pond.

@@fioree2532 So just to be clear (and this did come up with Harry Browne), the Debate commission is a 100% private *bi-partisan* commission. Why should they debate a Libertarian. Especially if the Libertarian gets 2% of a vote that might mean something.They debate each other because they are trying to sway the field. They don't do debates even with each other If they have something to lose.

I lose brain cells every time I read I try to read someone using emotes to express what they're trying to say

That is very unfortunate. Not surprising though. I think for those really looking there only is one political party. Sure there are many ideologies and groups or "movements" with many overlays.

Being Libertarians, possibly they weren't returning your phone calls because they don't like people intruding in their lives :)

@@johnbrown7911 I would be inclined to support any party that pushes for term limits and a shutdown of congressional stock trading. My spidey sense tells me no party would be an advocate for those. I know some individuals in state legislatures are calling for a Convention of States to address term limits but it is slow going.....

@@janridingfast1448 absolutely. I'd add upper age limits to that as well. No more dinosaurs, 65 is the max

Contesting the presidential election is the thing you do at the end. Build up locally, then regionally.

Good try. You got Jotato instead.

I’m an anarcho capitalist and I would’ve voted for Trump over her that’s how bad she is. We have the greatest, most brilliant philosophy and values in the world and she makes watching paint dry more exciting than anything she has to say. It’s infuriating, but 2024 a change is coming be ready

@@libertyliam 😂 bruh trump is a thousand times worse. I would never vote for trump or Biden, I did vote for Jo Jorgensen though and I do not regret it.

@@Kahoobb what I mean is he actually brings excitement to people where jo just talks like she doesn’t want to be there

......At an earlier age Conor Roy was interested in politics

It is a work in progress. We (Mises) have to throw out from the state parties all the Establishment and Lunatics first.

Amen.....

Yes!!!! She was and is a garbage candidate. Dave Smith 2024!!! Michael Malice for press secretary!

Yeah Dave Smith really needs to get on this podcast. I agree with you. I don't agree with him on everything. But most of it. I think the larger population of the United States whether they want to admit it or not. Because everybody will claim Conservative Republican or left democrat. However I would say the bigger percentage would be center right center left but you could really say libertarian left or right. Because most of us we just want less government less taxes. Less b*******. Let people do what they want to do. Get rid of these absurd walls that send people to jail for 4 years for possession. and if they have a felony when they get out felonies off their record because let them vote again they've already done their punishment simple things that we all would agree on. It's just that the government especially in the last decade love to segregate us. They couldn't do it by race so they're going to do it by political affiliation and religion a little bit and now they're doing what they can to go back to the race thing and segregate. But what's absurd is especially the Democratic party. And the left we need you. They cater to the extreme left. That we all know they're out of their minds they're just absurd and it's a very small percentage of citizens in the united states. However the media attention they get magnifies them makes them appear bigger. Even to themselves. This government it's changing the way the United States operates and restricts the freedoms of the citizens. The majority of citizens for the privileges given to the extreme left you wouldn't see a big corporation or a company have 100 employees. 95 of those employees are pretty much the same they're on the same page same book. But because of five employees that CEO of the company is going to change all standard operating procedures and whatnot to benefit and cater to that five people. Changing the whole company. Your employees to conform to that five. You don't see it why it doesn't make sense. Plus these people demanding equality and they just want to be true like everybody else freedom of speech blah blah blah. They have it BLM trans community they have it we don't care what you do. As long as it doesn't interfere with our rights. So you have equality and it's not even that they want equality they want privilege. Especially the feminist movement feminism rather. They're equal 70% of the colleges are women or in each college 70% of the students are females. And they choose the HR the clerical the office type or corporate type work. And also the medical field. Nurses nurses assistance physical therapist phlebotomist things like this. And the feminism argument is the wage Gap and whatnot. then they only have themselves to blame because they're the predominant ones in this field now. So they make the most money in this field. And if you want to get technical more females are going to college. So the percentage ratio is off 30% are men so it should be 50/50 right. And then you have divorce and if you have kids the custody. where's the equality there because more often than not marital assets are split even if she never worked she gets half your stuff more than half actually she gets to keep the living accommodations the house the apartment whatever. The kids primarily go to the woman 95% of the time. And how many times have you seen fathers I know personally I'm like this I have my kids how it's laid out 4 weeks in a month three days four days three days four days. It comes out to like 15 days a month so half the time and I still have to pay $2,500 a month child support. So if it was actually fair. then it would be okay sure split Mary will assets but be fair about that. If the father has the kids half the time. Then they have to agree civily where the courts will make it happen that the mother will pay for school clothes and supplies the father will pay for insurance medical sports things like this and then when each parent has the children then they pay for the food and whatnot. And then there's no more child support exchange. So feminism especially they get privilege. so all these left work stream left groups like as I mentioned they don't want equality because they already have it. They want special treatment they want privilege. Privilege of what basically to live off the government's dime and not really do anything. and then like this newer generation they're all yelling $15 an hour but if anybody ever watch the Tucker Carlson interview like for weeks ago. There was ainterview. And the main person the spokesperson or whatever for this group I forget what it was but they were talking about when they get living wages. Then they'll go back to work but then Tucker disputed it kind of and okay sure give you living wages then it turned into something else but they slipped up and got mad they essentially basically admitted that they think they deserve to get paid and do nothing. They're just lazy that's all it is.it's awful what society is turned into but you can just blame us parents really as older people because for whatever reason nowadays parents want to be their kid's friends. And then come puberty time when it starts getting hectic parents can't put their foot down it's too late. and even then they're still wanted to be their best friends. Instead of disciplining your kids or my kids obese in this whole obesity thing. You as a parent restrict their food. And it's not just something that happens you know sure maybe a very small percentage of a thyroid problem but the rest of them do it from eating. And diabetes because all this body shaming b******* that's what it is because like they are fat they are obese. To promote that and pretend that you're happy and everybody else is wrong. That camera goes off they're crying. Plus if everything's so great one of their lead spokespersons just from last couple years 35 years old I think 40 years old she just died last week and they said unknown causes and she died in her sleep. I have an idea what it was. but if everything was fine with these obese people and it's just their body be comfortable in it. Let's see your blood test let's see your LDL let's see your cholesterol but see the plaque score of your arteries I see your blood pressure I used to be fat. I know they're not happy when I was a teenager I had to make it up with humor

Definitely went overboard on that response LOL once I started hitting other subjects I just went on a roll. I'm driving so that's explaining the grammatical errors. But you'll get the gist of it. Sorry about the excessive length of it. I'm doing speech to text as I said and I'm driving home from work. Early night or early day. Getting I got off at 7:00. went in at 5:00 this morning. So early day normally I would work until about 9:00. Got to pay for that life you know normal life bills taxes $2,500 a month child support LOL alimony. Good thing she cheated on me lol after 7 1/2 years of not working at least I got a pair of shorts they let me keep a pair of shorts so that was a plus she got the house the cars and everything else

Bahaha. So true

That’s exactly what I was thinking too 😂 had her on the ropes

When you answer a question with a question- you are buying time- often to formulate a lie.

I was thinking it could be in the very present at the time she said it. Meaning she was having a tough time answering PBD.

Same

The rich see an economic crisis as a garage sale and also the rich stay rich by investing and diversifying their portfolio with stock, crypto currency investment which is the wisest thing every individual need to do and it is really profitable.

You are right about that do you mind sharing with me how to get intouch with Mrs Amy Robinette. I have little to no knowledge about crypto currencies and I have seen the rise from 100 USD to over 50k USD in the last few years.

Thank you so much I will definitely reach out.

Wow, Is amazing to see people who have also invested with Amy Robinette. I thought am the only one she helped through this rough market.

Yes of course, my trader Mrs Amy Robinette she very experiences in the market i meet her at los Angeles's, her success story are everywhere

Actually I sortof identify with many libertarian talking points. I think most of Americans would. Shallow, intellectually thin people like her are the only reason you dismiss libertarian as “marginal.”

Please! Then DeSantis 2028!

@@SN00PICUS yes.. I've been watching him for a while now . He'll definitely get my votes!

No one simps harder for Trump than trolls on sock accounts.

@@sly_tendencies87 aka Man or Bitch!

The majority of libertarians would agree with you. She won the nomination because hornberger was going pretty hard after Amash, and then Amash dropped out leaving him pretty high and dry. Jorgensen really wasn't the best choice, honestly I've never met anyone who LOVES her after 5 years of being very involved in liberty politics.